POL The Powers-That-Be Are Making Their Move to Drop Biden and Insert [Big Mike] Obama

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns
Whelp, time will tell.


@TheReal40_Head

A MUST READ: There's a lot of talk about the Democrats bringing in a last minute replacement candidate to run in 2024 for Joe Biden since it's been publicly proven that he is unfit for office, much less able to run again for another 4 years. There's a problem though that people aren't thinking about.

Every single state has their own election laws that REQUIRE a candidate to have filed, paid the fees, and aquired the necessary signatures (sometimes as many as several thousand from EVERY voting district in that state) before they can run as a presidential candidate in that state.

There's only 11 states and DC left whose filing dates haven't already passed. Half of those remaining 11 state's final filing dates are today, February 9th, 2024. -Alaska -Connecticut -Idaho -Indiana -Maryland -Nebraska -New Jersey -New Mexico -Oregon -South Dakota -Wyoming - District of Columbia

People say "oh they'll just change the laws in the 39 states whose final filing dates have already passed". Well, there are laws preventing that as well. Most states say any changes made to the election laws must be completed before the state begins accepting applications from potential candidates. In fact, many states say new election laws passed will not take effect until the following election cycle. So, change them in 2024, they won't take effect until 2028.

There's protection here provided to someone in Trump's position. If a state tries to alter it's election laws to allow a last minute registration or a last minute change to their laws, Trump can use the state's own statutes against them and sue to stop them with a court injunction. State election laws are pretty well set in stone if not changed on time. Unless those "replacement candidates" filed discretely long ago, the deadline to file has already passed in 39 states.
@kevincorke

@KanekoaTheGreat

@AwakenedOutlaw

@IQUQWEQ

@Americanlll

@drawandstrike

@deluxe_pepe

@RealJamesWoods

@TheParasiteGuy

@TPV_John

@BrainStorm_Joe

@austerrewyatt1

@elonmusk


View: https://twitter.com/TheReal40_Head/status/1756015832294195279
 

von Koehler

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Perhaps I am wrong, but are not delegates bound to their pledged candidate only for the first round of balloting?

After that they can change their vote?

A lot of fine details are going to be read though this Democrat convention.
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
Whelp, time will tell.


@TheReal40_Head

A MUST READ: There's a lot of talk about the Democrats bringing in a last minute replacement candidate to run in 2024 for Joe Biden since it's been publicly proven that he is unfit for office, much less able to run again for another 4 years. There's a problem though that people aren't thinking about.

Every single state has their own election laws that REQUIRE a candidate to have filed, paid the fees, and aquired the necessary signatures (sometimes as many as several thousand from EVERY voting district in that state) before they can run as a presidential candidate in that state.

There's only 11 states and DC left whose filing dates haven't already passed. Half of those remaining 11 state's final filing dates are today, February 9th, 2024. -Alaska -Connecticut -Idaho -Indiana -Maryland -Nebraska -New Jersey -New Mexico -Oregon -South Dakota -Wyoming - District of Columbia

People say "oh they'll just change the laws in the 39 states whose final filing dates have already passed". Well, there are laws preventing that as well. Most states say any changes made to the election laws must be completed before the state begins accepting applications from potential candidates. In fact, many states say new election laws passed will not take effect until the following election cycle. So, change them in 2024, they won't take effect until 2028.

There's protection here provided to someone in Trump's position. If a state tries to alter it's election laws to allow a last minute registration or a last minute change to their laws, Trump can use the state's own statutes against them and sue to stop them with a court injunction. State election laws are pretty well set in stone if not changed on time. Unless those "replacement candidates" filed discretely long ago, the deadline to file has already passed in 39 states.
@kevincorke

@KanekoaTheGreat

@AwakenedOutlaw

@IQUQWEQ

@Americanlll

@drawandstrike

@deluxe_pepe

@RealJamesWoods

@TheParasiteGuy

@TPV_John

@BrainStorm_Joe

@austerrewyatt1

@elonmusk


View: https://twitter.com/TheReal40_Head/status/1756015832294195279
How many states has Kennedy filed in?

Could he switch back to being a Democrat?

And, would the party want him back, in an emergency of Biden backing out, and Kennedy polling as the best candidate to win?

My take on the Dems is that, love or hate their candidate, they WILL rally around that person, because their party winning is the ONLY thing that matters to them.
 

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
Whelp, time will tell.


@TheReal40_Head

A MUST READ: There's a lot of talk about the Democrats bringing in a last minute replacement candidate to run in 2024 for Joe Biden since it's been publicly proven that he is unfit for office, much less able to run again for another 4 years. There's a problem though that people aren't thinking about.

Every single state has their own election laws that REQUIRE a candidate to have filed, paid the fees, and aquired the necessary signatures (sometimes as many as several thousand from EVERY voting district in that state) before they can run as a presidential candidate in that state.

There's only 11 states and DC left whose filing dates haven't already passed. Half of those remaining 11 state's final filing dates are today, February 9th, 2024. -Alaska -Connecticut -Idaho -Indiana -Maryland -Nebraska -New Jersey -New Mexico -Oregon -South Dakota -Wyoming - District of Columbia

People say "oh they'll just change the laws in the 39 states whose final filing dates have already passed". Well, there are laws preventing that as well. Most states say any changes made to the election laws must be completed before the state begins accepting applications from potential candidates. In fact, many states say new election laws passed will not take effect until the following election cycle. So, change them in 2024, they won't take effect until 2028.

There's protection here provided to someone in Trump's position. If a state tries to alter it's election laws to allow a last minute registration or a last minute change to their laws, Trump can use the state's own statutes against them and sue to stop them with a court injunction. State election laws are pretty well set in stone if not changed on time. Unless those "replacement candidates" filed discretely long ago, the deadline to file has already passed in 39 states.
@kevincorke

@KanekoaTheGreat

@AwakenedOutlaw

@IQUQWEQ

@Americanlll

@drawandstrike

@deluxe_pepe

@RealJamesWoods

@TheParasiteGuy

@TPV_John

@BrainStorm_Joe

@austerrewyatt1

@elonmusk


View: https://twitter.com/TheReal40_Head/status/1756015832294195279
Most states have ways to handle replacing candidates on the ballot.

Here is a small section of Missouri state law that deals with this issue:

115.383. Name changes on ballot, how made. — Any election authority duly notified that a name is to be removed from the ballot or that a new candidate has been selected shall have the proper corrections made on the ballot before the ballot is delivered to or while it is in the hands of the printer.
 

WildDaisy

God has a plan, Trust it!
Perhaps I am wrong, but are not delegates bound to their pledged candidate only for the first round of balloting?

After that they can change their vote?

A lot of fine details are going to be read though this Democrat convention.
Yes and no. It depends on the state. Some are required by their congress to vote for the nominee. Some are not bound to do so, but usually do. Some are only bound on the first vote, if there is no determination on the first vote, they are then free to cast their vote as they wish.
 

BH

. . . .
Washington has proved the Constitution and Federal laws no longer matter and can be ignored

2020 proved that State Voting laws also no longer matter and can be ignored

These people will do as they wish, laws be damned

Not only did they just make FJB incompetent to stand trial, he also can no longer be a competent witness for anything

There no longer can be any blowback from Dear Ole Joe
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
my bet is Whitmer, the Michigan bitch
Whitmer IS a favored daughter of the Deep State. Her connection/protection/prosecution of plot is proof that the Deep State will go to bat for her in a moment's notice.

And given her "gaffes" along the way through that whole plot episode, she's pretty well "owned" now.

Ownership is a BIG part of the Deep State Presidency.

Don't leave Democracy without it.

1634256380418


Dobbin
 

TFergeson

Non Solum Simul Stare
Not a chance. White man for boss, black woman in subordinate role?
Indeed. I would expect the opposite, Big Mike as President and Newsome as VP, especially considering the rumors that he is being groomed for a presidential run in 2028
 

Blue 5

Veteran Member
If I may...

Someone on Twitter put out the idea of Newsome and our pedo-faced fascist "governor" Beshear as a potential replacement ticket. Both appear to be popular with half-wits and mask wearers. And given that Beshear is almost completely stymied by the state legislature - which has veto-proof republican majorities - he'd probably welcome the opportunity to get back to destroying the country.
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
The "open-minded, tolerant" Left is not going to tolerate putting Michelle as VP to a white man. I have thought for a good while that Michelle will be installed as "first black woman president".
The "open-minded, tolerant" Left was fine with Biden over Harris. What makes a white man over Michelle any different?

The Left has a herd mentality that doesn't think for itself, individually. So, whatever is thrown out there, they will vote for.
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
If I may...

Someone on Twitter put out the idea of Newsome and our pedo-faced fascist "governor" Beshear as a potential replacement ticket. Both appear to be popular with half-wits and mask wearers. And given that Beshear is almost completely stymied by the state legislature - which has veto-proof republican majorities - he'd probably welcome the opportunity to get back to destroying the country.
Nationwide, Beshear has about 0% name recognition. My opinion is that he hasn't enough time to get the needed recognition.
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
I still suggest a couple moderates will be coronated.

The world controllers need a few more years to completely mine away personal freedom and minimize resistance.

That can be done at half the current speed and still be achieved.

Controllable lukewarm candidates are to be reviled worse than zealots from either side. Jmo.

Ftr, middle-of-the-road would be acceptable and desirable with a solid Constitutional Supreme Court. Not sure we can count on that at this juncture.
 

Nancy in OK

Senior Member
I read an article that said Mooch/Gavin will be the ticket. They also said Dr. Jill believes she is more qualified over Mooch or Kamala. They also said she is the one who said no before about Joe not running. She likes the benefits of being in the House and all of the vacations. The article said she would fight to remain. We will see pretty soon I would think.
 

Nich1

Veteran Member
The "open-minded, tolerant" Left was fine with Biden over Harris. What makes a white man over Michelle any different?

The Left has a herd mentality that doesn't think for itself, individually. So, whatever is thrown out there, they will vote for.
Because Harris is not MO!
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
Surely the Democrats must have someone better lined up to replace Biden, they've had enough time to nurture a candidate and they've known about his age and incapacity for years. They should have several suitable contenders say in their 40s or 50s. MO could not possibly be POTUS and neither can Kamala.

Just seen someone has already made a similar point. I posted without reading the thread.
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
they've had enough time to nurture a candidate and they've known about his age and incapacity for years.
EXACTLY why he is there in the first place.

I think the Marxists had expected that by now "elections"/"democracy"/revolution would already have occurred, thus paving their way for the "social state."

And, in large part it has - except for that "compulsion" part.

What they are seeing with the collapse of the economy is the "John Galt" effect. This horse mentioned this during the Obama Administration (gosh I have been here that long?)

During the Obama Admin, "profit" became a "dirty word." Anyone who found they could make money easily during this time found that suddenly the Federal "whatever" would be weaponized against them. Car-Makers, Utilities, Guitar makers, shoemakers, candlestick makers all found MANY varieties of Federal Agency against them. It became more and more difficult to make a profit - so many didn't bother anymore. They all went "Galt."

Those who did succeed were largely "high tech", new, and "unique." Think Twitter, Google, Silicon Valley. The government was not nearly so adept at "regulating" these entities. And it didn't take the tech entrepreneurs long to "buy" their way into Congress. Or fund election collusion.

Thus the rise of the Socialist/Fascist state - a collusion of entities, both government and private - who could "call the tune."

And, mostly they did. The installation of Obama was likely done through election fraud, which was reinforced during his second term. Trump's win in 2016 was a "loose end" that the DNC was not prepared for. But since then its been repeated MAGA losses as Ronna and the RINO have done what they could to stem the tide.

These "movers and shakers" are those that Molly Ball wrote about in her "2020 Election" thesis for Time Magazine. The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

Meanwhile, the economy recovered for a bit under the Trump "semi-management" - until the created Covid-19 scare.

Right now under the Biden Regime, the economy is completing its "winding down" similar to the Obama Years. But its not happening near as fast as the Marxists expected it would. In large part because of the rise of the Internet and "Off Major Media News Sources."

Which was NEVER predicted in 2020. Too many know EXACTLY what is happening now - and they're not buying it.

Were it not for the Internet, you would all be wearing masks, working from home on your computers, ordering what you need to live from online sources, living in your basement, and cashing your EBT checks or the next round of government Covid Stimulus checks.

Dobbin
 
Last edited:

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What??
Nobody loved Michelle Obama, while Obama was President, what makes them think she can win the Presidency? Everyone KNOWS she is a sock puppet
For another presidential term for BARAK OBAMA!
What kind of end run around the law, does Barak
think he's gonna make?

Easy … Dominion
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
welp I'm thinking if y'all really want to know what the dems are thinking, then mozy on over to the democratic underground and see what they are thinking. Make sure to wear a poncho and mud boots when you go over there.
 
Last edited:
Top