OP-ED The one thing you must have in your bug-out bag

hypoluxo

Veteran Lurker
Another humorous gem from the Woodpile report...

http://www.woodpilereport.com/html/index-245.htm



The one thing you must have in your bug-out bag

A bug-out bag is a grab-and-go bag should a disaster force your immediate relocation. Typically they include first aid suitable for bug bites and minor boo boos, a flashlight and a radio with spare batteries, a colorful whistle, sensible food, scrips and copies of essential documents, puzzles for the kids and so forth. 'Disaster Preparedness Hints' suggest you buckle up, and oh yes, check your windshield wiper blades for nicks that could degrade your Bug-Out Experience. The idea is to be self-sufficient until help arrives or until you reach a comfy place simply by driving there.

Notice the underlying assumptions. The evacuation will be hurried but orderly. You'll get out of Dodge at the posted speed limit. Help will arrive with latti scremati and twelve-grain donuts in hand, everything will be sorted out while-u-wait by well-mannered and caring DHS subcontractors acting wholly in your interest. You and your rescuers will bond in adversity, maybe you'll have a reunion later to 'remember when'. Your descendents will tell stories of how you survived on kippers and marmalade at some downscale rest stop where you even had to share a bathroom with imperfect strangers.

That's the notion behind the official Homeland Security bug-out, oops, evacuation. DC envisions smartly uniformed Fellow Americans in day-glo vests handing out pamphlets and wet-wipes to grateful, minimally inconvenienced, fully self-supporting, polite and attentive refugees. Disasters are something to be managed by them you see, all as neat and orderly as their flow-charts, thanks to your cheerful compliance. Then it's back to hearth and home with you, please forgive the inconvenience and don't forget to rate our service.

Not bloody likely, unless the disaster is a burst water main in the Hamptons.

At the other end there are bug-out bags designed for the Burt Gummers among us, the ones with an all-wheel-drive armored motor home with a humvee in tow. The equipment list goes heavy on tricked-out carbines and GU Gel-packs and bench-made bespoke knives. Their scenario involves shootouts with menacing but hapless hostiles at every other intersection, then, while living like Fort Lauderdale retirees mind you, engaging witless bad guys in the high country followed by after-action reports, a well-deserved brandy and pithy quotes for their memoirs. All in all, unassailable proof everyone's the hero of their own life story, Obama staffers excepted.

The underlying assumption is a comfortable but action-packed mini-drama where fortune smiles on the bold, namely and to wit: themselves. The narrative is one of encapsulating their normal life, dropping it into Ansel Adams country and doing a credible George Hayduke during the commercial breaks. Their anticipated survival experience is equivalent to, perhaps, a five-mile walk on the Appalachian Trail, in good weather with catering as is unavoidable. Which would be often. After a time the unpleasantness would abate and they'd motor home through the smoldering desolation and personally only need turn the utilities back on and point up the brickwork.

Reality varies notably from these imaginings. Tornadoes and earthquakes differ from national catastrophes, which in turn differ from extinction-level events. Yes, you should have a bug-out bag. Yes you should have a plan and a secure retreat. But no, you can't have any actionable idea of what will really happen much in advance of it happening. As combat veterans understand, "no battle plan survives first contact with the enemy." The only plan you can have is to be prepared, flexible and realistic.

Don't expect anything of value to you from authorities and don't expect timely information of value to you from the media. Expect government to oppose your escape with threats or force, after all, you're a paying customer attempting to leave the mall. Others may follow. Their interest is in maintaining order, their order, not in passing out valuable resources for free. You'll recall "maintaining order" meant instructing people in the twin towers to stay put and await a professionally supervised evacuation. We know this from people who acted on their own judgment and fled.

Also recall during Katrina how police, those who hadn't joined the looters or decamped to more pleasant venues, forcibly disarmed honest citizens in their own homes with assistance from the National Guard, then cherry-picked the loot for themselves. Assume at the outset your local statists will use a disaster to betray their oath and you.

The federal government hasn't distinguished themselves in recent years either. For example, Steve Kroft of CBS News says,

It's been three years since the financial crisis crippled the American economy. Yet there has not been a single prosecution of a high ranking Wall Street executive or major financial firm.

Karl Denninger at Market Tickerhas been calling for prosecutions for over four years. As he wrote on Monday,

In a CBS 60 Minutes segment: Borgers tells Kroft that the FCIC found evidence of trillions of dollars of fraud and gross negligence, and that in the area of mortgage fraud, he found crimes committed by "mortgage originators, underwriters, banks ... across the board." Yet still, no prosecutions, so far.

That's the bottom line. So tell me, do you still believe that the government is not intentionally involved in covering this up and keeping the people who should be in prison from facing the music for their crimes?

As to Mr. Denninger's question, "do you still believe that the government is not intentionally involved in covering this up?", well of course they are, duh. They're the same people. We would ask where CBS News and the rest of the press has been all these years, that is, we would if we didn't already know. They're also "intentionally involved." Government and news media work from the same memos because they're in the same business, which is to keep the facts from the populace. It's only when the pile becomes a menace to navigation that news outfits like 60 Minutes jump in front of the parade, often while arranging a major distraction with their DC colleagues to evade such unpleasant duties. A war crisis, say.

We've come to rely on the media to misrepresent facts they don't merely withhold. Surely you've noticed crime stories suppress full and reliable descriptions when their favored felons are the miscreants of record. It would be comforting to think the press won't cover up decisive, actionable facts during a major calamity as well, but the truth lies elsewhere. You can expect the mainstream press to lie early and often in such a case. Big news media is pretty much a holding pen for the irretrievably unprincipled, journalists being the deployable euphemism, some even "award-winning". Say the word ethics to a "journalist" and they'll assume it's the name of someone's yacht, someone they'd really like to know.

Perilous events are Darwinian by nature. Hindsight suggests the casualties often selected themselves, perfect knowledge would probably prove it. The survivors informed themselves of what was actually happening, then extrapolated what may happen, then refined it to what was likely to happen. Survival begins and ends with applied good judgment. Think back in your own life to those little things you did or didn't do, those seemingly trivial stitches in time that kept you from a bad end. It wasn't all luck or happenstance. Now that the storm is upon us, now that ever-larger catastrophes are entraining and we're being pelted with debris, a bug-out bag is evidence of good judgement in itself. Good judgement well applied is the one indispensible survival tool and likely the oldest. Be sure to take yours with you.
 

Guns-N-Moses

Senior Member
Perhaps it's just me, but other than the obvious statements about the government, this article made very little sense.

I realize much of it was supposed to be satire, but I found it very hard to read.

I am still trying to figure out what the author's point was, it almost seemed like some portions of the article were missing.

And BTW, what is the "one thing you must have in your bug-out bag"?

Unless I missed it, I don't believe it was mentioned.
 
Perhaps it's just me, but other than the obvious statements about the government, this article made very little sense.

I realize much of it was supposed to be satire, but I found it very hard to read.

I am still trying to figure out what the author's point was, it almost seemed like some portions of the article were missing.

And BTW, what is the "one thing you must have in your bug-out bag"?

Unless I missed it, I don't believe it was mentioned.

I think it was "trust no one"? I missed it too....
 

nharrold

Deceased
Perhaps it's just me, but other than the obvious statements about the government, this article made very little sense.

I realize much of it was supposed to be satire, but I found it very hard to read.

I am still trying to figure out what the author's point was, it almost seemed like some portions of the article were missing.

And BTW, what is the "one thing you must have in your bug-out bag"?

Unless I missed it, I don't believe it was mentioned.

Here it is, the last sentence: "Good judgement well applied is the one indispensible survival tool and likely the oldest."
 

changed

Preferred pronouns: dude/bro
I skimmed the article and never did figure out what the thing for your bug out bag was.
 

Dex

Constitutional Patriot
Yes good judgement is essential for the BoB. The article was a little too snarky to be easily readable. Overly sarcastic but generally on the mark.
 

Fred's Horseradish

Membership Revoked
I skimmed and left. I'm already bugged out but always looking for new suggestions for what to stock up on. I realize these writers are filling space and putting up startling headlines like: Europe is going w/n 2 weeks and we will be next, all our $ will be gone!
 

FarOut

Inactive
Yes good judgement is essential for the BoB. The article was a little too snarky to be easily readable. Overly sarcastic but generally on the mark.
I've been reading Ol' Remus for quite a while. Always thought he was too alarmist, now I believe he's on the mark. A very intelligent and insightful guy.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
Article was too glib, it's almost like the author was so impressed with his glibness that he forgot to include anything of substance?


ETA: Never mind, I see I'm the last in line to point out the obvious
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
yeah, pretty glib and written pretty sracastically, but meant to be a little humorous. Just trying to jump in on the 'prepper' craze that seems to have gone mainstream (in the media anyways..and still subtly) in about '07-8. Seems a little late to the parade. I bet the guy had never heard of a BOB 5 years ago.

had some pretty good one-liners though. Guys a poet/author at heart, not a great journalist.

eta: the 'bring good judgment' is like telling someone to 'always act in their best interest.' well. duh. But someone who doesn't have common sense cant necessarily bring it anywhere can they? And those who do have it, to whatever degree, usually try to apply it to whatever extent their capable of. So pretty much stating the obvious, the entire article was bait and swap to tell you how much he knows about prepping and bugging out and likely scenarios (very little we see) and further that his best plan is that really there's no sense in planning for what inevitably you have no idea, so he's just going to wait for disaster and let good sound judgment save the day. Tell me again which major metrotropolis area this guy lives in? Wonder what the demographic is? no reason. I'm pretty sure nobody who is carrying the 'good judgement' this guy is flouting will be taking bug out advise from him, or taking his article as anything more than msm journalism. I did enjoy this line though: "All in all, unassailable proof everyone's the hero of their own life story, Obama staffers excepted."
 
Last edited:

jehu

Mapper of Landmarks
This was a good job of entertainment writing.

He used a rapier when a broadsword would have done the job.

Or He shot a moose with a .22 - 38 times - and finished him off with a .50 cal muzzleloader.

He could have led with his last paragraph and finished with his last paragraph.


Common sense and good judgement are the best assets of any BOB.

Or in other words, "It does not matter what you have in your BOB, if you forget good judgement, you're screwed before you walk out the door".
 
Top