PLAY The Greatest Tactical General of All-time (photo fun - use your intuition)

Which is the greatest general?


  • Total voters
    60

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Someone actually went and money-balled military history. Ethan Arsht applied the principles of baseball sabermetrics to the performances of history’s greatest generals’ ability to win battles. It starts with comparing the number of wins from that general to a replacement general in the same circumstances.

The math is tricky but the list is definitive.

So, which general is at #1 all-time?

Photo “A” - Ulysses S. Grant
View attachment 415816

Photo “B” - Robert E. Lee
View attachment 415817

Photo “C” - Takeda Shingen
View attachment 415818

Photo “D” - Napoleon Bonaparte
View attachment 415819

None of the above.

Your title says “tactical” general. None of the above were “tactical.”

America’s greatest were Nathan Bedford Forest and George S. Patton.

OA
 

coalcracker

Veteran Member
Reveal:

I’m going to start by posting the link. This will give you access to all the results. You will have to type the general’s name into a search (instructions within the article at this link:

Napoleon was the Best General Ever, and the Math Proves it.

For what it’s worth, Grant had a higher score than Lee, but neither ranked first.
#2 - Julius Caesar
#3 - Arthur Wellesley
#4 - Takeda Shingen
#5 - Khalid Ibn Al-Walid
#6 - Hannibal Barca
#7 - Ulysses S. Grant
#8 - Frederick the Great
#9 - Georgy Zhukov
#10 - Alexander the Great

At # 1, by a decisive amount, is Napoleon Bonaparte. More details at the above link for those who are interested.

Congrats to our Memorial Day winners:
ADC2037B-5315-4703-995F-F5638B3C3D92.jpeg
 

Imrik

Veteran Member
Even though I’m a white southern boy, I was trained in many of the Samurai arts. Studied history, battle tactics etc. Numbers may say napoleon but pound for pound, I say shingen was a tough cookie.
 

Imrik

Veteran Member
And at least Takeda had the cajones to actually fight with his enemies. Any of those other guys actually fight the enemy commander?
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Not even close..........D Napoleon lead more battles by far in his success...........43 verses Lee's 27.

Napoleon was a freak about physics......wanted to know how far the projection of cannon balls and their kinetic energy and talked frequently to scientists like the great Laplace (physist) of his day to understand powder charges and distances.
 

Vegas321

Live free and survive
Lee’s other commanders failed him. Plus he didn’t have the materiel he needed to prosecute the battle properly.
Jeb Stewart failed him but Longstreet pleaded with Lee to go around the Right flank on day one and two. Lee refused, and did the famous frontal.
Must note, day 3 of Pickets charge. The southern cannons overshot the Union lines. Big mistake.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Takeda Shingen was Japanese, not Chinese.

As for the South, besides not having an industial base, and not being able to import what they needed they didn't have the available manpower to put in the field while the Union not only did but was recruiting men right off of the immigration ships that were still coming to northern ports.
And was hiring mercenaries, called Hessians (Germans).
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Jeb Stewart failed him but Longstreet pleaded with Lee to go around the Right flank on day one and two. Lee refused, and did the famous frontal.
Must note, day 3 of Pickets charge. The southern cannons overshot the Union lines. Big mistake.
A heavy metal band from Tampa hooked up with a philharmonic orchestra and did a 30 minute masterpiece about the whole event. Fun fact, the lead guitarist and founding member, Jon Schaffer, was arrested at Jan 6.

View: https://youtu.be/_qd3ff1Rtio
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
Been thinking abut this reply:
my answer: Jesus Christ. Had legions of angels at His beck and call, but took the hit for humanity all alone. The mighty Roman Empire fell as a result of His life And death. 2000 years later, nearly half of the planet’s population bend the knee in submission to His Kingdom, acknowledge Him as King, and none of is disciples recanted their Faith in Him as the true Son of God, despite torture and death for most of them. nobody else comes close.
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Been thinking abut this reply:
my answer: Jesus Christ. Had legions of angels at His beck and call, but took the hit for humanity all alone. The mighty Roman Empire fell as a result of His life And death. 2000 years later, nearly half of the planet’s population bend the knee in submission to His Kingdom, acknowledge Him as King, and none of is disciples recanted their Faith in Him as the true Son of God, despite torture and death for most of them. nobody else comes close.

You can't count God!

He's the best at everything.
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Julius Caesar (i.e., at the Battle of Alesia), Alexander, Rommel in WWI, and NB Forrest (look up Brice's Crossroads and his military assessment at Shiloh) all were far superior generals to those in the OP.

Example: https://www.warhistoryonline.com/wo...ant.html?chrome=1&Exc_D_LessThanPoint002_p1=1

"...Rommel’s men, over 52 hours of continuous combat had taken 18 miles of Italian territory, climbed 2 miles up mountains, captured a grand total of around 9,000 men, and had lost only six dead, and 30 wounded [out of under 200 troops Rommel had with him]. Rommel received an honorable mention in dispatches that day, and was later awarded the Pour le Mérite, Imperial Germany’s highest military honor. It was almost unheard of for this to be awarded to a mere Lieutenant."

Brice's Crossroads: NB Forrest was outnumbered over 2:1, and in a running fight (NOT with the advantage of fighting from fortifications) managed this:

Confederate losses:
96 killed
396 wounded

Invader losses:
223 killed
394 wounded
1,632 missing/captured
16 guns

1855 Yankees permanently lost to 96 Southern Patriots bravely fallen = a 19:1 ratio.
 
Last edited:

coalcracker

Veteran Member
The element that one must consider is that the statistical model known as Wins Above Replacement comes from baseball. It rewards quantity as well as quality.

For example, current NY Yankee superstar Aaron Judge, a once-in-a-generation talent, a future Hall of Fame inductee, a 6’7” giant who hits majestic homeruns, only ranks #550 on the all-time WAR list. He is clearly better than most of the names above him on that list. Judge is under contract to play the next nine years, so after all those “battles,” he will have accumulated many more victories and will have moved up far higher on the list.

I could post videos of Aaron Judge hitting a baseball like no other. Moonshots! Unbelievable blasts, but he just hasn’t been at the plate enough times to compete with “Napoleon,” the Babe Ruth of military generals.

The beauty of the mathematical metric is that it can and does compare players from different generations. The downside is that it measures quantity as well as quality.
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
B

The only reason IMO that the south lost the war was that they had no significant industrial capability.

Napoleon lost bigtime, and I don’t know the Chinese guy.
Well if they had skipped on a couple of battles and not have massive losses they would have lasted longer. Honestly had they invaded DC and kept it occupied early on they would have also likely won.
 

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
No such list can be complete without including Erich von Manstein.

Best
Doc
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Not even close..........D Napoleon lead more battles by far in his success...........43 verses Lee's 27.

Napoleon was a freak about physics......wanted to know how far the projection of cannon balls and their kinetic energy and talked frequently to scientists like the great Laplace (physist) of his day to understand powder charges and distances.

Number of battles shouldn't matter as much as what the victory entails.

Jan Sobieski saved Europe from being over run by Islam. Bonus points in my book.
 

hd5574

Veteran Member
None of the above...
I vote for General Stonewall Jackson...the last I heard his brilliant Valley campaigns were still studied at West Point...if he had lived things might have been quite different in PA....
He wasn't too bad at Manassas either. He was a West Point boy just like many of the Southern Generals...his West Point nickname was Beauty.
Since the military is now woke and he was a confederate general ...
He may not still be studied. ..if so their loss
 
Top