ALERT The Ebola Epidemic Is About to Get Worse. Much Worse.

Be Well

may all be well
and I believe it is to make some people very rich selling a vaccine.

The vax makers could have been working on an ebola vax for a long time but hardly any of them were. No $ in it. They like flu vax since they make a new one every year. Of course there's $ making opportunity here but I am 100% sure this guy was not brought here on purpose to make $ for pharma companies.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
There is something very, very important that the corporate media and public health officials are not telling you regarding the Ebola outbreak in west Africa.

The information I'm about to present here is frightening. There's really no way around that. However, I request that you do your very best to maintain a calm state of mind...



IMPORTANT UPDATE: August 13th: The CDC has admitted that the Ebola virus can travel through air, but they made that admission in a very sneaky and hard to find manner. The following statement is added as a footnote at the very bottom of the page:

Casual contact is defined as a) being within approximately 3 feet or within the room or care area for a prolonged period of time while not wearing recommended personal protective equipment or having direct brief contact (e.g., shaking hands) with an EVD case while not wearing recommended personal protective equipment.

The implication of this statement is very, very clear: Ebola DOES in fact travel through the air. This is critical information and it should be highlighted in large letters on every page, but instead it is tucked away in fine print where many won't look. Given the fact that the CDC previously was running infographic campaigns claiming that Ebola does not travel through the air (see image below) this is highly irresponsible on their part.


http://scgnews.com/ebola-what-youre-not-being-told

Which is what I believe CDC Director Frieden was TRYING to get out, hinting at, by his statement yesterday about "We all breathe the same air...."

He was IMMEDIATELY CALLED ON THAT by the Texas Health Dept. doctor, and make a stammering, flustered, no-eye-contact-with-the-audience 'correction' that was even MORE odd; he said: "(ebola) DOES NOT SPREAD BY ANY OTHER ROUTE THAT WE’VE SEEN IN ANY OUTBREAK".

I think he was TRYING to get the truth out in SPITE of his "handlers" and whoever (whatever) TPTB "are" who seem to WANT the public fat, happy, and stupid until they DIE---but today he was almost MANICALLY back on track with his interview with Sanjay Gupta where he was smiling like someone high on coke and gesturing wildly and (again) MANICALLY re-assuring all of us that we CAN'T get ebola without TOUCHING a person who has it.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
I'm still skeptical about the "airborne" person to person transmission. I'm unaware of any empirical evidence demonstrating that as a fact. We of course do have evidence of it spreading that way in animals. Ebola Reston was discovered in Virginia in 89 and was thought to be airborne due to it killing the monkeys in 2 different parts of a building that were connected by air ducts.

The 2012 research you are referencing still does not prove HTH transmission. Just playing devils advocate. It may very well have recombined or mutated to be airborne but at this point there is no evidence. If that were the case HUNDREDS of health care workers would have contracted it because most of them are not wearing level 4 gear. From what I've seen it's really more like 3 1/2. They aren't wearing oxygen tanks, they are wearing extra coverage surgical masks. There is nothing in the scientific community showing evidence of airborne HTH transmission. It's pure speculation.

Having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if this strain was air borne due to being engineered that way as a bio-weapon but I really think if that were the case we would see a LOT more health care workers dead from it.

I fail to see why you say the 2012 study has "no evidence."

The 2009 Canadian Health Services study was with Ebola Reston.

The 2012 study was under the same conditions with Ebola Zaire (the current strain).

In BOTH cases, mammals NOT IN DIRECT CONTACT with one another, but which shared the same "air" via being in the same room and using the same air-conditioning system, transferred the virus from the pigs (on the ground) to the macques (monkeys in CAGES suspended ABOVE and OUT OF REACH OF the pigs--and their secretions or refuse).

The 2012 study clearly states the virus was found IN THE LUNGS of the macaques---meaning it was transmitted to them and BREATHED in---meaning via the AIR.


This was a SCIENTIFIC study, published in a respected science journal---not some 'woo' site.

What is your basis for saying it does not "prove" transmission---other than simply refusing to accept the results the study showed?
 

Hansa44

Justine Case
Here's a very interesting article. And the man that was talking at the conference received a standing ovation.











Hold onto your hats! And yes, I know it was written in 2006! Looks like they had plenty of time to prepare!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/f...ay-ecologist-who-said-ebola-the-solution-to-h

Thu Apr 6, 2006 - 12:15 pm EST

FBI Interested in Texas “Doomsday” Ecologist who said Ebola the Solution to Human Overpopulation









AUSTIN, April 6, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Ebola, a form of hemorrhagic fever in which the internal organs of the victim liquefy, has one of the highest rates of fatality of any known contagious disease at approximately 80-90% and is one of the most contagious diseases known to medical science. It is also high on the list of possible bio-terror weapons of concern to international law enforcement and military security agencies. Tom Clancy’s thriller novel, Rainbow Six describes a group of radical environmentalists that wants to rid the world of people using a modified version of Ebola.

All of which is why the FBI is interested in talking to Texas ecologist and herpetologist, Dr. Eric R. Pianka, who suggested at a meeting of the Texas Academy of Sciences that an airborne version of Ebola that would wipe out 90% of the human population was the solution to the human “overpopulation problem.”

This week, Pianka has been in the Texas media saying that he was not advocating bio-terrorism, but also told the Austin Statesman that he is meeting with local FBI officials in response to complaints that he is advocating biological terrorism.

“Someone has reported me as a terrorist,” he said. “They think I’m forming a cadre of people to release the airborne Ebola virus into the air. That I’m the leader and my students are the followers.”

On the day he was named by the Academy as 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist, Pianka declared that AIDS was not killing off the surplus human population fast enough. What is needed, he said, is Ebola to kill 5.8 billion of the world’s 6 billion plus humans. The speech received a prolonged standing ovation at the Academy’s annual meeting at Lamar University in Beaumont.

The Seguin Gazette quotes Pianka saying, “Every one of you who gets to survive has to bury nine.”Â

”[Disease] will control the scourge of humanity,” Pianka said in his March 3 speech. “We’re looking forward to a huge collapse.” He said, “We’ve grown fat, apathetic and miserable,” and described the world as a “fat, human biomass.”

The syllabus for one of Pianka’s courses reads, “Although [Ebola Zaire] Kills 9 out of 10 people, outbreaks have so far been unable to become epidemics because they are currently spread only by direct physical contact with infected blood…Ebola Reston, is airborne, and it is only a matter of time until Ebola Zaire evolves the capacity to be airborne.”

The speech was first reported by popular science and computer writer, Forrest Mims III on the website of the Citizen Scientist. Mims said he was concerned that in this age of international security tensions, “fertile young minds,” might take Pianka’s assertions as suggestions.

One class evaluation for one of Pianka’s courses shows the enthusiasm with which his ideas are received by ‘fertile young minds. Two quoted by the Seguin Gazette read, “the most incredible class I ever had” and “Pianka is a GOD!”

After the talk, student blogger, Brenna McConnell, who attended the Academy talk wrote, “He’s basically advocating for the death for all but 10 percent of the current population. And at the risk of sounding just as radical, I think he’s right.”

To the possibility that someone would actually go with the idea, Pianka said, “Good terrorists would be taking [Ebola Reston and Ebola Zaire] so that they had microbes they could let loose on the Earth that would kill 90 percent of people.”

Read previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Texas “Doomsday Ecologist” Calls for 90% of Humans to be Wiped out with Ebola Virus
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/apr/06040306.html

Read a transcript of Pianka’s March 3 talk:
http://www.pearceyreport.com/archives/2006/04/transcript_dr_d.php/
 

ainitfunny

Saved, to glorify God.
If you are NOT horrified by Ebola YET, and still think the West Africans are NOT going to the "Treatment Centers" because they are stooges, just stupid, superstitious, savages suspicious of government . THINK AGAIN

Countrymouse, in another thread gives a link to a reporter (with photographs) verifying horrible treatment and conditions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/w...ter&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article&_r=0#

WASN'T I RIGHT IN MY EARLIER POST ABOUT TREATING THE PATIENTS LIKE "The ENEMY!?"
\I warned you all in an earlier post that African Leaders have "set the tone" of the response BY SAYING THAT VICTIMS WERE THE ENEMY. Of course it seems, THAT staff mindset and a collapsed medical system have worked together to EMPOWER the evil that has given damn GOOD REASON to the citizens to absolutely not entrust themselves to people who fear them, and see them as "THE PROBLEM", want them dead, lock them up with little or no care whatsoever until they die!!

My God, the reporter gives an eyewitness account of STAFF IN THE "TREATMENT CENTER" KICKING THE NEGLECTED ILL PEOPLE to ascertain if they are "DEAD YET?"
 
Last edited:

China Connection

TB Fanatic
Growing concerns over 'in the air' transmission of Ebola
By Matt McGrath Science reporter, BBC World Service


http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-20341423

Ebola virus The infection is thought to get into humans through close contact with bodily fluids


Canadian scientists have shown that the deadliest form of the ebola virus could be transmitted by air between species.

In experiments, they demonstrated that the virus was transmitted from pigs to monkeys without any direct contact between them.

The researchers say they believe that limited airborne transmission might be contributing to the spread of the disease in some parts of Africa.

They are concerned that pigs might be a natural host for the lethal infection.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

What we suspect is happening is large droplets - they can stay in the air, but not long, they don't go far. But they can be absorbed in the airway”

Dr Gary Kobinger Public Health Agency of Canada

Ebola viruses cause fatal haemorrhagic fevers in humans and many other species of non human primates.

Details of the research were published in the journal Scientific Reports.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the infection gets into humans through close contact with the blood, secretions, organs and other bodily fluids from a number of species including chimpanzees, gorillas and forest antelope.

The fruit bat has long been considered the natural reservoir of the infection. But a growing body of experimental evidence suggests that pigs, both wild and domestic, could be a hidden source of Ebola Zaire - the most deadly form of the virus.

Now, researchers from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and the country's Public Health Agency have shown that pigs infected with this form of Ebola can pass the disease on to macaques without any direct contact between the species.

In their experiments, the pigs carrying the virus were housed in pens with the monkeys in close proximity but separated by a wire barrier. After eight days, some of the macaques were showing clinical signs typical of ebola and were euthanised.

One possibility is that the monkeys became infected by inhaling large aerosol droplets produced from the respiratory tracts of the pigs.
pigs could be a natural host Pigs could act as a host and amplify the Ebola virus

One of the scientists involved is Dr Gary Kobinger from the National Microbiology Laboratory at the Public Health Agency of Canada. He told BBC News this was the most likely route of the infection.

"What we suspect is happening is large droplets - they can stay in the air, but not long, they don't go far," he explained.

"But they can be absorbed in the airway and this is how the infection starts, and this is what we think, because we saw a lot of evidence in the lungs of the non-human primates that the virus got in that way."

The scientists say that their findings could explain why some pig farmers in the Philippines had antibodies in their system for the presence of a different version of the infection called Ebola Reston. The farmers had not been involved in slaughtering the pigs and had no known contact with contaminated tissues.

Dr Kobinger stresses that the transmission in the air is not similar to influenza or other infections. He points to the experience of most human outbreaks in Africa.

"The reality is that they are contained and they remain local, if it was really an airborne virus like influenza is it would spread all over the place, and that's not happening."
Hidden host

The authors believe that more work needs to be done to clarify the role of wild and domestic pigs in spreading the virus. There have been anecdotal accounts of pigs dying at the start of human outbreaks. Dr Kobinger believes that if pigs do play a part, it could help contain the virus.

"If they do play a role in human outbreaks it would be a very easy point to intervene" he said. "It would be easier to vaccinate pigs against Ebola than humans."
Ebola Uganda Workers prepare to disinfect during a recent Ebola outbreak in Uganda

Other experts in the field were concerned about the idea that Ebola was susceptible to being transmitted by air even if the distance the virus could travel was limited. Dr Larry Zeitlin is the president of Mapp Biopharmaceuticals.

"It's an impressive study that not only raises questions about the reservoir of Ebola in the wild, but more importantly elevates concerns about ebola as a public health threat," he told BBC News. "The thought of airborne transmission is pretty frightening."

At present, an outbreak of ebola in Uganda has killed at least two people near the capital Kampala. Last month, Uganda declared itself Ebola-free after an earlier outbreak of the disease killed at least sixteen people in the west of the country.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-20341423
 

China Connection

TB Fanatic
A little background is in order.

The ability of Ebola to spread without direct contact with an infected individual, and whether or not it is efficiently spread through air, are different issues.

It’s already possible that Ebola can spread, in rare cases, through direct contact with respiratory secretions. This might occur, for example, when an infected person coughs or sneezes directly on another, uninfected individual. The Centers for Disease Control specifically recommends “droplet protection” be taken in the hospital setting when healthcare workers are treating patients infected with Ebola. This kind of direct spread is sometimes referred to as “droplet contact,” but it’s distinct from airborne spread.

When a viral infection becomes “airborne,” like ordinary influenza, it means that discharged microbes remain suspended in the air for long periods of time. Generally speaking, this is what is meant by “airborne transmission.” In this case, the organisms must be capable of surviving for long periods of time outside the body and must be resistant to drying. Airborne transmission allows organisms to enter the upper and lower respiratory tracts. This sort of transmission is sometimes also referred to as “droplet contact” or “viral droplet nuclei transmission.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottgottlieb/2014/09/03/can-ebola-go-airborne/
 

China Connection

TB Fanatic

How Do You Catch Ebola: By Air, Sweat Or Water?

by Linda Poon
September 12, 2014 1:12 PM ET
A mock patient is wheeled in an isolation pod during a drill at the biocontainment unit in the Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.

A mock patient is wheeled in an isolation pod during a drill at the biocontainment unit in the Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.
Nati Harnik/AP

There's no question Ebola is one of the most terrifying diseases out there. It causes a painful death, typically kills more than 50 percent of those infected and essentially has no cure.

But if you compare how contagious the Ebola virus is to, say SARS or the measles, Ebola just doesn't stack up. In fact, the virus is harder to catch than the common cold.

That's because there has been no evidence that Ebola spreads between people through the air. Health experts repeatedly emphasize that human-to-human transmission requires direct contact with infected bodily fluids, including blood, vomit and feces.

And to infect, those fluids have to reach a break in the skin or the mucous membranes found around your eyes, mouth and nose.
The fatality rate in an Ebola outbreak ranges from 25 percent to 90 percent.
13.7: Cosmos And Culture
Why Are We So Scared Of Ebola?
Medical workers with the nonprofit Doctors Without Borders treat a patient for Ebola in Gueckedou, Guinea. Despite their protective gear, the workers try to maintain human contact with patients by talking with them and getting close enough to look into their eyes.
Goats and Soda
Ebola 101: The Facts Behind A Frightening Virus

But that hasn't stopped two-thirds of Americans from thinking that the virus spreads "easily," a poll from Harvard School of Public Health found in August. Almost 40 percent of the 1,025 people surveyed said they worry about an Ebola epidemic in the U.S. More than a quarter were concerned about catching the virus themselves.

Many questions still linger. Is Ebola really not airborne? Can it spread through contaminated water? What about through a drop of blood left behind on a table?

So we took those questions to two virologists: Alan Schmaljohn at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Jean-Paul Gonzalez at Metabiota, a company that tracks global infectious diseases.

Is the Ebola virus really not airborne?

With airborne illnesses, like influenza or tuberculosis, you can easily get sick by inhaling tiny pathogenic particles floating around in the air. But with Ebola, large droplets — which neither travel very far nor hang in the air for long — are the real risk factors.

That means an Ebola-infected person would likely have to cough or sneeze up blood or other bodily fluids directly in your face for you to catch the virus, Schmaljohn says. If that drop of blood doesn't land on your face, it will just fall to the ground. It won't be swimming in the air, waiting to be breathed in by an unsuspecting passerby.

During the 1995 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention followed 173 family members of 27 people infected with the virus. Seventy-eight people had no direct contact with an infected person, but they could have been exposed to Ebola through the air. None got infected.

The 28 family members who did get sick all had some sort of physical contact with an ill person.

"We've known for years that Ebola can be transmitted through direct contact with infected bodily fluids," Gonzalez says. "This is very clear, only direct contact."

So why does the question of airborne transmission keep coming up?

Well, "airborne" is a broad term that simply means "transported by air." If a drop of infected blood is sprayed directly from a needle to a person, then yes that contagious droplet was technically carried through the air.

But there is "no convincing epidemiological evidence that airborne transmission occurs from an infected person to a nearby non-infected person," Schmaljohn says.
Members of a Red Cross burial team are disinfected after removing the body of an apparent Ebola victim from a home in Pendembu, Sierra Leone.
Goats and Soda
You Asked Questions About Ebola — And We Have Answers
An illustration of animals native to Africa.
Goats and Soda
You Won't Catch Ebola From A Giraffe In Tanzania

The confusion surrounding this topic, he adds, is well-deserved, in part because health officials often try to simplify their messages. So they don't spend much time fleshing out "exceptions and extraordinary possibilities," he says.

"As they simplify it, they start to sound like an absolute," Schmaljohn says. "And people are smart enough to disbelieve absolutes."

He says to think about the methods of Ebola transmission as high-risk or low-risk. There's a high risk, for example, of catching Ebola if you shake hands with an infected patient and a very low one if that same person coughs or sneezes around you.

[Note: A study in 2012 showed infected pigs passed on the Ebola to monkeys without touching them. Besides the fact that people aren't pigs or monkeys, the lead author has pointed out it's possible the monkeys caught the virus when droplets from the pigs splashed into their cage during cleaning.

The authors also noted that pigs can generate large infectious droplets better than any other animal. And airborne transmission of Ebola between monkeys has never been observed.]

Although it's clear that Ebola is passed through bodily fluids, are some fluids more effective transmitters than others?

The virus is most abundant in blood and diarrhea. In fact, a milliliter of blood typically carries about a million infectious particles. And in a controlled lab, just a small drop of blood from an infected monkey can be strong enough to kill a million of its companions, Schmaljohn says.

A CDC study in 2007 found that Ebola is shed through other bodily fluids during the illness, such as saliva, breast milk and semen. In most cases, these fluids were not visibly contaminated by blood, but they still contained the virus. That study didn't look at sweat, but another one suggested that Ebola could be passed on through sweat.

Researchers suspect the amount of Ebola in these other fluids, like saliva and sweat, to be much lower.

How long can Ebola virus particles survive in a drop of blood on a surface outside the body?

A drop of blood can remain contagious outside the body. And virus particles can survive for days or weeks, depending on the environment. Ultraviolet light, heat and exposure to oxygen gradually deactivate the virus, while cooler temperatures and humidity help keep it active.

"Blood, once it's outside the body, contains all the virus it's ever going to contain," Schmaljohn adds. "It's all downhill from there [for Ebola]."
A burial team in Barkedu, Liberia, buries their protective clothing alongside the body of an Ebola victim. It's possible to catch the virus from clothing soiled by infected blood or other bodily fluids. i

A burial team in Barkedu, Liberia, buries their protective clothing alongside the body of an Ebola victim. It's possible to catch the virus from clothing soiled by infected blood or other bodily fluids.
Tommy Trenchard for NPR

So yes, there's a risk you can catch Ebola from a drop of blood on a table. But that risk diminishes over time as the blood dries up. Still, he stresses, surface decontamination is necessary in practice.

Can Ebola be spread through a drop of water or carried through the water system?

"[The virus] will not remain for a long time in the water," Gonzalez says. "It's not a very rich medium to protect the virus."

It's important, he adds, to remember that viruses aren't as resistant outside the body as bacteria are. Rather, they depend heavily on the cells of their host — animal or human — for survival.

In water, the Ebola virus would be deactivated in a matter of minutes, Schmaljohn says. That's because each Ebola virus is encased in an envelope taken from the outer surface, or membrane, of a host cell.

So what about cells in water that are infected with Ebola? Could you get the virus from infected cells in contaminated water?

Infected cells don't live long inside a liquid that doesn't have the same salt concentration as in our bodily fluids.

Drinking water has a lower salt concentration than that found inside human cells. As water rushes inside the cell to balance the salt concentration, pressure builds ups. Eventually the cell bursts, killing the virus in the process.

How long does an infected corpse remain contagious?

A long time — although it's still unknown exactly how long.

Remember, virus particles can last for days and even weeks in a drop of blood. So inside the entire body of the deceased patient, the virus can probably remain active for several months, Gonzalez says.

"That's why it's very important to [perform] the burial as soon as possible," he adds. And to be extremely careful while doing it.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandso.../how-do-you-catch-ebola-by-air-sweat-or-water
 

China Connection

TB Fanatic
If it is like the hepatitis virus which they say it is then here are ways it can spread.


How does hepatitis A spread?

Hepatitis A occurs when the hepatitis A virus is taken in by mouth. The virus then multiplies in the liver and is passed in the faeces. An infected person's hands can become contaminated after using the toilet and the virus then spreads by direct contact, or by food, beverages and other objects that were handled by the infected person, such as cups and spoons.

For example, hepatitis A can spread when people:

Don't wash their hands thoroughly after going to the toilet or changing nappies.
Eat non-cooked foods, such as salads, which have been contaminated by being handled by an infectious person.
Eat shellfish from contaminated waters.
Drink contaminated water.

Hepatitis A may also be spread sexually if there is contact with the anal area of anyone who is infectious.


Acute Hepatitis A

Historically, acute hepatitis A rates vary cyclically, with nationwide increases every 10-15 years. The last peak was in 1995; since that time, rates of hepatitis A have generally declined. In 2012, a total of 1,562 cases of acute hepatitis A were reported nationwide to CDC (Table 2.1). The overall incidence rate for 2012 was 0.5 cases per 100,000 population. No data were available for 2012 from the District of Columbia.
 

China Connection

TB Fanatic
What is the Ebola virus?

Most people's views of Ebola are probably informed by Hollywood — they think of it as a deadly and contagious virus that swirls around the world, striking everyone in its path and causing them to hemorrhage from their eyeballs, ears and mouth until there is no more blood to spill.

outbreak

Remember this 1995 film?

In reality, Ebola is something quite different. About half of the people who contract Ebola die. The others return to a normal life after a months-long recovery that can include periods of hair loss, sensory changes, weakness, fatigue, headaches, eye and liver inflammation.

As for the blood: While Ebola can cause people to hemorrhage, about half of Ebola sufferers ever experience that Biblical bleeding that's become synonymous with the virus.

More often than not, Ebola strikes like the worst and most humiliating flu you could imagine. People get the sweats, along with body aches and pains. Then they start vomiting and having uncontrollable diarrhea. These symptoms can appear anywhere between two and 21 days after exposure to the virus. Sometimes, they go into shock. Sometimes, they bleed. Again, about half of those infected with the virus die, and this usually happens fairly quickly — within a few days or a couple of weeks of getting sick.

There are five strains of Ebola, four of which have caused the disease in humans: Zaire, Sudan, Taï Forest, and Bundibugyo. The fifth, Reston, has infected nonhuman primates only. Though scientists haven't been able to confirm this, the animal host of Ebola is widely believed to be the fruit bat, and the virus only seldomly makes the leap into humans.

The Ebola virus is extremely rare. Among the leading causes of death in Africa, it only accounts for a tiny fraction. People are much more likely to die from AIDS, respiratory infections, or diarrhea, as you can see.

Africa_death_causes_revised.0.png


The current outbreak involves the Zaire strain, which was discovered in 1976 — the year Ebola was first identified in what was then Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo). That same year, the virus was also discovered in South Sudan.

Since 1976, there have only been about 20 known Ebola outbreaks. Until last year, the total impact of these outbreaks included 2,357 cases and 1,548 deaths, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They all occurred in isolated or remote areas of Africa, and Ebola never had a chance to go very far.

And that's what makes the 2014 outbreak so remarkable: the virus has spread to five countries in Africa plus America, and has already infected more than 6,200 people. It has killed more than 3,000 people. That is more than double the sum total of all previous outbreaks combined.

http://www.vox.com/2014/9/29/685170...ed-ebola-on-why-this-epidemic-spiraled-out-of
 

NoPlugsNM

Deceased
Looking at the chart - Leading causes of death in Africa - it reminds me of the same/similar chart of just about every nation. If you consider diseases like 'cancer', which encompasses several types of cancers, you never see deaths due to cancer, or even the specific types, or you see very low numbers associated with it like the bottom of the list reflected as the numbers for Ebola, this happens specifically because people die from secondary causes/reasons and that is what the death is attributed to, not the specific itself UNLESS the person has received no treatment whatsoever for their specific illness/disease. Most cancer patients who received chemo treatments die from a stroke/subdural hematoma or a secondary respiratory infection due to a feeding tube. So, those high respiratory infection numbers, diarrhea numbers, and a few other things in Africa could actually be a reflection of Ebola, meaning the last straw that led to death. The system is designed to hide true underlying disease data and only show what ended someone's life specifically.



NP
 
Top