Henry Bowman
Veteran Member
Sorry to hear this about your Mom.
There are no coincidences with this thing.
Just imagine what it does to ones DNA. It may not show up in time with the elderly but younger people will more than likely have issues.
CORONA The Demonization of the “vaccine hesitant”
- Thread starter coalcracker
- Start date
There are no coincidences with this thing.
Just imagine what it does to ones DNA. It may not show up in time with the elderly but younger people will more than likely have issues.
And some people are just ignorant. .
Ignorant people resort to name calling because they're not smart enough to have any factual data or sources.
Where in the hell do you think all the research facilities and labs got their corona virus samples to conduct research how various drugs including Ivermectin, hydroxy and others affect Corona virus.
Yeah the virus was isolated and cultured last year in Jan 2020 and samples were sent to research labs all over the country.
And you think all the labs and research facilities that are conducting research on Covid, including those testing Ivermectin are lying and aren't really researching anything. Do you have any proof of this or are you just "blowing" smoke?
Some people wouldn't know a fact if it was shoved it up their ass sideways. They are happy as long as there's a convenient unsubstantiated conspiracy theory they can wrap their little minds around, as long as no real knowledge is required.
As far as changing guidance. . . guidance changes as the knowledge changes.
Most people who work in scientific fields understand this, those that work in more menial positions often don't and are content to continue to hit their head against the wall of ignorance and somehow expect different results.
Demanding immediate, simplistic, never changing answers to complex questions in science is the mark of idiots, but the world abounds with them.
Bottom line: Covid virus has been isolated and culture over a year ago. That's how all the research facilities and labs are able to conduct tests on the efficacy of various drugs against the covid virus. Any idiot knows this.
Border Collie Dad
Flat Earther
You want some for research?
Samples have been available from the CDC since Feb 2020. to qualified labs with proper safeguards in place.
I really don't understand people constantly parroting this misinformation.
The virus was cultured in American labs in Jan2020 and enough was produced to offer samples to various labs and research facilities around the country one month later in Feb
"Isolate"
bartp40
Veteran Member
Getting closer..... vaxed vs unvaxed.....
Luke 12:53 - The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
Luke 12:53 - The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
TammyinWI
Talk is cheap
Organic Consumers Association Presents: COVID-19 Tribunal Exposing Willful Misconduct
Learn How YOU Can Take Action
<Disclaimer: I am going to tap into this and take notes. If there are any wonky new age items in it, I plan on disregarding...but they may not even go there...I feel that a person will be able to glean some true empowerment strategies that will be helpful>
LIVE STREAMING EVENT – APRIL 28 @ 8PM EST / 5PM PST
It’s now been well over a year since the SARS-CoV-2 virus came into public awareness, with what began as “2 weeks to flatten the curve,” only to raise more and more questions each passing month some 14 long months later, with fast approaching policy and societal parameters that would enslave and mandate humanity into servitude to an industry that holds no liability for experimental products.
This exclusive event features a panel of expert scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys gathered together to share their extraordinary research and insights into the most important topic of our lifetime.
Reserve Your Seat Now
Wednesday, April 28th 8pm EST
Mark your calendars with a reminder for Wednesday, April 28th, at 8:00 p.m. EST/ 5:00 p.m. PST, for this two-hour streaming, FREE event! Invite your family, friends, neighbors, colleagues, and city, county and state policy makers in your area!
Learn More About This Must-See Event - About This Tribunal Event
This must-see Tribunal with world-renowned experts will deliberate upon extensive research into the Origins & Ethics of, Authoritarian Government Responses to & Evidence-Based Treatments for COVID-19.
Our mission is to educate and empower you, the public, to take action and make your voice heard! You have rights and we’ll show you how to use them.
Learn More About This Must-See Event
About This Tribunal Event
This must-see Tribunal with world-renowned experts will deliberate upon extensive research into the Origins & Ethics of, Authoritarian Government Responses to & Evidence-Based Treatments for COVID-19.
Our mission is to educate and empower you, the public, to take action and make your voice heard! You have rights and we’ll show you how to use them.
<List of speakers at link>
Collectively our panelists have invested over 75,000 hours into the myriad of events that make up the global response to COVID-19 from the likely origins to where we currently find ourselves ensnared within a web of highly questionable science and acts of alleged willful misconduct with no seeming end in sight.
The event speakers have published numerous books and peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts on the subject of COVID-19 that currently form the foundation of many ongoing legal efforts attempting to protect the inalienable rights of an entire nation.
During the event, we will ask the hard questions that perhaps should have been asked long ago by a mainstream media network consistently vacating their duty to impartially investigate and objectively inform their audiences.
Some of the questions proposed may feel uncomfortable at first, but are nevertheless essential to our collective freedom and our children’s future.
Join us as we explore the most pressing matter at hand that is impacting all of humanity!
DON'T MISS THIS EXCLUSIVE EVENT!
Exposing Willful Misconduct: Learn How YOU Can Take Action & Reclaim Your Health Sovereignty
This exclusive event features a panel of expert scientists, doctors, authors, activists and attorneys gathered together to share their extraordinary research and insights into the most important topic of our lifetime.truth.organicconsumers.org
Replying to my own post, lol. I missed the beginning of this pesentation, so, I am very glad that they will have it available on replay! Will have to watch it this weekend.
TammyinWI
Talk is cheap
Prayers said for you and your mom.
TammyinWI
Talk is cheap
Smart kid, and I think it is innate, that is how God wired people. Mom is smart not to persist, and try to force it.
Continuing to pray against all of this evil, often, and for the deep state not to succeed any more with their evil, sick agendas!
danielboon
TB Fanatic
It INDEED is the spiritual warfare is very strong
coalcracker
Veteran Member
Phone call today from a friend. His wife just got out of the hospital after a battle with Covid. “Funny thing,” he said, “is she caught Covid right after getting her first vaccine shot.”
iboya
Veteran Member
Not sure if this has been posted already. Apologizes if its a dup.
Fair use cited
www.thenation.com
The Military Can’t Get Troops to Take the Covid Vaccine. Come Again?
Service members aren’t getting the vaccine. That’s a problem, and it’s more complicated than you’d expect.
By Andrew McCormickTwitter
MARCH 1, 2021
Basic training graduation. (Kemberly Groue / US Air Force, Defense Department)
About one-third of military service members are refusing to take the coronavirus vaccine. In some units, refusal rates exceed half of all members. At a time when the virus remains as dangerous as ever, that’s bananas. Yet the military says troops who decline the vaccine will face no repercussions or changes to their assigned duties, meaning even uninoculated troops will remain deployable around the country and the world. What the hell?
The deal is, federal law prohibits the mandatory application of medicines within the military that are not fully licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration. The three coronavirus vaccines currently available in the United States—the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and, as of Saturday, the Johnson & Johnson versions—are approved on “emergency use authorizations,” meaning the drugs are technically still experimental. Full approval could take years, during which time hundreds of thousands of service members will apparently remain susceptible to, and potentially vectors of, Covid-19.
There’s good reason for this law. The government and military have nasty histories of experimenting on people, including service members, without their knowledge or consent. And in fact, the law has been put to the test.
In 1997, the military instituted a mandatory vaccination program for anthrax. Upon receiving that vaccine, huge numbers of service members complained of debilitating side effects. (The vaccine may also have been a factor in what’s known as “Gulf War syndrome,” a multi-symptom illness of unknown origin related to service in the 1991 war.) Lawsuits ensued, and in 2004 the D.C. Circuit court determined that the government had violated federal law by mandating the medicine, specifically because the vaccine in question was proven to prevent cutaneous anthrax infection, though the military sought to prevent against inhalation anthrax, the most deadly form of the disease and the one most likely to be associated with a bio-attack. But the FDA hadn’t adequately studied the vaccine’s use against inhalation anthrax, the court found, meaning it didn’t meet the standard for mandatory military distribution.
Following further testing, mandatory anthrax vaccinations resumed in 2007, with troops risking court-martial and even separation from the service if they refused the vaccine. (Fun fact: Jake Angeli, the Viking-helmeted “QAnon shaman” of Capitol riot infamy, was kicked out of the Navy in late 2007, after two years as an enlisted sailor, for this very reason, according to Task & Purpose.)
With the coronavirus vaccine, the Pentagon surely would want to avoid similar, protracted legal battles. Military leaders have expressed frustration at low vaccine acceptance rates—the AP reported they had hoped the military might serve as an example to the public. But the law is clear.
There are critical and obvious differences, though, between the anthrax case and America’s present predicament, which should cause the government to reconsider its approach.
First, during the last major anthrax scare in the United States, in 2001, the disease killed five people. Covid-19 has killed more than 500,000 Americans, with more deaths in January 2021 than during any previous month of the pandemic.
Second, anthrax is not contagious. Coronavirus, clearly, is. And new, even more infectious—and more virulent—variants are on the rise. That in mind, it’s worth noting the military is a highly mobile profession, and that service members aren’t self-contained on bases. Many live off-base and often, as a group, play significant roles in their respective communities. In other words, an unvaccinated troop poses a risk to more than only their fellow service members. It’s not clear if service members refusing the vaccine will participate in the military’s efforts to distribute the vaccine domestically, though that would be ironic. I asked the Pentagon about this. “That’s a good question,” a public affairs officer told me, though an emailed request for further comment went unanswered.
And third, many service members aren’t giving very good reasons for refusing the vaccine. With anthrax, there were serious questions about the vaccine’s efficacy and evidence of significant side-effects. By contrast, evidence from large vaccine trials and more than 24 million completed vaccinations in the United States so far show that the coronavirus vaccines are very safe (even if the second doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can pack a wallop). Fears about side effects from the coronavirus vaccine are only natural, and military leaders should address them compassionately. But some members refusing the vaccine are instead citing misinformation, such as that the vaccine is a tracking device (it isn’t); partisan objections, in the same way that some view masks as a political statement (they aren’t); and even the novelty of self-determination. “The Army tells me what, how, and when to do almost everything,” one soldier told The New York Times. “They finally asked me to do something and I actually have a choice, so I said no.”
In the seven years I spent in the US Navy, I was vaccinated for at least anthrax, smallpox, hepatitis A and B, typhoid, yellow fever, and, every year, the flu. When my unit was deployed to East Africa, under Special Operations Command, we were given pills to prevent against malaria. These were said, perhaps apocryphally, to cause bizarre dreams and mood swings, so most of us left the pills in the bottle. Then a few guys actually got malaria. The commanding general was furious. New guidance from my boss was: “It’s funny. If you get malaria, it’ll be the general who kills you.” We took the pills.
Now, commanders are jumping through hoops to push the coronavirus vaccine. They’re convening town halls, hosting question-and-answer information sessions, and posting photos and videos of themselves receiving shots. The message: Please, please follow our lead.
It’s an uncomfortable position for leaders, in an organization that hinges on an expectation of compliance. One commanding officer in the Washington, D.C., area told me that the optional vaccine has also opened a door to obvious partisanship and misinformation in the ranks. This officer has strenuously encouraged subordinates to receive the vaccine but is hamstrung by an influential member of the command who declined it because, this person said, “it feels partisan.” In any other circumstance, it would be incumbent on a leader to squash rhetoric like this, as a matter of what the military calls “good order and discipline.”
There are impacts on operations, too. If a member who refuses the vaccine winds up testing positive for the virus—not an unlikely scenario, with cases still high—that person is of course moved to quarantine. An unequal burden then falls on troops who did take the vaccine, who must flex to cover the infected member’s duties. Another officer relayed a story to me in which an unvaccinated sailor was due to be deployed but contracted the coronavirus and ultimately missed the unit’s departure.
Mandatory vaccination may not be the answer, but clearly something is broken here.
More practically, and soon, the Defense Department should confer additional tools to military leaders to help compel vaccine acceptance. The military could introduce incentives for taking the vaccine, in the form of financial bonuses—like some US companies have done—or time off (the military loves time off). Or, without making the vaccine mandatory, commanders could be empowered to relegate subordinates who refuse the vaccine to a limited set of duties. Those troops could also be required to live on base, in barracks, until they receive the vaccine, or until the spread of the virus has declined significantly. (To readers not in the know: This is a near-nuclear suggestion; it would have the desired effect.) Importantly, the latter two proposals shouldn’t be viewed as reprisal. They’re commonsense measures, to the benefit of public health. And common sense, at least, should not be optional.
Andrew McCormickTWITTERAndrew McCormick is an independent journalist in Washington, D.C. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The Atlantic, Columbia Journalism Review, and the South China Morning Post, among other publications. He is a US Navy veteran.
Fair use cited
The Military Can’t Get Troops to Take the Covid Vaccine. Come Again?
Service members aren’t getting the vaccine. That’s a problem, and it’s more complicated than you’d expect.
www.thenation.com
The Military Can’t Get Troops to Take the Covid Vaccine. Come Again?
Service members aren’t getting the vaccine. That’s a problem, and it’s more complicated than you’d expect.
By Andrew McCormickTwitter
MARCH 1, 2021
Basic training graduation. (Kemberly Groue / US Air Force, Defense Department)
About one-third of military service members are refusing to take the coronavirus vaccine. In some units, refusal rates exceed half of all members. At a time when the virus remains as dangerous as ever, that’s bananas. Yet the military says troops who decline the vaccine will face no repercussions or changes to their assigned duties, meaning even uninoculated troops will remain deployable around the country and the world. What the hell?
The deal is, federal law prohibits the mandatory application of medicines within the military that are not fully licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration. The three coronavirus vaccines currently available in the United States—the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and, as of Saturday, the Johnson & Johnson versions—are approved on “emergency use authorizations,” meaning the drugs are technically still experimental. Full approval could take years, during which time hundreds of thousands of service members will apparently remain susceptible to, and potentially vectors of, Covid-19.
There’s good reason for this law. The government and military have nasty histories of experimenting on people, including service members, without their knowledge or consent. And in fact, the law has been put to the test.
In 1997, the military instituted a mandatory vaccination program for anthrax. Upon receiving that vaccine, huge numbers of service members complained of debilitating side effects. (The vaccine may also have been a factor in what’s known as “Gulf War syndrome,” a multi-symptom illness of unknown origin related to service in the 1991 war.) Lawsuits ensued, and in 2004 the D.C. Circuit court determined that the government had violated federal law by mandating the medicine, specifically because the vaccine in question was proven to prevent cutaneous anthrax infection, though the military sought to prevent against inhalation anthrax, the most deadly form of the disease and the one most likely to be associated with a bio-attack. But the FDA hadn’t adequately studied the vaccine’s use against inhalation anthrax, the court found, meaning it didn’t meet the standard for mandatory military distribution.
Following further testing, mandatory anthrax vaccinations resumed in 2007, with troops risking court-martial and even separation from the service if they refused the vaccine. (Fun fact: Jake Angeli, the Viking-helmeted “QAnon shaman” of Capitol riot infamy, was kicked out of the Navy in late 2007, after two years as an enlisted sailor, for this very reason, according to Task & Purpose.)
With the coronavirus vaccine, the Pentagon surely would want to avoid similar, protracted legal battles. Military leaders have expressed frustration at low vaccine acceptance rates—the AP reported they had hoped the military might serve as an example to the public. But the law is clear.
There are critical and obvious differences, though, between the anthrax case and America’s present predicament, which should cause the government to reconsider its approach.
First, during the last major anthrax scare in the United States, in 2001, the disease killed five people. Covid-19 has killed more than 500,000 Americans, with more deaths in January 2021 than during any previous month of the pandemic.
Second, anthrax is not contagious. Coronavirus, clearly, is. And new, even more infectious—and more virulent—variants are on the rise. That in mind, it’s worth noting the military is a highly mobile profession, and that service members aren’t self-contained on bases. Many live off-base and often, as a group, play significant roles in their respective communities. In other words, an unvaccinated troop poses a risk to more than only their fellow service members. It’s not clear if service members refusing the vaccine will participate in the military’s efforts to distribute the vaccine domestically, though that would be ironic. I asked the Pentagon about this. “That’s a good question,” a public affairs officer told me, though an emailed request for further comment went unanswered.
And third, many service members aren’t giving very good reasons for refusing the vaccine. With anthrax, there were serious questions about the vaccine’s efficacy and evidence of significant side-effects. By contrast, evidence from large vaccine trials and more than 24 million completed vaccinations in the United States so far show that the coronavirus vaccines are very safe (even if the second doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can pack a wallop). Fears about side effects from the coronavirus vaccine are only natural, and military leaders should address them compassionately. But some members refusing the vaccine are instead citing misinformation, such as that the vaccine is a tracking device (it isn’t); partisan objections, in the same way that some view masks as a political statement (they aren’t); and even the novelty of self-determination. “The Army tells me what, how, and when to do almost everything,” one soldier told The New York Times. “They finally asked me to do something and I actually have a choice, so I said no.”
In the seven years I spent in the US Navy, I was vaccinated for at least anthrax, smallpox, hepatitis A and B, typhoid, yellow fever, and, every year, the flu. When my unit was deployed to East Africa, under Special Operations Command, we were given pills to prevent against malaria. These were said, perhaps apocryphally, to cause bizarre dreams and mood swings, so most of us left the pills in the bottle. Then a few guys actually got malaria. The commanding general was furious. New guidance from my boss was: “It’s funny. If you get malaria, it’ll be the general who kills you.” We took the pills.
Now, commanders are jumping through hoops to push the coronavirus vaccine. They’re convening town halls, hosting question-and-answer information sessions, and posting photos and videos of themselves receiving shots. The message: Please, please follow our lead.
It’s an uncomfortable position for leaders, in an organization that hinges on an expectation of compliance. One commanding officer in the Washington, D.C., area told me that the optional vaccine has also opened a door to obvious partisanship and misinformation in the ranks. This officer has strenuously encouraged subordinates to receive the vaccine but is hamstrung by an influential member of the command who declined it because, this person said, “it feels partisan.” In any other circumstance, it would be incumbent on a leader to squash rhetoric like this, as a matter of what the military calls “good order and discipline.”
There are impacts on operations, too. If a member who refuses the vaccine winds up testing positive for the virus—not an unlikely scenario, with cases still high—that person is of course moved to quarantine. An unequal burden then falls on troops who did take the vaccine, who must flex to cover the infected member’s duties. Another officer relayed a story to me in which an unvaccinated sailor was due to be deployed but contracted the coronavirus and ultimately missed the unit’s departure.
Mandatory vaccination may not be the answer, but clearly something is broken here.
The law does provide one way around the informed-consent requirement for the military with experimental drugs: The president can waive that requirement, if it is deemed in the best interest of service members or national security to do so. I won’t presume to say President Biden should do this, but the question is worthy of consideration.More practically, and soon, the Defense Department should confer additional tools to military leaders to help compel vaccine acceptance. The military could introduce incentives for taking the vaccine, in the form of financial bonuses—like some US companies have done—or time off (the military loves time off). Or, without making the vaccine mandatory, commanders could be empowered to relegate subordinates who refuse the vaccine to a limited set of duties. Those troops could also be required to live on base, in barracks, until they receive the vaccine, or until the spread of the virus has declined significantly. (To readers not in the know: This is a near-nuclear suggestion; it would have the desired effect.) Importantly, the latter two proposals shouldn’t be viewed as reprisal. They’re commonsense measures, to the benefit of public health. And common sense, at least, should not be optional.
Andrew McCormickTWITTERAndrew McCormick is an independent journalist in Washington, D.C. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The Atlantic, Columbia Journalism Review, and the South China Morning Post, among other publications. He is a US Navy veteran.
TammyinWI
Talk is cheap
NATURE publishes insane rant by Texas pediatrician Peter Hotez, who seemingly calls for United Nations SHOCK TROOPS to wage “counteroffensive” against all anti-vaxxers – (opinion)
(Planet Today) A dean at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, is essentially calling for United Nations shock troops to hunt down and silence all anti-vaxxers as a way to stop what he calls “anti-vax aggression.”
Echoing the fascism of genocidal maniacs like Hitler and Stalin, Peter Hotez displays his own brand of insanity by equating vaccine skeptics with cyber criminals and nuclear terrorism, calling for an armed “counteroffensive” run by law enforcement to target and attack all who oppose vaccines, including vaccine-damaged whistleblowers, apparently.
Somehow, NATURE thinks this is a scientifically-worthy rant to publish, since NATURE is of course part of the very same vaccine mafia that’s currently targeting humanity for genocidal extermination.
Much like an increasing number of hostile doctors and medical researchers who have become dangerous vaccine zealots, Hotez has abandoned any remaining pretense of informed consent and now believes all of humanity should be forced at gunpoint to not merely take all government-mandated vaccines, but to be threatened into silence at gunpoint if they disagree with pro-vaccine propaganda.
He writes about all this in a seemingly deranged rant published by NATURE, which states:
Halting the spread of the coronavirus will require a high-level counteroffensive against new destructive forces.
Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber security, law enforcement, public education and international relations. A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures. The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires a counteroffensive.
Hotez apparently supports vaccine violence against children, then calls those who oppose him “aggressors”
In his bizarre rant, Hotez claims there are “targeted attacks on scientists” but doesn’t name a single scientist who has been physically attacked, harmed or killed by any so-called “anti-vaxxer.” To halt this fictitious “aggression,” he then calls for, quite literally, targeted (armed) attacks on anti-vaxxers, essentially explaining government forces must be weaponized and aggressively deployed against vaccine skeptics in order to stop “anti-vax aggression” by using a “counteroffensive” of law enforcement (who are obviously armed).
Meanwhile, the very thing he continues to push — unsafe, experimental vaccines — are inflicting medical violence against millions of innocent people around the world right now, spiking the VAERS-reported vaccine deaths by 16,000% in the first quarter of 2021 vs. the first quarter of 2020.
Vaccine violence against innocent men, women and children appears to be perfectly okay with Peter Hotez. It is the whistleblowers trying to stop all this vaccine violence who must be threatened at gunpoint and terminated from existence, he implies.
The real threat to humanity, says Hotez, is a vast “anti-vaccine empire,” which smacks of Hillary Clinton’s claim of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
And then, as you might suspect, he invokes “the Russians.”
Once again, it’s all “The Russians”
Hotez says “Russian intelligence organizations” are behind much of the vaccine “disinformation” that’s currently published on the ‘net. He then claims, without evidence, that such Russian disinformation campaigns are intended to “destabilize the United States.” Does he mean the same United States that’s being deliberately destabilized by Joe Biden’s lawless regime through wide open borders, mad money printing, rigged elections and tyrannical medicine?
Hotez claims anti-vaccine groups “target Black communities,” but deliberately lies and misleads NATURE readers, since the vaccine skeptics are actually warning Black Americans about Tuskegee-like medical experiments that have long been known to deliberately harm Blacks in the name of “scientific progress.” (Is Hotez a Tuskegee denier? A Holocaust denier?)
He laments the fact that “tens of thousands of vaccine doses are going unused” and claims anyone who expresses any concern over a covid vaccine — despite their shocking level of causing injuries and deaths — is falling prey to “exaggerated fears” and doesn’t want to be treated like guinea pigs, for some reason.
Worst of all, Hotez yells “fire!” in a crowded theater and uses the powerful platform of NATURE to call for governments to be weaponized against vaccine skeptics, merely because he himself believes that he is right and they are wrong. Rather than picking up an AR-15 himself and hunting down and trying to kill vaccine whistleblowers, he begs government to commit the violence for him.
Sounds like a coward, not a scientist.
In my podcast, I’m calling for readers and fans to pray for this sad monster of a man, to pray that he might set himself free from the evil demons who obviously possess his tired body, from what I can tell. Pray that he may return to God and seek forgiveness for the crimes against humanity being committed by whatever twisted, dark soul currently occupies his once-human body.
Here’s how to contact him using publicly-available contact information published on the Baylor website. I insist that if you choose to contact Hotez, be polite and do not engage in the kind of threats of violence that he levels against others. We do not have to stoop to such lows, as we have truth, justice and God on our side.
I’m also officially inviting Peter Hotez to an interview to allow him to answer questions, should he choose to do so. But I’m not holding my breath…
Peter Hotez:
Twitter: @PeterHotez
https://www.bcm.edu/people-search/peter-hotez-23229
Office phone: 713-798-1199
Email: [email protected]
Baylor College of Medicine (his employer):
Main number: (713) 798-4951
Be polite. No threats.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PlanetToday/comments/n60ski/nature_publishes_insane_rant_by_texas/
(Planet Today) A dean at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, is essentially calling for United Nations shock troops to hunt down and silence all anti-vaxxers as a way to stop what he calls “anti-vax aggression.”
Echoing the fascism of genocidal maniacs like Hitler and Stalin, Peter Hotez displays his own brand of insanity by equating vaccine skeptics with cyber criminals and nuclear terrorism, calling for an armed “counteroffensive” run by law enforcement to target and attack all who oppose vaccines, including vaccine-damaged whistleblowers, apparently.
Somehow, NATURE thinks this is a scientifically-worthy rant to publish, since NATURE is of course part of the very same vaccine mafia that’s currently targeting humanity for genocidal extermination.
Much like an increasing number of hostile doctors and medical researchers who have become dangerous vaccine zealots, Hotez has abandoned any remaining pretense of informed consent and now believes all of humanity should be forced at gunpoint to not merely take all government-mandated vaccines, but to be threatened into silence at gunpoint if they disagree with pro-vaccine propaganda.
He writes about all this in a seemingly deranged rant published by NATURE, which states:
Halting the spread of the coronavirus will require a high-level counteroffensive against new destructive forces.
Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber security, law enforcement, public education and international relations. A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures. The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires a counteroffensive.
Hotez apparently supports vaccine violence against children, then calls those who oppose him “aggressors”
In his bizarre rant, Hotez claims there are “targeted attacks on scientists” but doesn’t name a single scientist who has been physically attacked, harmed or killed by any so-called “anti-vaxxer.” To halt this fictitious “aggression,” he then calls for, quite literally, targeted (armed) attacks on anti-vaxxers, essentially explaining government forces must be weaponized and aggressively deployed against vaccine skeptics in order to stop “anti-vax aggression” by using a “counteroffensive” of law enforcement (who are obviously armed).
Meanwhile, the very thing he continues to push — unsafe, experimental vaccines — are inflicting medical violence against millions of innocent people around the world right now, spiking the VAERS-reported vaccine deaths by 16,000% in the first quarter of 2021 vs. the first quarter of 2020.
Vaccine violence against innocent men, women and children appears to be perfectly okay with Peter Hotez. It is the whistleblowers trying to stop all this vaccine violence who must be threatened at gunpoint and terminated from existence, he implies.
The real threat to humanity, says Hotez, is a vast “anti-vaccine empire,” which smacks of Hillary Clinton’s claim of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
And then, as you might suspect, he invokes “the Russians.”
Once again, it’s all “The Russians”
Hotez says “Russian intelligence organizations” are behind much of the vaccine “disinformation” that’s currently published on the ‘net. He then claims, without evidence, that such Russian disinformation campaigns are intended to “destabilize the United States.” Does he mean the same United States that’s being deliberately destabilized by Joe Biden’s lawless regime through wide open borders, mad money printing, rigged elections and tyrannical medicine?
Hotez claims anti-vaccine groups “target Black communities,” but deliberately lies and misleads NATURE readers, since the vaccine skeptics are actually warning Black Americans about Tuskegee-like medical experiments that have long been known to deliberately harm Blacks in the name of “scientific progress.” (Is Hotez a Tuskegee denier? A Holocaust denier?)
He laments the fact that “tens of thousands of vaccine doses are going unused” and claims anyone who expresses any concern over a covid vaccine — despite their shocking level of causing injuries and deaths — is falling prey to “exaggerated fears” and doesn’t want to be treated like guinea pigs, for some reason.
Worst of all, Hotez yells “fire!” in a crowded theater and uses the powerful platform of NATURE to call for governments to be weaponized against vaccine skeptics, merely because he himself believes that he is right and they are wrong. Rather than picking up an AR-15 himself and hunting down and trying to kill vaccine whistleblowers, he begs government to commit the violence for him.
Sounds like a coward, not a scientist.
In my podcast, I’m calling for readers and fans to pray for this sad monster of a man, to pray that he might set himself free from the evil demons who obviously possess his tired body, from what I can tell. Pray that he may return to God and seek forgiveness for the crimes against humanity being committed by whatever twisted, dark soul currently occupies his once-human body.
Here’s how to contact him using publicly-available contact information published on the Baylor website. I insist that if you choose to contact Hotez, be polite and do not engage in the kind of threats of violence that he levels against others. We do not have to stoop to such lows, as we have truth, justice and God on our side.
I’m also officially inviting Peter Hotez to an interview to allow him to answer questions, should he choose to do so. But I’m not holding my breath…
Peter Hotez:
Twitter: @PeterHotez
https://www.bcm.edu/people-search/peter-hotez-23229
Office phone: 713-798-1199
Email: [email protected]
Baylor College of Medicine (his employer):
Main number: (713) 798-4951
Be polite. No threats.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/PlanetToday/comments/n60ski/nature_publishes_insane_rant_by_texas/