ALERT Ted Cruz's claims about CNN are 'false' PLUS BOR interview

Be Well

may all be well
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/03/media/ted-cruz-ben-carson-cnn-controversy/index.html

Brian Stelter @brianstelter February 3, 2016: 7:39 PM ET

Ted Cruz, under fire for misinforming Iowa voters about the status of his rival Ben Carson's campaign, is wrongly claiming that it is CNN's fault.

In a strongly worded statement on Wednesday evening, CNN said, "Senator Cruz's claims about CNN are false. At no point did the network indicate Dr. Carson would suspend his campaign."

The controversy stems from a CNN scoop that was broadcast Monday night, minutes before the Iowa caucuses began. Reporter Chris Moody received information from the Carson campaign that he would be taking a break from the campaign trail after Iowa.

Moody, and the other CNN reporters who followed up on the report, said Carson would continue campaigning after taking a break at home in Florida. His next stop, they said, would be Washington, D.C., for the National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday.


During CNN's live coverage, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash called the move "very unusual," but said nothing about Carson dropping out of the race.


Somewhere along the way, the story got twisted. Cruz campaign aides alerted supporters in Iowa that Carson might be a goner. Before long there were allegations that the Cruz campaign had suppressed Carson's vote total by spreading rumors that Carson was giving up on the race.

Shortly after the CNN report came out, Carson's campaign downplayed the significance, saying the candidate needed a fresh set of clothes. Meanwhile, political analysts generally agreed with Tapper and Bash's assessment that it was unusual for a presidential candidate to not rush to New Hampshire. Virtually all of Carson's rivals hurried to New Hampshire after the caucuses.

The next morning, Carson's side started lambasting Cruz for "dirty tricks." This prompted a half-apology from Cruz that pointed a finger at CNN.

"Last night when our political team saw the CNN post saying Dr. Carson was not carrying on to New Hampshire and South Carolina, our campaign updated the grassroots leaders just as we would with any breaking news story. That's fair game," Cruz said in a statement. "What the team should have done is send around the follow-up statement from the Carson campaign clarifying that he was indeed staying in the race when that came out. That was a mistake from our end, and for that I apologize to Dr. Carson."

Essentially the Cruz campaign ignored the inconvenient part of CNN's original report — that Carson was not dropping out of the race.

In fact, Moody said so explicitly on Twitter: "He plans to stay in the race beyond Iowa no matter what the results are tonight."

So the misinformation began with a kernel of truth — that Carson was catching his breath after the caucuses — but was transformed into something untrue.

CNN's statement laid out the facts this way: "Our correspondent reported the information provided to him by the Carson campaign. Dr. Carson's staff informed CNN that he would return home to take a 'deep breath' before resuming his activities on the trail. That information was reported accurately by CNN across TV and digital."

By Wednesday morning, Donald Trump had weighed in, accusing Cruz of "fraud" in Iowa, partly for misinforming voters about Carson.

But Cruz stuck to his story, telling reporters, "Our political team passed on a CNN news story that CNN wrote. The news story said that Ben Carson was not continuing from Iowa on to New Hampshire. He was not continuing to South Carolina. Instead, he was going home to Florida. That was a news story CNN had posted, and our political team passed it on to our supporters. It was breaking news that was relevant."

Cruz claimed that the media "wants to stir up a fight between Ben Carson and me."

When CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin played that sound bite from Cruz, she followed up with a forceful rebuttal: "When Senator Cruz, with all due respect, tries to throw my network and CNN under the bus, let me stand up for my colleagues and journalists here... We reported it accurately."

"I'm going to call out B.S. if I hear B.S. And that was B.S.," Baldwin said.
 
Last edited:

Be Well

may all be well
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...z-camps-cheating-stole-iowa-from-trump-video/


BOOM! Karl Rove Breaks Down How Cruz Camp’s Cheating Stole Iowa from Trump (VIDEO)


Jim Hoft Feb 3rd, 2016 8:07 pm

carson-cruz-dirty-trick-575x334.jpg


On Monday Dr. Ben Carson accused the Cruz camp of foul play in the Iowa Caucuses.
Carson said the Cruz camp told voters Carson was dropping out and to support Ted Cruz.

Carson was right to be outraged…
The Cruz camp sent this message out at 7:01 PM before the voting started at the Iowa caucuses.

cruz-rumor-carson-575x565.jpg


On Wednesday, Karl Rove, not a Trump fan by any means, explained how the cheating could have cost Donald Trump the election in Iowa.

“The Cruz Campaign, Spence Rogers, sends out a tweet. And the tweet is headlined, “Press says that Carson is going to take a break” so tell all the Carson people to campaign with Cruz At 7:53 the Carson people send out a release saying, “We’re here. We’re staying in the race. We’re going to New Hampshire and South Carolina.” And at 8:20 the national co-chairman of the Cruz campaign, Steve King, sends out a tweet saying, “It looks like Carson is getting out of the race.” Now they knew at this point that this was inaccurate.

“Senator Cruz in his initial explanation about this said we were sending it to our team, leaving the implication, I suspect, to most viewers, that this had to do with sending it out to staff members. No, no, no They sent this to their nearly 1,500 precinct captains. There are 1,500 precincts in the state. And they sent this message from Spence Roberts (Rogers). Now why does that matter. Now the gap between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz is 6,239 votes. There are 1,500 precincts. Do the math… If that message cost Carson four votes per precinct to switch to Cruz, then Cruz beats Trump. If he doesn’t switch four, then he loses. “



Interview with BOR.
 

Be Well

may all be well
Timing and content of the tweets is everything.

1. Supposedly the initial Cruz campaign tweet came out at 7 pm. They claimed that CNN was saying that Carson was taking a break and would have a big announcement later in the week. This was untrue. CNN did not say Carson was taking a break, nor did they say there would be a big announcement.

2. Carson responded by 7:53 that no, he was staying in. They were going to S Carolina and NH.

3. At 8:20, the national co-chairman of the Cruz campaign, Steve King, tweeted out that it looks like Carson is getting out of the race. THis went out to ALL of the precinct captains. They knew at that point it was absolutely not true.

Cruz later tried to say the tweets just went out to "our team" ....where most people would think it was just staff, when instead it went to 15-1600 precinct captains.


6a0134873aa66a970c01b7c810efb4970b-500wi



More info on Gabriel:


Ex-CIA agent leads new team of journalists in Cuba

Gabriel helped pioneer the use of social media in war-fighting and political conflict, and he was an early advocate for incorporating social media metrics into predictive intelligence and risk analysis. He is a subject matter expert and original researcher of interactive digital media strategies, social network analysis, international media research, text analytics, latent semantic indexing, strategic planning techniques, operational and organizational design, and complex system dynamics.
 

Be Well

may all be well
I've never known any Cubans and I'm sure there are good ones, but Cruz is not one of the good ones.
 

Mixin

Veteran Member
Bill Mitchell noticed the strangeness of the votes and tweeted about it all night long. Here are some of them (newer ones at the top)

Bill Mitchell ‏@mitchellvii Feb 2
I think I know why Trump won the entrance polls but lost the caucus. People went to vote Trump but got guilted out of it by Cruz supporters.

The strangest thing for me was that for most of the night, Cruz maintained that same exact 3000 vote lead. Didn't grow, didn't shrink.

I have news for Ben Shapiro and other media idiots. Cruz won a crazy little state by 6000 votes. He is NOT the GOP front-runner.

Bill Mitchell ‏@mitchellvii Feb 2
Cruz built that 3000 for lead right at the beginning and held onto the exact same lead 70% of the way. Weird.

Trump even won the entry polls by a solid margin yet Cruz lead the vote from the outset.

EVERYONE said big crowds would benefit Trump - and yet, they benefited Cruz??? None of this makes sense.

So much of this makes no sense. Trump lead entry polls by 5, but then Cruz lead from the very start. How did entry polls get it so wrong?

Well, I guess DMR is no longer the gold standard in Iowa, lol. EVERYONE blew this one.

Rubio came in 9 points ahead of his polling. I find that very very very odd. MS, what are you up to here?

Literally every single presumption about tonight was WRONG. Amazing.

What shocks me is that Cruz won when he split the Evangelical Votes with Trump and Rubio.

Cruz took that 3500 lead early and just held it all night.

Simply shocked that with record turnout and record new registrations, Cruz won. That defied ALL EXPECTATIONS.

Something is just odd about this.

What I don't comprehend is that Cruz is NOT dominating with Evangelicals and yet he is winning. So so so strange.

Cruz has had the same 3500 vote lead for an hour. Bizarre.

Rubio is 8 points above the DMR poll. That's just nuts.

How the hell does Cruz just maintain that same damned 3500 vote lead?

It's like Cruz built that 3500 vote lead early and it just stuck. So strange.

Here's the weird thing. All these votes coming in and Cruz just keeps that 3500 lead. Bizarre.

Marco Rubio at 22% is purely shocking.

Trump is dominating heavily evangelical areas won by Santorum. Who the hell would have picked that?

Trump is winning all of the rural areas and ted cruz is winning the cities. It makes NO sense.

How the hell is Trump doing poorly is Des Moines? That is nuts.

Early entrance numbers surprisingly high for Rubio. Later voters will go Trump since they were registering.

27% Trump
22% Cruz
21% Rubio
Very early entrance interviews.

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii
 
How many 'typical' Cubans do you know?


I can't speak for Packyderms_wife, but I taught high school in FL for many years and know quite a few Cubans. Most are nice people, but they all share that same trait ... that the end justifies the means, which fits in with PW's statement.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
I knew quite a few Cubans while I was in Miami.

Most were decent on a personal level, but as a whole, they are my least favorite of the Caribbean latin types.

Its hard to explain, they kinda remind me of the fast talking Jersey hustler types, but a Spanish speaking version.
 

Josie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Microsoft app for counting/recording or sending the caucus votes?

And this is why I find myself agreeing with Sanders!! :sht: I want a hard count of the votes. I would be highly interested in knowing how the actual numbers stack up against the Microsoft tally.
 

thompson

Certa Bonum Certamen
And this is why I find myself agreeing with Sanders!! :sht: I want a hard count of the votes. I would be highly interested in knowing how the actual numbers stack up against the Microsoft tally.

Yes, same here.
 
Top