SCI Sperm counts are on the decline – could plastics be to blame? [dogs and humans]

Melodi

Disaster Cat
This is The UK Guardian which has a rather left-leaning stance but this looks like a real science article and posting it for the sake of interest and conversation - the topic of low sperm counts is a real thing, I "love" how they have to throw "climate change in at the end there even though it has little or nothing to do with the topic

Toxic America

Sperm counts are on the decline – could plastics be to blame?


Research suggests that sperm counts have dropped by half in the last 50 years or so and that a higher percentage are poor swimmers.

A recent study that tested both men and dogs added to concerns that chemicals in the environment are damaging the quality and quantity of sperm



by Teresa Carr

Fri 24 May 2019 07.00 BST

Surprising new research into dog sperm has reproductive biologists concerned about the fate of their own species. In a March study, scientists at Nottingham University found that two chemicals common in home environments damage the quality of sperm in both men and dogs.

The culprits implicated are diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), used to make new plastics more pliable, and polychlorinated biphenyl 153 (PCB153), found in older plastics and electrical equipment. Companies stopped producing PCBs in the late 1970s due to their health risks – including a possible increased risk of cancer, hormone disruption, liver damage and behavioral or cognitive deficits in children exposed to the chemical in utero – but the chemical persists in the environment.


The Nottingham study is just one in a mounting pile of research indicating that the quality and quantity of men’s sperm is on the decline. Research suggests that sperm counts have dropped by half in the last 50 years or so and that a higher percentage are poor swimmers – slow, ungainly or beset by genetic flaws.

The exact cause of that decline is not well understood. One culprit may be increasingly unhealthy lifestyles. The same factors that affect general health – being overweight or obese, smoking, stress and alcohol or recreational drug use – also affect the quality of sperm. But many researchers suspect chemical residues in the environment may be partly to blame.

To test that theory, the Nottingham researchers first removed contaminants from semen samples of men and dogs then exposed the manmade chemicals. Results showed that exposure to chemicals at levels found in the environment reduced sperm motility (ability to swim) and fragmented DNA carried in the head of the sperm.

The number of semen samples in the Scientific Reports study – nine from men and 11 from dogs – is too small to draw conclusions about cause and effect, says the lead author Richard G Lea, an associate professor of reproductive biology at the University of Nottingham’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Science. “Of course we have to be cautious based on these numbers,” he says. “But our data add to the weight of evidence that chemicals in the home environment degrade sperm.”

If the cause is environmental, you would expect to see a similar effect on man’s best friend, says Lea. “Dogs live in our homes. They often even accompany us to work,” he says. “They share our environment basically so they’re exposed the same chemical contaminants.”

And, indeed, in a 2016 study of sperm collected from stud dogs, Lea’s team discovered that the number of good swimmers decreased by 30% over a 26-year period.

An indicator that something is very wrong
Declining sperm counts are an “indicator that there is something very wrong in our modern environment or lifestyle”, says Dr Hagai Levine, head of the environmental health track at the Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health in Israel. “We need to identify what the causes are and fix them. Otherwise it’s dangerous to our future and maybe irreversible.”

Part of the problem is most certainly the way we work and live. Being stressed out and sedentary is no good for sperm and it’s even worse if you smoke, drink alcohol or use recreational drugs. For example, a large review of studies from 26 regions across the world found that smoking decreased sperm by 13-17%. Another study found that smoking marijuana regularly (more than once weekly) lowers sperm count in young men and that the effect is exacerbated when they also use other recreational drugs.

There’s also a growing consensus that some chemicals found in everyday products such as plastic bottles, metal food cans, detergents, flame retardants, food, toys, cosmetics and pesticides can affect a man’s reproductive health. Those chemicals, referred to as “endocrine disruptors” interfere with the body’s natural hormone systems – by blocking production or effects of the male hormone testosterone, for instance.

Those effects may begin while babies are still developing in their mother’s womb says Niels Skakkebæk, professor at the University of Copenhagen and senior researcher at the department of growth and reproduction at Rigshospitalet in Denmark. He points out that poor sperm quality is associated with an increased risk of testicular cancer and also a history of congenital reproductive defects, including undescended testes. One theory is that all those conditions are linked to the mother’s exposure to environmental contaminants at critical moments during pregnancy when the baby’s sex organs develop.

Endocrine disruptors may also affect sperm in adult men.
A 2014 study of the effects of 96 of those chemicals on human sperm found that they affected sperm’s ability to swim, navigate and fertilize an egg.

Chemicals from plastics are particularly worrisome because they are so ubiquitous.

Roughly two-thirds of the plastic ever produced has been released into the environment and shows up as tiny particles in the air, water and soil. Eventually those plastics collect in the tissues and fluids in our bodies. Lea says he focused on two compounds that “consistently popped up” in his analysis of dog food, sperm and testes tissues from routine neutering procedures. But there are many others he’d like to study.

“The reality is I’ve only looked at two chemicals, but we live in a cocktail of pollutants,” he says.

Last year, Levine and other scientists, public health officials and clinicians from around the world issued a statement calling on governments, the scientific and medical communities, and organizations to acknowledge the importance of male reproductive health, to allocate resources to study the issues and to implement policies that remove hazards and promote a safer environment. The plea did not draw as much attention to the problem of declining sperm counts as he had hoped.

Approaching a tipping point?

The most obvious concern of dropping sperm counts is infertility. Even with sperm counts in decline, most men retain their fertility potential, says Skakkebæk. But birth rates have been declining in industrialized countries for decades, he says, and it’s not clear that’s entirely by choice.

Recent studies suggest that 20-30% of young men today have sperm counts in a range that is associated with reduced fertility, says Skakkebæk.

Some research suggests we may be reaching “a tipping point” where more couples will take longer to conceive or may need the help of assisted reproductive technology such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), he says. He points out that in Denmark, the number of couples seeking help for infertility has increased significantly since 2001. “Almost 10% of children are now born after assisted reproduction,” he says

Current estimates are that 12-18% of couples have problems conceiving, but there isn’t good data to show how that is changing over time. Most researchers view the declining population data in western countries as a worrisome trend, but there is nothing to link that specifically to sperm decline.

There’s also a worry that decreasing quantity and quality of sperm is a marker for worsening health in general says Levine. Research has linked problems with sperm to a higher risk of a number of serious health conditions, including cancer, diabetes and heart disease, as well as death.

[And here it comes, the Party Message of the Day - Melodi]


I do see an analogy to climate change in the sense that we have clear scientific signs of the problem – a very serious problem, which endangers humanity,” he says. “But we are not taking the needed steps to reverse it or even just to start to understand what is going on.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/24/toxic-america-sperm-counts-plastics-research
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Yeah, the last part makes me question the author's judgement on his own data. Is 10% assisted reproduction all that out of the ordinary from an historical perspective?

One thing that did stand out, was that the comparisons were reportedly made from sperm studies 30 years ago, and 2001. IMO, we were already in trouble 30 years ago. I'm fifty years old. I've noticed my whole adult life that men my age and younger are less masculine (less tall, less sturdy, and different in personality) than men from ten years older on up.

I remember an outdated theory told to me as a child, that Rome collapsed due to lead in the pipes. Wonder if future researchers will determine that the West collapsed due to plastics.
 

Stanb999

Inactive
Fatter and bigger men.... Testicles are the same size.

The real issue is pushing adolescence well into adulthood and young adulthood into middle age.

Fact is the human animal has no business having a child at 35... There was a reason wealth was left to the eldest and it was because they were first. It was because as time went on they got "off".
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
Plastics...sure, maybe, but I'd lean to simply stress, lack of exercise & sunlight, and horrible diets. Those could also cover the modern dog's lifestyle.

Didn't see that the author mentioned the endemic nature of female hormones in drinking water supplies excreted from HRT & birth control. Also would be a common denominator in domestic dogs, who drink water from our municipal supplies.
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Plastics...sure, maybe, but I'd lean to simply stress, lack of exercise & sunlight, and horrible diets. Those could also cover the modern dog's lifestyle.

Didn't see that the author mentioned the endemic nature of female hormones in drinking water supplies excreted from HRT & birth control. Also would be a common denominator in domestic dogs, who drink water from our municipal supplies.

Just from casual observation, I'd say residues in municipal water supplies might be the big problem. I've posted this before, but when ranch families come to the feed store, the boys are BOYS, and their younger fathers look like men. Ranches use well water. The kids at the HS in town, are almost a different species.
 

ambereyes

Veteran Member
Endocrine disrupters are a huge problem in many areas of human health. I wish there was a more in depth study on the amounts involved and cumulative effects. As to the climate change add on, it IMHO taints the research.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Just from casual observation, I'd say residues in municipal water supplies might be the big problem. I've posted this before, but when ranch families come to the feed store, the boys are BOYS, and their younger fathers look like men. Ranches use well water. The kids at the HS in town, are almost a different species.

A large number of municipalities in this country use well water, particularly between Appalachia and the Rockies. Somebody ought to run a sperm study on them vs cities that draw from rivers. They might find something.
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Off topic, but Climate Change is getting shoe-horned into everything right now. I was watching a falconry video last night, and I wanted to post it here - it was about eagle hunters in Mongolia, and the 20 min piece had everything: majestic birds, gorgeous open windswept landscapes, traditional peoples... but. ugh. Too much preaching at the end.
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
Just from casual observation, I'd say residues in municipal water supplies might be the big problem. I've posted this before, but when ranch families come to the feed store, the boys are BOYS, and their younger fathers look like men. Ranches use well water. The kids at the HS in town, are almost a different species.

Yup. I see it too. But there are so many factors besides water to consider with country kids. Difference in stress level, activity level, outdoor lifestyle, probably even diet.

It would certainly make a good study.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Off topic, but Climate Change is getting shoe-horned into everything right now. I was watching a falconry video last night, and I wanted to post it here - it was about eagle hunters in Mongolia, and the 20 min piece had everything: majestic birds, gorgeous open windswept landscapes, traditional peoples... but. ugh. Too much preaching at the end.

Most of the UK papers do this, it is like they are "under orders" (and they probably are that is legal in the UK) to always mention Climate Change in any remotely scientific article on just about anything - Super Nova's say Climate Change, Ancient jewelry horde found in Essex - be sure to add Climate Change at the bottom, etc.

The trick is, if it is at the END Of the article stuck on like a limpet then it probably has nothing to do with the main story or possibly even the views of the individual reporter; it just "has" to be there and sometimes that gets comical.
 

marymonde

Veteran Member
This documentary was produced by the Canadian Broadcast Company. It’s been taken down almost everywhere on the net.


http://vimeo.com/190834543

The Disappearing Male is a documentary about one of the most important and least publicized issues facing the human species: the toxic threat to the male reproductive system. The last few decades have seen steady and dramatic increases in the incidence of boys and young men suffering from genital deformities, low sperm count, sperm abnormalities and testicular cancer.

At the same time, boys are now far more at risk of suffering from ADHD, autism, Tourette's syndrome, cerebral palsy, and dyslexia. The Disappearing Male takes a close and disturbing look at what many doctors and researchers now suspect are responsible for many of these problems: a class of common chemicals that are ubiquitous in our world. Found in everything from shampoo, sunglasses, meat and dairy products, carpet, cosmetics and baby bottles, they are called "hormone mimicking" or "endocrine disrupting" chemicals and they may be starting to damage the most basic building blocks of human development.
A laundry list of articles relating to BPA;
naturalnews.com/list_features_BPA.html
 

Terriannie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Before Climate Change was the buzz word, a few years ago I heard the problem could have come from all the Birth Control ingredients excreted from urine, seeping into the water table. This has been going on for years and years, so, along with plastics and other contaminants, it's no surprise to me that not only did it affect men's sperm count but it also seems to have affected girls starting their periods earlier and earlier.
 

marymonde

Veteran Member
Plastics...sure, maybe, but I'd lean to simply stress, lack of exercise & sunlight, and horrible diets. Those could also cover the modern dog's lifestyle.

Didn't see that the author mentioned the endemic nature of female hormones in drinking water supplies excreted from HRT & birth control. Also would be a common denominator in domestic dogs, who drink water from our municipal supplies.

I think birth control and phytoestrogens are a big part of it, as well. Then add all the other thousands of possible endocrine disrupters in everything we eat and buy. Also, vaccines have human fragmented DNA from aborted babies. Early studies are linking it to chimerism causing transgendered tendencies in children. Here’s a recent Italian study on what one study found in the MMRV vaccine. DNA is suppose to be fragmented because whole genome is highly tumourgenic. If they found excessive male DNA, which is MRC-5, I’m sure they will find intact female DNA, which is WI-38, in other studies. There are no studies on fertility using human DNA in vaccines. This stuff is scary.

https://www.corvelva.it/en/speciale...UxiLl8cwmJeFBSKy7cg2bvS7W8ArkI6EDyiy0T7DDGA8Q

The amount of DNA: The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed in large quantities: 1.7 μg on the first lot and 3.7 μg on the second lot, about 325 times higher than the maximum limit of 10 nanograms and as many as 325,000 times higher than the minimum limit of 10 picograms, limits that EMA told us to refer only to cells that are known for carcinogenic activity. 6-7 


DNA size: We have more precisely determined the size of the DNA fragments detected and it has been established that the DNA contained has a molecular weight of 20,000/60,000 bp. This basically means that there are no "fragments" of DNA within this drug, i.e. degraded, but an intact genome, belonging to a male human being,confirmed by the comparison between the fetal DNA of the vaccine
and that of the cell line MRC-5 used for the production of the vaccine.


Non-detection of rubella virus: with the level of sequencing used for screening, it was not possible to detect rubella virus. Since there was doubt that this was an error in the procedure used, the level of sequencing was increased significantly to a very high depth (260 million sequences produced). ln this way the rubella virus was detected in 114 copies, equal to 0.00004% of the total of the sequences and through a manual reading of the sequences it was possible to eliminate any source of error of the software used and confirm definitively the (minimum) presence of rubella in the sample. However, this procedure has also made it possible to identify the adventitious viruses present in low copy numbers, and what has been seen is that the number of copies of the adventitious viruses exceeds that of rubella virus.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Before Climate Change was the buzz word, a few years ago I heard the problem could have come from all the Birth Control ingredients excreted from urine, seeping into the water table. This has been going on for years and years, so, along with plastics and other contaminants, it's no surprise to me that not only did it affect men's sperm count but it also seems to have affected girls starting their periods earlier and earlier.

Personally, I think there are a number of factors that contribute to modern infertility but I do think that plastics are an issue; so are hormones in the water supply and general public health.
 

dstraito

TB Fanatic
Whatever the reason, quality of the sperm or for behavioral reasons, the low reproductive rate will be the main reason for the fall of the United States. Assuming we make it that long against all our enemies, domestic and foreign
 

moldy

Veteran Member
Some food preservatives (BHA and BHT) are endocrine disruptors as well, and are in damn near everything.
 

Terriannie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Whatever the reason, quality of the sperm or for behavioral reasons, the low reproductive rate will be the main reason for the fall of the United States. Assuming we make it that long against all our enemies, domestic and foreign

Agreed and this all might be part of the objective. Between abortions and low birth rates, any war would mean our complete downfall, thus assuring the Guidestone builders and planners will get their wish.
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Yeah, the last part makes me question the author's judgement on his own data. Is 10% assisted reproduction all that out of the ordinary from an historical perspective?

That's one of those easily skewed stats. Historical there was little to do for the condition. You just didn't have kids.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
This documentary was produced by the Canadian Broadcast Company. It’s been taken down almost everywhere on the net.


http://vimeo.com/190834543

The Disappearing Male is a documentary about one of the most important and least publicized issues facing the human species: the toxic threat to the male reproductive system. The last few decades have seen steady and dramatic increases in the incidence of boys and young men suffering from genital deformities, low sperm count, sperm abnormalities and testicular cancer.

At the same time, boys are now far more at risk of suffering from ADHD, autism, Tourette's syndrome, cerebral palsy, and dyslexia. The Disappearing Male takes a close and disturbing look at what many doctors and researchers now suspect are responsible for many of these problems: a class of common chemicals that are ubiquitous in our world. Found in everything from shampoo, sunglasses, meat and dairy products, carpet, cosmetics and baby bottles, they are called "hormone mimicking" or "endocrine disrupting" chemicals and they may be starting to damage the most basic building blocks of human development.
A laundry list of articles relating to BPA;
naturalnews.com/list_features_BPA.html


I worked on a couple of white papers about the growing trend of the micropenis in the west. It's not just caucasians but also an issue with the negroid races as well, where little boys are being born, and growing up to be men with a erect penis lenght of less than three inches, the average erect size is something like two and a quarter inches. This is with both fat and skinny adult males. And the question is what the hell is causing this to happen, cause this is definitely going to affect birth rates.

Remember that a young woman today was an egg in her grandmother's womb when said grandmother was pregnant with her daughter. A baby girl is born with all the eggs she will ever need in her lifetime.

So what happened to women born in the 70's and 80's, their mothers would have been born in the 50's and very early 60's. What were those mothers exposed to to cause this to happen down the road?

I know my mom was given some drug when she was pregnant with me to prevent morning sickness. I like many women born in the mid-sixties was unable to carry a viable birth, many of my friends have developed breast and ovarian cancers that are directly linked to that drug. Many women born in the 60's, 70's, and especially the 80's and 90's have PCOD (polycystic ovarian disease), and the rate of autism skyrocketed.

All of this is connected. How, and why? I know some blame vaccines, but that is only part of the problem, female hormones (the pill & HRT) is part of the problem, plastics, food choices. Could it be due to all of that margarine we ate/were fed?
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
There are no studies on fertility using human DNA in vaccines. This stuff is scary.

That's interesting, and it would be an interesting study to do, however, it would take decades to do so not making the study cost-effective. Which therein lies the problem... everything is about money.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
That's one of those easily skewed stats. Historical there was little to do for the condition. You just didn't have kids.

Or if he was the infertile partner she might have jumped the fence as it were, with or without his consent in order to produce children.
 

marymonde

Veteran Member
I worked on a couple of white papers about the growing trend of the micropenis in the west. It's not just caucasians but also an issue with the negroid races as well, where little boys are being born, and growing up to be men with a erect penis lenght of less than three inches, the average erect size is something like two and a quarter inches. This is with both fat and skinny adult males. And the question is what the hell is causing this to happen, cause this is definitely going to affect birth rates.

Remember that a young woman today was an egg in her grandmother's womb when said grandmother was pregnant with her daughter. A baby girl is born with all the eggs she will ever need in her lifetime.

So what happened to women born in the 70's and 80's, their mothers would have been born in the 50's and very early 60's. What were those mothers exposed to to cause this to happen down the road?

I know my mom was given some drug when she was pregnant with me to prevent morning sickness. I like many women born in the mid-sixties was unable to carry a viable birth, many of my friends have developed breast and ovarian cancers that are directly linked to that drug. Many women born in the 60's, 70's, and especially the 80's and 90's have PCOD (polycystic ovarian disease), and the rate of autism skyrocketed.

All of this is connected. How, and why? I know some blame vaccines, but that is only part of the problem, female hormones (the pill & HRT) is part of the problem, plastics, food choices. Could it be due to all of that margarine we ate/were fed?

That’s very interesting. I’m so sorry what you had to go through. That’s so difficult to bear.

While I do believe vaccines cause many problems, I by all means don’t believe they’re solely responsible for everything. I almost think they know what combo of one thing, say a vaccine, works with fluoridated water, in creating health problems. Or that certain races are more susceptible to say, lead in water combined with GMOs in foods that will create disease. I truly believe they are withholding information. All in all, it has to be about depopulation.
 

marymonde

Veteran Member
That's interesting, and it would be an interesting study to do, however, it would take decades to do so not making the study cost-effective. Which therein lies the problem... everything is about money.


I’m just listening to a video about this very subject. It’s mind boggling how pharma gets a pass.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Just from casual observation, I'd say residues in municipal water supplies might be the big problem. I've posted this before, but when ranch families come to the feed store, the boys are BOYS, and their younger fathers look like men. Ranches use well water. The kids at the HS in town, are almost a different species.

Watcha wanna bet them country boys got Daddys.

Watcha wanna bet a ghastly % of them city boys don't.
 
Top