CORONA So...now that ALL of us are "vaxxed"--what can be done?

Theophilus

Theophilus
Shedding is for real. DW and I stayed away from crowds [generally]. But in late summer 2021, a nurse dropped by to see our house, she was building almost the same layout and wanted to see how ours was finished. Fine. Come on in. She was bombastic, loud, cough, sneezed and then explained she had just received her umpteenth booster.

I suspected the worst....and sure enough in three days, DW and I had a brimming hot case of Covid. Fortunately, in that short period of time, Florida was giving the Monoclonal (sp) treatments which we received. After about18 days we were back to normal, more or less.

Shedding for sure.
 

coalcracker

Veteran Member
Consider the spiritual truths:

“And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.” - Jesus Christ


Spoiler alert: Evil does not win.

“No weapon that is formed against you will succeed; And you will condemn every tongue that accuses you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, And their vindication is from Me,” declares the LORD.

For now, let’s pray against it.
 

Kewpie

Senior Member
Before the panic sets in, you need to read the study itself, not someone’s interpretation of it.

A. This has not been peer reviewed. You’d be surprised how many studies fall apart in that process.
B. The study states “The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included”, so if you’re relying on the study as accurate, also take that into account. The #1 contributor to cardiovascular issues, whether it’s a Covid infection, vaccine, has always been comorbidities. If you’re *THAT* concerned, go see a cardiologist! Get your calcium score! Get a sonogram on your veins to check blood flow! You can be proactive.
C. The mechanism of testing was to test masks worn by the vaccinated and control groups, and then nasal swab children to test their antibodies. The observation was that children within the vaccinated household held “readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in non-vaccinated households.” There’s a lot of wiggle room in that wording, and I didn’t see how verification for how they controlled the parameters for what the children were exposed to outside the home. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to dig into the specifics of how they conducted the study, but maybe I can later this evening or tomorrow.
D. Within the study itself, the authors state this is a hypothesis only. They also did not titer the children, so while they may have found antibodies within the nose, it doesn’t appear they tested to see if the antibodies made it into their bloodstream. Their words “Our results suggest that aerosol transmission of antibodies may also contribute to host protection and represent an entirely unrecognized mechanism by which passive immune protection may be communicated. Whether antibody transfer mediates host protection will be a function of exposure, but it seems reasonable to suggest, all things being equal, that any amount of antibody transfer would prove useful to the recipient host”. <—So take a breath! Shingles also sheds chicken pox virus, but it doesn’t mean it everyone you come in contact with gets it. This is currently in a hypothesis state, and sounds like they need a larger study and further testing to actually *CONFIRM* this hypothesis.

Honestly, your best bet would be to check titers with your doctor. Even if you were exposed to someone within the 48 hour period (I only saw that number within a news article though, I didn’t see it stated on the study itself), it doesn’t mean you were exposed to, or inhaled IgG or IgA. So BREATHE. This isn’t a cause for you to panic just yet.
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
So this thread's purpose is--as we all did early-on when Covid first hit--to ASK those who may know, either from personal study, or from personal expertise (such as Summerthyme's herbal/medical knowledge) - if there is ANYTHING known that can "reverse" this monstrosity that China, Fauci, and TPTB who (as Dennis has often said, literally want us ALL to die) have forced on us?

Only one thing is fully effective:

https://www.timebomb2000.com/xf/ind...depopulation-and-control.620706/#post-9195418
 

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!
A. This has not been peer reviewed. You’d be surprised how many studies fall apart in that process.
Peer Review is almost meaningless IMHO, it always seems to be nothing more than "group think" and anything controversial, that rocks the boat, gets tossed out. This is where "The Science Is Settled" comes from, science is never settled and it never will be nor should it. Relying on Peer Review only really limits new discovery.

Just my opinion, YMMV.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
We have long discussed shedding the spike, and this seems virtually a given. We can expect some deleterious effect from this, but it does not turn your body into a spike-generating factory. In spike-shedding you're picking up some low-level debris of another's injection, but you're not picking up the payload mRNA.

Shedding antibodies seems relatively benign to me, and we must be doing this all the time with all infections. The article proposes no reason to think the WuFlu antibodies are different from any other infection in this regard. So antibody shedding is a normal part of both infections and immunity traveling through a population, and has been for millions of years. Not gonna worry.

The article says it's worth studying whether the mRNA itself can shed, and apparently draws no conclusion about that. This is the piece that would be concerning, and it is merely suggested it should be explored. Certainly not hair-on-fire territory.

For those who think hypothetical mRNA shedding is all part of the plan, I disagree. The mRNA was said to remain at the injection site, and I suspect this is what the developers thought actually would happen. All the evidence points to slap-dash 'research' aimed at a selected goal, and jabs were the delivery system. If mRNA shedding were intended to accomplish what jabs do, there would be little need to endlessly push the jabs.

mRNA shedding was not included in clinical trials because it was not an intended effect, and its appearance in the wild is a novel question to the developers as it is to us. But at this point it seems to be merely a question, not an actual hazard.
Thanks for that reminder, bw. That is a comfort--but, a question.

IS it 'only' the spikes that shed?

Not the genetic material that can alter our cells? (which is the main reason I refused the vaccines--THAT was the primary danger, from my analysis)
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Shedding may be real and transmission may indeed occur within 48 hours of vaccination as the report suggests. That said, there are way to many "ifs" "coulds" and "there is a possibility" in this report for it to be taken as anything more than speculation. More research is needed.
I seem to understand from reading the article that they were surprised to find evidence of the shedding ON THE MASKS they made everyone wear...as well as in the bloodstreams of unvaxed people.

So it seems the masks served at least ONE useful purpose.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Actually I don’t; there’s been so much information in the last three years I lost track. But I believe you!
the warnings about pregnant women are mentioned several times in the link posted in Post 1--in this original article that talks about the 'discovery' by Pfizer that unvaxxed are picking up "shedded" materials from vaxed
 

Kewpie

Senior Member
Peer Review is almost meaningless IMHO, it always seems to be nothing more than "group think" and anything controversial, that rocks the boat, gets tossed out. This is where "The Science Is Settled" comes from, science is never settled and it never will be nor should it. Relying on Peer Review only really limits new discovery.

Just my opinion, YMMV.
Well, it does in fact benefit to have other people review your methodology and to recreate the study to recreate results. I think doing something once on a small scale and declaring it irrefutable fact, just because it confirms a bias…is a bit silly and misguided. But I also prefer to read studies in depth and form my own conclusions.

I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but research is one of my favorite ways of relaxing.

BUT, I suppose it’s more productive to panic and assume everyone is a mudblood and the whole human race is now going to die out, not just those darned ol mutated vaxxed folks, like everyone was hoping.

SHOOT.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Peer review in today's 'woke' / politically correct environment is meaningless.

They approved this vaccine with 'peer-reviewed' studies---but NO longitudinal studies (the standard for decades in the medical research field for new medicines / vaccines).

They IGNORED well-researched scientific evidence presented by researchers (all documented on the COVID thread) of the harm the vax was doing to human blood cells, the circulatory system, and the immune system.

I classify modern 'peer-reviewed' with the 'scientists' of Galileo's time who forced him to recant his support for Copernicus' heliocentric theory (and the evidence for it which Galileo had himself seen through his telescope) in order to hold on to their Aristotelian theory of a geo-centric solar system, due to a mistaken interpretation of the Bible.

So most modern "scientists"--who START NOT from a 'let's look at the evidence and THEN form our opinion/ belief based on that" viewpoint, but rather from their personal BELIEF (faith, if you will) system that "We KNOW this is true; let's find the evidence that backs it up." They absolutely reject and don't even consider any evidence that doesn't square with what they already BELIEVE.
 

Nigglety

Contributing Member
A study out of India got good results from coupling NAC with bromelein. The combo seems to unwind the spike proteins thereby inhibiting their generation.

I had covid in 19 with recurring issues. Much better since starting this protocol even using non therapeutic ie over the counter NAC and bromelein not IV.
 

pinkelsteinsmom

Veteran Member
Crimes against humanity .... we need trials and executions upon a finding of guilt.

COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA technology like Pfizer and Moderna were authorized globally without studies into the possible expression of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) containing the mRNA or of the spike protein manufactured by the cells of a recently vaccinated individual.
No, trials take to long and they own the courts, time for rightous hanging of all involved by the survivors. THIS IS WAR!
 

pinkelsteinsmom

Veteran Member
Got news for you, they've put ito everything but these first:

Subject: Discovery of self assembly of micro chip like structures found in Dental Anesthetics.

Darkfield Microscopy Of Dental Anesthetics
by Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

Dr. Jim Lundstrom, Integrity Liaison for the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, which represents 1520 Dentists and combined over 1 Million patients, sent me dental anesthetics to evaluate. He kindly allowed for me to post the findings. I will do much more investigation, since I received a lot of vials, but here are my preliminary observations.

The rest of this story:
Link Darkfield Microscopy Of Dental Anesthetics

Also in insulin

to include rabies, tetnus and most veterinary vaccines as well as flu shots.
 

Firebird

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I can tell you from firsthand experience that SOMETHING has definitely changed.

Hubs had a blood transfusion during hip replacement December 2021, and his overall health has been horrendous ever since (and we have the before/after bloodwork to prove it). I have wondered many times if the blood donor was vaxed.

We don't know the half of it yet.

It feels like the freaking Walking Dead. "We're all infected."
By brother in law received 5 units of blood during a hip replacement, we are very concerned for him :(
 

et2

TB Fanatic
So since it was brought up in a post here, some suggest that this might have been the acceptance of the mark. Is that correct? How can that be? It doesn’t follow the what the Bible teaches. Having to do with buying or selling.

Not wanting to turn this into a religious thread. But the jab doesn’t fit the criteria … or does it? And based on the discussion of shedding … it surely doesn’t fit it. One has to knowingly understand what they’re accepting? Right?
 

TFergeson

Non Solum Simul Stare
The thing is, the unvaccinated are not producing the spike proteins, we are just exposed to them. They dont "vax" us in the way those that took the vax are "vaxxed". Their bodies are constantly producing spike proteins, indefinitely, while our bodies only deal with the spike proteins when exposed, and our bodies eliminate them. This means we do not suffer the same types and levels of damage from the protein.

This is the new normal for us unvaccinated, at least for another year or two until most of the vax die off.

As for what we (unvaccinated) can do? I follow the FLCC protocols for exposure. NAC, Nattikionase, Chaga mushroom, vitamin D, diet, and exercise are my go tos.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Thanks for that reminder, bw. That is a comfort--but, a question.

IS it 'only' the spikes that shed?

Not the genetic material that can alter our cells? (which is the main reason I refused the vaccines--THAT was the primary danger, from my analysis)
The OP turns on exactly that question. There is no evidence the RNA sheds, there is only evidence the spike sheds. The OP is asking whether we should even TEST TO SEE if the RNA sheds, it doesn't assert that it does.

A lot of people here seem to think all shedding is the same.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
For now, the best thing people can do is just the everyday things that help them stay healthy. Most of Cliff's stuff isn't harmful (well, no mushrooms for me, I'm allergic), but other than personal issues, it doesn't hurt most people to take some Vitamin C or D.

Like many people here already do, limit processed foods as you can and cook from scratch as much as possible. Light to moderate exercise like walking or gardening for those able to do so, eat organic or homegrown/local farmer fruit and veg (when you can). You know, that kind of stuff.

Then treat things as they come along, using a combination of herbs and pharmaceuticals as the situation warrants. One thing that was suspicious from almost the start of the COVID narrative was the lack of the usual treatments usually given when people have congested lungs or trouble breathing. People were told to go home and visit the hospital if they got sick enough. That happened a lot in the US.

How serious this may be for non-vaccinated people remains to be seen. If it only creates antibodies it might not be so bad, but if it also messes up the RNA/DNA in the body, then it is a larger problem. The summary articles I have read so far is the response is weaker in people exposed to being around someone who has been injected, but this is early days. It should also be compared in a blind study to people who have antibodies living with family members who came down with COVID but were never vaxxed.
 

naegling62

Veteran Member
Pay attention to people dying in their sleep. I don't know the statistics pre vax but I've had 2 family members almost die from cardiovascular events after midnight. One was woken up and the other would have normally been asleep. Both incidents would have led to death and both were vaccinated. We are hearing and reading the same in other folks.
 

Josie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I want to take this opportunity to humbly apologize for my skepticism about vax shedding. I was totally wrong. I honestly didn’t think it was possible for something like that to happen.
I didn't either, Dennis. I thought it was just woo crazy talk. But I have seen so much crazy lately that I will not discount anything outright. I already suspect that our air, water and food has already been contaminated.
I'm not worrying about this because worrying will not add 1 hour, much less a day to my life and instead living my best life, counting each day as a blessing, and clinging to Christ. I am however voting for Trump in 2024 because I want to see retribution exacted on these murderers because voting for any other false-faced, tampon-wearing, NWO-leaning-snowflake politician will not bring about that retribution.
I'm there with you BE. Probably nothing I can do about it and if it's God's will that I am taken out by this particular plague, I'm going to try my best to come back, hunt down those responsible and haunt them so badly their reward will be hell on earth.
 
Last edited:

sleepyeddie

Senior Member
I want to take this opportunity to humbly apologize for my skepticism about vax shedding. I was totally wrong. I honestly didn’t think it was possible for something like that to happen.
I`m of the opinion that you or any body else who is a skeptic and wrong about anything, owe no one an apology.

We are all human, and will continue to be wrong about a myriad of things for the rest of our lives.

Skeptics in society are absolutely necessary to hold accountable the viewpoints that are delivered as truth and fact.

Skeptics bring new ideas and concepts that not everyone is able to derive on their own.

From what I can tell; this board is about a group of mostly like minded people who are skeptical about most everything government delivers to us.

Please continue to be skeptical about anything and everything.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
So since it was brought up in a post here, some suggest that this might have been the acceptance of the mark. Is that correct? How can that be? It doesn’t follow the what the Bible teaches. Having to do with buying or selling.

Not wanting to turn this into a religious thread. But the jab doesn’t fit the criteria … or does it? And based on the discussion of shedding … it surely doesn’t fit it. One has to knowingly understand what they’re accepting? Right?
This ONE answer--then go to the REL sig where I believe there's a whole thread discussing this.

no. definitely is not that. Remember that THE mark includes either worship of some man or system or a personal statement of allegiance to same. I'm thinking it will be something like a loyalty oath--and I CAN see the present ones in power demanding that. Let some MAJOR disaster hit--something that rapidly decimates a LOT of the earth's population--and this will be introduced as a means not only of "identifying who's left" but also "identifying /separating good, loyal citizens of the world from TERRORISTS"--and of course you all know who the Left already thinks are "terrorists".

BUT--I certainly believe this is laying the GROUNDWORK for it.

See REL sig.
 
Top