GOV/MIL Shocking NIH.gov Article Exposes the Coverup - COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?

[China Connection]

The names one would get would be just for the puppets who think they are somebody.

 

[Bridey Rose]

Thanks, Double A.
I shared this with some family members. This was the first reply I received:

​

It would be more honest to note that this is an editorial article in an internet-only journal with very low readership and impact. It is not a government publication, and it is not endorsed by any government agency. It is one man's opinion offered with no peer-reviewed evidence. The government website simple lists it as one of thousands of articles related to medicine and health. ​

That one man offering his opinion is Russel Blaylock, an eminent neurosurgeon with an open mind regarding alternative therapies. I highly recommend his book, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients. This highly experienced brain surgeon is no lightweight by any means.

And by definition, editorials do not receive peer review -- that's why they're called "editorials"! And it's not government endorsed because the government is a key player in this entire fiasco, which Dr. Blaylock makes patently obvious!

Is your skeptical family member a medical professor, brain surgeon, and published medical author?