ALERT RoundUp -> Mentall Illness, Obesity, Infertility, Birth Defects

NC Susan

Deceased
Monsanto’s Roundup Ready Crops Leading to Mental Illness, Obesity


Mike Barrett
NaturalSociety
December 15, 2011
http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-roundup-ready-crops-decreased-gut-flora/

pesticidesprayleaves1-210x131.jpg
It seems that the good bacteria found in your gut may actually be destroyed with every bite of food that you eat. While antibiotics typically hold first prize in depleting the body’s gut flora levels, there may be a new culprit looking to take the spotlight which you may know as genetically modified food.
Monsanto’s Roundup Ready Crops Leading to Decreased Gut Flora

A formula seems to have been made to not only ruin the agricultural system, but also compromise the health of millions of people worldwide. With the invent of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready crops, resistant superweeds are taking over farmland and public health is being attacked. These genetically engineered crops are created to withstand large amounts of Monsanto’s top-selling herbicide, Roundup. As it turns out, glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is actually leaving behind its residue on Roundup Ready crops, causing further potential concern for public health.
According to Dr. Don Huber, an expert in certain science fields relating to genetically modified foods, the amount of good bacteria in the gut decreases with the consumption of GMO foods. But this outcome is actually due to the residual glyphosate in animal feed and food. Dr. Huber states that glyphosate residues in genetically engineered plants are responsible for a significant reduction in mineral content, causing people to be highly susceptible to pathogens. Although studies have previously found that the beneficial bacteria in animals is destroyed thanks to glyphosate, a stronger connection will need to be made regarding human health for this kind of information to stick.
Poor Gut Flora Means Poor Health

As awareness grows, more and more people are realizing that poor gut flora often means poor health. Without the proper ratio of good bacteria to bad bacteria, overall health suffers and you could be left feeling depressed. In fact, poor gut health has been directly tied to mental illness, which may explain the influx of people being diagnosed with a mental illness. Not only that, but obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have all been tied to poor gut health.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/world’s-top-commercial-weed-liller-linked-to-infertility-scientist/

World’s Top Commercial Weed Killer Linked to Infertility: Scientist

LifeSiteNews.com
May 11, 2011

fieldcanola 210x131 World’s Top Commercial Weed Killer Linked to Infertility: ScientistThe world’s top herbicide for decades has come under criticism after evidence surfaced suggesting that the chemical may be linked to infertility and miscarriage in animals, raising serious concerns about the possible effect on human consumers.

Glyphosate is the weed-killing ingredient introduced over 30 years ago by the multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation Monsanto under the brand name Roundup. Monsanto also produces “Roundup Ready” corn, soybeans and cotton genetically engineered to withstand large doses of Roundup that would be deadly to normal plants.

But Dr. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University and a well-known plant pathologist, wrote to both American and European officials earlier this year to express his concern over a newly-discovered, extremely small organism that has appeared in higher concentrations in conjunction with Roundup and Roundup Ready crops.

The “electron microscopic pathogen,” Huber wrote in a Jan 16 letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack, “appears to significantly impact the health of plants, animals, and probably human beings,” noting that preliminary experiments have been able to reproduce the pathogen’s effect of causing miscarriages.

Huber urged the Secretary to delay deregulation of Roundup Ready crops, saying that “such approval could be a calamity.” “I believe the threat we are facing from this pathogen is unique and of a high risk status. In layman’s terms, it should be treated as an emergency,” he wrote.

Lyndsay Cole, media coordinator for the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, told LifeSiteNews.com Tuesday that Vilsack had received the letter and encouraged “submission of any data or studies in support of his concerns.”

Eleven days after the date of Huber’s letter, the USDA announced its decision to fully deregulate Roundup Ready Alfalfa.
540x80 papaya leaf extract World’s Top Commercial Weed Killer Linked to Infertility: Scientist

Huber’s letter was only one of many criticisms aimed at Monsanto recently, with several environmentalist groups and others calling for a global ban on the product that has netted the company billions in sales despite its troubling environmental track record. More evidence of the danger of glyphosate emerged in 2010; a study by scientists in Argentina concluded that glyphosate caused mutations in embryonic frogs and chicks, according to Reuters.

Glyphosate-based herbicides have also been available under generic brand names after Monsanto’s patent expired in 2000.

Reuters reports that the Environmental Protection Agency is investigating the possible dangers of glyphosate and has set a deadline of 2015 for determining what action, if any, the government should take against it.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/more-evidence-linking-pesticides-to-birth-defects/

Exposure to this Chemical is Linked to Birth Defects


Mike Barrett
NaturalSociety
October 24, 2011
pesticidesign-210x131.jpg
About 6 months ago pesticides were once again recognized by the mainstream media for the destruction they are causing to plants, animals, the environment, and humans, but some people may not have heard this news. The report revealed a further connection between the top selling herbicide Roundup and its causing of birth defects and disruption of male hormones due to the main active ingredient – glyphosate.
Andres Carrasco, chief scientist at the National Council for Sciences and also head of the molecular Embryology Lab at the University of Buenos Aires, once again proved the connection between glyphosate and birth defects. The ingredient found in Roundup has been shown to cause cyclopia (a single eye on the forehead), infertility, stillbirths, miscarriages, and cancer.
After Carrasco was run down by a mob after presenting his findings, he stated:
“I didn’t discover anything new. I just confirmed what other scientists discovered. In spite of the evidence, they still tried to run down 30 years of my reputation as a scientist. …. They know they can’t cover up the sun with one hand. There is scientific proof and, above all, there are hundreds of affected towns [that] are a living evidence of this public health emergency.”
The Effects of Roundup and Glyphosate Have Been Known for Decades

Carrasco was right, he didn’t discover anything new regarding Roundup and glyphosate and there harmful effects. In fact, it has been known for decades that glyphosate is responsible for birth defects. It was known as early as the 1980′s by industry and EU regulators that Roundup caused birth defects, but they simply failed to inform the public of such findings. A special report even shows that the industry’s own studies (including one commissioned by Monsanto) make it very clear that Roundup and glyphosate cause birth defects in laboratory animals.
Not only has the pesticide industry known this information for decades, but none of the information was made public, with glyphosate even being deemed as ‘safe’. The EU commission signed off on the current approval of glyphosate with full knowledge that the ingredients causes malformations. What’s worse is that the birth defects caused by Roundup and glyphosate can be triggered with extremely low doses of the pesticide – much lower than the amount sprayed on crops.
Reduce Pesticide Exposure

It is unfortunate that pesticides are being used so rampantly in agriculture. Millions are spent each year on pesticides in order to rid the soil of weeds while at the same time food crops are being genetically modified to withstand extreme amount of pesticide exposure. This extremely irresponsible type of agriculture is leading to the creation of superweeds which require a huge amount of pesticide spray to be killed due to built up resistance. At the same time, the incredible amount of pesticides being sprayed is also being sprayed on the crops and is traveling through the air, affecting other farmers and sometimes organic crops.

The easiest thing to do to avoid pesticide exposure is to eat organic crops since they are not tainted with pesticides. You should also check on the Environmental Working Group‘s guide to pesticides for their ‘dirty doze’ report to see which fruits possess the highest amounts of pesticides. They also provide a ‘clean 15′ to show the top 15 least contaminated fruits and vegetables. Some other things you can do is rinse fruits and vegetables under filtered or purified water and scrub produce with hard surfaces such as melon or cucumbers with a brush.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/world%E2%80%99s-top-commercial-weed-liller-linked-to-infertility-scientist/

World’s Top Commercial Weed Killer Linked to Infertility: Scientist


LifeSiteNews.com
May 11, 2011
fieldcanola-210x131.jpg
The world’s top herbicide for decades has come under criticism after evidence surfaced suggesting that the chemical may be linked to infertility and miscarriage in animals, raising serious concerns about the possible effect on human consumers.
Glyphosate is the weed-killing ingredient introduced over 30 years ago by the multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation Monsanto under the brand name Roundup. Monsanto also produces “Roundup Ready” corn, soybeans and cotton genetically engineered to withstand large doses of Roundup that would be deadly to normal plants.
But Dr. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University and a well-known plant pathologist, wrote to both American and European officials earlier this year to express his concern over a newly-discovered, extremely small organism that has appeared in higher concentrations in conjunction with Roundup and Roundup Ready crops.
The “electron microscopic pathogen,” Huber wrote in a Jan 16 letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack, “appears to significantly impact the health of plants, animals, and probably human beings,” noting that preliminary experiments have been able to reproduce the pathogen’s effect of causing miscarriages.
Huber urged the Secretary to delay deregulation of Roundup Ready crops, saying that “such approval could be a calamity.” “I believe the threat we are facing from this pathogen is unique and of a high risk status. In layman’s terms, it should be treated as an emergency,” he wrote.
Lyndsay Cole, media coordinator for the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, told LifeSiteNews.com Tuesday that Vilsack had received the letter and encouraged “submission of any data or studies in support of his concerns.”
Eleven days after the date of Huber’s letter, the USDA announced its decision to fully deregulate Roundup Ready Alfalfa.

Huber’s letter was only one of many criticisms aimed at Monsanto recently, with several environmentalist groups and others calling for a global ban on the product that has netted the company billions in sales despite its troubling environmental track record. More evidence of the danger of glyphosate emerged in 2010; a study by scientists in Argentina concluded that glyphosate caused mutations in embryonic frogs and chicks, according to Reuters.
Glyphosate-based herbicides have also been available under generic brand names after Monsanto’s patent expired in 2000.
Reuters reports that the Environmental Protection Agency is investigating the possible dangers of glyphosate and has set a deadline of 2015 for determining what action, if any, the government should take against it.

---------------------------------------------
http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-infertility-linked-roundup-found-in-all-urine-samples-tested/

Monsanto’s Infertility-Linked Roundup Found in All Urine Samples Tested


Mike Barrett
NaturalSociety
January 26, 2012
pesticidesbackpack-210x131.png
A recent study conducted by a German university found very high concentrations of Glyphosate, a carcinogenic chemical found in herbicides like Monsanto’s Roundup, in all urine samples tested. The amount of glyphosate found in the urine was staggering, with each sample containing concentrations at 5 to 20-fold the limit established for drinking water. This is just one more piece of evidence that herbicides are, at the very least, being sprayed out of control.
Glyphosate in Monsanto’s Roundup Impacting Global Health

This news comes only one month after it was found that glyphosate, contained in Monsanto’s Roundup, is contaminating the groundwater in the areas in which it is used. What does this mean? It means that toxic glyphosate is now polluting the world’s drinking water through the widespread contamination of aquifers, wells and springs. The recent reports of glyphosate showing up in all urine samples only enhances these past findings.
Monsanto continues to make the claim that their Roundup products are completely safe for both animals and humans. However many environmentalists, scientists , activists, and even doctors say otherwise. Glyphosate radically affects the metabolism of plants in a negative way. It is a systemic poison preventing the formation of essential amino acids, leading to weakened plants which ultimately die from it.
A formula seems to have been made to not only ruin the agricultural system, but also compromise the health of millions of people worldwide. With the invent of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready crops, resistant superweeds are taking over farmland and public health is being attacked. As it turns out, glyphosate is also leaving behind its residue on Roundup Ready crops, causing further potential concern for public health. Glyphosate is even contributing to escalating rates of mental illness and obesity through the depletion of beneficial gut flora that directly regulates these functions. But it certainly doesn’t stop there.
Researchers tested roundup on mature male rats at a concentration range between 1 and 10,000 parts per million (ppm), and found that within 1 to 48 hours of exposure, testicular cells of the mature rats were either damaged or killed. Even at a concentration of 1 ppm, the Roundup was able to affect the test subjects by decreasing their testosterone concentrations by as much as 35%.
Note: You will need to translate the study to English via one of the many translators available.

--------------------------------------
http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-best-selling-herbicide-roundup-linked-to-infertility/

Monsanto’s Best-Selling Herbicide Roundup Linked to Infertility


Andre Evans
NaturalSociety
January 21, 2012
pesticideplanefly-210x131.jpg
A recent study has found that Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide may be responsible for causing infertility. After reviewing the many already well-documented negative impacts Roundup has on the environment and living creatures, it is no surprise to add yet another item to the list.
Researchers tested roundup on mature male rats at a concentration range between 1 and 10,000 parts per million (ppm), and found that within 1 to 48 hours of exposure, testicular cells of the mature rats were either damaged or killed. According to the study, even at a concentration of 1 ppm, the Roundup was able to affect the test subjects by decreasing their testosterone concentrations by as much as 35%.


How can such small levels of exposure have such a profound effect on the reproductive system? Roundup, being a glyphosate-based herbicide is also known to have endocrine disrupting properties.Monsanto’s Best-Selling Herbicide Roundup Linked to Infertility

Much like BPA, glyphosate-based herbicides have the ability to interfere with the natural hormonal balance in the human body, thereby introducing a number of health risks along with even the smallest levels of exposure. These chemicals are strong enough to affect your metabolism, behavior and mood, reproductive organs, and even provoke cancer.
As a result, any plants that are sprayed with roundup carry with them a chemical effect similar to that of other endocrine disruptors, offsetting the hormonal balance and causing adverse effects, despite even the smallest levels of exposure. This in part contributes to the number of males with increased fertility issues in more recent times.
It is no surprise that Monsanto, a company already infamous for a whole slew of dangerous concoctions, would also be responsible for affecting another major aspect of human health on a large scale.
Ultimately it is highly important to avoid any products sprayed with pesticides or herbicides for the many associated health risks – now fertility included. In addition to avoiding food which has been tarnished by this pesticide, you may also want to consider investing in a water filter. The carcinogenic chemical Roundup contains known as glyphosate has been found to be contaminating the groundwater in areas it is being applied in.
Being aware of the hormonal disruptors you face in your daily life such as BPA and now Roundup is a must. Even the smallest levels of exposure can have the large negative effects.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-pesticide-found-to-infect-plants-with-aids-like-disease/

Monsanto Pesticide Found to Infect Plants with AIDS-like Disease


Ethan A. Huff
NaturalNews
May 19, 2011
plant1-210x131.jpg
When Dr. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University and internationally-recognized plant pathologist, wrote a letter back in January to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack, warning him about a new mystery disease showing up primarily in genetically-modified (GM) crops, the notice fell on deaf ears.
Research conducted by a team of senior plant and animal scientists found that Monsanto’s glyphosate chemical, which is the primary ingredient in its popular RoundUp herbicide formula, appears responsible for infecting plants with an AIDS-like syndrome that destroys their immunity, blocks their absorption of certain vitamins and minerals, and eventually kills them.
Dr. Huber explains in his letter that the destruction caused by glyphosate does not appear limited to plants, either –animals and humans alike that consume foods tainted with the chemical, or that are exposed in some other way to it, are potentially susceptible to developing the same autoimmune disorder. For this reason, Dr. Huber urged the USDA to further investigate RoundUp, as well as to deny the deregulation of GM alfalfa.


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032441_pesticide_AIDS.html#ixzz1iAsFDoCx

pot-plants-2.jpg
Monsanto pesticide found to infect plants with AIDS-like disease

Wednesday, May 18, 2011 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer





(NaturalNews) When Dr. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University and internationally-recognized plant pathologist, wrote a letter back in January to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack, warning him about a new mystery disease showing up primarily in genetically-modified (GM) crops, the notice fell on deaf ears.

Research conducted by a team of senior plant and animal scientists found that Monsanto's glyphosate chemical, which is the primary ingredient in its popular RoundUp herbicide formula, appears responsible for infecting plants with an AIDS-like syndrome that destroys their immunity, blocks their absorption of certain vitamins and minerals, and eventually kills them.

Dr. Huber explains in his letter that the destruction caused by glyphosate does not appear limited to plants, either -- animals and humans alike that consume foods tainted with the chemical, or that are exposed in some other way to it, are potentially susceptible to developing the same autoimmune disorder. For this reason, Dr. Huber urged the USDA to further investigate RoundUp, as well as to deny the deregulation of GM alfalfa.

You can read a copy of Dr. Huber's letter for yourself here:
http://es-la.facebook.com/notes/wood-prairie-farm/the-complete-text-o...

The key factor of Dr. Huber's discovery was a microscopic pathogen specifically prevalent in GM crops. The pathogen, he explained in an interview with Food Democracy Now! (FDN) as well as in his letter, is common. But an apparent weakening of plant immunity by glyphosate makes plants treated with the chemical more susceptible to contracting the harmful pathogen. And as a result of exposure, large swaths of GM farmland have died, and many animals that feed on GM-tainted meal have become infertile or have had abortions.

But instead of listening to the scientifically sound advice of Dr. Huber and withholding deregulation of GM alfalfa until more intense safety studies could be conducted, the USDA decided to ignore it all and approve the "Frankencrop" anyway.

To watch the full video interview between FDN and Dr. Huber, visit:
http://vimeo.com/22997532

Sources for this story include:

http://www.bnet.com/blog/food-industry/mystery-science-more-details-o...
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-roundup-superweeds-consuming-4-million-hectares/

Monsanto’s Roundup Spawns Superweeds Consuming Over 120 Million Hectares


Anthony Gucciardi
NaturalSociety
November 30, 2011
pesticidesprayleaves-210x131.jpg
Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide Roundup has created a new category of superweeds that are heavily resistant to the herbicide that Roundup contains known as glyphosate. These resistant weeds currently cover over 4.5 million hectares in the United States alone, though experts estimate the world-wide land coverage to have reached at least 120 million hectares by 2010. The onset of superweeds is being increasingly documented in Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Europe and South Africa.
Meanwhile, Monsanto pushes its genetically modified crops and biopesticides under the guise of helping the environment and reducing pesticide use. In reality, the resistant weeds are now so resistant to Roundup that they require significantly more pesticides. Due to the large-scale use of Roundup, pesticide spraying will have to increase worldwide in order to combat the new superweeds. Of course the company is refusing to accept responsibility for the escalating cost of combating the weeds, stating that “Roundup agricultural warranties will not cover the failure to control glyphosate resistant weed populations.”
Superweeds, Mutant Insects, and a Devastated Environment

Roundup is not the only Monsanto invention tearing up the environment and producing super resistant organisms. The usage of genetically modified Bt, a biopesticide manufactured by Monsanto, has created a number of new mutated insect species. Research has confirmed that at least 8 populations of insects have developed resistance, with 2 populations resistant to Bt sprays and 6 species resistant to Bt crops as a whole. As a result, biotech scientists are now further genetically modifying the Bt to kill the mutated insects. This is despite the fact that tests have indicated that the additional modification will provide ‘little or no advantage’ in fending off the super insects.
All of this is being done instead of simply turning to sustainable and organic farming practices that do not yield super resistant, mutated organisms of any kind. Even the researchers conducting the research on Bt concluded that alternative organic farming methods would provide a more environmentally-friendly alternative in which there would be no dependence on bloated corporations like Monsanto:
Alternative organic, sustainable methods of farming provide a realistic alternative, independent of reliance on agrobiotech corporations.


-----------------------------------------------
http://naturalsociety.com/biotech-quick-fix-for-superweeds-could-lead-to-super-superweeds/


Biotech Quick Fix for Superweeds Could Lead to ‘Super Superweeds’


Jonathan Benson
NaturalNews
June 22, 2011
fieldcanola1-210x131.jpg
Albert Einstein once defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. And that is exactly how the biotechnology industry and government agencies are trying to handle the escalating “superweed” epidemic.
According to a recent report out of Washington University (WU) in St. Louis, Mo., the chemical industry’s answer to genetically-modified (GM) induced superweeds is to now tamper with the genetics of the superweeds themselves, which may appear to provide a quick fix, but will eventually spur an even worse breed of “super superweeds.”
Superweeds, of course, are the byproduct of genetically-engineered (GE) crops that have been programmed to resist certain pesticides and herbicides. Use of these chemicals has increased as a result, and the weeds they were designed to kill have over time developed a resistance to them as well, having mutated into what we now know as superweeds (http://www.naturalnews.com/weeds.html).
But instead of recognizing the problem as having stemmed from GE technology in the first place, purveyors of GMOs are now looking at ways to genetically modify superweeds. This insane notion will most likely not even work, but even worse is the fact that it is sure to exacerbate the problem even further to the point that there will eventually be no way to control ever-mutating stocks of “Frankenweeds.”
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/032777_superweeds_biotech.html#ixzz1iAu9ICdo




 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-roundup-shown-to-be-ravaging-butterfly-population/

Monsanto’s Roundup Shown to be Ravaging Butterfly Population


http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-roundup-shown-to-be-ravaging-butterfly-population/Mike Barrett
NaturalSociety
March 6, 2012
GMOfieldstorm1-220x141.png
Monsanto’s Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate, has been tied to more health and environmental problems than you could imagine. Similar to how pesticides have been contributing to the bee decline, Monsanto’s Roundup has been tied to the decrease in the population of monarch butterflies by killing the very plants that the butterflies rely on for habitat and food. What’s been shown to be an even greater threat to the population, though, is Monsanto’s Roundup Ready corn and soybeans.
Roundup Ready Crops and Glyphosate Leading to Downfall of Insect Populations

A 2011 study published in the journal Insect Conservation and Diversity found that increasing acreage of genetically modified Roundup Ready corn and soybeans is heavily contributing to the decline in monarch butterfly populations within North America. Milkweed, a plant butterflies rely on for habitat and food, is being destroyed by the heavy use of glyphosate-based pesticides and Roundup Ready crops. Over the past 17 years, the monarch butterfly population in central Mexico has declined, reaching an all-time low in 2009-2010.
“This milkweed has disappeared from at least 100 million acres of these row crops,” said Dr. Taylor, an insect ecologist at the University of Kansas and director of the research and conservation program Monarch Watch. “Your milkweed is virtually gone…this [glyphosate use on RR crops] is the one main factor that has happened…you look at parts of the Midwest where there is a tremendous use of these crops and you see monarch populations dropping. It’s hard to deny the conclusion.”
According to the Department of Agriculture, in 2011 94 percent of soybeans and 72 percent of corn grown in the United States were herbicide-tolerant. Due to this increase, the amount of Roundup used on crops in 2007 was 5 times higher than in 1997, only one year after Roundup Ready crops were available.
Another study published int he journal Crop Protection and conducted by Robert G Hartzler, an agronomist at Iowa State, found that milkweed on farms in Iowa declined 90 percent from 1999 to 2009. Additionally, his study found milkweed only on 8 percent of corn and soybean fields surveyed in 2009, which is 51 percent lower than in 1999.
Although the butterfly population may be suffering, humans are taking heat from Monsanto’s creations as well. Past research has shown that Monsanto’s Roundup ready crops are leading to mental illness and obesity, primarily by destroying the amount of good bacteria found in the gut. The corporation’s Roundup, containing glyphosate, has also been shown to cause infertility and birth defects.
Glyphosate is so present today that it has been found to be polluting the world’s drinking water through the widespread contamination of aquifers, wells, and springs. What may be most shocking is that very high concentrations of glyphosate have been found in 100 percent of urine samples tested in a recent study.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/usda-monsantos-roundup-herbicide-damages-soil/

USDA: Monsanto’s Roundup Herbicide Damages Soil


Anthony Gucciardi
NaturalSociety
August 20, 2011
pesticides1-210x131.jpg
Following a report that U.S. regulators were completely aware of the fact that the best-selling herbicide product Roundup causes birth defects, the USDA is now announcing that it also damages the soil.
USDA: Monsanto’s Roundup Herbicide Damages Soil

USDA scientist Robert Kremer summarized the findings:
The heavy use of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide appears to be causing harmful changes in soil and potentially hindering yields of the genetically modified crops that farmers are cultivating, a US government scientist said on Friday. Repeated use of the chemical glyphosate, the key ingredient in Roundup herbicide, impacts the root structure of plants, and 15 years of research indicates that the chemical could be causing fungal root disease, said Bob Kremer, a microbiologist with the US Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service.
Mother Jones reports:
Now, Kremer has been raising these concerns for a couple of years now—and as Tom Laskaway showed in this 2010 Grist article, the USDA has been downplaying them for just as long. Laskaway asked Kremer’s boss at the Agricultural Research Service, Michael Shannon, to comment on Kremer’s research. According to Laskaway, Shannon “admitted that Kremer’s results are valid, but said that the danger they represent pales in comparison to the superweed threat.”
So let’s get this straight: The head of the USDA’s crop-research service agrees that Roundup damages soil and thinks the superweed problem is even more troublesome.In the face of these two menaces, you might expect the USDA to intervene to curtail Roundup use. But Shannon meant his statement as a rationale for ignoring Kremer’s work. Meanwhile, the USDA keeps approving new Roundup Ready crops—ensuring that the herbicide’s domain over US farmland will expand dramatically.
Kremer commented on his employer’s reception of his work in a Reuters article last year:

“This could be something quite big. We might be setting up a huge problem,” said Kremer, who expressed alarm that regulators were not paying enough attention to the potential risks from biotechnology on the farm, including his own research…”Science is not being considered in policy setting and deregulation,” said Kremer. “This research is important. We need to be vigilant.”
Meanwhile, at a conference in Boulder, Colorado, in early August, another mainstream ag expert raised serious concerns about the poison, according to an account in Boulder Weekly. Iowa-based consultant Michael McNeill, who has a Ph.D. in quantitative genetics and plant pathology from Iowa State University, advises large-scale corn and soy farmers on weed control and soil fertility. He’s observing trends in the field that are consistent with Kremer’s research. Here’s Boulder Weekly:
McNeill explains that glyphosate is a chelating agent, which means it clamps onto molecules that are valuable to a plant, like iron, calcium, manganese, and zinc.…The farmers’ increased use of Roundup is actually harming their crops, according to McNeill, because it is killing micronutrients in the soil that they need, a development that has been documented in several scientific papers by the nation’s leading experts in the field. For example, he says, harmful fungi and parasites like fusarium, phytopthora and pythium are on the rise as a result of the poison, while beneficial fungi and other organisms that help plants reduce minerals to a usable state are on the decline. He explains that the overuse of glyphosate means that oxidizing agents are on the rise, creating oxides that plants can’t use, leading to lower yields and higher susceptibility to disease.
According to McNeill, problems with Roundup aren’t limited to the soil—they also extend to Roundup Ready crops and the animals that eat them.
McNeill says he and his colleagues are seeing a higher incidence of infertility and early-term abortion in cattle and hogs that are fed on GMO crops. He adds that poultry fed on the suspect crops have been exhibiting reduced fertility rates.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://naturalsociety.com/monsantos-carcinogenic-roundup-herbicide-contaminating-water-supply/

Monsanto’s Carcinogenic Roundup Herbicide Contaminating Water Supply


Anthony Gucciardi
NaturalSociety
December 15, 2011
waterfaucet2-210x131.jpg
New research has confirmed what myself and other health conscious individuals have been saying about Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide Roundup — the carcinogenic chemical it contains known as glyphosate has been found to be contaminating the groundwater in areas it is being applied in. What does this mean? It means that toxic glyphosate is now polluting the world’s drinking water through the widespread contamination of aquifers, wells and springs.
The explosive study that confirmed the contamination effect of Monsanto’s Roundup was published in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry last month, in which researchers discovered that 41% of the 140 groundwater samples taken from Catalonia Spain were actually above the limit of quantification. This means that glyphosate was actually not breaking down rapidly, despite Monsanto’s claims that the chemical would do so. Without the key ability to readily break down, it is apparent that glyphosate is polluting groundwater in alarming quantities, enough to pose a significant threat to the purity of drinking water wherever it is used.
It is also important to note that due to its resistance to biodegradability, glyphosate may be lurking in nature for a very long time. But is there really cause for concern?
Glyphosate is carcinogenic and neurotoxic

Glyphosate is classified by the the EPA as a Class III toxic substance, and can kill an adult in as little as 30 grams. Even more concerning is the fact that glyphosate, and Monsanto’s Roundup as a whole, have been linked to conditions such as:

  • Hormonal disorders
  • Lymphoma
  • DNA damage
  • Endocrine disease
  • Skin cancer
  • Kidney damage
  • Liver damage
It is clear that even a little glyphosate in your drinking water is dangerous, but we aren’t seeing a little glyphosate in the groundwater samples. Instead, we are seeing the extreme contamination of otherwise pure water, all for the purpose of spraying crops that you eat with Monsanto’s carcinogenic Roundup. It is time for Monsanto to stop threatening public health, the environment, and the future of the planet. Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide should be banned for its adverse impact on health and the environment.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
Glyphosate-based herbicides have also been available under generic brand names after Monsanto’s patent expired in 2000.

Reuters reports that the Environmental Protection Agency is investigating the possible dangers of glyphosate and has set a deadline of 2015 for determining what action, if any, the government should take against it.

------------------------------------------------

http://westernfarmpress.com/markets/glyphosate-market-grows-gm-crops-spread

Glyphosate market grows as GM crops spread


  • Glyphosate represents the largest selling agrochemical product worldwide.
  • As of 2009, glyphosate accounted for a share of about 25 percent of the global herbicides market.
  • The industry has been reeling under severe surplus capacity issues, and prices plunged substantially, creating a near crisis in the industry.



Global Industry Analysts
Oct. 11, 2011 8:30am





The global market for glyphosate is forecast to reach 1.35 million metric tons by the year 2017. Major factors driving growth in the global glyphosate market include lack of a substitution to glyphosate, growing adoption/planting of glyphosate-ready genetically modified (GM) crops, rising use of no-till or minimum-till systems, and expected increase in bio-fuel projects in several countries worldwide.
Glyphosate represents the largest selling agrochemical product worldwide. As of 2009, glyphosate accounted for a share of about 25 percent of the global herbicides market. The herbicide continues to be a major contributor in the global crop protection sector, despite being a generic product. Current market environment in the glyphosate market is characterized by intense competition, with several generic players operating in the market, which predominantly include Chinese manufacturers.
Of late, the industry has been reeling under severe surplus capacity issues, and prices plunged substantially, creating a near crisis in the industry. The drop in demand due to factors such as the global recession brought these issues to the fore. However, things do not appear as grim for glyphosate in the future. Demand for glyphosate began picking up, and the market is expected to post positive growth in 2011, following two years of significant declines. However, much of the growth foreseeable for 2011 and 2012 is expected to be a result of volume growth, as prices continue to lurch at levels lower than the peak witnessed in 2008. Glyphosate prices began witnessing an increase in late 2010, in part accredited to increase in prices of raw materials used in its manufacture.
Asia-Pacific represents the largest regional market for glyphosate worldwide, as stated by the new market research report on glyphosate. The U.S. trails behind the Asia-Pacific market. Growth in the market would be led by Asia-Pacific, which is projected to be the fastest growing regional market during the analysis period, growing at a compounded annual growth rate of more than 10 percent. In terms of production, China is the leading producer of glyphosate in the world. In 2008, China contributed to more than 30 percent of the world’s total glyphosate production. More than 80 percent of China’s total glyphosate production is exported to around 95 countries around the globe.


Glyphostate resistance

Glyphosate has been employed as a non-specific herbicide for nearly three decades, and the continuous usage of the herbicide in crops resulted in the emergence as well as spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds in crops, such as corn, cotton, and soybeans. Resistance from problematic weeds has turned out to be one of the major concerns for the glyphosate industry, as it endangers the survival of economic crop plants. Moreover, this poses a threat to farmers employing glyphosate as the primary weed control agent.
Launch of glyphosate tolerant, genetically modified crops, and the innovation of newer glyphosate formulations that possess a mode of action different from the traditional glyphosate, constitute the two ways of managing resistant weeds, and resultantly strengthening the position of glyphosate on the herbicides market. The growing adoption/planting of glyphosate ready genetically modified crops is expected to drive growth in the global glyphosate market through to the year 2017.
Significant revenue growth and profits from the manufacture of glyphosate attracted several new players to the market after the original product, Monsanto’s Roundup, went off-patent in late 2000. Presently, Monsanto and several players in China manufacture glyphosate. In addition to these players, the glyphosate industry is also dotted with the presence of several other players, who are primarily engaged in the purchase and resale of glyphosate ingredient, and in the manufacture of glyphosate-based herbicides.
Major players profiled in the report include Monsanto Company, Syngenta AG, Nufarm Limited, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Zhejiang Wynca Chemical Group Co. Ltd., Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemical Co. Ltd., Shandong Weifang Rainbow Chemical, Anhui Huaxing Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Dow AgroSciences LLC, among others.
The report titled “Glyphosate: A Global Strategic Business Report” announced by Global Industry Analysts Inc., provides a comprehensive review of the glyphosate market, current market trends, key growth drivers, the production scenario and China’s dominance in the global production, an overview of competitive landscape, recent industry activity, and profiles of major/niche global as well as the regional market participants. The report provides annual sales estimates and projections for the glyphosate market for the years 2009 through 2017 for the following geographic markets - U.S., Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest of World. Also, a six-year (2003-2008) historic analysis is provided for additional perspective.
For more details about this comprehensive market research report, please visit http://www.strategyr.com/Glyphosate_Market_Report.asp.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
Birth Defects Linked to Monsanto’s Roundup Herbicide



http://blog.friendseat.com/roundup-herbicide-causing-animal-birth-defects

pesticide.jpg







Objective scientists and biologists not intimidated by the chemical or biotechnology industry, have claimed for years that Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide — specifically the active ingredient glyphosate — poses an extremely grave threat to public health. Yet their pleas have been universally ignored by government regulators around the world, many with ties to the chemical and biotechnology industry.
In a comprehensive article written by Lucia Graves for the Huffington Post, Graves reports on data released this month by Earth Open Source, a UK non-profit; the data suggests industry regulators in Europe have known for years that glyphosate, originally introduced by Monsanto in 1976, causes birth defects in the embryos of laboratory animals.
Partnering with half a dozen international scientists and researchers, the UK group drew its conclusions in part from studies conducted in a number of locations, including Argentina, Brazil, France and the United States, with respective research presentations as follows:
Glyphosate-herbicide.jpg

Argentina – Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Produce Teratogenic Effects on Vertebrates by Impairing Retinoic Acid Signaling Brazil – Reproduction and Developmental Toxicity
France – Glyphosate Formulations Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis
in Human Umbilical, Embryonic, and Placental Cells

United States - Pre-and postnatal toxicity of the commercial glyphosate formulation in Wistar rats
According to the EPA’s Pesticide Industry Sales & Usage Report for 2006-2007 published in February, 2011, the agricultural market used 180 to 185 million pounds of glyphosate between 2006 and 2007, while the non-agricultural market used 8 to 11 million pounds between 2005 and 2007.
The Earth Open Source study reveals regulators with the European Commission have known since 2002 that glyphosate causes developmental malformations in lab animals, yet the commission’s health and consumer division published a final review report of glyphosate in the same year approving its use in Europe for the next 10 years.
calf-birth.jpg

Website for this image

calf birth Birth Defects Linked to Monsantos Roundup Herbicide
blog.friendsea


According to the report, the European Commission won’t review glyphosate until 2015. And it won’t review the chemical under more stringent, up-to-date standards until 2030. Graves said the European Commission told HuffPost that it wouldn’t comment on whether it was already aware of studies demonstrating the toxicity of glyphosate in 2002. But it said the commission was aware of the Earth Open Source study and had discussed it with member states.
A commission official told HuffPost in an email that “Germany concluded…[the] study does not change the current safety assessment of gylphosate. This view is shared by all other member states.”
Although Roundup’s impact on humans remains unclear, Graves referenced one laboratory study done in France in 2005 that found Roundup and glyphosate caused the death of human placental cells.
Graves also cited another study conducted in 2009 that found Roundup caused total cell death in human umbilical, embryonic and placental cells within 24 hours. Yet researchers have conducted few follow-up studies.
soya-beans-round-up.jpg

“Obviously there’s a limit to what’s appropriate in terms of testing poison on humans,” said Jeffrey Smith, executive director of the Institute for Responsible Technology, which advocates against genetically modified food. “But if you look at the line of converging evidence,” says Smith, “it points to a serious problem. And if you look at the animal feeding studies with genetically modified Roundup ready crops, there’s a consistent theme of reproductive disorders, which we don’t know the cause for because follow-up studies have not been done.
“More independent research is needed to evaluate the toxicity of Roundup and glyphosate,” he added, “and the evidence that has already accumulated is sufficient to raise a red flag.”.......................
 

Berean

Veteran Member
Wow, when I saw this title I thought they were "rounding up everyone with Mentall Illness, Obesity, Infertility, and Birth Defects". I need to kick my woo-woo radar down a notch. :)
 

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Dr Huber is well known for his "opinions" with little scientific merit. http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/2011/GlyphosatesImpact11.pdf is by the Univerisity he retired from.


So, do you work directly for Monsanto, Kent?


Or are you just one of the many fools that believe the claptrap that their paid trolls publish as a smoke screen while they go merrily along producing their poisons, their GMO crap, and their terminator seeds?


-----------------



WARNING: I have no idea about Kent specifically, but it is a well know fact that Monsanto has paid individuals who watch websites such as this one, and post stuff to discredit any credible information about Monsanto and their poison products. Of course, they post rebuttals that have been craftily constructed by paid trolls on Monsanto's dime to look and sound really good, but they never expose the true origin of the official sounding misinformation to those who read the link. Thus in many cases, the folks who actually re-post the Monsanto PR material don't even realize themselves that they are being USED by Monsanto...


Hence my seemingly harsh comment above...
 

Kent

Inactive
So, do you work directly for Monsanto, Kent?


Or are you just one of the many fools that believe the claptrap that their paid trolls publish as a smoke screen while they go merrily along producing their poisons, their GMO crap, and their terminator seeds?


-----------------



WARNING: I have no idea about Kent specifically, but it is a well know fact that Monsanto has paid individuals who watch websites such as this one, and post stuff to discredit any credible information about Monsanto and their poison products. Of course, they post rebuttals that have been craftily constructed by paid trolls on Monsanto's dime to look and sound really good, but they never expose the true origin of the official sounding misinformation to those who read the link. Thus in many cases, the folks who actually re-post the Monsanto PR material don't even realize themselves that they are being USED by Monsanto...


Hence my seemingly harsh comment above...

No, just posting an opposing view with backup from a University. I did not realize opposing views were not allowed.

Since it is a "well known fact" Monsanto uses paid individuals you should not have any problem finding a legitimate source to post and back your clams.

I feel sorry for you that you have such a lack of facts that you need to resort to name calling and innuendo to support your beliefs.
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
Do you want to call ME a paid shill, Barry?

Seriously, guys... glyphosate has been shown to be one heck of a lot safer than many other herbicides.

IF "roundup ready" crops were causing major problems in animal fertility, we (those who are feeding animals and breeding livestock out here for a living) would be SEEING it. And as I've said before, we just AREN'T. Looking back at my own 35 years of records, we don't have any higher rate of abortions, sterile heifers, stillborn calves, etc than we ever have. I've chatted with my vet about it (and he's very much ANTI-big ag, and doesn't believe in a lot of the same things people rant about here- for just one example, he thinks that the majority of the new vaccines for children are simply "money makers" with little or no real benefit for the health of the child, and potentially large dangers compared to benefits).

His practice is almost totally dairy farms... from tiny ones like ours to some of the bigger (500-1000 milking cows) in our area. He isn't seeing any change in fertility/sterility problems, either... and those big farms are feeding TONS of "roundup ready" corn silage, and now "roundup ready" alfalfa in hay and silage.

Is it overused? Probably... glyphosate, along with the genetically modified plants which have been bred to tolerate it, was a HUGE boon for farmers who otherwise had to use a brew of two -or even more- chemicals which are MUCH more toxic to humans and animals, and which still had weed resistance developing.

However, we were seeing "super weeds" before the "roundup ready" plants were developed. Not on farms, so much. But in the suburbs, because so many people were using it constantly to keep their driveways, sidewalks, parking lots and other areas "weed free".

You who believe it's all toxic and that they're lying will be happy to know that the "super weeds" will win, soon enough. And then they'll try to develop a new "wonder product", which may actually BE toxic. But because there is almost no other way to grow crops on a commercial basis, the alternative is hunger on a huge scale. And that actually IS dangerous...

Don't get me wrong- we use as few chemicals as possible on our tiny farm. But unless you want to go back to those days where everyone had their few acres and were willing to spend hours every day hoeing the corn and winnowing the weed seeds out of their wheat before grinding it for their bread (and we'll have to kill off about 200 million people in this country for that to be remotely possible), these chemical weed and insect controls ARE the tradeoff.

Summerthyme
 

NC Susan

Deceased
snip from: http://blog.friendseat.com/sudden-death-syndrome-gmo-roundup-pathogen



Last year, Monsanto announced a new program that offers millions of dollars in rebates to farmers who combine Roundup with more herbicides manufactured by the company’s competitors to combat the glyphosate-resistant weeds threatening GM crops across the country.

“The mere presence of superweeds and the fact that Monsanto is now paying farmers to spray additional chemicals that are more toxic than Roundup, is evidence of a complete regulatory breakdown, according to watchdog group Center for Food Safety (CFS)”.

Additionally, a leading embryologist at the University of Buenos Aires Medical School published a study that shows glyphosate-based herbicides like Monsanto’s popular Roundup formula caused deformations in chicken embryos that resembled the kind of birth defects being reported in areas like La Leonesa, a small farm town in Argentina, where big agribusinesses depend on glyphosate to treat genetically engineered crops. And the study claimed the deformations resulted from much lower doses of herbicide than those commonly found on crops.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
and this 44 page pdf from Greenpeace linking Roundup (Isopropylamine Salts) to the above mentioned diseases and disorders and adding Non Hodgkins cancers and implicated in nerve disorders such as Parkinsons - and the statistics for the horrible defected pregnancies>

http://www.greenpeace.org/internati...agriculture/2011/363 - GlyphoReportDEF-LR.pdf


also mountain Clay soil types would have a vastly different decomposition effect with retention and run off , than red clay or sandy loam soils. Or for those of us on the east side of the Mississippi and the Gulf Coast that get much more rain than those in the Great Plains or high deserts.

(And let us all admit that agriculture professionals and weekend suburban lawn care are two vastly different customers and the ever increasing amounts of RoundUp used in driveways and back yards isnt being examined or tracked by the Country Extention Agents.)
 

RJC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Thanks for the articles NC Susan, we need constant reminders of these dangers.

When I was growing up in the 50’s my step father would never allow anyone near the weed spray he used to clear the miles of irrigation ditches we had on the 1500 acre farm, or for that matter any time he would spray pesticides.
 

mzkitty

I give up.
For me, the ultimate reality is that THEY want us all either dead, or incapacitated.

Look at what these poisons are killing -- the brain in your gut. So you will not pay attention to it like you should. Doesn't it make sense that only natural things are right for you? Why think that poisons are good for you? Are we that brainwashed already? There was a lot more to this study; I remember our newspaper published it back then.


Our Second Brain: The Stomach

States that human stomach has neurotransmitters similar to the brain. Functions of the stomach; How does the stomach communicates with the brain.

By PT Staff, published on May 01, 1999

HEALTH

Ever get a gut feeling about someone, or I anxious butterflies in your stomach? That's because you have a second brain in your bowel, according to Michael Gershon, M.D., author of The Second Brain (HarperCollins, 1999), and a neurobiologist at New York's Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. Gershon recently explained to PT how an independent network of over 100 billion neurons in the gut not only signals our bodies to stress but causes illness.

Q Why do we need a second brain?

A Most importantly, to control digestion. It also works with the immune system to protect us from hostile bacteria.

Q Does it use neurotransmitters?

A Actually, 95% of all serotonin in the body is in the gut, where it triggers digestion. Nerve cells in the gut also use serotonin to signal back to the brain. This information can train us not to eat certain foods by communicating pain, gas and other terrible feelings.


Q Does the brain in our heads influence the "second brain"?

A Yes. Butterflies in the stomach arise when the brain sends a message of anxiety to the gut, which sends messages back to the brain that it's unhappy. But the gut can also work in isolation.

Q How does this brain influence irritable bowel syndrome (lBS), which many believe is a psychological problem?

A Irritable bowel syndrome, whose symptoms include abdominal pain accompanied by loose stool, affects 20% of Americans. But doctors often dismiss its severity, attributing IBS to psychoneurosis because they don't know exactly what it is. I propose that the second brain is the cause. Antidepressants like SSRIs, when used in doses too low to treat depression, are effective immediately in IBS patients. Prozac takes weeks to kick in. This suggests that the drugs work not on the brains of people with IBS, but in the bowel.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199905/our-second-brain-the-stomach
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
Without modern methods (yes...evil herbicides, pesticides, fertilizer and crop genetics research) millions of people on this planet would starve to death. Life is always a tradeoff of risks...and the developers try to make modern agriculture safe for the end user and the environment. Unless a whole lotta folks want to volunteer to go without food, it's going to have to stay this way.

Grow your own or buy certified organic? May be OK for you...because you can afford it...time-wise and $$$-wise. Most can't. Remember...real farmers feed a lot of OTHER people besides just themselves. Thank God and modern farm practices for that one.

Added...the above posted "research articles" are nothing but paid advertisements for the anti-ag crowd. Works both ways, doesn't it?
 

Binkerthebear

Veteran Member
Wow, when I saw this title I thought they were "rounding up everyone with Mentall Illness, Obesity, Infertility, and Birth Defects". I need to kick my woo-woo radar down a notch. :)
Me, too. :spns: It does sound fairly logical with the government now telling us what to eat. The next step would be to round up those not following government dietary guidelines. Conservatives and libertarians obviously fall under the "mental illness" guidelines of the government round-up. Monsanto will insure that we all fall under one of these 'round-up' groups. Don't want to be rounded up ? Just sign on the dotted line agreeing to be a slave to the NWO I guess. Don't worry; in return you'll get free anti-depressants and a free 'mark of the beast' chip / tatoo. ("Free" here is, of course, another word for "required".) All will be well; don't worry 'bout a thing.
 

iamnoturmaid

Contributing Member
I personally don't want to ingest these products and will try to not ingest them. A year ago I stopped eating gluten, soy, corn, and dairy. My dizzyness which I had daily went away, panic attacks went away, depression went away, exhaustion went away. Now everytime i eat I don't feel like there are rocks in my stomach. I have adopted a paleo type diet and lost 13 pounds. It works for me...
 

NC Susan

Deceased
Story at-a-glance


  • One of the active ingredients in Agent Orange, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), a broadleaf herbicide, may be introduced directly into our food supply, as a result of weeds are becoming increasingly resistant to Monsanto’s broad-spectrum herbicide Roundup (glyphosate), which is used in massive quantities on all genetically engineered Roundup Ready crops. The answer, according to Dow AgriScience, is a triple-resistant crop that can survive being sprayed with this Agent Orange herbicide in addition to glyphosate and glufosinate
  • Researchers have linked 2,4-D to increased cancer risks, especially soft tissue sarcoma and malignant lymphoma, and higher rates of birth defects primarily involving the respiratory and circulatory systems, and musculoskeletal defects such as clubfoot, fused digits and extra digits. Many other health hazards have been identified and are listed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • Switching to organic foods helps you bypass all the concerns about processed food ingredients, chemical residues on conventionally-grown fresh produce, and the multi-layered hazards related to genetically engineered foods, whether fresh or processed, and is the easiest way to help protect the health of your family
  • Important action items include Cornucopia’s Say No to Dow AgroScience’s GE Corn Petition







http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...on-agent-orange.aspx?e_cid=20120311_SNL_Art_1

Do This - or You Could Soon be Eating an "Agent Orange" for Dinner


Posted By Dr. Mercola
March 11 2012
133,465 views



By Dr. Mercola

Mark Kastel, founder of the farm policy research group Cornucopia, is deeply dedicated to making sure we have high-quality food and that we're not being deceived about what we're eating.

Here, we discuss Agent Orange, and one of its active ingredients, which is now creeping into our food supply.

As described by Kastel, Cornucopia's mission is:

"To empower farmers, consumers, and wholesale buyers with information, so that they can make good, discerning purchasing decisions in the marketplace.

Among other things, we act as an organic industry watchdog to preserve the integrity and authenticity of the organic label and products to make sure that it remains to be a true marketplace alternative for people who want safer and more nutritious food."

Agent Orange Ingredient Headed Toward Your Plate?


To most people, "Agent Orange" is synonymous with the Vietnam war.

Many veterans suffered permanent side effects from their exposure to this potent defoliant, and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese children have been born with serious birth defects as a result of its use during the war.

Now, one of the active ingredients in Agent Orange, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), a broadleaf herbicide, may be introduced directly into our food supply, because weeds are becoming increasingly resistant to Monsanto's broad-spectrum herbicide Roundup, which is used in massive quantities on all genetically engineered Roundup Ready crops. It's estimated that more than 130 types of weeds spanning 40 U.S. states are now herbicide-resistant, and they're showing no signs of stopping. In fact, the situation is getting progressively worse.

"Agent Orange was an herbicide used to defoliate the jungles in Vietnam and South East Asia, which also include a myriad of other incredibly toxic chemicals that we know had profound deleterious effect on the health of the indigenous people who lived in South East Asia and to our veterans who served there," Kastel says. Now we see one of these ingredients, 2,4-D, introduced [into our food supply] because the Dow Company... is introducing a new genetically engineered corn plant that "will be resistant to 2,4-D."

Yes, Dow AgroSciences (a subsidiary of Dow Chemicals), which was one of the original manufacturers of Agent Orange, has developed a new generation of genetically modified (GM) crops called "Enlist", designed to resist not just one, but THREE different herbicides: glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup), glufosinate, and 2,4-D, in the same way that Monsanto's Roundup-Ready crops are resistant to glyphosate.

After a mere 15 years' worth of consistent use on Roundup Ready crops, vast areas are now overrun with glyphosate-resistant superweeds that can't be destroyed. What makes them think triple-resistant crops are going to be any better, or produce different end results?

Why "Agent Orange"-Resistant Crops are a BAD Idea

Interestingly enough, the use of 2,4-D is not new, as it is actually one of the most widely used herbicides in the world. What is new is that once staple crops like soy and corn that are engineered to be resistant to 2,4-D begin to flourish, the herbicide will be applied to U.S. farm land on an unprecedented scale -- not unlike its indiscriminate application during Vietnam.

There are also some other unanswered questions relating to this new breed of 2,4-D-resistant crops.

"The curious part about this – we had to do some research to understand, and I don't know if we fully understand it yet – is that corn is naturally resistant to 2,4-D, and that 2,4-D has been used as a corn herbicide, a post-emergent herbicide for decades," Kastel says.

"This is legal, perfectly legal; even though we know that there are profound negative impacts to human health, and that this chemical residue ends up in our food system, in our soil and water, and ends up creating serious occupational exposures and risks for the people who produce our food; it's still licensed by the EPA and approved for use by the USDA on our food crops.

The curious part is, if corn is already resistant to 2,4-D, why are they injecting that genetically engineered cultivar?

The answer seems to be that there might be some incremental level of benefit in that. Right now there are application windows, certain times during crop growth, that it would probably not kill the plant but stunt its growth. [With approval] the restrictions on the spraying will be relieved.

If this takes off—if Dow can convince agronomists, extension services, extension agents, universities (where they spend a lot of money), and farmers that this is a better seed with a potential for higher yields, we're going to see really large increases in the application of 2,4-D in our countryside."

Of course, the whole point of engineering resistance to an herbicide within a plant is so that you can "carpet bomb" an entire field, leaving only your GM crop standing. If 2,4-D resistant crops receive approval and eventually replace Monsanto's failing Roundup-resistant crops as Dow intends, it is likely that billions of pounds of 2,4-D will be needed, on top of the already insane levels of Roundup being used (1.6 billion lbs were used in 2007 in the US alone!).

2,4-D—Do You Really Want to Feed this to Your Kids?

Ironically, while Dow's new crops would seriously escalate the use of 2,4-D, Monsanto is currently facing a class-action lawsuit involving another Agent Orange ingredient: 2,4,5-Ti. The suit alleges that homes and schools near one of its 2,4,5-T chemical plants are now contaminated with cancer-causing dioxin, a byproduct of the manufacturing process.

This should be a wake-up call to those considering widespread application of any toxic Agent Orange ingredient.

And let's be clear. The EPA acknowledges that 2,4-D is far from a benign chemical.

Researchers have linked it to increased cancer risks, especially soft tissue sarcoma and malignant lymphoma. No less than four American studies have found an association between chlorophenoxy herbicide use (such as 2,4-D) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. EPA researchers have also discovered higher rates of birth defects in countries with high rates of 2,4-D application to farm fields. In fact, birth defects were 60 to 90 percent more likely in such countries, and birth defects were also found to peak in babies conceived in the spring, when fields were being sprayed the most. The most common birth defects included defects of the respiratory and circulatory systems, and musculoskeletal defects such as clubfoot, fused digits and extra digits.

If that's not bad enough, consider this EPA summary of 2,4-Dii:

"Health effects of chronic or acute 2,4-D exposure reported for adults included blood, liver, and kidney toxicity. Specific effects included a reduction in hemoglobin and red blood cell numbers, decreased liver enzyme activity, and increased kidney weight. Acute exposure can result in skin and eye irritation. Acute exposure to very high concentrations of 2,4-D can cause the following clinical symptoms: stupor; coma; coughing; burning sensations in lungs; loss of muscular coordination; nausea; vomiting; or dizziness.

Experimental animal studies of chronic oral exposure have reported adverse effects on the eye, thyroid, kidney, adrenals, adrenals, and ovaries/testes. In addition, some experimental animal studies have reported teratogenic effects (birth defects) at high doses, including increased fetal death, urinary tract malformation, and extra ribs.

When adult female experimental animals were exposed to 2,4-D during their pregnancy and lactation periods, their exposed offspring exhibited neurological effects, including delayed neurobehavioral development and changes in several neurotransmitter levels or binding activities and ganglioside levels in the brain. Delayed neurobehavioral development was manifested as delays in acquisition of certain motor skills such as the righting reflex."

The EASIEST Way to Protect the Health of Your Family...

So, what can you do to protect your health and the health of your family from the ever growing threats posed by genetically engineered foods and mounting herbicide use? Kastel says it well:

"Don't panic. Go organic."

Yes, it's getting increasingly difficult to keep tabs of what's being added to the food supply, and trying to keep track of everything to avoid can be a daunting task. It's much easier to simply switch to organic foods; bypassing all the concerns about processed food ingredients, chemical residues on conventionally-grown fresh produce, and the multi-layered hazards related to genetically engineered foods, whether fresh or processed.

By definition, foods that are certified organic must never intentionally use GM organisms, must be produced without artificial pesticides and fertilizers and come from an animal reared without the routine use of antibiotics, growth promoters or other drugs. Additionally, grass-fed beef will not have been fed GM corn feed, although now that GM alfalfa is approved, grass-fed will not always mean GMO free.

"There aren't that many things that we can totally take control over in terms of our health and our future health and the health of our offspring, but pure food and pure water is one of those," Kastel says.

"We know that there has been peer-reviewed research that indicates a demonstratively lower level of any kind of contamination in organic food... Peer-reviewed literature clearly illustrates its nutritional superiority. On a micro basis, we need to protect ourselves and our families. It really contributes to the richness and quality of life, because organic food tastes better. And in terms of an investment, what could be a better investment than the health and well-being of your family?

We should also become politically involved, because what's so insidious is that these novel genes permeate our environment. They can even contaminate organic food. We need to be activists."

Now's the Time to Take Action!

Cornucopia.org has a "Say No to Dow AgroScience's GE Corn Petition" on their website. Please sign this petition, which will automatically send a letter to USDA secretary Tom Vilsack and President Obama, voicing your concerns. Part of this petition also asks for labeling of genetically engineered foods.

"The industry is vehemently resisting that, because they know very well that given a choice – just like in Europe where they do have a choice because of mandatory labeling – consumers will not vote to subject their children to become, in essence, human guinea pigs, because there's been virtually no human health testing on any of these novel genetically mutated life forms," Kastel says.

Another Important Action Item: Support California's Ballot Initiative to Label GMO's!

In 2007, then-Presidential candidate Obama promised to "immediately" require GM labeling if elected. So far, nothing of the sort has transpired.

Fortunately, 24 US states have (as part of their state governance) something called the Initiative Process, where residents can bring to ballot any law they want enacted, as long as it has sufficient support. California has been busy organizing just such a ballot initiative to get mandatory labeling for genetically engineered foods sold in their state. The proposed law will be on the ballot for 2012.

Michigan and Washington are also starting similar campaigns.

Since California is the 8th largest economy in the world, a win for the California Initiative would be a huge step forward, and would affect ingredients and labeling nation-wide. A coalition of consumer, public health and environmental organizations, food companies, and individuals have submitted the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act to the State Attorney General. Now, they need 800,000 signatures to get the Act on this year's ballot.

I urge you to get involved and help in any way you can.

Regardless of whether you live in California or not, please donate to help support this Initiative and spread the word to everyone you know in California. Also remember to talk to organic producers and store managers and ask them to actively support the California Ballot. It may be the only chance we have to require the proper labeling of genetically engineered foods.

Be assured that what happens in California will affect the remainder of the US states, so please support this important state initiative, even if you do not live there!
 

NC Susan

Deceased
youtube video

While on the campaign trail in 2007, Barack Obama promised to label GMO foods if elected. Now's the time! Today, an estimated 80% of processed foods contain GMOs. Tell President Obama you agree that the U.S. needs GMO labeling "because Americans should know what they're buying".

For the past 20 years, Americans have been denied the right to know what's in their food. Help make this the Change We Can Believe In: action.fooddemocracynow.org/​sign/​label_gmos_now/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqaaB6NE1TI&feature=player_embedded
 
Mercola needs to spend some quality time in farm country.

First of all, Agent Orange was so toxic NOT because of 2, 4-D or even 2, 4, 5-T but because of the dioxin contamination of 2, 4, 5-T (it was a manufacturing problem). From what I've heard, most folks didn't pay too much attention to application rates, either.

2, 4-D really isn't used much in grain crops, and is not likely to be a major player. It has a fairly narrow application window--if the weeds get too far along, the chemical doesn't work well at all and it can stunt and damage even naturally resistant plants like grasses. The photosynthesis inhibitors are the biggies for post emergent broad leaf control. 2, 4-D's primary agronomic use is in rangeland and road ditches. It's MAJOR use is on home lawns. If anyone is serious about restricting the use of 2, 4-D, they need to go after suburban homeowners, not farmers.
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
Thank you, BK!!! Damn, I'm sick of the fact-light (and fact FREE) baloney that comes out of these propaganda mills!!!

Again, 2,4-D is one of the less toxic herbicides. We use it about once every 10 years, when buttercup- which is a TOXIC PLANT- takes over our permanent pastures to the point where the cattle have problems grazing the grass without getting mouthfuls of buttercup. The labels on 2,4-D are pretty mild compared to many other herbicides and pesticides. And using a fairly small amount every 10 years is FAR less damaging to the environment than plowing up the pastures, seeding them, using Roundup or something to kill all the weeds first, and then another, more toxic herbicide to suppress the weeds until the grasses and clover can get strong and large enough to thrive.

All those scare words in that article- they're due to ACUTE POISONING or chronic poisoning from 2,4-D. Those at risk are us farmers... not the end consumers. And as long as we don't drink the stuff, or take baths in it, it's relatively safe. For sure, it's NOT "Agent Orange".

Summerthyme
 
We have to use a little 2, 4-D occasionally on different spots around the place to control thistles (and wormwood, sourdock, burdock and cocklebur, lol). Most years, we only get 4 or 5 days in the spring and again in the fall when the weeds are good for spraying. More often than not, we miss the spray window altogether because of adverse weather.

I wouldn't mind seeing a fall-only restriction on residential use of broadleaf herbicides. That would eliminate so much collateral damage...
 

NC Susan

Deceased
so if we conclude that the professional farmers, ranchers and dairymen did not screw up the drinking water, the air, the ground water aquifiers using the defoliants and broad spectrum herbicides then we dont have to sound warnings to stop the continued unrestricted sales of the chemicals to anyone with cash

and we cant ask for sales restrictions and licensed requirements to ensure the correct doseage,

nor to stop the escalation of the Monsantos nor the Home Depot big box stores from selling toxins to the Saturday suburban gardeners which continue the pollution that is known to sterilize and make infertile, cause birth and neurological defects in the general public and continue to kill necessary insects, worms, migratory birds and the Monarch butterflies

All of this would be acceptable as collateral damage because the alternative medical doctors and scientists globally are raising the issues but not the local county Ag Dept.
 
Last edited:

Kent

Inactive
http://www.biofortified.org/2012/03/misuse-of-a-vietnam-era-tragedy/#more-8480

Misuse Of A Vietnam Era Tragedy
by Steve Savage

Mark Twain once said, “A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” There was a perfect example of that last month. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) spread the term, “Agent Orange Corn” for Dow AgroSciences’ new biotech corn hybrids that are working their way through the regulatory process. These hybrids have been modified to be more resistant to 2,4-D, an herbicide that was introduced in 1948. This is being cast as a return to the use of Agent Orange and that is completely untrue. There is a lot of interesting detail behind this, but the CFS moniker for the corn is a classic case of information twisting – twisting in a way that is intentionally misleading. The reason that the term “Agent Orange Corn” is inaccurate can be discovered in a 1-minute Wikipedia search, but this did not prevent a host of of bloggers, environmental and Organic organizations, and even “news outlets” from uncritically passing along the disinformation.
Agent Orange, a defoliant used in the Vietnam War, was made with two herbicides: 2,4-D (the one that the new corn tolerates), and 2,4,5-T. The 2,4,5-T was unknowingly contaminated with a dioxin, something that was only later recognized as a significant human safety issue. Yes, 2,4-D was part of Agent Orange, but it wasn’t what made Agent Orange a danger back in the 1960s. In fact, for decades, 2,4-D has continued to be one of the most widely used, safest herbicides in the world. It is registered in 70 countries, including those with very comprehensive and cautious regulators (Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Japan…). 2,4-D is a component of most consumer products for the control of weeds in lawns. It is used extensively in wheat. It can already be used on corn up to a certain growth stage. 2,4-D is NOT Agent Orange.
It’s Not The 1960s (that is a good thing!)

There was a very limited understanding of environmental toxicology in America in the early 1960s. The modern environmental movement was just beginning, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was not established until 1968. So during the early 1960s, terrible mistakes were made with Agent Orange that are completely unthinkable today. Since that time the scrutiny of new and old pesticides has become comprehensive. It would be virtually impossible for an Agent Orange-like mistake could occur today, but that is what CFS and its repeaters are implying.
Why is 2,4-D Still Around?

A great many of the pesticides that were in use in the early 1960s have long since been banned or progressively replaced with far, far safer alternatives. A few, like 2,4-D, have continued to pass safety standards as they have been intensively reviewed and re-reviewed over the decades of increasingly sophisticated analysis. 2,4-D has been scrutinized and challenged from both a toxicological and epidemiological perspective. In every round of risk assessment, the EPA and its outside experts have concluded that 2,4-D has meets the EPA’s, ever more cautious, standards.
Why Would Farmer’s Want This New Corn?

Farmers in the US and elsewhere have been moving increasingly towards the control of weeds with herbicides rather than with mechanical methods called “tillage.” This is actually an extremely good thing from an environmental point of view. Plowed and tilled soils are susceptible to erosion. Erosion carries not just sediments, but also fertilizers and pesticide residues into streams. The mechanical disturbance of soil degrades its properties over time so that it becomes less able to capture and store rain and less able to sequester nutrients. This sort of farming “worked” in many cases only because there was more “virgin land” to start plowing. Beginning in 1960, some farmers began to experiment with “no-till” farming methods on a commercial scale. One of the reasons they were able to do that was because herbicides like 2,4-D had become available. Since the development of herbicide tolerant crops in 1996, the rate of conversion to no-till farming has been accelerating. From an environmental point of view, expansion of no-till farming is highly desirable, especially if combined with some other key practices. For farmers to successfully implement no-till farming; however, there must be a range of effective herbicide options.
Resistant Weeds

When any one herbicide is used too much, some weeds can become resistant. As many experts predicted, this has begun to happen for glyphosate tolerance (Roundup Ready). The selection for herbicide tolerant weeds is not something new with biotech crops. It is a problem that has occurred many times, long before GMO crops. They key is to employ multiple options including herbicides with different “modes of action,” cultural methods like cover crops or planting date shifts, and in some cases the judicious use of tillage. Recently, some weed scientists have highlighted the need for more sophisticated and varied weed control strategies. The new corn and soybean types that are coming can be a part of that strategy if employed strategically. The alternative of returning to mainly mechanical weed control is not an acceptable scenario.


Groups like the Center For Food Safety have generated furor by shouting an intentionally sensational half-truth. Ironically, this has put them in the position of advocating against a tool farmers need for environmentally sustainable farming. This new corn, and the soybeans that will follow, are part of what will enable land-use efficient, low environmental footprint farming. They have nothing to do with a 50 year old defoliant. There is absolutely no doubt that the lessons from “Agent Orange” must be remembered. The innocent victims of Agent Orange deserve that heightened awareness. What they don’t deserve is to have their tragedy exploited in an irresponsible way.

The “Comment Period” at the USDA about this particular corn technology has been extended until April 27th. The CFS and its allies are mobilizing people to enter comments. There is a need for counter-balancing arguments from those that understand the importance of technology in agriculture. Here is where to comment (USDA BRS Comments) before the extended deadline of 4/27/12.

Steve Savage is an agricultural scientist (plant pathology) with >30 years of experience in agricultural technology. He has worked for Colorado State University, DuPont (fungicide development), Mycogen (biocontrol development), and for the past 13 years as an independent. He also has a little vineyard in his back yard near San Diego. http://appliedmythology.blogspot.com/2012/01/updated-listing-of-posts-by-steve.html
 
so if we conclude that the professional farmers, ranchers and dairymen did not screw up the drinking water, the air, the ground water aquifiers using the defoliants and broad spectrum herbicides then we dont have to sound warnings to stop the continued unrestricted sales of the chemicals to anyone with cash

and we cant ask for sales restrictions and licensed requirements to ensure the correct doseage,

nor to stop the escalation of the Monsantos nor the Home Depot big box stores from selling toxins to the Saturday suburban gardeners which continue the pollution that is known to sterilize and make infertile, cause birth and neurological defects in the general public and continue to kill necessary insects, worms, migratory birds and the Monarch butterflies

All of this would be acceptable as collateral damage because the alternative medical doctors and scientists globally are raising the issues but not the local county Ag Dept.


As long as alt.whatever people continue to post poorly written!, poorly researched!, poorly documented! misinformation! instead of facts, you will never get anywhere. Facts are your friend in the long run, even if they aren't as sensational! as the bullpoo.

And it sure would be nice if these folks would take some agronomy classes so they would actually know what they're talking about.
 

Y2kO

Inactive
The main points that Dr. Huber makes concern their research showing that crops growing in Roundup contaminated soils do not take up minerals from the soil, thus making them (and the animals that eat them) nutritionally deficient.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/10/dr-don-huber-interview-part-1.aspx
Dr Huber interview with Dr. Mercola

Huber: It‟s been demonstrated that you reduce the uptake and efficiency of iron by 50 percent of manganese that‟s critical for liver function and immune response by 80 percent. But then if you look at the translocation from roots to shoot, you also have a reduction in zinc and all three of those critical elements of 80 to 90 percent. Greatly compromised is the nutritional efficiency, as well as the ability of that plant to accumulate and to store those nutrients not only for its own use, but also for us and for our animal's nutrition in that process.
 
Top