CORONA Risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

[marymonde]

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease


Abstract
Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease - PubMed

The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[blackjeep]

I think this is connected to or relates to animal testing, where after getting the magic vaccine, ALL the animals died after being exposed to covid or a similar virus.
Bottom line: future exposure to viruses after being vaccinated means severe illness or death.
I know people that have gladly taken this experimental nightmare vaccine.

 

[Bubble Head]

In a desperate attempt to be looked at as a nice person I have given my vaccine position up to a democrap. I will now move to the back of the line.

 

[Meadowlark]

Translated, get the vaccine at your own risk.

 

[Troke]

And there are lots of reports of vaccinated people getting Covid and ending up more badly than if they had not had the vaccine? We should be hearing gobs of stories by now.

 

[bw]

In a desperate attempt to be looked at as a nice person I have given my vaccine position up to a democrap. I will now move to the back of the line.

You're not fooling anyone, you vile excuse for a human being.











I'll be behind you, thanks.

 

[BassMan]

I think the "jury is still out" on the OP. Not that this does not bear watching.

Also wondering if the mRNA is really "out of your system" in 2 days, or if there are permanent changes (not including the learned behavior of the immune system).

 

[bw]

wondering if the mRNA is really "out of your system" in 2 days

No way in hell. I think in three to six months we're going to start seeing what the drug companies would have understood if they had done proper testing. The opportunities for disaster start ramping up at the end of nine months, if you get my drift. This is the new Thalidomide.

 

[blackjeep]

if the mRNA is really "out of your system" in 2 days, or if there are permanent changes

The magic vaccine reprograms your DNA, it's NOT out of your system after 2 days.
YOU become a genetically modified organism. Nice, huh?
The studies showing the adverse side effects have been hidden, almost entirely, but they are out there if you look.

 

[bw]

Does anyone know if ANY pregnancy has carried to term under this vax regime?

 

[amazon]

I thought it is not being given to pregnant women and children at this time.

 

[bw]

I thought it is not being given to pregnant women and children at this time.

If that's the case, then we have to wait for vaxxed women to get pregnant and deliver before we know how bad it can get. Any woman of or below childbearing age who takes this is simply not thinking.

 

[amazon]

Vaccination Considerations for People Pregnant or Breastfeeding

Learn about COVID-19 vaccination if pregnant or breastfeeding.

www.cdc.gov

CDC info re: pregnancy

 

[bw]

CDC info re: pregnancy

Thanks for that. I don't trust the CDC as far as I can comfortably spit a rat. Given that they're putting this many caveats in the brochure suggests they are doing CYA and don't have a freaking clue. What a crapshoot.

Whatever goes sour, the government always does its best to hide it. So unless we have a massive uptick in miscarriages and/or monsters, we won't know the effect until about a year from now. By then their goal is to have the entire population vaxxed.

Any language from the CDC that they're considering modifying the regime, selecting victims using new protocols, or altering the recipe, should be a red flag that the cat is leaving the bag.

 

[BassMan]

The magic vaccine reprograms your DNA, it's NOT out of your system after 2 days.
YOU become a genetically modified organism. Nice, huh?
The studies showing the adverse side effects have been hidden, almost entirely, but they are out there if you look.

Strictly speaking, the mRNA goes into the ribosomes, which are outside the nucleus where the DNA resides.

It is all quite complex, though, so I do not rule-out side-effects.

 

[Delta]

I have to laugh (scoff) at the concept of "informed consent". In my experience doctors have no interest in providing the information necessary for one to give informed consent. They want to make your healthcare decisions for you, and they do not want any discussion of negative side effects to get in the way. I once had a surgeon try to get me to have a particular surgery. I had second thoughts and backed out. Later he admitted to me that he didn't do those anymore. Thanks doc.

 

[Night Breeze]

Wait till all the military are vaccinated and see if any of them give informed consent.

 

[dstraito]

Translated, get the vaccine at your own risk.

That makes me feel better since the pharm companies have no liability!

 

[Profit of Doom]

No way in hell. I think in three to six months we're going to start seeing what the drug companies would have understood if they had done proper testing. The opportunities for disaster start ramping up at the end of nine months, if you get my drift. This is the new Thalidomide.

I believe we have heard of warnings concerning pregnancy.

 

[marymonde]

 

[Countrymouse]

Strictly speaking, the mRNA goes into the ribosomes, which are outside the nucleus where the DNA resides.

It is all quite complex, though, so I do not rule-out side-effects.

The Ribosomes manufacture ALL the proteins that make up our bodies---so yes this is a transformation of our body by transforming our very tissues.

 

[bw]

I believe we have heard of warnings concerning pregnancy.

My point was that unpregnant girls and women are going to be getting this too. We are going to see what this vax does to pregnant women as the women move through the pipeline, as it were. Their concern for pregnant women is specious at best.

 

[marymonde]

The Ribosomes manufacture ALL the proteins that make up our bodies---so yes this is a transformation of our body by transforming our very tissues.

I have wondered what it will do to a vaccinated woman who becomes pregnant. What will be passsed on to the child?

 

[bev]

View attachment 246534

From what I’ve read so far, the vaccines were also not tested on those with cancer currently or who have previously been treated for cancer. The responses from their doctors when asked if/when they should receive the vaccine have been all over the place.

Sure, you can get it right away.

Not for 30 days after treatment.

Not for 90 days after treatment.

I don’t know.

 

[Mary Contrary]

I have to laugh (scoff) at the concept of "informed consent". In my experience doctors have no interest in providing the information necessary for one to give informed consent. They want to make your healthcare decisions for you, and they do not want any discussion of negative side effects to get in the way. I once had a surgeon try to get me to have a particular surgery. I had second thoughts and backed out. Later he admitted to me that he didn't do those anymore. Thanks doc.

A few years ago my doctor wanted me to do a colonoscopy exam and i said no. He then fired me. I found another better one.

 

[Mary Contrary]

I have wondered what it will do to a vaccinated woman who becomes pregnant. What will be passsed on to the child?

I have read that the changed DNA WILL be passed onto the next generation.