GOV/MIL Reputation Intelligence

[davidinthewilderness]

Oh boy, oh joy! There is a new intelligence partner on the block. It's called Reputation Intelligence. How effective are you at effectuating change? Do your words inspire or do people just shrug their shoulders and go on with their lives? Are you a danger?

Here is an example: http://www.steprep.com/mentions/details/0e4b482bd6e6ba4343291ad888072537/

From the trenches of liberty,
Celeste

 

[Dobbin]

To those that click... you'll see the following...

These concepts were accessed in June 2009 from the US Army and adapted ...

Link
http://www.nonaiswa.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/img_1229.jpg
Created
Feb. 02, 2012
Found
Feb. 02, 2012
Source
nonaiswa.org
Sentiment Score
0.0
Likert Score
3
Category
Business
Keywords
"Celeste Bishop"

Sentiment Analysis

Neutral

So we're being evaluated? This is only if you're associated with a website, right?

Joe

 

[davidinthewilderness]

Joe,

Yes, this was through my website, BUT sigh, every person's reputation is being evaluated. They need to determine real time, all the time how big a threat you are. It looks to be the kick off for this new intelligence gathering. Now that they have codified the gathering of all your personal information, emails, phone, health, taxes, financial.... it will constantly be undated and filtered through this system. So once safe, not always safe.

I keep hearing Ross Perot's, "Do you hear the giant sucking sound?" I know he was referring to other things but it applies to this now. The good news is being aware is half the battle.

From the trenches of liberty,

Celeste

 

[Dobbin]

I can't wait to see my report card. There is a report card isn't there? You got yours (I guess.) Or at least the website got one.

Would Freedom of Information Act have any pull on this?

Oh. I'm getting it now. Go to http://www.steprep.com/ and you can see what ANYONE has to say about you - or more properly your web site/business. You just happened to be tagged by the US Army. Celeste, have you done business with the US Army? Otherwise why would they rate you?

Joe

 

[davidinthewilderness]

I am a FOIA darling but sadly it would be under National Security. At least until such time as they want you to know your threat score. Then you will probably see it on all the major networks. I know that my post on the coming data siege was long, but did you see in it that the regulations says they are going to post NON-COMPLIANT people on the web?

The answer to your question is yes and no. I have done quite a few exposes on the Army which is why I got rated. I used to work for the two most hated agencies, well maybe three, a whistle-blower. I said NO to being an active partner in what you all are seeing unfold before you now, and what is yet to come. It cost everything but I can live with myself. You can either hide or oppose evil. After prayer I was lead to oppose evil which is what I do. All that training, by the best of the best, is aimed at them and has been for years.


From the trenches of liberty (the signature line of my grandfather who fought and wrote during WW1),
Celeste

 

[marsh]

I am sure I have a file. I have been writing columns, submitting public comment, lobbying and participating in political coalitions for more than 20 years. However, I have been appointed to several federal commissions by several Secretaries of Ag, which required vetting, so one must really have to be extreme to be tagged.

(My advocacy has been for protection of property rights and natural resource/conservation policies.)

 

[mzkitty]

I've been a combination of "underground"/out in the open for about 3 decades. I don't know and I don't care what TPTB thinks of me, if they think of me at all. All they got is whatever I've posted on different websites over the years, so if they do monitor those places, including here, they know they can all shove it.

 

[Dobbin]

I probably have a file. Don't beings with nuclear security clearance have a file? (My badge at Port St. Lucie is currently "inactive" but could be brought back with 8 hours of audio/visual training and a computer test.)

The security review was extensive. Including 2nd degree of separation recommendation technique. (They interview the reference your reference recommends.) I was a little concerned about the specie issue.

Joe