davidinthewilderness
Inactive
The Executive Branch has been chiseling away at our Constitution and Bill of Rights in plain view of we the people and with little opposition. A series of Executive Orders is being issued to suspend our Constitutional form of government and replace it with a Fascist tyrannical empire.
A few years back I attended a small farmers convention. A keynote speaker got up and did a sales pitch asking the audience, "Wouldn't it be so much easier to manage large parcels of land rather than lots and small acreage?" The small farmers affirmed yes. It would be easier to manage just one large parcel of land, like the whole United States, rather than have individual land ownership. Ding, ding, ding...communism with a touch of Fascism because companies own the government now. And so we have gone down the slippery slope falling for the same sweet semantic lies that occurred in the Garden of Eden.
Remember Slick Willy? Well, we have Slick Willy II in office right now. Here is the most recent example:
May 10, 2012
Section 1. Policy. Regulations play an indispensable role in protecting public health, welfare, safety,(this is called an EMERGENCY CLAUSE-IT SUSPENDS THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM) and our environment(we have bound ourselves to environmental treaties), but they can also impose significant burdens and costs. During challenging economic times, we should be especially careful not to impose unjustified regulatory requirements. For this reason, it is particularly important for agencies to conduct retrospective analyses of existing rules to examine whether they remain justified and whether they should be modified or streamlined (TRANSLATES: WE ARE GOING TO ELIMINATE THE OLD STANDARD OF REGULATION AND EMBRACE GLOBAL FASCISM) in light of changed circumstances, including the rise of new technologies.
Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system "must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements." To promote this goal, that Executive Order requires agencies not merely to conduct a single exercise, but to engage in "periodic review of existing significant regulations." Pursuant to section 6(b) of that Executive Order, agencies are required to develop retrospective review plans to review existing significant regulations in order to "determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed."(TRANSLATES WE ARE GOING TO ELIMINATE THE OLD STANDARD OF REGULATION AND EMBRACE GLOBAL FASCISM) The purpose of this requirement is to "make the agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives."
In response to Executive Order 13563, agencies have developed and made available for public comment retrospective review plans that identify over five hundred initiatives.(SUN YZU- ART OF WAR-GET YOUR ENEMIES TO SPEND TIME DOING USELESS THINGS LIKE REWRITE OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT) A small fraction of those initiatives, already finalized or formally proposed to the public, are anticipated to eliminate billions of dollars in regulatory costs and tens of millions of hours in annual paperwork burdens. Significantly larger savings are anticipated as the plans are implemented and as action is taken on additional initiatives.
As a matter of longstanding practice and to satisfy statutory obligations, many agencies engaged in periodic review of existing regulations prior to the issuance of Executive Order 13563. But further steps should be taken, consistent with (WHITE HOUSE ACKNOWLEDGES INTERNATIONAL LAW) law, agency resources, and regulatory priorities, to promote public participation in retrospective review, to modernize our regulatory system, and to institutionalize regular assessment of significant regulations.
Sec. 2. Public Participation in Retrospective Review. Members of the public, including those directly and indirectly affected by regulations, as well as State, local, and tribal governments, have important information about the actual effects of existing regulations. For this reason, and consistent with Executive Order 13563, agencies shall invite, on a regular basis (to be determined by the agency head in consultation with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)), public suggestions about regulations in need of retrospective review and about appropriate modifications to such regulations. To promote an open exchange of information, retrospective analyses of regulations, including supporting data, shall be released to the public online wherever practicable (WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS THAT THEY WILL ALLOW YOU TO COMMENT ON THE REGULATIONS THAT THEY TURN OVER INTERNATIONAL CONTROL BUT THEY WILL RAM IT THROUGH ANYWAY, NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY. THEY ARE CLAIMING THAT YOU CAN COMMENT BUT WHAT IT IS SAYING IS THAT IF IT IS "PRACTICAL-CONVENIENT" THEY WILL PUT IT ONLINE. WITH GOV BEING ALL ELECTRONIC IF THEY DO NOT POST IT ONLINE YOU HAVE NO COMMENT)
Sec. 3. Setting Priorities. In implementing and improving their retrospective review plans, and in considering retrospective review suggestions from the public, agencies shall give priority, consistent with law, to those initiatives that will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork burdens while protecting (public health, welfare, safety,( REMEMBER THIS IS THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND IT SUSPENDS OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM) and our environment (SUBMIT TO INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TREATIES-HOW CONVENIENT JUST BEFORE RIO+). To the extent practicable and permitted by law, agencies shall also give special consideration to initiatives that would reduce unjustified regulatory burdens or simplify or harmonize (SIMPLIFY AND HARMONIZE TO INTERNATIONAL LAW) regulatory requirements imposed on small businesses. Consistent with Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), agencies shall give consideration to the cumulative effects of their own regulations, including cumulative burdens, and shall to the extent practicable and consistent with law give priority to reforms that would make significant progress in reducing those burdens while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment.(REMEMBER THIS IS THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND WHICH SUSPENDS OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM)
The Agencies are all on board eliminating chunks of our Constitutional Republic with a push of the delete button. Why do you think that they stopped printing laws and regulations? So they could do as they did with our vote, delete what they didn't want.
I am dealing with this particular issue in Agriculture as they are deleting vast amounts of regulation that refers back to the rule of law, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.
God help us though we don't deserve it,
Celeste
A few years back I attended a small farmers convention. A keynote speaker got up and did a sales pitch asking the audience, "Wouldn't it be so much easier to manage large parcels of land rather than lots and small acreage?" The small farmers affirmed yes. It would be easier to manage just one large parcel of land, like the whole United States, rather than have individual land ownership. Ding, ding, ding...communism with a touch of Fascism because companies own the government now. And so we have gone down the slippery slope falling for the same sweet semantic lies that occurred in the Garden of Eden.
Remember Slick Willy? Well, we have Slick Willy II in office right now. Here is the most recent example:
May 10, 2012
Executive Order -- Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
IDENTIFYING AND REDUCING REGULATORY BURDENS
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to modernize our regulatory system and to reduce unjustified regulatory burdens and costs, it is hereby ordered as follows:EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
IDENTIFYING AND REDUCING REGULATORY BURDENS
Section 1. Policy. Regulations play an indispensable role in protecting public health, welfare, safety,(this is called an EMERGENCY CLAUSE-IT SUSPENDS THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM) and our environment(we have bound ourselves to environmental treaties), but they can also impose significant burdens and costs. During challenging economic times, we should be especially careful not to impose unjustified regulatory requirements. For this reason, it is particularly important for agencies to conduct retrospective analyses of existing rules to examine whether they remain justified and whether they should be modified or streamlined (TRANSLATES: WE ARE GOING TO ELIMINATE THE OLD STANDARD OF REGULATION AND EMBRACE GLOBAL FASCISM) in light of changed circumstances, including the rise of new technologies.
Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), states that our regulatory system "must measure, and seek to improve, the actual results of regulatory requirements." To promote this goal, that Executive Order requires agencies not merely to conduct a single exercise, but to engage in "periodic review of existing significant regulations." Pursuant to section 6(b) of that Executive Order, agencies are required to develop retrospective review plans to review existing significant regulations in order to "determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed."(TRANSLATES WE ARE GOING TO ELIMINATE THE OLD STANDARD OF REGULATION AND EMBRACE GLOBAL FASCISM) The purpose of this requirement is to "make the agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives."
In response to Executive Order 13563, agencies have developed and made available for public comment retrospective review plans that identify over five hundred initiatives.(SUN YZU- ART OF WAR-GET YOUR ENEMIES TO SPEND TIME DOING USELESS THINGS LIKE REWRITE OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT) A small fraction of those initiatives, already finalized or formally proposed to the public, are anticipated to eliminate billions of dollars in regulatory costs and tens of millions of hours in annual paperwork burdens. Significantly larger savings are anticipated as the plans are implemented and as action is taken on additional initiatives.
As a matter of longstanding practice and to satisfy statutory obligations, many agencies engaged in periodic review of existing regulations prior to the issuance of Executive Order 13563. But further steps should be taken, consistent with (WHITE HOUSE ACKNOWLEDGES INTERNATIONAL LAW) law, agency resources, and regulatory priorities, to promote public participation in retrospective review, to modernize our regulatory system, and to institutionalize regular assessment of significant regulations.
Sec. 2. Public Participation in Retrospective Review. Members of the public, including those directly and indirectly affected by regulations, as well as State, local, and tribal governments, have important information about the actual effects of existing regulations. For this reason, and consistent with Executive Order 13563, agencies shall invite, on a regular basis (to be determined by the agency head in consultation with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)), public suggestions about regulations in need of retrospective review and about appropriate modifications to such regulations. To promote an open exchange of information, retrospective analyses of regulations, including supporting data, shall be released to the public online wherever practicable (WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS THAT THEY WILL ALLOW YOU TO COMMENT ON THE REGULATIONS THAT THEY TURN OVER INTERNATIONAL CONTROL BUT THEY WILL RAM IT THROUGH ANYWAY, NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY. THEY ARE CLAIMING THAT YOU CAN COMMENT BUT WHAT IT IS SAYING IS THAT IF IT IS "PRACTICAL-CONVENIENT" THEY WILL PUT IT ONLINE. WITH GOV BEING ALL ELECTRONIC IF THEY DO NOT POST IT ONLINE YOU HAVE NO COMMENT)
Sec. 3. Setting Priorities. In implementing and improving their retrospective review plans, and in considering retrospective review suggestions from the public, agencies shall give priority, consistent with law, to those initiatives that will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant quantifiable reductions in paperwork burdens while protecting (public health, welfare, safety,( REMEMBER THIS IS THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND IT SUSPENDS OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM) and our environment (SUBMIT TO INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TREATIES-HOW CONVENIENT JUST BEFORE RIO+). To the extent practicable and permitted by law, agencies shall also give special consideration to initiatives that would reduce unjustified regulatory burdens or simplify or harmonize (SIMPLIFY AND HARMONIZE TO INTERNATIONAL LAW) regulatory requirements imposed on small businesses. Consistent with Executive Order 13563 and Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), agencies shall give consideration to the cumulative effects of their own regulations, including cumulative burdens, and shall to the extent practicable and consistent with law give priority to reforms that would make significant progress in reducing those burdens while protecting public health, welfare, safety, and our environment.(REMEMBER THIS IS THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND WHICH SUSPENDS OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLES RIGHT TO REFERENDUM)
The Agencies are all on board eliminating chunks of our Constitutional Republic with a push of the delete button. Why do you think that they stopped printing laws and regulations? So they could do as they did with our vote, delete what they didn't want.
I am dealing with this particular issue in Agriculture as they are deleting vast amounts of regulation that refers back to the rule of law, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.
God help us though we don't deserve it,
Celeste
