ALERT Ransomware Group Claims to Have Hacked Ring Security Camera Data

medic38572

TB Fanatic
by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D. March 16, 2023

1679190288255.png

Technological terrorists claim to have seized the data from Amazon’s popular “Ring” smart doorbell and surveillance devices and are threatening to release that data over the internet unless Amazon meets their demands.


As reported by Vice:


“There’s always an option to let us leak your data,” a message posted on the ransomware group’s website reads next to Ring’s logo. The ransomware group claiming responsibility for the attack is ALPHV, whose malware is known as BlackCat.
Like other ransomware groups, ALPHV goes beyond just locking a victim’s files, and has a website where it names and shames its victims in an attempt to extort them. If those targets don’t pay, ALPHV threatens to publicly release data stolen from them. ALPHV’s site stands out in that the section of its site which publishes hacked data, called “Collections,” is easier to search than some other hacking group’s sites.

ALPHV has a history of such attacks, having previously released medical data, as well as data hacked from a hotel chain.


For those readers unfamiliar with the term, ransomware is a type of malicious software (malware) that encrypts a victim’s files or computer system and demands payment, usually in the form of cryptocurrency, in exchange for the decryption key. Ransomware typically spreads through email attachments, infected software downloads, or vulnerabilities in a computer system’s security. Once the ransomware has infected a victim’s system, it can quickly spread to other connected devices or networks. The attackers behind the ransomware will then demand payment in exchange for restoring access to the victim’s files or system. Ransomware attacks can be devastating, as they can result in the loss of important data or the disruption of critical systems.


In this case, the ALPHV group reports that it has seized control of the data from Ring cameras and that if Amazon doesn’t accede to their terms, then ALPHV will release the Ring camera data on the internet, putting the video and audio data of millions within the reach of anyone with access to a computer.


For its part, Ring claims that it’s seen no evidence that customer data have been compromised. Ring admits, however, that a third-party vendor has been the victim of a ransomware account and that Ring/Amazon is working with that company to minimize the damage. Ring insists that the third-party vendor has no access to customer data.




Regardless of such reassurances, this isn’t the first time data from Ring cameras have suffered serious security breaches.


In 2020, an Amazon software engineer called for the shutdown of Ring, explaining that the service is incompatible with privacy.


Max Eliaser, the Amazon employee insisting that the connected Ring doorbells and cameras should be shelved, posted an explanation on Medium. “The deployment of connected home security cameras that allow footage to be queried centrally are simply not compatible with a free society. The privacy issues are not fixable with regulation and there is no balance that can be struck. Ring should be shut down immediately and not brought back,” he wrote.


Eliaser isn’t alone in raising a warning voice about the potential threats to privacy posed by the popular doorbell camera. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) published a report revealing substantial breaches to the privacy of users of the Amazon-owned “smart” technology. EFF’s report showed the smart device is a lot savvier than users likely realize:


Ring doorbell app for Android found it to be packed with third-party trackers sending out a plethora of customers’ personally identifiable information (PII). Four main analytics and marketing companies were discovered to be receiving information such as the names, private IP addresses, mobile network carriers, persistent identifiers, and sensor data on the devices of paying customers.

While Amazon does not publish sales numbers, industry insiders estimate that the online retailer has sold over 1.7 million units of the Ring devices, which is more than its next four competitors combined.


Thus the hacking and holding of customer data by a ransomware group proven in the past to follow through on their threats to release personal data on the internet is particularly alarming.


Believe it or not, Ring cameras have had other very serious security shortcomings exposed recently.


Regarding the Ring doorbell app, an EFF investigation disclosed that a shocking amount of personal data is shared with third-party companies without notice to the user:


AppsFlyer, a big data company focused on the mobile platform, is given a wide array of information upon app launch as well as certain user actions, such as interacting with the “Neighbors” section of the app. This information includes your mobile carrier, when Ring was installed and first launched, a number of unique identifiers, the app you installed from, and whether AppsFlyer tracking came preinstalled on the device. This last bit of information is presumably to determine whether AppsFlyer tracking was included as bloatware on a low-end Android device.
Most alarmingly, AppsFlyer also receives the sensors installed on your device (on our test device, this included the magnetometer, gyroscope, and accelerometer) and current calibration settings.

As unbelievable as that relationship is, AppsFlyer is not the biggest benefactor of Ring’s data sharing scheme.


More from EFF’s report:


Ring gives MixPanel the most information by far. Users’ full names, email addresses, device information such as OS version and model, whether bluetooth is enabled, and app settings such as the number of locations a user has Ring devices installed in, are all collected and reported to MixPanel. MixPanel is briefly mentioned in Ring’s list of third party services, but the extent of their data collection is not.
What makes this data-sharing arrangement even more menacing is that the method of encryption used by Amazon makes it difficult for someone trying to detect the presence of the programs that gather and send the data. Security companies or researchers that might be looking for such security breaches would find these barricades, impediments that would likely discourage digging any deeper.

Beyond the app-based breach of privacy, the Ring devices create situations where surveillance can be conducted on people who don’t have the service and who cannot keep themselves from being watched by those who do.


Amazon’s Ring home security service has entered into contracts with over 200 police departments, and the tech giant admits to giving law enforcement expansive access to the video and audio collected by the service’s surveillance devices, without the permission of the customer!


A visit to Amazon’s Ring Security System’s product page reveals to possible customers — and those worried about personal privacy — all the data that Amazon is making available, without prior permission or notice of Ring customers, to police departments:


• Monitor your property in HD video, and check-in on home at any time with Live View on-demand video and audio.


• Hear and speak to people on your property from your mobile device with the built-in microphone and speakers.


• Activate the siren from your phone, tablet, and PC to scare away any suspicious people caught on camera.


So, is this the data that ALPHV has and is threatening to release? No one knows and they aren’t saying.


But the more relevant question is, will all these security breaches and data hacks convince anyone to think twice about allowing Amazon access to their home?


A cybersecurity company has verified independently that the ALPHV collective does list Ring data among the data it currently has in its database.

 

mistaken1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This is far more concerning.

Max Eliaser, the Amazon employee insisting that the connected Ring doorbells and cameras should be shelved, posted an explanation on Medium. “The deployment of connected home security cameras that allow footage to be queried centrally are simply not compatible with a free society. The privacy issues are not fixable with regulation and there is no balance that can be struck. Ring should be shut down immediately and not brought back,” he wrote.

Anything you put in 'the cloud' no longer belongs to you.
 

Squib

Veteran Member
Most of us wouldn’t really care…but that’s because we’re normal folk, but…

Imagine the countless husbands/wives, etc being able to find out every midnight rendezvous and drug deal going on in real time or in the past!?

Again, we don’t care, but to many people, their marriages, freedom, and safety would be gone.

Also, imagine pedos and stalkers beating their meat watching your kids and grand kids at home…sorry for the blunt language ladies (and sophisticated men!)

So yeah, we don’t care, but wicked people will always find a way to use info against you…case your house, daily routine or whatever for their benefit and your harm.
 

9idrr

Veteran Member
Folks wanna play with IOT stuff, it's on them. Do we know that everybody has protected/isolated their systems so the script kiddies don't have back doors into the rest of one's data? Even if'n you don't use the Ring gadget, how about a nanny cam or smart refrigerator? IIRC, there were articles about RC sex toys that even tracked customers' use, although the company claimed any info obtained was anonymous. Sure.
 

Bubble Head

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Got hit with Ransomeware a few weeks back. It was a mess. Don’t know how they got in but they couldn’t get data out since my protection stopped the flow. It did lock up that computer and I had a friend who works this problem at very high levels unwrap it for me. Still restoring the data. You have to be careful not to put fractured data back in. So far nothing lost and a lot learned. I was lucky but disabled on my main computer.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
If these "hackers" want to post videos of the squirrels running around my yard on the internet they're welcome to do so. It does not affect me or the squirrels in the least.
And when the FBI shows up at your door with a warrant to find out why the camera showed you had a conservative political candidate at your door, or those dastardly church people, or anyone else Big Brother deems undesirable at or thru your door?
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
This is far more concerning.

Anything you put in 'the cloud' no longer belongs to you.
Memphis the Sewer Trap has a program to link as many security cameras as possible into a system feeding a DBF accessible to local LEAs.

My wife thought it might be a good idea but then we talked. Her opinion now is "it would be a good idea IF . . . . . "
 
Last edited:

PrairieMoon

Veteran Member
Got hit with Ransomeware a few weeks back. It was a mess. Don’t know how they got in but they couldn’t get data out since my protection stopped the flow. It did lock up that computer and I had a friend who works this problem at very high levels unwrap it for me. Still restoring the data. You have to be careful not to put fractured data back in. So far nothing lost and a lot learned. I was lucky but disabled on my main computer.

I'm curious...how did you know? What was your first sign?
 

bluelady

Veteran Member
"Beyond the app-based breach of privacy, the Ring devices create situations where surveillance can be conducted on people who don’t have the service and who cannot keep themselves from being watched by those who do."

Is this referring to neighbors within range of someone else's camera?

It's already too late for anyone who doesn't live in the woods like a hermit. Still very creepy.
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
If you’re using a ring doorbell you should have end to end encryption enabled.
Locks only keep the honest humans out.

The lock is yet to be invented which can't be defeated EVENTUALLY.

What keeps your objects inside secure is the "money value of time" necessary to defeat the lock. If it costs the thief more in time (equates to "$") than the objects stolen then they (usually) won't bother.

Thievery is much like ANY human occupation. If it doesn't pay well then most don't do it.

Not to say that there are not those whose time is only exceeded in value by the pleasure derived in successful defeat of opposition.


The locks produced by his company were famed for their resistance to lock picking and tampering, and the company famously had a "challenge lock" displayed in the window of their London shop from 1790, mounted on a board containing the inscription:

The artist who can make an instrument that will pick or open this lock shall receive 200 guineas the moment it is produced.[2][3]



The Great Exhibition 1851

The challenge stood for over 67 years until, at the Great Exhibition of 1851, the American locksmith Alfred Charles Hobbs was able to open the lock and, following some argument about the circumstances under which he had opened it, was awarded the prize. Hobbs' attempt required about 51 hours, spread over 16 days.[4]

The Challenge Lock is in the Science Museum in London. An examination of the lock shows that it has been rebuilt since Hobbs picked it. Originally it had 18 iron slides and 1 central spring; it now has 13 steel slides, each with its own spring.[5]


Dobbin
 

Repairman-Jack

Veteran Member
Locks only keep the honest humans out.

The lock is yet to be invented which can't be defeated EVENTUALLY.

What keeps your objects inside secure is the "money value of time" necessary to defeat the lock. If it costs the thief more in time (equates to "$") than the objects stolen then they (usually) won't bother.

Thievery is much like ANY human occupation. If it doesn't pay well then most don't do it.

Not to say that there are not those whose time is only exceeded in value by the pleasure derived in successful defeat of opposition.





Dobbin
Lol..so don’t use encryption because at some point it can be cracked?

Sorry poor example and just plain bad advice.
 

Lone_Hawk

Resident Spook
I have a ring doorbell and a solar powered camera on the back facing the shop. I got them fully aware that what images were captured were not private. As long as you understand the risks, then you can make a decision. Ring purges all video over 30 days old. So if someone wants to watch the finch that likes to sit on my front storm door handle, or the dogs going out back to potty, knock themselves out.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
I don't think I was giving advice on locks OR encryption. Just pointing out the "real life" aspects.

And a concept that MANY overlook. Possibly even me.

I don't do encryption, and my gate has no lock.

I can open it readily. With my mouth. It must be my "finesse."

Owner struggles somehow with it.

Go figure.

Dobbin
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
And when the FBI shows up at your door with a warrant to find out why the camera showed you had a conservative political candidate at your door, or those dastardly church people, or anyone else Big Brother deems undesirable at or thru your door?
Then you have a decision to make.
 

Squib

Veteran Member
IIRC, there were articles about RC sex toys that even tracked customers' use, although the company claimed any info obtained was anonymous. Sure.

:eek:
Yikes! That’s like those who think being a gynecologist would be fun…almost always the view is terrible!
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
What is this “encryption” being bandied about on this thread? The only encryption you have control over is your wifi network encryption, and that does nothing in this case, because the theft was at the company server level. And anyone running a wifi network without encryption gets exactly what they deserve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Blue 5

Veteran Member
And when the FBI shows up at your door with a warrant to find out why the camera showed you had a conservative political candidate at your door, or those dastardly church people, or anyone else Big Brother deems undesirable at or thru your door?
By the time those sorts of things begin to happen, the "aggressive negotiation" phase of restoring the Republic will already be well underway. They would probably be much too occupied with other, more aggressive negotiators than this broken down old veteran.
 

Repairman-Jack

Veteran Member
What is this “encryption” being bandied about on this thread? The only encryption you have control over is your wifi network encryption, and that does nothing in this case, because the theft was at the company server level. And anyone running a wifi network without encryption gets exactly what they deserve.
Ring cameras now (well since 2022) have an option to enable end to end encryption (AES128) on video and audio files from your ring doorbell. While this doesn't stop the theft from the cloud provider...user files would "useless" to thieves.

Do I believe that Amazon can't "decrypt" the data <shrug>.

For me this article just reinforces my decision to not put my cctv in the cloud/open to the internet or use cameras from the security/alarm provider.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
What is this “encryption” being bandied about on this thread? The only encryption you have control over is your wifi network encryption, and that does nothing in this case, because the theft was at the company server level. And anyone running a wifi network without encryption gets exactly what they deserve.
If you enable E2E encryption on the Ring camera, it remains encrypted “at rest” on the Ring servers, thus a hacker would only be able to grab an encrypted video rather than a wide-open playable video from the server.
 

Repairman-Jack

Veteran Member
So it should be set to ON by default then.

I bought my doorbell long before 2022.
Originally it was an opt-in feature.

https://support.ring.com/hc/en-us/a...w-to-Set-Up-Video-End-to-End-Encryption-E2EE-

How to Set Up Video End-to-End Encryption (E2EE)​

Setting up your device in the Ring app for Video End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) is a multi-step process. Follow the instructions below carefully.

Step 1 - Make sure you have the latest version of the Ring app.

Step 2 - Go to Control Center in the Ring app.

  1. Tap Video Encryption
  2. Tap Advanced Settings
  3. Tap Video End-to-End Encryption
Step 3 - Video Encryption setup

  1. Tap Get Started
  2. Follow the in-app instructions to enroll your account in Video End-To-End Encryption
  3. Generate New Passphrase
    • Important: Write your passphrase down or store it in a secure password manager.
      • When entering the passphrase, be sure to enter all lowercase letters, include the hyphens, and don’t add any spaces.
      • If you lose your passphrase, there is no way to recover it.
        • You will have to start over and re-enroll additional mobile devices.
        • You may lose access to E2EE videos that you have already recorded.
Step 4 - Enroll your mobile devices

  1. Tap Resume Setup
  2. Follow the in-app instructions to enroll your mobile device in Video End-To-End Encryption.
Step 5 - Enroll your Ring devices

  1. Tap Resume Setup
  2. Follow the in-app instructions to enroll your compatible Ring device in Video End-To-End Encryption.
    • If you have trouble with the set up and are using an iOS device, reboot your device and try set up again.
Step 6 - Test your devices

  1. Once your enrolled Ring device has completed its update and setup, push the front button on your doorbell or trigger motion on your camera to complete the test. This will initialize your Ring device for Video E2EE.
  2. To turn off Video E2EE, simply follow Step 3 of the above instructions, but this time choose to disenroll Video E2EE.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
In 2020, an Amazon software engineer called for the shutdown of Ring, explaining that the service is incompatible with privacy.

Max Eliaser, the Amazon employee insisting that the connected Ring doorbells and cameras should be shelved, posted an explanation on Medium. “The deployment of connected home security cameras that allow footage to be queried centrally are simply not compatible with a free society. The privacy issues are not fixable with regulation and there is no balance that can be struck. Ring should be shut down immediately and not brought back,” he wrote.


THIS!
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
:eek:
Yikes! That’s like those who think being a gynecologist would be fun…almost always the view is terrible!
Not to mention the occasional odors....
Ring is an NSA tool.

Get that, Ring is an NSA tool...
 

Squib

Veteran Member
Not to mention the occasional odors....
Ring is an NSA tool.

Get that, Ring is an NSA tool...

It’s like telling a fat kid not to touch the doughnuts…he can’t resist!

How many .Gov agencies like the NSA, etc just can’t resist hacking into every single social medical thread, ring video, private conversation, confession, confidential medical record, attorney/client meeting, etc.

They’re almost all out of control …they have no honor and usually no respect for the US Constitution or the citizen…and they feel entitled to break laws to do their jobs as most normal people are scum to them.
 
Top