Well, there is the somewhat obvious fact that natural immunity cannot protect one from the ravages of the initial contraction of the disease.What about natural immunity?
Well, there is the somewhat obvious fact that natural immunity cannot protect one from the ravages of the initial contraction of the disease.
Really?Because it's been shown here and many other places to be untrue?
Thats how one gets natural immunity which leads us back to 80+% little to no symptomsWell, there is the somewhat obvious fact that natural immunity cannot protect one from the ravages of the initial contraction of the disease.
Actually its looking like its still holding true with omicron mild symptoms for mostOlder data applies until it no longer does. Just like today with the Omicron and even the Delta variants.
The performance of the vaccine has changed with each new variant - small changes at first, but, as the number of mutations accelerated, so has the vaccine performance degraded. So far, not too bad. Nothing new here.
Look, no one disagrees that eventaully we will need a new vaccine. Right now, we have what we have and for the most part, with a booster, chances of survival are much improved. That is what the CEO said when the complete quote is considered. The OP is busted.
I agree.. He's talking about the current variants. This almost sounds like Facebook Fact checkers... I wonder how much you get paid to be a troll??Quote from CEO: limited, if any" protection against contracting current variants of the disease.
Thread title: Pfizer CEO: Our Vaccines Offer ‘Limited, If Any Protection’
I don't see the selective editing, the current variants are what are hitting people very hard, the CEO admits the vaccines they offer provide limited, if any protection against what is going around. Then recommends a booster of the same non-effective "vaccine".
Yet, none of those address the populous and the 80+% little to no symptoms claim, started from the beginning.This is a screen shot of the hits for first query, took ten seconds...
Some of these you may deem not relevant, eh I just grabbed in a screenshot as much as I figured I could paste.
View attachment 313059
I found one of the screenshot links on post #50 Pfizer, Moderna Covid Shots Less Effective for Immunocompromised, Study Shows - The New York Times (nytimes.com) Sadly people close to me having to deal with cancer treatment. I know even for OTC medicine you have to check with your cancer doctor.I agree.. He's talking about the current variants. This almost sounds like Facebook Fact checkers... I wonder how much you get paid to be a troll??
Yet, none of those address the populous and the 80+% little to no symptoms claim, started from the beginning.
Take the latest from (where was it shitcago?) that tested their sewage and believe there are far more infected than the numbers say and we come to the realization that ...damn...maybe just maybe 80% was correct all along.
"
Over 80% of people with coronavirus didn’t have key symptoms, UK study finds
"
"Over 80% of young people may show no symptoms "
I can keep going, but I think my point is made.
40 second markTrump would agree with you.
when he says shots he does not mean these so-called vaccines. Trump never had one.
The level of specificity you want, if you have doubts, you need to search Pub Med and National Library of Medicine. I have more of those docs on my computer, I will search.. I have not posted those to TB2K because their focus is much narrower than most here want or need.
40 second mark
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6HNicFnOQ
and theres other reports of him saying he got the booster as well.
He's all bout these so called vaccines, but he seems to be against mandates, so thats a good thing
Looking at what you posted, I think we are getting our lines crossed here....the "80+% little to no symptoms" is for those that are not jabbed.There is lots of info out there. D_A
Waning of immunity by Delta predominance in the general population
Real-world effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines
Real-world effectiveness of three COVID-19 vaccines
Researchers from IQVIA Real-World Solutions have investigated how effective these vaccines are against severe disease.www.news-medical.net
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions — United States, March–August 2021
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna...
This report describes COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations for all three vaccines, with Moderna as the most effective against hospitalization.www.cdc.gov
Study shows dramatic decline in effectiveness of all three COVID-19 vaccines over time
Study shows dramatic decline in effectiveness of all three COVID-19 vaccines over time
A study of 780,000 veterans shows a dramatic decline in effectiveness for all three COVID-19 vaccines in use in the U.S.news.yahoo.com
Looking at what you posted, I think we are getting our lines crossed here....the "80+% little to no symptoms" is for those that are not jabbed.
Yup, the quotes I posted were from a quick search. I was shutting down Uhmm or whatever the name is for the false claims he? made.Yea , crossed. What has your searches shown? Have you come up blank? Seems to me lots of general info, but not for what you seem to be looking for. Good luck, I'm done searching.
My X's young 39 yr old girlfriend got the Moderna shot in the summer. Soon after she ended up in the hospital for 8 days cuz had blood clot in lung and leg. Home. Still very sick. Taking blood thinners. She says she can't breathe and even texting is hard for her to do. I don't know why. We don't talk much. She is not getting the 2nd shot.you beat me to it. The side effects can't be denied and are increasing every day.
It's ok man, we constantly hear different things and it's tough to wade through whats real and whats not at times.Well that seems clear, yet it is in conflict with other statements he's made.
He indicates he got the "Vaccine" he generally says get "The Shot" but not here, he says Vax.
But has he had the Vax? any of the three? Booster?
It looks like I was wrong. If he has taken one of the approved vaccines AND had a booster, he's no longer fit to be President in my opinion.
What I heard was that he was conflating Vax's with his monoclonal antibodies treatment received.
He was doing this deliberately to confuse the media, which may be the case, but he's also confusing his supporters.