dstraito
TB Fanatic
Yes I know, another thread on oil spills but honestly, there are TOO many coincidences.
Many people have been convicted of a lot less in terms of insider trading, just ask Martha Stewart.
Why are many questions going unanswered and uninvestigated?
For example:
Why did Goldman Sachs sell off so many shares of BP just days before the spill? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw_8HsU1in4
Same Goldman Sachs CEO that used to be CEO of BP?
Why did CEO BP dump 1/3 of his stockes in the weeks before the disaster?
Why did Hallibruton 2weeks before the disaster buy an oil cleanup company (Boots and Coots) that analysts said was a bad deal?
Why did the Government deny Louisiana the request to build berms to protect their coastline?
Why did the Coast Guard stop prevention the barges sucking up the oil? I don't believe the safety issue.
Why did the administration ban drilling below 500 feet putting thousands of workers out of a job, when they funded Brazil's state owned company to drill at greater depths than even the diaster well? Did it have anything to do with George Soros investing $900 Million in the State owned company? Since when does a foreign state owned company accept private money?
Why does this not stink to anyone else, especially investigative reporters (oxymoron)?
Coincidence that Goldman Sachs is the fourth-largest donor to Democratic campaigns, ranking just below public-employee unions and trial lawyers in its massive support for liberal politicians.
Goldman Sachs seems to be at the center of a lot of controversy:
Why did Fannie Mae invest in a Carbon exchange (CCX)? and a patent to control home electrical socket use?
Why is the administration trying so hard to pass cap and trade when it WILL NOT do one thing for the environment and will cause energy costs to skyrocket to US Citizens? (Power, money, and control?)
Why are so many of the same central figures circling around the CCX?
There are a lot more questions than these, why is no one (besides GB) looking into these areas, seems like it would be a sure Pulitzer prize?
Many people have been convicted of a lot less in terms of insider trading, just ask Martha Stewart.
Why are many questions going unanswered and uninvestigated?
For example:
Why did Goldman Sachs sell off so many shares of BP just days before the spill? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw_8HsU1in4
Same Goldman Sachs CEO that used to be CEO of BP?
The oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is allegedly linked to a Goldman Sachs mega sell off of its shares in BP energy conglomerate just days before.
As BP fails repeatedly in desperate attempts to cap a massive oil leak offshore at 'Deep Water Horizon' in the Gulf of Mexico, suspicion grows over certain 'coincidences.'
Is there really evidence here to support claims of a sinister conspiracy? Financiers Goldman Sachs not only fortuitously dumped millions of its shares in the British oil company, but has strong financial links to the chemical clean up firm tackling the disaster. Moreover, the Wall Street giant's new chairman was boss of BP only three months before.
Sections of the blogosphere are running into overdrive at the stark fact that Goldman Sachs Management (US) sold 6,025,387 of its shares in the British oil giant, BP on March 31, 2010 just days before the rupture of a pipe extracting deep sea oil. Experts variously estimate the spill to be dumping the equivalent of 5,000- 25,000 barrels of oil a day into the Gulf gravely impacting wildlife.
Read more at Suite101: Gulf Oil Spill to Drag Goldman Sachs into Trading Scandal? http://news.suite101.com/article.cf...hs-into-trading-scandal-a246855#ixzz0rhdvgUYz
http://news.suite101.com/article.cf...ag-goldman-sachs-into-trading-scandal-a246855As BP fails repeatedly in desperate attempts to cap a massive oil leak offshore at 'Deep Water Horizon' in the Gulf of Mexico, suspicion grows over certain 'coincidences.'
Is there really evidence here to support claims of a sinister conspiracy? Financiers Goldman Sachs not only fortuitously dumped millions of its shares in the British oil company, but has strong financial links to the chemical clean up firm tackling the disaster. Moreover, the Wall Street giant's new chairman was boss of BP only three months before.
Sections of the blogosphere are running into overdrive at the stark fact that Goldman Sachs Management (US) sold 6,025,387 of its shares in the British oil giant, BP on March 31, 2010 just days before the rupture of a pipe extracting deep sea oil. Experts variously estimate the spill to be dumping the equivalent of 5,000- 25,000 barrels of oil a day into the Gulf gravely impacting wildlife.
Read more at Suite101: Gulf Oil Spill to Drag Goldman Sachs into Trading Scandal? http://news.suite101.com/article.cf...hs-into-trading-scandal-a246855#ixzz0rhdvgUYz
Why did CEO BP dump 1/3 of his stockes in the weeks before the disaster?
Why did Hallibruton 2weeks before the disaster buy an oil cleanup company (Boots and Coots) that analysts said was a bad deal?
Why did the Government deny Louisiana the request to build berms to protect their coastline?
Why did the Coast Guard stop prevention the barges sucking up the oil? I don't believe the safety issue.
Why did the administration ban drilling below 500 feet putting thousands of workers out of a job, when they funded Brazil's state owned company to drill at greater depths than even the diaster well? Did it have anything to do with George Soros investing $900 Million in the State owned company? Since when does a foreign state owned company accept private money?
Why does this not stink to anyone else, especially investigative reporters (oxymoron)?
Coincidence that Goldman Sachs is the fourth-largest donor to Democratic campaigns, ranking just below public-employee unions and trial lawyers in its massive support for liberal politicians.
Goldman Sachs seems to be at the center of a lot of controversy:
Goldman Sachs: "Engineering Every Major Market Manipulation Since The Great Depression"
With a subtitle like "From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression - and they're about to do it again" run, don't walk, to your nearest kiosk and buy Matt Taibbi's latest piece in Rolling Stone magazine. One of the best comprehensive profiles of Government Sachs done to date. Speaking of GS, they sure must be busy today, now that Bernanke is about to be impeached and take the fall for all their machinations.
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major.html
With a subtitle like "From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression - and they're about to do it again" run, don't walk, to your nearest kiosk and buy Matt Taibbi's latest piece in Rolling Stone magazine. One of the best comprehensive profiles of Government Sachs done to date. Speaking of GS, they sure must be busy today, now that Bernanke is about to be impeached and take the fall for all their machinations.
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major.html
Why did Fannie Mae invest in a Carbon exchange (CCX)? and a patent to control home electrical socket use?
Why is the administration trying so hard to pass cap and trade when it WILL NOT do one thing for the environment and will cause energy costs to skyrocket to US Citizens? (Power, money, and control?)
Why are so many of the same central figures circling around the CCX?
There are a lot more questions than these, why is no one (besides GB) looking into these areas, seems like it would be a sure Pulitzer prize?