VIDEO Nurse records conversation as she’s fired for not accepting the vaccine

[intothatgoodnight]

People who are in their nineties or over a hundred have got to be reeling from culture shock.

These folks that you have mentioned are WWII folks, raised during the 1930s economic depression era. They usually have a much tougher mindset, even at their advanced age, that informs them accurately when viewing the present cultural/political/medical landscape. They pull no punches when discussing such.

If these nonagenarians were 40 years younger, but with their life-learned mindset, they would be a formidable political block - of course, an obvious reason WHY none of today's craziness was happening in the 1960s, etc. THEY would NOT have tolerated such, and would have seen right through all of the communist deceit and lies presently being promulgated by TPTB.

Timing is everything.

Do not underestimate the damage that is being caused to our Republic by the 2013 passage of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which was part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. This modification to the original Smith–Mundt Act of 1948 essentially legalizes propaganda by the MSM outlets - in other words, another form of War, By Other Means® (but war, it is) - THIS one change is WHY our MSM is beyond broken, and has become a tool of the communists, to be used AGAINST the American people/culture.

Become CLUED.


intothegoodnight

 

[intothatgoodnight]

From Hero to Zero....No rump shaking down the halls for them anymore. Sarcasm off..Heres the thing, many of us knew this was a HUGE LIE from the start. Some had the foresight to make a lateral, some didn't for a myriad of reasons, some viable. The ones that stayed have been an accomplice to fraud at the least, and murder at the worst. Now facing euthanasia supposed morality raises its head up, looks more like SELF preservation to me. Look up the term Patient Advocate, I feel compassion for the people that died trusting my fellow medical professionals, not so much for the cold, immoral people that I have strove against for the last 28 years while putting the patient first. Another greed infested institution infiltrated when medical care became more about corporations, and greed than effective compassionate medical care. Most of these people wouldn't be allowed to care for my dog much less my family. Those who work the job know that this is true. If the truth ever comes out I will be curious to see how many of these people are brought up on charges...Nurenburg rings bell

Couldn't have said it better.

I recall when Sen. Bill Frist (TN-R Ret.) ran into a MSM buzzsaw because of his involvement in the Hospital Corporation of America (read Wiki here for a bit more background on the corporatizing of the medical system). Frist is bought and sold, and is a part of the present day corporatized medical care swamp. Money is his God.


intothegoodnight

 

[bassgirl]

I hate when someone says "Do the right thing" as they use that to manipulate you into doing their dirty work for them. I've had cops try that with me, damn sure wouldn't let an HR department, security, whatever, try to con me into quitting and saving their asses from a lawsuit.

"Do the right thing" should be a phrase everyone hates and rejects outright.

It’s called gaslighting, and they do it all the time. I swear upper management has taken a course in gaslighting.

 

[Esto Perpetua]

Become CLUED?

That was a bit rude, wasn't it?

 

[Dobbin]

It’s called gaslighting, and they do it all the time. I swear upper management has taken a course in gaslighting.

The classic gaslighting comes from a 1940s era play/movie.

Google query: Origins of the term "gaslighting."

The term “gaslighting” actually comes from a 1938 play, “Gas Light” (which was turned into a more widely known movie in 1944, “Gaslight”), where a husband manipulates his wife to make her think she's actually losing her sense of reality so he can commit her to a mental institution and steal her inheritance.Jul 13, 2

IIRC the husband "dims" the lights. When the wife notices he says "its all in your mind."

Today (and this is your "in") the term is used more loosely to describe "manipulation." In your case "Do the right thing" implies that EVERYONE knows what that is, and if you don't know or don't do - shame on you. It's a way to "shame" you into a specific course of action.

Additional at gaslighting | Definition, Origins, & Facts

The term is derived from the title of a 1938 British stage play, Gas Light, which was subsequently produced as a film, Gaslight, in the United Kingdom (1940) and the United States (1944). Those dramas vividly, if somewhat simplistically, depicted some of the basic elements of the technique. These may include: attempting to convince the victim of the truth of something intuitively bizarre or outrageous by forcefully insisting on it or by marshaling superficial evidence; flatly denying that one has said or done something that one has obviously said or done; dismissing the victim’s contrary perceptions or feelings as invalid or pathological; questioning the knowledge and impugning the motives of persons who contradict the viewpoint of the gaslighter; gradually isolating the victim from independent sources of information and validation, including other people; and manipulating the physical environment to encourage the victim to doubt the veracity of his memories or perception. In the play and films, for example, a deceitful husband drives his wife to near insanity by convincing her that she is a kleptomaniac and that she has only imagined the sounds in the attic and the dimming of the gaslights in their house, which were actually the result of his searching for her aunt’s missing jewels.

Today, the Democrats accuse Trump et al of "gaslighting" - but the reality is that more often than not, Trump et al are correct and the Democrats are attempting "diversion" or "discredit" on the basis of a false claim of gaslighting. I.e. the Democrats themselves are gaslighting on the basis of the claim alone.

It helps when you control the MEEDIA - and that's all the public sees.

Dobbin

 

[kytom]

My blood is boiling!!!!

Could you post a link

 

[artichoke]

This is how I'm being treated. They've placed me in "absent without leave" status and ignoring me. I won't be receiving pay for this pay period. They've encouraged me to resign and I've not only said no but have repeatedly told them that I'm ready to return to work (without conditions). But they've barred me from the building where I work so if I go there I could face federal trespassing charges.

I look at it this way. I win no matter what. They'll either stop trying to enforce the mandates, or they'll figure out how to terminate me and I'll sue. A big fat settlement check from uncle sugar would suit me just fine. He's taken enough from me... getting a little back would be a nice change.

If you haven't, I suggest you explain this in writing to the HR department. When it comes to lawsuits, written evidence is the easiest and clearest. Even if HR doesn't reply, the fact that you sent such a letter without a reply is telling.

 

[LittleYellowFlower]

Could you post a link

Sorry but I am not the OP. I was just the first to comment.

 

[kytom]

So it starts.

View: https://youtu.be/YUEw0L8VC7o


3 min

Could you please post a link so I can share it. Thank you

 

[kytom]

Sorry but I am not the OP. I was just the first to comment.

Sorry I'm an old dude with a new phone I haven't figured out how to use it yet

 

[et2]

Could you please post a link so I can share it. Thank you

its in the first post. Right under the video

View: https://youtu.be/YUEw0L8VC7o

 

[Countrymouse]

There is a rule in employment law which requires an employer to physically "remove" a terminated employee or bar them from work (that if he/she doesn't remove themselves.)

It's contract law. If you "fire" a contractor and you allow them to continue work - you're liable to continue their pay IRRESPECTIVE of any previous notice.

You have to intercede and prevent them from continuing work. Either by gate, trespass law (enforced by authorities), judicial order.

If you let them continue its sort of akin to the "ownership by adverse possession laws" of land ownership. They gain the right since you don't intercede.

I see in the above case a Security person removed her under "color of law." She should have stayed in her seat until she was physically carried from the site, and then sit in the waiting room until served with a No Trespass injunction.

Once outside, she should "team up" with her work associates, then and there on the curb form a "Union" - and go on strike for continued employment. There are all sorts of "Unions" the Socialists are soft on - and all sorts of way to keep the public pressure on the hospital.

Dobbin

But---technically, they're NOT "contractors", are they? They're direct EMPLOYEES of the hospital system, not independent contractors.

 

[Countrymouse]

If you haven't, I suggest you explain this in writing to the HR department. When it comes to lawsuits, written evidence is the easiest and clearest. Even if HR doesn't reply, the fact that you sent such a letter without a reply is telling.

CERTIFIED MAIL, SIGNATURE REQUIRED, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED---BY NAME to the HEAD of the HR DEPARTMENT

 

[Blue 5]

If you haven't, I suggest you explain this in writing to the HR department. When it comes to lawsuits, written evidence is the easiest and clearest. Even if HR doesn't reply, the fact that you sent such a letter without a reply is telling.

Good advice, and already done.