POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

[marsh]

EXCLUSIVE: In 2020 Wisconsin Had Over 265,000 Mostly Illegitimate 'Indefinitely Confined' Votes, Instead of Political Leaders Addressing 2020 They Now Want to Update the Law | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

In the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, the state had more than 265,000 ‘indefinitely confined’ voters. This massive increase was challenged in the courts. The state’s response was to do nothing. Now they want to fix this going forward. In the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, there was a massive increase...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE: In 2020 Wisconsin Had Over 265,000 Mostly Illegitimate ‘Indefinitely Confined’ Votes, Instead of Political Leaders Addressing 2020 They Now Want to Update the Law

By Joe Hoft
Published January 24, 2022 at 9:45am

In the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, the state had more than 265,000 ‘indefinitely confined’ voters. This massive increase was challenged in the courts. The state’s response was to do nothing. Now they want to fix this going forward.

In the 2020 Election in Wisconsin, there was a massive increase in ‘indefinitely confined voters’ in the state. It was clear that most of these votes were not legitimate. The Supreme Court in Wisconsin agreed.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court reviewed the state’s process surrounding indefinitely confined voters and observed that the Democrat Governor issued a directive in March 2020 regarding COVID-19. Based on this, the Dane County and Milwaukee County clerks issued almost identical orders declaring that all voters may consider themselves indefinitely confined due to illness, a part of which is noted below:

I have informed Dane County Municipal Clerks that during this emergency and based on the Governors Stay at Home order I am declaring all Dane County voters may indicate as needed that they are indefinitely confined due to illness. This declaration will make it easier for Dane County voters to participate in this election by mail in these difficult times. I urge all voters who request a ballot and have trouble presenting a valid ID to indicate that they are indefinitely confined.

The Supreme Court ruled that a county clerk “may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.” The Court went on to say if voters, “did not follow the statutory mandate and continued to vote as indefinitely confined, despite no longer meeting the statutory requirements, they would cast their votes contrary to the statute.”

The Wisconsin Elections Commission shared with us that they noted that “Nowhere in the [Supreme Court] decision does the court order the state to take any action in making a determination on whether voters qualify as indefinitely confined.” This corrupt group did nothing with the court’s decision.
We covered all of this in an article nearly one year ago.

Wisconsin's 'Indefinitely Confined' Voter Status Excludes Requirement for Voter IDs - 265,000 Ballots Cast in 2020 Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Wisconsin’s Indefinitely Confined voter status is ripe for fraud – expect Democrats to promote this status in all 50 states soon.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Now the legislature decides to finally do something. To hell with the stolen 2020 Election, let’s forget that and make sure it doesn’t happen in the future – is their strategy.

An amendment to Wisconsin law is being proposed that would address concerns with ‘indefinitely confined’ voters in the state. Here is that amendment.

WI Indefinitely Confined Voter Amend 21-4680_P1 by Jim Hoft on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)


Download this PDF

There is still time to address the invalid indefinitely confined votes in the 2020 Election. Those who pushed people in the state to apply for indefinitely confined status should be held accountable as well. Why won’t the political leaders in Wisconsin do anything to determine the accurate number of valid votes in the 2020 Election?

 

[marsh]

Joe diGenova: It's Very Clear Ray Epps Was Operating as a 'Cut-Out' for FBI (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The deceit of the radical left and their cohorts never ends.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Joe diGenova: It’s Very Clear Ray Epps Was Operating as a ‘Cut-Out’ for FBI (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published January 24, 2022 at 10:15am

The deceit of the radical left and their cohorts never ends.

Former US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Joe diGenova, went on with Sebastian Gorka to discuss the curious case of Ray Epps, the January 6 instigator who led efforts to storm the US Capitol but for some strange reason has never been indicted or investigated by the Biden regime.

Joe diGenova described Ray Epps as a “cut-out” — an operative working for the FBI.

Joe diGenova: All this stuff wondering about who Ray Epps is and whether or not he worked for the FBI? It’s pretty clear to me because I’ve run informants. I’ve also run something called the cutout, where you don’t work for the FBI but work for a third party who then reports to the FBI. And I think Ray Epps was working for a third party, probably somebody who used to work in Congress on the intelligence committee and then report to the FBI through that third party. It’s not very mysterious. He clearly did something… We shall find out.

Rep. Matt Gaetz then went on the War Room this morning to add that the Democrats used the “whistleblower”, Eric Ciarramella, in the Trump impeachment scam as the cut-out for their source, like Vindmann, who was on the Ukrainian call with President Trump.

What scoundrels we are up against!

Joe diGenova: It's Very Clear Ray Epps War Operating as a 'Cut-Out' for FBI 4:10 min

Joe diGenova: It's Very Clear Ray Epps War Operating as a 'Cut-Out' for FBI
The Gateway Pundit Published January 24, 2022

 

[marsh]

Report: Pathetic RINO Missouri Governor Mike Parson Is Pushing "Ranked Choice" Voting in Attempt to Help Democrats in State | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Pathetic RINO Governor Mike Parson is reportedly pushing “ranked choice” voting in this Trump +15 state in order to flip several statewide and national seats to Democrats in upcoming elections.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Report: Pathetic RINO Missouri Governor Mike Parson Is Pushing “Ranked Choice” Voting in Attempt to Help Democrats in State

By Jim Hoft
Published January 24, 2022 at 11:15am

Pathetic RINO Governor Mike Parson is reportedly pushing “ranked choice” voting in this Trump +15 state in order to flip several statewide and national seats to Democrats in upcoming elections.

This is the latest disgusting move by the weak Republican placeholder governor.

Missouri voters resoundingly reject the Marxist totalitarian policies of the modern-day left. But Governor Parson wants to change that by implementing the “ranked choice” voting in the state.

The RINOs in Missouri are in a league of their own.

A ranked-choice voting system (RCV) is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. If a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, he or she is declared the winner. If no candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated. First-preference votes cast for the failed candidate are eliminated, lifting the second-preference choices indicated on those ballots. A new tally is conducted to determine whether any candidate has won a majority of the adjusted votes. The process is repeated until a candidate wins an outright majority.

The process allows Democrats the ability to steal seats in a red state like Missouri. So why would RINO Governor Parson support this?

Via Hennessey’s View on Substack.

Parson vs. Fair Elections
Of surpassing concern to Missourians is what comes after Parson. His hand-picked lieutenant governor, Mike Kehoe, gets along better with radical Democrats than with conservative Missouri state senators. And he expects to become Missouri’s next governor by proclamation.

Parson, Kehoe, and several legislative leaders are pushing a change to Missouri elections to replace traditional elections with the “rank choice” process. This is a scam. Party rats use this scam to guarantee “moderate” Republicans win all the big races. Here’s how it works, via the Kansas City Star:

A group called Better Elections is pushing an initiative petition that would amend Missouri’s constitution to allow all voters to vote for any candidate in a combined primary.

The four candidates in the primary with the most votes would advance to the general election, regardless of party.

Then in the general election, voters would be allowed to rank those four candidates from first choice to last — or just vote for their first choice.

Better Elections is a shady organization with a tiny cyber footprint. Its treasurer in Missouri, Dave Roland, formerly of the Show-Me Institute, Rex Singquefiel’s joint. A search on OpenSecrets revealed no publicly available records of donors or funding for Better Elections.[/QUOTE]

Further, the Better Elections for Missouri website offers zero evidence that their Condorcet voting method would change anything. Zero evidence. They want the Show-Me State to take their word for it. “Trust me, I’m an honest man” would be a great tagline for the outfit.

The best argument against “Better Elections” is looking at who supports their scheme: the weakest Republican governor since Jay Nixon and the guy who wants to take his place.
No thanks.

 

[marsh]

Georgia District Attorney Granted Special Grand Jury This Spring to Probe Trump's "Election Interference" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

First, they steal the election in historic fashion.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Georgia District Attorney Granted Special Grand Jury This Spring to Probe Trump’s “Election Interference”

By Jim Hoft
Published January 24, 2022 at 3:42pm

First, they steal the election in historic fashion.

Then, they go after all of the people who spoke out against their crimes.
This will not end well — for the American left. Their day is coming.

While ignoring mounds of election fraud, criminal and operational issues involved in the 2020 Election, Fulton County Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis last week requested local Fulton County open a grand jury to look into actions by President Trump related to her county.

On Monday Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis was granted a special grand jury to probe President Trump’s so-called “election interference” this spring.

KEYT.com reported:

An Atlanta-area district attorney investigating former President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia will be allowed to seat a special grand jury this spring.

By Jason Morris and Sara Murray, CNN

An Atlanta-area district attorney investigating former President Donald Trump‘s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia will be allowed to seat a special grand jury this spring.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis requested last week to seat a special grand jury starting May 2. Fulton County Superior Court judges approved the request on Monday.

The special grand jury will allow Willis to seat a panel entirely focused on gathering evidence in the Trump investigation. She said she needed such a grand jury in order to issue subpoenas to compel witnesses to testify and to gather additional evidence.

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Capitol Police are spying on members of Congress…
Posted by Kane on January 24, 2022 8:40 pm




After the Jan. 6 breach, the Capitol Police’s intelligence unit quietly started scrutinizing the backgrounds of people who meet with lawmakers, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Examining the social media feeds of people who aren’t suspected of crimes, however, is a controversial move for law enforcement and intelligence officials given the civil liberties concerns it raises.

Among those who have been subject to new Capitol Police scrutiny are Hill staffers, the three people said. All spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) said in an interview that he is unaware of any members who know about the “very, very bad” practice. “Whatever they think that sounds like for security, it sounds dangerously close — if not already over the line — to spying on members of Congress, their staff, their constituents and their supporters,” said Armstrong, a former criminal defense attorney.

“Anybody involved with implementing this without making it known to the actual members of Congress should resign or be fired immediately,” he added. “And I’m not big on calling for resignations.”

Several Capitol Police intelligence analysts have already raised concerns about the practice to the department’s inspector general, according to one of the people who spoke for this story.

The Capitol Police, in a statement, defended the practice of searching for public information about people meeting with lawmakers and said the department coordinates the work with members’ offices.

“These reports are incredibly disturbing. It is unthinkable that any government entity would conduct secret investigations to build political dossiers on private Americans. The American people deserve to know what Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi knew and directed, and when. Senator Rick Scott believes the Senate Rules Committee should immediately investigate.”

The unit has also scrutinized multiple donors who have met with House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.). A spokesperson for Scalise said the congressman was unaware of the scrutiny those meetings received.

A spokesperson for the House Administration Committee, which has jurisdiction over chamber security matters and is chaired by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), declined to comment.

Continue reading…

 

[marsh]

Pelosi's Capitol Police Gathering "Intelligence" on Hill Staffers and Citizens Who Meet with Lawmakers | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Nancy Pelosi’s Capitol Police is secretly gathering “intelligence” on Hill staffers and American citizens who meet with lawmakers according to Politico.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Pelosi’s Capitol Police Gathering “Intelligence” on Hill Staffers and Citizens Who Meet with Lawmakers

By Cristina Laila
Published January 24, 2022 at 6:56pm

Nancy Pelosi’s Capitol Police is secretly gathering “intelligence” on Hill staffers and American citizens who meet with lawmakers according to Politico.

Pelosi’s police are scrutinizing social media accounts of completely innocent people.

“Whatever they think that sounds like for security, it sounds dangerously close — if not already over the line — to spying on members of Congress, their staff, their constituents and their supporters,” Rep. Kelly Armstrong, a former criminal defense attorney told Politico.

“Anybody involved with implementing this without making it known to the actual members of Congress should resign or be fired immediately,” he added. “And I’m not big on calling for resignations.”

According to a template reviewed by Politico, Capitol Police are running “background checks” on people meeting with lawmakers including donors, associates and staffers.

In other words, Pelosi’s police are spying on political opponents and people who may disagree with the Biden Regime.

The spy operation went so far as to provide information about the buildings where members of Congress hold their meetings.

For example, who owns the building? Is there a foreign interest in the building?
How is this even legal??

Far-left Politico reported:

After the Jan. 6 insurrection, the Capitol Police’s intelligence unit quietly started scrutinizing the backgrounds of people who meet with lawmakers, according to three people familiar with the matter.

POLITICO also viewed written communications describing the new approach, part of a host of changes that the department implemented after the Capitol attack. Examining the social media feeds of people who aren’t suspected of crimes, however, is a controversial move for law enforcement and intelligence officials given the civil liberties concerns it raises.

Among those who have been subject to new Capitol Police scrutiny are Hill staffers, the three people said. All spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

Several Capitol Police intelligence analysts have already raised concerns about the practice to the department’s inspector general, according to one of the people who spoke for this story.

The Capitol Police, in a statement, defended the practice of searching for public information about people meeting with lawmakers and said the department coordinates the work with members’ offices.

“The more public information we have, the better we can understand what kind and how much security is necessary,” the statement said.

Read the full report on Pelosi’s spies here.

 

[marsh]

Exclusive — Alan Dershowitz: January 6 Committee 'Reminds Me' of 'McCarthyism'

The January 6 committee "reminds me a little bit of McCarthyism" and lacks "an appropriate legislative purpose," Alan Dershowitz said.

www.breitbart.com

Exclusive — Alan Dershowitz: January 6 Committee ‘Reminds Me’ of ‘McCarthyism’
147

Drew Angerer/Getty Images
ROBERT KRAYCHIK24 Jan 2022226

Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz described the Democrat-run House committee ostensibly investigating the events of January 6 as reminiscent of the House Un-American Activities Committee and “McCarthyism” on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Sunday with host Joel Pollak.

“[The January 6 committee] reminds me a little bit of McCarthyism, where you had committees like the House Un-American Activities Committee, which didn’t have an appropriate legislative purpose,” Dershowitz said. “They were just trying to subpoena people for political and ideological purposes.”

The House commission is named the Select Committee to Investigate the Attack on the United States Capitol.

Pollak invited Dershowitz’s remarks on the Supreme Court’s rejection of former President Donald Trump’s attempt to use executive privilege to protect records pursued by congressional committee.

SCOTUS reported, “Supreme Court turned down a request by former President Donald Trump to block the release of presidential records that the committee is seeking. The ruling clears the way for the National Archives to turn over several hundred pages of documents to the committee immediately. Only Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that he disagreed with the court’s decision.”

Dershowitz stated, “The Supreme Court … hasn’t decided the core issue, and that is whether or not an incumbent president can deny the right of a prior president to assert executive privilege over conversations he had while he was in the office.

I think the answer to that should be clear and unanimous by the Supreme Court.

Of course a former president has the right to assert privilege, otherwise privilege is meaningless, otherwise it just lasts as long as you’re in office, and no president would ever feel comfortable having a confidential conversation with aides or assistants.”

https://soundcloud.com/breitbart%2Falan-dershowitz-january-23-2022 View: https://soundcloud.com/breitbart/alan-dershowitz-january-23-2022
16:02 min

“The harder question is particularization,” he continued. “What kinds of issues come within executive privilege? And that’s what the Supreme Court didn’t want to essentially decide. It’s going to be decided on a document-by-document and person-by-person basis, but I do think, ultimately, there are going to be some real questions raised about the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.”

“I’m involved in one such case,” Dershowitz disclosed. “So I admit my bias. I’m representing the people from the My Pillow company who are subject to a subpoena, and we are challenging that subpoena. … So I’m not a neutral or objective constitutional analyst when it comes to that. I want to put my own bias on the table.”

Pollak then asked about New York’s imposition of race-based rationing of monoclonal antibody treatment for coronavirus patients.

“It’s indefensible,” Dershowitz replied. “Why should an African American billionaire who runs a hedge fund and who went to Groton and Exeter and Harvard Law School and is making hundreds of millions of dollars a year, why should he be put on the line ahead of some poor working class white person just because of race? That’s indefensible and inexcusable. You can’t do that.”

“If the 14th Amendment means anything, it means that,” he continued. “We’ve had experience when we try to use race. We did it, obviously, when a liberal president – Franklin Delano Roosevelt – confined 110,000 Japanese Americans in detention centers based exclusively on their race. We’re having it now, somewhat, in race-based affirmative action programs, which are coming under increasing scrutiny, but you can’t do it with medical issues.”

He concluded, “You can say that people who have a history of illness, people who are susceptible to illness, people who have less access to medical care [should be prioritized for rationed healthcare]. You can make all of those distinctions, but you cannot use race as a surrogate for other issues when you can use the other issues just as easily.”

 

[marsh]

6 People Present at Scene of Ashli Babbitt Killing Still Not Arrested by the FBI, Family Seeks Identities

Most of the men who attacked the Speaker’s Lobby doors at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, ...

www.theepochtimes.com

The Ashli Babbitt family seeks the identities of six men who were in the Speaker's Lobby hallway in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. (Graphic/The Epoch Times)
US NEWS

6 People Present at Scene of Ashli Babbitt Killing Still Not Arrested by the FBI, Family Seeks Identities
Family asks for the public's help identifying photos of witnesses from Jan. 6
By Joseph M. Hanneman

January 20, 2022 Updated: January 21, 2022

Most of the men who attacked the Speaker’s Lobby doors at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, have not been identified or arrested, and the family of Ashli Babbitt wants to question them about the events that led up to her shooting death.

Of the dozens of people who congregated before the double doors leading from the hallway into the Speaker’s Lobby that day, only two have been arrested by the FBI. The Babbitt family has identified at least six others who could have valuable information on what took place before and after U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd shot and killed Babbitt.

Aaron Babbitt said identifying these men is an important part of his investigation into his wife’s killing. He said the authorities are not interested in pursuing it.

“To look into these people would go against what they’re trying to do, which is to just forget about Ashli and just look the other way,” Aaron Babbitt told The Epoch Times. “‘Pay no attention to what’s going on over there.’ So they don’t want these people. They probably don’t want to find them. Whether they are government actors or informants or whatever, they don’t want to really find those people.”

Tayler Hansen, the video journalist who documented the shooting, said the most active rioters from the hallway are still unknowns.


The unknown black-clad #Ninja ducks for cover after the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. The SWAT team member did not know at the time who fired the shot that killed Babbitt. (Tayler Hansen/For The Epoch Times)

“The good majority of the people who haven’t been named are the ones being the most violent,” Hansen told The Epoch Times. “Inciting the window breaking and actually causing everything that took place in that room. The only one who has been named that actively took part was Zachary Alam.”

Alam was arrested by federal agents on Jan. 30, 2021, and later indicted for his well-documented role in attacking the Speaker’s Lobby doors. Alam portrayed himself that day as being a member of the Proud Boys, but comments he made to Hansen earlier that day don’t indicate a patriotic disposition.

“This is insane, bro,” Alam says to Hansen, who was live-streaming to Instagram at the time. “We’d love to [expletive] revolutionize the whole world. It’s the repetition of what happened decades and centuries ago and it’s repeating itself. It’s going down right now!”

Key Players in Hallway Action
The “unknowns” include a man nicknamed by internet sleuths as #RedOnRedGlasses, who was in the front line at the Speaker’s Lobby at numerous points. He was directly to Ashli Babbitt’s left when she climbed into the open window and was shot, video shows. After Ashli Babbitt is carried away by police, he is at the front line, shouting at officers.

#RedOnRedGlasses was directly to Ashli Babbitt’s left when she was shot at the U.S. Capitol. (FBI)

#RedOnRedGlasses is also on video launching a long 2-by-4 beam of lumber through a ground-level window of the Capitol. This man is listed as photo No. 300 on the FBI’s Jan. 6 wanted list.

One of the most mysterious of the unknowns is #TwoBlueJacket, who stood in the north corner of the hallway during much of the unrest.

He is seen to Ashli Babbitt’s right as she pleads with police to call for backup. After the police move aside from the doors, he uses his right shoulder in an attempt to open the door. He also appears to flash some kind of hand signals while Babbitt is shouting at the officers.

A man known as #TwoBlueJacket was in the Speaker’s Lobby hallway when Ashli Babbitt was shot on Jan. 6, 2021. (FBI)
Just before Ashli Babbitt is shot, #TwoBlueJacket moves across the hall and departs from view. He is seen on video elsewhere on the Capitol grounds, wearing a knit cap and a hood, carrying a black backpack. He is listed as photo No. 302 by the FBI.

A man called #WhiteLogoInsider and on some sites #Ninja moves into the north hallway corner just before Ashli Babbitt climbs into the side window and is shot.

She falls at his feet, between him and #RedOnRedGlasses.

#Ninja ducks down as a Capitol Police SWAT team member aims his rifle into the Speaker’s Lobby, not knowing at the time who fired the shot at Ashli Babbitt.

“They thought it was an active shooter at the time, until they cleared it,” Hansen said.

Ninja is seen on video with his hands up as police and bystanders attempt to render aid to Ashli Babbitt. Later he is seen talking to a plainclothes Sergeant at Arms agent in the hallway corner.

One of the men who tried to kick the Speaker’s Lobby door in is #MrFlyEyes, who is listed as photo No. 304 on the FBI wanted site. As rioter Alam is beating on the glass with a helmet, #MrFlyEyes tries kicking the left-side door. He appeared to be live-streaming to Instagram at the time.

The #GadsdenFlagMan is seen standing directly behind Alam as he pounds the door and glass window with a helmet. After the police leave the doors unguarded, he kicks the doors and tries to push them open.


#MrFlyEyes participated in rioting at the Speaker’s Lobby doors on Jan. 6, 2021. (FBI)

He stays on the scene until after Ashli Babbitt is carried downstairs by SWAT team members. Most of the time on video his face is covered by a surgical mask, but he briefly removed it. It does not appear he is listed by the FBI as wanted.
#HuskyMarioInsider was present during much of the rioting, shouting at police and imploring them to let protesters into the Speaker’s Lobby. “We don’t want to hurt nobody. We just want to go in the House!” he shouts just before Alam punches one of the windows, the video shows. His is photo No. 303 on the FBI list.

Another man who attacked one of the door windows with the dowel of a flag pole has also not been identified. He has his back to the cameras during the violence.

“That should be looked into, their identities,” Hansen said, “because they could easily be federal informants. There’s a reason why they didn’t show up on the FBI’s list—only some of them did—and even those that have haven’t been properly identified.

Anyone who recognizes these men should report the identities using a direct message to the @ForAshli Twitter page or on the RobertsandWood.com web site. (Graphic by The Epoch Times)

“If people are looking for federal informants or federal agitators of any sort, they should really pay attention to the Ashli Babbitt video closely,” Hansen said.

Many of these unidentified figures entered the Capitol at the same time, as part of a crowd that grew as they moved from the Rotunda into other areas of the Capitol.

Scene Processing a Disappointment
Aaron Babbitt said the lack of scene processing by crime-scene investigators remains among his deep frustrations from that day. Police are seen tracking through Ashli’s blood on the floor and leaving red footprints in the hallway and down the stairs. Someone tosses her beanie cap right into the blood pool.

“I don’t think there was any investigation on the scene. Nothing,” Aaron Babbitt said. “They just took the videos, what they were, and used their own videos that they won’t show anybody.”

Rumble video 2:17 min

Surveillance video of the hallway is believed to be among 14,000 hours of video of events that day possessed by the U.S. Department of Justice.

That video remains under a federal protective order. An overhead view of the hallway action would provide the clearest view of the actions of the various rioters and bystanders. The video likely will be among items subpoenaed by criminal defense lawyers and those filing civil lawsuits.

Aaron Babbitt said it pains him to see how his wife was wheeled out to the ambulance, with her bare chest exposed, only to be captured on camera. “They didn’t even have the decency to give her any dignity,” he said. “They wheeled her out there bare chested in front of the world.”

Harassment Continues
Aaron Babbitt told The Epoch Times he continues to be harassed by people who denigrate his wife.

“I think I got three or four calls on Martin Luther King Day, people just calling in and saying, ‘Hey, is Ashli coming to work today?’” he said. “I’ve had it all, seen it all. People calling up—because I run a pool service—and they’re like, ‘Hey, any way Ashli can come out to clean my pool?’ ”


Ashli Babbitt with her favorite canine companion, Kenai. Aaron Babbitt said Kenai died of a broken heart several weeks after Ashli was killed. (Courtesy Aaron Babbitt)

“It happens enough times you just realize these are scum of the earth people that have no backbone,” Aaron Babbitt said. The threats and hateful comments started on Jan. 7, 2021.

“I’m just getting these awful messages and I’m like, ‘I just lost my wife. What kind of scum of the earth are you?’” he said.

Aaron Babbitt is buoyed by the renewed public interest in his wife’s case and the questions surrounding her killing. He is also receiving emotional and financial support as the family prepares a lawsuit against police and potentially others.

Former President Donald J. Trump, who phoned Aaron Babbitt in July to offer support, made prominent mention of Ashli Babbitt during a huge Arizona rally on Jan. 15.

Trump slammed Byrd as an “out-of-control dope” whose identity was shielded by authorities for eight months after the shooting.

“He couldn’t get on television fast enough,” Trump said, referring to a 2021 interview Byrd did with Lester Holt of NBC News. “The guy who shot Ashli Babbitt for no reason, this guy couldn’t get on television fast enough. He’s so proud of himself.

“Let’s see how he could do without the protections that he got. And, by the way, if that happened the other way around, they’d be calling, ‘Let’s bring back the electric chair,’ that’s what they’d be calling for. He’s a disgrace the way he shot Ashli.”

 

[marsh]

Breaking: Ballot Box Video Missing in Georgia | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Random Georgia ballot drop box Garland Favorito and VoterGA held a press conference last Thursday at 10 AM Eastern to discuss the lack of chain of custody documentation on the state’s ballot drop-box implementation.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Breaking: Georgia Officials Tampered With and Deleted Hours of Ballot Box Video Before It Was Released to Investigators

By Jim Hoft
Published January 25, 2022 at 1:10pm

Random Georgia ballot drop box

Garland Favorito and VoterGA held a press conference last Thursday at 10 AM Eastern to discuss the lack of chain of custody documentation on the state’s ballot drop-box implementation.

According to Garland and VoterGA at least 100,000 Georgia ballots lack the adequate chain of custody documents from the 2020 election. The number is likely much larger than this. Garland Favorito told The Gateway Pundit his investigation corroborates the True the Vote ballot box fraud investigation in the state of Georgia. Garland told us they still have no idea how many ballots came from drop boxes in 202o. That number has not been provided by the state! This is absolutely shocking that that number was never released.

During the presentation last Thursday VoterGA chain of custody team lead, David Hancock discussed the group’s findings.

David Hancock pointed out in his presentation that state officials tampered with and deleted hours of ballot box video before it was turned over to investigators.

The Gateway Pundit spoke with anonymous investigators who said this was a common tactic used to hide the evidence.

Hancock discussed how one video that was handed over cut out 4 hours in the middle of the video.

The boxes were also not lit up for the cameras and several cameras were set up behind boxes so you could not see anything that was happening in front of the ballot box.

Several officials and their media lackeys said this was the most secure election ever.

What a lie.
Via Liz Harrington.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486037722695356421

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1486037722695356421
.38 min

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486038352533106691

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1486038352533106691
1:08 min

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486038914666221571

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1486038914666221571
1:35 min

 

[marsh]

Oath Keepers Leader Pleads Not Guilty to Seditious Conspiracy | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes has pleaded not guilty to the charge of “seditious conspiracy.” Rhodes, and ten other members of the organization, were arrested and charged with the extreme offense over their roles in the January 6 protest at the Capitol.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Oath Keepers Leader Pleads Not Guilty to Seditious Conspiracy

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published January 25, 2022 at 11:35am

Oath Keepers President Stewart Rhodes

Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes has pleaded not guilty to the charge of “seditious conspiracy.”

Rhodes, and ten other members of the organization, were arrested and charged with the extreme offense over their roles in the January 6 protest at the Capitol.

“A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment yesterday, which was unsealed today, charging 11 defendants with seditious conspiracy and other charges for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, which disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress that was in the process of ascertaining and counting the electoral votes related to the presidential election,” the Justice Department said in a press release about the arrests.

On Tuesday, Rhodes and most of his co-defendants entered pleas of “not guilty” at a preliminary hearing before a federal judge in Washington, D.C.

If convicted of seditious conspiracy, Rhodes and the others potentially face up to 20 years in prison.

Prosecutors have claimed that Rhodes is “too dangerous” to be released on bond ahead of his trial.

“There is overwhelming evidence that Rhodes organized a plot to oppose by force the execution of the laws of the United States and that he possesses the willingness and capacity to continue to engage in criminal conduct,” Justice Department lawyers wrote. “Under these circumstances, only pretrial detention can protect the community from the danger Rhodes poses.”

Rhodes’ attorney has said in a statement that the allegations are baseless.
“The bald-faced myth that anyone wanted to stop the certification is inexcusable,” attorney Jonathon Moseley said in a statement to The Hill. “The claims in the detention motion of Stewart Rhodes — which apply to other Oath Keepers as well like Kelly Meggs — are fiction. We know that the prosecutors know that what they claim is totally false. We have the documents. We have the videos. The prosecutors know that we know that they know that their narrative is a John Grisham novel, totally false.”

The DOJ claimed in a press release at the time of the arrests that, “the defendants conspired through a variety of manners and means, including: organizing into teams that were prepared and willing to use force and to transport firearms and ammunition into Washington, D.C.; recruiting members and affiliates to participate in the conspiracy; organizing trainings to teach and learn paramilitary combat tactics; bringing and contributing paramilitary gear, weapons, and supplies – including knives, batons, camouflaged combat uniforms, tactical vests with plates, helmets, eye protection, and radio equipment – to the Capitol grounds; breaching and attempting to take control of the Capitol grounds and building on Jan. 6, 2021, in an effort to prevent, hinder and delay the certification of the electoral college vote; using force against law enforcement officers while inside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021; continuing to plot, after Jan. 6, 2021, to oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power, and using websites, social media, text messaging and encrypted messaging applications to communicate with co-conspirators and others.”

This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices in the Northern District of Texas and the District of Arizona have also provided assistance.

Over 725 people have been arrested for the protest, from every state in the nation.

 

[marsh]

REMINDER: Merrick Garland's DOJ Quietly Dismissed Charges Against 31 Violent Antifa Terrorists -- While 40 J-6ers Rot in Prison Over a Year Now with No Rights | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Enemies of the people.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

REMINDER: Merrick Garland’s DOJ Quietly Dismissed Charges Against 31 Violent Antifa Terrorists — While 40 J-6ers Rot in Prison Over a Year Now with No Rights

By Jim Hoft
Published January 25, 2022 at 8:51am

Enemies of the people.
In March of 2021, the Biden Department of Justice quietly dismissed charges against 31 violent Antifa terrorists who clashed with federal agents in 2020.

Federal prosecutors dismissed more than one-third of cases stemming from violent protests in downtown Portland back in 2020, when Antifa protesters clashed with federal agents.

Kyle Iboshi reviewed federal court records and found 31 of the 90 protest cases have been dismissed by the U.S. Department of Justice, including a mix of misdemeanor and felony charges.

Black Lives Matter-Antifa mobs caused over one billion dollars in damages in cities across Americain 2020. In Minneapolis alone, Black Lives Matter mobs damaged or destroyed over 1,500 businesses or buildings.

Over 700 police officers were injured in the BLM riots — and that was back in June 2020 at the start of the historic leftist riots!

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367283364890243073

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1367283364890243073
.13 min

Black Lives Matter was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history

Democrats incited the Black Lives Matter mobs for months as they destroyed communities across the country.

Democrats also pushed to defund the police — something they finally admit has ruined lives and communities across the country.

While terrorists, looters and Antifa demons were given a pass by the Biden regime — several conservative Americans continue to languish in prison in Washington DC without any constitutional rights or the humane treatment offered to Gitmo detainees.

This is who is leading the country today. What a disgrace.

The Biden regime, in just one year, has destroyed America’s place in the world as a beacon for human rights and a home for the victims of political persecution.

Note- Featured image by Andrew Marcus of Antifa terrorists destroying vehicles in Washington DC at the Trump inauguration.

 

[Dobbin]

6 People Present at Scene of Ashli Babbitt Killing Still Not Arrested by the FBI, Family Seeks Identities

I saw "Gadsden Man" (Yellow Flag Man" in my previous statements) in the video apparently "pushing" Ashli Babbitt from behind - or at least blocking her withdrawal from the broken glass doors. She tried to back out of the broken door, but Gadsden Man had her pinned.

Between the hat, the well groomed face, the build, I said to myself FED.

Dobbin

 

[marsh]

NEW FOOTAGE Shows Ashli Babbitt Punched Violent Rioter Who Was Breaking Windows In The Face Just Seconds Before She Was Shot Dead (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Julian Conradson

On Tuesday, The Epoch Times released never before seen footage of Ashli Babbitt that provides even more insight into what happened before she was shot and killed by Capitol Hill Police Officer Mike Byrd.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

NEW FOOTAGE Shows Ashli Babbitt Punched Violent Rioter Who Was Breaking Windows In The Face Just Seconds Before She Was Shot Dead (VIDEO)

By Julian Conradson
Published January 25, 2022 at 5:20pm

On Tuesday, The Epoch Times released never before seen footage of Ashli Babbitt that provides even more insight into what happened before she was shot and killed by Capitol Hill Police Officer Mike Byrd.

Once again, the latest video directly contradicts the fabricated narrative that Babbitt had been acting as a violent insurrectionist, and even supports the evidence that was released last week that showed she was attempting to stop two violent instigators from smashing the windows leading into the Speaker’s lobby.

In several new screenshots that were released last week by investigative reporter Tayler Hansen, Babbitt can be seen yelling at the men who were smashing the windows just seconds before she was killed by Lt. Mike Byrd in cold blood.

New Photos Show Ashli Babbitt Tried to Stop Protesters from Entering Pelosi's Lobby -- Was Shot Dead by Lt. Mike Byrd in Cold Blood Moments Later | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Photos by Tayler Hansen via Epoch Times New footage by investigative reporter Tayler Hansen reveals Ashli Babbitt attempted to stop protesters from violently entering the Speaker’s Lobby on January 6, 2021.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

For several minutes before she was shot, Babbitt fought to stop bad actors from smashing up the Capitol. She also shouted at police guarding the doors leading to the Speaker’s lobby to call for backup.

In the latest previously unseen footage that was recorded by InfoWars reporter Sam Montoya, Babbitt was so incensed at a man for breaking out the windows that she delivered a left hook straight to his face when he refused to stop.

The violent rioter, Zachary J. Alam, was repeatedly smashing the glass with a black riot helmet when Babbitt shouted at him to “Stop it!”

After he finished busting out two panes of glass, Babbitt knocked him in the nose, sending his glasses askew.

Just seconds later, Babbitt climbed through the open window, which is where Byrd pulled the trigger, murdering her in cold blood.

Watch:

Rumble .26 min

According to the Epoch Times, Babbitt’s punch likely saved Alam’s life, as witnesses claimed that they believed he was preparing to climb through the opening himself before Babbitt intervened.

Once Alam saw what happened to Babbitt, he can be seen running out of the frame.

The Epoch Times also spoke with Ashli’s husband, Aaron Babbitt, who explained that the video provides even more vindication about her actions, and, most importantly, reveals crucial details about what happened that day.

From The Epoch Times:

“‘As we keep seeing these videos and it’s all coming into play and it’s literally laying out everything I’ve said from day one, that she’s a good person, that she loved this country, she was law enforcement, pro-law enforcement, wasn’t breaking anything, didn’t hurt anybody—we’re seeing it now,’ Babbitt told The Epoch Times.”

Aaron Babbitt even called this video the missing piece of the puzzle and declared that “we will get to the bottom of” this horrific incident.

“‘That was a missing piece of the puzzle that just puts it all together,’ Aaron Babbitt said of the video. ‘It shows what we’ve been saying all along based on my interpretation of what’s going on in that room.’

‘I could see the distress on her face. I could see her yell at the cops.’
‘We’re going to get to the bottom of it. We’re going to get it out there.'”

Well now it’s out, and, yet again, the Feds have some explaining to do.
In light of the new recording, Aaron Babbitt is confident that his wife did nothing wrong and that she had tried to escape the hostile situation, where she was pinned down in the hallway, by going through the window to try and get to safety.

She was completely boxed in, he explained.

“Babbitt said the new video reinforces his belief that his wife saw the open window as her only escape from the mayhem. A SWAT team was at the top of the stairs behind her, and the rest of the hallway was packed with demonstrators.

‘I think she just realized she was in a bad spot, something wasn’t right. It didn’t smell right,’ Babbitt said. ‘She had her wits about her. The frustration came out when she punched him in the face, because he deserved it. He deserved it from a man, not the little woman there in that small hallway.'”

Justice for Ashli and her loved ones must be had.

 

[marsh]

Kerik told Jan. 6 panel that former Army colonel came up with idea to seize voting machines

Previously, Phil Waldron was best known for circulating a 38-page PowerPoint presentation that urged Trump to declare a state of emergency in the wake of the election.

www.politico.com

Kerik told Jan. 6 panel that former Army colonel came up with idea to seize voting machines
Previously, Phil Waldron was best known for circulating a 38-page PowerPoint presentation that urged Trump to declare a state of emergency in the wake of the election.

Bernard Kerik enters a courthouse for a hearing on October 20, 2009 in White Plains, New York. | Getty Images

By BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN
01/24/2022 05:44 PM EST

A former member of President Donald Trump’s legal team told the Jan. 6 committee that former Army colonel Phil Waldron first came up with the idea of Trump issuing an executive order to seize voting machines, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Earlier this month, Bernie Kerik — who worked with Rudy Giuliani on Trump’s legal efforts to find evidence of voter fraud — told the select committee that Phil Waldron originated the scheme, which would almost certainly have been illegal.

A person familiar with Kerik’s testimony, who was not authorized to discuss it publicly, described it in detail to POLITICO.

Last week, the select committee obtained a copy of a draft executive order written for Trump. The order, which Trump did not issue, would have directed the Defense secretary to seize voting machines. It also would have given the secretary 60 days to write an assessment of the 2020 election — a timeline that would have expired a month after Biden’s inauguration day. POLITICO published the text of the draft order last week.

Waldron is best known for circulating a 38-page PowerPoint presentation that urged Trump to declare a state of emergency in the wake of the election, as The Washington Post has detailed. That presentation found its way into the inbox of Mark Meadows while he was White House chief of staff. Meadows passed the presentation to the select committee last year, and his lawyer has said Meadows did nothing with it. Waldron has said he briefed members of Congress on the findings detailed in the presentation, including claims about voter fraud.

Kerik and Waldron both worked with Giuliani on Trump’s post-election outside legal team. POLITICO could not independently confirm Kerik’s claim to the committee about Waldron and the voting machines, but Waldron is a key focus of the committee. On Dec. 16, the committee subpoenaed him for documents and testimony, citing the PowerPoint presentation. Kerik’s testimony to the committee came after investigators issued the subpoena.

In his voluntary interview with the committee, Kerik also called the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol “counterproductive,” according to the source. Kerik indicated that the riot eliminated any hope he and his team had of getting government authorities to take their fraud allegations seriously.

Additionally, Kerik discussed friction regarding Trump attorney Sidney Powell, as well as financial frustrations. He noted that he struggled even to get reimbursement for his stays at the Willard hotel, and that he was paying for his lawyer out of his own pocket.

 

[Dobbin]

That presentation found its way into the inbox of Mark Meadows while he was White House chief of staff. Meadows passed the presentation to the select committee last year, and his lawyer has said Meadows did nothing with it.

And neither did Trump.

A leader would be remiss if he does not consider the alternatives. In order to consider alternatives, one must GENERATE alternatives first.

We don't even know if Trump knew of this particular proposal. It might have been shelved before it ever met Trumps eyes.

Additionally, Kerik discussed friction regarding Trump attorney Sidney Powell, as well as financial frustrations. He noted that he struggled even to get reimbursement for his stays at the Willard hotel, and that he was paying for his lawyer out of his own pocket.

Others have spoken about the fact that post election the RNC controlled the purse-strings of the Trump Campaign, and Kerik was not the only Trump supporter left "stranded" by an RNC who was more than happy to settle for a Trump Loss and financially "obstructed" any reasonable investigation of election fraud.

Dobbin

 

[marsh]

**HUGE BREAKING NEWS** -- Wisconsin Assembly Votes to Advance Rep. Ramthun's Resolution to Reclaim Wisconsin's Electors For President and Vice President That Were Certified Under Fraudulent Purposes -- VIDEO | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

**HUGE BREAKING NEWS** — Wisconsin Assembly Votes to Advance Rep. Ramthun’s Resolution to Reclaim Wisconsin’s Electors For President and Vice President That Were Certified Under Fraudulent Purposes — VIDEO

By Jim Hoft
Published January 25, 2022 at 8:11pm

Rep. Tim Ramthun

The Wisconsin Assembly voted unanimously in a voice vote in a privileged resolution to move forward Rep. Ramthun’s resolution to reclaim Wisconsin’s 10 electors for US President and Vice President who were certified under fraudulent purposes.

The voice vote was unanimous and passed the assembly earlier this evening.

The legislation will now move forward to the Wisconsin Rules Committee and to the Wisconsin Senate, bill 743.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Timothy Ramthun.

How it happened: Rep. Ramthun bravely called for a point of order today, during an open session. He did this by using Assembly Rule 43 and asking was his resolution privileged and able to be passed on to the Rules Committee through an open session? Yes, the resolution was privileged. Then they were able to do a vote within the session that was currently taking place. And it was all “Yes”, an unanimous vote to move the legislation to the Rules Committee. So now the resolution will land at the Rules Committee. It’s in the hands of Speaker Vos, a Republican. So Speaker Vos and the rest of the representatives have ten days to answer back on whether he’s going to push it to the floor for a vote. It is not clear what the Wisconsin Senate did with it yet.

Representative Ramthun used the rulebook, used the Constitution, and was fearless. He went out there in front of everybody, stopped the session and said, I’m a legislator, and I want you to hear this because that’s what the constituents are asking me to do.

The assembly voted on the resolution to have passage to the Rules Committee, to get an opinion if they can go forward. They could have tabled it. They didn’t even have to hear it. But because it was found privilege, they had no choice. And now the legislation moves to the Rules Committee.

So now the legislation moves to the next level, it’s still alive, and we’ll see what happens in the Rules Committe led by Robin Vos. It’s not a done deal, but it’s the first time in Wisconsin history that a state Representative has moved to reclaim Wisconsin’s 10 electoral ballots.

Ramthun’s office is kicking butt and needs to be supported and thanked for doing the right thing for the people of Wisconsin and America. Regardless of where the resolution goes from here, Representative Ramthun has always kept his word to the people of Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Assembly Rules Committee Members:
Representative Steineke (Chair)
Representative Vos
Representative August
Representative Petersen
Representative Vorpagel
Representative Kuglitsch
Representative Tittl
Representative Plumer
Representative Dittrich
Representative Neubauer
Representative Hesselbein
Representative Spreitzer
Representative Subeck
Representative Pope
Representative Baldeh

How can you help? Contact the rules committee members and tell them to put the resolution through.

You can reach your legislator by calling the Legislative Hotline. In Madison, dial 266-9960. Toll-free, call 1-800-362-9472.

** We will be updating this post as we learn more. This post has been updated as we gathered more information from our many sources.

Here is video of tonight’s historic vote in the Wisconsin Assembly.

Rumble video 5:03 min

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Alex Jones pleads the fifth 100 times before J6 committee…
Posted by Kane on January 25, 2022 9:50 pm

View: https://youtu.be/TRTIFJcQGt8
2:50:24 min

Alex Jones met virtually on Monday with the House committee investigating the January 6 breach, he announced on his broadcast. A source familiar with the investigation confirmed the meeting.

“I just had a very intense experience being interrogated by the January 6 committee,” Jones said on his broadcast on Monday. “They were polite, but they were dogged.” Jones said that, by his lawyer’s count, he had pleaded the Fifth Amendment “almost 100 times” and that he had been told to do so “on advice of counsel.”

Jones said that while he had wanted to answer the questions, he was afraid to do so because he believes that the committee, specifically Adam Schiff of California, would twist his words, and Jones said he had been afraid of not answering all questions correctly and potentially perjuring himself.

“The questions were overall pretty reasonable. And I wanted to answer the questions, but at the same time it’s a good thing I didn’t, because I’m the type that tries to answer things correctly even though I don’t know all the answers, and they can kind of claim that that’s perjury.”

Jones said he had been shown “a bunch of emails” that he had not seen before. He also said he believes that the committee has gotten access to his phone because he was shown text messages with January 6 rally organizers Cindy Chafian and Caroline Wren, who also have been subpoenaed by the committee.

On his show, Jones shared that the panel had asked him repeatedly who his White House contact was to help with rally planning and organizing. Jones said that Caroline Wren, a major fundraiser for the Donald Trump campaign, was his contact for rallies on January 5 and 6.

Jones suggested that Wren was with a group of officials at the Ellipse on January 6 who led him “to the back of the stage so we could then go and get around the crowd and go lead the march.” Jones said he had sought to direct people to a spot near the Capitol where organizer Ali Alexander planned to hold a permitted rally. He said he did not support people going into the Capitol, which he called “so stupid and so dumb.”

In its subpoena letter to Jones, the committee cited news reports and his own statements to make the connection between Jones, Wren and Chafian and said the three worked toward “facilitating a donor, now known to be Julie Fancelli, to provide what (he) characterized as ‘eighty percent’ of the funding” for the rally on the Ellipse.

The committee stated that Jones had been denied a speaking spot at the January 6 rally but that his previous comments indicate he had been designated to “lead a march to the Capitol, where President Trump would meet the group.” Jones said on Monday that it was the belief of those at the Capitol that Trump was going to join them in some capacity after his speech at the Ellipse on January 6.

Jones said he heard from witnesses to the committee that Trump had told his then-chief of staff, Mark Meadows, that he wasn’t going to meet his supporters at the Capitol but could drive by or fly over the crowd with a helicopter because he had done that at other large events.

Jones also relayed on Monday that the committee had asked him whether he had heard of any plans for violence. Jones said the only talk he had heard about possible violence was through news reports and that he was not privy to any insider information. He described it as “background noise” that you “always hear about politics in America.”

He denounced any suggestion that he had been involved in the planning of violence at the Capitol. “Let’s get something clear for the committee and my audience and everybody else: I don’t want a civil war in this country, and that’s a terrible idea. And I don’t want lawlessness by anybody. And I don’t want anybody attacking anybody.”

The committee’s subpoena to Jones referenced comments from a guest host on his program on December 31, that seemed to foreshadow the riot. “We’re going to only be saved by millions of Americans occupying the entire area, if necessary storming right into the Capitol,” the host Matt Bracken told viewers.

Jones condemned those comments that had been made on his show, claimed he hadn’t heard them before he had received the subpoena and said, “Quite frankly, I was shocked by it.”

Jones also shared that he had learned that the committee listens to his show almost every day.

Jones, referring to the indictment of Rhodes on seditious conspiracy charges, said that if the Oath Keepers were attempting to foment a violent rebellion, it’s not something he knew about or desired. The committee acknowledged specifically in its subpoena to Jones that once at the Capitol, he had told people “not to be violent” and to gather and wait for Trump to speak.

On his show, Jones said he had tried to discourage people from entering the Capitol but described containing the crowd as “mission impossible. We learned there were a bunch of people inside the Capitol,” Jones said.

“And that was so stupid and so dumb. I didn’t support it that day and I don’t support it now. We got the hell out of there once we couldn’t stop it,” Jones added, calling January 6 a “horrible historic fiasco” and saying he wished it had “never happened.”

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Confusion over Wisconsin vote to recall electors… Speaker Robin Vos promised to kill the bill…
Posted by Kane on January 25, 2022 11:19 pm

Rumble video 5:07 min
Here’s the problem. The vote was largely ceremonial because now it is in the hands of Speaker Robin Vos, a republican who has publicly condemned Ramthun and the effort to recall Wisconsin electors.

Vos warned last week he wouldn’t advance the bill

MADISON – The Republican leader of the state Assembly placed sanctions on one of his members who has for more than a year claimed President Trump won the 2020 election in Wisconsin and has proposed legislation to pull back Wisconsin’s electoral votes, which the Speaker says is impossible.

Speaker Vos told reporters — “There are some who believe — there’s one who believes — that we somehow have the right (to withdraw electoral votes) even though every lawyer that we have worked with in Wisconsin says we cannot undo the 2020 elections, “ Vos said. “You know, Rep. Ramthun has that belief.

That’s his right. But I think that what we’re focusing on is not the past. We are looking at the past to learn from it.”

[COMMENT: Vos and his ilk are obviously "never Trumpers" who need to be removed from power.]

 

[marsh]

Did the Justice Department Lie About Pence and Harris’ Location on January 6? › American Greatness

Of the more than 725 Americans arrested so far for various crimes related to the Capitol protest on January 6, 2021, nearly every defendant faces the same two misdemeanor charges: “entering and…

amgreatness.com

Did the Justice Department Lie About Pence and Harris’ Location on January 6?

January 6 is a tissue of myths, cover-ups, manufactured hysteria, and outright lies.
By Julie Kelly

January 24, 2022

Of the more than 725 Americans arrested so far for various crimes related to the Capitol protest on January 6, 2021, nearly every defendant faces the same two misdemeanor charges: “entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds” and “disorderly conduct in a restricted building or grounds.”

The basis for the offenses is not, as the American people repeatedly have been told, that the building was closed to the public that day. After all, hundreds of people were allowed inside as Capitol police stood by; no signage or official announcements alerted the public that the building was off-limits.

Instead, the Justice Department has argued that the presence of both Vice President Michael Pence and incoming Vice President Kamala Harris rendered entry into the Capitol on January 6 a federal crime under 18 U.S. Code section 1752. In every charging document, the government relies on section 1752 to define a “restricted building” as the location of the “President or other person protected by the Secret Service,” which would have included Pence and Harris.

For example, the initial indictment for Florida resident Howard Adams twice claimed that “the Vice President and Vice President-elect were temporarily visiting” the building that afternoon, which is why Adams was charged in May with two criminal counts under section 1752.

But a superseding indictment issued by prosecutors in December made a major correction to Adams’ case: the new filing omitted the term “Vice President-elect.”

Why? Because Kamala Harris was not in the Capitol when Adams or any protester entered the building on January 6.

Politico recently revealed the Justice Department’s false allegation after a prosecutor had to inform Beryl Howell, the chief judge of the D.C. District Court handling every Capitol breach case, during a sentencing hearing that her claim Harris needed to evacuate the Capitol building on January 6 was untrue.

“Assistant U.S. Attorney Jamie Carter chimed in to say that the government had ‘recently learned’ that Harris was not actually present when the Capitol was breached,” Politico reported in November. (It’s unlikely Howell took a break from berating Capitol trespassers to reprimand the government for repeatedly misleading the court about Harris’ whereabouts on that January 6.)

Updated indictments in many cases reflect the subtle but significant change.

So, why did it take so long for the Justice Department to fess up? After all, Harris has publicly admitted that she wasn’t at the Capitol on the afternoon of January 6, 2021. “It’s unclear why DOJ included the erroneous information in the first place and continued to do so for months,” Politico reporters Josh Gerstein, Kyle Cheney, and Christopher Cadelago wrote. “Published reports as early as mid-January, including interviews that Harris gave as she prepared to make history as the first female vice president, indicated she was not present in the Capitol during the insurrection (sic).”

But Kamala Harris’ actual location on January 6 is even more explosive, so to speak. Politico reported in a separate article last month that the then-senator and incoming vice president was at the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee at the same time an alleged pipe bomb was discovered outside the building on January 6. A timeline produced by Capitol Police, obtained by Politico, confirmed that Harris was at the DNC offices in Washington and had to be evacuated around 1:15 p.m. when the device was discovered by law enforcement.

Officials with the Capitol police, including former chief Steven Sund during his congressional testimony, never disclosed that alarming fact, which makes the unresolved crime of the January 6 pipe bombs all the more astonishing. (Another alleged pipe bomb was found near the Republican National Committee headquarters right before 1 p.m. Both buildings are just east of the Capitol.)

Whoever set the alleged explosive devices not only endangered the lives of nearby lawmakers and the public but the life of a sitting U.S. senator and incoming vice president. One would assume, given the urgent security threat the pipe bombs posed that day, law enforcement would be a little more vigilant in tracking down the still-unidentified perpetrator or perpetrators. That doesn’t seem to be the case.

Despite the Justice Department’s recent confession, numerous existing indictments still include the inaccurate claim; D.C. judges, including Chief Judge Howell, seem unbothered by the fact federal court documents—and, more importantly, evidence presented to a grand jury—include an entirely false allegation about the events of January 6.

It now appears that the Justice Department also fibbed about the whereabouts of Mike Pence. For over a year, the government has stated in every criminal complaint that Pence stayed in the building the entire day. “Vice President Pence remained in the United States Capitol from the time he was evacuated from the Senate Chamber until the sessions resumed.” (Pence was evacuated at 2:20 p.m.; the joint session reconvened at 8:00 p.m.) That claim has been included in government motions seeking pretrial detention for dozens of January 6 defendants.

But evidence that Pence remained in the building for nearly six hours is murky at best—and the Justice Department is changing its story as the first jury trials get underway.

Couy Griffin, the Cowboys for Trump leader charged with both section 1752 misdemeanors, wants proof Pence was in the Capitol; Griffin’s trial is set for March 21. His lawyer asked the court to compel production of pictures taken by a White House photographer that clearly contradict the government’s allegations, prompting the Justice Department to once again backtrack. Now, prosecutors want to argue that entry was a crime because Pence was coming back to the Capitol.

“18 U.S.C. 1752(a)(1) and (2) criminalizes a person entering a restricted area ‘of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting.’” [Original emphasis.] “18 U.S.C. 1752 does not require the Secret Service protectee to be present on the grounds or in the building where the restricted area has been established at the time of an illegal entry into the restricted area. Therefore, the Vice President’s presence in an underground parking garage or tunnel does not exculpate the Defendant with respect to the charged conduct,” Janani Iyengar, an assistant U.S. attorney, wrote on January 18.

But of course it does—not only does it exonerate Griffin, who never entered the building, but hundreds of Americans charged under the same premise.

Further, the Justice Department insists it does not have the photographs, which were obtained by ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl. “The photographs requested by the Defendant from the official White House photographer are not in the government’s possession, therefore, they are not considered Brady [material] and the Defendant cannot move to compel their production,” Iyengar wrote to the court.

And that’s not the only way the Justice Department is attempting to conceal Pence’s exact location for nearly six hours on January 6. Prosecutors also have asked the court to strictly limit the cross-examination of Secret Service witnesses and prohibit defense attorneys from asking agents about “the location within the Capitol or its grounds to which the Vice President and his family, or their motorcade, were taken once the riot began on January 6, 2021.”

Any public disclosures about Pence’s exact location, prosecutors argue, would jeopardize national security. In another major goal post shift, prosecutors say the burden of proof for the government only is to show that the defendant entered “building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting.”

A central question remains: Was Pence in the Capitol building, as the Justice Department has repeatedly claimed, or not? Is it yet another fabrication intended to exaggerate what happened?

January 6 is a tissue of myths, cover-ups, manufactured hysteria, and outright lies. As I predicted in my book, January 6: How Democrats Used the Capitol Protest to Launch a War on Terror Against the Political Right, the truth gradually will be revealed as trials get underway this year. Exposing the Justice Department’s intentional falsehoods about Kamala Harris and Mike Pence is just the start.

 

[marsh]

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer

https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer%2Frigging-2022-and-2024-what-the-democrats-are-doing-right-now View: https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer/rigging-2022-and-2024-what-the-democrats-are-doing-right-now
53:50 min


^^^^^
https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer%2Fstate-police-and-agencies-when-they-go-out-of-control View: https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer/state-police-and-agencies-when-they-go-out-of-control
53:50 min


******
https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer%2Fwhy-politicians-pay-for-corruption-and-corruption-pays-politicians View: https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer/why-politicians-pay-for-corruption-and-corruption-pays-politicians
53:50 min



*******

 

[marsh]

Judge Napolitano on the Possible Motivations for the Deep State Infiltration of Jan 6th 1:22 min

Judge Napolitano on the Possible Motivations for the Deep State Infiltration of Jan 6th
The Water Cooler Published January 24, 2022

 

[marsh]

Gateway Pundit: ERIC is a Voter Registration Drive Disguised as Voter Roll Clean-Up 2:28 min

Gateway Pundit: ERIC is a Voter Registration Drive Disguised as Voter Roll Clean-Up (Jeff Crouere)
RealAmericasVoice Published January 24, 2022

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Sounds like DOJ wants to charge Rudy Giuliani with criminal intent…
Posted by Kane on January 26, 2022 3:35 pm



DOJ examines slates that offered Trump electoral votes in states Biden won in 2020

Federal prosecutors are examining the decision by Republican electors in some states won by Biden in 2020 to send in signed statements purporting to affirm Donald Trump as the victor of the election, a top Justice Department official said Tuesday. They have drawn additional scrutiny in recent weeks, as the House J6 committee seeks to understand the origin of the Trump elector slates, and two Democratic attorneys general, in New Mexico and Michigan, have asked federal prosecutors to investigate whether the certifications could amount to a crime.

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco confirmed prosecutors’ consideration of what she termed the “fraudulent elector certifications. We’ve received those referrals. Our prosecutors are looking at those, and I can’t say anything more on ongoing investigations,” Monaco said.

The groups in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin — all states that had officially approved Biden electors — acted publicly in mid-December 2020. They said they were adopting a tactic used by Democrats in Hawaii decades ago in hopes that some later court decision might make their meaningless votes actually count. Republicans in Pennsylvania and New Mexico also sent certificates, but those documents explicitly stated that they were to be considered only if the election results were upended.

The breadth of federal prosecutors’ review was not immediately clear. Nor was it clear whom they might be targeting or what crimes they might be considering.

The electors were aided in their effort by Trump campaign officials and Trump attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, who said publicly that the rival slates were necessary and appropriate. Former campaign officials and party leaders, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations, have said that Giuliani oversaw the effort behind the scenes.

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment Tuesday on when prosecutors began looking into the matter, whom they were targeting or even if they were conducting a full-fledged investigation, rather than just assessing referrals from state attorneys general.

Lynsey Mukomel, a spokeswoman for Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) said in an email on Tuesday: “Our department still has an open investigation and we will continue to cooperate with the federal authorities as we pursue parallel efforts.”

Nessel had said previously that prosecutors “took the information that was provided,” and her solicitor general had spoken with the acting U.S. attorney in the Western District of Michigan. She said she hoped officials would discuss the matter with those at the Justice Department in D.C. and “ensure that this is going to be taken seriously by Attorney General Merrick Garland and those who are working on any of these issues related to the 2020 election.”

New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas said in a statement on Tuesday: “I am pleased the DOJ is looking into this matter, as these disturbing allegations require that federal authorities partner with state law enforcement agencies across the country to ensure integrity in the election process.”

Monaco “did not go into detail about what else prosecutors are looking at from the partisan attempt to subvert the 2020 vote count.” But, she noted: “More broadly, look, the attorney general has been very, very clear. We are going to follow the facts and the law, wherever they lead, to address conduct of any kind and at any level that is part of an assault on our democracy.”

SOURCE

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Monster thread from Liz Harrington…
Posted by Kane on January 26, 2022 1:55 pm

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486032341210480645

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1486032341210480645
.37 min

Trump spox Liz Harrington put together a very deep dive on drop-box election fraud.
Read the full thread here…

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Speaker Vos "Refused to Say" Whether He Supports Election Drop Boxes - That Were Just Ruled Illegal in the State | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Wisconsin Speaker Vos won’t say if he supports legalizing election drop boxes after President Trump’s message over the weekend.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Speaker Vos “Refused to Say” Whether He Supports Election Drop Boxes – That Were Just Ruled Illegal in the State

By Joe Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 7:00am

Wisconsin Speaker Vos won’t say if he supports legalizing election drop boxes after President Trump’s message over the weekend.

Wisconsin Speaker Vos who supported drop boxes in the 2020 Election was caught over the weekend secretly pushing for more drop boxes in legislation being developed for this year’s Wisconsin legislature.

After President Trump discovered Vos’s actions he contacted Vos.

We reported on Sunday that Speaker Vox in Wisconsin was secretly pushing for more election drop boxes in his state. These things are magnets for fraud as anyone can drop anything in them and get away with it. President Trump shared our article below three times in his daily statements to his millions of followers since Sunday.

Wisconsin Speaker Vos Is Secretly Pushing Legislation to Increase Number of Drop Boxes After Judge Ruled Them Illegal in State | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Wisconsin’s Republican Speaker Vos is trying to push a bill through Wisconsin’s Senate that increases the number of drop boxes in the state. This is after a judge recently ruled that they are illegal in the state. BREAKING: Waukesha County Judge Deals HUGE BLOW to Democrats — Bans Use of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Today the local media in Wisconsin asked Speaker Vos about this development.

Channel 3000 reported today:

Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos refused to say Tuesday whether he would support legalizing absentee ballot boxes in the battleground state after former President Donald Trump spoke out against it.

Vos in 2020 voiced support for absentee ballot drop boxes while arguing against the collection of ballots in Madison parks by election workers.

On Monday, Trump issued a statement that didn’t name Vos, but said “Some Rino Republicans in Wisconsin are working hand in hand with others to have drop boxes again placed in Wisconsin. Drop boxes are only good for Democrats and cheating, not good for Republicans.”

Since the loss, Republicans have focused on limiting the use of absentee ballot boxes, which saw increased use in 2020 largely due to the pandemic. Wisconsin’s top elections official testified last year that at least 528 drop boxes were used by more than 430 communities in the presidential election.

A draft of the legislation was posted on the conservative website Gateway Pundit on Sunday before Trump issued his statement. Bernier has drawn fire from some conservatives after she criticized Republicans who are pushing conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and how it was run in Wisconsin.

We will be keeping an eye on this legislation. To date, Speaker Vos has prevented thorough audits of voting machines and ballots in the state after he certified the fraudulent results.

 

[marsh]

BREAKING: Arizona Senate Committee Passes SEVEN Election Integrity Bills - Including Ballot Fraud Countermeasures, Ballot Images Will Be Public Records | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Seven critical election integrity bills were passed by Republicans on the Arizona Senate Government Committee Monday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Arizona Senate Committee Passes SEVEN Election Integrity Bills – Including Ballot Fraud Countermeasures, Ballot Images Will Be Public Records

By Jordan Conradson
Published January 26, 2022 at 7:30am

New Arizona Ballot Prototype

Seven critical election integrity bills were passed by Republicans on the Arizona Senate Government Committee Monday.

The Arizona audit discovered evidence of over 700,000 ballot discrepancies and law violations that occurred during the 2020 Presidential Election, and the Arizona Legislature is working to secure elections in 2022 and beyond. Many in the legislature look to recall the fraudulent 2020 Presidential and Vice Presidential Electors this session.

The audit is still ongoing, but The Arizona Senate delivered election-changing evidence of fraud to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich four months ago. Arizona anxiously awaits the results of his criminal investigation.

The Gateway Pundit reported on the call to action days before the Government Committee considered twelve bills, eight of which passed and will now move to the Senate floor after additional hearings.

URGENT CALL TO ACTION! Critical Election Reform To Be Considered On AZ Senate Floor: Bills Make Ballot Images Public Record and Ballot Currency-Grade Fraud Countermeasures | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Monday is a big day in the Arizona Senate for election integrity.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

After The Gateway Pundit reported on the meeting, Patriots filled the room to show their support for election integrity and request to speak on the newly proposed bills.

The brand new election security measures received loud rounds of applause.

Attendees of the meeting were asked to do “jazz hands” instead of clapping to keep order in the meeting room.

Trump-endorsed Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake was also there to speak on a bill.

On Monday, The Senate Government Committee voted yes on SB1008, SB1009, SB1012, SB1013, SB1054, SB1119, SB1120, SB1133.

Seven bills passed concentrated on elections. The remaining bills were rescheduled for the committee due to time.

The newly passed legislation covers recount margins, adds currency grade fraud measures to ballots, makes ballot images public records, prevents elections by mail, and fights illegal voters using the “federal only” loophole.

Republicans on this committee outnumbered Democrats 4:3, and every bill passed on party lines. Democrats did not vote for a single election integrity measure.

If passed in full, SB1119 and SB1120 will make ballot images available to voters and require ballots to be printed with ballot fraud countermeasures. These bills are designed to make elections fully transparent with an auditable trail of secure ballots.

The Gateway Pundit reported on these election integrity measures unveiled by Arizona State Representative and Trump-endorsed candidate for Secretary of State Mark Finchem.

Arizona Senate Majority Whip Sonny Borrelli introduced these bills in the Senate.
Ballots do not contain voters’ personal information, and they will remain anonymous but publicly available for the 22-month record retention period under SB1119. “We vote in private, but we count in public, and your ballot is a public record, and it should be made that transparent,” said Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli.

Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake also commented on this bill, saying,

Lake: I’m going to be on the ballot, and I’m worried about what happened to President Trump happening to me and others, Democrat and Republican. And I urge you to support this bill and any other bill that would shore up our elections.

SB11120 will require counties to use standardized ballots with 19 different security features, including a holographic design and watermarks. The new ballots will also have QR codes that enable voters to track their votes using a smartphone.

The bill will standardize the ballots and make it easier to audit the vote.

The Arizona Senate-led audit of Maricopa County discovered that the County used ten different paper types in the 2020 election. Ballots should be standardized in a way that cannot be replicated.

The estimated cost is a mere 25 cents per ballot.

Democrats voted no on these bills citing bandwidth and price concerns.

Free and fair elections are priceless.

Rumble video 6:59 min

^^^^

 

[marsh]

Retiring GOP RINO Chairman of WI Rules Committee Jim Steineke Says "Zero Chance I Will Pass" Representative Ramthun's Resolution to Decertify 2020 Election Results | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Yesterday, Representative Timothy Ramthun rocked the Wisconsin House by proposing a resolution to have the 2020 Election results in the state decertified because of the massive fraud in the state. The legislation to reclaim Wisconsin electors was advanced to the Rules Committee.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Retiring GOP RINO Chairman of WI Rules Committee Jim Steineke Says “Zero Chance I Will Pass” Representative Ramthun’s Resolution to Decertify 2020 Election Results

By Joe Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 8:00am

Yesterday, Representative Timothy Ramthun rocked the Wisconsin House by proposing a resolution to have the 2020 Election results in the state decertified because of the massive fraud in the state.

The legislation to reclaim Wisconsin electors was advanced to the Rules Committee.

Before the night was over, corrupt Republican Representative Jim Steineke already announced there is no way he will approve the resolution.

TGP reported yesterday that Wisconsin Representative Ramthun is working for the people of Wisconsin and America in getting to the bottom of the 2020 Election results that were certified in the state. Ramthun introduced a resolution in Wisconsin which is now being forwarded to the Wisconsin Rules Committee.

**HUGE BREAKING NEWS** -- Wisconsin Assembly Votes to Advance Rep. Ramthun's Resolution to Reclaim Wisconsin's Electors For President and Vice President That Were Certified Under Fraudulent Purposes -- VIDEO | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Immediately following the unanimous voice vote and before The Gateway Pundit even reported on the bill, ‘Republican’ Representative Jim Steineke tweeted that there was no way he was going to advance the resolution out of the Rules Committee where he is the chair. Steineke is a realtor, not a constitutional attorney.



Hat tip Midnight Rider

Steineke has announced he would not be running for re-election. No doubt because he knew he was going to get primaried out. It will be interesting to see what Speaker Vos and the rest of the committee do.

Wisconsin Assembly Rules Committee Members:
Representative Vos
Representative August
Representative Petersen
Representative Vorpagel
Representative Kuglitsch
Representative Tittl
Representative Plumer
Representative Dittrich
Representative Neubauer
Representative Hesselbein
Representative Spreitzer
Representative Subeck
Representative Pope
Representative Baldeh

How can you help? Contact the rules committee members and tell them to put the resolution through.

You can reach your legislator by calling the Legislative Hotline.

In Madison, dial 266-9960. Toll-free, call 1-800-362-9472.

Speaker Vos can be contacted using the below links:

TWITTER: https://twitter.com/SpeakerVos?s=20
FACEBOOK: Wisconsin State Representative Robin Vos
INSTAGRAM: Speaker Robin Vos (@speakervos) • Instagram photos and videos
EMAIL: rep.vos@legis.wisconsin.gov
PHONE: 608-266-3387 & 608-266-9171
MAILING ADDRESS:
State Capitol
Room 217 West
PO Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708

145,000 ballots all for Joe Biden dropped on Election night giving the senile old man a 20,000 vote lead in the state and the Wisconsin Legislature voted to certify those results. To date efforts to investigate the voting machines and ballots in the state have been blocked. This was a travesty and all of America knows it.

 

[marsh]

Kachelman: When the Rule of Law Unravels | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by John Kachelman, Jr.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Kachelman: When the Rule of Law Unravels

By Jim Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 9:15am

Guest post by John Kachelman, Jr.

In “Sweet Home Alabama” I was raised to expect accountability for stupidity. Of course, many wish to evade personal culpability for their actions. But one’s “feet are held to the fire” and accountability is unexcused. People still try to evade their actions. They project their uncivil, criminal and self-centered actions onto others trying to justify what they have said and done. But it does not “hold soap.”

So, downhome simple language tags them with the idiom, “Bit dog hollers first and loudest!” These folks are “called out” for their arrogant attempts to dodge the evil they have fostered. There is eventual accountability even when the arrogant attempt to excuse themselves of their dastardly deed.

The idiom “bit dog hollers first and loudest,” was instantly associated with a comment made by Liz Cheney (23 January 2022): “A former Speaker of the House is threatening jail time for members of Congress who are investigating the violent January 6 attack on our Capitol and our Constitution. This is what it looks like when the rule of law unravels.”

Here is the female application of “a bit dog hollering first and loudest.”

This is an incredible statement voiced with a delusionary arrogance. The audacity of her tagging the truthful words of Speaker Gingrich as unraveling the Constitutional “Rule of Law” is shocking. She refuses to see her “rule of law” unraveling in the Burn Loot Murder riots; in the trashing of constitutional freedoms; in the onerous “mandates” used to control and dictate to the population; in the uncivil actions of the national governing Body; and a myriad of other actions that “unravels” the true Rule of Law (the U.S. Constitution)! Incredulous! Shocking! Unbelievable! My immediate response was, “Did she really say this?”

It is IGNORANCE of history and IDIOCITY of speech that is openly displayed by Cheney’s comments. The unraveling of the Rule of Law MEANS (in her delusional mind) the unraveling of HER rule of law and not the unraveling of the Constitutional Rule of Law!

Look how history exposes her arrogance. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was quoted in The Observer, December 29, 1974: “In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State.” Typical of the courageous Solzhenitsyn was his insight into the tyranny of totalitarians. It is remarkable how accurate his observation applies to today’s national governing.

Another historic anecdote exposes not only the actions of Cheney, but the overwhelming majority of DEMS/REPUBS in the U.S. Congress. We are observing the revival of Stalin’s tactic called “psychological projection” or blame-shifting. A politician publicly accusing his opponents of what he himself is guilty. Pay close attention to how this political maneuver is evident in the political tyranny emanating from Washington, DC. In Communism: A History, Richard Pipes aptly describes how Stalin used a government fabricated crisis–which he blamed on his opponents–as an excuse for the government to seize more power:

“Stalin’s regime needed another crisis … as Fidel Castro, the leader of Communist Cuba, would explain … ‘The revolution needs the enemy … The revolution needs for its development its antithesis’ … And if enemies were lacking, they had to be fabricated … In 1934, a prominent Bolshevik, Sergei Kirov, the party boss of Leningrad, was assassinated under mysterious conditions … evidence points to Stalin … Kirov was gaining too much popularity in party ranks for Stalin’s comfort.

… His assassination brought Stalin two advantages: it rid him of a potential rival and provided a rationale for instigating a campaign against alleged anti-Soviet conspirators …”

Derek Landy has well said, “The lies we tell other people are nothing to the lies we tell ourselves.”

The eminent satirist Jonathan Swift astutely commented on Political Lying by saying, “Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect.”

The troubling reality of Cheney’s “rule of law unraveling” will ultimately be exposed but by that time “the tale hath had its effect.” The cowardly silence of the national POLS will be chronicled, but the damage will have been done. To the reigning POLS who remain silent and cowering when evil lies are nationally broadcast, I ask, “What is better: uncomfortable truth or comfortable lies?” The general positioning of the REPUB leadership and caucus evidences their surrender to the flagrant lies.

The lies multiply…within days of Cheney’s arrogant “psychological projection” came a number of published articles illustrating the absence of integrity in the national governing Body. I am including the links and urge the reader to read the articles that expose the shenanigans that now characterize the “Ruling Elite” in Washington, DC.

First read an article published 23 January 2022 but took place in March 2021: Biden DROPS All Charges Against Antifa from Big League Politics. “The federal Department of Justice has dismissed cases for 31 ANTIFA thugs who were charged with crimes related to rioting in Portland, OR. Four defendants who were charged with felony assault of a federal officer had those charges dropped. More than half of the charges were ‘dropped with prejudice,’ meaning that those cases cannot under any circumstances be brought up again in court…The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is claiming that there is ‘no intelligence’ indicating that ANTIFA had a role in fomenting riots that have gripped the country.” Is this not amazing? The Burn Loot Murder/ANTIFA walk free leaving in their wake billions of dollars in destroyed property and lives evilly taken by racism. BUT the J6 protesters who are unconstitutionally imprisoned, because of the political purge, are locked up and the cell keys (along with the Constitutional protections of life, liberty and justice) are thrown away!

Second an article published 24 January 2022: The curious case of Ray Epps. Discusses the J6 instigator who led efforts to storm the US Capitol but for some strange reason has never been indicted or investigated by the FBI and the Biden regime. Ray Epps was a “cut-out” — an operative working for the FBI. Democrats used the “whistleblower,” Eric Ciarramella, in the Trump impeachment scam as the cut-out for their source, like Vindmann, who was on the Ukrainian call with President Trump. Once again, the specter of Stalin’s psychological projection is exposed.

Third, an exceptional Gateway Pundit article was published 24 January 2022 reporting the evil of Fauci‘s Bombshell E-Mails: “He bears full responsibility; he should be held liable,” wrote Richard Abelson. This lengthy article is a MUST-READ. The emails reveal the evil intent of Fauci and his morally bankrupt storm troopers. “Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Peter Daszak, Jeremy Farrar and others involved in ‘Gain of Function’ research at the Wuhan Lab conspired to quash any investigation into the true origins of the Covid-19 outbreak and their culpability.”

Again, he noted: “The explosive thing is that they make it very clear that we are dealing with a massive cover-up of the origin of the Covid pandemic…From the e-mail correspondence, it appears that there was collusion, coordinated by Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins and Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust.”

This report validates a document proving virologists actually planned and applied for experiments that have the potential to be a genocide-level event.
And then this shocking conclusion: “I know from conversations with American colleagues that the intelligence agencies commissioned by President Joe Biden did not really investigate at all.”

One wonders how Cheney’s “unraveling rule of law” perceives and judges this diabolical scheme?

Political lies are more advanced and cherished than truth. Agatha Christie’s, Murder on the Orient Express has the master Belgian detective Hercule Poirot announcing: “Lies—and again lies—it amazes me, the amount of lies we had told to us this morning…I shall select each passenger in turn, consider their evidence and say to myself, ‘If so and so is lying, on what point are they lying and what is the reason for the lie?’” As usual, Poirot asks the right question. Listen to him again, “If so and so is lying, on what point are they lying and what is the reason for the lie?”

Fourth published 24 January 2022 at The Gateway Pundit: Dr. Peter McCullough Urges Public Against ‘Genetic Vaccines’ That Cause Dangerous Spike Proteins ‘In The Brain, Lungs, The Heart, Bone Marrow, Reproductive Organs.’ It is by Alicia Powe and is an EXCEPTIONAL read. It is an interview with an American internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster throughout the pandemic. He urged the public to abstain from additional Covid vaccination. You will NOT read this in the malicious false media outlets. I urge you to read it carefully. Here is the true science truth that is ignored by the lying POLS:

“For the genetic vaccines, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca, there is no known detoxification methods. Sadly, the genetic material lasts in the body far longer than what we thought and the spike protein that’s produced is probably in the body for greater than a year and it’s in vital areas, including the brain, the lung, the heart, the bone marrow, the reproductive organs. And it takes a very long time for the body to clear out this dangerous, foreign, protein. The only thing I can advise individuals is, don’t take any more of it. There is going to be a progressive accumulation of spike protein in the human body that cannot get out. It will almost certainly lead to chronic disease.”

And a more disturbing point: “Not only are Covid vaccines hazardous and deadly, but hospitals across the United States are dangerously adhering to new Covid protocols that are a death sentence for Covid-infected in-patients.”

A truism that has been erased in today’s political speech states: “More important than finding the truth–is finding the reason why one needs to lie.”

Previous articles have discussed the psychological manipulation that leads to a dependency upon the State-sponsored “mandates.” This in turn is bolstered by “bald-faced lies.” The ambitious appetite of the POLS and false scientists forcing their tyranny upon the population is fueled by power and money!

However, the truth will be revealed; evil lies will be exposed. We are at the beginning of this process and it will continue until justice is thoroughly rendered. Those being exposed will become furious and attack. Their evil cannot be rationalized with the vocabulary changes and pious phrasing “This is what it looks like when the rule of law unravels.” This is not only the “bit dog hollering” but it portrays idiomatically the discomfort experienced “by a whore in a church house.” And again, “the chickens are coming home to roost.”

Will the United States of America salvage its personal freedom, exceptionalism and constitutional integrity from the lying politicians? Will there arise a courageous “Solzhenitsyn” who dares proclaim: “In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State.”

 

[marsh]

UPDATE: WI Rep Ramthun's Resolution is Packed with Facts Showing a Corrupted Election - Rules Suggest His Resolution May Not Be Dead in Committee | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Yesterday, Wisconsin Representative and American hero Timothy Ramthun proposed a resolution in the WI House calling for the decertification of the corrupt 2020 Election results for President Trump and Vice President Pence in that state. The assembly voted unanimously to move forward Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

UPDATE: WI Rep Ramthun’s Resolution is Packed with Facts Showing a Corrupted Election – Rules Suggest His Resolution May Not Be Dead in Committee

By Joe Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 11:45am

Yesterday, Wisconsin Representative and American hero Timothy Ramthun proposed a resolution in the WI House calling for the decertification of the corrupt 2020 Election results for President Trump and Vice President Pence in that state.

The assembly voted unanimously to move forward Rep. Ramthun’s resolution to reclaim Wisconsin’s 10 electors for US President and Vice President who were certified under fraudulent purposes.

The resolution in itself is damning and some reports is damning in nature.

**HUGE BREAKING NEWS** -- Wisconsin Assembly Votes to Advance Rep. Ramthun's Resolution to Reclaim Wisconsin's Electors For President and Vice President That Were Certified Under Fraudulent Purposes -- VIDEO | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Below is Ramthun’s resolution which is seven pages filled with accusations of fraudulent activities related to the 2020 Election. When read by an independent and objective observer, this resolution is DAMNING. Here is only one paragraph in the resolution:

Whereas, at its December 8, 2021, public hearing, the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections heard testimony from expert analyst Jeff O’Donnell, who found a multitude of irregularities when he analyzed data from the Wisconsin voter rolls, including that 93.7 percent of active voters participated in the 2020 general election, 205,355 voter registration applications were dated November 3, 2020, 957,977 individuals registered as new voters in 2020, 45,665 voters who registered did not have matching Division of Motor Vehicle records, 22 percent of active voters registered in the 6 months leading up to November, 3, 2020, 31,872 of those voters who registered in that 6-month period are now listed as inactive, and 42,000 voters who voted in the November 3, 2020, election are now listed as inactive; and Here is the entire resolution.

WI Ramthums Election Resolution to Decertify by Jim Hoft on Scribd (Scribd doc on Website)


Download this PDF

Below is a video of the event on the House floor:
Rumble video 5:07 min

But as soon as the resolution was addressed by the House, the RINO House Rules Committee Chair, Rep. Steineke tweeted that the resolution would never get past his committee.

Retiring GOP RINO Chairman of WI Rules Committee Jim Steineke Says "Zero Chance I Will Pass" Representative Ramthun's Resolution to Decertify 2020 Election Results | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Yesterday, Representative Timothy Ramthun rocked the Wisconsin House by proposing a resolution to have the 2020 Election results in the state decertified because of the massive fraud in the state. The legislation to reclaim Wisconsin electors was advanced to the Rules Committee.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

But hold on. Last night several individuals went through the Wisconsin State Legislature Assembly Rules and discussed some rules in the Wisconsin State Assembly that indicate this resolution may not die in the Wisconsin Rules Committee.

Rule 43 (1) on privileged resolutions states the following:

Any resolution or joint resolution relating to the officers, members, former members, procedures, or organization of the assembly or legislature is privileged in that it may be offered under any order of business by a member who has the floor and may be taken up immediately before all other proposals, unless referred by the presiding officer to a standing committee or to the calendar.

From the video, it looks like the resolution was referred to the Rules Committee. assuming that is a standing committee then that appears proper. However, according to online discussions, Rule 61 also addresses rules of privilege.
Rule 61 states the following – Note (6):

Assembly Rule 61. Questions of privilege. Questions of privilege are under the immediate control of the presiding officer and the assembly.

Such questions pertain to the rights, integrity, and safety of the assembly collectively, to the rights, reputation, or conduct of members of the assembly in their representative capacity, or to the conduct of government in general.

(1) “Assembly privilege”: With recognition by the presiding officer, any member may raise and discuss a question pertaining to the safety, dignity, decorum, comfort, rights, organization, or officers of the assembly that requires immediate attention.

(2) “Personal privilege”: With recognition by the presiding officer, any member may rise to explain a personal matter that affects the rights, reputation, and conduct of the member in his or her representative capacity. A pending question may not be discussed in the explanation.

(3) “Special privilege”: Any member desiring to make a statement on a matter other than one of assembly or personal privilege may rise and, with recognition by the presiding officer and within any time limits determined by the presiding officer or the assembly, may discuss any subject relative to state or local government, the conduct of public officials in relation to their official duties, or other matters concerning the public welfare, or any question pertaining to the rights of the assembly collectively, its safety, dignity, or the integrity of its proceedings.

(4)
(a) A member may raise a question of assembly or personal privilege at any time. Questions of assembly privilege take precedence over questions of personal privilege and both take precedence over all other questions except a motion to adjourn, a call of the assembly, a motion to lift a call of the assembly, or a motion to recess.
(b) Questions of special privilege may not be raised when any matter is under consideration by the assembly.

(5) Questions of assembly or personal privilege have precedence only insofar as they require immediate consideration and are not dilatory.

(6) Once a question of privilege is before the assembly, it is subject to debate and to all proper motions. When the question of privilege has been disposed of, the business of the assembly is resumed at the point at which it was interrupted.

Red Arrow Patriot shared the following on Telegram – related to Ramthun’s resolution:

…in a livestream (BAND REUNION W/ Behizy, CannCon, Julie Green, Marcus Dee, & Neil Johnson!) discussion tonight, Marcus Dee pointed out that if Ranthum’s resolution fails to get traction in [the Rules] Committee, he may be able to introduce an amended version of the resolution to the Assembly and call for a floor vote. “We’d need 13 RINOs to change their minds,” Marcus says. “But at least we’d know where everyone stands,” Behizy added.

It looks like there may be strong arguments preventing crooked RINOs from burying this resolution.

Wisconsin Assembly Rules Committee Members:

Representative Vos
Representative August
Representative Petersen
Representative Vorpagel
Representative Kuglitsch
Representative Tittl
Representative Plumer
Representative Dittrich
Representative Neubauer
Representative Hesselbein
Representative Spreitzer
Representative Subeck
Representative Pope
Representative Baldeh

How can you help? Contact the rules committee members and tell them to put the resolution through.

You can reach your legislator by calling the Legislative Hotline.
In Madison, dial 266-9960. Toll-free, call 1-800-362-9472.

Speaker Vos can be contacted using the below links:
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/SpeakerVos?s=20
FACEBOOK: Wisconsin State Representative Robin Vos
INSTAGRAM: Speaker Robin Vos (@speakervos) • Instagram photos and videos
EMAIL: rep.vos@legis.wisconsin.gov
PHONE: 608-266-3387 & 608-266-9171
MAILING ADDRESS:
State Capitol
Room 217 West
PO Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708

 

[marsh]

EXCLUSIVE: AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Is Working on Resolution to Reclaim Arizona's 2020 Electors: "I Actually Have A Resolution In Markup Right Now." (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Wisconsin General Assembly voted on Tuesday to advance Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE: AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Is Working on Resolution to Reclaim Arizona’s 2020 Electors: “I Actually Have A Resolution In Markup Right Now.” (VIDEO)

By Jordan Conradson
Published January 26, 2022 at 8:39pm

The Wisconsin General Assembly voted on Tuesday to advance Rep. Tim Ramthun’s resolution to reclaim the 2020 electors for President and Vice President who were certified under fraudulent purposes.

The Gateway Pundit reported on this huge breaking news yesterday.

**HUGE BREAKING NEWS** -- Wisconsin Assembly Votes to Advance Rep. Ramthun's Resolution to Reclaim Wisconsin's Electors For President and Vice President That Were Certified Under Fraudulent Purposes -- VIDEO | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Arizona Legislature is also drafting new laws to secure elections and following Wisconsin’s lead on the 2020 election.

Arizona State Representative and Trump-endorsed candidate for Secretary of State Mark Finchem told The Gateway Pundit that he is already working on a five-page resolution to reclaim Arizona’s electors. “We have a mountain of evidence,” said Finchem, and more is being delivered to Attorney General Mark Brnovich daily.”

The Gateway Pundit reported that The Arizona Senate Government Committee recently passed seven sweeping election security measures.

BREAKING: Arizona Senate Committee Passes SEVEN Election Integrity Bills - Including Ballot Fraud Countermeasures, Ballot Images Will Be Public Records | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Seven critical election integrity bills were passed by Republicans on the Arizona Senate Government Committee Monday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The Gateway Pundit correspondent Jordan Conradson spoke to Rep. Finchem about new election laws, Arizona’s fraudulent electors, and his upcoming event in McAllen, Texas.

Finchem revealed that he is working on a resolution to reclaim Arizona’s 2020 electors!

Finchem: Well, I actually have a resolution in markup right now. We are dotting our T’s, crossing our I’s. We just want to make sure, I mean, this is historic. It doesn’t happen very often. In fact, in the history of our nation, this has not happened more than just a handful. of times over the entire 250 plus years.

Here in Arizona, we have a mountain of evidence, in fact, the resolution that I’m putting together right now we have five pages, and that is growing because more evidence is being turned over to our attorney general’s office. It’s beyond clear and convincing.

I was just reviewing some of the case law that supports the duty of the legislature to act. We have a duty. It’s not an option. It’s a duty.

The mountain of evidence was delivered to Attorney General Brnovich four months ago and Arizona tirelessly awaits the results of his investigation and the ongoing audit of the election routers.

MUST SEE: Arizona Senate President Karen Fann Gives Exclusive Update On Maricopa County Router Audit - AZ Attorney General Has Pulled Numerous People For Questioning | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Arizona Senate-led audit of Maricopa County’s 2020 election discovered over 700,000 ballot discrepancies, internet connectivity on the elections system, and moreelections law violations.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand justice.

Contact Arizona Legislators and demand a yes vote to reclaim Arizona’s fraudulently certified 2020 electors.

Rumble video 14:08 min

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Attorneys File Emergency Motion to Bypass Appeals Court and Their Decision to Delay Banning of Drop Boxes for Feb. Primary | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Michael Bohren issued a summary judgment decision earlier this month on January 13th banning ballot drop boxes in the state.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Attorneys File Emergency Motion to Bypass Appeal’s Court and Their Decision to Delay Banning of Drop Boxes for Feb. Primary

By Jim Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 6:49pm

Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Michael Bohren issued a summary judgment decision earlier this month on January 13th banning ballot drop boxes in the state.

Judge Bohren also ruled ballot harvesting was illegal in the state.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) issued memos to Wisconsin clerks in March and August of 2020 encouraging their use, stating that absentee ballots do not need to be mailed by the voter or delivered by the voter, in person, to the municipal clerk but instead could be dropped into a drop box. According to WEC, ballot drop boxes can be unstaffed, temporary, or permanent.

This advice was contrary to state law.

Joe Biden won the state after a stunning drop of Biden-only ballots in the middle of the night following the election.

On Monday a state appeals court stayed Judge Bohren’s restrictions on the use of absentee ballot drop boxes.

This allows the drop boxes to be in place for the February primary.

On Wednesday the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed an emergency motion to bypass, asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), a case to determine the legal status of absentee ballot drop boxes and ballot harvesting. The case is currently on appeal at the Court of Appeals, District IV, which issued a temporary stay of a Waukesha Circuit Court decision that will allow the use of absentee ballot drop boxes for the February 15 primary election. WILL also requested the court vacate this stay.
Will-Law.org reported:

The Quote: WILL President and General Counsel, Rick Esenberg, said, “Wisconsin voters, candidates, and election officials deserve certainty on the legal methods to cast an absentee ballot. We are hopeful the Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear this urgent matter.”

Background: WILL filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Waukesha County voters in June 2021 challenging the legal status of absentee ballot drop boxes after WEC issued unlawful guidance to clerks, in 2020, encouraging the use of absentee ballot drop boxes, and telling voters that others can return their ballot for them.

This advice was contrary to state law. Voting is a constitutional right, but state law makes clear that, “voting by absentee ballot is a privilege exercised wholly outside the traditional safeguards of the polling place.” There are just two legal ways in Wisconsin to submit an absentee ballot. When voting by absentee ballot, state law says “[t]he envelope [containing the ballot] shall be mailed by the elector, or delivered in person, to the municipal clerk issuing the ballot or ballots.”

On January 13, Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Michael Bohren issued a summary judgment decision that held that WEC’s guidance on absentee ballot drop boxes violates state law, and/or should have been adopted through the rulemaking process in Chapter 227. Further, Judge Bohren made clear that state law provides just two legal methods to cast an absentee ballot: through the mail or in-person at a clerk’s office.

 

[marsh]

DOMINION ON THE ROPES: Lawyers for Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell Say They Are Open to Settlement with Dominion "After Discovery Is Complete" -- As Dominion Files Suit to Block Audit in PA | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The lawyers for Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell announced their clients were open to a settlement with Dominion Voting Systems after their discovery requests are complete.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

DOMINION ON THE ROPES: Lawyers for Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell Say They Are Open to Settlement with Dominion “After Discovery Is Complete” — As Dominion Files Suit to Block Audit in PA

By Jim Hoft
Published January 26, 2022 at 5:30pm

The lawyers for Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell announced their clients were open to a settlement with Dominion Voting Systems after their discovery requests are complete.

Dominion sued Powell, Rudy, and Mike Lindell for $1.3 billion for accusations they say damaged the company.

But Dominion won’t let anyone inspect their machines or systems. They blocked any investigation of their machines in Arizona. They refused any legitimate inspection in Georgia. And Dominion currently has a lawsuit against Pennsylvania County auditors to prevent them from looking at their machines.

Dominion says it’s because any audit will damage their machines. Really? If this is true why would any county in the US use their product? They should immediately be disqualified.

Watch Dominion refuse any discovery in their case against Rudy, Mike, and Sidney.

It won’t happen.

Business Insider reported:

Dominion Voting Systems said this week in a court filing that there was no “realistic possibility” that it would settle its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit with MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and the pro-Trump lawyers, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell.

The company made its position clear in a new filing Monday night as part of the company’s lawsuits against the trio for pushing an array of conspiracy theories about the election-technology company’s role in the 2020 election.

“Given the devastating harm to Plaintiffs, the lack of remorse shown by Defendants, and the fact that many of them continue to double down on their lies, Plaintiffs do not believe any realistic possibility of settlement exists,” lawyers for the company wrote in the filing.

In the same filing, lawyers representing Powell and Giuliani reiterated their positions that their claims about Dominion’s role in the election didn’t meet the legal standard for defamation.

“Powell and Giuliani are open to settlement discussions once discovery is complete and Dominion realizes that its claims are without merit and that it has no damages legally attributable to Powell and Giuliani,” the filing said. “Powell and Giuliani have nothing to show remorse for and dispute that they have lied about anything.”

The claims were made in a joint filing in which the parties proposed a schedule to US District Judge Carl J. Nichols, who is overseeing Dominion’s array of defamation lawsuits, to move the cases forward. In August, Nichols denied attempts from Powell, Giuliani, and Lindell to dismiss Dominion’s lawsuits against them. He later consolidated the case so they would move to trial together.

HOT Wisconsin added: “Dominion never had a case in the first place. They filed to direct the attention at the defendants calling them conspiracy theorists. Now they’re in a real court case and discovery is looming. Now they’re looking to settle by saying they can’t settle.”

 

[marsh]

https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer%2Fwinning-in-wisconsin-what-are-the-findings-and-facts View: https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer/winning-in-wisconsin-what-are-the-findings-and-facts?si=8b881ceac4674974aa902b2dbdf67d3a&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing
53:50 min



^^^^

https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer%2Fballot-harvesting-ballot-cracking-ballot-laundering-ballot-trafficking-how-its-done View: https://soundcloud.com/jovanhuttonpulitzer/ballot-harvesting-ballot-cracking-ballot-laundering-ballot-trafficking-how-its-done?si=8b881ceac4674974aa902b2dbdf67d3a&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing
53:50 min

 

[Dobbin]

HOT Wisconsin added: “Dominion never had a case in the first place. They filed to direct the attention at the defendants calling them conspiracy theorists. Now they’re in a real court case and discovery is looming. Now they’re looking to settle by saying they can’t settle.”

"Put up or shut up."

Dominion attempt at "We'll threaten them with BIG numbers" didn't work.

Methinks its going to get REAL QUIET with the Dominion Lawsuits. The Democrats (who owe Dominion a LOT of money) - are going to say to them "you want to get paid what we owe? Then DUMMY UP."

Democrats have a lot more to lose in the theater of public opinion should full discovery occur. And they have other means to defend the vote, ethically or non-ethically, going forward. Dominion is but one cog in a machine of deceit.

I can see an enjoinder along the lines of "neither party will reveal publicly details of the Dominion Machines or the election" - but a court decision comes down to a single verdict: either guilty or not-guilty. And this would be the 'tell.'

And might be one VERY damaging to the Democrats.

Dobbin

 

[marsh]

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers Drops 88 Bills: "We Are Going Back to In-Person One Day One Vote NO MACHINES And Paper Ballots With Watermarks" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers has already proposed 88 bills for the 2022 legislative session, including legislation to ban machine counting in elections.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers Drops 88 Bills: “We Are Going Back to In-Person One Day One Vote NO MACHINES And Paper Ballots With Watermarks”

By Jordan Conradson
Published January 27, 2022 at 8:15am

Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers has already proposed 88 bills for the 2022 legislative session, including legislation to ban machine counting in elections.

On Monday, Senator Rogers tweeted a link to view 75 proposed laws. Already, that number has grown.



One of these bills, SB1133, will ban a city, town, or school from conducting mail-in elections. On Monday, this bill passed through the Senate Government Committee with six more new elections laws, including currency-grade ballot counterfraud requirements.

BREAKING: Arizona Senate Committee Passes SEVEN Election Integrity Bills - Including Ballot Fraud Countermeasures, Ballot Images Will Be Public Records | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Seven critical election integrity bills were passed by Republicans on the Arizona Senate Government Committee Monday.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Senator Rogers tweeted that 70 election integrity bills have been proposed in the Senate so far.



On Tuesday, Rogers announced another critical election security bill via press release. This bill will require elections to be counted by hand and ban electronic tabulating equipment.

Tuesday, January 25, 2022
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

In an effort to restore election integrity and to make sure all legal votes in Arizona are counted for, Senator Wendy Rogers (R-6) is introducing legislation that aims to get rid of automated voting machines.

SB 1348 would prohibit the use of electronic or other tabulating equipment and would require all ballots to be counted by hand for any and every state, county, city or town election.

Furthermore, neither the Secretary of State, the Board of Supervisors, nor any other officer in charge of elections shall allow the use of electronic or other tabulating equipment. Ballots would be counted by hand only and required to remain segregated by precinct, both before and after counting.

“An alarming number of voting machines are vulnerable to hackers,” said Senator Rogers. “These systems aren’t reliable and don’t have any credibility. We need to make bold moves to guarantee that every vote is accurately counted. We owe this to the people of Arizona. Even just a dozen votes can make or break a race. In order to improve the security of the ballot and election integrity, we need to move from machines to human hand counts.”

To quote American columnist and author William Vaughan, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.” SB 1348 returns to an election system that every American can understand: hand counting. With complicated voting systems comes complicated vulnerabilities that can be difficult to detect.

Arizonans deserve a voting system they can both understand AND trust. SB 1348 returns us to this.

Former Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes, who facilitated the shady, corrupt 2020 election, recently said that “AZ must go 100% ballot by mail.”

Rogers responded by calling him a “crook” and telling him her plans for this session.



The full forensic audit of Maricopa County’s 2020 election provided sweeping evidence that Arizona’s 2020 election was stolen from President Trump, and the Arizona Attorney General has since opened a criminal investigation.

Arizona State Legislators are now fighting to reclaim Arizona’s 2020 Presidential and Vice Presidential electors. Representative Mark Finchem told The Gateway Pundit that he is currently drafting a resolution to recall Arizona’s eleven electors.

EXCLUSIVE: AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Is Working on Resolution to Reclaim Arizona's 2020 Electors: "I Actually Have A Resolution In Markup Right Now." (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Wisconsin General Assembly voted on Tuesday to advance Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Who will decertify first?

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand justice.

 

[marsh]

Judge Forces Trump Attorney to Turn Over 1,500 Pages a Day for Liz Cheney’s Amusement | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

A California judge is forcing Trump Attorney John Eastman to review and turn over at least 1,500 documents a day in the Democrat Party’s continued harassment and abuse of the opposition party.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Judge Forces Trump Attorney to Turn Over 1,500 Pages a Day for Liz Cheney’s Amusement

By Jim Hoft
Published January 27, 2022 at 11:15am

A California judge is forcing Trump Attorney John Eastman to review and turn over at least 1,500 documents a day in the Democrat Party’s continued harassment and abuse of the opposition party.

Eastman, a staunch Trump supporter, is a major target of the communist left in their ongoing attempt to crush their opponents and send a message to the people of America. NO dissent will be allowed.

Liz Cheney and her committee members must be very pleased.

Eastman was outspoken in his belief that the 2020 election was stolen from the most popular president in American history. Trump recorded more votes by a sitting President in a national election. A majority of Americans to this day believe the election was decided by fraudulent means.

Via Newsmax:

A federal judge Wednesday night ruled that former President Donald Trump’s lawyer must review at least 1,500 pages of records per business day and immediately transfer any unprivileged documents to the House Jan. 6 committee.

Judge David Carter, of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, ordered attorney John Eastman to begin producing pages to congressional investigators beginning Friday, Politico reported.

Any documents Eastman deems privileged must be given to Carter. If the committee challenges the lawyer’s claim, the judge will review the records to determine whether the assertion was valid before holding a hearing to adjudicate the privilege disputes.

Carter earlier rejected Eastman’s attempt to block the committee’s subpoena for 19,000 pages of emails held by his former employer, Chapman University. Eastman has claimed that many of the emails relate to his legal clients and therefore be subject to potential attorney-client privilege.

The Wednesday night ruling showed that Carter is taking a more hands-on approach than any federal judge so far to assist the Jan. 6 select committee’s effort to access specific documents from a reluctant witness.

 

[marsh]

Hansen: Capitol Offense - The Ugly Truth Behind The Five Deaths From January 6th and 7th | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Article was written by Tayler Hansen, originally published at taylerhansen.substack.com.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Hansen: Capitol Offense – The Ugly Truth Behind The Five Deaths From January 6th and 7th

By Jim Hoft
Published January 27, 2022 at 3:09pm

Article was written by Tayler Hansen, originally published at taylerhansen.substack.com.

Over a year has passed since January 6th, 2021, or as MSM would call it the “Deadly Insurrection”, took place at the United States Capitol. Up until now, the most important but confusing questions have been:

• Who killed who?
• How did it happen
• Why did it happen?

We have the answers, and our team has accumulated thousands of hours in forensic video analysis to back it up.

The general public has become increasingly frustrated with the lack of transparency and fake investigations. The January 6th committee has proven themselves to be completely inept in revealing the truth. As a remedy for this, a team of Independent Journalists, myself, David Sumrall, and others have finally cracked the code behind what truly took place on January 6th, 2021. Be sure to have a trashcan handy before reading, as the truth behind January 6th will make you sick to your stomach.

Since the evening of January 6th, 2021, our team has been gathering information and videos, interviewing witnesses, and relentlessly studying video footage from our cameras, what we’ve collected, and from thousands of hours of unconfiscated footage submitted by the public and those who were there on January 6th.

The January 6th Committee can shove their 14,000 hours of “classified” footage where the sun doesn’t shine because Americans around the country have stepped up in supplying all the evidence we need to bring the truth to light.

Follow closely as we explain in detail each of the five deaths from January 6th and 7th. We will show you how the Government, Capitol/MPD (Metropolitan Police Department) Police specifically, were responsible for all five deaths, and how they conspired to hide the truth from the public.

Consider as you read, the effects these actions have had on individuals, families, communities, and the way our citizens interact with one another on a daily basis.

There has been a major lack of accountability from USCP and MPD surrounding these deaths, yet unlimited resources have been allocated for the January 6th Unselect Committee to paint a narrative that couldn’t be farther from the truth.

Death #1 – Benjamin Phillips
Pictured: Benjamin Phillips

Benjamin Phillips had moved with the crowd to the West side of the Capitol by the scaffolding next to the stairs. They were peacefully protesting and addressing their grievances (also known as exercising their Constitutionally protected 1st amendment rights) while pleading with Capitol Police to remain peaceful. Shouts from the crowd can be heard pleading, “Please don’t gas us, please don’t shoot us” as the Police positioned themselves with pepper ball guns. Ignoring the pleas, the Police began to randomly shoot into the crowd.

The first grenade was thrown deep into the peaceful protesters. They continued improperly throwing concussion grenades into the crowd of people chanting “USA, USA”. At this moment, the police officially began their assault on Protesters and you could feel the atmosphere change. Following the initial crowd munition exploding, four of the first grenades can be seen and heard on video in under 30 seconds.

One of those grenades struck Benjamin Phillips which stopped his heart, caused him to collapse, and ultimately took his life.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1427397396066144265

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1427397396066144265
.29 min

The video below captures when the first initial grenade hit the crowd and their reactions to it directly afterward. The initial crowd munition blew up just feet away from Phillips. Directly afterward, multiple grenades were thrown even deeper into the crowd and the surrounding areas.

View: https://youtu.be/27Fci99hGww
.48 min

Up until this point, the protest had not yet been declared an unlawful assembly meaning no announcement had been made to clear the area. Inspector General, Michael A Bolton called out the Capitol Police for the agency’s inadequacy in preparation. Bolton also referenced that the Civil Disturbance Unit was ordered NOT to use concussion grenades on the crowd that day.

In an exclusive quote given to Tayler Hansen’s Substack, Chris Alberts explains what he witnessed:

“When I arrived at the Capitol wall on January 6th after President Trump’s speech, there were already hundreds of people on the grounds. I heard one or two explosions around the base of the southwest steps. You could see the smoke cloud as people were walking down the sidewalk to the grass and to the steps.

As I followed the crowd towards the base of the steps, I noticed a circle of people keeping everyone back. Through the circle, I could see someone on the ground receiving CPR. The person giving the emergency first aid apparently was not having any success in resuscitating the man.

This man was Benjamin Phillips.

From what I could see, it appeared only one cop was controlling the whole crowd, I walked toward him (the cop) and said, ‘I know CPR and can help.’
The cop told me they had it under control.

I replied, “You aren’t even breathing for him, you need to be giving rescue breathing at the same time!”

The cop then told me that they don’t do that anymore.

I asked, “Why?”

“Covid,” was his answer. Cops no longer use emergency breathing measures to help save someone’s life because of a curable cold.

I then informed the officer that I have a CPR face shield in my medical kit for that exact reason.

He asked if I had an “AED” (Automatic External Defibrillator) in my medical kit? I responded that I did not.

He then said that if I wanted to help, I could keep the crowd back until they got medics to escort Phillips out. I found that kinda funny because by this time, the cop was joined by one, maybe two, other officers at the base of the steps. The crowd was actually staying off the sidewalk wondering what was taking so long to get help.

Shortly after turning my back to the Capitol and keeping people from a place they had every right to be at, I noticed the cop I had spoken to about the CPR/AED was hopping on his motorcycle. He drove up the sidewalk over to the medics who were lined up on the side of the road.

After getting an AED from the medics, the cop then rode his motorcycle back down the sidewalk to where Philips lay, still unconscious.

About 15 minutes after the cop showed up with the AED, some protesters had put Phillips onto a part of metal fencing and started carrying him down the same sidewalk that the motorcycle cop had driven down.

The same sidewalk people stayed off of so that a medical unit could get through to Phillips.

The people carrying Phillips on the fence walked by me. I could see one of the protesters who was walking with them continue performing CPR on Phillips as they walked.

As Phillips was being removed, I noticed about 20 or so riot cops come in to set up a line on the grass adjacent to the side of the sidewalk we were on.

Also at the same time they were carrying Phillips out of the Capitol area, the cops on the top of the steps ramped up the attacks with no warnings at all.

I have never seen that amount of explosive devices, tear gas, and rubber bullets used on any crowd.

No declaration of a riot. No warning. No call to disassemble and leave the Capitol grounds. Just an all-out assault on a crowd of everyday Americans practicing their first amendment rights.”

Witnesses confirm only one officer attempted to provide medical assistance to Benjamin Phillips. After receiving CPR from members of the crowd, protesters eventually carried Phillips out on a section of a barricade and transported him to the ambulance outside of the protest area. Upon reaching this area, one officer can be seen helping carry Phillips alongside protesters. Countless other officers who refused to help are seen standing by and doing nothing.

View: https://youtu.be/9nlmAoq1dio
.10 min

View: https://youtu.be/neA_9xHY9b8
.39 min

One of the factors that led to the successful identification of Phillips was the light blue jeans and shoes with red soles that he wore that day.

See Examples:



Although the Media has put out several conflicting stories about Phillips, one of them being whether he even made it to the Capitol, the video evidence proves the location and the official cause of death at least involved Capitol Police. The real story around Phillips’s death sounds dramatically different than what his friends were told by Police because it is.

There has been a major lack of accountability from USCP surrounding Phillips’s death. Someone needs to be held accountable, you can’t just kill people and blame it on heart disease, twice.

Death #2 – Kevin Greeson

Pictured: Kevin Greeson

The second death by Capitol Police was that of Kevin Greeson. Greeson, like Phillips, also fell victim to the barrage of grenades thrown into the crowd by Capitol Police. Protesters gave Greeson CPR while they attempted to alert the Police that he needed immediate medical attention. In a desperate attempt to save him, the crowd moved his body closer to medical staff on three occasions.

Pay close attention to what the cameraman says, and watch as the crowd tries to help Greeson amidst the confusion of the attack. Protesters, not Police, moved Greeson’s body closer to get him help from the paramedics.

View: https://youtu.be/5Nea9EYOVhU
1:30 min

A Washington Post reporter says:

“As flashbang grenades went off a man in the crowd suffered a medical emergency and then was pulled out to get CPR.”

Translation— A peaceful protester was killed by a concussion grenade thrown by the Capitol Police.

See Video, courtesy of our “friends” at Washington Post.

View: https://youtu.be/bX_EJlF9TKo
.49 min

Mainstream media originally reported on a rumor that Greeson died from tazing himself in his testicles repeatedly.

Independent Fact Checkers condemn this as Fake News.

In an exclusive quote given to Tayler Hansen’s Substack, David Snow details his first-hand account on the 6th:

“I arrived at the circle with David Sumrall around 12:45 PM EST. We waited until the initial rush at the front gate with 1,000 or more people already there by the time I went in to get a better look and to get more video. It seemed like a cross between a movie set and a set-up, ‘pathways’.

I came up to the back of the House of Representatives about 60 feet away from where the crowd was advancing.

Then, the impact grenades started going off all around me. I noticed to my right, some unusual movement. A man collapsed and a protester was administering first-aid. I moved closer to the emergency detail to get him help. The man on the ground seemed to be intentionally getting ignored.

I worked my way back down to check on Greeson, I saw some protesters carrying him off to the left, positioning him on the concrete, and continued to attempt resuscitation.”

Video of Greeson receiving compressions taken by firsthand witness, David Snow, a red arrow marks Greeson receiving compressions:

View: https://youtu.be/m9s_Cu7FzT4
.29 min

Additionally, we have a second quote from another eyewitness. Lauren Witzke details what she saw at the Capitol:

“Almost immediately, the Capitol Police on the ground started throwing flash grenades into to crowds, teargassing us all.

I moved about 40 feet away from the steps, and just stood there, yet the teargas and flash grenades continued. After being flash bombed and tear-gassed for the third time, I looked down beside me to see that a middle-aged man — Kevin Greeson — on the ground, blue in the face.

My friend Kimberley immediately began CPR and continued until her lips were bleeding. But she couldn’t get him breathing again. Men were yelling “Help we need an EMT, get this man an ambulance,” etc.

We begged the Capitol Police Officers for help, but they ignored us and continued macing old men who got anywhere near them.”

The difficulty in identifying the two Capitol Police victims, Phillips and Greeson, was due to the similarities in their location, the time of the attacks, and the appearance of both gentlemen. Phillips has been positively identified as the man wearing the lighter blue jeans and red bottom shoes with red soles, whereas Greeson was wearing dark blue jeans with a leather belt and brown boots.

Recently submitted footage from the public gave us the last details and a different perspective, and with that, we were able to successfully identify the two separate victims.

Greeson’s death is very similar to what happened with Phillips, but the fact that their deaths were both blamed on heart disease, and not at the grenades fired at them, is preposterous.

The Chief Medical Examiner needs to explain his interpretation of heart disease and be held responsible for the misinformation he helped push. His influence spurred a horrific coverup perpetrated by MSM and the Government.

Both Greeson and Phillips died in the initial grenade barrage. The ensuing mass confusion amongst medical personnel as they only attempted to help Greeson and not Phillips. Even as they attempted to help Greeson, they were extremely late to the scene and the Police continued to bombard the crowd with complete disregard for human life, including the EMT personnel sent to retrieve Greeson’s body.

Notice: Kevin Greeson’s dark blue jeans, leather belt, and brown boots.

See Examples
GRAPHIC WARNING:


Part 1 of 3

 

[marsh]

Part 2 of 3

Death #3 – Rosanne Boyland



Pictured: Rosanne (middle) with family
One of the most tragic stories of a victim is that of Rosanne Boyland. The reports around Boyland’s death always refer to acute amphetamine intoxication — in layman’s terms: a drug overdose. In interviews with Boyland’s family members following her death, they revealed that she had been sober for seven years and that she was very proud of her accomplishment.

Conflicting Media reports place her in two different situations which could not take place at the same time. One report says she was standing off by herself when she collapsed in the rotunda; the other says she was actively engaging with police. One story even says that the crowd did CPR on Boyland until they took her to the Police line.

Quite to the contrary, Boyland was beaten unconscious by an MPD Police woman’s stick. Gary Mcbride with M5 News was the first to identify the officer as Lila Morris. The same Lila Morris hailed as a “hero” to the whole nation just weeks later at Super Bowl LV on February 7, 2021. Crazy coincidence, right?


Michael Fanone, Lila Morris, and Daniel Hodges at Super Bowl LV

While Officers sprayed the crowd with chemicals and continued to push protesters on top of each other, the men around Boyland tried to defend her body while others gave her CPR. One man who had tried to resuscitate Boyland was sprayed directly in the face with chemicals.

Metropolitan Police Officer, Lila Morris, is seen brutally beating Boyland repeatedly with what appears to be a wooden walking stick. Morris can be seen swinging from high above her head in a frenzy, with blows like a sledgehammer, expunging any life Boyland may have had left in her body.

See Videos:

View: https://youtu.be/dXHlBKFIOqI
.23 min

View: https://youtu.be/nl0bdZ9IQjI
1:27 min

DC Police Acting Chief Contee says Morris “fought like hell” on January 6th.

For such a tragic and senseless death, the media added insult to injury by stealing the accomplishments Boyland had made in her addiction recovery process. The family is still fighting to clear her name and restore her reputation.


Pictured: Lila Morris


Pictured: Lila Morris’s Helmet Number

Death #4 – Ashli Babbitt



Pictured: Aaron and Ashli Babbitt
Ashli Babbitt’s death was the most documented death by law enforcement that occurred on the 6th. My video from that day has been widely circulated as I was one of the only first-hand witnesses that released the video immediately. The January 6th Committee in their negligence has failed to look into the evidence surrounding the last few minutes of Ashli’s life.

A real investigation would uncover the fact that Ashli was actively trying to de-escalate the situation, plead with the police to get reinforcements, and had no intention of being violent or destructive.

In an exclusive quote given to Tayler Hansen’s Substack, Aaron Babbitt details the kind of person Ashli was.

Ashli was caring, compassionate, and always stood up for what was right. She loved meeting new people and learning their stories. She had a thirst for knowledge of all things in life. She loved life and woke up every day ready to enjoy and take on the day ahead.

In the next video, Ashli and I walk past a Sergeant at Arms employee who is walking calmly and looking at his phone.

You can hear me say “How are you doing today, man?”

He replies “Good, how are you?”.

I’m not sure about you, but if I was in the midst of “defending the Capitol from Domestic Terrorists”, as the narrative goes, I would be on high alert and checking every corner, not texting with no awareness of my surroundings.

Ashli can be seen in my video calmly approaching the doors and briefly attempting to converse with officers.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483566413583376387

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1483566413583376387
.30 min

After reviewing and successfully transcribing my video, you can see Ashli getting frustrated with the inaction from Police regarding Zachary Alam and other agitators, you can hear her yelling “call ****ing help, we’re allowed to be here.”

View: https://youtu.be/GF-85v73LDo
.17 min

After stepping out of the way, officers gave Zachary Alam full access to the glass window pane to the right, which he successfully broke out. This opened the window (literally) for Capitol Police Officer, LT Michael Leroy Byrd to issue the kill shot.

The was no verbal warning from Yetter or Byrd. Yetter appears to have potentially seen Byrd aiming his Glock 22 in the direct line of fire where there were multiple protesters, officers, and the CERT team. Yetter ducked and pushed his fellow officers out of the way moments before Byrd pulled the trigger.

View: https://youtu.be/nPxGSVT_bok
.22 min

Byrd shot Ashli in the left anterior shoulder killing her.

7 seconds prior to Ashli being shot, you can see her grab Zachary Alam by the backpack. She can be seen pulling him towards her and away from the window he just broke. She then lands a left-handed punch (she was a southpaw) on Zachary Alam’s face knocking his glasses off.

Ashli was actively trying to do the job of law enforcement around her and was shot and killed for it.

Ashli Babbitt punched Zachary Alam in an attempt to prevent him from breaching the window, she was shot approximately 7 seconds afterward.



WARNING: GRAPHIC VIDEO

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1346913549898149888

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1346913549898149888
.30 min

The now-famous footage of Ashli Babbitt marching towards the Capitol gives the most accurate representation of her mood that day. She confidently walked towards her final destination with a heart full of resolve, hope, and life. Shortly after that video was filmed, her life would be taken by the only bullet fired that day. That shot was irrefutably fired by Capitol Police Lieutenant, Michael Leroy Byrd.

The overwhelmingly negative response from the public over Byrd’s misconduct has many questioning:

“Who is protecting Byrd?” and “How can Byrd afford expensive Establishment Attorney, Mark Schamel after going bankrupt on two different occasions?”

Since killing Ashli Babbitt, Michael Byrd has since profited over $163,000 on GoFundMe. U.S. Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), who sits on the January 6th Committee also donated to Byrd’s campaign, which is a blatant conflict of interest.

In sharp contrast, GoFundMe targets and removes fundraisers from not only the families of those killed on January 6th, but also from the hundreds of January 6th defendants and their families trying to raise legal defense funds and financial support to survive while being politically persecuted and detained.

 

[marsh]

Part 3 of 3

Death #5 – Officer Brian Sicknick

Pictured: Brian Sicknick

The last death we will cover will enrage not only people on both sides of the political aisle but also law enforcement officers from across the Country. The death of Officer Brian Sicknick was contorted by the Media and the Political Establishment to claim him as their fallen martyr.

When the truth is told, citizens will see that Officer Sicknick is the people’s hero.

The controversy and stories surrounding his death and its origins will help more than any other evidence in proving a conspiracy to hide the truth. The Government and their Pravda media outlets used this deception to shift blame for Sicknick’s death onto innocent protesters and to launch an official impeachment proceeding against President Trump.

They know and have always known, the entire spin of Sicknick’s death is a big lie.

Mainstream Media set the pace for Sicknick’s story based on the information the Government told them to use. The original narrative was that Sicknick was bludgeoned to death, and his head caved in. They said that he was violently murdered by a protester with a fire extinguisher, but that is criminally inaccurate.

Look at the following documents to see how the Media and Government play the “shell game” with the American people, and keep changing their story.

Notice the times on these emails. It seems as if Media declared Sicknick dead before he passed away around 9:30 PM EST, on January 7th. It is beyond obvious now that Mainstream Media used the 24 hours to craft a sickening narrative to best fit their sinister motives.






The only problem with the Medical Examiner’s statement is that the spray did not play a role in Officer Sicknick’s death. The Coroners report stated there was no physical injury to Sicknick’s body internally or externally. There was no collapsed skull, no gash on his head, no bruising or abrasions, and no evidence that any chemicals such as chemical irritants, played a role in his death.

Now, why would they lie?

Chief Medical Examiner Roger A. Mitchell has a problem, and his name is Dr. Lee Schwamm, a stroke expert at Harvard.

See Dr. Schwamm’s statements here:

The spray is extremely unlikely to have caused Officer Sicknick’s strokes. The most likely explanation, was a terrible coincidence of timing when blood clots that occurred for other reasons arose when he was in a terrifying situation.

From what Schwamm says, the first stroke took place during the “terrifying situation”. The other evidence we reference was from the Medical Examiners office, as they provided a timeline leading up to Sicknicks death. A statement says that Sicknick collapses 7 hours and 40 minutes after he was sprayed. Then he died nearly 24 hours after that.

Our investigation revealed several witnesses from the events surrounding Sicknick.

• Rod Taylor, wrote in a statement, that he personally took Officer Sicknick to Police in an attempt to get him help because he felt like Sicknick was suffering from a stroke. The interaction between Taylor and Sicknick happened at around 3:00 PM. Remember, Officer Sicknick collapses around 10:00 PM.
• At approximately 7:30 PM, Chris Alberts, a trained medic, begs police to get Officer Sicknick treatment, as he recognized Sicknick’s condition as being very dire. The Police would not allow Alberts to render medical aid to the distressed officer and told him to mind his own business.

For full witness statements and details regarding Brian Sicknick, redirect to my latest article about his lack of medical treatment:

EXCLUSIVE: First Hand Accounts Allege Officer Brian Sicknick Was Denied Critical Treatment By Police

A few hours after the encounter with Alberts, Sicknick finally collapsed around 10:00 PM as the stroke had already destroyed the parts of his brain that control automated response, meaning he could no longer breathe on his own. Nearly 24 hours later, he died on a ventilator.

This is the part of the story where Chief DC Medical Examiner, Roger A Mitchell and the USCP need to answer some questions.

• Did he actually know that Officer Sicknick had a stroke at that time?
• Why did they pinpoint seven hours and forty minutes based on the time he was sprayed, if the spray did not cause the stroke?
• Why did they not get Sicknick the medical treatment he needed to save his life?
• Why did they disregard Rod Taylor’s plea for medical help?
• Why did they disregard Chris Albert’s later plea and offer of medical treatment for Officer Sicknick?
• Why was the cause and/or manner of death left out when relaying this information to the media?
• Why wouldn’t you admit that Sicknick died of natural causes, instead of blaming his death on the protesters by leaving it in question?
• Why did you lie about each individual death that day?

One last question, for Dr. Mitchell: How many times have you wrongly and criminally put forth or withheld information in pivotal cases?

Our Investigation into Chief DC Medical Examiner, Roger A Mitchell, appointed under Mayor Murial Bowser, is only beginning. We are seeing a terribly alarming pattern regarding his power and influence over medical determinations on the cause of death and manner of death. The last 20 years of Mitchell’s work should be thoroughly investigated for any wrongdoing. Mitchell directly influenced the outcome of the Chauvin trial. In another case, Mitchell accused another Medical Examiner of obvious bias, because the case didn’t end the way Mitchell wanted it to.

Over 700 American citizens have been arrested and/or charged. Some are held in the DC Gulag or various prisons around the country. Some are on house arrest, mostly for petty misdemeanor charges.

From our honest assessment, a good portion of what people see as violence was actually justifiable self-defense. The Prisoners being held by our Government are experiencing the most extreme punishment imaginable. Over a year of mostly solitary confinement, not seeing their families a single time, horrible health conditions, and the most extreme forms of racism, not to mention the urine, feces, or chemical taste to the food. Since January 6th, these people and their families have been living a nightmare that doesn’t seem to be coming to a halt anytime soon.

Just when you think the story couldn’t get any worse, it does.

All five bodies of the Americans who lost their life in DC can no longer be examined.

Why?

In a bizarre, yet unsurprising twist in this story, all five bodies were cremated. All five of the bodies and the evidence they hold were permanently destroyed. It gives shocking new truth to the saying, “dead men tell no tales“.

In the end, January 6th, 2021 is as Biden or Harris have said, “worse than 9/11 or Pearl Harbor” because this attack comes not from a foreign power, but from within our own country.

This is what June 4th is to China. Our Tiananmen Square.

Special thanks to David Sumrall with StopHate.com and the rest of the team for pooling resources and investigations.

Now that you know the truth, what will you do?
To contribute to individual fundraisers for J6th Prisoners and their families you can visit Stop Hate Department Of Defense.
For calls to action, prayer groups, or the mail project click here.
Click either Congressman or Senator for further information to contact your elected officials.
Below will be two separate links under the agency’s name. You can file official complaints or concerns under the name of the select agency.
United States Capitol Police Metropolitan Police Department
Support Independent Investigations

News Tips: TaylerHansen@protonmail.com
Cowritten: David Sumrall
Edited: Tamara Leigh

 

[marsh]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Confusion over Wisconsin vote to recall electors… Speaker Robin Vos promised to kill the bill…
Posted by Kane on January 26, 2022 12:19 am



UPDATE — Bannon speaks to Rep Tim Ramthun
Wisconsin Official Fighting State Electors To Secure Elections 8:49 min

Wisconsin Official Fighting State Electors To Secure Elections (Timothy Ramthun)
Bannons War Room Published January 27, 2022


Wisconsin challenge likely to fail…



Assembly leaders referred the resolution to a committee used to schedule floor votes for bills, a required action for such proposals, and the committee chairman quickly said Ramthun’s resolution won’t be taken up.



“Rep Ramthun just attempted to pass an Assembly resolution to recall WI’s presidential electors. Not only is it illegal, it’s just plain unconstitutional,” Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke, who leads the committee, said in a tweet. “As chair of the Rules Committee, there is ZERO chance I will advance this illegal resolution. #EndofStory”

Rumble video 5:07 min

Here’s the problem. The vote was largely ceremonial because now it is in the hands of Speaker Robin Vos, a republican who has publicly condemned Ramthun and the effort to recall Wisconsin electors.









Vos warned last week he wouldn’t advance the bill

MADISON – The Republican leader of the state Assembly placed sanctions on one of his members who has for more than a year claimed President Trump won the 2020 election in Wisconsin and has proposed legislation to pull back Wisconsin’s electoral votes, which the Speaker says is impossible.

Speaker Vos told reporters — “There are some who believe — there’s one who believes — that we somehow have the right (to withdraw electoral votes) even though every lawyer that we have worked with in Wisconsin says we cannot undo the 2020 elections, “ Vos said. “You know, Rep. Ramthun has that belief.

That’s his right. But I think that what we’re focusing on is not the past. We are looking at the past to learn from it.”