POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Antifa Violent National Autonomous Day of Action Planned – The Kids Won’t Be Quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot

By Tayler Hansen
Published March 3, 2021 at 8:50pm

ANTIFA is planning another day of chaos and destruction. They’re calling it the “Autonomous Day of Action” and it’s scheduled for March 6th.

Rumble video on website .53 min

The video posted is an advertisement for the events on March 6th. The video calls on ANTIFA Worldwide to come together for a day to create, destroy, and cause chaos.

So they’re going to “create” and “destroy” at the same protest! Figure that one out.

The video features ANTIFA carrying out violent attacks against the police with a sound track that is repeating “lynch your leaders“.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1364966555549859841
.59 min

The original video was posted to a twitter account by the name of @FrontGreen

The video was created by @FullAffinity, an ANTIFA Activist who has publicly voiced support for radical acts of violence in order to change the system.

148691313_286003762944587_94699508104631152_n.jpg

EtZX9_PXMAIoVOt-1-992x1024-1.jpeg
Et9YSMwXUAEUZlX-1024x576-1.jpeg


The official advertisement banners for the “Autonomous Day of Action”.
The motto of the event is “The Kids Won’t Be quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot“.

cropped-banner.jpg


On the official website, @FullAffinity provided the following statement:

“We’re calling for an autonomous day of action. A day of creation and destruction. Get organising. Keep it quiet. Keep it serious. Stay safe comrades

6th March. Get in action. **** shit up. Target capitalism. Target the state. Paint your streets. Fight injustice. Squat your local empty. Help the homeless community. Drop some banners. BE GAY DO CRIME!

We want direct action against the system. Anything you can do to attack the state. This March 6th the kids wont be quiet!
WE WILL **** SHIT UP!

The Official website

The Kids Won’t Be Quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot – FSA Call For Day of Action – Green Anti-Capitalist Media
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
Um. Christmas is coming, and the Supreme Court had their chance to weigh in on this matter with the Texas query (joined in by no less than 20 states.)

Sorry. I know the Supreme Court is trying valiantly to keep a "low profile" otherwise they'll be joined by 6 more Justices if they make Nancy unhappy.

It must suck to be them...

Dobbin

Well, if they only got the one shot, they'd best make it count, hadn't they, ole hoss? :D
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MamEjzi0DYY
10:47 min
GOP Rep. exposes Democrats’ latest bill that puts democracy at RISK
•Mar 3, 2021


Glenn Beck


GOP Rep. Boebert has SEVERAL problems with H.R. 1, which she predicts WILL pass in the House. Despite its name, the ‘For the People Act,’ Boebert explains how the bill, which focuses on future election regulations, is ANYTHING but beneficial for Americans. Rather, she explains, it puts democracy at great risk.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aekG_DIZIGM
9:28 min
The revolution's just getting started. Sebastian Gorka on AMERICA First
•Mar 2, 2021


America First with Sebastian Gorka

Sebastian opens the show by talking about how the MAGA movement is far from defeated, and is just getting started.

___________________________________

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJguoAhSlc4
10:34 min
Are you a Trump terrorist? Sebastian Gorka on AMERICA First
•Mar 3, 2021


America First with Sebastian Gorka

Sebastian tears into retired Army General Russel Honore, who has just been appointed by Nancy Pelosi to lead the investigation into the January 6th Capitol protests, despite Honore's long and well-documented history of bigoted statements against Trump supporters.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

More Insanity: House Shuts Down Thursday Session Over Garbage Claims of Pro-Trump Militia Attack

By Jim Hoft
Published March 3, 2021 at 9:47pm
trump-rally-2-1.jpg

Nancy Pelosi shut down the US House on Thursday over the garbage claims of a pro-Trump militia attack.

When was the last time a pro-Trump militia attacked a federal or state facility with guns blazing?
…Never.

When was the last time a Trump militia shot up any facility in America?
…Never.

trump-nuns-good.jpg


The FBI admitted earlier today that not a single protester on January 6th was armed. Not one.

But it doesn’t matter. The Democrats are going to continue to play these fantasy games.
The Capitol Hill police are even increasing security based on their alleged militia plot on the Capitol.


What a great job! Just make up something and call out for the day!

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Passes Sweeping Bill Making it Easier For Democrats to Steal Elections

By Cristina Laila
Published March 3, 2021 at 11:18pm
pelosi-spooked-afraid.jpg

The Democrat-controlled House on Wednesday night passed H.R. 1, a massive elections reform bill making it easier for Democrats to steal elections.

The vote was 220-210.

All Republicans voted “nay.”

The House Democrats previously introduced the “For the People Act of 2021” which will ensure Democrats can count ballots for days and days after an election until they have enough votes to win.

The Democrats used Covid as a vehicle to successfully steal the White House and the Senate (and possibly the House) with ballot harvesting, ballot drop boxes, mail-in ballots and by counting ballots in secret for several days after Election Day in 2020 so now they’re passing legislation to make it easier to steal every election going forward.

The Democrats are making it easier for them to steal elections by automatically registering voters and expanding early and absentee voting.

“This is something that is enormously popular among the American people. The American people want to reduce the role of big, dark, special interest money in politics, which is preventing so many good things from happening. The people want to see an end to voter suppression,” Speaker Pelosi said about H.R. 1 on Tuesday.

The House Democrats passed this legislation as Republican-controlled state legislatures in 28 states have filed more than 100 bills since the 2020 election to prevent Democrat voter fraud.
H.R. 1 will head to the Senate where Democrats have a slim majority with a 50-50 senate and Kamala Harris as the tiebreaker.

Progressives keep pushing to abolish the filibuster since the bill needs 60 votes to advance in the Senate, but Democrat Senators Manchin and Sinema have opposed eliminating the filibuster.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Judge sets first trial date for Capitol riot
Eighteen-year-old Georgia man is scheduled to face D.C. jury on May 10, but timing is tentative.

Trump supporters clash with police and security forces as people try to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.


Trump supporters clash with police and security forces as people try to storm the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. | Brent Stirton/Getty Images
By JOSH GERSTEIN
03/03/2021 01:38 PM EST

A judge has set the first trial date for a defendant in the Capitol riot, scheduling an 18-year-old Georgia man to go before a Washington, D.C., jury on May 10.

Even as he set the date Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Randy Moss indicated that the schedule for the trial of Bruno Cua may not hold for a variety of reasons, including the ongoing coronavirus pandemic that has scuttled trials in federal court in Washington for nearly a year.

“I think everyone realizes this may have to get changed,” Moss said.

The scheduling of the trial is another indication of the challenges looming for the courts in managing the huge surge of cases — more than 300 — stemming from the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6 by a mob seeking to stave off Electoral College proceedings certifying President Joe Biden’s win.

One key factor in whether Cua goes to trial sooner or later is the decision that was the main focus of Wednesday’s hearing: whether he remains in jail as the case goes forward or whether he is released to live at his parents' home in Milton, Ga. If he is sent home, defense attorneys indicated they would agree to a postponement.

Due to the video evidence, plea deals seem likely in many of the cases, but prosecutors are not yet making such offers as the FBI continues to try to figure out the role played by each defendant.

Cua, who is believed to be the youngest person charged in the riot, is accused of assaulting a police officer while armed with a telescoping baton, interfering with police during civil disorder, obstruction of Congress and other offenses. He entered not guilty pleas through his attorney Wednesday.

Stills from surveillance video at the Capitol show Cua holding the baton while confronting a police officer in a hallway near the Senate chamber. Cua eventually made it onto the Senate floor during the disturbance. Moss asked to see the actual video before making a decision on whether to release Cua, who has been in jail since he was arrested on Feb. 5.

Prosecutors say Cua’s case is particularly serious because of the stream of social media posts he sent before and after the riot, encouraging violence and even executions of government officials.

“On JAN 6th congress will open their blinds and see MILLIONS OF ANGRY #PATRIOTS. OPEN CARRY MISSON [sic],” Cua wrote on the right-wing platform Parler. “If they vote for sleepy joe and commie KAMALA, we BREAK DOWN THEIR DOORS AND TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK BY FORCE!”

Cua also promoted action against Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp. “WHEN IS IT TIME TO DRAG HIM OUT OF HIS MANSION? IM READY!!! THIS IS OUR #1776,” he wrote.

Moss said that while Cua’s actions at the Capitol may have not been among the most egregious that day, his foreknowledge was incriminating.

“Perhaps most troubling, sort of with uncanny foresight, he knew what was going to happen,” said the judge. “He was posting about going to the Capitol for the purpose of violence before it happened ... He predicted things were going to happen that I never in a million years would imagine would happen at our Capitol. They were just shocking and appalling. ... Talking about public execution of people who work for Congress. ‘No warning shot.’”

An attorney for Cua, William Zapf, said that was just the kind of pumped-up talk some people get carried away with on the web.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Police uncover ‘possible plot’ by militia to breach Capitol
By MICHAEL BALSAMOtoday



1 of 5
Members of the Michigan National Guard and the U.S. Capitol Police keep watch as heightened security remains in effect around the Capitol grounds since the Jan. 6 attacks by a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump, in Washington, Wednesday, March 3, 2021. The U.S. Capitol Police say they have intelligence showing there is a "possible plot" by a militia group to breach the Capitol on Thursday. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)


WASHINGTON (AP) — Capitol Police say they have uncovered intelligence of a “possible plot” by a militia group to breach the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, nearly two months after a mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the iconic building to try to stop Congress from certifying now-President Joe Biden’s victory.

The threat appears to be connected to a far-right conspiracy theory, mainly promoted by supporters of QAnon, that Trump will rise again to power on March 4. That was the original presidential inauguration day until 1933, when it was moved to Jan. 20.

Online chatter identified by authorities included discussions among members of the Three Percenters, an anti-government militia group, concerning possible plots against the Capitol on Thursday, according to two law enforcement officials who were not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. Members of the Three Percenters were among the extremists who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

The announcement comes as the Capitol police and other law enforcement agencies are taking heat from Congress in contentious hearings this week on their handling of the Jan. 6 riot. Police were ill-prepared for the mass of Trump supporters in tactical gear, some armed, and it took hours for National Guard reinforcements to come. By then, rioters had broken and smashed their way into the building and roamed the halls for hours, stalling Congress’ certification effort temporarily and sending lawmakers into hiding.

“The United States Capitol Police Department is aware of and prepared for any potential threats towards members of Congress or towards the Capitol complex,” the agency said in a statement. “We have obtained intelligence that shows a possible plot to breach the Capitol by an identified militia group on Thursday, March 4.” Police did not identify the militia group in the statement.

The U.S. House was abruptly wrapping its work for the week Wednesday night given the threat of violence.

An advisory sent earlier this week to members of Congress by Timothy Blodgett, the acting House sergeant-at-arms, said that the Capitol Police had “no indication that groups will travel to Washington D.C. to protest or commit acts of violence.”

But that advisory was updated in a note to lawmakers Wednesday morning. Blodgett wrote that the Capitol Police had received “new and concerning information and intelligence indicating additional interest in the Capitol for the dates of March 4th – 6th by a militia group.”

In her testimony to the House panel, acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman said her investigators had collected “some concerning intelligence,” but declined to provide any details publicly, saying that it was “law enforcement sensitive” and that she would provide a private briefing for the subcommittee members.

Lawmakers, congressional staffers and law enforcement officials are still on edge after the attack last month, even as the security posture around the Capitol remains at an unprecedented level.

On Wednesday, federal agents were seeking to determine whether there was an increase in the number of hotel rooms being rented in Washington, as well as monitoring flights to the area, car rental reservations and any buses being chartered to bring groups into the capital, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. The person could not publicly discuss details of the security planning and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The FBI and Department of Homeland Security also sent a joint intelligence bulletin to local law enforcement officials Tuesday warning that a group of militia extremists had discussed trying to take control of the Capitol on March 4 and encouraging thousands of people to come to D.C. to try to remove Democrats from power.

There has been a noticeable decline in online activity on some social media platforms surrounding efforts on March 4, and there was already considerably less online chatter than during the lead-up to Jan. 6, a day that Trump repeatedly had promoted for a his rally and encouraged thousands to come to the nation’s capital.

Several QAnon groups still operating on the social media messaging platform Telegram warned followers to stay away from any events on March 4, claiming it was a setup for Trump supporters.

“If there are groups out there planning and advertising events on or around March 4 anywhere in the country (DC included) we strongly urge everyone to avoid them entirely,” one Telegram user wrote late last month in a QAnon group that has more than 65,000 followers.

There’s also a very large fence in place around the U.S. Capitol that blocks off all avenues of entry including on the streets around the building, which was put in place after Jan. 6.

Also, thousands of accounts that promoted the Jan. 6 event that led to a violent storming of the U.S. Capitol have since been suspended by major tech companies like Facebook and Twitter, making it far more difficult for QAnon and far-right groups to organize a repeat of the mass gathering on Thursday.

Twitter banned more than 70,000 accounts after the riots, while Facebook and Instagram removed posts mentioning “stop the steal,” a pro-Trump rallying cry used to mobilize his supporters in January. And the conservative social media platform Parler, which many of Trump’s supporters joined to promote false election fraud conspiracy theories and encourage friends to “storm” the Capitol on Jan. 6, was booted off the internet following the siege.

Capitol Police say that they have stepped up security around the Capitol complex since January’s insurrection, adding physical security measures such as the fencing topped with razor wire around the Capitol and members of the National Guard who remain at the complex. The statement said the agency was “taking the intelligence seriously” but provided no other specific details on the threat.

“I think they are definitely prepared for any threats that may come our way in the next couple days,” said Rep. Jennifer Wexton, D-Va., who was one of several lawmakers briefed privately by the police. Wexton added that she still questioned the long-term security plan for the Capitol and said Pittman, the acting chief, “has not come up with proactive ways to fix the issues that they had.”

So far, about 300 people have been charged with federal crimes for their roles in the riot. Five people, including a Capitol Police officer, died.

Since his defeat, Trump has been promoting lies that the election was stolen from him through mass voter fraud, even though such claims have been rejected by judges, Republican state officials and Trump’s own administration. He was impeached by the House after the Jan. 6 riot on a c harge of incitement of insurrection but was acquitted by the Senate.
___
Associated Press writers Nomaan Merchant in Houston; Colleen Long, Alan Fram, and Mary Clare Jalonick in Washington; and Amanda Seitz in Chicago contributed to this report.
 

LibertyMom

Senior Member

Antifa Violent National Autonomous Day of Action Planned – The Kids Won’t Be Quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot

By Tayler Hansen
Published March 3, 2021 at 8:50pm

ANTIFA is planning another day of chaos and destruction. They’re calling it the “Autonomous Day of Action” and it’s scheduled for March 6th.

Rumble video on website .53 min

The video posted is an advertisement for the events on March 6th. The video calls on ANTIFA Worldwide to come together for a day to create, destroy, and cause chaos.

So they’re going to “create” and “destroy” at the same protest! Figure that one out.

The video features ANTIFA carrying out violent attacks against the police with a sound track that is repeating “lynch your leaders“.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1364966555549859841
.59 min

The original video was posted to a twitter account by the name of @FrontGreen

The video was created by @FullAffinity, an ANTIFA Activist who has publicly voiced support for radical acts of violence in order to change the system.

148691313_286003762944587_94699508104631152_n.jpg

EtZX9_PXMAIoVOt-1-992x1024-1.jpeg
Et9YSMwXUAEUZlX-1024x576-1.jpeg


The official advertisement banners for the “Autonomous Day of Action”.
The motto of the event is “The Kids Won’t Be quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot“.

cropped-banner.jpg


On the official website, @FullAffinity provided the following statement:

“We’re calling for an autonomous day of action. A day of creation and destruction. Get organising. Keep it quiet. Keep it serious. Stay safe comrades

6th March. Get in action. **** shit up. Target capitalism. Target the state. Paint your streets. Fight injustice. Squat your local empty. Help the homeless community. Drop some banners. BE GAY DO CRIME!

We want direct action against the system. Anything you can do to attack the state. This March 6th the kids wont be quiet!
WE WILL **** SHIT UP!

The Official website

The Kids Won’t Be Quiet, They’re Going To Start A Riot – FSA Call For Day of Action – Green Anti-Capitalist Media

This sounds insane.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

While Republicans Slept, Democrats Stole the 2020 Election – Like Communists, They Are Working to Lock In Their Lawless Third World Voting Rules

By Joe Hoft
Published March 4, 2021 at 7:30am
democrats-communists-.jpg

It’s the end of the world as we know it…

This is so serious and Republicans and Big Media do and say nothing. Now the Democrats are taking their lead from the communist playbook, elections in America will soon be over if they get away with this. A select few members of the Democrat Party will decide who wins each and every election going forward.

This was why it was imperative to fight for integrity in results in the 2020 election. We knew if the Democrats got away with stealing President Trump’s landslide election they would never relinquish control.

Rush Limbaugh warned America this fall that Democrats were done with elections. They were tired of having to try and convince Americans of the benefits of higher taxes, open borders, weak defense, anti-American – pro-China trade deals, etc…

The election came and numerous events occurred that showed the election was being stolen:

The Democrats took their lead from the communist playbook:

America’s last chance occurred on January 6th. Vice President Mike Pence had the opportunity to stop the steal and demand accurate and comprehensive counts in the swing states who had multiple electors.

Instead, Pence betrayed his President and America and confirmed the stolen results:


The Democrats got away with it and the Republicans were too weak and scared to stop it. Many leaders in the Republican Party were happy to see the most popular President in US history, Donald J. Trump, leave office. Although their voting base loved President Trump and showed it in record numbers of legitimate votes, Republican leaders sided with the steal. (Unfortunately, they don’t know that no one is buying it.)

Republicans in leadership roles in numerous swing states were complicit in the steal. It’s all about power and money. The Democrats, on the other hand, came out of their cocoon and showed their true colors. They are power and money-hungry thugs.

Now that their steal is complete, their first move they made was to to change election laws forever. Last night the Democrat House voted to lock in communist elections in the US for generations.

Republicans were too weak to counter the move. They barely even fought it.


We previously wrote about the bill they passed last night (more below):

Here is what we shared:

The Populist Press is reporting the first bill put together by this Pelosi-led Congress will eliminate free and fair elections forever. Fraud will be the mandate and Democrats, the kings of fraud, will win every election henceforth. The bill is labeled by the Communist Democrats – “For the People Act of 2021“.

Below are the key aspects of the bill as noted by the Populist Press:
Democrats introduce their first bill in the House: H.R.1 – The bill that will destroy America. Nationwide mail-in voting, banning restrictions on ballot harvesting, banning voter ID, criminal voters,DC Statehood roadwork, it’s all in here.
1) Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission.

“(a) Requiring Availability Of Internet For Online Registration.—Each State, acting through the chief State election official, shall ensure that the following services are available to the public at any time on the official public websites of the appropriate State and local election officials in the State, in the same manner and subject to the same terms and conditions as the services provided by voter registration agencies under section 7(a):
“(1) Online application for voter registration.

2) Banning the requirement to provide a full SSN for voter registration.
SEC. 1005. PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. (a) Form Included With Application For Motor Vehicle Driver’s License.—Section 5(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20504(c)(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the following: “, and to the extent that the application requires the applicant to provide a Social Security number, may not require the applicant to provide more than the last 4 digits of such number;”.

3) Nationwide ‘Motor Voter’ registration.

Note that motor voter registration is how thousands of illegal became registered voters in California and Nevada.

(2) DEFINITION.—The term “automatic registration” means a system that registers an individual to vote in elections for Federal office in a State, if eligible, by electronically transferring the information necessary for registration from government agencies to election officials of the State so that, unless the individual affirmatively declines to be registered, the individual will be registered to vote in such elections.

4) 16 year olds required to be registered to vote.
(d) Treatment Of Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—A State may not refuse to treat an individual as an eligible individual for purposes of this part on the grounds that the individual is less than 18 years of age at the time a contributing agency receives information with respect to the individual, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time. Nothing in the previous sentence may be construed to require a State to permit an individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an election for Federal office to vote in the election.

5) Nationwide same-day registration.
“(1) REGISTRATION.—Each State shall permit any eligible individual on the day of a Federal election and on any day when voting, including early voting, is permitted for a Federal election—
“(A) to register to vote in such election at the polling place using a form that meets the requirements under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the individual is already registered to vote, to revise any of the individual’s voter registration information); and
“(B) to cast a vote in such election.

6) Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Election Assistance Commission (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Commission”) shall make grants to eligible States to enable such States to carry out a plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election activities in the State.
7) More children voters.

“(k) Acceptance Of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual’s application to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time.

8) Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.
It’s this whole section, but in particular, this part below basically says nobody is allowed to request voter rolls to be cleaned up. ie: making it illegal to do what Tom Fitton was doing.

“(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES.—No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual’s eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that challenge is supported by personal knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is—

9) Murderers and rapists can vote.

(1) NOTIFICATION.—On the date determined under paragraph (2), each State shall notify in writing any individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense under the law of that State that such individual has the right to vote in an election for Federal office pursuant to the Democracy Restoration Act of 2021 and may register to vote in any such election and provide such individual with any materials that are necessary to register to vote in any such election.
10) Mandatory early voting.

Note that I personally like early voting in Florida, but putting it here anyway.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall allow individuals to vote in an election for Federal office during an early voting period which occurs prior to the date of the election, in the same manner as voting is allowed on such date.
11) THE BIG ONE – NATIONWIDE VOTE BY MAIL, BAN ON BALLOT PROTECTION MEASURES, LEGALIZED LIMITLESS BALLOT HARVESTING.

“SEC. 307. PROMOTING ABILITY OF VOTERS TO VOTE BY MAIL.
“(a) Uniform Availability Of Absentee Voting To All Voters.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an individual in a State is eligible to cast a vote in an election for Federal office, the State may not impose any additional conditions or requirements on the eligibility of the individual to cast the vote in such election by absentee ballot by mail.
“(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL.—
“(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT.—A State may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.
“(B) PROHIBITING REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZATION OR WITNESS SIGNATURE AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING OR CASTING BALLOT.—A State may not require notarization or witness signature or other formal authentication (other than voter attestation) as a condition of obtaining or casting an absentee ballot.
“(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT.—The State—
“(A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual, group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and
“(B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building, or election office.

12) Banning voter ID.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), if a State has in effect a requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of receiving and casting a ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the requirement—
“(A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual’s identity and attesting that the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or
13) Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.

The whole subtitle.
Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood
(B) ENSURING DIVERSITY.—In appointing the 9 members pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as well as in designating alternates pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) and in appointing alternates to fill vacancies pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), the first members of the independent redistricting commission shall ensure that the membership is representative of the demographic groups (including racial, ethnic, economic, and gender) and geographic regions of the State, and provides racial, ethnic, and language minorities protected under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with a meaningful opportunity to participate in the development of the State’s redistricting plan.
I am running out of time and space, but please look at this section:

SEC. 3201. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO PROTECT UNITED STATES DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Education, the Director of National Intelligence, the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission, and the heads of any other appropriate Federal agencies, shall issue a national strategy to protect against cyber attacks, influence operations, disinformation campaigns, and other activities that could undermine the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
(b) Considerations.—The national strategy required under subsection (a) shall include consideration of the following:
(1) The threat of a foreign state actor, foreign terrorist organization (as designated pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189)), or a domestic actor carrying out a cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
(3) Potential consequences, such as an erosion of public trust or an undermining of the rule of law, that could result from a successful cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

Literally forming a commission to effectively freeze anyone who says that the election was rigged.
While Republicans slept and backstabbed the true winner of the 2020 election, President Trump, the Democrats were diligently working to lock in communist-style elections forever.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

UPDATE: Judge Orders Release of Proud Boys Member Ethan Nordean After Feds Get Caught – Oversold His Case Like Worthless Trinkets from a 3 AM Infomercial

By Jim Hoft
Published March 4, 2021 at 8:51am
ethan-nordean.jpg

Surprise, surprise.

US Federal Judge Beryl Howell on Wednesday ordered the release of a prominent member of the far-right Proud Boys group while he awaits trial.


Judge Beryl ruled the feds failed to show that Ethan Nordean posed such a danger to the public that he must be jailed while his case unfolds.

On Tuesday The Gateway Pundit reported on Ethan Nordean and fellow Proud Boy Dominic Pezzola who were jailed and tortured while waiting their court date for attending the protests at the US Capitol on January 6th.


The Feds got caught overselling their worthless trinkets like an infomercial at 3 AM with free wind chimes.

According to Reuters Nordean WAS NOT a ringleader on January 6th as the feds said he was.

ethan-nordean-proud-boys.jpg

Ethan Nordean was pictured with a bullhorn walking to the US Capitol on January 6th. (Capeandislands)

The case against Nordean is falling apart.

But the federal government wanted to keep him locked up without bond anyway.
Federal prosecutors had “backtracked” and failed to substantiate allegations that Nordean was a ringleader of the attack, which left five people dead, including a police officer.
“The dearth of evidence about his directions is significant,” Howell said, adding the evidence she heard at Wednesday’s hearing suggested Nordean just “went along with this mob.”

Howell said other Proud Boys members have been released pending trial, and that she needed to be consistent in her rulings. The Jan. 6 attack by supporters of former President Donald Trump resulted in the deaths of five people.

“What the government said in its original papers was that he directed the Proud Boys with specific plans, telling them to split up into groups and attempt to break in to the Capitol building,” Howell said. “That’s a far cry from what I heard at the hearing today.”
The Justice Department has charged nearly 20 members or associates of the Proud Boys in the Capitol breach, and it has accused several members of spearheading early efforts to stampede police and break in to the building.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

NOT MAKING HEADLINES: Antifa Members Caught with Gun at Jan 6th Protests, Arrested then Released — SOMEONE NOTIFY CROOKED CHRIS WRAY

By Jim Hoft
Published March 4, 2021 at 10:04am
IMG_7568.jpg

Earlier this week FBI Chief Chris Wray lied to the US Senate and claimed there was no evidence Antifa members played a role during the January 6th US Capitol protests.


Chris Wray also said there was no evidence of Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters at the January 6th protests.

This was another lie.



The disparity between how federal prosecutors apply the law to Trump supporters and those associated with Antifa is anything but equal.

Below are two such cases that occurred in the same D.C. locale, on the same day and arrested for the same offense.

It appears government prosecutors have a propensity to drop the charges of those associated with leftist groups like Antifa and overcharge those on the right who support President Trump.
Here is an example:

One Antifa member was caught with a gun and arrested on January 6th on weapons charges. But Leslie Grimes was later released despite lying to officers about the gun in their vehicle.

Via NBC News:
Leslie Grimes and two fellow antifa members drove to Washington from Michigan to counter-demonstrate during the Trump rally. According to one of Grimes’ friends, the group walked around for a while but returned to the car after Grimes was roughed by some Trump supporters.
As the trio were getting into the car, they were surrounded by officers who said someone had reported that they were seen “putting weapons in the trunk,” according to a video of the encounter posted on Facebook.

One of the three denied that there were any weapons in the car, but officers found a handgun in the trunk.
Grimes was taken into custody on a charge of possessing an unlicensed gun after she told the officers the firearm belonged to her. She spent the night in jail, but authorities declined to move forward with charges, according to her attorney.

The friend said he does not understand how police knew there was a gun in the car. “It was in the trunk the whole time,” the friend said. “How would they know? It doesn’t make any sense.
Similarly, two Trump supporters were caught with a gun in their car. But they were not released. The two were arrested after telling officers they had a gun in their car.
Via NBC News:
Charles Snell, 40, and Timothy Wolfe, 32, drove up together from Chesapeake, Virginia, to take part in the Trump rally, arriving about 11 a.m. They had been on the road for about three hours and were excited to take pictures at the event and to be “a part of history,” Snell said in an interview.
But they never made it to the rally.

Snell turned into what he thought was a public parking garage on 12th Street, just a couple of blocks from the National Mall.
A security guard stopped the car and asked whether they had any weapons inside, Snell said. Snell, a private security guard himself, had a handgun in his backpack in the back seat. Wolfe told the guard that he had a gun on the floorboard, a Glock 9 mm with 12 rounds in the magazine.

The two men were placed under arrest on charges of carrying a pistol without a license, possession of unregistered ammunition and possession of a large-capacity ammunition feeding device.
“It was my fault,” Snell said. “I didn’t research it before I came, or I wouldn’t have brought fingernail clippers on my key ring. Heck no.”

“I’m doing security,” he added. “If I get some kind of conviction, I might end up losing my license.”
Snell said they brought their guns only for security during travel to and from Washington.
This is a stunning example of the double standard and lies coming from our media and Washington DC.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

UPDATE: Four Months After the 2020 Election in Georgia, Over 400,000 Absentee Ballots are Missing Legally Required Chain of Custody Documentation, Yet Biden Was Given the State by 12,000 Votes

By Joe Hoft
Published March 4, 2021 at 1:30pm
kemp-raffensperger.jpg

Georgia still hasn’t come up with over 400,00o legally required chain of custody documents for predominantly Joe Biden ballots in the 2020 election. But they had no problem claiming Biden won the election by 10,000 votes.

We reported a couple of months ago that the state of Georgia certified their 2020 Presidential election results despite not have chain of custody documentation for 460,000 ballots in the election no doubt heavily favoring Joe Biden. These legally required documents were of no concern to corrupt Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who gave the election to Joe Biden with only a 10,000 vote lead.


This morning the Georgia Star News provides an update on these illegitimate ballots:
Four months after the November 3, 2020 presidential election, state and county officials in Georgia have failed to produce chain of custody documents for an estimated 404,691 vote by mail absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes and subsequently delivered to county registrars for counting.
As of March 3, only 56 of Georgia’s 159 counties have provided ballot transfer form data to The Georgia Star News. The number of absentee by mail ballots delivered to registrars in those 56 counties total only 195,309, or 32.5 percent, of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
In other words, there is no chain of custody for 67.5 percent – an estimated 404,691 – of the estimated 600,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars and counted in Georgia’s 2020 presidential election.
The 2020 presidential election outcome in Georgia was decided by fewer than 12,000 votes – about three percent of the 404,000 absentee vote by mail ballots deposited in drop boxes and delivered to county registrars where they were counted.
What a joke the Georgia election was in 2020. Raffensperger and Kemp should be in jail for certifying their election results.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Victors Of Mail-In Ballot Election Indicted For Stealing, Faking Votes.
ELECTION
Four men were indicted by New Jersey’s Attorney General for mail-in ballot fraud.

The charges come from a May 12th, 2020 special election in the city of Paterson, which was conducted entirely by mail-in ballots.

Among the individuals charged are Councilman Michael Jackson and Councilman Alex Mendez.
“It is alleged that Jackson and Mendez violated state election laws as candidates by approaching one or more voters in Paterson in the districts where they were running and collecting their official mail-in ballots for delivery to the Passaic County Board of Elections. It is further alleged that these mail-in ballots were delivered to the Board of Elections without information identifying the bearer, in violation of state election laws,” local news reports.

“In addition, Jackson, 48, and Mendez, 45, allegedly procured and had in their possession official mail-in ballots which were neither their own ballots, nor ballots for which they were identified as an authorized bearer. Mendez also allegedly procured or submitted one or more voter registration applications, which he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, in that he knew the person for whom the application was procured was not eligible to vote in the election district identified on the application,” a summary adds.

Shelim Khalique, 51, and Abu Razyen, 21 were also charged with criminal conduct involving mail-in ballots during the election.

Khalique approached residents in Paterson’s 2nd Ward to collect and deliver mail-in ballots despite failing to properly verify them.

“In addition, Khalique and the bus company he owns, A-1 Elegant Tours, Inc., d/b/a Eastern Star Transportation, LLC, were charged today with contract fraud and other crimes in a separate investigation by OPIA, the New Jersey State Police, Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, and Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office,” the summary adds.

Rayzen allegedly procured and possessed several mail-in ballots “which were not his own and for which he was not identified as an authorized bearer.”

“Investigators obtained a USB drive containing a video of Razyen holding and flipping through a stack of more than three official mail-in ballot outer envelopes that did not have the bearer portion completed,” local reporting added.

The case was cited by Donald Trump’s campaign in its unsuccessful lawsuit to stop New Jersey’s vote-by-mail plan for the presidential election.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

1 In 3 BLM/AntiFa Rioters Are Having Their Cases Dismissed By Biden’s Dept Of Justice.
biden
Federal prosecutors have dismissed over one-third of cases from the violent AntiFa and Black Lives Matter riots occurring in Portland last summer.

“KGW reviewed federal court records and found 31 of the 90 protest cases have been dismissed by the U.S. Department of Justice, including a mix of misdemeanor and felony charges,” a local news outlet revealed.

More than half of the cases dropped were “dismissed with prejudice,” which means the case can’t be brought back to court, and at least 11 of the dismissals occurred on or after the inauguration of President Joe Biden.

And some of the cases dropped involve felony charges of assault of a federal officer.

“Several people closely involved with the protest cases, who asked not to be identified, said they expect many more federal charges to be dismissed soon,” KGW adds.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Election Integrity Is a National Imperative

Mike Pence / @Mike_Pence / March 03, 2021
  • 210302_PenceHR1-800x420.jpg
Then-Vice President Mike Pence, seen here Jan. 4 campaigning for Republican senatorial candidates in Milner, Georgia, calls the Democrat-backed HR 1, the so-called For the People Act, an "unconstitutional power grab" by the left. (Photo: Megan Varner/Getty Images)

COMMENTARY BY
Portrait of Mike Pence
Mike Pence
@Mike_Pence
Mike Pence is a distinguished visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation. He previously served as vice president of the United States, governor of Indiana, and member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

After an election marked by significant voting irregularities and numerous instances of officials setting aside state election law, I share the concerns of millions of Americans about the integrity of the 2020 election.

That’s why when I was serving as presiding officer at the joint session of Congress certifying the Electoral College results, I pledged to ensure that all objections properly raised under the Electoral Count Act would be given a full hearing before Congress and the American people.

The tragic events of Jan. 6—the most significant being the loss of life and violence at our nation’s Capitol—also deprived the American people of a substantive discussion in Congress about election integrity in America.

Under the Constitution, elections are governed at the state level. And each state is required to appoint presidential electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.”

Many of the most troubling voting irregularities took place in states that set aside laws enacted by state legislatures in favor of sweeping changes ordered by governors, secretaries of state, and courts.

While legislators in many states have begun work on election reform to restore public confidence in state elections, unfortunately, congressional Democrats have chosen to sweep those valid concerns and reforms aside and to push forward a brazen attempt to nationalize elections in blatant disregard of the U.S. Constitution.

Congress will vote this week on HR 1, the so-called For the People Act, a massive 800-page election overhaul bill that would increase opportunities for election fraud, trample the First Amendment, further erode confidence in our elections, and forever dilute the votes of legally qualified eligible voters.

In 2008, when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Indiana’s new voter ID law, the ruling noted that America has a long, well-documented history of election fraud. The court cited the 2005 report of the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform headed by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, which said the “electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter or detect fraud.”

HR 1 would eliminate those safeguards and prevent states from implementing new, needed reforms. Polling shows that large numbers of Democrats did not trust the outcome of the 2016 election and that large numbers of Republicans still do not trust the outcome of the 2020 election.

We have to do everything we can to change that and ensure that the American people, no matter which political party they favor, have confidence in the fairness and security of the election process.

HR 1 mandates the most questionable and abuse-prone election rules nationwide, while banning commonsense measures to detect, deter, and prosecute election fraud.

The bill would force states to adopt universal mail-in ballots, early voting, same-day voter registration, online voter registration, and automatic voter registration for any individual listed in state and federal government databases, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles and welfare offices, ensuring duplicate registrations and that millions of illegal immigrants are quickly registered to vote.

States would be required to count every mail-in vote that arrives up to 10 days after Election Day. States must also allow ballot harvesting—where paid political operatives collect absentee ballots from places such as nursing homes—exposing our most vulnerable voters to coercion and increasing the risk that their ballots will be tampered with.

At the same time, state and local election officials would be stripped of their ability to maintain the accuracy of voter rolls, barred from verifying voter eligibility, and voter ID would be banned from coast to coast.

Congressional districts would be redrawn by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats. Illegal immigrants and law-abiding American citizens would receive equal representation in Congress. Felons would be able to vote the moment they set foot out of prison.

Leftists not only want you powerless at the ballot box, they want to silence and censor anyone who would dare to criticize their unconstitutional power grab.

HR 1 is also loaded with ill-advised changes to federal campaign laws that would impose onerous legal and administrative burdens on candidates, civic groups, unions, nonprofit organizations, and ordinary citizens who want to exercise their First Amendment rights to engage in political speech, including on public policy issues that are vital to the life of our nation.

Under HR 1, donations to many private organizations would be made public, exposing millions of Americans to the radical left’s cancel culture crusade.

Every single proposed change in HR 1 serves one goal, and one goal only: to give leftists a permanent, unfair, and unconstitutional advantage in our political system.

HR 1 would turn a blind eye to very real problems at the state level, exacerbate existing vulnerabilities, and further undermine the American people’s confidence in the principle of “one person, one vote.”

Election reform is a national imperative, but under our Constitution, election reform must be undertaken at the state level. Our Founders limited Congress’ role in conducting our elections for good reason: They wanted elections to be administered closest to the people, free from undue influence of the national government.

Having run for office at both the state and federal levels, I have concluded that the bedrock principles of free and fair elections are access, security, and the ability to engage in free and open debate.

HR 1 is an unconstitutional, reckless, and anti-democratic bill that would erode those foundational principles and could permanently damage our republic.

After a year in which our nation has endured a global pandemic, economic hardship, and a contentious election, now is not the time to further inflame passion and division. It is time for our nation’s leaders to help America heal.

To restore public confidence in our elections, our leaders should uphold the Constitution, reject congressional Democrats’ plan to nationalize our elections, and get about the serious work of state-based reform that will protect the integrity of the vote for every American.

The American people expect us to ensure that every eligible citizen is able to vote and also make sure that their vote is not stolen or diluted through errors, mistakes, or outright fraud.

Every citizen deserves the freedom to support, oppose, criticize, or promote the candidates and causes they believe in. And most importantly, the American people must have the utmost confidence that every voice matters, and every vote counts—or democracy cannot survive.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Democrats passed HR 1, their massive voting rights bill
The bill still faces a steep climb in the US Senate.

By Ella Nilsenella.nilsen@vox.com Mar 3, 2021, 10:52pm EST
US Captiol
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks during a weekly press conference on Capitol Hill on February 25, 2021, in Washington, DC. Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

House Democrats have passed HR 1, their signature anti-corruption and voting rights reform bill, for the second time in two years. But even though their party now holds the majority in the Senate, the bill has a tough road ahead of it.

As the numeral suggests, HR 1 and its Senate component S 1 — also known as the For the People Act — are Democrats’ first legislative priority. The sweeping democracy reform bill has been top of the list since House Democrats first took back the majority in the 2018 midterms and immediately set out to expand voting rights and curb the influence of money in politics.
There’s a lot of ground covered in its nearly 800 pages, but some of its key points are creating a national system for automatic voter registration, putting in transparency requirements for political advertising, and instituting nonpartisan redistricting commissions to end partisan gerrymandering.

Polling back in 2019 and now shows the bill is broadly popular with the public, but it went nowhere in the Republican-led Senate in 2019. Even with the current slim Democratic control (a 50-50 Senate with Vice President Kamala Harris as the tiebreaker), it will be incredibly difficult to pass with the required 60 votes to skirt the Senate filibuster. The politics are even tighter this time around; some moderate House Democrats who voted for the bill before pushed more aggressively for changes in the current bill.

The bill’s future in the Senate is also untested, as then-Majority Leader McConnell never allowed it to come to the floor in 2019.

“If Mitch McConnell is not willing to provide 10 Republicans to support this landmark reform, I think Democrats are going to step back and reevaluate the situation,” Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD), the author of HR 1, told Vox in a recent interview. “There’s all manner of ways you could redesign the filibuster so [the bill] would have a path forward.”

One path that’s being discussed is partially amending Senate filibuster rules to allow democracy reform legislation like HR 1 to advance on a simple majority vote and therefore potentially be able to pass on a party-line vote. That would be different from fully blowing up the filibuster, but it still could get pushback from Senate institutionalists even in the Democratic Party like Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a staunch advocate of keeping the filibuster in place.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the chair of the Senate Rules Committee, which will mark up the bill and move it forward, said she wants to bring the bill to the floor and see what the support for it is before she moves on to potential filibuster reform.

“We’ll go to the floor; that’s when we see where we are,” Klobuchar told Vox in an interview, saying her committee will look to see, “is there filibuster reform that could be done generally or specifically?”

Vox’s German Lopez is here to guide you through the Biden administration’s unprecedented burst of policymaking. Sign up to receive our newsletter each Friday.

Democrats are arguing that voting and democracy reforms are popular — and long overdue

Democrats are hoping the 2020 election gives them an argument for this bill. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, Americans in many states were given more options and flexibility to vote through the mail or with in-person early voting. The results were a record 158.4 million ballots cast; 2020 presidential election turnout was about 7 percentage points higher than in 2016, according to Pew Research Center.

“We had more people vote in the November election than ever before,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson told reporters on Tuesday.

HR 1, among other initiatives, would cement many of those temporary expansions. And recent polling from the progressive firm Data for Progress showed the bill more broadly is popular across parties and supported by a majority of Democratic, independent, and Republican voters. The poll found that 67 percent of national likely voters supported HR 1, including 56 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of independents, and 77 percent of Democrats.

Republican legislatures in multiple states, however, are moving in the opposite direction. Per the Brennan Center, at least 33 states have already introduced, prefiled, or carried over 165 restrictive bills to re-tighten voting requirements, including Georgia — the state that gave Democrats narrow control of the Senate. The US Supreme Court is currently hearing arguments in an Arizona case that could further weaken the Voting Rights Act, limiting protections for minority voters around the country.

Klobuchar told Vox that in past years when parties lost national elections, they’d assess where they went wrong. Republicans, she added, are doubling down on restricting voting access.
“These guys, instead of doing that, are saying let’s just make it so less people vote, that’s how we do this,” Klobuchar said.

Newly proposed voting restrictions, taken with the fact that 30 state legislatures are controlled by Republicans — compared to 18 controlled by Democrats — mean that Republicans have more power to redraw congressional maps in the 2021 redistricting process. Absent nonpartisan redistricting commissions (which HR 1 contains), Republicans can once again redraw maps to give themselves the edge in the 2022 midterms and beyond.

“If we can get this done and into law in the next few months, there will be enough time to implement many of these things in time for the 2022 midterm election, including how reforming how this redistricting is done,” Sarbanes said.

What’s in the bill

The For the People Act weighs in at close to 800 pages. Broadly, it can be broken down into three buckets: expanding voting rights, implementing campaign finance reform, and beefing up ethics laws for members of Congress.

Here are some major points in the bill, broken down by category:

Voting rights
  • Creates new national automatic voter registration that asks voters to opt out rather than opt in, ensuring more people will be signed up to vote. Requires chief state election officials to automatically register eligible unregistered citizens.
  • Requires each state to put online options for voter registration, correction, cancellation, or designating party affiliation.
  • Requires at least 15 consecutive days of early voting for federal elections; early voting sites would be open for at least 10 hours per day. The bill also prohibits states from restricting a person’s ability to vote by mail, and requires states to prepay postage on return envelopes for mail-in voting.
  • Establish independent redistricting commissions in states as a way to draw new congressional districts and end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections.
  • Prohibits voter roll purging and bans the use of non-forwardable mail being used as a way to remove voters from rolls.
  • Restores voting rights to people convicted of felonies who have completed their sentences; however, the bill doesn’t restore rights to felons currently serving sentences in a correctional facility.
Campaign finance
  • Establishes public financing of campaigns, powered by small donations. This has long been Sarbanes’s vision: The federal government would provide a voluntary 6-1 match for candidates for president and Congress, which means for every dollar a candidate raises from small donations, the federal government would match it six times over. The maximum small donation that could be matched would be capped at $200. This program isn’t funded by taxpayer dollars; instead, the money would come from adding a 4.75 percent fee on criminal and civil fines, fees, penalties, or settlements with banks and corporations that commit corporate malfeasance (think Wells Fargo).
  • Supports a constitutional amendment to end Citizens United.
  • Passes the DISCLOSE Act, pushed by Rep. David Cicilline and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, both Democrats from Rhode Island. This would require super PACs and “dark money” political organizations to make their donors public.
  • Passes the Honest Ads Act, championed by Sens. Klobuchar and Mark Warner (VA), which would require Facebook and Twitter to disclose the source of money for political ads on their platforms and share how much money was spent. (A Facebook spokesman told Vox the company has publicly supported Honest Ads Act since 2018).
  • Discloses any political spending by government contractors and slows the flow of foreign money into the elections by targeting shell companies.
  • Restructures the Federal Election Commission to have five commissioners instead of six, in order to break political gridlock at the organization.
  • Prohibits any coordination between candidates and super PACs.
Ethics
  • Requires the president and vice president to disclose 10 years of his or her tax returns. Candidates for president and vice president must also do the same.
  • Stops members of Congress from using taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment or discrimination cases.
  • Gives the Office of Government Ethics the power to do more oversight and enforcement and implement stricter lobbying registration requirements. These include more oversight of foreign agents by the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
  • Creates a new ethics code for the US Supreme Court, ensuring all branches of government are impacted by the new law.
Democrats have a very narrow window to pass the bill

HR 1 could be a last-ditch effort for Democrats to be competitive in House races, if they can get it through Congress and to President Joe Biden’s desk.

“The president remains committed to protecting the fundamental right to vote and making it easy for all eligible Americans to vote,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday, responding to a question from Vox. “That’s why we need to pass reforms like HR 1 and restore the Voting Rights Act. It’s a priority for the president, something he’ll be working with members of Congress to move forward.”

On Thursday, Biden released a statement commending House Democrats for passing the bill, and promising to sign it into law “after it has passed through the legislative process, so that together we can strengthen and restore American democracy for the next election and all those to come.” But the bill’s real test will be whether it can get through the Senate.

Senate Democrats aren’t ready to blow up the Senate filibuster yet, but they’re also finding ways to skirt it to pass major pieces of legislation.

This week, Democrats are using budget reconciliation to pass Biden’s current Covid-19 stimulus bill through the Senate with just 51 votes. There’s a good chance they’ll do the same thing for Biden’s forthcoming infrastructure plan, depending on how big that package is and how many Republicans will support it.

But Democrats can only use budget reconciliation twice, and it can only be used for things that directly impact the federal budget. Voting rights and anti-corruption measures don’t fall into that category, and HR 1’s authors are under no impression it could get through via budget reconciliation. That leaves them with a narrower set of options for HR 1, and even fewer options for other priorities like passing universal background checks or immigration reform.

Even though Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) have repeatedly said they won’t get rid of the Senate filibuster, some of their Democratic colleagues are hopeful they might change their minds if the party’s agenda meets repeated opposition from Republicans.

“You bring it to the floor a few times and you let them obstruct it and you see what effect bad-faith obstruction has on some members’ views about the filibuster,” Sen. Whitehouse told reporters recently. “It’s one thing to say, ‘I don’t want to get rid of the filibuster’; it’s another thing after you’ve met repeated bad-faith obstruction to say, ‘Okay, this is getting out of hand.’”

That might be too optimistic. When asked by reporters again this week if there was a point where he’d change his mind about the filibuster, Manchin yelled, “Never!” according to the Hill’s Jordain Carney.

“Jesus Christ! What don’t you understand about never?” Manchin added.

Short of blowing up the filibuster, Senate Democrats will need to keep finding loopholes to pass their agenda.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Passes Bill Gutting Election Integrity, Free Political Speech

BY TYLER O'NEIL MAR 04, 2021 12:01 AM ET
Share Tweet
fe4c268a-f0b4-45e7-ad3b-488cb205f768-730x487.jpg
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
On Wednesday evening, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1, the “For the People” Act, which federalizes state election law and undermines key safeguards such as voter ID.

The bill passed 220-210, with every Republican voting against it (and two not voting) and every Democrat but one voting for it.

This kind of rank partisanship on an elections bill should worry Americans, and so should the specifics of what the bill does.

H.R. 1 requires states to allow any eligible voter to vote by mail in federal elections, a practice that is inherently less secure than in-person voting. The bill also requires states to allow any eligible voter to use ballot drop-boxes of the kind that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) financed in the 2020 election, likely driving up turnout in blue areas. H.R. 1 also mandates that states accept ballots that arrive in the mail up to 10 days after Election Day, so long as they had been postmarked on or before Election Day, echoing a controversial practice in Pennsylvania in 2020.

The bill creates a nationwide automatic voter registration program, which would likely result in double-registrations and the registration of non-citizens. In fact, H.R. 1 explicitly exempts from prosecution people who are “not eligible to vote in elections for Federal office but [were] automatically registered to vote” (Sec. 1015).

It allows felons who have completed their incarceration to vote.

H.R. 1 also includes a new program providing for public financing of federal elections, matching small-dollar donations 6 to 1. The match would kick in for each grassroots contribution to a candidate up to $200. A $200 donation to a House candidate would garner a $1,200 match in public funds for a total contribution of $1,400, for example.

The bill would reduce the number of members on the Federal Election Commission from 6 to 5. Democrats argue that this will allow the commission to avoid deadlock and do its job, but Republicans warn that this would make the FEC a “partisan weapon.”

The bill would also require politically-active organizations, including 401(c)3 nonprofits, to disclose donors who give $10,000 or more; expand the definition of election-related communication; and reduce the influence of independent expenditure-only “super PACs.” Such campaign finance regulations would limit Americans’ ability to band together to advocate political causes they believe in.

While Democrats’ railing against “dark money” has convinced Americans there is something inherently sleazy about groups of Americans spending money to advocate for causes they believe in, Americans do not lose their right to free speech when they enter the political arena. The mandated disclosure of an organization’s donors, in particular, undercuts this fundamental right.

“It is beyond debate that the freedom to engage in association for the advancement of beliefs and ideas is an inseparable aspect of the ‘liberty’ assured by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” The Supreme Court wrote in the landmark case NAACP v. Alabama (1958). The State of Alabama had ordered the NAACP to hand over a list of its members during the era of segregation when the Ku Klux Klan held tremendous power in the state. The Supreme Court defended the NAACP from this government harassment.

“Tonight the House of Representatives voted in favor of a bill that tramples on the free speech and free association rights of American citizens,” Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Zack Pruitt said after the bill passed.

“Throughout its nearly 800 pages of complex and convoluted text, H.R. 1 imposes unworkable and invasive regulations on the ability of individual Americans and groups of citizens to discuss vital policy issues with elected officials or the public and to exercise constitutionally protected freedoms,” Pruitt explained. “The bill intrudes upon the private financial decisions made by everyday citizens, subjecting them to harassment and intimidation simply for giving to causes they care about.”

“Despite being called the ‘For the People Act,’ it is anything but that, as the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that ‘the people lose when the government is the one deciding which ideas should prevail.’ We hope the Senate will see through this façade and reject this misleading and deeply flawed bill,” he concluded.

After the irregularities of the 2020 election raised serious concerns about election integrity — and after the Time story confessing to a “cabal” in the 2020 election — Democrats are foisting a partisan makeover of election law on the American people that will only worsen concerns about election integrity.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Georgia House Passes Omnibus Election Reform Bill "To Restore Voters' Confidence"

THURSDAY, MAR 04, 2021 - 9:20
Authored by Mimi Nguyen Ly via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Georgia’s House of Representatives passed an omnibus bill that would reform a range of election rules, including over absentee voting, voter ID for absentee voting, time limits for voting, and more.
Voters go to the polls at Sara Smith Elementary polling station, in the Buckhead district, in Atlanta during the Georgia Senate runoff elections, on Jan. 5, 2021. (Virginie Kippelen/AFP via Getty Images)
The 66-page bill, HB 531 (pdf) passed the Republican majority chamber on a party line vote of 97-72 and is headed to the state Senate for further debate.

State Rep. Barry Fleming, a Republican, the main sponsor of the HB 531 bill, said that the proposal was designed to restore voters’ confidence in Georgia’s election system following the 2020 presidential election, which saw numerous allegations of voting irregularities and allegations of election fraud.

Separately, the GOP-majority Senate on Feb. 23 introduced its own version of an omnibus election reform bill, SB 241 (pdf) that has some overlap with HB 531. One difference is that the Senate bill would eliminate no-excuse absentee voting, something that has been allowed in Georgia since 2005, whereas the House bill would still allow no-excuse absentee voting.

Absentee Ballots

The proposed HB 531, first introduced on Feb. 18, sets up multiple requirements for absentee ballots, including a number of voter identification requirements in replacement of the state’s current signature match process.

Voters would have to submit their driver’s license number, their state identification card, or the last four digits of their Social Security number on the ballot envelope. If the voter lacks a government ID, the bill requires a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter.

Under the new bill, voters would be able to request an absentee ballot up to 78 days before the election, instead of the current 180 days
. The absentee ballots and early votes must be received by 11 days prior to the election day.

The government, including election officials, would not be allowed to mail out unsolicited applications for absentee ballots to voters under the bill. Only authorized relatives or persons signing as helping a voter who is illiterate or physically disabled may apply on behalf of another for an absentee ballot application .

Election officials also must not send out absentee ballots until four weeks prior to the election.

Other Requirements

To help reduce Georgia’s runoff period to four weeks, instead of nine weeks as experienced by the state in the Jan. 2 runoff elections for two Senate seats, military and overseas voters would be offered ranked choice voting.

Drop boxes would still be allowed under the new bill but subject to a number of restrictions. There would be a limited number of drop boxes, where every county would have at least one drop box but no more than one per 100,000 active voters or one for each early voting site. Any given drop box must be located at the office of the board of registrars or absentee ballot clerk, or indoors at an early voting site. The drop boxes are only open when those sites are open and be under constant surveillance “by an election official or his or her designee, law enforcement official, or licensed security guard.”

Voters cast their early voting ballot at drop box outside of City Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Oct. 17, 2020. (Mark Makela/Getty Images)
The proposed legislation would change Georgia’s early voting period to business hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. starting about three weeks before election day, and registrars would have the option to extend voting hours to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. The bill would also limit weekend voting to the second Saturday before the election. Counties can also choose the third Saturday or third Sunday before election day as another weekend day.

The HB 531 will no longer count any provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct—a change from the current law, which stipulates that even if the ballot was cast in the wrong precinct, election officials can count the votes for races in which the voter was entitled to vote.

Per the bill, ballots would be required to be printed on “security paper that incorporates features which can be used to authenticate the ballot as an official ballot but which do not make the ballot identifiable to a particular elector.“

Election superintendents and boards of registrars are not allowed to accept any “funding, grants, or gifts from any source other than from the governing authority of the county or municipality, the State of Georgia, or the federal government,” under the bill.

Among other voting requirements, the bill also prohibits people to solicit votes, distribute or show any campaign material, or provide money or gifts—including food and drink—within 25 feet of voters standing in line at any polling place, and within 150 feet of any polling place.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pelosi Praises H.R. 1 as Means to Curb ‘Misinformation’ on Climate Change, Gun Control
5
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 28: U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) (2nd L) speaks to members of the media as (L-R) Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) listen at the lobby of Longworth House Office Building November 28, 2018 in Washington, DC. …
Alex Wong/Getty Images
HANNAH BLEAU4 Mar 202121

House Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) on Thursday celebrated the House passing H.R. 1, which the GOP warns will federalize state elections and lead to greater distrust in the U.S. election system, branding it as key to curbing “misinformation” on Democrat priorities such as climate change and gun control.

“We are so pleased with the actions taken by the House of Representatives last night,” Pelosi told reporters at her Thursday press conference, stating that lawmakers made a “giant step for democracy.”

The Speaker claimed that the legislation will “protect the right to vote” by removing “obstacles of participation” — a likely reference to the measure’s federal takeover of state voting procedures, particularly overriding state voter ID laws.

“H.R. 1, For the People, the first 300 pages were written by John Lewis to remove voter suppression tactics from our political system. Some of the rest of it was written to protect the integrity of our electoral system, the physical infrastructure of our elections,” Pelosi said, contending that the measure reduces the role of special interest money — something she seems to believe will help advance her party’s initiatives, from climate change to gun control:
What’s exciting about it is it restores confidence that people have that their vote and their voice is as important as anyone’s. That yes. We can address the climate crisis if big, dark special interest money is not suffocating the airwaves with misinformation about how to protect the planet. We yes can have background checks passed in the whole Congress of the United States to protect our children if big, dark special interest gun lobbying money is not sucffucoating the airwaves. And yes, we can have lower cost of prescription drugs. The list goes on and on. We can ‘Build Back Better’ for the people in every zip code as we said in our caucus yesterday.
Countless Republicans have warned against H.R. 1 due to the impact it would have on states and their primary role in conducting federal elections for House and Senate and presidential elections. Twenty state attorneys general sent a letter to House and Senate leadership prior to the measure’s passing, highlighting the bill’s many “vulnerabilities” and constitutional red flags.
As Breitbart News reported:
H.R. 1, they continued, “implicates the Electors Clause” by regulating the elections for president and vice president. The state leaders also highlighted the “severe constitutional hurdles” the measure faces due to its “regulation of congressional elections, including by mandating mail-in voting, requiring states to accept late ballots, overriding state voter identification (“ID”) laws, and mandating that states conduct redistricting through unelected commissions.”
The attorneys general identified the measure’s limitations on voter ID laws as, perhaps, the most “egregious” portion of the act, noting that a majority of states have some form of a voter ID law.
The state leaders warned that they will “seek legal remedies to protect the Constitution, the sovereignty of all states, our elections, and the rights of our citizens” if the bill does, in fact, become law.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) is among GOP lawmakers who spoke most forcefully against the bill following its passage, stating that Americans should be “outraged” by House Democrats passing the proposal:
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING: Trump makes new claims about why GOP lost U.S. Senate races in Georgia

"Republicans did not turn out to vote because they were so angry and disappointed ..." the former president said.

Updated: March 4, 2021 - 3:14pm

After Election Day 2020, which political party controlled the Senate was yet to be decided. Two races in Georgia went in to runoffs with Republicans holding 50 seats and Democrats controlling 48.

Republicans needed to win just one of the runoffs for full control. They lost both.
The two races, decided on Jan. 5, came after two solid months of former President Trump charging that fraud and voting irregularities cost him the election.

But Trump on Thursday sought to explain the losses.

"To set the record straight, there were two reasons the Senate races were lost in Georgia," Trump said in a statement through his Save America group. "First, Republicans did not turn out to vote because they were so angry and disappointed with Georgia Republican leadership and Governor [Brian] Kemp for failing to stand up to Stacey Abrams and the disastrous Consent Decree that virtually eliminated signature verification requirements across the state (and much worse), and was not approved by the State Legislature as required by the Constitution – having a major impact on the result, a rigged election.

"Second, Senator Mitch McConnell’s refusal to go above $600 per person on the stimulus check payments when the two Democrat opponents were touting $2,000 per person in ad after ad. This latter point was used against our Senators and the $2,000 will be approved anyway by the Democrats who bought the Georgia election — and McConnell let them do it!"

The former president also blamed "ineffective TV ads" as a reason the GOP failed to hold onto the two Georgia seats.

"Even more stupidly, the National Republican Senatorial Committee spent millions of dollars on ineffective TV ads starring Mitch McConnell, the most unpopular politician in the country, who only won in Kentucky because President Trump endorsed him. He would have lost badly without this endorsement," he said.

Trump also took aim at a conservative newspaper, saying it has lost "great credibility."

"The Wall Street Journal editorial page continues, knowingly, to fight for globalist policies such as bad trade deals, open borders, and endless wars that favor other countries and sell out our great American workers, and they fight for RINOS that have so badly hurt the Republican Party," Trump said. "That's where they are and that's where they will always be. Fortunately, nobody cares much about The Wall Street Journal editorial anymore. They have lost great credibility."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Over 400,000 ballots have no chain of custody in GA 2:22 min
Bannons War Room Published March 4, 2021 1,688 Views

Rumble — Michael Patrick Leahy, editor-in-chief of Star News, reports four months later, Georgia has failed to produce chain of custody documents on over 400,000 mail-in ballots.

________________________________________

Kline: GA Election Bill won't keep Facebook's CEO out of our Elections 9:11 min
Kline: GA Election Bill won't keep Facebook's CEO out of our Elections
Bannons War Room Published March 3, 2021 1,921 Views

Rumble — Phill Kline joins the War Room to talk about the private hand in our elections
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtDEU3QYfug
58:05 min
Interview with John Sullivan....with receipts!
•Mar 4, 2021


PT News Network


John Sullivan has been a fixture at protests and riots in the past year as an organizer and participant. He is currently facing federal charges for his role in the January 6th, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol, but claims that he was acting in his role as a journalist. In this interview, he attempts to push that narrative, but the facts tell another story. PT News Network has covered Sullivan for several months before he was in the national spotlight. While he claims to be a journalist, it seems as if he is more interested in profiting from his crimes. He recently sold his footage of the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt for over $80k to several news stations and is now promoting a book and documentary about the Capitol riots.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Fake News ABC Desperately Tries to Drum Up Controversy After 4 Trump Supporters Show Up to ‘Planned March 4th Insurrection’ at US Capitol

By Cristina Laila
Published March 4, 2021 at 5:45pm
IMG_9011.jpg

The fake news media is at it again.

ABC News desperately tried to drum up some drama after virtually no one showed up to the US Capitol on Thursday.

Earlier this week Capitol Police increased security based on suspicious ‘intel’ warning of a militia plot to breach the Capitol on March 4.

Thousands of National Guard troops are currently protecting the Capitol that is surrounded by fencing and razor wire – but it’s not enough.

The Capitol Police claimed that there was intel warning of a new plan to attack the Capitol building.

According to Fox 5 DC, “sources” said they received an intelligence bulletin warning that Three Percenters were planning on breaching the Capitol on Thursday, March 4.

March 4 is the original day on which the US inaugurated presidents so QAnon followers believe Trump will be in DC this Thursday to be sworn in on the 4th, according to Fox 5 DC.

FOUR peaceful Trump supporters showed up to the US Capitol on Thursday and ABC News made it sound like a five alarm fire.

“High security at US Capitol as Trump supporters gather hoping for his return to power” ABC said with a photo of National Guard troops.

1614905643753.png

Here’s what’s really going on at the US Capitol (it’s just media):

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1367548414125371394
.23 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

— NEWS —
Trump, Giuliani Served In Civil Rights Lawsuit Over Capitol Riot
By Joseph Curl
Mar 4, 2021 DailyWire.com

BEDMINSTER TOWNSHIP, NJ - NOVEMBER 20: (L to R) Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani and president-elect Donald Trump head into the clubhouse for their meeting at Trump International Golf Club, November 20, 2016 in Bedminster Township, New Jersey. Trump and his transition team are in the process of filling cabinet and other high level positions for the new administration. (Photo by
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Former President Donald Trump and his longtime lawyer Rudy Giuliani have been served in a civil rights lawsuit that claims Trump conspired with Giuliani and far-right extremist groups in an attempt to stop Congress from certifying the results of the 2020 election.

Lawyers for Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MI), who serves as chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and the NAACP delivered the lawsuit to the former president at Mar-a-Lago, The Daily Beast reported Wednesday. Giuliani’s lawyer, Joseph D. Sibley, accepted the papers on behalf of the former mayor of New York.

“The Defendants conspired to prevent, by force, intimidation and threats, the Plaintiff, as a Member of Congress, from discharging his official duties to approve the count of votes cast by members of the Electoral College following the presidential election,” the lawsuit alleges. The suit also accuses Trump and Giuliani of acting “in concert to incite and then carry out a riot at the Capitol” that “created grave danger of harm” to Thompson and other lawmakers in the Capitol.
The suit goes on to say Trump “solicited the support of, and endorsed the belligerent and violent actions of, organizations such as the Proud Boys that expressed support of his reelection.”
Trump in January was impeached by the House for inciting a riot. The article of impeachment said “On January 6, 2021, pursuant to the 12th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, the House of Representatives, and the Senate met at the United States Capitol for a Joint Session of Congress to count the votes of the Electoral College. In the months preceding the Joint Session, President Trump repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.” The article continued:
Shortly before the Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at the Ellipse in Washington, DC. There, he reiterated false claims that “we won this election, and we won it by a landslide.” He also willfully made statements that, in context, encour6 aged—and foreseeably resulted in—lawless action at the Capitol, such as: “if you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore.” Thus incited by President Trump, members of the crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives, interfere with the Joint Session’s solemn constitutional duty to certify the results of the 2020 Presidential election, unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive, and seditious acts.
On Jan. 6, thousands of Trump supporters — many wearing “Make America Great Again” hats, some decked out in camo attire, others carrying Confederate flags — gathered on the Ellipse, a patch of the National Mall between the Washington Monument and the White House. The crowd roared when Giuliani took the stage about 10 a.m. The former New York City mayor whipped the crowd into a frenzy when he said he was “willing to stake my reputation” that election fraud handed the 2020 election to Biden.

“And if we’re wrong, we will be made fools of,” Giuliani said. “But if we’re right, a lot of them will go to jail. So let’s have trial by combat.”

Trump later appeared, claiming that the “emboldened radical left Democrats” and the media have conspired against him. He declared, “We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede. Our country is had enough. We will not take it anymore, and that’s what this is all about.”

Trump said he lost the election because of an “explosion of bulls***.” The crowd responded by chanting, “Bulls***!”

Trump also pointed toward the Capitol down Constitution Avenue, saying: “After this, we’re going to walk down there, and I’ll be there with you, we’re going to walk down … to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

UCLA student invaded Capitol as Groyper member, FBI affidavit states

In this Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, violent rioters supporting President Donald Trump, storm the Capitol in Washington. A faction of local, county and state Republican officials across the country is pushing lies, misinformation and conspiracy theories online that echo those that helped inspire the violent Capitol insurrection, forcing the GOP into an internal reckoning.. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)
In this Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, violent rioters supporting President Donald Trump, storm the Capitol in Washington. A faction of local, county and state Republican officials across the country is pushing lies, misinformation and conspiracy theories online that ... more >

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Sunday, February 28, 2021

Justice Department court filings have singled out fringe-right Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys for instigating the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

On Friday the department highlighted a third group: the “Groypers” — a young following of “alt-right” podcaster Nicholas J. Fuentes.

Mr. Fuentes arrived Saturday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida, only to be blocked by security.

“CPAC sucks,” he said.

The Justice Department released an indictment of Christian Secor, a UCLA undergraduate and Groyper activist who founded the America First Bruins on campus.

Mr. Secor, indicted on 10 offenses, was a prominent Capitol invader, pushing a gaggle of pro-Trump supporters into the building, carrying an “America First” flag up crowded hallways and occupying the Senate president’s chair.

An FBI affidavit presenting evidence to justify Mr. Secor‘s arrest is not limited to his actions that day. The agent also notes his right-wing political views, referring to him as a Groyper.

Groypers, named after a cartoon frog, follow a hard-right nationalist agenda that is at odds with the Republican Party and mainstream conservatism. Mr. Fuentes is credited with founding the loosely aligned group, whose key aim is to infiltrate Republican Party thought.

On his Twitter account, Mr. Fuentes retweeted a short video of himself and his boisterous followers showing up at CPAC, whose security would not let him enter Orlando’s Hyatt Regency hotel. He made a brief provocative statement, then marched off with his group, who chanted “America First, America First.”

“CPAC is not conservative,” Mr. Fuentes said. “CPAC sucks. It’s gay.”

Later, he exited hotel grounds in a convertible. “I walked up to the front door and they kicked me out,” he told his supporters in a video posted by Orlando Weekly. “At AFPAC [America First Political Action Committee], we don’t have homosexuals speaking on stage.”

“Jesus Christ is sovereign over everything,” he said.

Groypers oppose the mainstream message of such young people’s groups as Turning Point USA, led by Charlie Kirk and dedicated to spreading conservative values to high school and college students.

Mr. Fuentes is often derided on Twitter by established conservative activists and opinion writers who view him as an extremist and anti-Semitic.

“The Groypers are a network of alt right figures who are vocal supporters of white supremacist and ‘America First’ podcaster Nick Fuentes,” states the FBI affidavit for Mr. Secor‘s arrest.

The FBI identified Mr. Secor with help of anonymous UCLA students. One informant submitted a photograph of the defendant at a pre-Jan. 6 rally in Huntington Beach, California, attended by a number of self-described Groypers.

The FBI used a New Yorker magazine invasion video and U.S. Capitol Police closed-circuit television surveillance to track Mr. Secor‘s movements though the Capitol building.

A college tipster told the FBI: “Secor is known to follow an extreme ideology and invite white nationalists to speak at engagements on campus.”

After the riot, Mr. Secor returned to California, moved back home with his mother, ditched his phone and car, and “bragged that he would not be caught for his involvement at the U.S. Capitol,” the affidavit says, quoting a longtime friend.

The affidavit’s most damning political evidence is screenshots of Mr. Secor‘s Twitter account, @fullautonat. Twitter says that account does not currently exist.

The FBI agent writes that Mr. Secor describes fascism as “epic,” states that he supports “nationalism everywhere” and “suggests Jews and the state of Israel control the politics of other governments.”

Other FBI affidavits have described militia members of the Oath Keepers from Ohio and Virginia as the group that actively planned to break into the Capitol weeks before the rally. The aim was to stop Congress from certifying the Electoral College victory for President Biden.

Former President Donald Trump had wanted former Vice President Mike Pence, who presided over the joint session of Congress, to send the vote back to battleground states where legislatures would elect him for a second term. Mr. Pence refused, saying he had no such power.

FBI affidavits also have presented evidence against the Proud Boys, a sometimes violent right-wing nationalist group whose members were seen breaking into the Capitol.

The Secor indictment accuses him of assaulting a police officer, illegally entering the Capitol building, illegally entering the Senate floor and gallery, and disorderly conduct.

The Secor affidavit gave a recap of Jan. 6: “In the course of these events, approximately 81 members of the Capitol Police and 58 members of the Metropolitan Police Department were assaulted.

Additionally, one subject was shot and killed while attempting to enter the House chamber through broken windows; many media members were assaulted and had cameras and other news gathering equipment destroyed; and the Capitol suffered millions of dollars in damage — including broken windows and doors, graffiti, and residue of various pepper sprays, tear gas, and fire extinguishers deployed both by crowd members who stormed the Capitol and by Capitol Police officers trying to restore order.”

Capitol Police estimate that 10,000 Trump supporters marched to the Capitol on Jan. 6 and about 800 entered the building.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Ashli Babbitt’s Legal Team Releases First Official Press Release

By Tayler Hansen
Published March 4, 2021 at 6:51pm
IMG_7601.jpg

Ashli Babbitt’s legal team issued their first press release in response to the deadly shooting of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt by a Capitol Hill police lieutenant.

PRESS RELEASE

The shooting of Ashli Babbitt on January 6, 2021 by an unidentified U.S. Capitol Police Officer was an unjustified use of deadly force which violated her constitutional rights. It is clear from video footage that Ashli did not pose a danger to the officer, or any other person, when she was shot. Ashli was unarmed. She did not assault anyone. She did not threaten to harm anyone. There was no excuse for taking her life.

It is a universal law enforcement standard that a police officer should use no more force than necessary to accomplish a lawful purpose. At 5′ 2″ tall and 110 pounds, an arrest of Ashli could have been accomplished by a single trained officer with a set of handcuffs. At the time of the shooting, there were over a half-dozen police officers in close proximity to the Speaker’s door where Ashli was standing. Some of those officers had just allowed protesters access to the door by stepping aside. Other officers, dressed in full tactical gear, stood among the protesters just a few feet behind the door. Still others stood casually at the opposite end of the Speaker’s Lobby, unconcerned with the activities of Ashli and the protesters around her. All of these officers were in a position to have aided in the apprehension of Ashli if it was necessary. Given her background as a 14-year veteran of the Air Force, it is likely that Ashli would have complied with simple verbal commands, thereby making the use of any force unnecessary.

However, the officer who shot Ashli never attempted to arrest her. Nor did he call on his fellow officers to arrest her. Instead, he fired a shot into her chest. Witnesses confirm that the officer did not give Ashli a single verbal warning prior to firing. In fact, Ashli was not even aware that the officer was present, as he was located in the doorway of a room off to the side of her field of vision.
To date, the officer who shot Ashli has not been identified. Neither the Capitol Police nor any other governmental authority has given an account of the facts surrounding the shooting.

There has been no official explanation or justification for the use of lethal force in this matter.

This lack of transparency impedes the public scrutiny which is necessary to hold government officials accountable in a free society. It also interferes with the ability of Ashli’s family to obtain justice for their loss.

My law firm and I represent Ashli’s husband and family members. We will continue to investigate this matter. We intend to take appropriate legal action when our investigation has been completed. We call upon the Capitol Police as well as the United States Congress to make public the facts and circumstances of Ashli’s shooting.

If you have information regarding this matter, you may contact us and receive updates on Twitter at Justice for Ashli Babbitt @ForAshli. Emails can also be to the address alone.
Terrell N. Roberts, III
Roberts and Wood
Riverdale, Maryland
robertsandwoodfirm@gmail.com

1614911605799.png

If you or anyone you know have unreleased footage or pictures that can help further Ashli Babbitt’s Legal Investigation you can submit them to:

ForAshliTips@aol.com
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dems Claim Threat of Massive March 4th Insurrection – Shut Down Business for the Day – Weak Republicans Too Afraid to Ask for Intel Supporting This Crazy Accusation

By Joe Hoft
Published March 4, 2021 at 6:35pm
Raheem-Kassam-in-DC.jpg

The Republicans are so pathetically weak. The Democrats claim there are going to be 50,000 insurrectionists in DC today and they all go home. No one is demanding the garbage intel that supports these accusations.

Raheem Kassam was on the War Room with Steve Bannon and he reported from Washington today:

At the 3:30 mark in the video below Kasseem says:
We have yet to hear explanations from Capitol Hill about why precisely these members of the National Guard still have to be here. We haven’t heard the actual details of the intelligence. We’ve heard little nuggets, oh we’re expecting 50,000 people…
After noting no people were there, Raheem shared at the 4:00 mark:
If this day passes without incident, will they tear down these walls?
Steve Bannon then shared at the 4:45 minute mark:
We never got the intelligence reports on why we have the National Guard here today fully up-armored and armed: 5 to 7,000 troops. Why do we have the official barricade and the fencing and the razor wire? But now they’ve raised it up, and I think McCarthy and these people, I don’t see the demands by Mitch McConnell, McCarthy and quite frankly the House is running away and the Senate is still there.
What is the intelligence , more than intelligence, the chatter? This is, this is a smeering of the American people. They’re talking about some crazy thing about March 4th still being the inauguration day and Donald Trump is going to be inaugurated. Those are all lies and all smear and all spin.
Rumble video 48:50 min

Democrats and corrupt and weak members of the Republican Party are happy to claim that those who voted for President Trump in record numbers are white nationalists. The Democrats steal the election and these same people claim Trump supporters are racist because they are outraged their votes were stolen. But the problem is there are Republicans that go along with these lies.

Where is the pushback? Why are only one or two members of Congress standing up and calling this sham what it is? There was no mob in DC today, none. It’s all another lie just like Joe Biden is competent and not senile and Joe Biden won the election. Americans see through this garbage. Unfortunately, there is no one who is calling BS BS.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The disavowal of a March 4 "Insurrection" is "disinformation," and has been totally "debunked" by Mainstream Media - who says "informed sources assure us that there will be an insurrection of those nasty Trump Terrorists."

Meanwhile, `10 pm EST shows the streets of Washington DC continue empty. If there is going to be an insurrection and Trump "installed", the insurrectionists better hurry up as they have two hours to do it.

full


Circle outside the Capital Building above. Refresh 1 minute.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Michelle Obama Urges Senate to Vote for HR1 – The Democrat Bill that Brings Communist Third World Voting Rules to US Elections

By Joe Hoft
Published March 5, 2021 at 7:15am
Michelle-Obama-1.jpg

Michelle Obama demands the US Senate pass a garbage bill on elections that will make the US a banana republic with tainted elections for the next 1,000 years.

Was literally every move made by the Obamas one that destroyed American and took it closer to communism? Name one that didn’t,

The Obamas’ latest effort is praising the outrageous HR1 bill just passed by Democrats in the US House. The bill is an American nightmare as we’ve reported for weeks:


After stealing the 2020 election, Democrats want to make the steal permanent. Per the article above, this bill will:
  • force Internet-only registration,
  • remove SSN requirements,
  • provide motor vehicle registration for everyone,
  • create nationwide same-day registration,
  • allow children and felons to vote,
  • legalize nationwide ballot harvesting,
  • ban voter id,
  • and much more.
So it is no surprise the Obamas support it and probably had something to do with writing it.
Yesterday Michelle Obama tweeted her support for the horribly unjust bill and demanded the Senate join in passing it:

1614975416665.png
According to FOX News:
H.R. 1 passed by a 220-210 vote along party lines. Senate Democrats will need to secure support from at least 10 Republicans in order to bypass the filibuster and pass the bill.
After stealing the 2020 election, the Democrats now want to lock in their power for centuries. The only people locked in should be all those involved in the stealing of the 2020 election from President Trump.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

MUST READ… Julie Kelly at American Greatness: A Family on Trial for January 6

By Jim Hoft
Published March 5, 2021 at 9:06am

A Family on Trial for January 6
bruno-cua-2.jpg

Reprinted with permission from the Center for American Greatness, Inc.
By Julie Kelly

The Justice Department, which acts more like a consigliere for the Democratic Party than an impartial enforcer of the rule of law, wants to ruin the Cua family and send a message to others.


A Family on Trial for January 6

Bruno Joseph Cua lives on a three-acre farm in central Georgia with his parents and two younger siblings. The 18-year-old likes to fish and build tree houses; neighbors, family friends, and classmates describe him as hard-working, kind, respectful, and patriotic. He’s not into drugs or alcohol—his biggest high last year was organizing Trump truck rallies in his community.

Before he traveled to Washington, D.C. on January 5 with his mom and dad to hear President Trump’s speech the next day, Bruno was finishing online classes to earn his high school diploma. (His mother, a veterinarian, stopped working years ago to homeschool her children.) Like many teenagers interested in politics, Bruno is a bit of a rabble-rouser and social media loudmouth.

The Cuas, after hearing the president’s speech on January 6, walked to Capitol Hill. Bruno made his way into the building; the teen later posted on Parler that he “stormed the capital (sic) with hundreds of thousands of patriots. Yes we physically fought our way in.”

Now, Bruno Cua sits in jail in Washington, D.C. awaiting trial for his involvement in the January 6 Capitol breach, the youngest of the nearly 300 people so far arrested under the U.S. Justice Department’s “unprecedented” investigation into the events of that day. Unlike tens of thousands of protestors who occupied the nation’s capital for months—including young people who bragged about it in a Washington Post magazine—Cua will be given no mercy.
Neither will his parents, Joseph and Alise.

A Social Media Menace?

Bruno was arrested on February 5 by FBI agents in Atlanta—a grand jury indicted the high schooler on 12 counts, including assaulting a police officer and possessing a “dangerous or deadly” weapon. For the first three weeks following his arrest, Cua languished in solitary confinement before being transported to a jail in Oklahoma City where he shared a cell with 30 other inmates. His family, like the families of dozens of January 6 defendants, has been denied the opportunity to post bail.

And there’s a chance the teen will remain behind bars until at least May when his trial is scheduled to begin. U.S. District Court Judge Randy Moss is weighing whether to finally release Bruno back to his parents or keep him detained for at least another two months. Moss seems inclined to side with government lawyers who insist Bruno is a danger to the community based on social media posts expressing outrage at the election, mocking Democrats including Joe Biden, and encouraging protestors to bring “pepper spray, tasers, baseball bats” to the capital—big talk for a kid traveling with his mom and dad. Some of the posts being used as evidence against him, in fact, are dated after January 6.

But, according to federal prosecutors, his rants on Parler make Bruno a national menace. “This small sample of public social media posts on the platform Parler by the defendant in this case evinces a full picture of who this defendant really is: a radicalized man with violent tendencies and no remorse for his participation in the violent insurrection that occurred at the U.S.
Capitol,” assistant U.S. Attorney Kimberly Paschall wrote in objection to Bruno’s pretrial release.

bruno-cua.jpg

Further, Bruno’s refusal to accept that Joe Biden fairly won the presidency is more proof he should stay in jail, prosecutors say. “The offenses committed by the defendant illuminate characteristics inconsistent with a person who could follow orders given by this Court, or indeed, any branch of the federal government. The defendant has espoused disbelief in the outcome of the 2020 Presidential election, and violently acted on that world view.” (The government, both judges and lawyers, routinely cite a defendant’s doubt about last year’s election as evidence of wrongdoing.)

The criminal case against Bruno, however, is weak. Did he act badly? Yes. He climbed on scaffolding outside the Capitol building and went into areas he should not have entered; some of his social media posts are alarming but not against the law.

Does his conduct merit the necessity of a first-time offender spending months in jail even before he has a chance to defend himself? Absolutely not.

Thin Evidence, Government Intimidation

Bruno faces three weapons charges—he carried a small baton into the building but did not use it either to attack anyone or vandalize the building—and various trespassing misdemeanors. The evidence presented in charging documents is shockingly thin, considering he’s been incarcerated for one month as of Friday, and it leans heavily on video taken by a New Yorker reporter and Bruno’s own Instagram account.

Investigators accuse Bruno of shoving a police officer in a hallway; the officer involved cannot recall what the perpetrators looked like but the FBI claims to have video evidence. “He is not alleged to have participated in the violent breach of police lines, breaking windows, or otherwise forcefully entering the Capitol,” Bruno’s lawyers argued in a petition for pretrial release. “He is not accused of using the baton or engaging in any other physical violence, property damage, or theft.”

The government doesn’t just view young Bruno as a threat but also characterizes his parents as threats. Bruno’s father was interrogated by federal prosecutors about his private conversations with his son after the riot, demanding to know why he and his wife didn’t stop him from entering the Capitol, what punishment he faced once they returned home, and why they didn’t do a better job monitoring his social media accounts. Joseph Cua described their frantic attempts to contact their son while he was inside the Capitol, to no avail as cell service was shut down.

Here was one exchange from a February 12 detention hearing between Joseph Cua and an assistant U.S. attorney about a post-election rally he and his son attended.

Cua: It was a rally around . . . the election results, we should see the real results and that type of thing.

U.S. government: Do you recognize that that is not true?
Cua: Yes, I do.

U.S. government: But you recognize also that you participated in that activity with your son? Do you share in the responsibility in your son’s belief and his actions?

In other words, attending a rally is a crime and taking your son is akin to mental child abuse not to mention the audacity to question election results.

“We Are Completely Broken”

Astoundingly, one prosecutor suggested Bruno had been politically brainwashed by his parents because he doesn’t attend school outside the home. “I don’t believe that home incarceration will work because he is an 18-year-old who’s homeschooled,” assistant U.S. Attorney Ryan Buchanan told a magistrate judge last month. “And so this case did not arise out of him traveling or going different places. It’s simply these things that he has ingested, not just from the Internet.”

Therefore, Buchanan argued, “they are not suitable custodians in part because they may have participated in some of this activity as well.”

At one point, the government warned that Joseph and Alise could be in trouble, too. “It would not be a stretch to say these parents could be charged with crimes of their own, not merely for aiding and abetting the activities of their son, but for unlawful entry on the Capitol grounds if in fact, as the defendant’s father testified under oath, they were present in the restricted area of the Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021.”

Perhaps the government can throw Bruno’s parents in jail, too, leaving their two younger children to the tender mercies of the foster care system?

The Cua case has nothing to do with seeking justice for the melee on January 6 or appropriately prosecuting one of the participants. It has nothing to do with making sure the nation’s capital or Cua’s hometown remains safe.

It has everything to do with punishing a family who dared to show up in support of Donald Trump and dared to question the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

The Justice Department, which acts more like a consigliere for the Democratic Party than an impartial enforcer of the rule of law, wants to ruin the Cua family and send a message to others.

Despite no criminal record and nearly 50 letters testifying to his good character, Bruno Cua continues to suffer in prison while his family awaits word as to whether he can come home. (The Cuas have offered to put up their home as bond.)

“Since he has been arrested, everything has changed for us,” a tearful Alise Cua told Judge Moss this week. “We just want our family together. I don’t even want to even hear the word politics. Bruno feels the same way.”

“We are completely broken.”

And that’s exactly what the U.S. Justice Department wants.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed

Michelle Obama Urges Senate to Vote for HR1 – The Democrat Bill that Brings Communist Third World Voting Rules to US Elections

By Joe Hoft
Published March 5, 2021 at 7:15am
Michelle-Obama-1.jpg

Michelle Obama demands the US Senate pass a garbage bill on elections that will make the US a banana republic with tainted elections for the next 1,000 years.

Was literally every move made by the Obamas one that destroyed American and took it closer to communism? Name one that didn’t,

The Obamas’ latest effort is praising the outrageous HR1 bill just passed by Democrats in the US House. The bill is an American nightmare as we’ve reported for weeks:


After stealing the 2020 election, Democrats want to make the steal permanent. Per the article above, this bill will:
  • force Internet-only registration,
  • remove SSN requirements,
  • provide motor vehicle registration for everyone,
  • create nationwide same-day registration,
  • allow children and felons to vote,
  • legalize nationwide ballot harvesting,
  • ban voter id,
  • and much more.
So it is no surprise the Obamas support it and probably had something to do with writing it.
Yesterday Michelle Obama tweeted her support for the horribly unjust bill and demanded the Senate join in passing it:

View attachment 255386
According to FOX News:

After stealing the 2020 election, the Democrats now want to lock in their power for centuries. The only people locked in should be all those involved in the stealing of the 2020 election from President Trump.
What is to keep ANYONE from registering to vote multiple times? Each time under a slightly different alias?
"Yes, we have Dobbin1, Dobbin2, Dobbin3, Dobbin4, Dobbin5 living here at the farm. I admit the naming is funny. If George Foreman can do it why not me? HAY, you're not denying a being the right to vote are you with these questions?"

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Weirdo Dem Rep. Eric Swalwell Files Lawsuit Against Trump and Allies Over Jan. 6 Capitol Breach

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published March 5, 2021 at 10:51am
trump-and-flags.jpg

Weirdo Rep. Eric Swalwell has filed a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Rep. Mo Brooks and Rudy Giuliani over the January 6th storming of the Capitol.


Swalwell, who remains in office despite having an inappropriate relationship with a Chinese spy, filed the 65-page lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., on Friday.

Each of the people named in the lawsuit spoke at the rally that took place prior to the breach.

“The horrific events of January 6 were a direct and foreseeable consequence of the Defendants’ unlawful actions,” the complaint says. “As such, the Defendants are responsible for the injury and destruction that followed.”

Today, I filed a civil claim against Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Rudolph Giuliani, and Rep. Mo Brooks for inciting an attack against the Capitol that terrorized lawmakers and prevented us from certifying the votes of the American people.
My statement: pic.twitter.com/3BkbvX8WHe
— Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) March 5, 2021
The Hill reports that the “lawsuit seeks unspecified money damages and asks for a court order requiring Trump and his allies to provide at least a week’s notice before holding any future rally in D.C. related to an election.”

“Among the allegations contained in the nine-count complaint is that defendants conspired to prevent lawmakers and then-Vice President Mike Pence from certifying President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris’s election win, in violation of a federal civil rights law,” the report continues.

Former President Trump was acquitted by the Senate over his role in the Jan. 6 protest.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

TRUTH: Texas Attorney General Paxton Says “No Election Fraud” Myth Is Driven By Lack of Investigations

By Jim Hoft
Published March 5, 2021 at 11:25am
election-fraud-2020-ballots-ga-tcf.jpg
Democrat election violations: (left to right) Secret ballot counting in Georgia, Secret ballot deliveries at 3:30 AM in Detroit, Blocking observers from viewing inside the TCF Center in Detroit

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton joined One America News on Thursday to discuss the unprecedented fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

AG Paxton told Chanel Rion the “no election fraud” myth is driven by the lack of investigations. The Texas Attorney General then added that the Project Veritas investigation helped his state press charges against a woman who admitted on camera to voter fraud in 7,000 cases.

CNN is leading the mainstream media efforts to protect Democrats from this fact — that the 2020 election was the greatest political scandal in US history.

paxton-voter-fraud.jpg


Via Pro-Trump News:

Rumble video 4:26 min

We all know what the BIG LIE is.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Victors Of Mail-In Ballot Election Indicted For Stealing, Faking Votes.
ELECTION
Four men were indicted by New Jersey’s Attorney General for mail-in ballot fraud.

The charges come from a May 12th, 2020 special election in the city of Paterson, which was conducted entirely by mail-in ballots.

Among the individuals charged are Councilman Michael Jackson and Councilman Alex Mendez.

“It is alleged that Jackson and Mendez violated state election laws as candidates by approaching one or more voters in Paterson in the districts where they were running and collecting their official mail-in ballots for delivery to the Passaic County Board of Elections. It is further alleged that these mail-in ballots were delivered to the Board of Elections without information identifying the bearer, in violation of state election laws,” local news reports.
“In addition, Jackson, 48, and Mendez, 45, allegedly procured and had in their possession official mail-in ballots which were neither their own ballots, nor ballots for which they were identified as an authorized bearer. Mendez also allegedly procured or submitted one or more voter registration applications, which he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, in that he knew the person for whom the application was procured was not eligible to vote in the election district identified on the application,” a summary adds.

Shelim Khalique, 51, and Abu Razyen, 21 were also charged with criminal conduct involving mail-in ballots during the election.

Khalique approached residents in Paterson’s 2nd Ward to collect and deliver mail-in ballots despite failing to properly verify them.

“In addition, Khalique and the bus company he owns, A-1 Elegant Tours, Inc., d/b/a Eastern Star Transportation, LLC, were charged today with contract fraud and other crimes in a separate investigation by OPIA, the New Jersey State Police, Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, and Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office,” the summary adds.

Rayzen allegedly procured and possessed several mail-in ballots “which were not his own and for which he was not identified as an authorized bearer.”

“Investigators obtained a USB drive containing a video of Razyen holding and flipping through a stack of more than three official mail-in ballot outer envelopes that did not have the bearer portion completed,” local reporting added.

The case was cited by Donald Trump’s campaign in its unsuccessful lawsuit to stop New Jersey’s vote-by-mail plan for the presidential election.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: Capitol Rioters Armed with Bear Spray, Not Guns

167
Riot police push back a crowd of supporters of US President Donald Trump after they stormed the Capitol building on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. - Donald Trump's supporters stormed a session of Congress held today, January 6, to certify Joe Biden's election win, triggering unprecedented chaos and violence …
File Photo: ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images
AWR HAWKINS4 Mar 2021283

A report by the Washington Examiner’s Byron York outlines January’s Capitol rioters were armed with bear spray, not guns.

York notes readers and news watchers may have the impression rioters had guns, as the riots are frequently described as an “armed insurrection.” In fact, York did a data search to find the phrase “armed insurrection” was used “2,339 times since January 6” to describe the riots.

However, he points out “the armed insurrectionists did not use any firearms.”

What York did find is that “a small number” of those taking part in the riots “did indeed have baseball bats or bear spray, and a few used flagsticks or even, in one case, a crutch as weapons to assault Capitol police.”

Bear spray, crutches, etc., but no guns.

York recounted a line of questioning Wednesday between Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and FBI assistant director for counterterrorism Jill Sanborn about firearm arrests or shots fired during the Capitol riots:
JOHNSON: How many firearms were confiscated in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds during that day?
SANBORN: To my knowledge, we have not recovered any on that day from any other arrests at the scene at this point. But I don’t want to speak on behalf of Metro and Capitol Police. But to my knowledge, none.
JOHNSON: So nobody has been charged with an actual firearm weapon in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds?
SANBORN: Correct. The closest we came was the vehicle that had the Molotov cocktails in it. And when we did a search of that vehicle later on, there was a weapon.
JOHNSON: How many shots were fired that we know of?
SANBORN: I believe the only shots that were fired were the ones that results in the death of the one lady.
On January 6, 2021, Breitbart News reported the name of the woman who was killed was Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year veteran who served four tours with the U.S. Airforce. Her husband told KUSI News that Babbitt was a strong supporter of President Donald Trump and a great patriot to all who knew her.

On February 2, 2021, NBC News reported no charges were being recommended for “the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot the Trump supporter.”
 
Top