WAR North Korean crisis 'worst I’ve seen,' top Navy officer warns

Zahra

Veteran Member
North Korean crisis 'worst I’ve seen,' top Navy officer warns

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/27/north-korean-crisis-worst-ve-seen-top-navy-officer-warns.html

By Brooke Singman, April 27, 2017

The senior U.S. Navy officer overseeing military operations in the Pacific region told lawmakers Thursday that the North Korean crisis is the worst he’s seen -- testifying that it's only a matter of time before Kim Jong Un has the capability of launching a nuclear warhead toward the United States.

“The crisis on the Korean peninsula is real—the worst I’ve seen,” said Commander of U.S. Pacific Command Adm. Harry B. Harris Jr. “There is some doubt within the intelligence community whether Kim Jong Un has that capability today or whether he will soon, but I have to assume he has it, the capability is real, and that he’s moving towards it.”

Harris spoke to the Senate Armed Services Committee a day after all 100 U.S. senators were invited to White House grounds for a North Korea briefing.

Harris declined to compare the current situation to that of the Cuban Missile Crisis decades ago, but said he has “no doubt” the country intends to develop nuclear missiles that could be aimed toward South Korea and the U.S.

Harris said he believes "America's future is linked" to the Pacific, even noting a possible migration of Islamic State militants back to the region as U.S. forces push to regain former ISIS territory in the Middle East.

But Harris said that North Korea remains "the most immediate threat" to U.S. security, as they "vigorously" pursue strikes and launches intended to target Australia, South Korea, and the U.S.

"Kim Jong Un is making progress and all nations need to take this seriously because their missiles point in all directions," Harris said. "If left unchecked, they will match the capability of his hostile rhetoric."

Harris underscored the importance of what he referred to as a “shift” in Kim Jong Un’s rhetoric, after threatening nations like Australia and the U.S. by name this week.

“His rhetoric is going in one direction and his capabilities are approaching the lines of his rhetoric,” Harris said. “Where those lines cross, I believe we are at an inflection point and we wake up to a new world.”

Despite the gravity of the threat North Korea continues to pose, Harris voiced confidence in U.S. defense plans, and said President Trump and Defense Secretary Mattis have made it clear that "all options are on the table."

"We want to bring Kim Jong Un to his senses -- not to his knees," Harris said. "I have the forces in place to fight tonight if necessary.”

Harris pushed, throughout the hearing, the need to repeal the sequester and for Congress to pass a budget that would provide the Department of Defense with more resources, saying that additional materials are needed “in the long-run.”

Harris told the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday that the U.S.–delivered THAAD anti-ballistic missile system being installed in South Korea would be operational in “a couple of days.”

“THAAD allows us intercept capability to shoot down, at the high altitude level, ballistic missiles that go from North Korea to South Korea,” Harris explained. “THAAD is a system that would give an umbrella to protect South Korea.”

Harris said that China is as responsible for where North Korea is today, but seemed to applaud Trump for his efforts to win cooperation from Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“We’re seeing more activity—positive activity—from China in this case than we’ve seen in a long time,” Harris said. He said he remains “cautiously optimistic, but hopeful” and said it was too early to tell.

Brooke Singman is a Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter at @brookefoxnews.
 
Not mentioned/answered:

  • Does NORK have the manufacturing capability to build more than a handful of nuclear warheaded missiles capable of reaching CONUS?

  • Does NORK have the TARGETING ability to reliably hit CONUS - world-class guidance/GPS/intel satellites and necessary supporting infrastructure and trained personnel to design, implement, build, deploy and maintain?

  • Does NORK have the resources - money, tech expertise, high-tech manufacturing gear and facilities, properly processed fissile materials for nuclear warhead + personnel expertise needed to store, process, handle safely?

  • Should NORK successfully launch a nuclear warhead missile towards CONUS, how can NORK be assured that it will reach its target, before they instantly become a glassed-over parking lot, and ceasing to exist as an inhabitable landscape?

  • Psychologically speaking, WHY would NORK have the desire to instantly cease to exist as a nation, once they launched a nuclear attack against CONUS and/or CONUS allies or interests?

There are other, much less costly, quiet, methods of dealing with this situation, per what we are being told exists/is reality regarding NORK by the MSM - or, is this merely more fake news designed to garner ratings and profits on the backs of the gullible "We, The People" citizenry?

You decide.


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

Illini Warrior

Illini Warrior
Not mentioned/answered:

  • Does NORK have the manufacturing capability to build more than a handful of nuclear warheaded missiles capable of reaching CONUS?

  • Does NORK have the TARGETING ability to reliably hit CONUS - world-class guidance/GPS/intel satellites and necessary supporting infrastructure and trained personnel to design, implement, build, deploy and maintain?

  • Does NORK have the resources - money, tech expertise, high-tech manufacturing gear and facilities, properly processed fissile materials for nuclear warhead + personnel expertise needed to store, process, handle safely?

  • Should NORK successfully launch a nuclear warhead missile towards CONUS, how can NORK be assured that it will reach its target, before they instantly become a glassed-over parking lot, and ceasing to exist as a habitual landscape?

  • Psychologically speaking, WHY would NORK have the desire to instantly cease to exist as a nation, once they launched a nuclear attack against CONUS and/or CONUS allies or interests?

There are other, much less costly, quiet, methods of dealing with this situation, per what we are being told exists/is reality regarding NORK by the MSM - or, is this merely more fake news designed to garner ratings and profits on the backs of the gullible "We, The People" citizenry?

You decide.


intothegoodnight



the question is - is Little Fat Boy crazy enough to strap a nuke on a donkey cart and send it down one of his DMZ tunnels? ... the answer is yes and that's why he needs to be stopped .... one is toooo many
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
...Does NORK have the TARGETING ability to reliably hit CONUS - world-class guidance/GPS/intel satellites and necessary supporting infrastructure and trained personnel to design, implement, build, deploy and maintain?...

This item, at least, is irrelevant. You don't need GPS-based guidance, or even "world-class guidance", whatever that is, to hit something the size of a city with a rocket. We landed men on the moon with slide rules and appallingly primitive electronic (electric, really) computers. He's not planning on doing multiple-target MIRV strikes, or using tactical-strength warheads to take out specific strategic targets like silo farms or tracking stations. NorK missiles are going to be single-warhead, so they don't need meter-accuracy. If they hit within a kilometer of their intended target, the desired effect will be achieved.


ETA: Your next question, I think, has already been answered, in that NorK already seems to have multiple nuclear devices, and so they presumably have demonstrated the capability to make and store nuclear devices.

And the final question, why would they do such a thing, knowing they'd be subatomic vapor in short order? Maybe they really believe that they won't; that they are as powerful as they boast, and will dominate the US. The possibility that they might be wrong is literally inconceivable to them, because Dear Leader has declared that they are right. Human psychology makes people do dumb things sometimes.
 

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
I dunno. Might be I is old and such, but when CinCPAC stands up and sounds like the squeaky wheel, I sit up n listen.




Probably just cuz I is a child of the 50's-60's
 
the question is - is Little Fat Boy crazy enough to strap a nuke on a donkey cart and send it down one of his DMZ tunnels? ... the answer is yes and that's why he needs to be stopped .... one is toooo many

At worst, "one" is likely all of the opportunity he will get to use nuclear weapons. NORK will cease to exist, moments later - instant suicide move, guaranteed.


intothegoodnight
 

dstraito

TB Fanatic
I am still unsure of the motivations from either side.

Maybe intell knows something that they haven't released.

It probably isn't about oil.

As far as NK motivation, aside from possibl madness, I don't see their motivation. I meant they might get a blow in before they cease to exist, why would anyone do that? Again, aside from insanity.
 
This item, at least, is irrelevant. You don't need GPS-based guidance, or even "world-class guidance", whatever that is,

Military-owned and operated satellites and anti-jamming gear, or even a JSTARS equivalent.

. . . to hit something the size of a city with a rocket. We landed men on the moon with slide rules and appallingly primitive electronic (electric, really) computers. He's not planning on doing multiple-target MIRV strikes, or using tactical-strength warheads to take out specific strategic targets like silo farms or tracking stations. NorK missiles are going to be single-warhead, so they don't need meter-accuracy. If they hit within a kilometer of their intended target, the desired effect will be achieved.

Of course, neither of us personally know whether the NORK missiles are even capable to THIS standard - secondly, there is some very sophisticated anti-missile tech out there, as of late - the Russians certainly know more about this subject, as does Dahlgren and Monmouth.

ETA: Your next question, I think, has already been answered, in that NorK already seems to have multiple nuclear devices, and so they presumably have demonstrated the capability to make and store nuclear devices.

Perhaps, if the MSM is to be believed . . .

And the final question, why would they do such a thing, knowing they'd be subatomic vapor in short order? Maybe they really believe that they won't; that they are as powerful as they boast, and will dominate the US. The possibility that they might be wrong is literally inconceivable to them, because Dear Leader has declared that they are right. Human psychology makes people do dumb things sometimes.

Cannot disagree with this point - it is the only OTHER answer - though, difficult to give any credence to, when ones stops to consider how the NORKs has been carefully crafted and cultivated over the decades, to become a convenient whipping boy and supreme western antagonist extraordinaire/ankle-biter - as required and on queue, by its handlers.

Nothing like a bit of alleged nuclear mischief in NORK-land to stir the western loins with soothing pro-war passions, don't you know . . .


intothegoodnight
 
Last edited:

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
I am still unsure of the motivations from either side.

Maybe intell knows something that they haven't released.

It probably isn't about oil.

As far as NK motivation, aside from possibl madness, I don't see their motivation. I meant they might get a blow in before they cease to exist, why would anyone do that? Again, aside from insanity.

Willing to bet that NK has stepped out of what was to be their role in The Great Game and needs to be adjusted.....
 

Shacknasty Shagrat

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I am still unsure of the motivations from either side.

Maybe intell knows something that they haven't released.

It probably isn't about oil.

As far as NK motivation, aside from possibl madness, I don't see their motivation. I meant they might get a blow in before they cease to exist, why would anyone do that? Again, aside from insanity.

Here is another take on the situation.
I think the sourcing of this article is weak. ie. The US attacks and the masses and elites rise up in opposition to Mr. Kim and the US immediately and painlessly wins, all that is a forecast without facts.
SS

'North Korea elites see 'ineffective leader' in Kim Jong Un
By Elizabeth Shim | April 27, 2017 at 11:24 AM



April 27 (UPI) -- North Korea's elite increasingly regard Kim Jong Un's leadership as "ineffective," even as Kim is trying to appease his constituency by moving them to a new high-end residential area in Pyongyang.

U.S. think tank Rand Corp. issued a report Thursday that found Kim Jong Un and the system of dynastic rule are unpopular among Pyongyang's well-heeled class.

The death of Kim would not lead to a family succession, if elites were given the choice, said senior defense analyst Bruce Bennett, according to CNBC.

"North Korea's elites have heavily gone into being entrepreneurs," Bennett said. "Kim Jong Un appears increasingly to the elites as ineffective and not a particularly good leader, which is likely how he's viewed now."

The analyst said the findings are being drawn from his interviews and research into defectors.

"Other than North Korea's weapons and [the] ballistic missiles of this regime, Kim Jong Un doesn't really have a lot to make him feel empowered," Bennett said.

The analyst also said South Korea should provide incentives to elites, numbering in the hundreds of thousands, to prepare for eventual unification.

Seoul should particularly focus on North Korea elites' safety, wealth and social status.

Kim has for years been able to keep elites in line with rewards for fulfilling his objectives, including bringing in foreign currency earnings.

On Thursday, Pyongyang's state-controlled KCNA reported officials from the Korean Workers' Party visited North Korean families at their new high-rise residences on Ryomyong Street.

The new construction was celebrated at a ceremony where Kim was in attendance on April 13.

"Those responsible listened to the thoughts and concerns of the new residents and told stories of the devotion and hard work of Kim Jong Un, the best most respected leader," KCNA stated.

North Korea said "ordinary teachers" as well as scientists had been moved to their state-provided apartments.

"The new residents were so grateful they shed tears of passion," according to KCNA.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...n-Kim-Jong-Un/9051493306086/?spt=su&or=btn_tw
 
I am still unsure of the motivations from either side.

Maybe intell knows something that they haven't released.

It probably isn't about oil.

As far as NK motivation, aside from possibl madness, I don't see their motivation. I meant they might get a blow in before they cease to exist, why would anyone do that? Again, aside from insanity.

Well, it certainly directs the western world's attention away from:

  • Syria

  • ObamaCare debate

  • Brexit

  • Marine Le Pen and any talk of Frexit

  • pending western economic train wreck

  • PedoGate

  • the Clintons and Bill's alleged rapidly failing health (or not)

  • The Wall

  • still ongoing illegal immigration/invasion of western nations by Muslim hordes

. . . and probably a few others that don't come to mind, at the moment.


intothegoodnight
 

DHR43

Since 2001
"...testifying that it's only a matter of time before Kim Jong Un has the capability of launching a nuclear warhead toward the United States."

Snooze-fest. If he does (and I really, REALLY doubt he has the capability to do so, let alone the stupidity to decide that way), then fire up the THAAD units already in Hawaii, Guam, Wake Islands, SK, perhaps other places. Aircraft-based lasers, other high technology systems few know about. LOTS of defense capabilities/

A LOT of money has been 'invested' in missile defence; we're in good hands, right?
 
Top