WAR North Korea Main Thread - All things Korea May 5th - May 11th

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
North Korea Main Thread - All things Korea April 27th - May 4th
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...in-Thread-All-things-Korea-April-27th-May-4th

Damn! Somebody finally figured Nor. Korea out.
Started by Troke‎, 05-03-2017 05:03 AM
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?516373-Damn!-Somebody-finally-figured-Nor.-Korea-out.

----------

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/...ues-nuclear-test-efforts-170505042945013.html

NEWSNORTH KOREA2 HOURS AGO

IAEA chief: North Korea continues nuclear test efforts

UN atomic agency chief Yukiya Amano says satellite images suggest nuclear efforts moving ahead as stated by Pyongyang.

The United Nations atomic agency has expressed concern about the nuclear programme of North Korea, saying satellite imagery suggests that the country is moving ahead with its nuclear efforts.

In an interview published on Thursday, Yukiya Amano, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung that the agency has "concrete information that the unclear programme is going ahead just as North Korea is publicly stating".

The IAEA is basing its conclusions on satellite surveillance of the communist country, as its inspectors were evicted from North Korea in 2009.

Inspectors have since continued to collect and evaluate information from satellite imagery, open-source and trade-related information.

"All available clues show that North Korea is making progress, and that worries us," Amano added, pointing out that the security risks would apply beyond the region.

On Thursday, US-based analysts also said that satellite images provided to them indicated that activity had resumed at North Korea's nuclear test site.

READ MORE: Interview with a North Korean defector

"It is unclear if this activity indicates that a nuclear test has been cancelled, or that the facility is in stand-by mode, or that a test is imminent," researchers from the monitoring group at John Hopkins University's US-Korea Institute said.

Pyongyang says it has conducted five nuclear weapons tests since 2006. Two of them are supposed to have taken place last year. Furthermore, the country is repeatedly breaching UN resolutions and testing various missiles.

On Monday its foreign ministry warned that the country was prepared to carry out a nuclear test "at any time and at any location" set by its leadership.

US President Donald Trump has been trying to increase pressure on North Korea and is counting on China's support to do so.

Trump said that all options were on the table in the case of Pyongyang, but lately toned down his statements mentioning he would even be inclined to meet North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-un, under certain conditions.

Amid tensions and belligerent rhetoric from North Korea, the US test-fired an unarmed ballistic missile from an airbase in California.

The Minuteman 3 is an intercontinental missile capable of transporting nuclear warheads. The US air force has about 450 such weapons, part of its nuclear arsenal.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.ft.com/content/333e0f44-3158-11e7-9555-23ef563ecf9a

North Korea vents at China over sanctions threat

State news agency decries Beijing’s ‘insincerity and betrayal’ in sign of divergence

AN HOUR AGO by: Lucy Hornby in Beijing

North Korea has vented its frustrations with China as tensions on the Korean peninsula subside, highlighting the diverging interests of the countries even as Washington tries to use Beijing to control Pyongyang.

After tough talk in early April of harsher sanctions as it tried to avert a showdown between the US and North Korea over its nuclear tests, China has dialled down its public pressure on Pyongyang in recent days. Air China flights to Pyongyang resumed on Friday after a three-week suspension during the height of a face-off over North Korea’s missile tests.*

Nonetheless, North Korean news agency KCNA this week fired off a long complaint about “a string of absurd and reckless remarks” by Chinese newspapers, which Beijing has used over the past month to threaten Pyongyang if it continued with its missile provocations.*

The Korean agency took umbrage at the Chinese view, expressed in nationalist tabloid the Global Times, that its tests posed a risk to China’s northeastern provinces. “It is just the DPRK whose strategic interests have been repeatedly violated due to insincerity and betrayal on the part of its partner,” it said, using the abbreviation of its official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

The war of words comes as Chinese public opinion, particularly in elite business and political circles, shifts towards seeing North Korea as a liability, particularly if its tests provoke unwelcome American interference in north-east Asia.

The Chinese military remains more sympathetic to its impoverished neighbour, which strategists see as an essential buffer state as long as US military forces are stationed in Japan and South Korea.*

Calls by Chinese newspapers for stricter sanctions and their support for a refusal to rule out military intervention if the DPRK failed to abandon its nuclear programme are “no more than an extremely ego-driven theory based on big-power chauvinism that not only the strategic interests but also the dignity and vital rights of the DPRK should be sacrificed for the interests of China”, KCNA said.

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang countered that “for years, the Chinese side has been assessing and dealing with the relevant issue based on its own merits in an objective and impartial manner”.

The Washington policy establishment has hailed China’s co-operation in trying to dissuade North Korea from testing missiles that could threaten allies in north-east Asia. China for its part welcomed US President Donald Trump’s comment this week that he “would be honoured” to meet Kim Jong Un, North Korea’s supreme leader.

“Currently, we’ve seen more co-operation between China and US to put pressure on North Korea,” said Zhao Tong,*a nuclear policy expert at the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in Beijing. “But drama between the two countries’ state media does not mean changes of policies on the government level.”

Many Chinese argue that the country’s economic and political interests now align more naturally with South Korea than with the North, but the installation of a US anti-missile system has caused relations between Beijing and Seoul to turn acrimonious in recent months.*

South Korean officials are quietly hoping the country’s presidential election this month will provide an opportunity to reset relations with China, opening the door to a visit to China by the new president later this year.

Additional reporting by Archie Zhang in Beijing

Follow Lucy Hornby on Twitter: @HornbyLucy
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.dw.com/en/us-house-of-re...o-impose-new-north-korea-sanctions/a-38706619

Date 05.05.2017

US House of Representatives votes to impose new North Korea sanctions

The Republican-led House has voted overwhelmingly to impose fresh sanctions on North Korea. The vote has come as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson urged South East Asian allies to further isolate Pyongyang.

US lawmakers on Thursday voted almost unanimously in favor of imposing fresh sanctions on the North Korean regime as tensions continue to mount over its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

The new legislation takes aim at Pyongyang's shipping industry and use of slave labor. Under the new bill, ships owned by North Korea or countries refusing comply with UN resolutions against it will be barred from sailing in US waters or docking at US ports.

Goods produced by the forced labor exported by the North will also be prohibited from entering the US. The bill also makes clear that anyone found using slave labor from North Korea would be subject to sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

According to Republican Ed Royce of California, a co-sponsor of the bill, countries including Senegal, Angola and Qatar import North Korean workers who send their salary back home, helping the pariah regime take in billions of dollars each year.
"This is money that (North Korean leader) Kim Jong-un uses to advance his nuclear and missile program, and also pay his generals, buying their loyalty to his brutal regime," Royce said. "That is what the high-level defectors that I meet with say. So let's squeeze his purse."

The bill also requires the administration of US President Donald Trump to decide whether to designate North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism within the coming 90 days. Doing so would trigger further sanctions, including restriction on US foreign assistance, which is usually designated towards disaster relief.
The latest measures will now go to Senate to be ratified.

US pushes ASEAN states over Pyongyang relations
Thursday's vote in the House of Representatives conincded with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson calling on Southeast Asian governments to do more to ensure a "leak-proof" enforcement of sanctions against Kim Jong Un's regime.

Read more: Trump discusses North Korea options with Asian leaders

Briefing reporters on the back of Tillerson's first meeting with all members of the 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Patrick Murphy, US deputy assistant secretary of state to east Asia, said: "We are communicating with all countries to implement the U.N. Security Council resolutions and, most importantly, deny North Korea the revenue streams it has used to advance its provocative programs."

Video

Washington is also pushing ASEAN nations to prevent diplomats from the North from conducting business aimed at financing its weapons programs.

All ASEAN states have diplomatic relations with North Korea, while five even have embassies in Pyongyang.

According to Murphy, Washington was not seeking to encourage the ASEAN states to cut all diplomatic ties, but rather to examine were relations with North Korea "clearly exceed diplomatic needs."

Read more: Opinion: US, North Korea, China - diplomacy and saber rattling

Tillerson also reportedly sought to ease any fears among Asian leaders that Washington could wave its security and economic commitments to the region on the back of Trump's "America First" platform and the US' withdrawal from the Trans Pacific Partnership trade pact.

Murphy said Tillerson had stressed that the ASEAN region remained a "very important ... strategic partner" for the US. Trump, Murphy said, had demonstrated that commitment by agreeing to attend regional summits in the Philippines and Vietnam later this year.

dm/bw (AP, Reuters, AFP)

Video

DW RECOMMENDS

US to tighten sanctions on North Korea
The US aims to pressure North Korea into ending its nuclear and ballistic missile programs with tightened sanctions and diplomacy. Top officials hope to end the standoff peacefully, but have also raised military options. (27.04.2017)

Sent from North Korea, exploited in Poland
Hundreds of North Korean workers are believed to be toiling in Poland under degrading conditions. An MEP calls on the European Commission to act, but the EC says it's a national matter. Others remain silent. (17.06.2016)

North Korea escalation, South China Sea dominate ASEAN meeting in Manila
Leaders of the Southeast Asian nations have gathered in Manila as tensions on the Korean Peninsula are high on the agenda of the ASEAN summit. Manila aims to soften the bloc's stance on Beijing's South China Sea claims. (29.04.2017)

ASEAN 50 years on: Success or failure?
50 years ago, ASEAN emerged as a beacon of unity in Southeast Asia. Today the group is beset by security challenges stemming from the new US administration, a lack of economic integration and a poor human rights record. (29.04.2017)

Guns, gold and gas: What UN sanctions target North Korea?
International observers say North Korea continues to flout bans on its pursuit of a nuclear weapons program. The UN Security Council has increased sanctions on the country. (19.04.2017)

AUDIOS AND VIDEOS ON THE TOPIC

In Seoul, divisions over North Korea threat
N. Korea accuses US of pushing peninsula to brink of nuclear war – Correspondent Jason Strother
Date 05.05.2017
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
:siren::siren::siren::siren::siren:

Mind Your Own Business,
Stay Away From Russian Ports - Moscow on US Bill


15:25 05.05.2017(updated 16:25 05.05.2017)
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201705051053310530-russia-us-ports-north-korea/


The United States should leave port management in the Russian
Far East to Moscow and focus on its own affairs, Deputy Prime Minister
and Presidential Plenipotentiary Envoy to the Far Eastern Federal
District Yury Trutnev said Friday.

GORKI (Russia), (Sputnik) — His comments follow the reported passage
on Thursday of a US House of Representatives bill enhancing sanctions
against North Korea, outlining "inspection authorities" over Chinese,
Iranian, Syrian and Russian ports.

The latter include the ports of Nakhodka, Vanino and Vladivostok.

"The United States of America should deal with the affairs
of the United States of America. As for our ports, we have
quite enough government agencies and supervisory bodies
that are able to control the fulfillment of all international
obligations that Russia has assumed," Trutnev told reporters.


The chairman of the Russian upper house
of parliament's international committee said
the bill amounted to a declaration of war.


The situation on the Korean peninsula aggravated in recent months as
North Korea carried out a number of missile launches and nuclear tests ,
which are considered to be in violation of the UN Security Council resolutions.

The most recent missile test allegedly took place on April 29 from a site
north of Pyongyang. Japan, South Korea and the United States said the
test appeared to have failed as the missile broke-up within North Korean
territory.

1052636533.jpg

© AP Photo/ Wong Maye-E
US, S Korean Intel Try to Assassinate Kim Jong-un With Biochemical Weapon - Pyongyang


On May 3, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the United States is
preparing to impose additional sanctions on North Korea if Pyongyang
continues to pursue ballistic and nuclear weapons. As a response to
the potential use of nuclear weapons, the United States sent a strike group
led by US aircraft carrier Carl Vinson to the Korean Peninsula in early April,
where it began exercises with the South Korean navy.

US media reported on mid-April that US President Donald Trump might
order a strike against North Korea in light of its military activities.
The North Korean top officials said the country was ready for nuclear
attacks in case of possible US military aggression.

The crisis is aggravated by the deployment of the US THAAD air defense
system in South Korea.

The THAAD agreement was reached by Seoul and Washington in July 2016.
The move came amid growing tensions spurred by North Korea's recurring
ballistic and nuclear missile tests. The THAAD system has a range of some
200 kilometers (125 miles) and is designed to intercept short, medium and
intermediate ballistic missiles at the terminal incoming stage.

The move to deploy it in South Korea has been criticized by neighboring China
and Russia as inappropriate
, possibly disproportionate, and affecting
other countries' interests.

____________

:siren::siren::siren:
US House Bill on Port Controls
Amounts to 'Declaration of War'
- Russian Senator



11:07 05.05.2017(updated 15:41 05.05.2017)
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201705051053301190-us-bill-russian-ports-war-declaration/

A US House of Representatives bill establishing control over the Russian
Far East ports envisions a show of force and thus amounts to a declaration of war,
the chairman of the Russian upper house of parliament's international committee
told Sputnik.

"This bill, I hope will never be implemented because its implementation envisions
a scenario of power with forced inspections of all vessels by US warships,"
Konstantin Kosachev said Friday.


His comments follow the reported passage on Thursday of a House bill enhancing
sanctions against North Korea, outlining "inspection authorities" over Chinese,
Iranian, Syrian and Russian ports. The latter include the ports of Nakhodka, Vanino
and Vladivostok.

"Such a power scenario is beyond comprehension, because it means a declaration
of war," Kosachev underscored.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
"causam belli' anyone?....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...-jong-un/ar-BBALnu8?li=AA4Zpp&ocid=spartandhp

N. Korea accuses CIA of plot to assassinate Kim Jong-Un

AFP
4 hrs ago
(Video provided by Reuters)

North Korea on Friday accused the CIA of plotting with South Korea to assassinate leader Kim Jong-Un, amid soaring tensions in the flashpoint region.

The CIA and Seoul's Intelligence Services have "hatched a vicious plot" involving unspecified "biochemical substances" to kill the hermit state's young leader during public ceremonial events in Pyongyang, the Ministry of State Security said.

For the CIA "assassination by use of biochemical substances including radioactive substance and nano poisonous substance is the best method that does not require access to the target, their lethal results will appear after six or twelve months," the Ministry said in a statement carried by state media.

The accusation comes as Pyongyang issues increasingly belligerent rhetoric in a tense stand off with the administration of US President Donald Trump over its rogue weapons programme.

The war of words between the West and the reclusive regime has spiked in recent weeks, and Pyongyang has threatened to carry out a sixth nuclear test that would further inflame tensions.

The CIA and Seoul's Intelligence Services (IS) have "ideologically corrupted and bribed a DPRK citizen surnamed Kim" to carry out the attack on Jong-Un, the statement said.

"We will ferret out and mercilessly destroy to the last one the terrorists of the US CIA and the puppet IS of South Korea," the statement said, adding that the plot was tantamount to "the declaration of a war".

"The heinous crime, which was recently uncovered and smashed in the DPRK, is a kind of terrorism against not only the DPRK but the justice and conscience of humankind and an act of mangling the future of humankind."

The statement did not give any information on how the plot was foiled or what happened to the alleged spy.

North Korea maintains extensive surveillance operations over its own population, and open dissent against the regime is considered extremely difficult.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...nnection/ar-BBAKMce?li=AA4Zpp&ocid=spartandhp

Pentagon eyes Iran-North Korea military connection

FOX News
Lucas Tomlinson
7 hrs ago
Video

When Iran attempted to launch a cruise missile from a “midget” submarine earlier this week, Pentagon officials saw more evidence of North Korean influence in the Islamic Republic – with intelligence reports saying the submarine was based on a Pyongyang design, the same type that sank a South Korean warship in 2010.

According to U.S. defense officials, Iran was attempting to launch a Jask-2 cruise missile underwater for the first time, but the launch failed. Nonproliferation experts have long suspected North Korea and Iran are sharing expertise when it comes to their rogue missile programs.

“The very first missiles we saw in Iran were simply copies of North Korean missiles,” said Jeffrey Lewis, a missile proliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. “Over the years, we've seen photographs of North Korean and Iranian officials in each other's countries, and we've seen all kinds of common hardware.” *

When Iran tested a ballistic missile in late January, the Pentagon said it was based on a North Korean design. Last summer, Iran conducted another missile launch similar to a North Korean Musudan, the most advanced missile Pyongyang has successful tested to date.

Defense analysts say North Korea's Taepodong missile looks almost identical to Iran's Shahab.

“In the past, we would see things in North Korea and they would show up in Iran. In some recent years, we've seen some small things appear in Iran first and then show up in North Korea and so that raises the question of whether trade -- which started off as North Korea to Iran -- has started to reverse,” Lewis added. *

Iran’s attempted cruise missile launch from the midget submarine in the Strait of Hormuz was believed to be one of the first times Iran has attempted such a feat. In 2015, North Korea successfully launched a missile from a submarine for the first time, and officials believe Tehran is not far behind.*

Only two countries in the world deploy the Yono-class submarine - North Korea and Iran. Midget subs operate in shallow waters where they can hide. The North Korean midget sub that sank a 290-foot South Korean warship in 2010 -- killing over 40 sailors -- was ambushed in shallow water.

North Korea denied any involvement in the sinking. *

“When those midget subs are operating underwater, they are running on battery power—making themselves very quiet and hard to detect,” said a U.S. defense official who declined to be identified. *

During testimony last week, Adm. Harry Harris, the head of American forces in the Pacific, warned the United States has no land-based short- or medium-range missiles because it is a signatory to the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces, or INF, treaty signed in 1987 between Russia and the United States. But Iran and North Korea are under no such constraints.*

"We are being taken to the cleaners by countries that are not signatories to the INF,” Harris told the House Armed Services Committee late last month.*

Perhaps most worrisome for the United States is that Iran attempted this latest missile launch from a midget sub Tuesday in the narrow and crowded Strait of Hormuz, where much of the world's oil passes each day.

Over a year ago, Iran *fired off a number of unguided rockets near the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier as she passed through the Strait of Hormuz in late December 2015. The U.S. Navy called the incident “highly provocative” at the time and said the American aircraft carrier was only 1,500 yards away from the Iranian rockets.

In July 2016, two days before the anniversary of the nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers, the Islamic Republic attempted to launch a new type of ballistic missile using North Korean technology, according to multiple intelligence officials.

It was the first time Iran attempted to launch a version of North Korea’s BM-25 Musudan ballistic missile, which has a maximum range of nearly 2,500 miles, potentially putting U.S. forces in the Middle East and Israel within reach if the problems are fixed.

The extent of North Korea’s involvement in the failed launch was never clear, apart from North Korea sharing their technology, according to officials.*

In Washington Thursday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson tried to garner support for more United Nations sanctions against North Korea by hosting leaders from Southeast Asia. Days after Iran’s first ballistic missile test of the Trump administration, the White House put Iran “on notice.”*
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
US 'Russian Port Control' Bill
Smells Like a Bluff, Publicity Stunt



18:00 05.05.2017
https://sputniknews.com/politics/201705051053319018-port-inspection-bill-reaction/

As the US government ponders whether to attempt to establish control over
several of Russia’s Far Eastern ports, it remains unclear how such a feat
could be accomplished without causing severe consequences.


1053303002.jpg

© Sputnik/ Vitaliy Ankov
US Bill Establishing Control of Russia's Ports Amounts to Declaration of War - Russian Senator

On Thursday the US House of Representatives passed a bill on further
sanctions against North Korea, which provides for the possibility of
establishing control over a number of Russian, Iranian, Syrian and Chinese
ports in order to ensure that no forbidden cargo reaches Pyongyang.

This initiative has predictably puzzled Russian lawmakers and businessmen
alike because it remains unclear exactly how the US might enact this
measure without committing a gross violation of Russia’s sovereignty.

Vladimir Baranov, head of a company which is expected to launch a ferry
line between Vladivostok and the North Korean port of Rajin, said that
this US move looks like a bluff.

"The US physically cannot control Russian ports – you have to visit the port
authority, demand documents, that sort of thing… This is essentially a bluff
by the US, an attempt to show that it controls the world.
Meanwhile, we’ll be transporting whatever it is we need to transport,"
Baranov said.


Alexander Latkin, a professor at the Vladivostok State University of
Economics and Service, echoed his concerns, adding that any attempt
by the US to control Russian ports looks absurd.

"How could the US control our ports’ operations? It might’ve been possible
if the US possessed a percentage of the ports’ equity, but as far as I know
all of the shareholders are Russian. It is essentially a political move by the
US. The Americans don’t have any legal or economic basis for controlling
our ports," he explained.

Meanwhile, Maxim Grigoriev, head of the Foundation for the Study of
Democracy, told Sputnik Radio that while the US House of Representative
adopted the bill virtually anonymously, this entire situation has a touch
of tragicomedy to it.

"A declaration about keeping an eye on what’s going on in Russian ports
sounds rather funny. However, what happened is that the US judicial
authority has empowered its executive counterpart to present a report
on this matter, which includes telling whether the sanctions against North
Korea are being violated via Russian, Iranian and Syrian ports.

I’d like to point out that the bill did not outline any inspection procedure
as it would’ve been completely pointless, but the wording itself does look
rather ambiguous. The US doesn’t mind that it basically dictates that
other countries must adhere to US legislation," he said.

Furthermore, according to Grigoriev, this bill was likely adopted
to pave the way for another move against Russia.

"Clearly this is a preparation for some sort of statement to be made
against Russia, Syria or China. This measure is unlikely to be related
to real politics, because the US doesn’t have any jurisdiction over
other countries.
But this is an obvious foundation for some propaganda
campaign," Grigoriev surmised.

In September 2013, Russia re-opened a 54 kilometer railway link that
connects Russia with the North Korean port of Rajin. Russia has expressed
its desire to team up with North and South Korea to launch a railroad
project that would help establish a rapport between the two estranged
neighbors.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/05/05/the_downside_of_north_korea_111319.html

The Downside of North Korea

By Charles V. Peña
May 05, 2017

As a real estate mogul, one of Donald Trump’s key principles was: “protect the downside and the upside will take care of itself.” As president, this concept could serve Trump well, as his administration deals with North Korea.

Conventional wisdom is that the worst possible outcome, the downside, is a nuclear North Korea capable of striking America. North Korea is already considered a nuclear power and is believed to have 10 or more nuclear weapons. But what it does not have yet is long-range strike capability to attack the United States. Indeed, according to Admiral Harry Harris, the head of U.S. Pacific Command, North Korea’s “strategic capabilities are not yet an existential threat to the U.S.”

Nonetheless, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and Director of Intelligence Dan Coats have deemed North Korea as “an urgent national security threat.”

Why?

Because they believe the regime would launch an unprovoked nuclear strike and kill hundreds of thousands of Americans. So this is the downside the administration is trying to protect against.* But how likely is that downside?

North Korea is often portrayed as an “aggressive” regime. It is certainly a country that acts in defiance of international norms, but it has not actually used military force against any other country since the end of the Korean War more than 60 years ago.

Kim Jong-un has issued swaggering threats and has the ability to unleash tremendous conventional military force, and maybe even nukes, against South Korea—but it hasn’t.

So why do we automatically assume North Korea would nuke America? Doing so would guarantee his utter destruction since the much larger U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has the capability to respond with overwhelming and devastating force.

But isn’t Kim Jong-un irrational—even crazy? The same was said of both Stalin and Mao in their times. Yet both were deterred.

You would have to believe that Kim Jong-un is suicidal to believe he would attack America (or anyone) with nuclear weapons. The evidence is just the opposite. Like his father and his grandfather, he is more interested in surviving and perpetuating the Kim dynasty. *So if North Korean nukes are more about survival and not about incinerating American cities, is there a different possible downside that we should be worried about and protect against?

Although the president has raised the specter of a “a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with North Korea,” a major conflict would be a major downside.

Analysts on all sides believe a full-scale conventional war would be devastating. In 1994, when President Bill Clinton contemplated the use of force against North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, Gary Luck—the then commander of U.S. Forces Korea—thought a conventional war with North Korea would likely result in 1 million dead and nearly $1 trillion of economic damage.

Worse yet, if the U.S. waged a pre-emptive war against North Korea, Kim Jong-un might feel he would have nothing to lose by using one of his nuclear weapons that we believe he already has.

The aftermath of a war must also be taken into account. We would face a massive nation-building effort that Koreans and the world would expect us to bear.

How do we protect against this downside?

First, we must acknowledge that North Korea’s quest for nuclear weapons has more to do with survival than attacking America out of the blue—and that we can deter the latter. We need to understand that military threats are unlikely to change Kim Jong-un’s mind. It is much more likely to reinforce his belief he needs nuclear strike capability to ensure his regime’s survival.

Second, we must understand that the more we threaten the use of force, the more likely the possibility of a miscalculation that leads to war. So sending a carrier strike group led by the USS Carl Vinson into waters off North Korea could do more harm than good. Indeed, Pyongyang’s reaction was to announce that it was ready for war. Also, continually threatening to use military force—and using an all sticks and no carrots approach—pushes Kim Jong-un into a corner and puts him in a “nothing to lose” situation if he feels he’s going to be attacked.

Third, we need to realize that even so-called limited strikes against North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs are not likely to be viewed as limited by Pyongyang—especially if tens or hundreds of targets are involved and there is collateral damage with civilian casualties. That Kim Jong-un would sit idly by after being attacked is fantasy. More likely, such strikes would generate a response that could easily escalate to a wider, larger, and more costly war.

Ultimately, it means understanding that the costs and risks of military action against North Korea outweigh the perceived benefits. In other words, cooler heads and realism need to prevail, which means reasoned analysis of possible policies and their second and third order consequences. Otherwise, we will continue to pursue dangerous policies that cost more in lives and dollars than predicted, drain our military, and weaken our security. Let's hope President Trump resists the repeatedly wrong advice from the status quo, left-right policy elite consensus in Washington.
*
Charles V. Peña is a senior fellow with Defense Priorities. He has more than 25 years of experience as a policy and program analyst and senior manager, supporting both the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security. Peña is the former director of defense-policy studies at the Cato Institute and author of Winning the Un-War: A New Strategy for the War on Terrorism.
 

Be Well

may all be well
GORKI (Russia), (Sputnik) — His comments follow the reported passage
on Thursday of a US House of Representatives bill enhancing sanctions
against North Korea, outlining "inspection authorities" over Chinese,
Iranian, Syrian and Russian ports.

That bolded parts es[ecially seems like a rotten idea. It says "reported" passage, I hope someone digs it up to find it if accurate.
 

Be Well

may all be well
The Downside of North Korea

By Charles V. Peña
May 05, 2017


Charles V. Peña is a senior fellow with Defense Priorities. He has more than 25 years of experience as a policy and program analyst and senior manager, supporting both the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security. Peña is the former director of defense-policy studies at the Cato Institute and author of Winning the Un-War: A New Strategy for the War on Terrorism.

I'm always curious to see what opinions and positions authors have, it sheds a lot of light on what they say in any articles. I know the Cato Institute is strongly libertarian, so I seached his article or book or whatever it is, "Winning the Un-War, A New Strategy for the War on Terrorism". There are downloads of it, below link has a PDF and abstract, the abstract was enough to tell me that he thinks US aggression and behavior has caused radicalization of jihadis, he does not mention the inherent jihad in Islamic ideology, texts, or their entire 1400 year history. So I suggest taking his viewpoint, or may I say, blindness of real Islamic jihad, into account when he discusses the Nork situation.

http://jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/view/191

Winning the UN War: Strategy for the War on Terrorism
Charles V. Peña

Abstract

The war on terrorism is a different kind of war that requires a different strategic approach. The enemy is not a generic evil or even terrorism itself, but the al Qaeda terrorist network and the radical Islamist ideology it is fueling. A winning strategy would consist of three central elements, in ascending order of importance: homeland security against future terrorist attacks, dismantling and degrading the al Qaeda terrorist network, and a foreign policy that does not needlessly create new terrorists. Ultimately, changing U.S. foreign policy to stem the tide of growing anti-American sentiment overseas is the most important element because we cannot build a perfect defense against every potential terrorist attack and we cannot kill each and every al Qaeda terrorist. Although changing U.S. foreign policy may not guarantee victory in the war on terrorism, not changing it will spell certain defeat.
 

Sacajawea

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Perhaps the idiots in Congress meant that the Pentagon would their uber-top secret x-ray vision to inspect those ports?
 

Blue 5

Veteran Member
North Korea is often portrayed as an “aggressive” regime. It is certainly a country that acts in defiance of international norms, but it has not actually used military force against any other country since the end of the Korean War more than 60 years ago.

The 40 South Korean sailors aboard the sunken destroyer and several soldiers who were killed in mortar shelling during North Korean attacks a few years ago would beg to differ, except that they're dead.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The 40 South Korean sailors aboard the sunken destroyer and several soldiers who were killed in mortar shelling during North Korean attacks a few years ago would beg to differ, except that they're dead.

Yeah...there's a reason I put a "Hummm....." above that article...
 

Blue 5

Veteran Member
Yeah...there's a reason I put a "Hummm....." above that article...

No worries. I understood your meaning. I was just pointing out the mistake of the original author. Most journalists, and indeed many other people, are completely ignorant of history and have the memory capacity of goldfish :)
 

almost ready

Inactive
Big buzz about the Chinese mutual defense treaty with NK, which has a get-out clause if NK develops nuclear weapons. This has hit a major Chinese diplomatic publication, and also some NK response.

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...ot-obliged-defend-n-korea-if-its-attacked-say


China’s nuclear get-out clause over defence of North Korea


Beijing not obliged to defend Pyongyang as its development of nuclear weapons breaches mutual defence pact, experts say as US warns it may launch strike against North

The assessment comes as senior officials in Washington warn of a strike against the Pyongyang regime.

China and North Korea signed a mutual aid and cooperation treaty in 1961 as they sought to mount a united front against Western powers. It specifies that if one of the parties comes under armed attack, the other should render immediate assistance, including military support.

The 10 minutes with Xi Jinping that changed Donald Trump’s mind on North Korea

But the treaty also says both nations should safeguard peace and security.

For China, North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons in violation of the United Nations treaty on non-proliferation could amount to a breach of their pact, leaving Beijing with no obligation to lend a hand, observers said.

****

Some readers here may know about this, but this is apparently the source of NK's anger and crying about "betrayal" by China. I hadn't seen this until today, so if you've all discussed it before, will just beg your pardon now.

More

Ankit Panda‏Verified account @nktpnd Apr 13

Ankit Panda Retweeted Bill Bishop

Some Chinese analysts argue that North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons and withdrawal from the NPT violates their 1961 treaty

https://twitter.com/nktpnd/status/852486322182909952

****

In truth, I've been wondering why NK is so angry at Beijing. ah ha!
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The 40 South Korean sailors aboard the sunken destroyer and several soldiers who were killed in mortar shelling during North Korean attacks a few years ago would beg to differ, except that they're dead.

IIRC, there were some Civilian deaths in that mortar/artillery attack, weren't there?
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
"causam belli' anyone?....

Posted for fair use.....
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...-jong-un/ar-BBALnu8?li=AA4Zpp&ocid=spartandhp

N. Korea accuses CIA of plot to assassinate Kim Jong-Un
AFP
4 hrs ago

North Korea on Friday accused the CIA of plotting with South Korea to assassinate leader Kim Jong-Un, amid soaring tensions in the flashpoint region.

Indeed... (in response to bolded red text)

More on this from the BBC:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-39815561
(fair use applies)

North Korea claims CIA plotted to kill Kim Jong-un
5 May 2017

North Korea has accused US and South Korean agents of plotting to kill its Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un.

A North Korean referred to only as "Kim" was paid to carry out an attack with biochemical substances, the ministry of state security said.

The plot was foiled, it said, but gave no details on the fate of "Kim". The CIA declined to comment and South Korea has issued no statement so far.

The North's claim comes amid continued high tension on the Korean peninsula.

US President Donald Trump has promised to "solve" North Korea and stop it developing nuclear weapons.

A need for caution: Analysis by Michael Bristow, BBC News

The allegations made by North Korea are detailed. They gave names of people supposedly involved in the plot, dates on which key characters communicated with each other and the amounts of money that allegedly changed hands. But that is not proof that there is any truth to the accusations.

It is important to remember several things, not least that North Korea has provided no supporting evidence for its allegations. Past history also suggests caution. North Korea often uses colourful language and is no stranger to extravagant claims. Just this week it turned on its only real ally, China, accusing it of insincerity and betrayal.

With President Trump promising to stop North Korea developing nuclear weapons, these are also tense times, when Pyongyang could have been tempted to hit back at the US.

Until more is known, it's difficult to assess the validity of the claims.

'Human scum'

The ministry of state security statement, carried by state news agency KCNA, said the CIA and South Korean intelligence services had "hatched a vicious plot to hurt the supreme leadership of the DPRK".

It did not mention Kim Jong-un by name, but he is widely referred to as the supreme leader.

The ministry said a plot had been hatched to use "bomb terrorism" to target the supreme leadership at a military parade or at an event at the Kumsusan Palace of the Sun, the mausoleum of Kim Il-sung, the country's founding leader.

It said "Kim" had been told that the best method was the use of "biochemical substances including radioactive substance and nano poisonous substance" whose results would "appear after six or 12 months".

Killing Kim? How the 'plot' unfolded

June 2014: A North Korean working at a timber firm in the Khabarovsk territory of far-eastern Russia is "corrupted and bribed" by CIA and South Korean intelligence agents. The man - "Kim" - is given cash and a "satellite transmitter-receiver" and returns to Pyongyang

January, May, August, September 2016: "Kim" is in satellite contact with South Korean agents on handling biochemical agents and on the possible sites of an assassination attempt

March and April 2017: "Kim" meets a South Korean agent in the city of Dandong in China and is given a new transmitter and more cash. Further communications take place in April. The last date that appears in the North Korean statement is "early May", when "Kim" is supposed to receive "necessary equipment" via a "liaison centre" he has set up with his funding. No details are given on "Kim's" apprehension or fate.

Source: Ministry of state security statement via KCNA

"Only the CIA can produce such substance", it said, adding that South Korea had borne the funding.

The ministry alleged that the North Korean man had been "turned" by the CIA and the South Korean intelligence service while working in Russia in 2014.

The ministry refers to two payments to "Kim" of $20,000 (£15,500) and a further two of $100,000 for "bribery" and obtaining equipment. It refers to another of $50,000 but it is unclear if this is additional.

On his return to Pyongyang, it says, he was instructed to provide detailed information about a frequently used event ground and to assess possible methods of attack.

Analysts say such an assassination operation would be extremely difficult to plan and carry out given the massive security around the supreme leader.

The ministry statement gave no details of how the alleged plan had been uncovered or about the fate of "Kim", whom it described as "human scum".

The ministry said the "intelligence and plot-breeding organisations of the US imperialists and the puppet clique", referring to the South, would be swept away.

Earlier this year, Kim Jong-un's half brother, Kim Jong-nam, was killed with the banned nerve agent VX at Kuala Lumpur international airport. South Korea and Malaysia say it was an assassination carried out by the North.
'Major, major conflict'

A war of words between the West and nuclear-armed North Korea has escalated in recent weeks, with Pyongyang threatening to carry out a sixth nuclear test.

On Saturday, North Korea conducted its second failed ballistic missile test in two weeks.

The US has sent a warship to the region and installed a controversial anti-missile defence system in South Korea.

President Trump has warned of "major, major conflict" with North Korea.

But he also said this week he would be willing to meet Kim Jong-un, in the right circumstances. The White House quickly clarified that conditions were "clearly not there right now" and said the North should "end its provocative behaviour immediately".




FULL TEXT OF STATEMENT:


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-39819922
(fair use applies)

North Korea CIA plot allegation - full text
5 May 2017

North Korea is accusing the US and South Korea of plotting to kill its leader, Kim Jong-un. Here is the full statement from the North Korean ministry of state security:

The last-ditch effort of the hostile forces, taken aback by the strong spirit of the DPRK dashing toward the final victory of the cause of Juche revolution, has gone beyond the limits after reaching the extreme phase.

The recent hysteria about "beheading operation" and "pre-emptive attack", openly staged by the U.S. imperialists and the south Korean puppet military warmongers at the doorstep of the DPRK, is just the tip of the ice berg of those moves.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the U.S. and the Intelligence Service (IS) of south Korea, hotbed of evils in the world, hatched a vicious plot to hurt the supreme leadership of the DPRK and those acts have been put into the extremely serious phase of implementation after crossing the threshold of the DPRK.

A hideous terrorists' group, which the CIA and the IS infiltrated into the DPRK on the basis of covert and meticulous preparations to commit state-sponsored terrorism against the supreme leadership of the DPRK by use of bio-chemical substance, has been recently detected.

'Human scum'

The murderous demons of the IS who conspired with the CIA ideologically corrupted and bribed a DPRK citizen surnamed Kim, the then worker of the timber industrial branch in the Khabarovsk Territory of Russia in June 2014, and turned him into a terrorist full of repugnance and revenge against the supreme leadership of the DPRK.

They hatched a plot of letting human scum Kim commit bomb terrorism targeting the supreme leadership during events at the Kumsusan Palace of the Sun and at military parade and public procession after his return home.

They told him that assassination by use of biochemical substances including radioactive substance and nano poisonous substance is the best method that does not require access to the target, their lethal results will appear after six or twelve months, bio-chemical substance can be added in cooperation with the CIA if one single correct information is obtained, the component of terrorism-purposed bio-chemical substance is the know-how of the CIA and it is only the CIA that can produce such substance, and that hardware, supplies and funds needed for committing terrorism against the supreme leadership will completely be borne by the IS. Then they handed him over 20 000 U.S. dollars on two occasions and a satellite transmitter-receiver and let him get versed in it.

In the end, they gave him assurances of IS that they would keep his duty concerning terrorism against the supreme leadership as secret, and infiltrated him after appeasing and blackmailing him that his families would not be scot-free in case he fails to carry out the duty.

In January, May, August and September of 2016 IS agents had satellite contacts with Kim who resided in Pyongyang. The IS agents gave instructions to choose and report the most effective and safe method with high probability of success while presenting him various terrorist methods using biochemical substances along with operational code of terrorism against the supreme leadership, the ways of bribing an object who would directly carry out the terrorist act and ways of entering the grounds of events.

On August 12, 2016 they gave him an instruction to collect and send as much information as possible concerning the surrounding environment of event ground where celebrations are held frequently, guard situation there and orders observed at times of events, saying that once concrete and detailed data are given, they would study the most reasonable way in cooperation with the CIA.

Urging him to set up an overseas liaison center for the safe introduction of equipment, materials and fund for the terrorist acts, they financed him 100 000 U.S. dollars on two occasions for setting up the center and bribing terrorist accomplices.

In March and April last an IS agent [name omitted] and his secret agent [name omitted], met the terrorist accomplice in Dandong of China and handed him over new satellite transmitter-receiver and 50 000 U.S. dollars. They signed a "contract" on setting up the overseas liaison center and let the necessary equipment and materials be introduced as the first instalment in early May.

'Brainwashing'

On April 7 a guy surnamed [name omitted], chief of the IS team, taught Kim the way of bribing terrorist accomplices, saying that "even the U.S. CIA uses gradual engagement with due consideration given to the greed and mentality of persons depending on which class and strata they belong" and told him to use it as a reference in engaging terrorist accomplices to be infiltrated to the event ground.

On Nov. 4, 2016 and on April 13, 17 and 20 this year they let Kim know that they officially confirmed the types of bio-chemical substance and hardware to be used for committing terrorist act against the supreme leadership and requested it to the CIA, and instructed him to restudy the "creed" of the terrorist executor and reconfirm the state of "brainwashing" of him and report about them. They also repeatedly instructed him to take the best measure for the examination and preparations for the terrorist operation, as there can be such catastrophic incident as a war once the fact about terrorist means and funds provided by the IS is known.

The chief of the south Korean puppet Intelligence Service [name omitted] praised the terrorist as a "very valuable existence for the nation and 'IS'" and directly organized the terrorist operation and let the chief of the IS team [name omitted] and agent [name omitted] take the lead in executing it. The puppet forces gave the terrorist more than 80 instructions for the execution of the operation.

Recently the CIA and the IS actively spread the story about "emergency situation in the north" while trumpeting about advantages of terrorism by use of biochemical substances as such way can minimize the adverse effect on the executor and the back-stage manipulator and help evade retaliation against the assailant side and international denunciation. Lurking behind the story was the heinous plot that has been pushed forward in top secrecy.

The DPRK Ministry of State Security clarifies as follows upon authorization since the hysteria of the U.S. and the south Korean puppet intelligence institution aimed to hurt the dignity of the DPRK supreme leadership has reached the dangerous phase which can no longer be overlooked:

1. We will ferret out and mercilessly destroy to the last one the terrorists of the U.S. CIA and the puppet IS of south Korea targeting the dignity of the DPRK supreme leadership.

We do not view the recent hideous crime just as an act of encroachment on the security and sovereignty of the state that can be committed by dishonest hostile forces.

The recent case was the most vicious challenge and the declaration of a war aimed to hurt the mental mainstay that all the Korean people absolutely trust and repose and to eclipse the eternal sun of the DPRK. It is the fixed will of the army and people of the DPRK that they can never tolerate even dreaming about such a crime.

Criminals going hell-bent to realize such a pipe dream cannot survive on this land even a moment. This is a stern punishment made on behalf of the human conscience and in the name of all Koreans.

The Ministry of State Security whose mission is to safeguard the leader, the social system and the people will ferret out to the last one the organizer, conspirator and followers of the recent hideous state-sponsored terrorism even by ransacking the whole earth, in reflection of the will of the army and people of the DPRK burning their hearts with hatred and wrath against the hideous murderous devils, no matter at which corner of the planet they may be.

2. Korean-style anti-terrorist attack will be commenced from this moment to sweep away the intelligence and plot-breeding organizations of the U.S. imperialists and the puppet clique, the most mean and brutal hideous terrorist group in the world.

Even though we wipe out all those villains involved in the recent hideous state-sponsored terrorism, there is no vouch that the enemies would stop manoeuvering as long as the chieftains and the plot-breeding bases remain.

It is not a secret that the U.S. imperialists and the puppet group of traitors are getting all the more reckless with each passing day and their moves are spearheaded against the supreme headquarters of the Korean revolution.

It is as clear as noonday that such heinous crime targeting the supreme headquarters of the Korean revolution would continue to be attempted, as long as the U.S. imperialists and the south Korean puppet group of traitors remain unchanged in their hostile policy toward the DPRK and there are CIA and IS running amuck as a spearhead in executing the policy.

Therefore, it is our determination to root up all the dens of plot and trick like CIA and IS, the source of all evils in the world, and a series of more powerful our-style anti-terrorism striking actions will begin immediately.

3. All the countries and peoples of the world that value justice and peace should resolutely turn out in the sacred struggle to terminate the heinous terrorist act committed by the U.S., kingpin of terrorism and chieftain of plot, and the south Korean puppet group of traitors.

The present international situation proves that terrorism is a common enemy to humankind and the world would have no moment of peace unless terrorism is eradicated.

'Bloodthirsty felons'


The bloody terrorist acts of CIA and IS backed by the U.S., the empire of evil, in different parts of the world surpass terrorism which is said to be perpetrated by "Islamic State" forces.

Nevertheless, the U.S. imperialists and the South Korean puppet group of traitors have often brought charge of "terrorism" to anti-U.S. states and resorted to unprecedentedly hideous terrorism without hesitation under the pretexts of "anti-terrorism war", "opposition to biochemical weapons", "sponsor of terrorism", etc.

The heinous crime, which was recently uncovered and smashed in the DPRK, is a kind of terrorism against not only the DPRK but the justice and conscience of humankind and an act of mangling the future of humankind.

The world free from fear of terrorism is no more than a daydream, as long as there exist in it such groups of bloodthirsty felons as CIA and IS, common enemies hoodwinking and trifling the humankind and outrageous destroyers of the earth.

The honest peace-loving peoples of the world should wage a joint struggle to put an end to all sorts of inhumane plots, arbitrariness and evildoings that ruthlessly trample down their desire for peace and stability.

The U.S. and the south Korean puppet group of traitors should clearly see their dirty looks as bloodstained homicidal maniac and make an apology to the DPRK for their atrocious state-terrorism and inhumane crime and immediately put the criminals to a death penalty.

If they continue to make challenges in disregard of the DPRK's warning and common desire of humankind, they are bound to meet nothing but the most miserable end in history.
 
Last edited:

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Daily Mail summarizing an article in KCNA. I also will post the KCNA article, as I prefer to read/post the source if I can find it.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4476194/Kim-Jong-praises-artillery-used-attack-South.html
(fair use applies)

'The most delightful battle': Kim Jong-un tours artillery unit used in last attack on South Korea which will be key to 'the future conflict'

By Chris Pleasance for MailOnline
Published: 04:19 EDT, 5 May 2017 | Updated: 09:54 EDT, 5 May 2017
  • North Korean leader paid visit to artillery unit used to attack South in 2010
  • Jong-un told unit to 'keep highly alert to break the backbone of the enemy'
  • Unit was used to bombard Yeonpyeong Island killing four, including two civilians
  • The dictatorial ruler praised the 'brilliant' attack as 'the most delightful battle'

Kim Jong-un has inspected an artillery unit used to bombard South Korea in the last deadly clash between the two countries.

The North Korea ruler visited the 'Hero Defence Detachment' on Mu Islet on Friday, telling troops to 'keep highly alert to break the backbone of the enemy', the state-backed Korean Central News Agency reported.

Kim also praised the unit's 2010 shelling of South Korea's Yeonpyeong Island, which killed four including two civilians, as 'the most delightful battle'.

The dictator branded the shelling 'brilliant military service' saying it was an example to 'hand down through the generations', a state media release said.

His visit was to assess the 'combat readiness' of the unit as fears of a fresh and bloody conflict in the region grow.

State media said Kim inspected new fire plans to be used in 'the future battle', and 'confirmed that all positions are fully ready for combat and to go into action.'

North Korea's shelling of Yeonpyeong in November 2010 came as the result of what it called a 'provocative shelling by the South Korean puppet warmongers'.

South Korea had been conducting a drill on Yeonpyeong in which it fired live shells into the ocean. North Korea accused Seoul of shooting into its territorial waters, a claim the South disputes, and returned fire.

In total 170 rockets and shells were fired at the island, which was then home to around 2,000 people, destroying multiple buildings and military installations.

Two members of the South Korean military were killed, along with two 60-year-old constructions workers.

Seoul said it retaliated against the North, hitting several gun positions on Mu Islet. North Korea made no mention of anyone being killed.

The shelling, which sparked anti-regime protests in the South and condemnation from around the world, was called 'the largest crisis since the end of the Korean War' by the UN.

Russia and China have sent troops and tanks to their borders with North Korea in recent weeks after President Trump sailed an 'armada' into the region, threatening to 'solve' the North Korea issue.

The two countries are believed to be preparing for an influx of refugees from the North in the event that Trump carries out preemptive strikes as a result of a sixth nuclear test, which observers believe North Korea has been preparing for at one of its underground testing sites.



https://kcnawatch.co/newstream/1493...slet-and-hero-defence-detachment-on-mu-islet/
(fair use applies)

Kim Jong Un Inspects Defence Detachment on Jangjae Islet and Hero Defence Detachment on Mu Islet
Date: 05/05/2017 | Source: KCNA.kp (En) |

Pyongyang, May 5 (KCNA) -- Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army Kim Jong Un, chairman of the Workers' Party of Korea and chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the DPRK, inspected the defence detachment on Jangjae Islet and the Hero Defence Detachment on Mu Islet located in the southernmost part of the waters off the southwest front.

He looked at Yonphyong Island at the observation post of the defence detachment on Jangjae Islet.

After receiving a report from Pak Jong Chon, director of the Artillery Bureau, on the recent movements of the enemy of the Command for the Defense of Northwestern Islands of the south Korean puppet army and the situation of the reinforced unit on Yonphyong Island, he acquainted and examined the plan for fire strike of the newly organized forces at the objects of the enemy.

He said that the KPA elite artillery group defending the southwest front should keep highly alert to break the backbone of the enemy once ordered.

Going round the firing area and gun shelters, he acquainted himself with combat readiness.

Looking round the newly-built room for turning seawater into fresh water, he acquainted himself with the production and supply of the fresh water.

He also went round the barracks, mess hall and newly-built vegetable greenhouse and stables.

He had a photo session with the service members and families of officers of the defence detachment on Jangjae Islet.

Then he inspected the Hero Defence Detachment on Mu Islet.

Going round the observation post, gun shelter and the position of gun no.1 honored with the title of DPRK Hero, he acquainted himself with the combat duty.

He said that the Hero Defence Detachment on Mu Islet smashed the reckless and provocative shelling by the south Korean puppet warmongers with the merciless shower of shells to turn Yonphyong Island into a sea of fire, thus showing the spirit of the artillery of the KPA before the enemy.

The Yonphyong Island shelling was the most delightful battle after the ceasefire and the feat of the service members of the Defence Detachment on Mu Islet is the brilliant military service to hand down through the generations along with the history of the Workers' Party of Korea, he said, adding that the recruits should steadfastly carry on the baton of the praiseworthy feats and demonstrate the mettle of the hero defence detachment in the future battle once again.

After receiving a report that the gun no. 1 of the defence detachment came first in the artillery firing contest held in March last, he encouraged the service members of the gun to take the lead in the whole army and then posed for a picture with them with the hero gun for a background.

Dropping in at the newly-built room for turning seawater into fresh water at the defence detachment on Mu Islet, he personally drank water.

Going round the barracks, education room, wash-***-bath room, etc., he took warm care of the service members.

He had a photo session with the servicemen and the families of officers of the Hero Defence Detachment on Mu Islet.

He was greatly satisfied with the combat readiness and the soldiers' living of the two defence detachments, he noted, adding that he confirmed that all the combat positions are fully ready for combat and to go into action.

He was most pleased to see that the issue of drinking water for the soldiers on those islets has been completely solved.

The duty of the two defence detachments are very important, he said, giving instructions for rounding off combat readiness at the defence detachments.

Accompanying him were KPA Vice Marshal Hwang Pyong So, director of the General Political Bureau of the KPA, Army General So Hong Chan, first vice-minister of the People's Armed Forces, Army Col. General Pak Jong Chon, director of the Artillery Bureau of the KPA, Army Col. General Ri Song Guk, commander of the 4th Corps of the KPA, Army Major General Ri Yong Chol, political commissar of the corps, and O Il Jong and Jo Yong Won who are senior officials of the Central Committee of the WPK. -0-
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Steve Herman ‏Verified account @W7VOA 37m
Kyodo: Japan contemplating deployment of cruise missiles
in response to DPRK threats.

^^^ China will have kittens... :eek:

_________


The Japan Times‏

‘Pacifist’ Japan might acquire cruise missiles
to strike North Korea: source


Kyodo
May 6, 2017
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...siles-strike-north-korea-source/#.WQzgddzFipo

The government is thinking of buying and deploying cruise missiles in
response to North Korea’s provocative missile and nuclear tests,
an official said Friday.


The government is eager to set aside funds to study the feasibility of
acquiring the ability to strike enemy missile sites, and could do so
in the draft budget for fiscal 2018, the official said on condition of
anonymity.

However, there are concerns in the government and ruling parties that
acquiring such offensive potential would contradict Japan’s exclusively
defense-oriented “posture” and trigger a backlash from the opposition
parties, even though they have shown in recent years that they are
woefully incapable of stopping the ruling camp.

According to the official, the government is looking to purchase the
Tomahawk
, the cruise missile used by the U.S. to attack a Syrian airfield
last month.

The Tomahawk is a long-range, all-weather, subsonic cruise missile.

It has enough range to hit any part of North Korea from the Sea of Japan
and can fly at extremely low altitudes, making it less noticeable to radar.

The government is considering deploying Tomahawks on Aegis-equipped
vessels in the Maritime Self-Defense Force fleet, the official said.


The ships would have to be modified to use them, if they are actually
introduced.

The United States, Japan’s security ally, was cautious about Tokyo
acquiring cruise missiles
but has since moderated its stance in light
of tensions on the Korean Peninsula, according to a Defense Ministry
source.

To acquire a strike capability, Japan would need to revise the guidelines
for its 10-year defense program ahead of schedule and review the
five-year defense buildup plan as well. Both were approved by
the Cabinet in late 2013.

A panel on security issues in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party is
expected to propose recommendations on improving Japan’s defensive
capabilities later this month, with an eye on helping the government
explore the option of attaining a strike capability as well.

In a Diet committee meeting on Jan. 26, Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe said a decision to strike enemy launch sites
when there is no alternative would fall under the
category of self-defense under the recently reinterpreted
war-renouncing Constitution
, thereby expressing his belief
that the possession of a strike capability would pose
no dilemma for Japan.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
I strongly recommend a visit to the Bomb Shelter.

(and I really, really hope that sentence won't prove to have two meanings....)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Steve Herman ‏Verified account @W7VOA 37m
Kyodo: Japan contemplating deployment of cruise missiles
in response to DPRK threats.

^^^ China will have kittens... :eek:

_________


The Japan Times‏

‘Pacifist’ Japan might acquire cruise missiles
to strike North Korea: source


Kyodo
May 6, 2017
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...siles-strike-north-korea-source/#.WQzgddzFipo

The government is thinking of buying and deploying cruise missiles in
response to North Korea’s provocative missile and nuclear tests,
an official said Friday.


The government is eager to set aside funds to study the feasibility of
acquiring the ability to strike enemy missile sites, and could do so
in the draft budget for fiscal 2018, the official said on condition of
anonymity.

However, there are concerns in the government and ruling parties that
acquiring such offensive potential would contradict Japan’s exclusively
defense-oriented “posture” and trigger a backlash from the opposition
parties, even though they have shown in recent years that they are
woefully incapable of stopping the ruling camp.

According to the official, the government is looking to purchase the
Tomahawk
, the cruise missile used by the U.S. to attack a Syrian airfield
last month.

The Tomahawk is a long-range, all-weather, subsonic cruise missile.

It has enough range to hit any part of North Korea from the Sea of Japan
and can fly at extremely low altitudes, making it less noticeable to radar.

The government is considering deploying Tomahawks on Aegis-equipped
vessels in the Maritime Self-Defense Force fleet, the official said.


The ships would have to be modified to use them, if they are actually
introduced.

The United States, Japan’s security ally, was cautious about Tokyo
acquiring cruise missiles
but has since moderated its stance in light
of tensions on the Korean Peninsula, according to a Defense Ministry
source.

To acquire a strike capability, Japan would need to revise the guidelines
for its 10-year defense program ahead of schedule and review the
five-year defense buildup plan as well. Both were approved by
the Cabinet in late 2013.

A panel on security issues in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party is
expected to propose recommendations on improving Japan’s defensive
capabilities later this month, with an eye on helping the government
explore the option of attaining a strike capability as well.

In a Diet committee meeting on Jan. 26, Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe said a decision to strike enemy launch sites
when there is no alternative would fall under the
category of self-defense under the recently reinterpreted
war-renouncing Constitution
, thereby expressing his belief
that the possession of a strike capability would pose
no dilemma for Japan.

This is the "DOT" I've long anticipated that would mark the beginning of the accelerator being floored on this convoluted multiparticipant mess.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
The Red Line of Common Sense:
The US Can't Control Russian Ports Without War


10:16 06.05.2017(updated 10:22 06.05.2017)
https://sputniknews.com/world/20170...ited-states-bill-north-korea-sanctions-ports/

Moscow lashed out at a US Congress bill on tightening sanctions against North Korea
which stipulates that the US military may establish control over ports in the Russian
Far East. The Russian Upper House warned that such actions violate international law
and amount to a declaration of war.



On May 4, the US House of Representatives passed a bill which slapped
more sanctions on North Korea and gave the Trump administration the
go-ahead to take control over Russian, Iranian, Syrian and Chinese ports
in order to ensure that no forbidden cargo reaches Pyongyang.

In particular, the bill mentions the ports of Nakhodka, Vanino and
Vladivostok in the Russian Far East.

The bill, which was approved by a 419 to 1 margin, is due to be approved
by the Senate and then signed by US President Donald Trump.

Tantamount to war
Konstantin Kosachev, chairman of the Russian Upper House's International
Affairs Committee, told Sputnik that the US House of Representatives bill
on establishing control over ports in the Russian Far East envisions a show
of force and thus amounts to a declaration of war.

"This bill, I hope, will never be implemented because its implementation
envisions a scenario of power with forced inspections of all vessels by US
warships. Such a power scenario is beyond comprehension, because it
means a declaration of war," Kosachev said.

According to him, the document, "like a huge number of other pies
baked by Congress," runs counters to international law.

"No country in the world and no international organization, primarily
the UN, has authorized the US to monitor the implementation of any
resolutions of the UN Security Council," he said.

Kosachev called the bill Washington's attempt to "affirm the supremacy
of its own legislation over international law," which he said is "the main
problem of present-day international relations." He was echoed by Alexey
Pushkov, a member of the Russian Upper House, who specifically drew
attention to the fact that the bill' final vote was 419 to 1, something that
Pushkov said "indicates the nature of the legal and political culture of
the US Congress."

"It is absolutely unclear how the bill will be implemented. To control
Russian ports, the US will have to introduce a blockade and inspect
all ships, which amounts to an act of war," he pointed out.

He shared Kosachev's view that Washington is trying to extend its
legislation to other countries.

"But there is already a red line related to a common sense," Pushkov said,
referring to the bill which he said will almost sure be adopted.

"Saber-rattling"

Andrey Krasov, first deputy head of the Russian Lower House's Defense
Committee, in turn, told Sputnik that US control of the Russian Far Eastern
ports is out of line with a general concept on maintaining international
security.

He expressed confidence that no American ship will enter Russian
territorial waters. "Why on Earth did America assume the responsibilities,
who gave it such powers to control the seaports of our country?

Neither Russia nor international organizations asked Washington to do so,"
he said.

"One can only answer that any unfriendly step by the US Administration
against Russia and our allies will receive a symmetrical adequate response.
In any case, no American ship will enter our waters. Our armed forces and
our fleet have every means to severely punish those who will dare to enter
our territorial waters," Krasov said.

He described Washington's position on the matter as nothing but
"saber-rattling."

"With a unipolar world already in place, they should accept the fact that
there are BRICS countries, including Russia, China and India, and there
is Iran; these are heavyweights which in principle do not fit into the US'
overall concept on governing and ruling the whole world," Krasov concluded.

An absurd idea and a political move
Many Russian experts agreed that the US will not be able to implement
the bill in practice.

Vladimir Baranov, head of a company which is expected to launch a ferry
line between Vladivostok and the North Korean port of Rajin, said that this
US move looks like a bluff.

"The US physically cannot control Russian ports – you have to visit the port
authority, demand documents, that sort of thing… This is essentially a bluff
by the US, an attempt to show that it controls the world.
Meanwhile, we'll be transporting whatever it is we need to transport,"
he said.

Alexander Latkin, a professor at the Vladivostok State University of
Economics and Service, for his part, said that any attempt by the US
to control Russian ports looks absurd.

"How could the US control our ports' operations? It might have been
possible if the US possessed a percentage of the ports' equity, but as far
as I know all of the shareholders are Russian. It is essentially a political
move by the US. The Americans don't have any legal or economic basis
for controlling our ports," he explained.

Meanwhile, Maxim Grigoryev, head of the Foundation for the Study of
Democracy, told Sputnik Radio that while the US House of Representatives
adopted the bill virtually anonymously, this entire situation has a touch
of tragicomedy to it.

"A declaration about keeping an eye on what's going on in Russian ports
sounds rather funny. However, what happened is that the US judicial
authority has empowered its executive counterpart to present a report
on this matter, which includes telling whether the sanctions against North
Korea are being violated via Russian, Iranian and Syrian ports," according
to him.

"I'd like to point out that the bill did not outline any inspection procedure
as it would’ve been completely pointless, but the wording itself does look
rather ambiguous. The US doesn't mind that it basically dictates that other
countries must adhere to US legislation," he said.

Furthermore, he added, this bill was likely adopted to pave the way for
another move against Russia. "Clearly this is a preparation for some sort
of statement to be made against Russia, Syria or China. This measure is
unlikely to be related to real politics, because the US doesn't have any
jurisdiction over other countries. But this is an obvious foundation for
some propaganda campaign," Grigoryev concluded.


 

Hfcomms

EN66iq

The bill, which was approved by a 419 to 1 margin, is due to be approved
by the Senate and then signed by US President Donald Trump.



These 'representatives' thought processes are a mile wide and only an inch deep.


Konstantin Kosachev, chairman of the Russian Upper House's International
Affairs Committee, told Sputnik that the US House of Representatives bill
on establishing control over ports in the Russian Far East envisions a show
of force and thus amounts to a declaration of war.

They think that Russia will meekly allow the U.S. to have oversight over it's own ports? Really? So tell me that the establishment doesn't want a world war. That is just how close we are to the end folks.
 

Be Well

may all be well

The bill, which was approved by a 419 to 1 margin, is due to be approved
by the Senate and then signed by US President Donald Trump.



These 'representatives' thought processes are a mile wide and only an inch deep.




They think that Russia will meekly allow the U.S. to have oversight over it's own ports? Really? So tell me that the establishment doesn't want a world war. That is just how close we are to the end folks.

This is one of the most insane things I've read in a long time. Do the Congressvermin even know what they voted on????
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
This is one of the most insane things I've read in a long time. Do the Congressvermin even know what they voted on????

Question 1: Are Lindsey Graham and John McCain INSANE???

Question 2: WHY is Trump LISTENING to these FOOLS (in contradiction to everything he said about returning to an isolationist position)?
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Question 1: Are Lindsey Graham and John McCain INSANE???

Question 2: WHY is Trump LISTENING to these FOOLS (in contradiction to everything he said about returning to an isolationist position)?

This is just the House version.
Wait to see what they do in the Senate to 'Spice it Up' a bit...
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The author is assuming that such strike capabilities would remain "conventional" on the part of the Japanese....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://thediplomat.com/2017/05/should-america-share-the-spear-with-japan/

Should America Share the 'Spear' With Japan?

The Japanese debate over acquiring missile strike capability needs to consider the broader alliance framework.

By James L. Schoff and David Song
May 05, 2017

With North Korea continuing to ramp up ballistic missile tests in 2017, American and Japanese policy actors face new pressure to address the growing North Korean nuclear missile threat. In fact, former Japanese Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) spent the May (Golden Week) holiday in Washington explaining his LDP study group recommendation for Japan to consider acquiring for the first time counterattack capabilities against enemy targets, in addition to expanding missile defenses.

This could be a major step for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe — who has been seeking to reinterpret and revise Japan’s post-war pacifist constitution — as well as a boon for U.S. policymakers looking for new avenues to pressure North Korea. But is it worth the potentially high political and fiscal costs for the Japanese government to pursue missile strike capabilities and enabling infrastructure?

Both U.S. and Japanese policymakers should realize that while Japan’s acquisition of long-range strike capabilities is not a silver bullet to deter North Korean aggression, such acquisition can play a positive role when considered within the larger context of the U.S.-Japan security alliance. With this in mind, the question must go beyond the North Korea issue and be reframed as part of a broader discussion on Japan’s security role in the Asia-Pacific.

The Strike Capability Debate in Japan

Although the U.S.-Japan alliance traditionally delegated the “spear” role of offensive capability to the United States and the “shield” role of self-defense to Japan, the nuclear threat from North Korea is causing Tokyo to consider some adjustments to this division of labor.

Since the 1950s, some Japanese politicians and bureaucrats have argued that offensive strikes are constitutional as long as they were for self-defense and there was no other way to defend against an attack. From this perspective (especially after years of missile defense investments), Japan must wait to be attacked before it could strike back in an effort to limit additional enemy launches.

While this theoretical strike capability gained support from nationalists and those who sought ways to hedge against U.S. disengagement, Japan’s government never deemed it necessary — instead investing heavily in ballistic missile defense (BMD) and a stronger U.S.-Japan alliance. But as recent advances in North Korean missile technology could potentially overwhelm any Japanese BMD, some policymakers in Tokyo are seeking a more comprehensive deterrent.

Domestic opponents of acquiring strike capabilities have argued that such technologies could exacerbate regional tensions and will not be an effective deterrent anyway, due to North Korean missile technology improvements and insufficient Japanese intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities. North Korea has made progress fielding mobile missile launchers, solid fuel technology, and submarine launch capabilities, which will make attempts to completely destroy North Korean attack capabilities via a quick-reaction strike increasingly difficult and improbable. North Korea’s elaborate network of tunnels and underground facilities further complicate the challenge, suggesting a truly indigenous and comprehensive Japanese counterattack capability would be exceedingly expensive.

Bringing in the U.S.-Japan Alliance Perspective

But the value of a Japanese strike capability acquisition lies less in the ability to prevent any harm to Japan via pinpoint strikes, and more with the broader picture of U.S. and Japanese security cooperation for a wide range of contingencies. Japanese acquisition of some offensive capabilities can lead to a more integrated security partnership that better synergizes the two nations’ different strengths and technologies. Such a combination could bolster the general deterrence effect of the alliance in the Asia-Pacific if it improves alliance readiness, interoperability, and mutual confidence. It can also improve allied combat effectiveness if deterrence fails. North Korea would be the primary focus, but it could bolster deterrence in the East China Sea as well.

Still, the downsides to strike capability acquisition — including cost and regional concerns — are notable. Even with Abe’s announcement last month lifting Japan’s defense spending restrictions, the high cost of acquiring a functional missile strike system raises the question about whether such systems are worth the opportunity cost. With the potential for duplicate ISR capabilities and other redundancies between American and Japanese forces, limited funding meant for strike acquisition could possibly be better spent in other defense areas including BMD, space, cyber, and maritime security. Additionally, any Japanese military acquisition must consider whether the strategic gains from any offensive capabilities outweigh the increasing worries of neighbors such as China and South Korea, who are historically wary of any Japanese remilitarization.

While the United States should be open to sharing the “spear” with Japan as a next step for the alliance, the allies need a thoughtful conversation about how Japanese missile strike or other offensive technologies can complement existing alliance capabilities. This was also a part of Onodera’s message in Washington. In light of the fiscal and geopolitical costs, Japan should move toward a measured investment in strike capabilities within the existing alliance framework to ensure the systems’ costs do not outweigh its gains, complemented by other practical military acquisitions.

James L. Schoff is a Senior Fellow in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a former Senior Advisor for East Asia Policy at the U.S. Department of Defense. David Song is a Jr. Fellow in the Asia Program at Carnegie.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...should-fear-north-korea-its-not-nuclear-20526

The Real Reason We Should Fear North Korea (And It's Not Nuclear Weapons)

[1]
Main Image

Think assassinations, bombings and kidnappings.

Kyle Mizokami [2]
May 5, 2017

As a totalitarian police state with an aggressive foreign policy, North Korea has periodically seen the need to practice terror abroad. These include assassinations, bombings and kidnappings for a variety of reasons—some politically motivated and others, in their own way, obscenely practical. Pyongyang’s agents have pulled off some of the most spectacular acts of terror in recent memory, including using a nerve agent as a tool of assassination.

On October 9, 1983, a South Korean delegation that included President Chun Doo-hwan was visiting the mausoleum of Burmese leader Aung San when a remote-controlled bomb detonated above them. The deputy prime minister, minister for foreign affairs and minister of commerce were along seventeen delegation members killed. The wreath laying was a typical gesture for heads of state visiting Burma—a North Korean delegation had performed a similar ceremony less than two months before.

According to the Central Intelligence Agency [3], three individuals, later identified as Korean People’s Army officers, were later killed in shootouts with Burmese security forces. The three-man team, a size considered typical for North Korean covert operatives, had planted the bomb and were trying to make their way to a North Korean ship, the Tonggon Aeguk-Ho, anchored in Rangoon harbor. A silenced .25-caliber Belgian pistol, daggers, hand grenades, a Morse radio transmitter, a Japanese receiver and medical supplies were among the equipment later recovered.

On November 29, 1987, Korean Airlines Flight 858 was flying from Saddam International Airport in Baghdad to Gimpo International Airport outside Seoul, South Korea, with stopovers in Abu Dhabi and Thailand. On the second leg of its flight, the Boeing 707, filled with South Korean construction workers returning from the Middle East, exploded over the Andaman Sea. All 115 passengers and crew were killed.

Not long after, two individuals were detained in Bahrain when it was discovered the Japanese passports they traveled under were forgeries. The individuals, actually North Korean agents, took cyanide pills when they realized they were being detained. The older, male agent died, but the younger, twenty-five-year-old Kim Hyon-hui, survived. Kim recovered and made a full confession, stating that the pair had been given a time bomb disguised as a transistor radio by other agents in Yugoslavia, and were instructed to place the bomb aboard the aircraft. The two placed the bomb, a timed device consisting of 350 grams of C-4 and a small amount of PLX liquid explosives [4], in an overhead cabin bin when they boarded in Baghdad. The two exited the plane in Abu Dhabi, where they were detained on false passports.

According to Kim Hyon-hui, Kim Jong-il, the son of President Kim Il-sung (and future leader of North Korea and father of current leader Kim Jong-un), had ordered the bombing to destabilize the South Korean government. The bombing had occurred on the thirty-fourth anniversary of the end of the Korean War. The bombing was also supposed to frighten international athletes away from the 1988 Seoul Olympic games, which North Korea was deeply jealous of.

One of North Korea’s longest-running covert operations was the kidnapping of Japanese citizens [5]. This was done for a number of reasons, including identity theft (the victim, usually older, was quickly killed); the procurement of interpreters and outsiders to teach North Korean agents Japanese language, culture and mannerisms; and even to procure brides for Japanese Red Army agents residing in Pyongyang. The Japanese were typically kidnapped on the western side of Japan, facing North Korea, but there were victims as far away as Denmark and Spain. The Japanese government recognizes seventeen official kidnapping victims, although the true number may reach into the hundreds.

The kidnapping campaign was likely carried out by North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau, which has one unit specifically set up for external operations. Japanese men and women would simply disappear doing ordinary things, typically within earshot of the ocean. Landing parties would kidnap individuals, drug them and then take them out to sea in small boats. From there, the unconscious victims would likely be loaded onto fishing boats or perhaps even submarines for the five hundred mile trip back to Chongjin, North Korea.

North Korea has halted the kidnapping process and returned some abductees, but has not come clean about the entire scope of the operation. The kidnapping campaign is even more perverse in light of the fact that North Korea had plenty of citizens who had recently lived in Japan and who could have easily carried out the tasks given to the abducted, making the whole operation completely unnecessary.

The most recent North Korean covert operation was the assassination of Kim Jong-nam, half-brother of Pyongyang’s current ruler Kim Jong-un. Kim Jong-nam, once considered the favorite of his father Kim Jong-il, fell into disfavor after a failed attempt to travel abroad to visit Tokyo Disneyland. He lived in exile for more than a decade but was killed in March 2017 at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Malaysia.

Kim was inadvertently killed by two women, one Indonesian and one Vietnamese, who thought they were participating in a television prank. Instead of baby oil, however, they unknowingly contaminated their target with deadly VX nerve agent. Kim complained of illness, collapsed and died a short time later. Four North Koreans were suspected of directing the attack, one an employee of state airline Air Koryo, while another carrying diplomatic status. The agents were apparently carrying out a standing order [6] by President Kim Jong-un for his half-brother’s assassination.

Pyongyang has conducted fewer covert operations in recent years, for reasons unknown. One reason might be that certain political leaders, such as Kim Jong-il, might have felt more emboldened than others. The decline might also be chalked up to an internal realization that North Korea’s political and military isolation make such acts more risky. No longer a client state of the Soviet Union, or even China, North Korea no longer has a patron state to hide behind. North Korea has instead shifted to direct military attacks such as the sinking of the corvette ROKS Cheonan by torpedo and the artillery bombardment of Yeonpyeong Island. Still, as Kim Jong-nam’s assassination proves, the country is still willing to conduct direct—and lethal—covert operations abroad.

Kyle Mizokami is a defense and national-security writer based in San Francisco who has appeared in the Diplomat, Foreign Policy, War is Boring and the Daily Beast. In 2009, he cofounded the defense and security blog Japan Security Watch. You can follow him on Twitter: @KyleMizokami [7].

Image [8]: South Korean soldier briefs U.S. Army Gen Martin E. Dempsey. DVIDSHUB/Public domain

Tags
Special Operations [9]North Korea [10]defense [11]war [12]South Korea [13]Military [14]
Topics
Security [15]
Regions
Asia [16]
Source URL (retrieved on May 6, 2017): http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...should-fear-north-korea-its-not-nuclear-20526
Links:
[1] http://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...should-fear-north-korea-its-not-nuclear-20526
[2] http://nationalinterest.org/profile/kyle-mizokami
[3] https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000408056.pdf
[4] http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2006-08-11/news/0608110261_1_explosives-kiger-ingredients
[5] http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/north-koreas-abduction-project
[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/world/asia/kim-jong-nam-assassination-north-korea.html?_r=0
[7] https://twitter.com/KyleMizokami?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
[8] https://www.dvidshub.net/image/782877/dempsey-south-korea
[9] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/special-operations
[10] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/north-korea
[11] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/defense
[12] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/war
[13] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/south-korea
[14] http://nationalinterest.org/tag/military
[15] http://nationalinterest.org/topic/security
[16] http://nationalinterest.org/region/aisa
 

Illini Warrior

Illini Warrior
The 40 South Korean sailors aboard the sunken destroyer and several soldiers who were killed in mortar shelling during North Korean attacks a few years ago would beg to differ, except that they're dead.


they killed a US Army officer with an axe in the DMZ border area .... and seizing US ships in international waters tends to be a differ also ....
 
Top