GOV/MIL Most Americans want to end lifetime Supreme Court appointments

TerryK

TB Fanatic
Bottom line. Most Americans want to end lifetime appointments and either have term limits or age limits.
They DO NOT want to increase the number of justices.




Most Americans want to end lifetime Supreme Court appointments
2 minutes read
A view of the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. January 19, 2021. Susan Walsh/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

A view of the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S. January 19, 2021. Susan Walsh/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

A majority of Americans want to end lifetime appointments for U.S. Supreme Court justices, according to an Ipsos poll for Reuters, though less than half are in favor of other efforts to reform the judiciary.

The national opinion poll, conducted on Thursday and Friday, found that 63% of adults supported term or age limits for Supreme Court justices. Another 22% said they opposed any limits and the rest did not express an opinion.

The poll also found that only 38% would support expanding the size of the court by adding four more justices. Another 42% said they would oppose doing so and the rest were unsure.

Liberal activists and some legal scholars have been pushing for judicial reforms as Republican leaders in Congress built a 6-to-3 conservative Supreme Court majority over the past several years, in part by blocking a Democratic nominee and allowing Republican former President Donald Trump to install three picks during his single term.

Some Democratic lawmakers on Thursday introduced legislation to expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices, a move that they believe would restore public confidence in the judicial branch. But the party's leadership appeared cool to the idea of pursuing that course.
President Joe Biden has formed a bi-partisan committee to look at the merits of adding justices as well as other potential reforms to the court.

While Congress has the power to change the number of justices who sit on the court, legal scholars believe it would likely require a constitutional amendment to end their lifetime appointments.

The poll found that only 49% of Americans have a "great deal" or a "fair amount" of confidence in decisions made by Supreme Court justices. In comparison, 43% of respondents expressed a similar amount of trust in decisions made by the White House and 32% said the same of decisions made by Congress.


The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted online, in English, throughout the United States. The survey gathered responses from 1,003 adults. The results have a credibility interval, a measure of precision, of 4 percentage points.
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
I favor all politicians (Judges are political animals as well), have to:

1. Take and pass random drug tests
2. Provide a complete audited financial report every year showing all sources of income
3. Take and pass a basic physical from a randomly selected provider AND once reaching the current SS full retirement age, take and pass a standardized minimum test for mental competency and cognitive administered by randomly selected none government provider
4. CAN NOT exempt themselves, their family members, business partners or businesses that they or their relatives have any ownership or stock positions, from any laws they pass.
 

Walrus

Veteran Member
I don't particularly favor the idea of term limits for Supremes but wouldn't be opposed to an age limit - call it 80 just off the top of my head.

I would entertain the idea of a Supremie having to be subject to a confirmation of their continued status every so often - say every 10 or even 15 years, with no campaigning on their part or political contributions allowed. If they received a majority of the voters' approval, they would continue for another "term". If they didn't receive a majority of the votes cast, then they'd be subject to reconfirmation by the Senate as they were originally. Depending on the way the country goes careening through history, maybe it'd be a balancing force for the judiciary. I'm almost certain this could never happen as it would require a pretty complex constitutional amendment but think of the possibilities when a Supremie goes "Roberts" on us.

Or something. I obviously haven't thought this through very well but I just grabbed onto a stray thought while reading this thread.
 

pauldingbabe

The Great Cat
Rotate the chief justices every so often and age limits.

All of these 3 branches of govt are supposed to be part time jobs. I also think the states should recall they're senators. Why should we pay for them to have 2 offices? Keep con critters as messengers between state and fed.
 

Night Breeze

Veteran Member
No age limit, if A Justice can render Justice at 79 why not at 80? I believe some justices over the years have passed their expiration date it works for both sides of the court. The Dems are wanting a couple of old liberal judges to retire so they can be replaced by younger liberals but so far no takers. Younger judges have died while still doing their jobs well. The President and Senate then have to make those changes. No mercy from the liberals but the Bush appointees have not always been the Conservative voices it was expected. John Roberts is an example. Just glad Trump got t pick 3 during his term. I still think Biden will pick a couple before he is finished. Just hope the Senate goes Republican in 2022.
 

Night Breeze

Veteran Member
If a Justice died today it is Biden's Constitutional duty to nominate a new justice and the Senate's job to here the nomination and vote on it. 51 takes the nomination. just the way it is. If Biden nominated Ted Cruz so be it. Now everyone is asking who Biden would nominate?
 

Tripod

Veteran Member
It doesn't matter what the majority of Americans want. The democrats are in full power and will do as they damn well please. That should have been obvious long ago even before they stole full power, and we let them get away with all of it.
Mike
 
Top