ECON More than 1/3rd of California households have virtually no savings, risk of financial ruin

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
November Sierra Sherlock.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/soc...ngs-are-at-risk-of-financial-ruin-report-says

More than a third of California households have virtually no savings, are at risk of financial ruin, report says

By Kevin Smith, San Gabriel Valley Tribune
POSTED: 07/25/17, 9:57 AM PDT | UPDATED: 2 HRS AGO 182 COMMENTS

More than 37 percent of California households have so little cash saved that they couldn’t live at the poverty level for even three months if they lost a job or suffered another significant loss of income.

That’s the grim assessment of the 2017 Prosperity Now Scorecard. The report was compiled by Prosperity Now, a Washington, D.C.-based organization seeking to help people — particularly people of color and those with limited income — achieve financial security and prosperity.

The scorecard also shows that 46 percent of households in the Golden State didn’t set aside any savings for emergencies over the past year, a higher percentage than the national rate of 43.7 percent.

It doesn’t help that 21.1 percent of California jobs are in low-wage occupations. The scorecard found that 21.4 percent of Californians experienced income volatility over the past year, a situation that most often results from irregular job schedules.

HOUSEHOLDS OF COLOR

It gets worse for households of color. They are nearly twice as likely to live below the poverty line as white households — 18.2 percent compared to 9.7 percent — and they are much less likely to own a home or other assets that could help boost their long-term financial stability.

Less than half of California’s households of color (43.9 percent) own homes, compared to 62.5 percent of white, non-Hispanic households. Moreover, 60.7 percent of Latino households and 56.7 percent of black households have virtually no savings and are considered “liquid asset poor,” compared to 28.2 percent of white households fitting that category.

“Beyond providing a cushion to get families through emergencies, increased savings and wealth allow families to invest in their futures and gain ground for future generations,” Prosperity Now President Andrea Levere said in a statement. “It’s clear that far too many people are stuck in economic limbo.”

HIGH HOUSING COSTS

Lars Perner, an assistant professor of clinical marketing at the USC Marshall School of Business, said California’s high housing costs have put many households on shaky financial ground.

“The cost of housing in California is exorbitant,” he said. “That’s a big part of the problem. People pay a disproportionate amount of their income toward housing.”

The report finds that nearly 20 million U.S. households (16.9 percent of the total) have zero or negative net worth. That means they owe more than they own.

GETTING ON TRACK

The scorecard suggests several policies that could help get struggling households on track:

• Providing an income boost through policies like the federal and state earned income tax credit.

• Encouraging saving: Oregon is leading the way as a model of state support by authorizing $7.5 million in state funding for its Individual Development Account program in 2016. That is an asset building tool designed to enable low-income families to save towards a targeted amount, which is usually aimed at home ownership.

• Improving policies that increase the minimum wage: California has already made headway in this regard. Ten California cities and localities boosted their minimum wage on July 1. Pasadena, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, Malibu and Santa Monica hiked their minimum wage for businesses with 26 or more employees, from $10.50 to $12 an hour. Companies with 25 or fewer workers will experience the same increase next year. Subsequent pay hikes will boost the minimum pay rate for businesses with 26 or more workers to $15 an hour by 2020, and smaller businesses will reach that level a year later.

• Creating increased access to home ownership: This refers to first-time homebuyer support at the federal and state levels, including programs that increase access to affordable mortgage products, incentivized matched savings products and property tax relief.

• Increasing retirement security: Retirement security is elusive for the 55 million workers without access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan. Of those workers, 41 percent are black, Latino or Asian. Automatic-enrollment Individual Retirement Accounts help families shore up their savings and decrease the likelihood that income volatility and unexpected expenses will derail plans to invest in their future.
 

West

Senior
This will just get worse and worse across the nation, as penalties are laid on top of those who are successful for being independently successful. And free stuff (safety nets) giving out for being poor. Many people who could be independently successful don't go that extra bit over the line to be able to qualify for free stuff like EBT, healthcare and subsidised housing. Also child support penalizes many good men to just say screw it and just do enough to survive.

Small business is the incubator of employment. As it declines, so too do opportunities for first jobs, second chances and economic independence.
 

Hfcomms

EN66iq
Wonder why? Governor Moonbeam and his ilk in Sacramento have squeezed the taxpayer beyond the limits. Businesses are fleeing the State if they can and all the politicians want to do is to have more entitlements and open the doors wider to the illegals. Geeze....I wonder why people have a financial crunch? Can't figure it out.
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What happens in California is often a barometer of what happens to the rest of the US over time.

We are in trouble financially for a number of reasons:

1) We have a consumer based society that is fueled by the marketing of immediate gratification of the self.....

2) Our primary means of the consumption is the marketing of debt instruments to the exclusion of prudent saving.

3) Finally, we take those most responsible in society and tax them to provide for those who are the most irresponsible in society which fuels that behavior while penalizing the former.........

That model will cycle to failure every time it is implemented.
 

West

Senior
Yeah, this is why the rich liberal nuts want a universal income distribution system set up.

I might get behind it IF all safety nets and the current 17 (iirc) bureaucracies that redistribute the tax payers blood money's was eliminated along with the payroll liabilities mandated in the private sector on employers.

Like that would ever happen.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
Isn't this also the case outside of California? Something like two thirds of the country can't cover an unexpected bill for $400?
 
Top