COMMUNISM Marxist Lucifer King (the truth about this "holiday" celebrated on Jan 15th)

Teeja

On the Beach
Seems like this is a good time to post this documentary.

Video summary:
Martin Luther King, Jr. was not the hero and wonderful "man of God" the government will be "celebrating" this coming Monday, January 15th. He was, in fact, a womanizing communist sympathizer. These facts have generally been scrubbed from the Internet, although us "older folks" remember when most everyone knew King was a commie scumbag. Today, the populace has been fooled by the leftists. This film gives the details.

It's entitled "Marxist Lucifer King". Run time is 48min, 28 sec.

 
Last edited:

Squib

Veteran Member
Just another blatant sign that this country is fallen, when we celebrate a communist, adulterer, and fallen minister…

So, why not!

Let’s get together with some POC friends for some fried chicken and watermelon and watch as the hammer of God’s judgment falls.

Watch while we piss away generations of spiritual blessing passed down to us because of our godly fore-bearers.
 

Teeja

On the Beach
What's amazing to me is that even conservatives seem to be totally ignorant of MLK's debauchery and communist ties. The leftist propaganda machine has done an excellent job over the past 30 years or so. Even Ronald Reagan caved to make this pervert into a national hero, while today's "conservative" leaders hold this commie rat-fink up as some sort of martyr for the cause of right. Makes me sick to my stomach. The younger generations have absolutely no clue.

How is it that so many people have fallen for the lies and propaganda?
 

Abe Froman

Senior Member
What's amazing to me is that even conservatives seem to be totally ignorant of MLK's debauchery and communist ties. The leftist propaganda machine has done an excellent job over the past 30 years or so. Even Ronald Reagan caved to make this pervert into a national hero, while today's "conservative" leaders hold this commie rat-fink up as some sort of martyr for the cause of right. Makes me sick to my stomach. The younger generations have absolutely no clue.

How is it that so many people have fallen for the lies and propaganda?
Department of Education has done its job.
All it takes is one generation.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Pastor Anderson has done a masterful job of putting all the agricultural amendment in one place.

Some of these MLK issues I have mentioned. Others I was not aware of.

I wish he would "explain" rather than proselytize. Admit proselytizing is his normal speaking modus.

The "follow up" is even more effective.

Dobbin
 

Great Northwet

Veteran Member
I'm going to have to call BS on this one.

After Lincoln freed the slaves in 1863, northern Republicans went into the South after the war ended and got blacks voting and even elected in some cases. But then they left in the mid 1870's. Southern Democrats responded by forming the Klan and Jim Crow laws that held blacks down for many decades until the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954 that began to open up opportunities for them again.

MLK understood this. He was a card carrying, conservative voting Republican.

The Democrats don't want you to know that, but anyone can just look it up.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
I'm going to have to call BS on this one.
Read your friend and mine Wikipedia. A lot of what Anderson puts out is repeated there which is a surprise knowing Wiki as we do. (i.e. "Leftist) Wiki does tend to put MLK as "the center of the storm."


Everyone worldwide reveres Gandhi for his non-violent activism. However, Gandhi was not exactly admired in India either during his tenure.

A prophet is not without honor except in his own country, among his own relatives, and in his own house.

Dobbin
 
A general observation, without really referring to MLK.
Wikipedia is well known to be highly biased on certain subjects. Climate change, for one. You cannot write a truthful article and submit it without it being slanted to warmism by editors. You correct it, it gets reworded, or just deleted. Ivermectin treating Covid, same. Jabs “safe and effective”, of course they are. Certain doctors are maligned…. There’s an agenda, for sure. It’s not reliable for some subjects. Sure, anybody can contribute, but anybody can edit as well. Certain users have the power to control things more than others.
 

Teeja

On the Beach
I wish he would "explain" rather than proselytize.

Umm... he is a pastor, and much of the clips in the documentary were taken from one of his sermons. And, he's simply trying to reach other people for Christ. That's his primary goal in life as a Pastor of a New Testament church. I think we should give the guy a break - he's not the enemy.

MLK understood this. He was a card carrying, conservative voting Republican.

You are seriously misinformed, I'm afraid. At first I thought you were joking because of the absurdity of your statement. He may have been at one point a registered Republican (many sources say that's a falsehood), but one thing he was NOT, and that is "conservative". Unless you believe that communists are conservative.
 
Last edited:

Teeja

On the Beach
On Wikipedia, an article can seem "conservative" one day, and "liberal" the next, depending upon who the last person to edit the article was. The content is especially fluid, since anyone can edit any article and it can be immediately changed from one person to the next. It's an ever-changing mess, and for the most part, many of the editors who spend all their time in their mother's basement, and who do nothing but edit Wikipedia, are leftist control freaks. So that's why Wikipedia tends to be liberal in most major political articles.
 

Donner9x

Thread Killer :-)
It may be true that all the negative evidence regarding Martin Luther King is correct, and I'm not saying one way or another. I don't know, and it could be that he is all the bad things people say he is. Regardless, the moment I saw that this film was by, and featured Stephen L. Anderson (at least featured in the beginning), I was resolved not to watch another moment of it. That guy is about the least Christian-acting supposed Christian, that a person can be. Look him up, watch some of his YouTube videos (unless all the negative ones have been scrubbed) - it's been some years since I've seen anything of his.

But I will tell you this, from what I saw of him previously, I wouldn't trust that guy with my pet hamster, let alone the truth. You could tell by his actions and his so-called preaching that the guy was full of hate and vile. All I'm saying is, I would take everything this man says with a huge truckload of salt, regardless of the actual veracity of his claims. You might want to get your actual facts from another, more reliable source.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth.
 

Seeker22

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What's amazing to me is that even conservatives seem to be totally ignorant of MLK's debauchery and communist ties. The leftist propaganda machine has done an excellent job over the past 30 years or so. Even Ronald Reagan caved to make this pervert into a national hero, while today's "conservative" leaders hold this commie rat-fink up as some sort of martyr for the cause of right. Makes me sick to my stomach. The younger generations have absolutely no clue.

How is it that so many people have fallen for the lies and propaganda?

Even Ronnie Ray-gunz gave us the Gun Control Act of 1968 when he was governor of California.
 

Teeja

On the Beach
But I will tell you this, from what I saw of him previously, I wouldn't trust that guy with my pet hamster, let alone the truth. You could tell by his actions and his so-called preaching that the guy was full of hate and vile. All I'm saying is, I would take everything this man says with a huge truckload of salt, regardless of the actual veracity of his claims. You might want to get your actual facts from another, more reliable source.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth.

Your opinion is worth exactly what I paid for it.
 

Mercury3

Veteran Member
It may be true that all the negative evidence regarding Martin Luther King is correct, and I'm not saying one way or another. I don't know, and it could be that he is all the bad things people say he is. Regardless, the moment I saw that this film was by, and featured Stephen L. Anderson (at least featured in the beginning), I was resolved not to watch another moment of it. That guy is about the least Christian-acting supposed Christian, that a person can be. Look him up, watch some of his YouTube videos (unless all the negative ones have been scrubbed) - it's been some years since I've seen anything of his.

But I will tell you this, from what I saw of him previously, I wouldn't trust that guy with my pet hamster, let alone the truth. You could tell by his actions and his so-called preaching that the guy was full of hate and vile. All I'm saying is, I would take everything this man says with a huge truckload of salt, regardless of the actual veracity of his claims. You might want to get your actual facts from another, more reliable source.
Just my opinion, take it for what it's worth.
huh? Most of us are smarter than this. I had my facts from long ago and had never even heard of this guy or his info.
 
Top