MSM Market to Market April 9 2021 Ag Report - Must read as they discuss current drought conditions

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.

Market Analysis: Roose, Seifried, Blohm and Bennett
Apr 9, 2021 | Ep4634 | Podcast
Yeager: For the week, May wheat jumped 28 cents while the nearby corn contract added 18 cents. The soybean complex is looking for a story to break out of the range trade. May soybeans gained a penny. May meal lost $9. May cotton expanded by $4.45 per hundredweight. In the dairy parlor, May Class III milk futures widened by $1.01. A green week in the livestock sector. June cattle expanded 3 cents. May feeders put on 40 cents. And the June lean hog contract increased $2.62. In the currency markets, the U.S. Dollar index declined 78 ticks. May crude oil shed $1.96 per barrel. COMEX Gold improved $15.20 per ounce. And the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index lost more than two points to finish at 471.80.

Yeager: Let's introduce our panel. Here to provide insight are Don Roose, president and founder of U.S. Commodities. Naomi Blohm, she is the Senior Market Advisor for Total Farm Marketing. Ted Seifried, Chief Market Strategist at Zaner Ag Hedge. And Matthew Bennett, co-founder of Ag Market.Net.

Yeager: Good to see all four of you in person. We did this back to start the year half in, half out, so good to see you both. Good to see you both Ted, frequent drive miles, good to see you again. Naomi, let's start with today's report. You had a simple headline for it. Why don't you lay it out for us?

Blohm: Yeah, the report was definitely bullish for corn. We had a big drop on those ending stocks. And then it was neutral for soybeans coming in line with expectations with ending stocks staying unchanged at 120 million bushels. In a sense it's a way that the USDA can kick the can down the road a little bit more. I think the ending stocks are tighter than what they are saying. But they did raise the export number on this report so that was good because they needed to do that, the demand has just been so strong. And what I loved about the corn report was that they were able to increase demand for every category, feed, ethanol and exports. So that really paints a rosy picture for corn prices going forward with 150 million bushel cut on the carryout.

Yeager: So Ted, a couple of weeks ago you had laid out a scenario of what could happen and what this report might mean. Did any of your what you had thought get confirmed today?

Seifried: I'm going to disagree with Naomi. I don't think what we saw today was bullish really. The corn number was friendly but it was expected and it has been expected for the last four months. So finally seeing it on paper and you see the reaction of the market, it wasn't bullish, it wasn't the spark that we needed to continue the strength that we had seen earlier in the week. In fact, we ended up giving back some of that in old crop. But for soybeans I saw a problem there. This was the USDA drawing a line in the sand at 120 million bushels saying that is as low as we're going to go unless we see something extraordinary to make us increase another category. But they made a lot of changes on their balance sheet. Yes, the carryover stayed the same. But they changed crush, they lowered it by 10 million bushels. They increased exports by 30 million bushels. They increased seed by 2 and they lowered residual, all that give you the same number. They did a lot of jockeying in order to keep that 120 million bushel. And now that exports are 30 million bushels higher, and we just saw last week that number came down and could continue to come down if we see more cancellations, it's really hard to say that we're going to run out of soybeans between now and the end of the marketing year. So the price rationing job in soybeans probably has been done. I think we have come to a timeframe where we could probably see a step back in soybeans. I do think markets could get spicy again as we get into the summer months because next year's situation, as you said in the open, could actually be better and the old crop soybeans at some point are going to have a job to do which is carry as many beans into next year as possible. But the USDA is saying we're not going to run out of beans.

Yeager: Matt, do you see a line in the sand or fireworks ahead?

Bennett: I see a line in the sand and I think that as soon as you get the April report printed the first thing you do is you take carryouts and you look at the acreage that we got just a week ago and you start filling in your supply and demand table. And so to agree with Ted, I think that you've got such a tight situation that moving forward yeah, you could see major fireworks. Whenever you look at corn, for instance, if you take, you've got 1.352 right now, that's your carry in, you have to use 911 in May. You need about 180 bushel yield to stay at 1.352. That's if you don't drop your carryout even more. And I do think there could be a further reduction as far as the corn carryout goes. How much remains to be seen. As far as soybeans are concerned yeah, you stay at 120, but whenever you use the 87.6 it just does not work. And so you're going to have to buy some acres. Are they there to buy? There's a few but probably not as many as what everyone seems to think that there is.

Yeager: All right. Don, I saw the two head bobs agreeing with Matt. Where are you at on that?

Roose: Well, I think when you look at these markets there's very little margin of error on corn or soybeans. I think that is pretty well a known fact. But this report was really, I think when you look at the U.S. situation these whole markets have been about what is going on in the world the whole time, Chinese buying, everything else. And this report to me was more about the world market. You took the soybeans up in Brazil, you took the carryout in the world up like 113 million. Even more than that your biggest buyer, China, you took the crush down 2 million metric tons. That's a lot. So that tells you you're backing up meal there. And at the same time you left the imports on corn and soybeans unchanged. And when you look at the corn it's unimaginable almost you would think that it's going to stay there. But we've got 600 million bushels of corn to export yet. And I think what the government is saying is we're not going to export all that corn. China is not going to take all the corn. So I think it's one that we're in a pause level right now, Paul.
Yeager: All right.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Part 2

Yeager: For the week, May wheat jumped 28 cents while the nearby corn contract added 18 cents. The soybean complex is looking for a story to break out of the range trade. May soybeans gained a penny. May meal lost $9. May cotton expanded by $4.45 per hundredweight. In the dairy parlor, May Class III milk futures widened by $1.01. A green week in the livestock sector. June cattle expanded 3 cents. May feeders put on 40 cents. And the June lean hog contract increased $2.62. In the currency markets, the U.S. Dollar index declined 78 ticks. May crude oil shed $1.96 per barrel. COMEX Gold improved $15.20 per ounce. And the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index lost more than two points to finish at 471.80.

Yeager: Let's introduce our panel. Here to provide insight are Don Roose, president and founder of U.S. Commodities. Naomi Blohm, she is the Senior Market Advisor for Total Farm Marketing. Ted Seifried, Chief Market Strategist at Zaner Ag Hedge. And Matthew Bennett, co-founder of Ag Market.Net.

Yeager: Good to see all four of you in person. We did this back to start the year half in, half out, so good to see you both. Good to see you both Ted, frequent drive miles, good to see you again. Naomi, let's start with today's report. You had a simple headline for it. Why don't you lay it out for us?

Blohm: Yeah, the report was definitely bullish for corn. We had a big drop on those ending stocks. And then it was neutral for soybeans coming in line with expectations with ending stocks staying unchanged at 120 million bushels. In a sense it's a way that the USDA can kick the can down the road a little bit more. I think the ending stocks are tighter than what they are saying. But they did raise the export number on this report so that was good because they needed to do that, the demand has just been so strong. And what I loved about the corn report was that they were able to increase demand for every category, feed, ethanol and exports. So that really paints a rosy picture for corn prices going forward with 150 million bushel cut on the carryout.

Yeager: So Ted, a couple of weeks ago you had laid out a scenario of what could happen and what this report might mean. Did any of your what you had thought get confirmed today?

Seifried: I'm going to disagree with Naomi. I don't think what we saw today was bullish really. The corn number was friendly but it was expected and it has been expected for the last four months. So finally seeing it on paper and you see the reaction of the market, it wasn't bullish, it wasn't the spark that we needed to continue the strength that we had seen earlier in the week. In fact, we ended up giving back some of that in old crop. But for soybeans I saw a problem there. This was the USDA drawing a line in the sand at 120 million bushels saying that is as low as we're going to go unless we see something extraordinary to make us increase another category. But they made a lot of changes on their balance sheet. Yes, the carryover stayed the same. But they changed crush, they lowered it by 10 million bushels. They increased exports by 30 million bushels. They increased seed by 2 and they lowered residual, all that give you the same number. They did a lot of jockeying in order to keep that 120 million bushel. And now that exports are 30 million bushels higher, and we just saw last week that number came down and could continue to come down if we see more cancellations, it's really hard to say that we're going to run out of soybeans between now and the end of the marketing year. So the price rationing job in soybeans probably has been done. I think we have come to a timeframe where we could probably see a step back in soybeans. I do think markets could get spicy again as we get into the summer months because next year's situation, as you said in the open, could actually be better and the old crop soybeans at some point are going to have a job to do which is carry as many beans into next year as possible. But the USDA is saying we're not going to run out of beans.

Yeager: Matt, do you see a line in the sand or fireworks ahead?

Bennett: I see a line in the sand and I think that as soon as you get the April report printed the first thing you do is you take carryouts and you look at the acreage that we got just a week ago and you start filling in your supply and demand table. And so to agree with Ted, I think that you've got such a tight situation that moving forward yeah, you could see major fireworks. Whenever you look at corn, for instance, if you take, you've got 1.352 right now, that's your carry in, you have to use 911 in May. You need about 180 bushel yield to stay at 1.352. That's if you don't drop your carryout even more. And I do think there could be a further reduction as far as the corn carryout goes. How much remains to be seen. As far as soybeans are concerned yeah, you stay at 120, but whenever you use the 87.6 it just does not work. And so you're going to have to buy some acres. Are they there to buy? There's a few but probably not as many as what everyone seems to think that there is.

Yeager: All right. Don, I saw the two head bobs agreeing with Matt. Where are you at on that?

Roose: Well, I think when you look at these markets there's very little margin of error on corn or soybeans. I think that is pretty well a known fact. But this report was really, I think when you look at the U.S. situation these whole markets have been about what is going on in the world the whole time, Chinese buying, everything else. And this report to me was more about the world market. You took the soybeans up in Brazil, you took the carryout in the world up like 113 million. Even more than that your biggest buyer, China, you took the crush down 2 million metric tons. That's a lot. So that tells you you're backing up meal there. And at the same time you left the imports on corn and soybeans unchanged. And when you look at the corn it's unimaginable almost you would think that it's going to stay there. But we've got 600 million bushels of corn to export yet. And I think what the government is saying is we're not going to export all that corn. China is not going to take all the corn. So I think it's one that we're in a pause level right now, Paul.

Yeager: All right.

Blohm: Regarding the corn export, my thought with that is that on paper prior to today's USDA report we have sold pretty much 100% of the USDA expectations and export inspections, so what has actually left the country has been half of that. So we have been able to get over a billion bushels out of this country in the first seven months of the marketing year and we got rid of 2 billion bushels of soybeans at the same time. So we have I think physically and travel capacity wise the ability to make sure that the rest of that corn gets moving out of the country and I think we can get it done in the next five months but it's definitely something the market is watching. I know it's a hot topic. I respect that. But the contacts at ADM think it's going to be able to get done. But I think we can do her.

Seifried: Yeah, but Naomi, maybe it's not a capacity problem. We don't seem to have a capacity issue. We can get these exports out. But when you have China, when you have all of these exports backing up, old crop exports backing up to China, it makes you wonder why that is happening. Is it China saying, hey we're not ready for those yet, don't send that yet? And they’re dealing with a lot of soybeans not from us anymore but really from Brazil. But if they don't have the urgency for the corn it makes you really wonder okay, is that going to happen this marketing year, because you've got 14 million metric tons still yet to ship to China and then let's call it another million and a half that comes out of the unknown category, that is very likely China, is that going to happen between now and the end of the marketing year? It's not a capacity issue, it's an urgency issue. China doesn't have the urgency so I think very likely a good portion of that is going to get rolled into next year. Personally I think the final ending stock number that we see for corn is going to be much higher than a 1.3. It's probably going to be 1.5 or 1.6. But the demand will still be there, it will just be for next year.

Yeager: So Matt, there's a theory right now out there that we're trading four things. We're trading the weather, demand, crop conditions and the USDA. It sounds from what I've just heard that seems accurate. Is there a fifth out there right now that we're not talking about that we need to in this discussion?

Bennett: Okay. Whenever I look at this corn market whether you talk U.S., you've got to talk Brazil as well. Whenever you look at southern Brazil they're dry. This market is probably partially supported at this time by the fact that Brazil has some dryness issues. Whenever we're trying to go to the field there's several folks that are rolling in the Midwest and it looks like we could have a decent spring for early planting. Now I know the weather is not ideal, it's not perfect. But at the same time we're dry enough and whenever you have a dry spring typically acreage goes up. And so I've got to think we could pick up a little bit of acreage but we have to keep a close eye on the safrinha crop because in my opinion if the safrinha crop does not turn out to be a big one as was suggested with 108 million metric tons I think it's premature to call it that but if we don't come up with anything close to that I think that you're looking for major support in this corn market moving on forward.
Yeager: Go ahead, Don.

Roose: I was just going to say, the one thing I think Matt is alluding to is these markets are all about risk premium in the market for all these things that we don't know about that could go wrong and it's possible and that's why we're up here. But they also could go the other way too and so you have to be very careful when you're looking at that because remember we always take the stairs up, the elevator down. So at some point in time you run out of this premium. And typically when you hit the spring is when if you get the crop planted, it looks like you are, you take some of the risk out. So I think that is partly what the market is about right here.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Part 3

Yeager: So Ted, I need to get into a weather story. I'll lead you further down the discussion here, Ted. Boyce in Montpelier, North Dakota where we know it's dry in the state, with the drought in the north and soybeans presumably stealing acres from wheat could spring wheat surprise us and end up being the big market story this summer?

Seifried: Hey, Boyce. Yes. Well, there could be a lot of big market stories this summer potentially. But yeah, spring wheat, talking to my guys in the Dakotas they're having a really hard time getting planted. It's so dry, cold, windy, going from super hot to super cold. It has not been good. So if that spring wheat doesn't get in, in a timely fashion, like really pretty soon there's going to be thoughts of moving that over to row crops and I think you are going to see about a million acres shift, maybe not that much, but a significant amount of acres shift over to row crops. So yeah, there's a lot of wheat in the world. There's a lot of, the winter wheat you don’t really have a tight situation there but spring wheat could lead the whole wheat complex higher and I really like the chart on the spring wheat right now. I think there is quite a bit more upside unless there is a very dramatic change in the weather pattern in short order.

Yeager: Well, Kansas City, the July futures opened nearly a gap higher earlier this week. You had Kansas City I believe set a contract high. So, Matt, is there one of these contracts that is going to be a brighter star or duller performer?

Bennett: Well, in my opinion it's about got to be spring wheat. Are you going to be led by winter wheat whenever we just found out last week we had 2.6 million more acres than maybe what we thought we were going to have? And so I've got to think it's going to be spring wheat. And this isn't usually the time of year where the wheat market is leading the pack. And so it spells good things for me in the grand scheme of things. Are we going to see support for the wheat market from both corn and beans? I don't know that you would get a ton of support. But if the wheat market is rallying sharply as far as spring wheat is concerned absolutely, I think that it's a good thing for everything. A rising tide lifts all boats.

Yeager: Naomi, the livestock side of this equation, is that playing into this at all about a feed issue that corn got so expensive that wheat has now come to the day?

Blohm: We have been talking about that for a couple of months that that possibility would be coming down the road. So wheat has a lot of different moving parts to it right now. The USDA on the report today actually said that we would maybe not be using as much wheat for feed this coming year. Back to the spring wheat, the last time we were together in January I said that's the market that is going to be the one to watch and I was bullish about it back then because of all of these moving parts that are starting to come into play. Spring wheat definitely the leader. I think what you're going to see is traders doing spreads between buying the spring wheat, selling the Chicago wheat, as a way to get long the wheat. So the wheat is still the follower in the grains but the spring wheat has the ability to become the leader of the pack.

Yeager: Don, am I using wheat, if I'm a corn farmer, maybe I'm one of them that still has grain in the bin, am I paying attention closer to the old crop price of corn right now? Or am I paying a little closer attention to wheat on signals on when I should sell?

Roose: Well, it's the wrong time of the year to be bullish on wheat. Now, maybe spring wheat because of the dry drought condition in the north, that's possible. But the corn market I think you really have to watch these markets. The basis usually tells the truth. And the basis is pretty tight right now, staying tight in spreads. So I would watch those two signals as your real key. And by the way, we did have a key reversal in May corn today and we do have a big premium the May over the July, so when you look at moving out to the next month you're moving to a discount. So is this going to be the tightest point that we have between now and the first of May?

Bennett: We had a reversal last week as well though after the planting intentions. And so I agree with you, any time you see a reversal in the market you've got to pay close attention. But then we picked up quite a bit of ground on corn again this week. And so I agree with Don, you've got to watch the basis, you've got to watch the spreads, and there's no question that some originators all over the country actually are very nervous. You hear about not only really good basis levels but paying overs over the posted bid. And so there's no question in my mind that corn is going to be pretty good ownership for the time being. But, as a producer you've got to ask yourself whenever you're two dollars plus over last fall's price do you want to be bullish? At what point does greed take hold of you? You've got to be careful to get too greedy here.

Seifried: You also had a reversal in that May/July corn spread today too. So, look, a reversal doesn't necessarily mean a high. But when you start seeing a series of reversals these are all red flags that hey, we might be coming to a near-term top for now. And the volatility that we saw this week, at the end of last week and this week, that is also sort of indicative of the possibility of a near-term high. So guys need to be looking at that really very closely. It's also the right time of year for me with a good looking planting forecast to say okay, we can take a step back here. And personally I'd love to see that because that would open a whole lot of reownership opportunities for me.

Blohm: Yeah, and then how about also with the May conversation that we're having, May and July, the fact that maybe funds are going to start to exit out of any long May and start rolling into the July because we're getting closer to first notice day too. So it may not be just indicative of a bigger correction just like you were saying but there's just a lot of little simpler moving parts underneath as well. And loving how the basis throughout the Midwest continues to get strong and stronger. We had 280 on plants reopening for ethanol this week, in the middle of this high prices that they're reopening these ethanol plants I think that really says something about their optimism going forward. So that's exciting to see.

Yeager: I was going to ask you a December question but instead I'll ask you this. I'll ask kind of the same thing I did to Don. Would you be selling -- how much longer are you holding old crop corn right now?

Blohm: Oh, just trickling it along and make sales.

Yeager: You're still holding some but making --

Blohm: Keep making sales every time this market is making moves.

Yeager: Are you anxious, any of you, to pull trigger on December right now?

Seifried: I've been suggesting 30% to 50% on December. Again, if we get a bigger correction, you look for reownership strategies, as Don was saying earlier there's a lot of risk and there's a lot of risk premium that has been built into the market. There's also a lot of risk that things change, demand destruction, things like that, that could make the market go down and I think you need to be managing that risk by making these sales. I'd love to see guys close to 50% sold on new crop corn at this point.

Roose: Well, and I think you have to remember just a year ago the market was on its knees. So if you don't think things can change and change fast they can. So when you're at price risk management levels that make sense you should at least be looking at some percentage of sales.

Yeager: Well, Matt, the soybean market, one of those that was at our knees a year ago, even six months ago, was a struggling one. It is in the shadow of everything right now. Ted kind of alluded a little bit that he sees a story coming. Do you see a story coming, a bullish picture coming? We've been stuck near $14 for about three weeks now.

Bennett: Yeah, we've just been kind of flailing along here, not really doing a whole lot. Just in my opinion on beans, whenever you look at how tight the situation is it's hard to get super bearish. But at the same time as a producer, you run the numbers on cash beans, how do you get bullish at $14? Now, I'm not saying as a trader you can't. But as a producer if I'm looking at new crop soybean prices whispering on $13 here lately, we're above $12.50, I'll tell you what, you can put a floor under the market significantly above any sales that you've made for quite some time and let the upside run if you want to. But I kind of like selling a few beans and buy a short-dated call if you want. But I want to stay flexible because I think you could see major fireworks this summer with any hint of a weather issue.

Yeager: Uh-oh, fireworks, did you just get excited?

Blohm: We need at least 90 million acres of soybeans to plant if not more, like you were saying earlier. So we're not going to know that data until the end of June of course. But that keeps the market overall supported between now and the end of June. And so it's just really exciting for producers. But you're right, don't lose sight of the value in front of you because it's amazing value but there is potential for upside if the stars continue to align.

Roose: And November soybeans you're talking from a producer level are trading about 40 cents higher than July '22. So from a producer are you going to carry beans for eight months and lose 40 cents? I don't think so. So when you hit the fall timeframe there's going to be a merchandising challenge for a lot of people.

Seifried: Paul, I've been saying since the beginning of the year and we've been doing this that November beans are the most undervalued contract on the board, on the grains board. I still think that's the case. You look at what is happening for next year if we don't get 90 million acres, which it would be unprecedented to go from an 87 to 90, if we don't get 90 million acres, if we don't have a 52 or 53 national average yield, given the demand outlook it looks like we're going to be wildly negative soybeans on our balance sheet for next year. Now, not saying that demand is necessarily going to be there. I would really like to see some new crop soybean export sales on the books. We were off to a good start but then we really flattened out, saw a little bit last week, I'd like to see more. But if we don't have a reason to think that demand is going to get destroyed we are really set up for a very interesting scenario for new crop beans.

Bennett: I agree. And here's the thing I'll say. Whenever you look, it's going to be hard to get those acres, first of all. Second of all though, if you look at the yields possible where the beans are being planted are actually in high yielding states if you look at the planting intentions. And so there is a possibility that we could look at a very large national yield. But at the same time on the record, I'll tell you what, I think that Dec corn and November beans are actually something that both could rally just a little bit based upon this acreage situation. We have to get more acres if we're going to make both balance sheets look really good.

Yeager: Naomi, I've got to have you answer this question. Are beans losing acres to cotton because of cotton's performance over the last three months, six months?

Blohm: Cotton is saying don't forget about me, that's what cotton is saying. We have that brilliant rally, that four, five month rally and then a setback recently. Today's report was supported. They increased the exports for cotton, which they should have because sales were at 104% so they needed to reflect that on the report today. So with cotton prices showing a little excitement, we hit a recent low, starting to build back higher, yeah it's definitely saying don't forget about me. So cotton is definitely back in this conversation and I think we still have spring wheat in the conversation along with the other markets. So it is an exciting time for agriculture, that's for sure.

Yeager: Don, there's a saying about the cattle market right now, there's optimism that beef demand is phenomenal. But the question is where will reality and optimism meet in the cattle market?

Roose: Well, what has happened right now is you've got a grain premium you're kicking in. Look at next year's April cattle got up to $133. But really it's about the demand market. The demand is so strong. That is really what is pushing us to the upside. Packer margins are huge, $600 a head. But where are we going to go from here? Seasonally we usually start to top out right now. So are we going to do it normal seasonal? Today the government put out projections. They're like $120 for the fourth quarter and for the summer they're like $115 to $117 so we've got a lot of premium in the market but it's a grain premium and you actually need it on the meat market at the present time.

Yeager Matt, the feeder we talked about it a little bit trying to figure out is there something else you feed with. But if you're a backgrounder right now feeding cattle are you worried?

Bennett: I'd say I'd be a little bit worried. The thing is if you buy feeders right now and then you look at feed and then you look at fats on out to the fourth quarter into February it's pretty thin. So you've got to be cautious. What is a cattle producer going to do? He's going to step out on a limb and go out on faith and that is something that they have always done. You've got to be really cautious though and I don't want to go out here and just hedge cattle and not do anything about my feed costs because quite frankly if this summer doesn't turn out to be a good weather pattern your feed costs could soar through the roof. So you've got to be really cautious there.

Yeager: Ted, a hog came to shore in Taiwan this week, tested positive for African swine fever, thought to have come from China. What is that doing to the world hog market? Is it impacting the global or the U.S. market more?

Seifried: The U.S. market is hoping that we're going to see a fair amount of exports to Southeast Asia, China in particular, late spring, summer months. You look at where August hogs are trading, it's really pretty impressive. Exports have been pretty good even without China. China was on but barely on, didn't make a big splash on this last week's export sales report. But it was still a really solid number. Domestic demand is really good. Cutout values are on fire. There's reason why hogs continue to make new contract highs. It's a really good looking chart. I think there's more upside potential for hogs.

Yeager: Is there, Don?

Roose: Well, I tell you, I look at it a little bit different. As the U.S. market is going up the rest of the world is going down. China, their hog prices are under our hog prices. They're down 37% since a year, we were down 10% this week on hogs. Our exports were poor down 10% over a year ago in February. So I'd be pretty leery of the hog market. It's solid now on disease and demand but keep an eye on it.

Yeager: Naomi, is the dairy market solid right now?

Blohm: It is a really nice time in the dairy markets, prices have been on an upswing in part because the global dairy trade auction has been higher nine out of the last ten sessions. Our actual cheese prices are lower than global prices right now so that is strong. Whey prices are improving, they're at the highest level since 2014. And with grain prices improving that is also lifting the milk prices. So we've got front month milk contracts mid-$19 level, which in and of itself without that extra farm to family food program were seeing this marketplace do its own thing. Production levels are up but starting to decline. And so going forward depending on how the feed situation is this summer we might see more production declines if the quality isn't there. I know that where I live in Wisconsin we are, it's going to be tricky sourcing soybeans. So it is a friendly market for the dairy.

Yeager: That's Naomi Blohm. Thank you so very much, Naomi. Ted Seifried is here. Don Roose is here. Matthew Bennett. Thank you all. Time flies when you're having fun but we're just getting started. That will do it for the TV side. We're going to do a web thing called Market Plus here in just a moment so join us there. Find that on our website of MarkettoMarket.org. Now, a reminder, it is spring fieldwork season. Duh. But that doesn't mean that you have an excuse for missing our weekly analysis, the Market Plus or the MtoM podcast. All are able to go where you go. Subscribe to all three and take us along for the ride. Remember, we do like cab time as well. Next week we take a look at new weapons that are helping pollinators in the fight against colony collapse disorder. Thank you so much for watching. Have a great week.

Trading in futures and options involves substantial risk. No warranty is given or implied by Iowa PBS or the analysts who appear on Market to Market. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Market to Market is a production of Iowa PBS which is solely responsible for its content.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
As a state, we probably need to be doing more with better water management: correctly built retention ponds around new commercial construction would be a good start. Also, some places along the river should either be left alone or made into small parks, not drained sub-divisions. They flood. They are supposed to flood, and that would help keep some water in the upland water tables.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
As a state, we probably need to be doing more with better water management: correctly built retention ponds around new commercial construction would be a good start. Also, some places along the river should either be left alone or made into small parks, not drained sub-divisions. They flood. They are supposed to flood, and that would help keep some water in the upland water tables.

The city here, in it's infinite wisdom, removed thousands of trees in the flood plain along the local river that drains into the Des Moines much further down stream. Those trees, mainly sycamores, birches, and cottonwoods, take up an immense amount of water when it floods along this river... which happens almost every single year in this particular spot. I have no idea what it's going to do to the water table now that those trees have been removed, or what it will happen now when we get an annual flood or a really bad flood year.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
I heard about that. I hope they aren't planning to dump a bunch of those wire cages with rocks in the area and then build a crappy retention pond and put up condos like they did along Four Mile Creek in Ankeny. That's why that low section of East Des Moines got flooded several summers ago. Idiots. If it were up to me, there would be at least a one mile set-back all along Four Mile Creek (as one example). Leave the trees and wetlands alone, other than maybe a bike trail and a few concrete benches.

This is not Colorado. Our rivers are much deeper. Excessive flooding impacts the water tables. We need stronger local government and alert voters to keep some of these fly-by-night developers out of Iowa.
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
With the drought conditions over so much of the USA, if we have a bad crop year, this report doesn't give me a warm fuzzy.

Column: U.S. corn exporters rack up monstrous volumes on their way to record books

FORT COLLINS, Colo. (Reuters) - Market participants have patiently awaited a boost in U.S. corn exports to match the record yearly expectation, but the wait is officially over as recent shipments have blown past nearly every benchmark.

U.S. corn exports in February hit 6.3 million tonnes (248 million bushels) according to official census data published on Wednesday. That tops 2008’s record for the month by 17% and is the largest monthly volume since July 2018.

January corn exports had missed the month’s all-time high by a handful of cargoes, and the December volume was the biggest in 13 years. That marked a much-needed reversal from the average export pace observed in the first quarter of 2020-21 that began on Sept. 1.

Weekly export data suggests that March shipments reached an all-time monthly record by a long shot, likely topping 9 million tonnes. The largest-ever volume is 7.75 million tonnes set in May 2018, and the March high is 6.7 million from 2017.


1618166007835.png

The U.S. Department of Agriculture sees 2020-21 corn exports at a record 66 million tonnes (2.6 billion bushels), though the agency will have a chance to update that in its monthly report on Friday, and many analysts believe the number must go up.


That expected increase, along with the record annual prediction, is largely driven by unusually strong sales to China. Through March 25, China had booked 23.2 million tonnes of U.S. corn for the 2020-21 year. The prior high for U.S. corn exports to China was 5.15 million in 2011-12.

In the first half of 2020-21, U.S. corn shipments to China reached 7.1 million tonnes, leaving a lot of work for exporters in the second half. However, export inspection data implies that the March volume to China likely topped December 2020’s all-time high of 1.53 million tonnes.

U.S. corn exports last month were not huge just because of China, which is important since nearly two-thirds of all sales on the books are destined for other countries.

China accounted for roughly 19% of all corn inspected for export in March, implying more than 7 million tonnes may have been shipped to other destinations. There are only four other months on record where corn exports to countries other than China topped that mark. Non-China exports were also anomalously high in February.

A strong second quarter means the pressure is not as high on the second half of 2020-21, but stronger volumes are still needed. Assuming March came in at just over 9 million tonnes, corn shipments in the remaining five months would need to average about 5.8 million tonnes each.


Historically, that is very doable as it is far short of 2018’s average of 7 million tonnes for that period. However, if USDA should raise exports to 2.8 billion bushels, for example, that would require a million more tonnes per month between April and August, still below 2018’s record.

Through March 25, U.S. corn sales for 2020-21 totaled 99.5% of USDA’s full-year target, well above typical levels and supportive of analysts’ theory that the agency must raise the forecast.

There are concerns that cancellations or rollovers to the next marketing year could be larger than normal due to the huge level of commitments. It is a bit too early to know how much that might factor in, but it is important to remember that USDA’s projection reflects the expected amount of exports and not necessarily the sales on the books.

++++
Zero Hedge has this added information


China has primarily driven strong US corn exports. By Mar. 25, Beijing booked around 23.2 million tons of US corn for the 2020/21 year. The previous high for US corn exports to China was 5.15 million in 2011/12.

In January, we first noted that China customs data showed that grain imports soared to record highs in 2020 after tight domestic corn supplies pushed prices to multi-year peaks, driving demand for cheaper imports.

The USDA forecasted 2020/2021 corn exports at a record 66 million tons, and there's a chance in the upcoming growing season, the number could be much higher due to China's increasing demand.

This is happening as corn prices have nearly doubled since August.



... prompting a very worried Albert Edwards to warn about rapid food inflation could result in socio-disturbances unless food prices stabilize and revert to much lower levels (see "Why Albert Edwards Is Starting To Panic About Soaring Food Prices.") The first places where unrest could happen due to higher food prices are in emerging market countries.

In the meantime, soaring corn exports and prices are a blessing for US farmers who have had their farm incomes collapse in recent years.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
I heard about that. I hope they aren't planning to dump a bunch of those wire cages with rocks in the area and then build a crappy retention pond and put up condos like they did along Four Mile Creek in Ankeny. That's why that low section of East Des Moines got flooded several summers ago. Idiots. If it were up to me, there would be at least a one mile set-back all along Four Mile Creek (as one example). Leave the trees and wetlands alone, other than maybe a bike trail and a few concrete benches.

This is not Colorado. Our rivers are much deeper. Excessive flooding impacts the water tables. We need stronger local government and alert voters to keep some of these fly-by-night developers out of Iowa.

This is what we are concerned that they will be doing, and long term it affects crops in the immediate vicinity, not just the water table.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
With the drought conditions over so much of the USA, if we have a bad crop year, this report doesn't give me a warm fuzzy.

Column: U.S. corn exporters rack up monstrous volumes on their way to record books


thank you for the link. There's a thread here at TBK about the drought out west, it seems to be creeping further east with each passing month.
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
thank you for the link. There's a thread here at TBK about the drought out west, it seems to be creeping further east with each passing month.

My AO is on the outer edge of of some of the best farm ground in Illinois and I can tell you from the decades I've lived here, this has been one of the driest winters in my memory. Very little snow and only one or two that actually left enough on the ground to melt into the soil. So far it's been a dry spring. Only one good soaker and not enough by any means. It's corn and beans land. Low supply and high prices is good for the farmers who are lucky enough to get good crops in a dry year, but it raises the price on feed and the animal feed jumps, making meat much higher priced. With China making record purchases, that will just put more pressure on America's stocks.

The drought map:
U.S. Drought Monitor
1618169598149.png
1618169921665.png
1618169966465.png
The food map(S):

1618169304231.png
1618169442114.png
1618170740013.png
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
The USDA needs to update that drought map, central Iowa is in extreme drought conditions right now, you dig down six or so feet and the soil is bone dry. Like Meemur said the water tables here are at severe risk right now, people need to be encouraged to start water saving techniques lest they find themselves w/o water this coming summer.

IIRC I heard at one time, way back in the 80's that WW3 would be fought over water and the lack there of. Is Nestle still selling water from the great lakes to China???
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
In the region I'm in there no drought and it just rained for the last three days my garden is soaked, the onion's are coming up good and have nothing else planted yet, but if it can dry out enough to till soil I'm planting.
 
Last edited:

anna43

Veteran Member
Fifty years ago when I lived in Des Moines we had a house on E. 35th with Four Mile flood plain right across the road. The first time the water came across the road I knew it was time to get out. I went to high school in Ankeny so was aware of the flooding on Four Mile each year and in 1970 I realized with the cementing of Ankeny that flooding was only going to get worse where we lived. So glad to get out of that flood plain especially seeing what has happened in recent years.

Where I now live in NW Iowa we were in severe to extreme drought (and exceptional a few times) most of last summer and even though we've had recent rains we are still short on ground moisture. I heard on local radio farm news that we are in year 2 of 7 year drought cycle. I really DIDN'T want to hear that!!!
 

homecanner1

Veteran Member
Wisc DNR issued report of fire risk in woods up there across the river from me, from drought conditions. We need every drop of this rain forecast thru Wednesday!
 
Top