Denninger summing it up nicely.
MarketTicker Forums - Discussions About Investing
market-ticker.org
On Maricopa...
[Comments enabled]
What did we learn Friday?
1. Maricopa claimed there were
no duplicate mail-in ballots. In fact there were
far more duplicates than those required to change the outcome in the Presidential race. That has now been established. Either (1) Maricopa
lied but
actually de-duplicated the ballots (meaning the results stand)
or Maricopa
did not de-duplicate the mail-in envelopes and the results are impossible to validate because some 17,000 duplicate votes were cast.
2. Maricopa
lied about their election management system
never being connected to the Internet. It has been
conclusively and forensically established that indeed it was. When it was
is immaterial; the lie, standing alone, is enough.
3. Maricopa
intentionally violated federal
law in the maintenance of electronic records
specifically including the chain of custody by not issuing individual login credentials to the authorized users for each function. This is a direct violation of federal law and it was an intentional act.
These are laws, not suggestions.
4. One or more people
intentionally destroyed security logs. At least one such person has been positively identified. That is a criminal act, standing alone, and must be prosecuted.
5. The databases were intentionally destroyed by one ore more persons. The person who did #4
either conspired with said person(s) who destroyed the databases, was the person who did so, or did so to cover up the act without knowing who committed the first act. Whatever the facts on that linkage may be it was a deliberate, criminal act standing alone and must be prosecuted.
6. The so-called "auditors" hired by Maricopa are
criminally incompetent or even worse,
actively involved in the above. They must be named
and prosecuted. Specifically, they failed to inspect the unallocated disk space on the EMS, a
basic part of forensics as criminals
often delete evidence of their activity. Said material
was still there, so had the "auditors" hired by Maricopa been competent they
would have discovered it.
What was
not proved was that Trump won. But what
was proved was that there is no honest assertion that can be made that
either of the two Presidential candidates in serious contention won. The margin of victory is within the margin of dispute
and it has been
proved that electronic records critical to validate what occurred throughout the election process were deliberately destroyed by persons(s) who had physical access to the systems in question, with at least one such person being allegedly identified by security camera footage.
There may well be more here -- but what's been discovered
thus far and proved (and for which the evidence is now in the public domain) shows that:
1. The election in Maricopa County for federal offices, including President, was not conducted in accordance with Federal Law.
2. The results, based
solely on the count of duplicated ballot envelopes (people who voted more than once), which exceeds the margin of victory for the Presidential Office,
are not able to be confirmed since once duplicate ballots are removed from the envelopes it is impossible to identify them. Maricopa county claimed
no such duplicates exist. We now know
more than 17,000 in fact do exist
and the envelopes still exist. What we cannot prove one way or another is whether the ballots
inside those envelopes were counted and, if only one was counted,
which one was counted. We thus have
no way to know who won.
3. The persons
running the election have made materially false statements
on an intentional basis about the equipment
never being connected to the Internet.
4. The persons
running the election both
deliberately destroyed data related to the election in direct violation of Federal Law
and, as a separate and distinct offense,
attempted to cover up that destruction and identification of the person who did so. This act, standing alone, demonstrates
intent to tamper with the election results.
5. The vast majority of said deliberately destroyed data was not recoverable
and likely is not recoverable.
By
forensic evidence, not presented and unrebutted, the outcome of the election in Arizona
was falsely certified.
What's the remedy for this?
That's a separate debate -- but that this
one county alone did in fact corrupt their election, did so intentionally, and did so in such a fashion that
at this time it not possible to know what the result actually was is not subject to reasonable dispute.
Finally, not only was their forensic computer person credible he displayed exactly the process that I, as a person skilled in the art and who has performed computer forensics, would utilize. I found no fault in his procedures, his process and analysis. Not did I find him to make a single unproved assertion of fact. This is exactly what a professional is supposed to do in this field.