WAR Main Persian Gulf Trouble thread

jward

passin' thru



Joseph Haboush
@jhaboush


NEW: The State Department has approved the sale of Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) upgrade and other equipment to #Bahrain in a deal worth over $175M.
"The proposed sale will improve #Bahrain’s capability to meet current and future threats by enhancing Bahrain’s ability to defend itself against regional malign actors and improve interoperability with systems operated by US forces and other Gulf countries," the Pentagon says.
 

jward

passin' thru






TRT World Now
@TRTWorldNow


Saudi-led coalition says it started operation to "neutralise" targeting oil facilities, affecting security and to protect "global energy sources" from hostile attacks - Al Arabiya TV
View: https://twitter.com/TRTWorldNow/status/1507518761439477764?s=20&t=7vzxG-WHLmp3R3DQ8XXm9w


#BREAKING: Massive fire at Aramco Facility in Saudi Arabia’s Jeddah following reported missile strike View: https://twitter.com/BreakingIEN/status/1507371292835692562?
 

jward

passin' thru
Saudis Launch Retaliation Strikes On Yemen As Houthi Missiles Threaten Nearby Formula 1 Race
Tyler Durden's Photo

by Tyler Durden
Saturday, Mar 26, 2022 - 11:40 AM

Saudi state sources on Saturday said the Saudi coalition thwarted another attempted Houthi attack on oil tankers off Yemen's coast. SPA said Saudi forces have destroyed explosive-laden boats which were being prepared for an "imminent attack on oil tankers" in Yemen’s Saleef port and Hodeidah port.

At least four "weaponized boats" belonging to the "Iran-banked Houthis" were neutralized, according Saudi military statements. It's part of an ongoing retaliation operation following Friday's major missile and drone attack against several oil and infrastructure sites in the kingdom's south, which set a large fire at a Jeddah Aramco facility.

AFP/Getty: Saudi Aramco oil facility in Jeddah following a reported attack by Yemeni rebels.
The response has included ramped up airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition against sites in Yemen. SPA said the coalition is protecting global oil security and shipping during the operation, as the Yemen war has reached seven years this week.
"The Coalition cited protection of global energy sources as reason for the military operation, affirming that it will directly target hostile agents and avoid civilians and oil facilities," state-run SPA reported. "It added that it has practiced self-restraint in response to the recurring Houthi militia attacks on oil facilities, saying that the military operation is in its preliminary phases and will go on until it accomplishes its objectives."

The Saudi military said it's launched fresh airstrikes against "threatening agents" that are "being executed in Sanaa and Hodeidah governorates." A Houthi military spokesman had confirmed in statement that the Yemeni rebel group was behind Friday's wave of attacks.
The Saudi energy ministry had meanwhile said the kingdom will "not be held responsible" for any shortage of oil supplies to global markets caused by the attacks, which in the past weeks have ramped up.
The Houthi missiles have threatened Jeddah's second ever major Formula Grand Prix event...
The #SaudiArabianGP will continue "as planned" despite an attack by Yemeni rebels on an oil facility which set off a huge fire visible from Jeddah's street circuit#F1 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix To Continue "As Planned" Despite Rebel Attack | Formula 1 News
— NDTV Sports (@Sports_NDTV) March 26, 2022
"Drivers continued to practice Friday night even as the smoke billowed in the distance," according to reports. Amid the alarm that the inbound missiles caused, it was determined the race will go on: "The decision to race was made only after an hours-long meeting where several drivers shared serious safety concerns with organizers, according to reports."
 

jward

passin' thru
Saudi airstrikes hit Yemen’s Houthis after Jiddah attack
By AHMED AL-HAJ and SAMY MAGDYtoday


Yemeni police inspect a site of Saudi-led airstrikes targeting two houses in Sanaa, Yemen, Saturday, March 26, 2022. A Houthi media office claimed an airstrike hit houses for guards of the social insurance office, killing at least seven people and wounding three others, including women and children. (AP Photo/Hani Mohammed)

1 of 17
Yemeni police inspect a site of Saudi-led airstrikes targeting two houses in Sanaa, Yemen, Saturday, March 26, 2022. A Houthi media office claimed an airstrike hit houses for guards of the social insurance office, killing at least seven people and wounding three others, including women and children. (AP Photo/Hani Mohammed)


SANAA, Yemen (AP) — A Saudi-led coalition fighting Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen unleashed a barrage of airstrikes on the capital and a strategic Red Sea city, officials said Saturday. At least eight people were killed.
The overnight airstrikes on Sanaa and Hodeida — both held by the Houthis — came a day after the rebels attacked an oil depot in the Saudi city of Jiddah, their highest-profile assault yet on the kingdom.
Brig. Gen. Turki al-Malki, a spokesman for the Saudi-led coalition, said the strikes targeted “sources of threat” to Saudi Arabia, according to the state-run Saudi Press Agency or SPA.
He said the coalition intercepted and destroyed two explosives-laden drones early Saturday. He said the drones were launched from Houthi-held civilian oil facilities in Hodeida, urging civilians to stay away from oil facilities in the city.
Footage circulated online showed flames and plumes of smoke over Sanaa and Hodeida. Associated Press journalists in the Yemeni capital heard loud explosions that rattled residential buildings there.Business

Biden budget to trim $1T from deficits over next decade

Crypto for Ukraine provides a flow of war-related assistance
mazon tries to stave off union drive on two fronts

China says no survivors in plane crash with 132 on board

The Houthis said the coalition airstrikes hit a power plant, a fuel supply station and the state-run social insurance office in the capital.

A Houthi media office claimed an airstrike hit houses for guards of the social insurance office in Sanaa’s Haddah neighborhood, killing at least eight people and wounding four others, including women and children.
The office shared images it said for the aftermath of the airstrike. It showed wreckage in the courtyard of a social insurance office with the shattered windows of a nearby multiple-story building.

Hamoud Abbad, a local official with the Houthis in Sanaa, said the facility is located close to a building used by the U.N. agencies in the capital. He claimed that U.N. vehicles were seen leaving the area prior the the airstrikes.
In Hodeida, the Houthi media office said the coalition hit oil facilities in violation of a 2018 cease-fire deal that ended months of fighting in Hodeida, which handles about 70% of Yemen’s commercial and humanitarian imports. The strikes also hit the nearby Port Salif, also on the Red Sea.
Al-Malki, the coalition spokesperson, said it targeted drones being prepared in Hodeida to be launched on the Kingdom. He accused the Houthis of using civilian infrastructure, such as Hodeida’s ports and the Sanaa airport, to launch attacks on Saudi oil facilities, according to SPA.
Late Wednesday, coalition airstrikes rained on Houthi-held areas in Hodeida, al-Malki announced. No immediate casualties were reported.

A U.N. mission overseeing the Hodeida deal voiced concern about the airstrikes and urged warring sides to “maintain the civilian nature of the ports and avoid damage to civilian infrastructure.”
“Once again we are seeing civilians bearing the brunt of this conflict which is just getting worse every year,” said Erin Hutchinson, Yemen director at the Norwegian Refugee Council, a charity working in Yemen. “This escalation is going to do nothing to elevate the hardships that millions are going through.”

The escalation, which comes on the seventh anniversary of the Saudi-led coalition’s intervention in Yemen’s war, is likely to complicate efforts by the U.N. special envoy for Yemen, Hans Grundberg, to reach a humanitarian truce during the holy month of Ramadan in early April.
It comes as the Gulf Cooperation Council plans to host the warring sides for talks late this month. The Houthis however have rejected Riyadh — the Saudi capital where the GCC is headquartered — as a venue for talks, which are expected to include an array of Yemeni factions.

The Houthis also announced Saturday a uniliteral initiative that included a three-day suspension of cross-border attacks on Saudi Arabia, as well as fighting inside Yemen. They demanded an end to the coalition air and sea blockade on their territories before engaging in negotiations.
Peter Salisbury, Yemen expert at the International Crisis Group, doubted that ongoing efforts will succeed in bringing a peaceful settlement to the grinding war in the near future, given that international attention is now focusing on other crises including the war in Ukraine.

“I really wouldn’t buy into any optimism we’ll see diplomatic progress in 2022,” he said. “It’s pretty clear that all parties are still looking for ways to either win outright or cause significant damage to their rivals.”
Yemen’s brutal war erupted in 2014 after the Houthis seized Sanaa. The Saudi-led coalition entered the war months later to try restore the internationally recognized government. The conflict has in recent years become a regional proxy war that has killed more than 150,000 people, including over 14.500 civilians. It also created one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.

The Houthis’ Friday attack came ahead of a Formula One race in the kingdom on Sunday, raising concerns about Saudi Arabia’s ability to defend itself against the Iranian-backed rebels. The Houthis targeted the same fuel depot that they had attacked in recent days — the North Jiddah Bulk Plant that sits just southeast of the city’s international airport and is a crucial hub for Muslim pilgrims heading to Mecca.
Satellite photos from Planet Labs PBC analyzed by The Associated Press showed one of the two tanks damaged in the Houthi attack on Jiddah still burning late Saturday morning. Bright red flames leapt up from the tank, with thick black smoke rising from the fire.

The attack appeared to target new tanks, as a tank twice struck by the Houthis just two rows north appeared untouched in the new attack. A tank alongside the burning one appeared to have white wrap and fire-suppressing foam around it.
In Egypt, hundreds of passengers were stranded at Cairo International Airport after their Jiddah-bound flights were canceled because of the Houthi attack, according to airport officials.

The kingdom’s flagship carrier Saudia announced the cancelation of two flights on its website. The two had 456 passengers booked. A third canceled flight with 146 passengers was operated by the low-cost Saudi airline Flynas.
Some passengers found seats on other Saudi Arabia-bound flights and others were booked into hotels close to the Cairo airport, according to Egyptian officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because there were not authorized to brief media.
___
Magdy reported from Cairo. Associated Press writer Jon Gambrell contributed from Dubai, the United Arab Emirates.
 

jward

passin' thru





Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

20m

#BREAKING: Reuters reports a nascent plan for #Iraq's Kurdistan region to supply gas to #Turkey and #Europe - with Israeli help - is part of what angered #Iran into striking Erbil with ballistic missiles this month, Iraqi and Turkish officials say. 1/3
Key here is "part of what angered." It was a multi-pronged message--with the recent volley of drones between #Israel and #Iran and the deaths of two members of the IRGC in #Syria likely all playing a part.
Noteworthy: "There had been two recent meetings between Israeli and **U.S. energy officials** and specialists at the villa to discuss shipping Kurdistan gas to Turkey via a new pipeline," an Iraqi security official said."
 

jward

passin' thru
EXCLUSIVE Iran struck Iraq target over gas talks involving Israel - officials
By Ahmed Rasheed
and Orhan Coskun

Iran's Revolutionary Guards take responsibility for attack on Erbil - Iran state media

View of a damaged building in the aftermath of missile attacks in Erbil, Iraq March 13, 2022. REUTERS/Azad Lashkari

BAGHDAD/ANKARA, March 28 (Reuters) - A nascent plan for Iraq's Kurdistan region to supply gas to Turkey and Europe - with Israeli help - is part of what angered Iran into striking the Kurdish capital Erbil with ballistic missiles this month, Iraqi and Turkish officials say.
The March 13 attack on Erbil came as a shock to officials throughout the region for its ferocity, and was a rare publicly declared assault by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). read more

The IRGC said the strike hit Israeli "strategic centres" in Erbil and was retaliation for an Israeli air raid that killed two of its members in Syria.
The choice of target, however, baffled many officials and analysts. Most of the 12 missiles hit the villa of a Kurdish businessman involved in the autonomous Kurdistan region's energy sector.
Iraqi and Turkish officials who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity this week said they believe the attack was meant as a multi-pronged message to U.S. allies in the region - but that a key trigger was a plan to pump Kurdish gas into Turkey and Europe, with Israel's involvement. read more

"There had been two recent meetings between Israeli and U.S. energy officials and specialists at the villa to discuss shipping Kurdistan gas to Turkey via a new pipeline," an Iraqi security official said.
Iran's foreign ministry and the IRGC did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
A senior Iranian security official told Reuters the attack was a "multi-purposed message to many people and groups. It's up to them how to interpret it. Whatever (Israel) is planning, from energy sector to agriculture, will not materialise."

Two Turkish officials confirmed that talks involving U.S. and Israeli officials recently took place to discuss Iraq supplying Turkey and Europe with natural gas, but did not say where they took place.
The Iraqi security official and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the plans said the Kurdish businessman whose villa was hit by the Iranian missiles, Baz Karim Barzanji, was working to develop the gas export pipeline.
The disclosure puts Iran's attack on Erbil in the context of regional players' energy interests, rather than a single Israeli military attack on the IRGC, as widely reported.
Israel's foreign ministry said it was not familiar with the matter. Barzanji did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.

The office of Iraqi Kurdish President Nechirvan Barzani denied any meetings with U.S. and Israeli officials to discuss a pipeline took place at Barzanji's villa. The Kurds deny there is any Israeli military or official presence in their territory.
TURKEY-ISRAEL RAPPROCHEMENT
The Iraqi, Turkish and Western sources spoke mostly on condition of anonymity because they are not allowed to give statements to the media.

They said the move comes as a politically sensitive time for Iran and the region: the gas export plan could threaten Iran's place as a major supplier of gas to Iraq and Turkey while its economy is still reeling from international sanctions.
Efforts to revive a nuclear deal between Iran and the West have faltered in recent weeks, casting doubt on prospects for lifting sanctions on Tehran including on its energy sector.
It also comes as Israel, Iran's biggest enemy in the region, and Turkey are strengthening ties and looking at further energy cooperation as sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine threaten severe shortages across Europe.
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said last month that Turkey and Israel can work together to carry Israeli natural gas to Europe. Erdogan also met Barzani and said that Ankara wants to sign a natural gas supply deal with Iraq.
Iraqi and Turkish officials did not give specific details on the plan to pump gas from Iraqi Kurdistan to Turkey, say how far along it was, or what Israel's role is in the project.
"The timing of the attack in Erbil is very interesting. It seems it was more directed at northern Iraq's energy exports and possible cooperation that would include Israel," one of the Turkish officials said.
"Some talks were held for northern Iraq natural gas exports and we know that Iraq, the United States and Israel were involved in this process. Turkey supports this too," the official added.

The Iraqi security official said at least two meetings to discuss the issue, with U.S. and Israeli energy specialists, had taken place at Barzanji's villa, which he said explained the choice of target for Iran's missile strike. No one was seriously hurt in the attack but the villa was severely damaged.
An Iraqi government official and a Western diplomat in Iraq said that Barzanji was known to host foreign officials and businessmen at his home and that they included Israelis.
The Iraqi security official and the former U.S. official said Barzanji's KAR Group company is working to expedite the gas export pipeline. The new pipeline would eventually connect to one that has already been completed on the Turkish side of the border, the former U.S. official said.

KAR Group could not be immediately reached for comment.
KAR Group built and manages the Kurdish region's domestic pipeline, the Kurdistan presidency's chief of staff Fawzi Harir said. It also owns a third of Kurdistan's oil export pipeline under a lease agreement. The rest is owned by Russia's Rosneft.
 

jward

passin' thru






Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

10m

A compelling piece by @7yhy for @Jerusalem_Post. In confirmation hearings, Biden nominees recognized it wasn't 2015 anymore. But the administration's actions--namely the same #Iran JCPOA policy--speak louder than the words. Lessons have not been learned.


America is dismantling the pillars of its own empire - Saudi editor to 'Post'
Ex-editor of Al Arabiya English writes that America is failing the region and siding with Iran while dismantling the last 70 years of regional order.
By MOHAMMED ALYAHYA
Published: MARCH 28, 2022 09:07

Updated: MARCH 28, 2022 16:28
Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger
A military vehicle carrying Iranian Zoobin smart bomb (L) and Sagheb missile under pictures of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) and Late Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during a parade to commemorate the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88), in Tehran September 22, 2011. (photo credit: REUTERS/STRINGER)

A military vehicle carrying Iranian Zoobin smart bomb (L) and Sagheb missile under pictures of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) and Late Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during a parade to commemorate the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88), in Tehran September 22, 2011.
(photo credit: REUTERS/STRINGER)



The Saudi-US relationship is in the throes of a crisis. As a Saudi who went to college in the US, loves America and wants to see it strong, I am increasingly disturbed by the unreality of the American discussion about the subject, which often fails to acknowledge just how deep and serious the rift has grown.

A more realistic discussion should focus on one word: “Divorce.” When President Barack Obama negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran, we Saudis understood him to be seeking the breakup of a 70-year marriage.

How could we not? After all, the flaws in the deal are well known. It paves a path for Iran to a nuclear bomb. It fills the war chest of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has spread militias across the Arab world armed with precision-guided munitions to maim and kill people who formerly looked to America to help guarantee their safety.




 Smoke billows from a Saudi Aramco's petroleum storage facility after an attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia March 26, 2022. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)
Smoke billows from a Saudi Aramco's petroleum storage facility after an attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia March 26, 2022. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)

This past weekend, Secretary of State Antony Blinken joined a conference in the Negev, hosted by Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and attended by a number of Arab foreign ministers. Blinken used this occasion to paper over the rift that the nuclear deal has created by presenting an image of regional solidarity, but the region is not deceived.

Sold disingenuously to the American public as an arms control agreement, the deal is an assault on the regional order that the United States established in the aftermath of World War II. Explicitly hostile to Saudi Arabia, to say nothing of America’s other greatest ally in the region, Israel, the deal replaces the former American-led regional security structure with a concert system in which Iran, backed by Russia and China, becomes America’s new subcontractor while America’s former allies—the Gulf States and Israel— are demoted to second-tier status.

Most importantly, to its authors, the deal takes the United States out of the business of containing Iran, which in response has further ramped up its attacks on regional peace and stability.

Last Friday, as Blinken prepared for his trip to at David Ben Gurion’s old kibbutz of Sde Boker, the Iranian-backed Houthi militia launched a rocket attack against Aramco in Jeddah. This attack was only the latest in a long series of brazen attacks that Iran has conducted, either directly from its own soil or indirectly through proxies.


During the Obama and Biden administrations, Iran’s aggressions have been met with American calls for “de-escalation” and frequent blaming of the Kingdom for a conflict we did not seek with terrorists on our borders backed by Iran — a foreign power which the Biden administration is promising to enrich with hundreds of billions of dollars in sanctions relief. Russia will also get a cut, which will no doubt go towards funding its war in Ukraine.

It was not that long ago that the United States presented itself to its allies as their shield against all actors who sought regional hegemony. The watchword of the alliance was collective defense.

The pretense of “balance” put forward by Obama to justify the deal never made much rational sense. After all, if a friend promises to “balance” your needs with the needs of your enemies, it seems fair to conclude that he is no longer very interested in being your friend.

Instead of friendship, America seems more inclined to use its old friends as human shields for Iran. Earlier this month, when Iran conducted a ballistic missile strike near the US consulate in Erbil, Iraq, it falsely claimed to be targeting an Israeli facility. A senior Biden official then confirmed the Iranian claim. While other officials later denied it, the damage was done. An American official had assisted Iran in getting the most out of its propaganda by action.

 Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at a joint press release, March 27, 2022.  (credit: KOBI GIDEON/GPO)
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at a joint press release, March 27, 2022. (credit: KOBI GIDEON/GPO)

For Arab states in the region, and especially for Saudi Arabia, this weird spectacle was an edifying one. If the Americans won’t side with Israel against Iran, what’s the chance they will side with us?

These days, the United States depicts military deterrence against Iran as a slippery slope to war—on behalf of “ungrateful allies.” While this attitude is most prevalent among Democrats, President Donald Trump also failed to help Riyadh deter Iran after the attack on the Abqaiq refinery in September of 2019. Combined with his statements of intention to leave the Middle East, this abandonment of deterrence made Saudis wonder if the Republicans, too, weren’t aiming for a divorce.


But it is the Biden administration’s determination to resurrect the Iran nuclear deal that has most convinced Saudis that America is determined to dismantle the regional order that it created, no matter what demons it may unleash.

Seemingly nothing will deflect the White House from its goal. During the negotiations in Vienna, attacks from Iran have grown ever more brazen. Not even an attack by Iranian proxies on American forces in the Tanf region of Syria and repeated attacks on the American embassy in Iraq have deflected Biden from his goal of delivering hundreds of billions of dollars to the IRGC.

The incoherence of this policy is stunning, as is the scale of the human and economic destruction it has already caused over the course of the past decade.

In Riyadh, it is not forgotten that the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014 was followed swiftly by the rise of a Russian-Iranian alliance in Syria that leveled most of the major cities of that country and awarded Moscow with a military base on the Eastern Mediterranean – cementing Russia’s first foothold in the Middle East since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

When the Saudis protested Obama’s passivity, he told them they must “learn to share the region with Iran.” And it is not lost on America’s regional allies now that, even as Biden asks Saudi Arabia to raise oil production to help support the campaign against Russia over Ukraine, he is granting sanctions waivers to Russia so that it can continue to guarantee the nuclear deal with Iran that it helped broker — in part by husbanding Iran’s uranium reserves and protecting its underground nuclear facilities filled with illegal centrifuges spinning material for weapons.

Why should America’s regional allies help Washington contain Russia in Europe when Washington is strengthening Russia and Iran in the Middle East?

The guiding American assumption here, if there is one, is that the country’s old regional allies have little choice but to eat whatever is served to us for breakfast, and to eat it again for lunch. This assumption is arrogant and false.

While American policy is beset by baffling contradictions, Chinese policy is simple and straightforward. Beijing is offering Riyadh a simple deal: Sell us your oil and choose whatever military equipment you want from our catalogue; in return, help us to stabilize global energy markets. In other words, the Chinese are offering what increasingly appears modeled on the American-Saudi deal that stabilized the Middle East for 70 years.

What is not yet clear is whether the Chinese can be helpful in deterring Iran, or whether they share the American belief in “balance.” But Xi Jinping will visit Riyadh in May. It is a certainty that Saudi leaders will ask him if Iran’s rocketing of the oil facilities of the world’s most reliable oil producer is in the interest of China and, if not, can Beijing make stop?

The writer is a fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington D.C. and the former Editor in Chief of Al Arabiya English.


 

jward

passin' thru
Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

38m

"Israeli officials said Bennett told Blinken that #Iran can be deterred from moving toward enriching uranium to the military level of 90% if it knows that the U.S. and European countries would ramp up sanctions to the level they've placed on #Russia." "Lapid's Egyptian, Moroccan, Emirati and Bahraini counterparts raised concerns about the nuclear deal and its regional consequences, stressing they are against the Biden administration removing the IRGC from the FTO blacklist, two senior Israeli officials told Axios."
View: https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1509204553773768710?s=20&t=KS_EWazH2z3DqYhRLX_kig
 

jward

passin' thru
Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

7h

Noteworthy gathering after terrorist attack in #Israel: the secretaries-general of #Iran-backed #Hezbollah & Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which both praised it, met to discuss “the latest situations in the Palestinian arena, the development of the jihadist operations..."
"within the territories occupied in 1948, and the operations that took place over the past days."
View: https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1509108672777048069?s=20&t=KS_EWazH2z3DqYhRLX_kig
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment






Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

10m

A compelling piece by @7yhy for @Jerusalem_Post. In confirmation hearings, Biden nominees recognized it wasn't 2015 anymore. But the administration's actions--namely the same #Iran JCPOA policy--speak louder than the words. Lessons have not been learned.


America is dismantling the pillars of its own empire - Saudi editor to 'Post'
Ex-editor of Al Arabiya English writes that America is failing the region and siding with Iran while dismantling the last 70 years of regional order.
By MOHAMMED ALYAHYA
Published: MARCH 28, 2022 09:07

Updated: MARCH 28, 2022 16:28
Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger
A military vehicle carrying Iranian Zoobin smart bomb (L) and Sagheb missile under pictures of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) and Late Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during a parade to commemorate the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88), in Tehran September 22, 2011. (photo credit: REUTERS/STRINGER)'s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) and Late Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during a parade to commemorate the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88), in Tehran September 22, 2011. (photo credit: REUTERS/STRINGER)

A military vehicle carrying Iranian Zoobin smart bomb (L) and Sagheb missile under pictures of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (R) and Late Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during a parade to commemorate the anniversary of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-88), in Tehran September 22, 2011.
(photo credit: REUTERS/STRINGER)



The Saudi-US relationship is in the throes of a crisis. As a Saudi who went to college in the US, loves America and wants to see it strong, I am increasingly disturbed by the unreality of the American discussion about the subject, which often fails to acknowledge just how deep and serious the rift has grown.

A more realistic discussion should focus on one word: “Divorce.” When President Barack Obama negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran, we Saudis understood him to be seeking the breakup of a 70-year marriage.

How could we not? After all, the flaws in the deal are well known. It paves a path for Iran to a nuclear bomb. It fills the war chest of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has spread militias across the Arab world armed with precision-guided munitions to maim and kill people who formerly looked to America to help guarantee their safety.




 Smoke billows from a Saudi Aramco's petroleum storage facility after an attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia March 26, 2022. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)'s petroleum storage facility after an attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia March 26, 2022. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)
Smoke billows from a Saudi Aramco's petroleum storage facility after an attack in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia March 26, 2022. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)

This past weekend, Secretary of State Antony Blinken joined a conference in the Negev, hosted by Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and attended by a number of Arab foreign ministers. Blinken used this occasion to paper over the rift that the nuclear deal has created by presenting an image of regional solidarity, but the region is not deceived.

Sold disingenuously to the American public as an arms control agreement, the deal is an assault on the regional order that the United States established in the aftermath of World War II. Explicitly hostile to Saudi Arabia, to say nothing of America’s other greatest ally in the region, Israel, the deal replaces the former American-led regional security structure with a concert system in which Iran, backed by Russia and China, becomes America’s new subcontractor while America’s former allies—the Gulf States and Israel— are demoted to second-tier status.

Most importantly, to its authors, the deal takes the United States out of the business of containing Iran, which in response has further ramped up its attacks on regional peace and stability.

Last Friday, as Blinken prepared for his trip to at David Ben Gurion’s old kibbutz of Sde Boker, the Iranian-backed Houthi militia launched a rocket attack against Aramco in Jeddah. This attack was only the latest in a long series of brazen attacks that Iran has conducted, either directly from its own soil or indirectly through proxies.


During the Obama and Biden administrations, Iran’s aggressions have been met with American calls for “de-escalation” and frequent blaming of the Kingdom for a conflict we did not seek with terrorists on our borders backed by Iran — a foreign power which the Biden administration is promising to enrich with hundreds of billions of dollars in sanctions relief. Russia will also get a cut, which will no doubt go towards funding its war in Ukraine.

It was not that long ago that the United States presented itself to its allies as their shield against all actors who sought regional hegemony. The watchword of the alliance was collective defense.

The pretense of “balance” put forward by Obama to justify the deal never made much rational sense. After all, if a friend promises to “balance” your needs with the needs of your enemies, it seems fair to conclude that he is no longer very interested in being your friend.

Instead of friendship, America seems more inclined to use its old friends as human shields for Iran. Earlier this month, when Iran conducted a ballistic missile strike near the US consulate in Erbil, Iraq, it falsely claimed to be targeting an Israeli facility. A senior Biden official then confirmed the Iranian claim. While other officials later denied it, the damage was done. An American official had assisted Iran in getting the most out of its propaganda by action.

 Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at a joint press release, March 27, 2022.  (credit: KOBI GIDEON/GPO)
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken at a joint press release, March 27, 2022. (credit: KOBI GIDEON/GPO)

For Arab states in the region, and especially for Saudi Arabia, this weird spectacle was an edifying one. If the Americans won’t side with Israel against Iran, what’s the chance they will side with us?

These days, the United States depicts military deterrence against Iran as a slippery slope to war—on behalf of “ungrateful allies.” While this attitude is most prevalent among Democrats, President Donald Trump also failed to help Riyadh deter Iran after the attack on the Abqaiq refinery in September of 2019. Combined with his statements of intention to leave the Middle East, this abandonment of deterrence made Saudis wonder if the Republicans, too, weren’t aiming for a divorce.


But it is the Biden administration’s determination to resurrect the Iran nuclear deal that has most convinced Saudis that America is determined to dismantle the regional order that it created, no matter what demons it may unleash.

Seemingly nothing will deflect the White House from its goal. During the negotiations in Vienna, attacks from Iran have grown ever more brazen. Not even an attack by Iranian proxies on American forces in the Tanf region of Syria and repeated attacks on the American embassy in Iraq have deflected Biden from his goal of delivering hundreds of billions of dollars to the IRGC.

The incoherence of this policy is stunning, as is the scale of the human and economic destruction it has already caused over the course of the past decade.

In Riyadh, it is not forgotten that the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014 was followed swiftly by the rise of a Russian-Iranian alliance in Syria that leveled most of the major cities of that country and awarded Moscow with a military base on the Eastern Mediterranean – cementing Russia’s first foothold in the Middle East since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

When the Saudis protested Obama’s passivity, he told them they must “learn to share the region with Iran.” And it is not lost on America’s regional allies now that, even as Biden asks Saudi Arabia to raise oil production to help support the campaign against Russia over Ukraine, he is granting sanctions waivers to Russia so that it can continue to guarantee the nuclear deal with Iran that it helped broker — in part by husbanding Iran’s uranium reserves and protecting its underground nuclear facilities filled with illegal centrifuges spinning material for weapons.

Why should America’s regional allies help Washington contain Russia in Europe when Washington is strengthening Russia and Iran in the Middle East?

The guiding American assumption here, if there is one, is that the country’s old regional allies have little choice but to eat whatever is served to us for breakfast, and to eat it again for lunch. This assumption is arrogant and false.

While American policy is beset by baffling contradictions, Chinese policy is simple and straightforward. Beijing is offering Riyadh a simple deal: Sell us your oil and choose whatever military equipment you want from our catalogue; in return, help us to stabilize global energy markets. In other words, the Chinese are offering what increasingly appears modeled on the American-Saudi deal that stabilized the Middle East for 70 years.

What is not yet clear is whether the Chinese can be helpful in deterring Iran, or whether they share the American belief in “balance.” But Xi Jinping will visit Riyadh in May. It is a certainty that Saudi leaders will ask him if Iran’s rocketing of the oil facilities of the world’s most reliable oil producer is in the interest of China and, if not, can Beijing make stop?

The writer is a fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington D.C. and the former Editor in Chief of Al Arabiya English.



Hummm.....
 

jward

passin' thru
Israel Radar
@IsraelRadar_com

1h

Israeli Air Force boosts munitions stockpiles to unprecedented levels, army chief Kochavi says; Air Force engaged in rapid prep for Iran strike readiness, aims to achieve unusually high destruction rate in next war, he says.
 

jward

passin' thru
The Hurdles to the Latest Cease-Fire in Yemen
Apr 5, 2022 | 17:34 GMT

Forces loyal to Yemen's Houthi rebels take part in a military parade in Sanaa on March 31, 2022.

Forces loyal to Yemen's Houthi rebels take part in a military parade in Sanaa on March 31, 2022.
(MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP via Getty Images)

A two-month cease-fire in Yemen faces major hurdles to creating lasting peace, suggesting more fighting in the future, and a low but greater impact risk of escalation beyond Yemen that could widen attacks against Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. On April 2, the United Nations announced that the warring sides in Yemen had agreed to a two-month cease-fire, with agreements to trade prisoners, reopen the Sanaa airport, and allow ships to supply fuel to Houthi-held Hoediah.

Yet despite the truce, violations, especially around the key city of Marib, have already been reported. And unless the Houthis abandon their offensive or the Saudi-led coalition loses the city, it appears this truce will not hold permanently. Instead, the cease-fire is more likely to presage another round of fighting, which will include the potential escalation of the conflict beyond Yemen, as the Houthis may attempt to build leverage over the Saudis...

rest beyond a paywall
 

jward

passin' thru

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm....

Posted for fair use.....

  1. Politics
Apr 25, 2022, 1:00 AM

Six rockets fired at Turkey’s military base in Iraq’s Mosul
Six rockets fired at Turkey’s military base in Iraq’s Mosul

TEHRAN, Apr. 25 (MNA) – News sources on Sunday evening reported that six rockets were fired at a Turkish military base, east of Iraq’s Mosul.

News sources reported that at least six rockets were fired at “Zelikan” base, east of Mosul.

Turkey has long been violating the territorial integrity of northern Iraq by claiming to oppose the PKK.

Turkey has launched several military operations since last April under the pretext of fighting against PKK in northern Iraq and is talking about a possible attack on “Sinjar” region in western Nineveh province.

MA/FNA14010204000974

News Code 186067
Morteza Ahmadi Al Hashem
 

jward

passin' thru
For Tehran, tensions in Jerusalem provide an opportunity to hit back at Israel

Alex Vatanka
Director of Iran Program and Senior Fellow, Frontier Europe Initiative

Alex Vatanka


From Iran’s perspective, the latest eruption of tensions in Jerusalem is a vindication of its uncompromising stance toward Israel. Tehran blames Israel for the violence but its posture is much more about shaping two other key concerns: Iran’s image as a leading defender of Muslim causes and its efforts to erode the momentum for diplomatic recognition of Israel by Muslim countries.

As in previous rounds of tensions between Palestinians and Israelis, Iranian state-run media have been energetically depicting the events in Jerusalem as a contest between David and Goliath. Along the same narrative, Iran is keen to highlight its credentials as the principal Muslim country that defends the rights of the Palestinian people. No one in Iran cares more about this image than the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His customary speech at the end of Ramadan this year will surely be mostly about the Palestinian question and the need for armed “resistance” against the Israelis.

Moreover, for Iran, this is also an opportunity to criticize the Arab states that signed normalization agreements with Israel as part of the Abraham Accords, as well as those Arab and Muslim states that are contemplating following suit. In other words, Iran sees the violence in the Holy Land as a major test and embarrassment for the states that have moved closer to Israel in the last two years.

The recent events are also an opportunity for Iran to move various Palestinian groups closer together under Iranian auspices. Iranian media are already reporting renewed mediation efforts between Hamas and the Fatah movement in a meeting in Lebanon, presumable led by Iran’s top Lebanese ally, Hezbollah. The fact that relations between Hamas and Turkey are now under strain as Ankara has moved to normalize relations with Israel is probably seen as an opportunity by the Iranians as well.

The Iranians are also excited about what they claim to be evidence that more Israeli-Arabs are likely to join the protest movement against Israel. In short, the Iranian narrative is that a major new Intifada is under way and this will make it very hard for Arab states that are close to Israel to defend Israeli actions. Finally, Iranian statements that promise to send weapons to the Palestinians are an explicit warning to the Israelis. Tehran will apply such warnings to pressure the Israelis as part of their ongoing shadow war. After all, Iran and Israel are engaged in a multi-front campaign against each other, and Iran no doubt sees events in Jerusalem and the West Bank as an opportunity to hit back at Israel.

Follow on Twitter: @AlexVatanka
 

jward

passin' thru

Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky

5m

According to @Jerusalem_Post, multiple diplomatic sources in Jerusalem shared the assessment that the U.S. is close to abandoning the revival of the JCPOA in light of #Iran’s demands over the FTO issue.
The chances of the US and Iran returning to the JCPOA are “slim to none,” a senior diplomatic source said, adding that as time passes, the less the likelihood of sealing a deal.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
With nuclear deal unlikely, Israel, US look for alternatives on Iran
The US is close to moving on from the revival of the 2015 JCPOA with Iran, sources in Jerusalem said.
By OMRI NAHMIAS, LAHAV HARKOV
Published: APRIL 26, 2022 07:17

Updated: APRIL 26, 2022 20:39
Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger
PRIME MINISTER Naftali Bennett meets with US President Joe Biden in the Oval Office in August. (photo credit: JONATHAN ERNST/REUTERS)

PRIME MINISTER Naftali Bennett meets with US President Joe Biden in the Oval Office in August.
(photo credit: JONATHAN ERNST/REUTERS)



The US is moving toward ending its efforts to return to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, as Tehran continues to make demands without showing a willingness to consider concessions, Israeli diplomatic sources said on Tuesday.

National Security Adviser Eyal Hulata met with his American counterpart, Jake Sullivan, in Washington this week to discuss alternative ways to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon in the event – which Jerusalem views as likely – that the Iran deal is not revived.

“Sullivan emphasized that the United States is attuned to Israel’s concerns about threats to its security, including, first-and-foremost, from Iran and Iranian-backed proxies,” said a White House statement.




Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s Office did not comment on the meeting.

Multiple diplomatic sources in Jerusalem shared the assessment that the US is close to abandoning the revival of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal in light of Iran’s demand that Washington removes the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from its list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) and its refusal to take reciprocal steps.

European External Action Service (EEAS) Deputy Secretary General Enrique Mora and Iranian Deputy at Ministry of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi wait for the start of talks on reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in Vienna, Austria June 20, 2021. (credit: EU DELEGATION IN VIENNA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
European External Action Service (EEAS) Deputy Secretary General Enrique Mora and Iranian Deputy at Ministry of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi wait for the start of talks on reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal in Vienna, Austria June 20, 2021. (credit: EU DELEGATION IN VIENNA/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
The chances of the US and Iran returning to the JCPOA are “slim to none,” a senior diplomatic source said, adding that as time passes, the less the likelihood of sealing a deal.

Indirect negotiations between the US and Iran to return to the JCPOA, which limited Tehran’s nuclear program in return for the lifting of sanctions, began in early 2021. An agreement was essentially concluded whereby the US would lift nuclear-related sanctions placed by the Trump administration, and Iran would return to compliance with the JCPOA’s restrictions on uranium enrichment and stockpiling.

But in February, Iran began to demand the IRGC’s de-listing from the FTO, which the Biden administration viewed as a non-nuclear issue. As such, it offered various concessions that Iran could make in return that are not related to its nuclear program, such as agreeing not to attack American officials. However, Iran has refused all such offers.


Israel advocated vehemently against the removal of the IRGC from the FTO.

A US official told journalist Laura Rozen that “Israel is not a key factor,” rather the White House and Department of Defense opposed removing IRGC from the FTO list.

Bennett and US President Joe Biden spoke on the phone earlier this week and discussed “the threat posed by Iran and its proxies,” among other matters, according to the White House statement.

Bennett said that he is “sure that President Biden, who is a true friend of Israel and cares about its national security, will not allow the IRGC to be removed from the list of terrorist organizations. Israel has clarified its position on the issue. The IRGC is the largest terrorist organization in the world.”

Sullivan and Hulata discussed “a range of regional and global security issues,” on Monday, with the two agreeing to continue the ongoing coordination through the US-Israel Strategic Consultative Group “and strengthen security and diplomatic cooperation wherever possible with other regional partners.”

The White House also noted, without elaborating, that the two men also discussed Israel’s relationships “with key Indo-Pacific countries.”

Another area of discussion was the ongoing war in Ukraine “and the need to continue supporting our Ukrainian partners.”


The two sides “committed to continue their close coordination on the range of security issues of importance to both the United States and Israel, and they look forward to President Biden’s visit to Israel in the coming months,” the White House said.

The visit was announced without a date after the Biden-Bennett call.

 

jward

passin' thru
reuters.com

Analysis: Exclusive: Rising oil prices buy Iran time in nuclear talks, officials say
May 5, 202211:56 AM CDTLast Updated 16 hours ago

7-8 minutes


  • Summary
  • Crude price surge helps Iran's sanctions-battered economy
  • This may make revived nuclear deal less urgent for Iran
  • But reported strikes, protests point to ongoing hardships
  • Clerical rulers' ultimate aim still seen as reviving deal
DUBAI, May 5 (Reuters) - Emboldened by an oil price surge since Russia invaded Ukraine, Iran's clerical rulers are in no rush to revive a 2015 nuclear pact with world powers to ease sanctions on its energy-reliant economy, three officials familiar with Tehran's thinking said.
Last year, the Islamic Republic engaged in indirect talks with the United States as a route to cancelling U.S. sanctions that have gutted revenues and dramatically worsened economic hardships for ordinary people, stirring discontent.
But the talks have been on hold since March, chiefly over Iran's insistence on Washington removing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Tehran's elite security force, from the U.S. Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list.
While the ultimate aim is still to resurrect the deal and so have sanctions lifted, the Iranian officials said soaring oil prices had opened a window of opportunity for Iran by increasing revenues, giving the economy months of breathing space.
"Our nuclear programme is advancing as planned and time is on our side," said a senior Iranian official, who declined to be named because he was not authorised to discuss sensitive policy issues with the media.
"If the talks fail it will not be the end of the world," said the official, adding that the fact Iran's economy was not now so reliant on a revival of the deal would provide strong leverage for its negotiators if or when the talks resumed.
Iran's foreign ministry, which handles the nuclear talks, and the U.S. state department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Iran's finances came under intense pressure in 2018 when then-U.S. President Donald Trump ditched the nuclear pact between Iran and world powers - approved by his predecessor Barack Obama - and reimposed sanctions that sharply cut the oil revenues that fund a sprawling Iranian state apparatus.
Oil exports from Iran, which sits on the world's fourth-largest reserves of crude, plummeted from a peak of 2.8 million barrels per day in 2018 to as low as 200,000 bpd.
Tehran retaliated a year later by gradually violating the deal's nuclear curbs, from rebuilding stockpiles of enriched uranium, refining it to higher fissile purity and installing advanced centrifuges to speed up output - reducing the time it would need to develop a nuclear bomb, if it so chose.
Tehran says it seeks only peaceful nuclear energy.

Although Iran does not divulge exact figures on oil sales, an Iranian oil official said they were currently around 1.5 million bpd with most going to China at a big discount that Iranian authorities have declined to reveal.
Global oil prices remain high, however, with Brent crude reaching $139 a barrel in March, its highest since 2008 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine exacerbated supply concerns.
The Iranian parliament increased the ceiling of oil and condensates exports from 1.2 million bpd at a price of $60 last year to 1.4 million bpd based on $70 a barrel in the state budget, Iranian state media reported in March.
Tehran's refusal to back down from the FTO assignation demand has raised doubt about whether the nuclear impasse can be resolved. President Joe Biden's administration has made it clear that it has no such plans, while also not ruling it out.
On Wednesday, U.S. State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters that it was unclear whether or not it would be possible to revive the deal and said Washington was now bracing for either outcome. read more
Iranian authorities have publicly shrugged off U.S. pressure, saying Tehran has become adept at working around sanctions as they have been a fact of life for decades.

Jihad Azour, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Middle East and Central Asia Department director, said the Iranian economy had adjusted to sanctions over the last few years.
"And the increase in oil prices and an increase in (Iran's) oil production are constituting an additional, I would say, increase in revenues," Azour told Reuters.
However, Henry Rome, Iran analyst at consultancy group Eurasia, said the Islamic Republic is underestimating the value of easing sanctions and overestimating its ability to muddle through longer term.
"Iranian leaders probably consider stronger domestic economic performance, limited U.S. enforcement of oil sanctions and broader Western distraction given the Ukraine war as reasons not to be desperate to secure a deal," Rome said.
"Although, they likely remain open to a deal at the right price."
Despite the recent rise in revenues, sanctions continue to have a major impact on daily life in Iran, meaning that everyone from the business elite to lower-income families face soaring inflation, a sinking currency and rising joblessness.
Clerical rulers may therefore be wary of simmering disenchantment at home, according to a former Iranian government official.

Ultimately, they prefer an end to sanctions, fearing a return of unrest among lower-income Iranians whose periodic protests in recent years have reminded leaders how vulnerable they can be to grassroots anger over economic hardship.
Not enough people are yet feeling the benefits of rising oil revenues, the former government official added.
Iranian analyst Saeed Leylaz said Iran's home-grown economic problems, including mismanagement and corruption that deplete revenue needed for investment, job creation and development, pose a bigger challenge to the establishment than sanctions.
The official inflation rate is around 40% while some people estimate it at over 50%. Almost half of Iran's 82 million population are now below the poverty line. Unofficial estimates suggest unemployment is well above the official rate of 11%.

"All the economic indicators point to worsening economic realities in Iran. To say Iran sits on a tinderbox is no exaggeration," said Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at Middle East Institute.
Prices of basic goods like bread, meat and rice are increasing daily. Iranian media frequently report layoffs and strikes by workers who have not been paid for months, including in government-owned factories.
Owning a home in Tehran is impossible for many. Prices have risen in recent months by around 50% in some areas. The currency has dropped over 70% against the U.S. dollar since 2018.
"Where is this oil revenue going? Why we do not feel any improvement?" said teacher Mohsen Sedighi, a father-of-two in Tehran.

Writing by Parisa Hafezi; Additional reporting by Arshad Mohammed in Washington; Editing by Mike Collett-White and Mark Heinrich
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
 

jward

passin' thru
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and the Rising Cult of Mahdism: Missiles and Militias for the Apocalypse
May 3, 2022
Saeid Golkar, Kasra Aarabi


Summary



As the U.S. administration considers whether to remove Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization, understanding its nature, development, and ideology is essential to making an informed decision. There is much about it that differentiates it from a conventional armed force. One fundamental aspect of its ideology that until now has been overlooked is the doctrine of Mahdism.




Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
The Development of the IRGC: From Militia to Parallel State
Ideology & Indoctrination: Manufacturing a More Radical Generation
IRGC Ideological Worldview
What is Mahdism?
Quietist Shi’a Political Doctrine: From the Safavids to the Pahlavis
Iran’s Islamic Revolution: Preparing for Mahdi’s Return
Khamenei and the Mahdism Doctrine
Ahmadinejad: The “Government of Mahdi”
The Emergence of the Cult of Mahdi
The IRGC and Mahdism
Mahdism and the Eradication of Israel
The IRGC’s “War Footing” to Prepare to Aid Mahdi’s Army
Conclusion


 

jward

passin' thru
Saudi Arabia flexing its geopolitical oil power

US likely pressing new oil-for-security arrangement while Riyadh talks to China about selling barrels in yuan rather than bucks
by MK Bhadrakumar May 8, 2022

017_233471.jpg

Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is playing both sides of the US-China divide. Photo: AFP / EyePress News
Some three weeks after the reported meeting of the director of the US Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns, with the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, the OPEC+ ministerial held a videoconference on Thursday.
The OPEC+ meet drew satisfaction that “continuing oil-market fundamentals and the consensus on the outlook pointed to a balanced market.”
The press release issued in Vienna says the ministerial “further noted the continuing effects of geopolitical factors and issues related to the ongoing pandemic” and decided that OPEC+ will stick to the monthly production adjustment mechanism agreed in July last year “to adjust upward the monthly overall production by 0.432 million barrels/day for the month of June 2022.”

According to the former publisher of The Wall Street Journal, Karen Elliott House, Burns went to Saudi Arabia for a “mating dance” with Prince Mohammed – namely, the prince must cooperate on a new oil-for-security strategy to “increase production to save European nations from energy shortages.”
Burns’ visit to the kingdom took place just ahead of the fifth round of Saudi-Iranian normalization talks in Baghdad between the Saudi intelligence chief and the deputy head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who was acting as mediator and attended the latest round of talks, told state media, “Our brothers in Saudi Arabia and Iran approach the dialogue with a big responsibility as demanded by the current regional situation. We are convinced that reconciliation is near.”
Nournews, affiliated to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, also reported on April 24 that the fifth round of talks on a possible détente was “constructive” and the negotiators managed “to draw a clearer picture” of how to resume bilateral relations, and, “given the constructive bilateral dialogue so far, there is a possibility of a meeting between the Iranian and Saudi top diplomats in the near future.”
Burns’ mission couldn’t have been indifferent toward the Saudis’ reconciliation track with Tehran. With the outcome of the talks in Vienna on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) uncertain, Iran’s close ties with Russia and China remain a major worry for Washington.

Russia-Iran-Vladimir-Putin-Ebrahim-Raisi.jpg

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian leader Ebrahim Raisi could draw closer together depending on the outcome of the JCPOA talks. Image: Twitter
And with Tehran’s stubborn refusal to trim its regional policies to suit US regional strategies, Washington has fallen back on the default option to resuscitate the anti-Iran front of its regional allies. The US hopes that Saudi Arabia will come on board the Abraham Accords.
Meanwhile, the issue of oil prices has returned to center stage. Indeed, high oil prices mean high income for Russia. Russia’s sales of oil and natural gas far exceeded initial forecasts for 2021 as a result of skyrocketing prices, accounting for 36% of the country’s total budget. The revenues exceeded initial plans by 51.3%, totaling US$119 billion.
The US administration’s best-laid plans to cripple the Russian economy are unraveling. Equally, the high oil price is also a domestic issue for President Joe Biden. Above all, unless Europe finds other oil sources, it will continue buying Russian oil.
However, Prince Mohammed has a different agenda. He is likely to rule Saudi Arabia for many decades – half a century if he lives to 86, his father’s age. And the prince has been remarkably successful in creating a “power base.”
His lifestyle changes have been a smashing hit with Saudis 35 and under – 70% of the kingdom’s citizens – and his ambition to transform Saudi Arabia into a modern technological leader ignites the imagination of youth.

Clearly, his refusal to punish Russia and his gesture to place the princely amount of $2 billion in a new, untested investment fund started by former US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner speak for themselves. Prince Mohammed would have his own reasons too, starting with Biden’s contemptuous reference to Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” state and refusal to deal in person.
The prince hit back recently by declining to take a call from Joe Biden. Besides, the United States’ restrictions on arms sales, insufficient response to attacks on Saudi Arabia by Houthi forces, publication of a report into the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi – all these are in play here.
Even if the administration is able to get congressional approval for new security guarantees for Saudi Arabia (which is rather problematic), Prince Mohammad may not be swayed, since at the end of the day high oil prices boost the Saudi budget, too.
The paradox is both Saudi Arabia and Russia are stakeholders in OPEC+, as is evident from the explicit warning to the European Union by Mohammad Barkindo, OPEC’s secretary-general, last month that it would be impossible to replace more than 7 million barrels per day of Russian oil and other liquid exports potentially lost because of current or future sanctions or voluntary actions.
In such a torrential stream where crosscurrents are foaming and weltering, what probably unnerves the Biden administration most could be the talk that Chinese President Xi Jinping may be planning to visit Saudi Arabia, amid persistent reports recently that Riyadh and Beijing are in talks to price some of the Gulf nation’s oil sales in yuan rather than dollars, which would indeed mark a profound shift for the oil market and help advance China’s efforts to persuade more countries and international investors to transact in its currency.

China-Saudi-Arabia-Oil-Yuan-Twitter-e1569320793732.jpg

Conceptual image of Chinese yuan and oil wells. Photo: Twitter
The Saudi explanation for the shift to the yuan is that Riyadh could use part of new currency revenues to pay Chinese contractors involved in mega-projects within the kingdom domestically, which would reduce the risks associated with the capital controls Beijing imposes on its currency.
But for Washington, that means certain sensitive Saudi-China transactions in yuan will not appear in the rearview mirror of the SWIFT messaging infrastructure, making transaction monitoring unviable.

There are persistent US reports that with Chinese support, Saudi Arabia may be constructing a new uranium processing facility near Al-Ula to enhance its pursuit of nuclear technology. Saudi Arabia’s generous $8 billion in financial support for Pakistan, unveiled this weekend, will almost certainly raise hiccups in Washington.
Saudi Arabia is a central pillar of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and ranks in the top three countries for Chinese construction projects, according to the China Global Investment Tracker, run by the American Enterprise Institute. Suffice to say, the CIA chief’s call could not have been for a friendly chat with Prince Mohammed.

 
Top