GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment
The Only Way These Globalists See to Achieve Net Zero Is to Destroy the Food Supply: Alexandra Marshall 1:56 min

The Only Way These Globalists See to Achieve Net Zero Is to Destroy the Food Supply: Alexandra Marshall
Red Voice Media Published July 28, 2022

"There's only one way to achieve Net Zero, according to these people, and that's to basically destroy your agricultural industry. Not to shut down transport, not to maybe rein in the sprawl of cities, but to destroy the food production of the country.

And that's going to be very nifty when there's a surprise famine in the world. They can claim it's because of climate change and give themselves yet more power. So whether or not they screw up a country, they still win in some way, and this is not good for people."

Source: Editor of The Spectator Australia Alexandra Marshall on Trudeau's fertilizer ban
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

There Won't Be Any Winners Because The Status Quo Is Corrupt Everywhere

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 02:13 PM
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

Systemic corruption on this vast scale optimizes failure and collapse.



Debating which nations will "win" as the global economy unravels is a popular but pointless parlor game. Since the status quo in every nation is deeply, profoundly, systemically corrupt, there won't be any "winners," there will only be losers.

Apologists love to say that corruption has always come hand-in-hand with power, and this is superficially true. Once a centralized hierarchy takes power, those seeking self-glorification and wealth seek power as a means to their self-enrichment and glorification.

Naturally, they use their power to reward those who helped them gain power and those helping them maintain power. So a small Texas contractor who contributed to Lyndon Johnson's political career was awarded immense contracts to build bases in Vietnam during Johnson's vast expansion of the Vietnam War. It's just business, right?

But this naive, superficial normalization of corruption ignores the consequential difference between two types of corruption. One kind is directing cushy positions and contracts to cronies: well-paid positions on boards are given to pals, fat contracts are awarded to political allies, and so on. The point here is that somebody was going to get the cushy position and the fat contract anyway, and so the corruption is in who gets the gravy.

This level of corruption has a systemic cost. Bribes paid to secure contracts and subsidies act as a "tax" on the economy, as the bribes add expense but do not deliver any improvement in quality or quantity. When the most qualified candidate or firm is passed over to favor an unqualified crony or ally, the loss in effectiveness is consequential, though more difficult to measure.

The systemically destructive type of corruption is on a completely different level. Systemic corruption deforms the core economic functions of governance and capital to enrich insiders at the expense of the national interest and the common good.

When corruption hollows out a nation's military capabilities, that undermines national security. When shoddily built equipment is stripped of valuable parts (to be sold on the black market) to the point it's no longer of any military value, corruption has a cost that is incalculable until it's too late to repair the rot. When armament contracts are given to build inferior weapons systems to benefit cronies, corruption has optimized losing the next war.

When corruption is the deciding factor in distributing the nation's capital, that mal-investment of irreplaceable resources in unproductive projects fatally undermines the entire economy. When corruption funnels national resources into poorly built bridges to nowhere ghost cities and monuments to excess, there are opportunity costs that can never be recovered, for all that capital and labor could have been invested productively.

Corruption becomes fatal when those in power are no longer able to distinguish the difference between self-interest and the national interest. Systemic corruption blurs the lines and persuades those in power that their self-enrichment and power grabs are serving the national interest.

The truth is their distorting the system to maximize their private gain cannot possibly serve the national interest or the common good. It's one thing to reward a long-serving crony by appointing the pal to a cushy no-real-work-required position on a crony-filled board with little actual power. It's another to distort the distribution of irreplaceable capital and resources to maximize the self-enrichment of the corrupt few as the expense of the many.

Systemic corruption on this vast scale optimizes failure and collapse.
In my book Global Crisis, National Renewal, I argue that the only nations that will survive the transition from a waste is growth economy will be those which embrace Degrowth. We can also say that only those nations which succeed in limiting systemic corruption will have the means to invest their nation's dwindling resources productively.

Since no nation is exhibiting any consequential interest in either Degrowth or eradicating systemic corruption, there will be no "winners", there will only be losers. While the status quo careens into decay and collapse, at least we can enrich ourselves by chasing the Pelosi Portfolio.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Fall Of Gasoline Demand Has Been Grossly Exaggerated

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 12:40 PM
Gas prices soar -> demand falls.
Gas prices tumble -> demand rebounds.


Basic econ, right? Sure enough, we have now seen 7 consecutive weeks of declining gas prices - the longest stretch since the covid crash - and with a gallon of gas down almost a dollar from its all time high just north of $5 at the end of June to 4.27 currently, one would expect hat gasoline demand is once again rising.



One would be right: as Bloomberg notes, falling pump prices are starting to entice drivers back to America’s roadways after what was recently seen as a steep decline in motorists to start the summer.

As shown in the next chart, gasoline demand jumped by 8.5% for the week ended July 22 after spending the first half of of the month below 2020 levels for the same period, the latest EIA data show. That came as retail prices posted their biggest weekly drop since 2008, according to auto club AAA.



But taking a step back, did gasoline demand really fall in the past few weeks, or is that just an artifact of some faulty model? Well, according to an eponymously titled note from BofA energy strategist Doug Legate (available to pro subs in the usual place), the "fall of gasoline demand appears grossly exaggerated."

As Legate writes, "the narrative around collapsing demand in response to high gasoline prices amidst recessionary concerns is too perfect a scenario on too fast of a timeline to not demand some examination."

Clearly eager to perform said "examination," Legate then notes that this week we finally got the post July 4th rebound we suggested could follow the 4th of July holiday. "For the week ending July 22nd, implied gasoline demand rebounded to 9.2 million b/d - a 1 million b/d increase vs the last two week average, and the second highest level of 2022."



This is important because on a four-week moving average basis, the trend line has resumed higher. And while demand remains below 2019, that is the trade-off between a post-COVID recovery and some inevitable sensitivity to high gasoline prices - albeit well off recent peak summer highs.

As such the BofA strategist concludes that he sees "concerns over some inevitable demand collapse akin to 2008/09 as significantly over done - but mainly from the supply side noting some 1mmbpd of refining capacity shuttered in the US increasing domestic dependency on imports that we continue to believe support above normal crack spreads for US refiner anchored on European natural gas prices: with Dutch TTF now >$60 / MMBTU or >$50 / MMBTU above US Henry Hub benchmarks US refiners have a cost advantage of ~$15/bbl, which on the current forward curve holds through the end of the year."

The bottom line, according to Legate is that evidence of material demand destruction that was somehow confirmed by the last two weeks EIA data, is not obvious - at least not at the depths suggested by the data.

That gasoline demand in particular has rebounded this week, the strategist concludes, "leads us to suggest 'rumors of the death of gasoline have been greatly exaggerated'. With refining earnings due to kick off with VLO and PBF on July 28th, we will get the first glimpse of demand trends from the proverbial coal face - and a refining margin outlook that we see structurally reset by an advantaged US cost of supply and US refining closures - not transitory or seasonal gasoline demand trends."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Plunging US Oil Inventories Imply Deeper Slowdown Will Be Needed

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 12:00 PM
By John Kemp, senior market analyst at Reuters

U.S. petroleum inventories are not rebuilding – despite record releases from the government’s strategic reserve and a slowdown in the economy which is weighing on fuel consumption by manufacturers and freight firms.



In the short term, pressure on inventories is bullish for oil prices. In the medium term, however, it implies a deeper and longer cyclical downturn will be needed later in 2022 and early 2023 to rebalance the market.

Total stocks, including the strategic petroleum reserve, have fallen in 80 of the last 108 weeks by a total of 438 million barrels since the start of July 2020, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).



As a result, combined stocks of crude and refined products are at their lowest for the time of year since prices spiked to record highs in 2008 and before that 2004 (“Weekly petroleum status report”, EIA, July 27).

Inventories have been broadly stable over the last 8-10 weeks, which implies production and consumption have moved closer to balance, after a long period of significant under-production lasting almost two years, but there has been no sign of them starting to rebuild to more comfortable levels.

In the most recent week, petroleum inventories depleted by 9 million barrels, with drawdowns in strategic crude reserves (-6 million), commercial crude (-5 million), gasoline (-3 million) and distillate fuel oil (-1 million), partially offset by builds in propane (+3 million) and other oils (+3 million).

Distillate fuel oil remains the tightest part of the market...



... with inventories at the lowest for the time of year since 2000, and before that 1996, and they show no signs of increasing.



Distillate stocks usually increase in the third quarter as refineries produce more diesel and heating oil as a by-product of processing more crude to meet summer driving season demand for gasoline.



But stocks have risen by less than 1 million barrels so far this quarter, one of the smallest increases in the last 40 years, pointing to a persistent shortage, which is unsustainable.

Stocks have risen by around 400,000 barrels since the end of June compared with an average pre-pandemic seasonal increase of 5.5 million barrels in the ten years between 2010 and 2019.

Distillate consumption is the most sensitive part of the fuel market to changes in the manufacturing and freight cycle.



Both manufacturing activity and freight have decelerated since the start of the year, easing some distillate demand and helping stabilise inventories.

But the extremely low level of inventories and their failure to rebuild implies a much deeper and longer economic slowdown will now be required to allow crude and especially fuel stocks to recover.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Walmart Margin Signal Is Warning For Markets

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 11:04 AM
By Emily Graffeo, Bloomberg reporter and analyst

With Walmart Inc. driving home that consumers are retrenching in the face of soaring inflation and rising borrowing costs, investors are grappling with the risk that Wall Street’s expectations for US corporate profits are still too high.

Stock markets have shed trillions this year and a recession may be looming. Yet one key driver of equity valuations still shows analysts foresee earnings resilience, at least by historical norms. Projections for S&P 500 Index profit margins for the third quarter stand at 13.5%, versus the pre-pandemic quarterly average of 10.5%, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data going back to 2010.

But Walmart’s move to lower its profit outlook this week as it cuts prices to pare inventories is a warning sign for profit expectations broadly, says Nick Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research.

If the world’s largest retailer can’t maintain margins in the face of high inflation and cooling economic growth, it’s an ominous sign for others in that sector, he says.



Walmart is “facing a stressed consumer, with worries about inflation, who is not buying as many discretionary items that have higher margins, and they overstocked on those things that now aren’t selling, and have to discount them, hence the margin erosion,” Colas said in an interview.

Earnings releases ahead from other retailers, including Amazon.com Inc. on Thursday after the close, will help investors and analysts decide whether Walmart’s margin warning is company-specific or a harbinger of more widespread pain that could spell deeper losses in stocks.

On Wednesday at least, the mood was buoyant. Stocks surged after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank will slow the pace of rate hikes at some point. He spoke after officials lifted their benchmark rate by 75 basis points for the second straight month.

Bloomberg Intelligence’s Poonam Goyal, for one, says Walmart’s profit cut likely won’t bleed over to Amazon.com. The latter’s customer base is more affluent, and better-positioned to navigate inflationary challenges that have forced consumers to shift spending to low-margin food items, from higher-margin discretionary purchases, the analyst said in a report.

Since Walmart lowered its profit outlook on Monday, a series of earnings reports have eased the gloom around the strength of the consumer, including from Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc., hotel chain Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Visa Inc.

It’s also worth noting that analysts’ expectations for the third quarter have already been declining in recent months as angst grows about a possible recession, according to BI strategist Michael Casper.


Source: Bloomberg Intelligence

Colas says elevated profit-margin expectations have been a key driver of equity valuations in recent years, helping keep the S&P 500 above pre-pandemic levels. Now those assumptions are being questioned.

“We are coming off a period of exceptional S&P 500 profitability,” he wrote in a note this week.

“Analysts and investors may be anchoring their margin expectations on unsustainably high 2021 profit margins.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

July New Vehicle Retail Sales Expected To Crash 10.8%

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 10:45 AM

It sure looks like the recession that the White House continues to claim doesn't exist is hitting the auto market. At least according to new projections by J.D. Power, who this week released their estimates and analysis for July 2022.

A joint forecast from J.D. Power and LMC Automotive predicts that "retail sales of new vehicles this month are expected to reach 988,400 units, a 10.8% decrease compared with July 2021 when adjusted for selling days".

Without adjusting for for the one less selling day in July 2022, the plunge would have been 14.1%.

Total new vehicle sales for the month, including non-retail sales, also are expected to plunge to 1,159,700 units, a 5.7% decrease from July 2021, the release sales. Ex-the selling day adjustment, the fall would have been 9.2%.



“July is yet another month where supply constraints keep vehicle sales artificially low but deliver record transaction prices and dealer profitability. July 2022 is on track to be the ninth consecutive month that retail inventory closes below 900,000 units as anticipated improvements in vehicle production volumes fail to materialize," , said Thomas King, president of the data and analytics division at J.D. Power.

He continued: "The industry sales pace is simply a function of the number of vehicles being delivered to dealers each month, with a large portion of those vehicles being sold before they arrive at the dealership. This month, 55% of vehicles will be sold within 10 days of arriving at a dealership, while the average number of days a new vehicle is in a dealer’s possession before being sold is on pace to be 19 days—down from 29 days a year ago."

He also noted that new vehicle prices remain near record highs, despite sales beginning to wane: “For July, new-vehicle prices continue to hover near record levels, with the average transaction price expected to reach $45,869—a 12.3% increase from a year ago—the second highest on record.



“Consequently, even though the sales pace is down 10.8% year over year, consumers will still spend nearly $45.3 billion on new vehicles this month, the second-highest level ever for the month of July but slightly down 3.5% from July 2021 due to the reduced sales volume.
He also noted that discounts and incentives at dealers are continuing to dry up due to the lack of inventory:
“Unsurprisingly, the lack of inventory is leading to even smaller discounts from manufacturers. The average incentive spend per vehicle is tracking toward $894, a decrease of 54.7% from a year ago. This will mark the third consecutive month under $1,000 and the first time under $900. Incentive spending per vehicle expressed as a percentage of the average vehicle MSRP is trending toward a record low of 1.9%, down 2.7 percentage points from July 2021 and the first time below 2.0%. One of the factors contributing to the reduction in incentive spending is the absence of discounts on vehicles that are leased. This month, leasing will account for just 17% of retail sales. In July 2019, leases accounted for 29% of all new-vehicle retail sales.”
We are keeping our eyes on inventories, which will be the next shoe to drop for the industry once demand tapers further and supply chain bottlenecks ease slightly in 2H 2022.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
13:01 min

The Government is Making You a Slave to the State (Steve Gruber)
Americas Voice Live Show Published July 28, 2022

The Government is using the inflation crisis....and the so-called “climate crisis” to give themselves more power over you. It’s time we took a stand.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Climate protestors attempt to interrupt Congressional baseball game in DC .57 min

Climate protestors attempt to interrupt Congressional baseball game in DC
The Post Millennial Clips Published July 28, 2022

LIVE in DC: The current scene outside the Congressional baseball game, where climate protestors have vowed to interrupt the game

^^^^
(Note pre-printed signs - an indicator of a "professionally organized" protest. Remember, Soros funds Gretta Thunberg and the European protests. It was interesting to note on one of the recent Crossroads programs, that the Dutch moves on the farmers came about from environmental groups suing the Dutch government to force them into implementing a treaty agreement they had made. This is a common tactic of these groups. )

80848305_3406507616042671_7084155337611149312_n.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Canada)

PETITION: Stop the War on Farmers! 4:14 min

PETITION: Stop the War on Farmers!
Rebel News Published July 28, 2022

www.StopTheWarOnFarmers.com

^^^^

PETITION: Stop the War on Farmers!
The green war on farming is a war on humanity. It’s a genocidal ideology. If you agree with me that the war on farmers must end, sign our petition to stop the war on farmers.
Unlike so many journalists in the mainstream media, I am a farmer, So I know a thing or two.
There is a war on farming, and it is a global war. It’s a war on human health, human
development, and society, and the people waging this war see neolithic, pre-farming humanity, filled with violence, suffering, short lives, scarcity, and illness, as the low carbon net-zero goal, the ideal and not just a stepping stone to who and what we are now.

Humanity, all 9 billion of us need food, and an abundance of food. And farmers do a good job of producing it and keeping us from starvation, malnutrition, and death. No farmers, no food. Some people know this. But the green movement has other plans that seem genocidal at face value.

And governments, so frequently infected by the UN and the World Economic Forum’s anti-humanity agendas, are often the sharp end of the spear in the war on productive modern agriculture.

Last month the Liberals tried to label nutritious, healthy, locally grown Canadian beef as dangerous to your health but pushback from the public put a stop to that. And maybe pressure might do the same again and save farmers from the next unscientific attack on their work to feed the world and keep city people from dying of starvation in a concrete wasteland.

We have seen a farmer uprising in the Netherlands as the Dutch PM Mark Rutte is imposing nitrogen emissions targets that could force farmers off the land, cull livestock, and will limit fertilizer use that will shrink yields, harm farmers financially, and cause even worse food inflation at the grocery store for consumers.

And in Sri Lanka, farmers were forced to move to fully organic farming, and the yields collapsed, food is scarce, farmers are broke, and people are rioting.

Wars are fought and civilizations have fallen over food and resources.

And even after seeing this, Prime Minister Trudeau, who is clearly not a smart man, is introducing the same nitrogen targets for Canadian farmers, who are already being hammered by carbon taxes, inflation, and supply chain issues. And you should care because if you eat, you are involved.

Net-zero climate policies are waging war against farmers and consumers. It’s a war for the future. Will you eat what you are meant to, or the bugs because the World Economic Forum told you to?

Will you stand with farmers as they resist these apocalyptic policies? I know I will. Ask yourself why the people in charge want you malnourished, weak and unable to think?

If you agree that the government and global elite's war on farmers must end, sign the petition at www.StopTheWarOnFarmers.com
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(COMMENT: I admit to previously being a chem-trails skeptic. But I am increasingly open to the belief that China or the cabal or whatever is engaging in weather warfare - particularly drought in the weaUS. This is an old clip. Somewhere in this thread are a series of posts, including a infomentary from Catherine Austin-Fitts on weather modification.)

The Climate Change hoax is a guise for the cabal to be able to justify weather modification 1:02 min

The Climate Change hoax is a guise for the cabal to be able to justify weather modification
SettingBrushfires Published July 28, 2022
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Mayors across the globe join forces to 'take urgent action to confront the climate crisis' 16:48 min

Mayors across the globe join forces to 'take urgent action to confront the climate crisis'
Rebel News Published July 28, 2022

Rebel News' David Menzies discusses a global program called 'C40 Cities,' which aims to unite mayors from major cities worldwide in an effort to combat climate change and drastically transform society.

^^^^^

Mayors across the globe join forces to 'take urgent action to confront the climate crisis'
Rebel News' David Menzies discusses a global program called 'C40 Cities,' which aims to unite mayors from major cities worldwide in an effort to combat climate change and drastically transform society.
  • By Rebel News
  • July 28, 2022
On last night's episode of the Ezra Levant Show, guest host David Menzies discussed a program called "C40 Cities," which is essentially a global network of mayors from close to 100 cities worldwide who have committed to delivering the "urgent action needed right now to confront the climate crisis."

1659059409662.png

It remains to be seen exactly what kind of "urgent action" will need to be implemented in order to sufficiently confront the climate crisis to the mayors' preferences. However, judging from "C40's" own website, removing meat from peoples' diets and focusing on "sustainable" food solutions such as bugs appears to be one of the focal points.

Toronto Mayor John Tory is a member of this group, whose publicly stated mission is to "halve the emissions of its member cities within a decade, while improving equity, building resilience, and creating the conditions for everyone, everywhere to thrive."
As stated by David Menzies, "With the C40 group of 96 mayors, they have clearly signed on to that nefarious agenda of 'Building Back Better.' Yet, do they even practice what they preach? The next C40 World Mayor's Summit is scheduled for this October in Buenos Aires. Do you think for one second that Mayor John Tory and the other mayors will be riding their bicycles to Argentina this Fall? Do you think his honour is going to chomp down on crickets as opposed to a fine Argentinian steak come meal time?"
This is just an excerpt from The Ezra Levant Show, which airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET / 6 p.m. MT.
.
^^^^^^^^
C40 Cities - A global network of mayors taking urgent action to confront the climate crisis and create a future where everyone can thrive. Cutting emissions in half by 2030. A green and just recovery from COVID19...A world where everyone is included and everyone is safe.

A global network of mayors taking urgent action to confront the climate crisis and create a future where everyone can thrive.

1659059316731.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
2:55 min

Economist Adam Millsap on Inflation and Recession
RealAmericasVoice Published July 28, 2022

Economist Adam Millsap tells Steve Gruber: It's disappointing that Biden is not only trying to skirt the problem, but he's not doing anything to address the core issues driving inflation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
11:02 min

Blood Batteries Green 2030 Agenda? | IrnieracingNews (one of the streamers from the Canadian convoy)
irnieracing Published July 28, 2022 16 View

Electric cars run on batteries charged by coal plants. Batteries need many lbs of Cobalt. Cobalt comes from the CCP who makes Africa ch.il.d slaves gather the mineral for $1/day in terrible conditions. Thousands of Slaves will die for the Democrat green initiative. Blood Batteries and electric cars. #bloodbatteries #cobalt #electriccars #irnieracingnews

(Notes: Includes Rep Massie questioning Buttigieg on the grid capacity to handle EVs. Massie: It would take 4 times the electricity to charge the average household's cars as the average household uses on air conditioning. So if we reach the goal of 2030 that Biden has of 50% adoption, instead of 100% adoption, that means that the average household would use twice as much energy for one of their cars as they would for air conditioning for the entire year.. Do you think this could contribute to rolling blackouts and brownouts in areas of the country where air conditioning is basically considered essential? )

China Insider -
View: https://youtu.be/9k4Zkk8Bveo
9:43 min

Bloody Batteries: China's Exploitation of Congolese Children for Cobalt in Electric Car Batteries

Premiered Jul 27, 2022


China Insider with David Zhang
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
13:43 min

Tipping Point - The Dehumanizing Tyranny of Densification (Edward Ring)
One America News Network Published July 28, 2022

(Referenced is an article previously posted her by Chuck De Vore in The Federalist: China Buying US Land Is A Bigger Security Risk Than You Think
Letting China Purchase US Land Poses An Even Bigger National Security Risk Than You Think
BY: CHUCK DEVORE
JULY 27, 2022
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Fascism)

'Clear First Amendment violation': U.S. civil liberties attorney on government, big tech partnership 6:34 min

'Clear First Amendment violation': U.S. civil liberties attorney on government, big tech partnership
Rebel News Published July 28, 2022

On last night's episode of the Ezra Levant Show, Ezra was joined by American civil liberties attorney Jenin Younes to discuss her ongoing work on cases involving vaccine mandates as well her work on First Amendment cases revolving around government-supported big tech censorship

^^^^^
'Clear First Amendment violation': U.S. civil liberties attorney discusses government, big tech partnership
'The government is dictating the messages, what views are allowed to be heard and what views are not,' said civil liberties attorney Jenin Younes.

  • By Rebel News
  • July 28, 2022
On last night's episode of the Ezra Levant Show, Ezra was joined by American civil liberties attorney Jenin Younes to discuss her ongoing work on cases involving vaccine mandates as well her work on First Amendment cases revolving around government-supported big tech censorship.

Jenin described how the U.S. federal government has essentially been coercing social media companies into parroting the messaging of the state, while also encouraging them to clamp down hard on oppositional viewpoints or what the government deems as "disinformation."

Commenting on the increased regulation of social media companies such as Twitter in the wake of COVID-19, Jenin explained, "It's my opinion that if the Founding Fathers could have envisioned the internet and social media, they would have seen that this is a clear, clear First Amendment violation. I mean what you're doing is you're having the government, the government is dictating the messages, what views are allowed to be heard and what views are not. And the fact that it's using a private company to do so doesn't really change that."

This is just an excerpt from The Ezra Levant Show, which airs Monday–Friday at 8 p.m. ET / 6 p.m. MT.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

All The Trips To Davos Have Gone To Larry Fink's Head

THURSDAY, JUL 28, 2022 - 06:10 PM
Authored by Scott Shepard via RealClearMarkets.com,

Larry Fink really has let all of those trips to Davos go to his head.



In what is, so far as I know, the BlackRock CEO’s most recent act of public grandiloquence, he and BlackRock have urged the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) to modify its proposed greenhouse-gas emissions disclosure rule.

That standard Fink megalomania comes not from the request itself, but from its grounds. He does not ask that it be withdrawn because it is illegally beyond the SEC’s statutory remit, though it surely is, especially in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling. He doesn’t seek its withdrawal because it will create massive expense for no possible benefit, though that’s true too. He doesn’t even oppose the rule because it will harm small farmers, small businesses and small investors while aggregating wealth and opportunity to his own private-equity class. (Well, no: of course not that.)

Rather, Fink’s objection to the rule is that it deviated from the disclosure demands that have issued from him – from him and from Mike Bloomberg and from the self-appointed New Ruling Class – embodied this time as the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). These new malefactors of great self-regard, you see, don’t care for it when representatives of elected government dare to contradict the commandments of the World Economic Forum (WEF) set.

Mind you, the SEC’s proposed rule does violate its statutory authority; it does violate the Commission’s basic responsibility of assisting Main Street shareholders and smaller corporations in the capital markets; it is vastly costly, entirely pointless and wholly biased. The TCFD proposals are also immensely costly and entirely pointless and biased (in favor of politicized decarbonization, against basic technological and economic reality) though, and they come without any statutory or moral authority at all. The TCFD, like the Sustainable Accounting Standards Board and the WEF, is just an agglomeration of billionaires who have decided that they’d quite like the world to be run according to their personal policy preferences – thank you very much – and that they don’t intend to subject themselves to indignities like getting elected in order to achieve that end.

You can understand why they’ve dropped any plans to earn democratic legitimacy. Recall the spectacular failure that was Mike Bloomberg’s campaign for the Democratic nomination in 2020. From revelations that he had demanded that women staffers abort pregnancies to disclosures that old Nanny Bloomberg was pretty much an authoritarian all around, the Little Dictator didn’t come out of the experience very well. But that hasn’t thwarted his desire to rule.

Nor did it serve as a lesson to Fink. One might think Fink would be more careful, given that he carries a raft of fiduciary duties to investors and shareholders that Bloomberg, as the owner of a private company, doesn’t. But no. While he occasionally makes transparently false statements about the nonpartisan character of his interference with the governance and planning at the rest of U.S. publicly traded corporations, the truth invariably outs, as when he accidentally admitted that he is acting to “force” corporations, and through them all of us worldwide, to do his bidding, such as equity-based discrimination and politicized decarbonization, because he personally is “very passionate about” those policy goals.

In other words, Larry and Mike very much wish the world to dance to their tunes, exactly as they play them, and they don’t want any interfering governments trying to play along, even if it’s pretty much the same stupid tune.

Larry, though, may wish to take a care as he seeks to set a crown upon his head. For as he accumulates the real power of dictatorship, he also collects the responsibility, and the dangers.

Surely he is aware by now that forcing the West into climate-catastrophist decarbonization guarantees is already creating a pointless, but world-historical, disaster. Consider developments just in the last couple of weeks:
  • Germany, and Europe generally, have delivered themselves, bound and on their knees, to Russia, having decarbonized according to their incoherent political schedules rather than according to technological and financial need – just as Larry wants to “force” the U.S. to do because he personally is “very passionate about” it. All of this “threatens social peace” in Germany and around the continent – which is fine, right? Nothing bad has ever followed from that.
  • All of this has forced Europe to revert to coal use, meaning that political decarbonization leads to eventual recarbonization of the least-efficient sorts.
  • China continues to ramp up its coal production and use, as do India and other non-western nations, with none indicating any serious willingness to stop such increases. This is fair enough; why should they be denied moving from developing to developed because western billionaires want to change the rules, pulling the ladders up behind themselves? The result: no amount of western decarbonization can have any real effect on the earth’s climate, the only conceivable legitimate justification for decarbonization. (The growing suspicion that the WEF set knows that political decarbonization can’t achieve the stated goals, but really wants it as a way of keeping the hoi polloi trapped in constrained penury so that they can have the world to themselves is, of course, wholly illegitimate.)
  • Japan’s long-struggling economy has been hit hard by the current energy crisis, leaving it less prepared to respond to any negative effects that might arise from the climate change that political decarbonization can’t stop.
  • The Netherlands has erupted in protests in response to government nitrogen-reduction regulations that threaten to destroy one of Europe’s strongest agricultural centers. These pointless regulations, based on doubtful science, do their work just as the world faces serious food shortages.
  • Those food and energy deficiencies, driven by a series of “green” initiatives such as taking the whole country organic, have brought Sri Lanka to its knees – sending one president and prime minister already into exile, and the Sri Lankan people into dire suffering.
  • Here at home, Texas’ inexplicable and undefendable embrace of wind power threatens its energy reliability and – again – forces it back on record fossil-fuel demand.
There’s plenty more, but I think these items make the point. Or most of the point. Consider one last fact: that as Larry and Mike (and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America and David Solomon of Goldman Sachs and the rest of the Davos crowd) “force” American corporations to sign on to political-schedule decarbonization because they’re so personally passionate about it, they’ve also engineered an exemption from the European Union’s new “green” fuel tax for – do you even have to guess? – private jets.

Larry & Co., you see, mean not only to rule like dictators, but to live like dictators.

All of this put me in mind of Patrick Henry. In 1765, when a separate set of dictators (a crowd just as unelected by any Americans as the WEFers) sought to strip proto-Americans of their basic and fundamental rights through the Stamp Act, Henry offered a warning to George III, the chief unelected despot of that era. In the peroration of a speech against the act in the Virginia House of Burgesses he reminded his fellows that “Caesar had his Brutus, Charles the First his Cromwell and George the Third ... may profit by their example.”

As Larry, Mike, et al. grasp for themselves the power and trappings of tyranny in order to advance policies that will destroy both liberty and prosperity for the American people – just as George and his parliament did – let us hope that they, too, profit from those examples.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Manchin-Schumer Bill Cuts Emissions in Half In 8 Years – It’s the UN-WEF Agenda
By
M Dowling
-July 28, 2022

The new Schumer-Manchin BBB bill is now called the “Inflation Reduction Act,” a misnomer since it raises taxes by $330 BILLION and adding to inflation while we are in a recession.

As soon as Republicans voted for CHIPS, Manchin decided to go for the BBB bill that raises taxes, expands Obamacare, and sets up a slush fund for The Green New Deal.

Manchin double-crossed his Senate GOP colleagues to do Chuck Schumer’s bidding with a reconciliation gimmick. He’s a professional democrat and always gives in. Democrats punish integrity and reward treachery.

We are not hearing how this new bill matches up to the misery we see taking place throughout the Western World.

THE INFLATION BBB BILL IS AGENDA 2030
The Build Back Better bill puts us on the same path as Canada, Ireland, The Netherlands, and other nations being forced to cut farm emissions by 40%.


For example, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a 40% reduction plan. He gets there with huge reductions in oil and gas, heavy industry, electricity, and transportation. This is the same plan Biden’s administration is setting up for us. It’s based on the World Economic Forum and UN goals for Agenda 2030.

The climate package does open up leases for oil and gas, but only as a temporary bridge.

The real problem with this bill is it moves to reduce emissions 40% by 2030. With additional actions planned by Democrats, the cut in emissions will be 50 to 52% by 2030.


The ETC set a target of 40%. South Korea and the EU set a target of 40%. Some reports say the EU might cut emissions by 55%.

The BBB-Inflation Reduction Act calls for a 40-50% cut in emissions.

“It’s going to be the largest climate investment in American history by far,” Leah Stokes, an environmental politics professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, told The Hill.


It includes a long-term extension of clean energy tax credits in line with what we’ve previously modeled, which means it could plausibly put the U.S. on track to reduce emissions by 40 percent in 2030,” Ben King of Rhodium Group said in a statement.

“Additional action by the Biden administration and states can help close the rest of the gap to the target of a 50-52 percent cut in emissions by 2030,” he added.

Rhodium Group’s modeling has shown that without any legislative action, the U.S. would be expected to reduce its emissions by between 24 and 35 percent.

The bill would provide $30 billion in tax credits for manufacturing solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, and critical minerals processing. It includes an additional $10 billion in tax credits for clean energy technology manufacturing facilities that make electric vehicles, wind turbines, and solar panels.

All of this is a big boon for China. They make the parts.


Other provisions include $30 billion in loans and grants to help states and electric utilities transition to clean energy and $27 billion for a green bank that would provide more incentives for clean energy technology.

And while not directly related to climate change, the bill also puts $60 billion towards environmental justice — addressing disproportionately high pollution levels faced by people of color and low-income communities.

That is a complete waste of money. It’s a giveaway for a key voting bloc using a false crisis.

THE TEMPORARY RELIEF
The bill would require the federal government to hold oil and gas lease sales as a condition for selling leases for renewable energy on public lands and waters.

For the government to allow new wind or solar energy development on federal lands, it will be required to hold onshore drilling lease sales.

The legislation would also reinstate the results of a November lease sale for new offshore drilling that sold the rights to drill on 1.7 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico and was later struck down on environmental grounds. It would also require the Interior Department to hold other lease sales in the near future.

The administration plans to end fossil fuels well before alternative energy is ready to replace them. You will have to sacrifice, peasant.

(COMMENT: Even though the Senate has not approved the Climate Treaty, I believes this sets into law the climate emission reduction goals. This could negate challenges to regulations via W. Virginia v. EPA.)
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
22 “Non-Essential” Items to Stock Up on Before Things Get Much Worse LIVE

22 “Non-Essential” Items to Stock Up on Before Things Get Much Worse
The JD Rucker Show Published July 28, 2022

^^^^^

JUL 28 • 37M
22 "Non-Essential" Items to Stock Up on Before Things Get Much Worse

We all know we need the basics like food and shelter. But there's more to preparing for hard times ahead than just filling our bellies and putting a roof over our heads.
3 hr ago

Economic collapse. Martial law. Something worse. It's time to start prepping.

Food, water, shelter, medicine, and ammunition/firearms are five things that are essential for survival in a societal collapse. As the possibility of such a collapse increases seemingly every day, more people have been signing up my Late Prepper Substack. It's telling that just a few weeks ago we struggled to get free subscriptions, but today they come in even if we don't publish anything for several days.

I've neglected to post things here lately simply because I've been busy prepping myself. But a task I've been working on this week prompted me to take the list I made and share it with others. These are the "non-essential" items we're stocking up on now. By putting "non-essential" in quotes, I'm suggesting that yes, we can technically survive without them, but it's a lot easier if you have a good supply of these items.

This is not a comprehensive list by any means. It's just the things that I've logged as items we're stocking up on to make sure we're not caught flatfooted if the crap hits the fan. I made this list based on two criteria — usability and barter value. Some items we can buy cheaply today will be like gold in an end-times scenario.

One does not need to be a "doomsday prepper" living off-grid on a homestead in Montana to recognize the need for these items. Even city- and suburb-dwellers may lose access to such supplies if the system fails. Being ready is extraordinarily important, especially when we look at the trajectory of the nation and the world.

1. Bleach
Unscented bleach can literally be a lifesaver as it pertains to making water potable. While we recommend the Alexapure Water Filtration System, a little bit of bleach will do the trick as well. There are many other uses, of course, and perhaps most importantly it's very cheap... for now.

2. Batteries, Chargers
Batteries generally have a 10-year shelf life when unopened. We like rechargeable batteries, especially if you have a solar generator or other sustainable electricity supply.

3. Lighters, Matches, Alternative Fire-Starters
Fire can be the key to survival. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to produce for most people. Learning how to start and build a fire in a pinch is important, but I'm a big fan of stocking up on things that make it easier.

4. Contact Lenses, Glasses
Depending on optical and financial situation, it may behoove you to have a long-term supply of contact lenses. Have multiple glasses is definitely a best-practice. As for bartering and use, having a nice supply of inexpensive reading glasses could come in handy as well.

5. Super Glue
In a crap-hits-the-fan scenario, being able to fix things as they break is going to be extremely important. Glue is helpful.

6. Duct Tape
Like super glue, but for different purposes. I have ongoing shipments of six-packs of duct tape heading to my home every month.

7. Vaseline
As a lubricant and accelerant, few things are more useful than Vaseline, even without considering the medical benefits. A little Vaseline, a cotton ball, and a stick can make a little torch.

8. Insect Repellent
Call me paranoid, but I'm very concerned about mosquitos and other insects in a post-apocalyptic world. Heck, I'm not crazy about them now. As anyone who has been to Africa knows, mosquito bites can be deadly.

9. Soap, Toothpaste, Deodorant, Hygiene Items
They last a long time (indefinitely?), are extremely important for you health and wellbeing, and can be excellent barter currency if you have enough available. Besides, if things get better it's not like you won't go through your supply eventually.

10. Hand Sanitizer
Personally, I'm not a fan of hand sanitizer. But every list mentions them so I suppose a lot of people like it. Call me old-fashioned by I like soap and water.

11. Tools and Backups, Nails, Screws
Considering we may have to build or repair things in the long term if the crap hits the fan, making sure you have everything you need to accomplish your tasks makes sense. This should NOT be considered a barter item.

12. Knives and Saws
Unlike most other tools, sharp necessary items like knives and saws wear down rapidly with regular use. It behooves many of us to have plenty of high-quality sharps available.

13. Flashlights, Candles, Lanterns
I'm fan of variety over quality when it comes to lighting. I know many swear by the high-dollar versions of these items, but I'll take cheap and good enough quality in bulk for the same price. Some flashlights you keep should not need batteries; hand-cranked or solar flashlights can be hugely beneficial.

14. Paper, Pens, Pencils
So many uses, plus tons of regret if you don't have enough paper and writing instruments.

15. Toilet Paper, Paper Towels, and Rags
I was extremely annoyed during the Spring of 2020 when stores kept running out of toilet paper. I railed against people who bought two-year supplies of toilet paper. Today, I have a two-year supply of toilet paper. One important note: I'm a big fan of reusable rags and towels. Having disposable items is fine but require disposal and are obviously finite. Having rags you can use, clean, and reuse will be important.

16. Bungie Cord, Ropes, String, Zip Ties
Repairing an building will likely be required if the crap hits the fan and stays bad for a long time. Bungie cords, ropes, string, and zip ties have unlimited uses.

17. Seeds
This is a food items, but it's one that falls outside of the realm of straight food because it doesn't take up much space and can be stored away to be used in the distant future. If you have plenty of seeds, you may never use them, but if you don't have them you'll probably need them.

18. Tarps
Cheap and useful.

19. Plastic Bags
Cheap and useful, too.

20. Kids' Needs
Don't forget the kids, especially babies! Diapers, baby wipes, powders... we've seen in our current situation how hard it is to keep baby formula on the shelves. Imagine if the crap hits the fan how other items will also be hard to acquire.

21. Baking Soda
Unlimited uses, and not just for cooking.

22. Fire Extinguishers
If things continue to go south, it's not inconceivable that basic emergency services will be hard or even impossible to call. One does not want to lose everything over an accident that could have been easily suppressed.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Jul 28, 2022 at 9:09pm​
Dr. Jordan Peterson Interviewed me — amazing talk​
What do you think?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7gAEkzIgvw
1:23:19 min

Cometh the Horsemen: Pandemic, Famine, War | Michael Yon and Dr Jordan B Peterson

Jul 28, 2022


Jordan B Peterson


We are heading into one of the most epic famines in world history, where the poor will freeze in the dark and burn in the sun while they starve. Michael Yon, one of America’s youngest Green Berets at 19 years old, joins Dr Jordan B Peterson to discuss the current state of affairs across the globe. Michael has traveled and lived over half of his life abroad in more than 80 countries . Author of three books in the United States and three others in Japan, he is America’s most experienced combat correspondent.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Farmers Burn Hay, Block Roads With Manure In Latest Protest Against Climate Rules

Hay set ablaze in The Netherlands

[Screenshot/Twitter/RadioGenova]

NICOLE SILVERIOMEDIA REPORTER
July 28, 202211:02 AM ET

Farmers in the Netherlands set hay ablaze and dumped manure on major highways Wednesday in their ongoing protests against the government’s planned climate regulations.

The farmers caused the disruptions to voice opposition to The Hague’s plans to reduce emissions produced from livestock by 2030, Politico reported. The protests have spread across Europe: in Germany farmers blocked the Netherlands’ border, protesting an amendment set to increase reliance on renewable energy to 100% by 2025.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1552408953220468736
.19 min

Over 40,000 farmers have been out in the streets in July, where they have dumped hay and manure outside of government officials’ homes and on highways and major infrastructure. The government issued a statement in June announcing many farmers will have to go out of business due to the new climate legislation that is expected to pass.

Dutch farmers believe the government is being “arrogant” and ignoring farmers’ key concerns, as it is projected that 11,200 livestock farms will have to shut down and 17,600 farmers will have to reduce their livestock populations, according to Politico.

“We do not know what the economic impact will be, we do not know what the social and cultural impact will be on the countryside,” Wytse Sonnema, head of communications for LTO Netherlands, the country’s agriculture and horticulture organization, said according to Politico. “It goes beyond farming. This will impact not just the farm and agricultural sector, but the whole agricultural eco-system that surrounds it, and by extension the entire countryside.”

Former President Donald Trump voiced his support for the farmers’ protests during a speech earlier in July. In the speech, the former president applauded the Dutch protesters for “courageously” standing up against the government’s climate initiatives.

“Farmers in the Netherlands, of all places, are courageously opposing the climate tyranny of the Dutch government, — can you believe this? — which wants to dramatically cut Dutch farm production despite growing food shortages,” Trump said in the speech.

The legislation holds a majority of support in parliament, though it has not yet passed, Politico reported. Members of parliament are waiting to hear from a newly appointed mediator, Johan Remkes, who is meant to seek common ground between the government and the farmers.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Protesters leave a demonstration of Dutch farmers aiming to block the traffic in The Hague, Netherlands October 16, 2019. ...

By —
Mike Corder, Associated Press


Dutch farmers dump manure, garbage on roads to protest planned emission reductions

World Jul 27, 2022 2:42 PM EDT

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Dutch farmers protested government plans to reduce nitrogen emissions by dumping manure and garbage Wednesday on highways and setting fires alongside roads — the latest actions in a summer of discontent. Police urged them to stop for safety reasons and were investigating who was responsible.

Traffic authorities said several roads in the central and eastern Netherlands were completely or partially blocked by the early morning blockades and fire services rushed to clear roads as traffic built up. Cleanup operations were expected to take hours on some roads.

By the end of the day, some roads were still not cleared, in part because some companies involved in the cleanup had received threats, said Diederik Fleuren, a spokesman for the the government’s roads and waterways organization Rijkswaterstaat.

“We are doing everything to clear the roads but … some contractors are being intimidated,” Fleuren told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. He said it was not clear when all the roads would be fully cleaned.

“It is very extreme now that people are being threatened” for assisting the cleanup, he added.

Dutch media reported that at one location, a sign was left behind that said: “Sorry for the inconvenience, Rutte IV is driving us to despair,” a reference to Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s coalition government.

Police and security authorities appealed to farmers to halt what they described as dangerous situations.

“Protesting is a fundamental right and as long as it stays within the limits of the law, a lot is possible,” the emergency services said in a joint statement. But they said the latest actions “seriously endanger road safety and can lead to life-threatening situations for road users.”
The latest demonstrations came a day after a government-appointed mediator sent invitations to farmers’ organizations to discuss with the country’s ruling coalition ways of reducing nitrogen emissions.

“I see the talks as a turning point: breaking the deadlock together,” mediator Johan Remkes said. “The cabinet has assured me that there is room and joint solutions are possible.”

But some farmers have rejected the appointment of Remkes as an independent mediator because he is a member of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s center-right political party and a former deputy prime minister.

The farmers are angry at government targets for reining in emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia that they say threatens to wreck their agricultural way of life and put them out of business.

The government says emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia, which livestock produce, must be drastically reduced close to nature areas that are part of a network of protected habitats for endangered plants and wildlife stretching across the 27-nation European Union.

The ruling coalition wants to cut emissions of pollutants by 50 percent nationwide by 2030, calling the measure an “unavoidable transition” to improve soil, air and water quality in a EU nation known for its intensive farming practices. It has called on provincial authorities to draw up plans to reduce emissions and earmarked an extra 24.3 billion euros ($24.6 billion) to fund the changes.

Farmers argue that they are being unfairly targeted while other industries, such as aviation, construction and transport, also are contributing to emissions and face less far-reaching rules. They also say the government is not giving them a clear picture of their futures amid the proposed reforms.

Earlier this year, the farmers blocked highways with tractors and blockaded supermarket distribution centers.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Taking a page out of fellow WEF comrade Justin Trudeau’s book, Dutch PM Mark Rutte has decided to label nationwide farmer protests as “small” and “unacceptable.”

Mark Rutte calls farmer protests small and unacceptable
Mark Rutte calls farmer protests “small” and “unacceptable”

“The protests by a small group of farmers on highways yesterday and this morning are unacceptable. Willfully endangering others, damaging our infrastructure and threatening people who help clean up is beyond all limits. Report a threat,” Rutte wrote in a tweet. [translated from Dutch]

“These life-threatening actions must stop. There are plenty of other ways to express your dissatisfaction within the law. Most farmers do that too.”

Rutte’s comments come as the Dutch Uprising reaches new heights of intensity, with farmers upping the ante and lighting massive haybale fires and smearing piles of manure along roads.

This has led to a complete shut down of several major highways and has required the work of firefighters and government contractors to resolve.

Put simply, Rutte can’t ignore the farmers anymore. He needs to respond directly and has chosen to walk the precarious path taken by Canadian PM Justin Trudeau: he’s doubling down and maligning protesters.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1552604267940233216
.19 min

1659069970209.png

Indeed, Rutte’s comments are eerily similar to Trudeau’s speech earlier this year in which he infamously labelled peaceful truckers that garnered the support of millions a “small fringe minority” with “unacceptable views.”

“The small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa, who are holding unacceptable views that they are expressing, do not represent the views of Canadians,” Trudeau said in January.

“(Canadians) who have been there for each other, who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country.”

View: https://youtu.be/cWv-1z5hjzA
2:14 min

This strategy didn’t work, and the truckers ended up staying in Ottawa for nearly a month before being cleared away by a nameless police force free of identifiers. The optics were terrible, and Trudeau became the subject of international scorn and condemnation.

Most provincial mandates were dropped in the midst of the protest, and while some remain, the truckers were mostly successful in ending COVID hysteria in Canada. Only time will tell if Dutch farmers can likewise succeed in the Netherlands.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

OPINION: What plot lurks behind the Dutch Farmers protest?
An introduction to the "Tri-State City."

Mordor
Jul 27

Tri-State City proposal map

By now, no doubt you have seen countless videos of Dutch Farmers protesting against national government policies intended to destroy the Farmers livelihoods by way of numerous agricultural restrictions. These are frequently described as limitations on emissions — primarily designed to restrict Nitrogen usage or Carbon output. This type of regulation would decimate the ability of Dutch Farmers to produce and export agricultural goods. Perhaps machinery like tractors would become too costly to operate, or the farmers livestock would have to be killed.

As with all machinations lately — there is in fact a hidden agenda at play behind the scenes.

Behind these restrictions lies an opportunity for the Dutch government to conduct a massive land grab. Further behind this land grab is a longer-term plan to urbanize and standardize the business and marketing plans of all major Dutch cities into a single unified “network” of cities.

Thanks for reading In the Land of the Blind! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

The following article from October 30th, 2017 explains the intent of the Tristate City more clearly. Interesting to note is that the population of the Netherlands is approximately 17,000,000 — yet the article references a “regional” population of 30,000,000 — which makes this a supranational (cross-borders) project. Which borders exactly? We’re getting to that…
Dutch investors launch new marketing programme for NL: Tristate City
A group of institutional investors in the Netherlands have joined forces to present the Netherlands plus parts of Belgium and Germany as a single city network named Tristate City.

The project, backed by Dutch employers organisation VNO-NCW, says the region’s population of 30 million people creates a ‘sustainable urban power house’. The project’s supporters include property developers and pension funds as well as Utrecht’s economic board.

Dutch cities, the organisation says, are too small to compete in what it calls the ‘battle of the cities’, in which mega cities compete for investment and talent.

By treating the Netherlands as an urbanised delta with 17 million inhabitants, the project’s supporters say that are creating a very strong player in this ‘battle of the titans.’

Thanks to reporting done by Michael Yon on the ground in the Netherlands alongside the Dutch Farmers — now we know that this proposed mega-region includes the following countries:
Belgium. Germany. Netherlands.
The entirety of the Netherlands as well as the following cities are likely to be a part of this sprawling mega-project:

Cologne, Germany
Brussels, Belgium (Headquarters of NATO)

Micheal Yon reports that:
“This is actually meant to be the future Capitol of the world.”
In summation — behind the proposed agricultural restrictions lies a supranational plot to create a massive regional and global economic powerhouse.

Watch the video below for more information on this topic.
Michael Yon: Farmers Continue Their Uprising 4:26 min

Michael Yon: Farmers Continue Their Uprising
Bannons War Room Published July 25, 2022
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dutch farmers in a rage over emissions cuts
3h ago

Hay bales in flames, manure dumped on highways, blockades at supermarket distribution centres and demonstrations on politicians' doorsteps.

Farmers made their way to the Dutch parliament in The Hague in their tractors as part of their protests
© BBCFarmers made their way to the Dutch parliament in The Hague in their tractors as part of their protests

Dutch farmers have been generating global headlines with protests described by Prime Minister Mark Rutte as "wilfully endangering others, damaging our infrastructure and threatening people who help with the clean-up".

This proud farming nation is under immense pressure to make radical changes to cut harmful emissions, and some farmers fear their livelihoods will be obliterated.

"It's in our blood, I want to do this, and if we have to adapt to new situations, I want to, but we have to be fair, it takes time - give me a chance," says Geertjan Kloosterboer, a third-generation dairy farmer.

We are standing in his recently built barn, surrounded by red and white cows, as his eldest son sweeps past us on a small digger.

Dairy farmer Geertjan Kloosterboer says government proposals to cut livestock feels so unfair
© BBCDairy farmer Geertjan Kloosterboer says government proposals to cut livestock "feels so unfair"

I ask if Geertjan sees a future for his children in farming.

"I don't know if that's what they want. When we talk about farming it's just stress. But I want them to have a choice, not for the government to make that choice for them."

Dutch government proposals for tackling nitrogen emissions indicate a radical 30% cut in livestock, a reduction in intensive farming and the conversion to sustainable "green farms".

As such, the relocation or buyout of farmers is almost inevitable, but forced buyouts are a scenario many hope to avoid.

The cabinet has allocated €25bn (£20bn) to slicing nitrogen emissions within the farming industry by 2030, and the targets for specific areas and provinces have been laid out in a colour-coded map.

Women also attended the protests outside parliament - the sign on this tractor reads: Proud farmer's wife
© BBCWomen also attended the protests outside parliament - the sign on this tractor reads: "Proud farmer's wife"

By July 2022 the provincial governments must submit their ideas for hitting those goals - but a handful of provinces have hinted they will not play ball.

'We need insects'
Biodiversity is under threat. Native species are disappearing more rapidly here than elsewhere in Europe, according to the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Rudi Buis, a representative from the ministry of agriculture, tells me the stakes are high: "It's necessary to improve the nature, for our health, for clean air, water, soil and also for the agriculture because we need biodiversity. We need insects for our crops... if we want some economic activity in the future, we also have to improve our nature."

In May 2019, the Council of State ruled the government's strategy for reducing excess nitrogen breached EU directives on preserving vulnerable habitats.

Related video: Dutch farmers worried by 'unrealistic' emissions reduction target

View on Watch 2:24 min

The judgment meant every activity that led to nitrogen being emitted, from building new homes to farming, required a permit.

Pinning hopes on technology
Agriculture is accountable for nearly half of Dutch nitrogen emissions.

Ammonia (nitrogen and hydrogen, or NH3) comes from manure mixed with urine, and when this washes away into ditches, rivers and the sea, it can be harmful to nature.

Nitrogen oxides (nitrogen and oxygen, NOx) are mainly produced when fossil fuels are burned - traffic, aviation, shipping and industry all contribute.

Plans are also afoot to reduce pollution around Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the port of Rotterdam, on roads and in households.

Slow-moving tractors have caused delays for motorists travelling on motorways across the Netherlands
© Getty ImagesSlow-moving tractors have caused delays for motorists travelling on motorways across the Netherlands

Meanwhile, many are pinning their hopes on technological solutions.

Already, air scrubbers and excrement-sweeping robots operate in barns, while sloping floors are encouraged to reduce contact between the manure and urine - but in most cases they still meet in the cellar.

Diluting manure with water or acidifying it, leaving cows out to pasture more and giving them lower protein feed can also help to reduce harmful gasses.

But this new technology and these practices alone are unlikely to achieve the ambitious environmental goals.

'I'm not a fire-starter'
The Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) is surging in the polls.

On a visit to a farm near the Dutch city of Deventer, party leader Caroline van der Plas expressed concern about the increasingly toxic nature of the debate.

She warned that small groups of frustrated farmers were being radicalised on social media, in Telegram groups and in chat rooms manipulated by far-right politicians who saw the potential to jump on the tractor protests to plough their own agendas.

"I understand their anger but I am not a fire-starter... and let's be real, the country is not exploding, it's not like there will be a civil war in the next months, but the government has to start talking to the farmers, not just talking but listening and really hearing them or things will get worse."

Despite this, Ms Van der Plas says her party will not sit down with government negotiators: "We want the whole nitrogen policy and plans that are on the table right now put on hold and to look for other solutions.

"I said in the [parliamentary] debates, be careful what you wish for because when the farmers are gone, they are not going to come back. If we depend on imports - you see it with gas from Russia - we have a big problem."

'Broken system'
Natasja Oerlemans, head of food and agriculture at WWF Netherlands, believes farmers have the potential to be part of the solution.

Dutch farmers in a rage over emissions cuts
© Provided by BBC NewsDutch farmers in a rage over emissions cuts

She says while some farmers might be forced to leave the industry, others could adapt and provide different services in a changing climate.

"Storing water when there's too much rain - in a densely populated country like the Netherlands, this can provide huge opportunities for farmers to gain extra income and work in the future."

But, Ms Oerlemans warns, the Netherlands is facing a painful period of uncertainly and unrest, describing the agricultural system as "broken".

She says for years the government has failed to act on scientific data, meaning drastic measures are now needed to tackle the issue. The farming industry's focus on increasing livestock productivity, she adds, has had a detrimental impact on the ecosystem.

"My lesson would be don't follow the pathway that the Dutch agricultural system has followed over the past decades, because that's a dead end."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dutch Farmers Back on Their Bullshit
Farmers dumped manure on a Dutch highway to protest environmental regulations.
By
Erin Marquis
Yesterday 3:00PM

Cars drive past manure and debris dumped on the A50 road during a farmers’ demonstration against the government’s nitrogen policy, near Apeldoorn on July 27, 2022. - Netherlands OUTPhoto: Sem van der Wal / ANP / AFP (Getty Images)

Not to be outdone by the Canadian Freedom Convoy or America’s People Convoy, Dutch farmers formed a tractor convoy Wednesday to prove they can be just as nonsensical and destructive after they set up road blockades, dumped manure and garbage on roads and lit hay bales on fire in their wake.

That’s some serious shit. Roads in central and eastern Netherlands were blocked by tractor convoys and covered in poo, with some remaining closed even at the end of the day. Police said the clean up was taking longer as companies hired to help received violent threats over their efforts. From the Associated Press:
“We are doing everything to clear the roads but … some contractors are being intimidated,” Fleuren told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. He said it was not clear when all the roads would be fully cleaned.

“It is very extreme now that people are being threatened” for assisting the cleanup, he added.
Dutch media reported that at one location, a sign was left behind that said: “Sorry for the inconvenience, Rutte IV is driving us to despair,” a reference to Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s coalition government.
[...]
The farmers are angry at government targets for reining in emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia that they say threatens to wreck their agricultural way of life and put them out of business.
The government says emissions of nitrogen oxide and ammonia, which livestock produce, must be drastically reduced close to nature areas that are part of a network of protected habitats for endangered plants and wildlife stretching across the 27-nation European Union.

Police are investigating the incident while begging farmers to lay off the fecal flinging and fire setting as it’s dangerous to other Danes on the road. What stirred up Dutch farmers enough to soil the country’s roads? An invite from a government-appointed mediator to discuss with farmers the best way to reduce the country’s notoriously high nitrogen oxide and ammonia emissions. However the mediator, Johan Remkes was appointed by the country’s center-right Prime Minister and therefore is untrustworthy to the farther-right farmers.

Farmers say they are being unfairly targeted while airlines and other polluting industries are not being regulated. But farming is big business in the Netherlands; the country is the number one exporter of meat on the European continent and is often referred to as the “little country that feeds the world.” It also has the highest density on farm animals in Europe — over 100 million animals in a country smaller than West Virginia. All this animal husbandry has resulted in an overload of polluting waste that’s been a sore spot in the Netherlands for years.

In 2019, the highest court in the Netherlands found the country was breaking EU laws by not doing enough to curb runoff and air pollution near fresh water habitats. Last year, the government came up with a drastic €25 billion plan to reduce the number of cows in the Netherlands by a third, the Guardian reports. This plan would require some farmers to voluntarily give up farming, going for “extensive” farming where cattle graze on larger pastures than the current intensive style of farming.

We dig the Dutch here. Thousands threatened to throw eggs at Jeff Bezo’s Mega yacht if a historic bridge was dismantled to remove it and dock workers in the country sent back a tanker full of Russian oil. But this seems a rare miss from the little country that could. Just having access to enough manure to close major roads kind of implies that there is an excess of the stuff. Throwing trash on the roads when claiming to want time to come up with green farming techniques also seems to go against the main message. Not all farmers feel the same way.

Some farmers told the Guardian their way of life is quickly changing anyway:
“We don’t have to feed the world, but we could show how to do it in a more sustainable way,” said organic dairy farmer Jaring Brunia, from Friesland in the north of the country.
[...]
Some farmers appeared more resigned to the changes, saying there was no future for intensive farming in the densely populated Netherlands. “We farm in the back yards of the city and everything is watched,” said dairy farmer Heleen Lansink-Marissen, from Haaksbergen in eastern Netherlands.
“We can’t fight for the past. We need a plan for the future and how to make money through biodiversity, carbon offsetting and a little bit less milk,” she added.
This is far from the first time European farmers have dumped dumps on the road in order to make a point. French farmers also let loose their animals’ waste in 2014. They did it again in 2019 when farmers angry about a trade deal with Canada dumped manure directly on the steps of lawmakers’ offices instead of roads used by everyone. That same year Dutch farmers used their tractors to shut down freeways leading to The Hague.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dutch prime minister: Farmers must stop blocking motorways
DPA - 19h ago

Protesting farmers who have been blocking Dutch motorways came in for criticism from Prime Minister Mark Rutte on Thursday.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte attends a press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Andreas Gora/DDP Pool/dpa
© DPADutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte attends a press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Andreas Gora/DDP Pool/dpa

"The deliberate endangerment of others, the damage to our infrastructure and the threat to people helping with clean-up work goes beyond all limits," he tweeted. These "life-threatening actions" must stop, the head of government demanded.

In protest against environmental regulations, farmers had blocked lanes with barricades made of waste, hay as well as car tyres on Wednesday and, in some cases, also set fires, according to the Dutch transport authority. This led to long traffic jams.

The clean-up efforts were ongoing on Thursday; in some places they were disrupted by demonstrators. The authorities warned of dangerous situations for motorists. The actions were mainly concentrated in the east of the country near Apeldoorn, Amersfoort and Hengelo, close to the German border.

Dutch farmers have been protesting for weeks against planned measures to drastically reduce nitrogen emissions. By 2030, emissions are to be reduced by 50% on average. According to government calculations, this could mean the closure of 30% of the country's livestock farms.

Rutte further explained that only "a small group of farmers" was involved in the blockade actions. "There are enough other ways to express your discontent within the legal limits. And most farmers do it that way too," Rutte said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

(US)
R-CALF USA Supports Dutch Farmers

News NEWS | July 21, 2022

Billings, Mont. – In what seems like a bizarre twist, the U.S. ranch group that rails against the global and domestic trade policies that have relegated the U.S. to be a net importer of beef, today announced its support for Dutch farmers protesting in the Netherlands, a beef exporting country from which the ranch group has tried to block imports.

“But this isn’t about trade policy,” said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard adding, “The Netherlands is ground zero for a globalized effort to control the food supply and those who produce it.”

Dutch farmers have been protesting for weeks against the Netherlands’ mandate to cut emissions of nitrous oxide and ammonia in half by 2023, an action that inexplicably places the blame for environmental pollution squarely on the shoulders of Dutch farmers.

It is unknown why other sectors of the Netherlands’ economy were not subject to similar mandates, and the government’s reported remarks that not all Dutch farmers will be able to stay in business seems to disregard any concern for reductions in food production almost certain to occur under the mandate.

Protest editorialists report the mandate is expected to reduce Dutch livestock numbers by as much as 30%, which is expected to drive many Dutch farmers out of business. This helps explain why tens of thousands of Dutch farmers are reportedly protesting.

In a YouTube video posted last week, Bullard described how the Netherlands’ mandate is an extension of efforts by the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (GRSB) that enlists global banks, global beef packers, and global retailers to devise and then impose universal production standards and production requirements on animal husbandry in the U.S. and around the world.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfJ9CHCCVPY
4:55 min

Bullard claims the universal production standards and requirements sought by the GRSB through private global corporations can have the same force and effect as the Netherlands’ government mandate. He said this is because global corporations now dominate livestock marketing outlets and can condition timely access to those markets on full compliance with GRSB standards.

“Dutch farmers are facing an immediate threat to their livelihoods, liberty and independence,” said Bullard adding, “America’s cattle farmers and ranchers are on the cusp of suffering the same fate, which is why R-CALF USA supports the Dutch farmer-protestors who are fighting on the front line.”

R-CALF USA President Brett Kenzy said the two conditions that make globalization such a threat to the liberty and independence of all citizens are now exemplified in the Netherlands – “runaway government and runaway concentration.”

Wyoming rancher and attorney Tracy Hunt, a nationally recognized critic of the GRSB said, “Whether by collusive actions by globally powerful privately owned banks, NGOs (non-government organizations) or corporations, government fiat or “public-private partnerships,” the Dutch farmers’ actions are measured and justified.”

Bullard said if the Dutch mandate was truly about improving the environment for and the welfare of Dutch citizens, the government would have worked with Dutch farmers to create alternative production practices that would ensure the economic viability of their farming operations, a lessening of environmental impacts, and no interruption to food production.

“That such commonsense foreplanning did not occur suggests this is nothing but a ploy by the Dutch government to whip many or all of its nation’s famers into submission. We urge all Americans to join with us in admonishing the Dutch government’s action and to stand in support of Dutch Farmers,” he concluded.
–R-CALF USA

^^^^^
Home - Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (initiated by the World Wildlife Fund :fgr:)

1659072829106.png

Download Sustainability Goals https://grsbeef.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/GRSB-Global-Goals-2021-Public-ENG.pdf

1659072898876.png
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Gov. Kristi Noem to Newsmax: China 'Will Control Us' If They Control Our Food Supply

(Newsmax/"The Record With Greta Van Susteren")
By Nicole Wells | Thursday, 28 July 2022 08:07 PM EDT

Video on website 5:31 min

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem told Newsmax Thursday that reports of China buying farmland in the United States is cause for concern because the communist nation will "control us if they control what goes in our grocery stores."

"There are limitations in [South Dakota] state law as to how much they can buy, and I think that's very wise and something every state should be looking at," Noem said during an appearance on Newsmax's "The Record With Greta Van Susteren." "I think that, even in this discussion that we are having right now, South Dakota will be continuing to restrict the ability of foreign countries to come and buy up our land, buy into our companies.

"We've had this discussion in the food processing business for quite some time," the Republican governor continued. "You know, a lot of our meat packers are foreign-owned; and when you get concentration, they control our food supply and part of this purchase of land is that long-term agenda that China has."

Noem said that China is "not just investing in their military."

"They're investing in our food-supply chain, and they will control us if they control what goes in our grocery stores," she said.

The New York Post reported that the Chinese were the most active buyers of U.S. real estate among foreigners last year, spending $6.1 billion on homes mainly in California and Florida.

New reports indicate that while China is allowed to purchase land and property in the U.S., the process is much more difficult for foreigners looking to purchase real estate in China.

Noem also said that she's been sounding the alarm on this issue for some time.

"I've been warning about our food, where it grows and how many people control it, as a national security issue for over 15 years. But we're getting to a point now where I think the rest of America is waking up to that danger," she added.
 
Top