CUCK Kavanaugh Joins Libs, Setting Stage for Biden to Expel Unvaxed SEALs from Navy


Kavanaugh Joins Libs, Setting Stage for Biden to Expel Unvaxed SEALs from Navy
17
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 23: Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh stands during a group photo of the Justices at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021.
Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images
Jordan Dixon-Hamilton26 Mar 2022295

3:52


Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the Supreme Court’s majority decision in its vote to allow the Pentagon to consider Navy SEALs’ vaccination status in making deployment decisions.

Although conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, Kavanaugh joined the majority’s decision to not intervene with the military’s coronavirus vaccine mandate.

Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion:
I concur in the Court’s decision to grant the Government’s application for a partial stay of the District Court’s preliminary injunction for a simple overarching reason: Under Article II of the Constitution, the President of the United States, not any federal judge, is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.
Kavanaugh claimed the district court “in effect inserted itself into the Navy’s chain of command” by halting the military vaccine mandate.

Thirty-five Navy SEALs brought this lawsuit after President Joe Biden’s administration mandated the coronavirus vaccine for all service members.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor of the Northern District of Texas issued an order preventing the Navy from considering the vaccine status of SEALs when giving deployments and other operational assignments in January.

Biden’s administration appealed Judge O’Connor’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which refused to override O’Connor’s preliminary injunction blocking the military’s mandate.

The Supreme Court on Friday issued a stay on the district court’s injunction, allowing the Navy to consider vaccination status for deployments while litigations surrounding the mandate continue.

The SEALs alleged the Navy’s vaccine mandate violated their First Amendment right to religious freedom. However, Kavanaugh claimed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act “does not justify judicial intrusion into military affairs in this case.”

“I see no basis in this case for employing the judicial power in a manner that military commanders believe would impair the military of the United States as it defends the American people,” Kavanaugh concluded in his dissent.

Justice Alito called the Court’s decision “a great injustice” in a dissent joined by Justice Gorsuch.

Justice Alito wrote:
By rubberstamping the Government’s request for what it calls a “partial stay,” the Court does a great injustice to the 35 respondents—Navy Seals and others in the Naval Special Warfare community—who have volunteered to undertake demanding and hazardous duties to defend our country. These individuals appear to have been treated shabbily by the Navy, and the Court brushes all that aside. I would not do so, and I therefore dissent.
Although the Navy offers religious exemptions for the vaccine, Alito echoed Judge O’Connor’s sentiments that described the exemption program as “theater.”

“Later Navy directives told service members that they could apply for religious exemptions, … but this program, as described by the District Court, was largely “theater” designed to result in the denial of almost all requests,” Alito wrote.

As of Wednesday, the Navy has only granted nine religious accommodations for Individual Ready Reserve members (who must be fully vaccinated prior to returning to service), and zero religious exemptions have been granted out of the 3,320 applications for accommodation by active service duty members.

The case will now continue in federal court, which Alito noted could take years. But Kavanaugh’s voting with the liberal justices does not bode well, and could mean that these warriors will soon be jettisoned from the military.

The case is Austin v. U.S. Navy SEALs, No. 21A477 in the Supreme Court of the United States.
 

Samuel Adams

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Any displaced Seals can come hang at my humble spread.

You know, the whole “better to be a warrior in a garden” thing.

I suspect, in short enough time, we’d find plenty to do that wasn’t necessarily, entirely....agricultural, in nature......



:whistle:
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
To say the least, Interesting.
And yes, how does a court, any court, get involved in anything operational or procedural in the military?
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
And don't forget - it was Trump who nominated Kavanaugh.
More accurately I think, DJT endorsed candidates put forth by McConnell whose agenda was to get as many GOP appointed Justices on the Court as possible as fast as possible. Morally, I always thought Kavanaugh was not the best choice but he swore and attested he'd follow The Constitution. He's only been on The Court for a short time so, we'll see what we see.
 
Last edited:

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
And don't forget - it was Trump who nominated Kavanaugh.

INDEED . . . which "shows ta go ya" just how ridiculous this BULLSHIT has actually become . . this political attitude of "how can I accelerate the angle of declination at an even greater rate?"

WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND
can't see the obviously ON PURPOSE nature of this carefully PLANNED DESTRUCTION?
 
Last edited:

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
So are we. It was always voluntary.

Not really. Not for a lot of people.

If I put a gun up to your head and say "Voluntarily hand over your wallet or I'll shoot you," is it really voluntary? You didn't HAVE to hand over your wallet. You were under no state compulsion. You could have just been shot.

Same with everybody who had to take the shot or lose their job. It was "always voluntary" then too. Just like keeping you employed was voluntary for someone else.
 

SpokaneMan

Veteran Member
I wouldn't mind a civilian SEAL force team across this country. I'd bet you'd get a million volunteers right out of the gate. It could be a not for profit entity.
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
Wonder how much thought he's given to the fact these are Navy SEALs! They will not stop being SEALs just because they are no longer in the military. Their training will not disappear because some judge kicks them out of the military.

As he judges so will he be judged.
 

nomifyle

TB Fanatic
Kavanaugh has been a disappointment, but then again he probably lost his mind during the conformation.

the blasted dems are not going to let their precious POS go through what he did. I pray she does not get confirmed.

Judy
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
And licking their lips. Oh, they will be in for one hell of a fight if they become too overt, but the internal enemies have made it a lit easier for the external ones.
If they are no longer in the military then they are or will shortly be privet US citizens, hopefully in the US. Maybe that is where and who they are supposed to be. God turns evil to his use. God knows all the tools in his box down to the last hair on their heads.
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
Guess no one showed him the whistle blower report that showed the extreme effects on those in the military who took the shot.....that leak alone should be enough to stop the shot in its tracks........let alone the malfeasance attributed to the CDC.

The truth has no place on the world stage.....idiots, tyrants, one and all.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Guess no one showed him the whistle blower report that showed the extreme effects on those in the military who took the shot.

SCOTUS isn't there to evaluate military practice. They're there to resolve Constitutional issues and disputes between states. The question at hand was not whether the jab is good (it's not) but whether ordering it is the purview of the President or of some judge. The President may make a stupid decision, but it's his to make.
 

lostinaz

Senior Member
Weird thing is, I got some odd news yesterday about the military mandate. My son's friend went off to join the navy a little over a year ago. They tested him and put him into nuclear engineering school, so he's a bright kid. Also a return missionary who speaks a couple languages. They tried like hell to get him to take the shot, including threatening him with dishonorable discharge. I figured we would see him back again stuck working construction or something. Well, something changed, because they made him a new offer: if he extends his commitment another 4 years, they will leave him alone. Wierd huh? Someone with a brain must have panicked realized we need some people with brains (not transgender Lantinx whatevers) to run all those nuclear vessels now that we might be entering WW3.
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
SCOTUS isn't there to evaluate military practice. They're there to resolve Constitutional issues and disputes between states. The question at hand was not whether the jab is good (it's not) but whether ordering it is the purview of the President or of some judge. The President may make a stupid decision, but it's his to make.
If I'm a judge, and I have the knowledge that the shot has a horrendous track record and should be stopped immediately, I'd use my power and position to further that cause.....period. I'd never just acquiesce to some set of rules that would not apply at this point. Treason is as treason does.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
If I'm a judge, and I have the knowledge that the shot has a horrendous track record and should be stopped immediately, I'd use my power and position to further that cause.....period. I'd never just acquiesce to some set of rules that would not apply at this point. Treason is as treason does.

Activist judges are a large part of the problem. We don't need more of them.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Oh, you don't say? Who would'a thunk it? Operation Warp Speed, ya know.

Dang, should be able to stick with the rule of law and not commit a gross miscarriage of justice or violate human rights.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Guess no one showed him the whistle blower report that showed the extreme effects on those in the military who took the shot.....that leak alone should be enough to stop the shot in its tracks........let alone the malfeasance attributed to the CDC.

The truth has no place on the world stage.....idiots, tyrants, one and all.

I believe that there should be:

1648416557891.png

May all of these evil minions have it put back onto/into them and their families, what they are attempting to force on others! They know. Add this "judge" to the list of dissidents and murderers.
 

BornFree

Came This Far
Kavanaugh is a slimy Liberal as is ACB. They vote with the lawless left pretty much every time. Nothing like having all your soldiers dropping dead of heart attacks and strokes in the heat of battle.
 
Last edited:

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Insanity is the New Norm in the U.S. as Professional Sports Players can be Exempt from COVID Vaccine Mandates but Navy Seals Cannot






1648420713220.png

NYC Lifts Vaccine Mandate for Athletes, Performers
By Ty & Charlene Bollinger
March 25, 2022

New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced yesterday that athletes and performers would no longer be subject to the city’s strict vaccine mandates for the private sector. The executive order has elicited backlash from both supporters of the mandate and those who have been put out of work by them.

Until now, unvaccinated players on NYC teams were unable to play in their home venues – even though most were allowed to play in other cities. This includes the Brooklyn Nets, New York Knicks, New York Yankees, and New York Mets.

Other performers will also be exempt under Mayor Adams’ executive order, bringing more artists back to the city’s venues.

Earlier this month, Adams nixed rules that required patrons of indoor establishments – such as restaurants, bars, and gyms – to be vaccinated. Those new rules, however, fail to include the support staff that make these events possible. While a basketball player or musician can now perform at NYC venues, concessions workers, security staff, Audio crews, and the like are still subject to the vaccine mandate.

Unvaccinated Harlem resident Elissa Embree choked back tears while telling The Washington Post how she was sent home last week from preseason orientation for her job as a waitress at the Mets’ Citi Field, where the athletes she supports are now able to play.

“I’m not as important as a Met is, because a Met will fill Citi Field, which fills the coffers of New York,” she said. “They don’t care about little ol’ me, who pays middle class taxes. The elusive ‘they’ don’t care that I have been out of work and that I have been at my breaking point.”

The most high-profile case is Nets star guard Kyrie Irving, who is not vaccinated against COVID-19 and made clear he would not be getting the vaccine at any point. The Nets originally started the season without Irving because of his decision not to get vaccinated but have since allowed him to play in games not hosted in NYC.

Asked why athletes and performers are receiving an exemption from vaccine policies but not teachers, police officers, firefighters and stadium workers, Adams said the exemption already existed for athletes and performers who do not live in New York City, a policy that existed under former mayor Bill de Blasio.

“A small number of people have an outsized impact on our economy,” Adams said.

And that’s really what this new executive order is about: money.

While our first reaction was to applaud Mayor Adams’ decision to roll back mandates, the truth is that he’s simply protecting the city’s income. Everyday employees in the private sector are still subject to the mandate. Many of them are outraged.

FDNY firefighter Sophy Medina — who’s been on unpaid leave since applying for a religious exemption from the vaccine mandate in November — is one of those employees.

“How would anyone feel when they are told something is being done for public safety and health, and then you can clearly see that people are getting exemptions — not based on their religion, not based on their belief system and not based on science?” she said.

“There should be a re-entry program for workers to get their jobs back,” said Harry Nespoli, president of the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association and chair of the Municipal Labor Committee. “There can’t be one system for the elite and another for the essential workers of our city. We stand ready to work out the details with the mayor, as we have been throughout this process.”

Kelly Finlaw, an arts teacher in Washington Heights for 16 years, was one of the city’s 956 school employees fired for not getting vaccinated. Ms. Finlaw, who was fired last week, said she is unvaccinated because she had adverse reactions to vaccines as a child and because she has lingering questions about its safety.

She said she applied for exemptions to the mandate for teachers three times and was denied.

Ms. Finlaw said the exemption to the vaccine mandate for athletes and performers made Mayor Adams look “foolish” and demonstrated that decisions were made around politics, not public health.

“When Kyrie decided to not get vaccinated and was willing to take a stand for it in the beginning, I was very, very grateful because he has notoriety that no teacher is ever going to have,” Ms. Finlaw said.

Mr. Irving, she added, “doesn’t do more important work than I do.”

And she’s absolutely right. While superstar athletes and artists admittedly generate more income for the city, their roles are not nearly as important as the roles of teachers, firefighters, and a litany of other “less-than” employees who have been impacted by these unconstitutional mandates.

The mayor’s decision reverberated beyond the sports world and into the political spectrum, transcending party lines. Lee Zeldin, who is running for governor on the Republican line, said the mayor’s action bolstered the party’s argument for getting rid of the vaccine mandate entirely.

Adrienne Adams, the current Council speaker and a Democrat, said the move smacked of “inequity” and warned that the mayor was sending “increasingly ambiguous messages” about public health at a time when the coronavirus case count is rising.

Jay Varma, the former health adviser for Mr. Adams’s predecessor, Bill de Blasio (another democrat), warned that the move opened the city up to legal action on the grounds that the remaining mandate is “arbitrary and capricious.”

The arbitrary rules to which the American people have been subjected are not based in science. They have been used to control us, making us more dependent on the government while favoring the rich and powerful.

While there is some hope that the new rule will open legal avenues for the unvaccinated to reclaim or retain their jobs, there’s something even more important that you can do to combat the rampant tyranny we’ve faced over the last few years: RESIST.

Relying on the system that allowed these mandates in the first place to retrace their steps and fix the damage is a pipe dream. We need to stand together and raise our voices against this new American oppression. Stop supporting businesses that require masks and vaccine passports. Stop supporting elected officials that were so swift in revoking your bodily autonomy.

It will be hard. It might affect your social life, your children’s schooling, or even your job. But freedom is never free. If we acquiesce to these mandates now, I promise you… it will only be the beginning.

 

To-late

Membership Revoked
I always thought Kavanaugh was a bad choice.
the man was a blubbering idiot on public media during the questioning for his SCOTUS POSITION,,,for crying out loud!
he has no grit!
 
Top