knickgnat
Veteran Member
U.S. Justice Department report concludes politics illegally affected hiring
By Eric Lichtblau Published: July 28, 2008
WASHINGTON: Senior aides to then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales broke the law by using politics to guide their hiring decisions for a wide range of important department positions, slowing the hiring process at critical times and damaging the department's credibility and independence, an internal report released Monday concludes.
The report, prepared by the Justice Department's inspector general and its internal ethics office, singles out for particular criticism Monica Goodling, a young lawyer from the Republican National Committee who rose quickly through the ranks of the department to become a top aide to Gonzales.
Goodling, who testified before Congress in May 2007 at the height of the scandal over the firings of nine United States attorneys, introduced politics into the hiring process in a systematic way that constituted illegal misconduct, the report says.
Last month, the inspector general, Glenn Fine, released a separate report that described a similar pattern of politicized hiring at the Justice Department in reviewing applications from young lawyers for the honors and intern programs. The report released Monday goes much further, however, in documenting pervasive evidence of political hiring for some of the department's most senior career, apolitical positions, including immigration judges and assistant U.S. attorneys.
The inspector general's investigation found that Goodling and a handful of other senior aides to Gonzales developed a system of using in-person interviews and Internet searches to screen out candidates who might be too liberal and to identify candidates seen as pro-Republican and supportive of President George W. Bush.
U.S. Justice Department report concludes politics illegally affected hiringU.S. needs more knowledge to deal with Iran
When interviewed by the inspector general, Gonzales said he was not aware that Goodling and other aides were using political criteria in their decisions for career positions. Gonzales resigned last summer in the face of mounting accusations from congressional Democrats that politics had corrupted the department.
His successor, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, said in a statement Monday after the report's release that he was disturbed by the findings that improper political considerations were used in hiring decisions relating to some career employees.
"I have said many times, both to members of the public and to department employees, it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees," he said. "And I have acted, and will continue to act, to ensure that my words are translated into reality so that the conduct described in this report does not occur again at the department."
He said that over the course of the past year and a half, the Justice Department had made institutional changes to remedy the problems discussed in the Monday report.
"It is crucial that the American people have confidence in the propriety of what we do and how we do it," he said, "and I will continue my efforts to make certain they can have such confidence."
An attorney for Goodling, John Dowd, did not return a telephone message Monday.
In her position as White House liaison for the Justice Department, Goodling was involved in hiring lawyers for both political appointments and non-political, career positions. Regardless of the type of position, the report says, Goodling would run through the same batch of questions, asking candidates about their political philosophies, why they wanted to serve Bush, and who, aside from Bush, they admired as public servants. Sometimes, Goodling would ask: "Why are you a Republican?"
Such questioning was allowed for candidates to political appointments, but was clearly banned under both civil service law and the Justice Department's internal policies, the inspector general said. Goodling's questioning also generated complaints from one senior official who believed it was improper, long before the issue became a public controversy following the firings of nine United States attorneys.
In one case, the report says, Goodling slowed the hiring of a prosecutor in the United States attorney's office in Washington for a vacancy because she said she was concerned that he was a "liberal Democrat."
In another case, colleagues said that Goodling refused to extend the appointment of a female prosecutor because she believed the lawyer was involved in a lesbian relationship with her supervisor, the report says. In a case cited by the inspector general, Goodling blocked the hiring of an experienced prosecutor for a senior counter-terrorism position because his wife was active in Democratic politics.
Goodling also conducted extensive searches on the Internet to glean the political or ideological leanings of candidates for career positions, the report says. She and other Justice Department supervisors would look for key phrases like "abortion," "homosexual," "guns," or "Florida re-count" to get information on a candidate's political leanings.
- So what are they going to do about it?
By Eric Lichtblau Published: July 28, 2008
WASHINGTON: Senior aides to then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales broke the law by using politics to guide their hiring decisions for a wide range of important department positions, slowing the hiring process at critical times and damaging the department's credibility and independence, an internal report released Monday concludes.
The report, prepared by the Justice Department's inspector general and its internal ethics office, singles out for particular criticism Monica Goodling, a young lawyer from the Republican National Committee who rose quickly through the ranks of the department to become a top aide to Gonzales.
Goodling, who testified before Congress in May 2007 at the height of the scandal over the firings of nine United States attorneys, introduced politics into the hiring process in a systematic way that constituted illegal misconduct, the report says.
Last month, the inspector general, Glenn Fine, released a separate report that described a similar pattern of politicized hiring at the Justice Department in reviewing applications from young lawyers for the honors and intern programs. The report released Monday goes much further, however, in documenting pervasive evidence of political hiring for some of the department's most senior career, apolitical positions, including immigration judges and assistant U.S. attorneys.
The inspector general's investigation found that Goodling and a handful of other senior aides to Gonzales developed a system of using in-person interviews and Internet searches to screen out candidates who might be too liberal and to identify candidates seen as pro-Republican and supportive of President George W. Bush.
U.S. Justice Department report concludes politics illegally affected hiringU.S. needs more knowledge to deal with Iran
When interviewed by the inspector general, Gonzales said he was not aware that Goodling and other aides were using political criteria in their decisions for career positions. Gonzales resigned last summer in the face of mounting accusations from congressional Democrats that politics had corrupted the department.
His successor, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, said in a statement Monday after the report's release that he was disturbed by the findings that improper political considerations were used in hiring decisions relating to some career employees.
"I have said many times, both to members of the public and to department employees, it is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career department employees," he said. "And I have acted, and will continue to act, to ensure that my words are translated into reality so that the conduct described in this report does not occur again at the department."
He said that over the course of the past year and a half, the Justice Department had made institutional changes to remedy the problems discussed in the Monday report.
"It is crucial that the American people have confidence in the propriety of what we do and how we do it," he said, "and I will continue my efforts to make certain they can have such confidence."
An attorney for Goodling, John Dowd, did not return a telephone message Monday.
In her position as White House liaison for the Justice Department, Goodling was involved in hiring lawyers for both political appointments and non-political, career positions. Regardless of the type of position, the report says, Goodling would run through the same batch of questions, asking candidates about their political philosophies, why they wanted to serve Bush, and who, aside from Bush, they admired as public servants. Sometimes, Goodling would ask: "Why are you a Republican?"
Such questioning was allowed for candidates to political appointments, but was clearly banned under both civil service law and the Justice Department's internal policies, the inspector general said. Goodling's questioning also generated complaints from one senior official who believed it was improper, long before the issue became a public controversy following the firings of nine United States attorneys.
In one case, the report says, Goodling slowed the hiring of a prosecutor in the United States attorney's office in Washington for a vacancy because she said she was concerned that he was a "liberal Democrat."
In another case, colleagues said that Goodling refused to extend the appointment of a female prosecutor because she believed the lawyer was involved in a lesbian relationship with her supervisor, the report says. In a case cited by the inspector general, Goodling blocked the hiring of an experienced prosecutor for a senior counter-terrorism position because his wife was active in Democratic politics.
Goodling also conducted extensive searches on the Internet to glean the political or ideological leanings of candidates for career positions, the report says. She and other Justice Department supervisors would look for key phrases like "abortion," "homosexual," "guns," or "Florida re-count" to get information on a candidate's political leanings.
- So what are they going to do about it?