VIDEO Is the US CAPABLE of Fighting WW III? Military Expert's WARNING

Henry Bowman

Veteran Member
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFFvxIlsRSM

RT 1:19:12
The Space Force may sound like something from a sci-fi movie, but it’s as real as every other branch of the military … maybe even as real as UFOs. On this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," Glenn talks to Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, the first Space Force veteran. As the commander of a space-based missile warning unit, he was disturbed by the military’s increasingly woke and Marxist agenda, and he decided to speak out and write a book, “Irresistible Revolution: Marxism's Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military.” But instead of listening, the military fired him. Now, with Putin’s finger near the red button and China sneering at Taiwan, Matt joins Glenn to sound the alarm: Did the U.S. bomb the Nord Stream pipeline? Did our woke military give Putin his greatest weapon? And are we even capable of fighting World War III? Plus, Matt shares his personal experience with a UFO.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
YES

YES

FIGHTING, YES. WINNING, NO.

I question that assessment.

The most likely combatants in WWIII are Russia and China. China is on its last legs. 75% of its water is not fit for human consumption.

Russia is STILL FIGHTING UKRAINE. After a year. Russia is several dozen times larger than Ukraine. The fact that Ukraine isn't a crater full of human blood right now suggests that Tovarisch Putin has bigger problems than you think.
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
I question that assessment.

The most likely combatants in WWIII are Russia and China. China is on its last legs. 75% of its water is not fit for human consumption.

Russia is STILL FIGHTING UKRAINE. After a year. Russia is several dozen times larger than Ukraine. The fact that Ukraine isn't a crater full of human blood right now suggests that Tovarisch Putin has bigger problems than you think.

Do you think WWIII will be conventional?
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
YES

YES

FIGHTING, YES. WINNING, NO.
Rather than saying NO about winning, I would say we just might win. But would come out of the fight grievously wounded. Do we survive as a nation afterwards is the question.

No way the next war doesn't see major attacks on the American homeland, unlike WWI and WWII. And the aftereffects of such attacks could be what spells America's demise.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Have we "won" any war since WW2?
Did we win in Iraq?
Did we win in Afghanistan?
We haven't fought a war like our lives depended on it since WWII. Everything since has been "Diplomacy By Force" at the direction of bureaucrats and politicians, not military leaders.

And you're right, since then we have not outright won a war, just fought the enemy to the point where there was a ceasefire at best.
 

ghost

Veteran Member
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFFvxIlsRSM

RT 1:19:12
The Space Force may sound like something from a sci-fi movie, but it’s as real as every other branch of the military … maybe even as real as UFOs. On this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," Glenn talks to Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, the first Space Force veteran. As the commander of a space-based missile warning unit, he was disturbed by the military’s increasingly woke and Marxist agenda, and he decided to speak out and write a book, “Irresistible Revolution: Marxism's Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military.” But instead of listening, the military fired him. Now, with Putin’s finger near the red button and China sneering at Taiwan, Matt joins Glenn to sound the alarm: Did the U.S. bomb the Nord Stream pipeline? Did our woke military give Putin his greatest weapon? And are we even capable of fighting World War III? Plus, Matt shares his personal experience with a UFO.
As long as the military is woke, marxist.
There will be NO REAL MILITARY.
Only, young boys and girls, not MEN an WOMEN.
Who are risking their lives for their Country, period.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
We haven't fought a war like our lives depended on it since WWII. Everything since has been "Diplomacy By Force" at the direction of bureaucrats and politicians, not military leaders.

And you're right, since then we have not outright won a war, just fought the enemy to the point where there was a ceasefire at best.
And let's not forget "managing the threat".....
 

Codeno

Veteran Member
Nobody will win the next war. There may be a cessation of hostilities here and there, regionally, or (supposedly) across the board, but nobody is going home with a trophy, and "peace" will be nothing more than a fool's dose of hopium.

What remains will be altogether unlike the aftermath of any previous war, and battles of personal survival will rule the day for many, becoming a lifestyle for the current victorious.

As he often does, Selco comes to mind.
 
Last edited:

Bud in Fla

Veteran Member
I didn't watch the video yet but it's been pretty obvious that FJB has been disarming the US as fast as he can. I guess he wants to make it easy for his owners when he ships them in!

I read that Ukraine is using ammo faster than it can be produced and shipped - and we, the US tax payers are footing the bill! I've also seen that even if we weren't paying for/supplying the ammo going to Ukraine, it would take about 6 years to bring the military stockpile of ammo/RPGs/missiles/etc back up to the proper levels.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
Fight?
Sure.
Win?
North Korea, Taiwan, Iran, Syria, China, Venezuela, Yemen, Sudan
Simultaneously?
Be fun to watch . . . From a remote mountain in Bolivia.

Wont make a bet on the outcome.
Will sit at the end of the bar drinking Mojitos, flirting with the bar maid, telling war stories. And listening to war stories.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Fight?
Sure.
Win?
North Korea, Taiwan, Iran, Syria, China, Venezuela, Yemen, Sudan
Simultaneously?
Be fun to watch . . . From a remote mountain in Bolivia.

Wont make a bet on the outcome.
Will sit at the end of the bar drinking Mojitos, flirting with the bar maid, telling war stories. And listening to war stories.
All depends upon the "limits" TPTB place upon themselves.

All that being said, IMHO we've been in WWIII since before 2001 and arguably since 1945, with only sporadic rises in activity and re-shufflings of the sides.
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I'm trying to find out where I read this but I understand that Russia has an underground tunnel system or shelter from any possible WW3 fallout that could hold up to almost 100 million people for 6 months................sound outrageous but if it is even close to that claim then the US has 0% of prep relative to that.

The US still leads in nuclear weapons stack piling over Russia by about 20% but has about a 30% deployable advantage while China has only a fraction of either stock pile with minimal nuclear warheads deployable........if we are to believe the "official" stats on that.

While the idea of a WW3 with the same approach to "creative destruction" as the previous two WWs is sheer insanity. I can't think of anyone behind all wars (the central banking elite and their puppet political/industrial military complex) would want something to eliminate about 90% of the population while leaving enough of the Earth's biosphere, resources and enough population intact to continue their reaping the benefits of what the planet has to offer would think that theater wide thermonuclear warfare is the solution for that.........

Seems to me that some form of biowarfare would accomplish that nicely if it didn't mutate into some form of what they have no antidote or.....and in that case they accomplish their goals just before the wipe out all of humanity including themselves.

Really the only way to accomplish what they want is to first become AI exclusive to the rest of humanity and then just eliminate carbon based humans from food sources or biological means which they would remain impervious to and then use other AI critters to do all the heavy lifting that they through 10 percent of the remaining carbon based humans could have done.

All this reminds me of a statement I read on a message board that haunts me........

"I love science but in the end it is going to extinct carbon based humanity"
 

ExCop

Veteran Member
A couple of thoughts:
With a one front war we might have a chance but bidet is provoking both Russia and China

If we still had flag and line officers with real battle experience, willing to lead instead of soy boy politicians hiding behind their desks. We might have had a chance

I am not even going to try and comment about what’s left in the ranks. The few real soldiers that are left should have never been put in the position they are now facing.

In the end I think “WE” will end up being the defensive line that will matter, as I do not see any way to derail this train before it gets to the station
 

Sundancer

Member
It is not about who will win.
They want all sides to destroy each other.
They the NWO, or TPTB or what ever title you want to
give them want to kill off all the people they consider
unnecessary. Think Georgia Guidestones.

The pandimic did not work. So war is the next try.
They will keep trying untill they achive their goals.
Then they will come out of their bunkers as the great
saviors they think they are.

They are not worried about war cause they have a place
to go. Both goverment and ultra rich. We do not have
shelters any more. Only if we make our own.
 

colonel holman

Veteran Member
Rather than saying NO about winning, I would say we just might win. But would come out of the fight grievously wounded. Do we survive as a nation afterwards is the question.

No way the next war doesn't see major attacks on the American homeland, unlike WWI and WWII. And the aftereffects of such attacks could be what spells America's demise.
Exactly. It will be a murder-suicide pact. Even very few successful hits in US mainland and EU will totally collapse society here and there. One small, even terrorist-level, nuke blast in one major US city will collapse so many political underpinnings as to permanently alter US (note how 9/11 altered US).

Russian intercontinental war-fighting effectiveness could be even much worse as its conventional war-fighting effectiveness, but they only need to get 5-10 nukes on target to collapse our world as we know it here and in EU. Russian society being relatively more “primitive” and widely-dispersed and with better civil defense would fare better, but will still collapse. True outcome would take about a year to determine. Pockets of highly dysfunctional tribes would be all that survive
 

colonel holman

Veteran Member
A demonstration blast over the Black Sea or elsewhere is one thing, but when someone pops a tactical nuke on humans in the current hotspot will pull the pin on nuke hostilities, going worldwide within a very few days.
Russia hits Kiev or a front line target with a low-yield blast… NATO hits back with conventional strike on Black Sea fleet, no-fly hostilities over Uke, any and all ground forces massed within Uke, even avoiding strikes on masses in Belarus or within Russian border regions… will lead to Russian strikes on EU/NATO command and border-massed forces, using tact Nukes as their only effective delivery of force.

If we are lucky, Russia may at that point demand an immediate declaration of a halt to hostilities or else they will overwhelmingly hit EU and US within in their home countries. US and EU may at that point comply and agree to step back from the edge… or not. US may say hell no, while EU may beg for compliance with the Russian offer, totally fracturing NATO (a long-time Russian strategic objective)

That would be about the time other players take advantage. China vs Taiwan, India vs China, NK vs SK and local US forces/Japan, Iran vs Saudi, Israel vs Iran and Lebanon/Syria/Gaza. The full definition of a World War.
 

hiwall

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Just think about one or two strikes on US soil.
1. Half the US population would wonder if our own gov did it.
2. Before the dust settled our gov would impose martial law across the nation.
Life here would Never be the same.
 

Henry Bowman

Veteran Member
Before we take on China or Russia, we need to go to war and get rid of the globalists/socialists/Satanists running our government.
Now thats just crazy talk. Why how would that look to the rest of the world if we did such a thing and ruin all of the wonderful opportunities for the Military Industrial Complex?

Besides we have everything we need here and our Government only has our best interest at heart.
( Almost got through that with a straight face LOL )

Bet ya someone will come up with a million excuses , just as bad as those I sighted and then tell you to do it first.
 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Before we continue combat, or further, go to the war of this thread, we must do the most important thing of all-

2 Chronicles 7:14
King James Version

14 “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”

Unless the Lord be within, or approval of our efforts and actions, we court defeat. In all this international strum und drang, where is God? Have we sought Him, and His approval and assistance?

You answer that. I already know the answer, and to those who are honest, who are in Christ Jesus, you know too.

Even so, Come quickly, Lord Jesus!

OA
 

Henry Bowman

Veteran Member
Before we continue combat, or further, go to the war of this thread, we must do the most important thing of all-

2 Chronicles 7:14
King James Version

14 “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”

Unless the Lord be within, or approval of our efforts and actions, we court defeat. In all this international strum und drang, where is God? Have we sought Him, and His approval and assistance?

You answer that. I already know the answer, and to those who are honest, who are in Christ Jesus, you know too.

Even so, Come quickly, Lord Jesus!

OA
Curious as to what Answer you got.

Not to thread drift If ok I will PM you.
 
Top