WAR Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki: Schedule US Withdrawal

FarmerJohn

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki seems to be coming to a position close to that of presidential candidate Barak Obama and moving away from that of John McCain.

FJ

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- A short-term memorandum of understanding setting down a coalition troop withdrawal schedule has emerged as a key option in the U.S.-Iraqi security talks.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, speaking in Abu Dhabi, said his government is favoring a short-term accord. His comments come as frustrated negotiators have been working on a long-term bilateral pact that would cover security.

"Now we are trying to reach a memorandum of understanding either to end the presence of the troops or a memorandum of understanding to reschedule their withdrawal," al-Maliki said, according to his press office in Baghdad.

Iraq and the United States have been negotiating strategic framework and status-of-forces agreements that will spell out their relationship in security and other areas.

The U.S.-Iraq security relationship has been the most critical aspect of discussions because it will set down rules governing the conduct of American forces in Iraq.

Al-Maliki reiterated on Monday that the underlying aim of the agreement is the "full sovereignty of Iraq."

A U.N. mandate that sets down the parameters for U.S.-led coalition forces in Iraq expires at the end of the year. The United States wants to forge an agreement by the end of July.

Don't Miss
Three killed in Iraq bombings
UAE to cancel Iraqi debt
Last week, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari broached the idea of a memorandum of understanding.

He said that a security agreement outlining the relationship between the United States and Iraq is "reachable" and believes the Americans have been showing much "flexibility" in the talks.

He said he was hopeful that the status of forces pact, setting down a legal framework for the activities of U.S. troops, will be reached by the end of July.

But Zebari said there were other options if a status of forces agreement couldn't be reached.

They would include "an interim arrangement until the SOFA negotiation is completed through protocol, through a memorandum of understanding between the two governments or to go back to the Security Council at the end of the year and ask for another extension," he said.

Zebari said progress has been made in one aspect of the deal: Private security contractors working in Iraq would no longer receive immunity from prosecution there.

The American delegation in the negotiations has shown "a great deal of flexibility" on immunity issues for military personnel and civilians who work for the military, on the detainment of Iraqi citizens and on the authorization of U.S. military operations, Zebari said.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/07/iraq.security/index.html
 

kozanne

Inactive
I think it has very very little to do with our internal politics, really. Iraq thinks they are ready to stand on their own, I'm sure America will do whatever it can to make that happen. Which is what we've been doing anyway.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I guess McBush forgot to ask Iraq about his plans for the US staying there for 100 years.

If they get this to a done deal before the conventions, including a redo of the deployment schedules to reflect it, it should make for interesting fodder for the Sunday talking heads shows...but then likely as not those troops will be rotating into Afghanistan or even Pakistan next.

When the draw down plan is announced, I'd expect it to include the U.S. being responsible for policing Iraqi airspace for a considerable period of time, so the FOBs at the major former Iraqi AFBs like H2 will remain for a long time along with the radars to do that. (Recall the problem with BMD radars in eastern Europe, smaller units in Iraq, along with a couple of batteries of THAADs and F-15 CAPs carrying PAC3s render that moot with regards to Iran at a minimum.)

I'd also expect to see a long term presence of trainers, and probably 5 brigades worth of U.S./Coalition forces, and SF units in strategic locations to act as a buffer/stiffener a la West Germany or South Korea for a long period of time.
 

Kendo

Senior Member
If anyone thinks Maliki is calling the shots over there, I've got a bridge to sell you.

I believe he was told to do this as it takes the "hot potato" off McCain's plate. Troop withdrawal will become a mute point and McCain doesn't have to flip flop.

Obama loses one of his big bullets to use on McCain.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
If anyone thinks Maliki is calling the shots over there, I've got a bridge to sell you.

I believe he was told to do this as it takes the "hot potato" off McCain's plate. Troop withdrawal will become a mute point and McCain doesn't have to flip flop.

Obama loses one of his big bullets to use on McCain.

Heck, I'm glad to see that somebody is finally reading his Sun Tzu, Tacitus, Machiavelli, Khaldun and or Bismark. As long as the UN recognized government signs on to this with the "Coalition" and starts to make it work, that's great as far as I'm concerned; one less major problem, though it will remain a "minor one" for quite a long time.
 

Worrier King

Deceased
Bush Juniors invasion has potentially created a Shia superstate that runs from Iran to Afghanistan.

Those guys ain't gonna dick around like the dems/repubs have.
 
Top