WAR Iraq-IS War (30 March 2016) Obama to decide on increasing troop levels in Iraq soon

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Figured I'd better start a new thread for this part of the MENA mess just to keep things as clear as possible since this side of it is now apparently heating up.... Housecarl

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-iraq-idUSKCN0WW2IF

Politics | Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:11pm EDT
Related: World, Election 2016, Politics, Iraq

Obama could decide on greater troop presence in Iraq soon: general

WASHINGTON

President Barack Obama will have the chance to decide on whether to increase the number of U.S. forces in Iraq in the "coming weeks," the top U.S. general said on Wednesday.

The extra troops would bolster the capabilities of Iraqi forces preparing for a major offensive against the Islamic State militant group in Mosul, U.S. Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a news briefing.

U.S. and Iraqi military officials have been discussing a plan to retake Mosul, which fell to Islamic State in June 2014, and how U.S. forces could support their efforts, Dunford said.

"Those recommendations are being made and the president will have an opportunity to make some decisions here in the coming weeks," Dunford said. "I brought it to the secretary (Defense Secretary Ash Carter). The secretary will engage with the president."

Dunford said last week he expected an increase in the level of U.S. forces in Iraq from the current 3,800, but that those decisions had not been finalized.

U.S. officials have said they hope to capitalize on recent battlefield successes against Islamic State, such as the retaking of Ramadi by Iraqi forces late last year.

"The timing really now is focused on the next phase of the campaign, which is towards Mosul, and maintaining the kind of momentum that we had in Ramadi," Dunford said.

(Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati; Editing by Peter Cooney)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://news.antiwar.com/2016/03/29/...ul-collapsing-in-the-face-of-mass-desertions/

Iraq’s Offensive Near Mosul Collapsing in the Face of Mass Desertions

Locals Accuse Army of Looting Early in Offensive

by Jason Ditz, March 29, 2016

Less than a week ago, Iraqi officials were touting a new military offensive against some villages near Mosul as a major sign of progress in the war against ISIS, and their success in taking three villages was proof of ISIS being “in retreat.”

Today that offensive is stalled outright, on the brink of collapse, as low morale has many Iraqi troops leaving their positions, with Kurdish officials who were involved in the fighting saying the army “have no will to fight.”

The Kurds are in a position to know, as they hold a checkpoint between the villages and Shi’ite territory, and have been stopping deserters en masse, detaining those they can but ultimately watching as their key allies ditch the battle.

US officials are downplaying the concerns, insisting that the Iraqi troops are performing up to expectations. Locals are complaining that the troops showed up, looted their villages, and then just left, insisting they are no better than ISIS.

Looting and sectarian unrest are old problems, however, and the real problem is that this force of thousands of Iraqi troops is supposed to be the one taking over the heavily guarded city of Mosul. If they can’t even handle the villages, that Mosul offensive is far, far out of reach.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Crawl on the teevee snooze said something about troop movement this afternoon.
==============

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-station-armored-brigade-eastern-europe-2017-151922715.html

US to station armored brigade in Eastern Europe: Pentagon

Thomas Watkins


AFP

March 30, 2016

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe

View photos

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb)
More

Washington (AFP) - The United States will step up its troop presence in Eastern Europe in response to "an aggressive Russia" by deploying an additional armored brigade, the US military said Wednesday.

Continuous rotations of the brigade beginning in early 2017 will bring the US Army's presence in Europe to three fully manned combat brigades, the US European Command said. A brigade comprises about 4,200 troops.

"This army implementation plan continues to demonstrate our strong and balanced approach to reassuring our NATO allies and partners in the wake of an aggressive Russia in Eastern Europe and elsewhere," General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe, said in a statement.

"Our allies and partners will see more capability," he added. "They will see a more frequent presence of an armored brigade with more modernized equipment in their countries."

Defense Secretary Ash Carter last month unveiled the Pentagon's proposed budget for next year, which includes $3.4 billion -- quadruple last year's amount -- for operations in Europe.

The cash will fund the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, which aims to deter Russia from carrying out additional land grabs after its 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"These efforts demonstrate strong alliances and partnerships backed by demonstrated capability, capacity and readiness to deter aggression," Pentagon spokeswoman Laura Seal said.

"We have been clear that we will defend our interests, our allies and the principles of international order in Europe."

- Equipment upgrades -

The Pentagon's beefed-up European presence means US forces will increase military exercises with ally countries and train with new equipment.

An armored brigade combat team includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

Each armored brigade will be deployed for nine months and bring its own gear.

Equipment already in the region will be repaired and upgraded, then stored in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, the military said.

Eastern European leaders welcomed the move.

Latvian Defense Minister Raimonds Bergmanis said the deployment bears out commitments made by President Barack Obama in a speech in the Estonian capital Tallinn in September 2014.

"This decision is particularly important after President Obama's statement," he said.

"Then, the US president said that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius are just as important to protect as Berlin, Paris and London."

Russia has repeatedly warned against the permanent positioning of substantial forces from NATO along its border.

And some NATO members, like Germany, have been skeptical about any substantial permanent deployment, saying it could breach a 1997 agreement between the military alliance and Russia.

But the new US deployment avoids the issue because it is not technically permanently stationed in Eastern Europe, with brigades rotating in and out, US officials say.

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has been supporting a pro-Moscow separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine.

The US military has about 62,000 permanently assigned service members in Europe.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.euronews.com/2016/03/30/...ensive-as-iraq-appeals-for-help-against-isil/

Front line view of Mosul offensive as Iraq appeals for help against ISIL

30/03 22:21 CET | updated 015:47 mn ago

The Iraqi government has appealed for more international help to liberate the country’s second-largest city Mosul from the clutches of the self-styled Islamic State organisation.

Last week Iraqi forces announced a much-awaited offensive, assisted by Kurdish Peshmerga forces and US advisors.

The defence minister has denied reports that US-led foreign troops are taking part in the operation.

US media had reported that American ground troops had been dispatched to assist Iraqi forces.

Euronews saw at first hand the Iraqi visit of the minister, Khaled al-Obeidi, to the army front line around Makhmour some 60 kilometres to the south of Mosul.

He told our correspondent US air strikes were very important, providing cover for the ground operation. But he added, more help was required.

“This battle needs more serious support not only from Europe but from all the world. The danger from Daesh threatens the whole world – what happened in Brussels and Paris recently is a very clear sign of that – and this will happen again in other countries, so my message to the Europeans is that the risk from Daesh is not only military, it’s ideological as well,” al-Obeidi said.

Retaking Mosul will be key to defeating the extremists; the offensive is expected to last several months. Progress is said to have been slow; a number of villages have been taken by the army but others remain under ISIL control.

In addition, tensions have been reported between Peshmerga and Iraqi forces, some of whom fled the area when ISIL moved into the area in June 2014.

Euronews correspondent Mohammed Shaikhibrahim reported from Makhmour:
“Today we succeeded in reaching one of the Iraqi army’s front lines to witness part of their tough war against Daesh. Military sources told us the operation will develop in the coming days especially from the technological and tactical side, and the number of soldiers (is expected to increase) as well.”

-----

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.euronews.com/2016/03/30/iraq-on-the-frontline-with-isil-fighting-peshmerga-forces/

Iraq: On the frontline with ISIL-fighting Peshmerga forces

30/03 16:15 CET | updated 016:26 mn ago
Euronews correspondent Mohamed Shaikhibrahim has been embedded with the Kurdish Peshmerga Forces in their push to retake Mosul.

He was with the company of soldiers at a military camp just 1.5 kilometres from the jihadist fighters from where they prepared to engage them. It is known as “Sultan Abdullah Barrack”.

It is close to Sultan Abdullah, which lies south-east of the city. It is one of a cluster of villages which have to be cleared of the so-called Islamic State before the offensive on Mosul.

This is one of the most important military fronts for the Peshmerga but so far the troops have been frustrated in their efforts to liberate the village.

The battles are mostly at night. In daylight the Peshmerga forces monitor from afar, opening fire on any suspicious movements among the buildings which are now empty of civilians.

ISIL have built a maze of tunnels to move from one house to another. They have laid booby traps around the village to prevent a surprise attack. They claim ISIL is using chemical weapons.

“In the presence of international experts we have recorded the fact this site was bombed with chemical weapons and poisonous gases on more than four occasions,” Brigadier Mohammed Assad Peshmerga Forces told Mohamed Shaikhibrahim.

“The worst of these attacks was last year by shells with deadly chemicals in them. We also found landmines with chemicals which we dismantled preventing hundreds of soldiers from being killed.”

It was not far from here that an attack by ISIL using mustard gas was confirmed.

That was last August. There were no fatalities but fears persist the militants will continue to use the weapons which have the potential to cause massive injuries and that they will become more sophisticated in their use.

Chemical weapons are banned under an international treaty signed after their lethal use in World War 1.

The Peshmerga troops have been able to retake many of the villages surrounding Mosul. Their targets now are to keep control of the borders and provide back up for the Iraqi troops advancing on the city.

Mohammed Shaikhibrahim reported: “Sultan Abdullah is considered one of the main military barracks from which to attack and this is the reason why so many of the Peshmerga elite forces are stationed here. It is also a sensitive transit point between Kirkuk, Erbil and Mosul cities.”
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Crawl on the teevee snooze said something about troop movement this afternoon.
==============

https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-station-armored-brigade-eastern-europe-2017-151922715.html

US to station armored brigade in Eastern Europe: Pentagon

Thomas Watkins


AFP

March 30, 2016

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe

View photos

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb)
More

Washington (AFP) - The United States will step up its troop presence in Eastern Europe in response to "an aggressive Russia" by deploying an additional armored brigade, the US military said Wednesday.

Continuous rotations of the brigade beginning in early 2017 will bring the US Army's presence in Europe to three fully manned combat brigades, the US European Command said. A brigade comprises about 4,200 troops.

"This army implementation plan continues to demonstrate our strong and balanced approach to reassuring our NATO allies and partners in the wake of an aggressive Russia in Eastern Europe and elsewhere," General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe, said in a statement.

"Our allies and partners will see more capability," he added. "They will see a more frequent presence of an armored brigade with more modernized equipment in their countries."

Defense Secretary Ash Carter last month unveiled the Pentagon's proposed budget for next year, which includes $3.4 billion -- quadruple last year's amount -- for operations in Europe.

The cash will fund the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, which aims to deter Russia from carrying out additional land grabs after its 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"These efforts demonstrate strong alliances and partnerships backed by demonstrated capability, capacity and readiness to deter aggression," Pentagon spokeswoman Laura Seal said.

"We have been clear that we will defend our interests, our allies and the principles of international order in Europe."

- Equipment upgrades -

The Pentagon's beefed-up European presence means US forces will increase military exercises with ally countries and train with new equipment.

An armored brigade combat team includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

Each armored brigade will be deployed for nine months and bring its own gear.

Equipment already in the region will be repaired and upgraded, then stored in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, the military said.

Eastern European leaders welcomed the move.

Latvian Defense Minister Raimonds Bergmanis said the deployment bears out commitments made by President Barack Obama in a speech in the Estonian capital Tallinn in September 2014.

"This decision is particularly important after President Obama's statement," he said.

"Then, the US president said that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius are just as important to protect as Berlin, Paris and London."

Russia has repeatedly warned against the permanent positioning of substantial forces from NATO along its border.

And some NATO members, like Germany, have been skeptical about any substantial permanent deployment, saying it could breach a 1997 agreement between the military alliance and Russia.

But the new US deployment avoids the issue because it is not technically permanently stationed in Eastern Europe, with brigades rotating in and out, US officials say.

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has been supporting a pro-Moscow separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine.

The US military has about 62,000 permanently assigned service members in Europe.

Yeah, effectively they're sending in an understrength division scattered over the whole eastern part of NATO. Meanwhile they've got at least 17,000 "youths" in just one of those Muslim dominated neighborhoods in Brussels they said this morning with a 50% unemployment rate.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-station-armored-brigade-eastern-europe-2017-151922715.html

US to station armored brigade in Eastern Europe: Pentagon

AFP

March 30, 2016

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe

View photos
General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb)
More

Washington (AFP) - The United States will step up its troop presence in Eastern Europe in response to "an aggressive Russia" by deploying an additional armored brigade, the US military said Wednesday.

Continuous rotations of the brigade beginning in early 2017 will bring the US Army's presence in Europe to three fully manned combat brigades, the US European Command said. A brigade comprises about 4,200 troops.

"This army implementation plan continues to demonstrate our strong and balanced approach to reassuring our NATO allies and partners in the wake of an aggressive Russia in Eastern Europe and elsewhere," General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe, said in a statement.

"Our allies and partners will see more capability," he added. "They will see a more frequent presence of an armored brigade with more modernized equipment in their countries."

Defense Secretary Ash Carter last month unveiled the Pentagon's proposed budget for next year, which includes $3.4 billion -- quadruple last year's amount -- for operations in Europe.

The cash will fund the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, which aims to deter Russia from carrying out additional land grabs after its 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"These efforts demonstrate strong alliances and partnerships backed by demonstrated capability, capacity and readiness to deter aggression," Pentagon spokeswoman Laura Seal said.

"We have been clear that we will defend our interests, our allies and the principles of international order in Europe."

- Equipment upgrades -

The Pentagon's beefed-up European presence means US forces will increase military exercises with ally countries and train with new equipment.

An armored brigade combat team includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

Each armored brigade will be deployed for nine months and bring its own gear.

Equipment already in the region will be repaired and upgraded, then stored in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, the military said.

Eastern European leaders welcomed the move.

Latvian Defense Minister Raimonds Bergmanis said the deployment bears out commitments made by President Barack Obama in a speech in the Estonian capital Tallinn in September 2014.

"This decision is particularly important after President Obama's statement," he said.

"Then, the US president said that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius are just as important to protect as Berlin, Paris and London."

Russia has repeatedly warned against the permanent positioning of substantial forces from NATO along its border.

And some NATO members, like Germany, have been skeptical about any substantial permanent deployment, saying it could breach a 1997 agreement between the military alliance and Russia.

But the new US deployment avoids the issue because it is not technically permanently stationed in Eastern Europe, with brigades rotating in and out, US officials say.

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has been supporting a pro-Moscow separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine.

The US military has about 62,000 permanently assigned service members in Europe.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Haidar Sumeri ‏@IraqiSecurity 29m
Terrible weather is hampering the advance of #Iraq's forces
in multiple ops (Ninawa - central Anbar - Salahuddin).
Ce1FQLcW8AA70oy.jpg


Ce1FQLjWIAAfKm5.jpg


Ce1FQLuWIAAAitJ.jpg
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...aken-up-by-offensive-airstrikes/3171459251444

Islamic State in Mosul seemingly shaken up by offensive, airstrikes

By Andrew V. Pestano Follow @AVPLive9 Contact the Author | March 29, 2016 at 11:02 AM

BAGHDAD, March 29 (UPI) -- As the Iraqi offensive prepares to launch a full-scale assault to retake the city of Mosul, the Islamic State has reacted by executing members and removing local leaders from power.

Dozens of IS militants, including leaders, have fled from the militant Islamist organization and from Mosul, ARA News reported. The Islamic State in Mosul is reportedly in a state of alert, particularly as U.S.-led coalition airstrikes against IS targets have increased ahead of a ground offensive by the Iraqi army -- potentially supported by Kurdish Peshmerga troops and a Shiite-dominated paramilitary force.

The Islamic State has also executed at least 12 relatives of IS militants who previously worked in the group's intelligence agency in Mosul.

The Iraqi military began its offensive to retake Mosul by isolating the city from surrounding areas, which has displaced more than 500 families south of Mosul.

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Fadel al-Gharawi said the displacement of families as the Mosul offensive continues could potentially create a humanitarian disaster in the province.

Since U.S. coalition began airstrikes against IS targets in August 2014, nearly 7,500 airstrikes have been conducted in Iraq and nearly 3,700 have been launched in Syria. The Islamic State -- also identified as Daesh, ISIS and ISIL -- in June 2014 seized control of Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city with a population of about 2 million.

Col. Naji Bedaroni, a Peshmerga commander, said that although his fighters receive help from airstrikes, his troops are not supported with U.S. military equipment like the Iraqi army receives.

"The operation is very weak. It's not strong enough. I believe that if the Peshmerga had the equipment [the Iraqis] have, we could liberate this village in three to four hours, not three to four days," Bedaroni told PBS News , adding that the Iraqi government needs to make a political decision on whether it will decide to ask the Peshmerga to join in the formal ground assault in Mosul.

"That area that is being targeted for this operation is not a Kurdish area. We are just guarding our bunkers. If we get orders, for sure we can do that, but, until now, we have not gotten any orders," Bedaroni said.

The offensive was previously suspended due to bad weather. Officials said they hope to completely seize the land within a year, but it is unclear if Iraqi forces have the ability to do so.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Barbara Starr Verified account ‏@barbarastarrcnn
Iraq Fire Base Bell quietly renamed by DOD
“Kara Soar Counter Fire Complex”
USMC Staff Sgt Louis Cardin KIA @ Fire Base Bell.
#NeverForget

2:34 PM - 30 Mar 2016
Thomas Gibbons-Neff ‏@Tmgneff 1h
Phewf, for a second there I thought we were actually at war.


Thomas Gibbons-Neff ‏@Tmgneff 1h
"What did you do in Iraq pa?"
"I spent 8 months conducting force protection operations
in a non-combat operation at a counter-fire complex."




Marines in Iraq technically not in combat
but still getting some


Jeff Schogol, Marine Corps Times
12:13 p.m. EDT March 25, 2016
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/sto...y-not-combat-but-still-getting-some/82250236/

635944991622541389-MAR-Marines-Iraq-4.JPG

(Photo: Cpl. Andre Dakis/Marine Corps)

Who says there are no U.S. combat troops in Iraq?
From their newly established firebase at Makhmour, Marines are providing
artillery support for both U.S. and Iraqi forces in the run up to the Iraqi
offensive to retake Mosul from Islamic State terrorists.

About 700 Marines are serving in Iraq, of which between 100 and 200
Marines and sailors from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit are assigned
to Task Force Spartan at Firebase Bell, according to the task force
in charge of the war against the Islamic State group.

MARINE CORPS TIMES
U.S. Marines report second attack on 'Firebase Bell' in northern Iraq
The base has come under attack at least twice. Staff Sgt. Louis Cardin
was killed by a Katyusha rocket March 19. Two days later, devil dogs
at the firebase repelled an attack from a squad-sized element of Islamic
State terrorists.
635945013317715058-Marines-in-Iraq.jpg

Cpl. Jordan Crupper, an artilleryman,

and Sgt. Onesimos Utey, an artillery section chief,
both with Task Force Spartan,
26th Marine Expeditionary Unit,
prepare an Excalibur 155mm round.
(Photo: Marine Corps)
"Two enemy killed in that operation, the rest ran away in fear,"
Army Col. Steve Warren, a spokesman for Combined Joint Task Force
Operation Inherent Resolve, told reporters March 21.

The Marine Corps has released pictures of members of Task Force Spartan
firing an M777A2 howitzer at an Islamic State infiltration route March 18.

"The Marines fired upon the enemy infiltration routes in order to disrupt
their freedom of movement and ability to attack Kurdish and Peshmerga
forces," the picture's caption said.

Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
repeatedly brushed aside on Friday questions from reporters who asked
if Marines are now engaged in combat with the Islamic State group.

"From my perspective, this is no different than aviation fires we've been
delivering," Dunford said at a news conference at the Pentagon.
"This happens to be surface fires, or artillery, but certainly no different
conceptually from the fire support we've provided to the Iraqis all along."

When one reporter said the Marines' mission at Firebase Bell appeared
to be more of a ground combat role than the U.S. has engaged in thus
far in Iraq, Dunford replied: "No it's not. We have surface fires in Al Asad
[Air Base] and other places, as an example, and we've used those in the
past. So this is not a fundamental shift in our approach to support the
Iraqi forces. This happens to be what was the most appropriate tool that
the commander assessed needed to be in that particular location."

The base's location was selected to support forces in Makhmour, Dunford
explained. The artillery needed to be located separately from the Iraqis
in order to provide effective fire support to ground forces, he said.

"This position is behind what's known as the 'forward line of troops,'
for the Peshmerga and the Kurds," Dunford said. "So it's by no means
out in front on its own."

Dunford said that both he and Defense Secretary Ash Carter expect that
the U.S. will provide the Iraqis with "increased capabilities ... to set the
conditions for their operations in Mosul," but he declined to say what
type of assistance the Iraqis might receive.

"Those decisions haven't been made yet, but we certainly do expect
more of the kinds of things that we saw in Ramadi, albeit a bit
different, tailored for operations in Mosul, but again, the primary force
fighting in Mosul will be Iraqi security forces and we'll be in a position
to provide advise-and-assist and enabling capabilities to make them
successful."


 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-hit-idUSKCN0WX0WP

World | Thu Mar 31, 2016 5:07am EDT
Related: World

Iraqi forces advance towards western town held by Islamic State

BAGHDAD

Iraq's counter-terrorism forces backed by army troops and U.S.-led coalition air strikes advanced towards the western town of Hit on Thursday in an attempt to dislodge Islamic State militants, the military said.

A senior officer from the counter-terrorism forces, the elite U.S.-trained units which led the recapture of nearby Ramadi three months ago, said his troops were one kilometer from the town center, 130 km (80 miles) west of the capital Baghdad.

The recapture of Hit, strategically located on the Euphrates River near Ain al-Asad air base where several hundred U.S. forces are training Iraqi army troops, would push Islamic State further west towards the Syrian border, cutting a connection to the northern town of Samarra and leaving Falluja their only stronghold near the capital.

Baghdad has had success in pushing back the militants in recent months and has pledged to retake the northern city of Mosul later this year, but progress has often been fitful.

Another officer, on a frontline less than 3 km from Hit, said the operation had begun at 0600 (0300 GMT) and was progressing swiftly.

"There are some IEDs along the movement but it's still good to go and we are moving," he said by phone.

In a statement announcing the advance, the military said the offensive was backed by airstrikes from the Iraqi army and air force as well as the international coalition fighting Islamic State in the areas of Iraq and neighboring Syria where the militants declared a "caliphate" in 2014.

The statement called on civilians in Hit, thought to number in the tens of thousands, to move away from Islamic State positions: "Those targets will be destroyed".

The jihadists have regularly used civilians as human shields, a tactic aimed at slowing the advance of Iraqi forces and complicating air strikes essential to the ground advance.


(Reporting By Stephen Kalin; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I came across this short You Tube while looking for a "how it works" video for the M-777ER thread.....


Iraqi Popular Mobilization Units Sniper kills 173 ISIS fighters - Abu Tahseen 5 war veteran

Iraq Popular Mobilization Units Media - English
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sInofrqKhH4

Published on Dec 27, 2015

Abu Tahseen joined the Popular Mobilization Units as a volunteer to defend Iraq from ISIS. He as born in 1953. He is a sniper veteran of 5 armed conflicts. The Yom Kippur war, Iran-Iraq war, Invasion of Kuwait, Gulf War and today fights against ISIS. He is currently stationed at Makhoul Mountains in North Baiji. Since May 2015 he has killed 173 ISIS fighters.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-31/us-officially-locked-into-another-middle-east-war

U.S. Officially Locked Into Another Middle East War

A new medal and the potential for more troops to fight the Islamic State group elevate the U.S. fight to a new level.

By Paul D. Shinkman
March 31, 2016, at 11:55 a.m.

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Florida – The war against the Islamic State group, which President Barack Obama has insisted will not become another protracted U.S. ground conflict in the Middle East, adopted a new air of permanence here this week, with a top defense official suggesting the number of Americans deployed to Iraq and Syria soon may increase.

Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week he and Defense Secretary Ash Carter had agreed the U.S. should increase its military presence in Iraq – officially capped at 3,870 troops but with an actual tally of around 5,000.

On Wednesday, Dunford said President Barack Obama may make that decision very soon.

[READ: Iraqi Officials: Battle for Mosul Has Begun]

"I brought it to the secretary, the secretary will engage with the president on what the president has asked us to do, which is to come to him with ideas that will allow us to maintain that momentum," Dunford told reporters here after change-of-command ceremonies for U.S. Central Command and U.S. Special Operations Command. "Those recommendations are being made, and the president will have an opportunity to make some decisions here in the coming weeks."

The momentum Dunford referenced now centers on the Iraqi military's offensive to retake the key city of Mosul, which saw a shaky start amid reports of desertions and disorganization in the face of an entrenched enemy. Defense officials have dismissed these reports as little more than the usual battle tempo at the beginning of a campaign.

The Iraqi strategy involves the army's partnering with fighting groups like the Shiite Muslim-dominated militias known as the Popular Mobilization Units, or PMUs, and the Kurdish peshmerga. But this task, much larger and more complex than retaking Ramadi at the end of last year, will require increased Western firepower and support, defense officials say.

Symbolically, this conflict – which began without a name – has now secured its place in American war history, with Carter announcing Wednesday the creation of a new medal to award to troops taking part in the war against the Islamic State group.

Those who have served in Iraq and Syria for 30 consecutive days or 60 days total, or those who have been wounded, killed or engaged in combat against terrorist groups in the the two countries, can now be awarded the Inherent Resolve Campaign Medal.

Carter announced the new medal during the change-of-command ceremony for MacDill-based U.S. Central Command, shortly after the White House affirmed its creation through an executive action. Troops participating in this conflict had previously received the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, which they will still get for contributions to the conflict outside Iraq and Syria, such as those based in Qatar or Jordan.

Carter said the medal comes at a fitting time for U.S. military forces as they continue to accelerate their campaign against the Islamic State group.

The design of the medal itself drips with symbolism for U.S. goals in the region, as it features a chain mail-clad hand impaling a scorpion with a dagger. "A scorpion is a symbol for treachery and destructive forces," a Defense Department description of the new award says.

On the medal's reverse side is an eagle surrounded by an Arabian star design. It hangs on a ribbon of blue, teal, sand and orange, inspired by colors of the the Ishtar Gate from the ancient city of Babylon. A version of the gate has been reconstructed and put on display at the Pergamon Museum in Berlin.

Carter, Dunford, and other top military officials, including Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, came to MacDill to oversee a notable transition of America's combat leaders – one that represents the shift in the way this White House has prioritized waging war.

U.S. Army Gen. Joseph Votel – whose career has included leading the elite 75th Ranger Regiment in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more recently leading U.S. Special Operations Command, or SOCOM – took over Central Command. The command, which oversees all U.S. war efforts in the Middle East, is considered one of the most dynamic and complicated combat positions in the military.

Votel inherited the job from Army Gen. Lloyd Austin, whose extensive experience in airborne and infantry units yielded a more traditional match for a major combat command.

[ALSO: Marine’s Death Reveals More Americans in Iraq Than Previously Thought]

Votel, meanwhile, ceded his former charge to Army Gen. Raymond "Tony" Thomas, who like Votel has run the shadowy Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC, which manages the military's most secretive yet increasingly chronicled units, like the Army's Delta Force and the Navy's SEAL Team Six.

The methodical advancement of experienced special operators across the military's chain of command emphasizes the extent to which the White House relies on these shadowy commandos to train allies and carry out operations in secret, and Thomas on Wednesday reaffirmed the need to maintain that secrecy in war.

"There's a balance there, and certainly, the American public have a need to know what we're doing and that we're doing it in the right way, consistent with American values," he told reporters. But, he added, "we've had a rash of true-name disclosures here recently, which I don't see serving any purpose other than to put those people in jeopardy."
 

Border Guns

Veteran Member
I guess the Marines here at Camp Pendleton are not waiting on Bams. Shipping out next week. Don't know any numbers.
 

y2ksurvivor

Veteran Member
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://news.antiwar.com/2016/03/29/...ul-collapsing-in-the-face-of-mass-desertions/

Iraq’s Offensive Near Mosul Collapsing in the Face of Mass Desertions

Locals Accuse Army of Looting Early in Offensive

by Jason Ditz, March 29, 2016

Less than a week ago, Iraqi officials were touting a new military offensive against some villages near Mosul as a major sign of progress in the war against ISIS, and their success in taking three villages was proof of ISIS being “in retreat.”

Today that offensive is stalled outright, on the brink of collapse, as low morale has many Iraqi troops leaving their positions, with Kurdish officials who were involved in the fighting saying the army “have no will to fight.”

The Kurds are in a position to know, as they hold a checkpoint between the villages and Shi’ite territory, and have been stopping deserters en masse, detaining those they can but ultimately watching as their key allies ditch the battle.

US officials are downplaying the concerns, insisting that the Iraqi troops are performing up to expectations. Locals are complaining that the troops showed up, looted their villages, and then just left, insisting they are no better than ISIS.

Looting and sectarian unrest are old problems, however, and the real problem is that this force of thousands of Iraqi troops is supposed to be the one taking over the heavily guarded city of Mosul. If they can’t even handle the villages, that Mosul offensive is far, far out of reach.

These Iraqi troops are mostly Shiites who don't give a crap about Mosul--if the Iraqi government troops can't do this then give the territory to the Kurds and let them take it with our help. When it's reclaimed it no longer belongs to the country of Iraq.
 

y2ksurvivor

Veteran Member
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-station-armored-brigade-eastern-europe-2017-151922715.html

US to station armored brigade in Eastern Europe: Pentagon

AFP

March 30, 2016

General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe

View photos
General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe (AFP Photo/Saul Loeb)
More

Washington (AFP) - The United States will step up its troop presence in Eastern Europe in response to "an aggressive Russia" by deploying an additional armored brigade, the US military said Wednesday.

Continuous rotations of the brigade beginning in early 2017 will bring the US Army's presence in Europe to three fully manned combat brigades, the US European Command said. A brigade comprises about 4,200 troops.

"This army implementation plan continues to demonstrate our strong and balanced approach to reassuring our NATO allies and partners in the wake of an aggressive Russia in Eastern Europe and elsewhere," General Philip Breedlove, the top US commander in Europe, said in a statement.

"Our allies and partners will see more capability," he added. "They will see a more frequent presence of an armored brigade with more modernized equipment in their countries."

Defense Secretary Ash Carter last month unveiled the Pentagon's proposed budget for next year, which includes $3.4 billion -- quadruple last year's amount -- for operations in Europe.

The cash will fund the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, which aims to deter Russia from carrying out additional land grabs after its 2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"These efforts demonstrate strong alliances and partnerships backed by demonstrated capability, capacity and readiness to deter aggression," Pentagon spokeswoman Laura Seal said.

"We have been clear that we will defend our interests, our allies and the principles of international order in Europe."

- Equipment upgrades -

The Pentagon's beefed-up European presence means US forces will increase military exercises with ally countries and train with new equipment.

An armored brigade combat team includes approximately 250 tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Paladin self-propelled howitzers, plus 1,750 wheeled vehicles.

Each armored brigade will be deployed for nine months and bring its own gear.

Equipment already in the region will be repaired and upgraded, then stored in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany, the military said.

Eastern European leaders welcomed the move.

Latvian Defense Minister Raimonds Bergmanis said the deployment bears out commitments made by President Barack Obama in a speech in the Estonian capital Tallinn in September 2014.

"This decision is particularly important after President Obama's statement," he said.

"Then, the US president said that Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius are just as important to protect as Berlin, Paris and London."

Russia has repeatedly warned against the permanent positioning of substantial forces from NATO along its border.

And some NATO members, like Germany, have been skeptical about any substantial permanent deployment, saying it could breach a 1997 agreement between the military alliance and Russia.

But the new US deployment avoids the issue because it is not technically permanently stationed in Eastern Europe, with brigades rotating in and out, US officials say.

Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and has been supporting a pro-Moscow separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine.

The US military has about 62,000 permanently assigned service members in Europe.

Oh right, Russia is the main threat to Europe's security at the moment...wtf?
 

LightEcho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Obama to decide. Yes, he is a military genius. His vast background with military ops and international strategic studies makes him the best mind on this serious topic. We can be sure the right choices will be made.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.janes.com/article/59175/apkws-ii-deployed-on-usmc-harriers

Air-Launched Weapons

APKWS II deployed on USMC Harriers

Richard Scott, London - IHS Jane's Missiles & Rockets
30 March 2016

1635748_-_main.jpg

http://www.janes.com/images/assets/175/59175/1635748_-_main.jpg

The US Marine Corps (USMC) has begun to field the fixed-wing variant of the Advanced Precision Kill Weapons System II (APKWS) on AV-8B Harrier II aircraft forward deployed to Bahrain as part of Operation 'Inherent Resolve', the US Central Command mission to degrade and defeat the Islamic State.

The accelerated delivery into theatre - announced by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) on 30 March - comes just seven months after a formal requirement was raised by Marine Corps headquarters. Fielding of this rapid deployment capability has seen the AV-8B become the first tactical aircraft (TACAIR) platform to integrate APKWS II.

Developed and manufactured by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration, APKWS II is a low-cost precision-guided 2.75-inch rocket that integrates a low-cost Distributed Aperture Semi-Active Laser Seeker (DASALS) guidance section with existing Hydra 70 rocket motors and warheads. Designed as a 'plug and play' kit, the DASALS unit is installed between the Hydra 70 warhead and the rocket motor; the seeker aperture is divided into four elements, with each element placed on the four wings of the guidance section to provide an integrated navigation solution of the weapon.

The USMC raised the requirement to introduce the fixed-wing APKWS to quickly provide the AV-8B with a low-cost, low-collateral damage, high-precision weapon offering improved weapon-to-target pairing. Two NAVSEA programme offices based at Naval Air Station Patuxent River - AV-8B Harrier Weapon System (PMA-257) and the Direct and Time Sensitive Strike (PMA-242) - have worked together to define a two-phase programme to rapidly release the APKWS II to service on the Harrier II platform: the first phase, which has included the delivery of 80 guidance kits, has expedited fielding of a limited AV-8B fixed-wing APKWS II employment flight envelope capability; the second phase will expand fixed-wing APKWS II employment envelope limits to the maximum extent possible for the AV-8B.


Want to read more? For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options ihs.com/contact

To read the full article, Client Login

(331 of 433 words)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.armytimes.com/story/mili...iraqi-armys-battle-against-isis-hit/82560060/

Trapped civilians slow Iraqi army's battle against ISIS in Hit

Susannah George, The Associated Press 5:19 p.m. EDT April 2, 2016

HIT, Iraq — As ground forces push west across Iraq in the fight against the Islamic State group, civilians are increasingly caught in the crossfire.

Iraq's elite counterterrorism forces say an estimated 20,000 civilians are trapped in the small western town of Hit, where Iraqi forces have recently relaunched an offensive aimed at cutting critical IS supply lines to neighboring Syria. The civilians, Iraqi commanders and U.S.-led coalition officials say, are slowing operations, making it more difficult to use airstrikes to clear terrain ahead of ground troops.

A single white flag flies above Mursid Nigris's house on the edge of a palm grove on the western outskirts of Hit, which lies in Anbar province, 85 miles (140 kilometers) west of the Iraqi capital. Behind his home, black clouds of smoke rise from the town's center. Counterterrorism forces pushed IS out of this largely agricultural neighborhood on the outskirts of Hit Thursday, but have made little progress since.

Iraqi forces relaunched the operation to take Hit early Thursday morning under cover of coalition airstrikes. The town lies along a supply line linking the extremist group's fighters in Iraq to those in neighboring Syria. Iraqi commanders say retaking the town will be a key step to link up government forces in Iraq's west and north in preparation for an eventual push on Mosul.

The original push was delayed by political instability in the capital, Baghdad. When anti-government protests escalated last month, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi pulled some military units from Anbar to Baghdad.

After parts of Ramadi fell to Iraqi forces in December last year, the government and the U.S.-led coalition have tried to build on those gains, moving up the Euphrates river valley and clearing IS from villages as they went. In the months that followed, thousands of civilians fleeing Iraqi military operations across Anbar descended on Hit.

While Iraqi forces have evacuated thousands of families as they've retaken territory from IS, thousands more simply fled or were forcibly moved by IS fighters as they retreated. The operations to Hit's north, west and south have effectively boxed civilians in to the small town.

"They honestly are just looking for a safe place they can reach quickly, they don't care if it is IS controlled or not," said a captain with the counterterrorism forces overseeing the Hit operation.

He spoke on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to brief the press.

Nigris, a 45-year-old farmer, is hosting 20 members of his extended family in his simple farm house. Although Hit fell to IS last summer, the town has remained relatively safe as airstrikes and the initial clashes between IS and Iraqi forces focused on the larger cities of Ramadi and Fallujah.

"Daesh would come to our house and interrogate us," Nigris said, using an arabic acronym for IS. "They would demand we confess we are with the police or the military."

Eventually, however, fighters largely left his family alone. The problem then was the longer IS stayed in Hit, the harder it became to find food, water and fuel for his family, Nigris said. Trade with the rest of the country ceased, and damage to the town's infrastructure meant few people had access to running water.

"Militarily we could liberate Hit in just one day," said Gen. Abdul-Ghani al-Asadi, the top counterterrorism forces commander, "but we are having problems with the families stuck inside."

Al-Asadi said the civilians have prevented the coalition from launching airstrikes and Iraqi military units from using heavy artillery. While the counterterrorism forces are some of Iraq's most capable ground forces, they are still heavily reliant on airstrikes to retake ground.

"This is a bigger problem than we saw in Ramadi. That city didn't contain that large of a number of civilians, at least not in such a concentrated area," al-Asadi said.

When Iraqi forces closed in on Ramadi in December, IS blocked the main roads out of the city, trapping families inside. Later, as the fighters were pushed out of some neighborhoods, they forced civilians to flee with them.

Hit is roughly a fifth of the size of Ramadi. Initial estimates of the number of civilians in Ramadi were around a thousand, but as Iraqi forces cleared the city many thousands more were discovered.

Al-Asadi said his forces are prepared to help evacuate civilians in Hit as they did in Ramadi, where special forces evacuated families as they took over territory. He added, however, that he believed the large number of trapped civilians would become an ever bigger complication facing operations as forces move north to the IS-held city of Mosul.

The captain with the counterterrorism forces overseeing the Hit operation says he doesn't believe IS has the manpower in Hit necessary to move civilians with them as they flee, but his men are still struggling to avoid civilian casualties when coordinating airstrikes.

"We're telling the civilians to mark their houses in a certain way so we can tell who is and who isn't a fighter," the captain said.

Initially he said his forces asked civilians in Ramadi to carry white flags as they fled, but the symbol was quickly adopted by IS to disguise counterattacks.

"It's not easy always coming up with new signs," the captain said, "the last time I saw a white flag it turned out to be a VBIED," he said using an American military acronym for a car bomb.

Associated Press writer Khalid Mohammed in Hit, Iraq contributed to this story
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/04/iraq-ramadi-liberation-reconstruction.html#

What it will cost to rebuild Iraq

Author Omar al-Jaffal
Posted April 1, 2016
Translator Pascale el-Khoury

BAGHDAD — “Ramadi has turned into ruins,” said Ouda, a soldier who has been fighting in the Iraqi army’s Seventh Division since mid-2015. Ouda took part in the liberation of Anbar province from the Islamic State (IS), which took hold of the city of Ramadi in May 2015.

Al-Monitor met Ouda (a pseudonym), who is a resident of Baghdad, in one of the cafes of the capital during his day off.

He recalled, “We fought with my comrades violent battles to expel radical IS militants in several axes of the city of Ramadi and the province of Hit. The battles wreaked havoc in Ramadi.”

Ouda described the situation in Ramadi to Al-Monitor on condition his real name not be used, because as a soldier he is not allowed to speak with the media.

“Ramadi’s houses and streets are all filled with mines. The entire city will crumble as a result of the vast quantity of mines left by IS,” he said.

Ouda, who is in his mid-30s, said that IS has booby-trapped everything. “Mines exploded all over the place as we moved inside the city. This is IS’ style. It destroys everything.”

The High Level United Nations mission to Ramada confirmed this situation, estimating that the city could be one of the worst mine-infested cities in the world. The mission's statement followed the visit to Ramadi on March 22 of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) resident representative and UN resident and humanitarian coordinator for Iraq, Lise Grande.

After assessing the situation in the city, Grande said in a press statement, “It is a tragedy that people are dying and injured because of booby traps. The reality is that many if not most neighborhoods in Ramadi aren’t yet safe.”

A UN analysis of satellite imagery in February showed that around 5,700 buildings in Ramadi and its outskirts had sustained different levels of damage since mid-2014, with almost 2,000 buildings completely destroyed.

The staggering devastation of Ramadi and fear of mines pushed Khansa al-Dulaimi to leave Ramadi in April 2015 and seek refuge in Baghdad. Dulaimi rented a small apartment in the predominantly Sunni neighborhood of Adhamiya, while her husband fled via Turkey to Europe. She hopes her family will be reunited again if her husband is granted asylum in Germany.

She told Al-Monitor that she did not own a home in Ramadi, but lived in a rented house. “Things are difficult there. I am afraid to return to Ramadi because of the land mines and lack of security in the city. I will stay here in Baghdad for now,” she said.

Dulaimi lives off her savings; her husband had sold his car before he left and she sold all her gold jewelry. The family's savings allow her to provide for her three children who stay with her in Baghdad.

She said, “I will not go back. I would rather bear the hardship of living here in Baghdad instead of watching death every day in Ramadi.”

Member of parliament Liqa al-Wardi from Anbar told Al-Monitor that the city of Ramadi is like the Syrian town of Kobani because of the fighting, military operations and indiscriminate terrorist bombings.

“Thousands of houses, hospitals and bridges have been destroyed, as well as [public] buildings and schools,” she said. “The city was [already] neglected by the Iraqi governments after 2003, and now it is witnessing difficult circumstances.”

Wardi called on the Iraqi government to cooperate with the international community to reconstruct Ramadi and not to undervalue the previous and ongoing destruction and devastation. “The city requires large sums of money, but that doesn't mean it should be abandoned,” she said. According to her, the reconstruction of Ramadi is an essential and positive step for the return of its displaced residents.

Bassem Jamil Antoine, vice president of the Economists and Industrialists Iraqi Association, told Al-Monitor, “Iraq needs about $60 billion to ensure the reconstruction of areas recaptured from IS in Iraq, including Ramadi. Iraq will not be able to afford the reconstruction of these cities without international efforts and aid.”

Following his visit to Iraq on March 26, Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon promised international support for the country to reconstruct the liberated areas, acknowledging the significant challenges facing Iraq in the future.

In a press statement, Ban pointed to the challenges that remain to be addressed in these areas, including massive destruction and widespread contamination of improvised explosive devices.

Saad al-Hadithi, a spokesman for Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, told Al-Monitor, “Ban’s visit is a confirmation of the international community's support for Iraq in overcoming its financial crisis. A donors' conference will be held in April 2016; it will probably be held in the Jordanian capital, Amman, to raise funds for the reconstruction of liberated areas, including Ramadi.”

Hadithi added, “The World Bank expressed its desire to reconstruct liberated areas by providing financial aid, determining the method of spending such aid and ensuring there is no suspicion of corruption. The World Bank and the Islamic Development Bank will encourage international organizations and donors to attend the donors conference to support Iraq in the reconstruction of liberated areas.”

The reconstruction of Ramadi and other devastated Iraqi cities and the return of their displaced residents is now being discussed by international parties. It remains to be seen, however, whether the international community is up to the challenge.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/japan-sub-makes-first-call-philippines-15-years-092811713.html?nhp=1

Japan sub makes first call to Philippines in 15 years amid China tensions

By Peter Blaza
April 3, 2016

SUBIC BAY, Philippines (Reuters) - A Japanese submarine made a port call in the Philippines, the first in 15 years, on Sunday in a show of growing military cooperation amid tension triggered by China's growing assertiveness in the South China Sea.

One of the newest and largest submarines in the Japanese navy, it was escorted into the former U.S. Navy Base at Subic Bay by two Japanese destroyers on a tour of Southeast Asia.

"This is just an exercise and the main objective is to train the officers," Captain Hiraoki Yoshino of Japan's Maritime Self-Defence Force told reporters.

"We don't have any message to any country," he said, adding the ship visits were aimed at boosting confidence between the Japan and the Philippines.

China claims almost all the South China Sea, where about $5 trillion of ship-borne trade passes every year. Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Taiwan also have claims.

Japan and China also have conflicting claims over islets in the East China Sea. Japan is increasing its presence in the South China Sea, sending more ships and planes to allies in Southeast Asia, like Vietnam and the Philippines.

The Philippines and the United States start military drills on Monday, including simulating the retaking an island seized by an imaginary enemy in the South China Sea, an exercise likely to rile China.

Japan has offered to help the Philippines boost its capability in monitoring what is going on in the South China Sea by leasing three TC-90 surveillance planes, a deal that could be sealed late this month.

(Writing By Manuel Mogato, Editing By Nick Macfie)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.voanews.com/content/iraq-suicide-attacks/3268164.html

News / Middle East

Suicide Attacks Kill 24 in Iraq

VOA News
April 04, 2016 8:32 AM

A series of suicide bombings Monday killed at least 24 people and wounded 60 others across Iraq.

Several of the blasts targeted Iraqi troops and paramilitary fighters.

One bombing hit a security checkpoint in a northeastern Baghdad suburb, while another struck pro-government fighters north of the capital in Mashahdeh.

In the south, an attacker also detonated explosives at a restaurant popular with militia fighters in the city of Nassiriyah, and another hit the city of Basra.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attacks. Islamic State militants have frequently used suicide bombings against Iraqi security forces.

March was an especially deadly month for Iraqi security forces and pro-government militias with acts of terror and violence killing 544 troops, according to U.N. data.

That was the highest number of deaths since August, and only four months have registered more Iraqi troop deaths since Islamic State militants swept through large areas of northern and western Iraq in mid-2014.

The U.N. said about 1,500 Iraqi civilians were also killed in the first three months of this year with more than 4,300 people injured.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.realcleardefense.com/art...et_up_more_small_outposts_in_iraq_109232.html

April 6, 2016

Pentagon: U.S. may set up More Small Outposts in Iraq

By Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon will consider opening more small military outposts that would provide artillery support and other aid to Iraqi forces as they prepare to retake the northern city of Mosul from Islamic State militants, a senior military officer on the Joint Staff said Wednesday.

Rear. Adm. Andrew Lewis, the vice director for operations, said there may be situations where the U.S. would either open a base or reopen one that was used in the earlier Iraq war. Those outposts, he said, would be behind the front lines, and would be used the way U.S. Marines are operating out of what has been known as Fire Base Bell, outside Makhmour.

Last month fewer than 200 Marines set up the outpost and provided targeting assistance and artillery fire for the Iraqis. It was the first time such a base had been established by the U.S. since it returned forces to Iraq in 2014.

Initially military officials said the base was set up purely to provide force protection for Iraqi forces and U.S. advisers at the nearby Iraqi base in Makhmour.

But soon after, the Marines were firing illumination rounds to help the Iraqi forces locate IS fighters, and also firing artillery rounds in support of the operation, as Iraqi troops took control of several villages on the outskirts of Makhmour, southeast of Mosul. The Marine remained well behind the front lines.

Lewis said that setting up another similar base as the Iraqi forces move toward Mosul is "dependent on what's happening on the ground" and in the military campaign.

"As Iraqi security forces progress toward isolating Mosul, there may be a situation in which there is another base," he said, adding that it could be a former U.S. outpost and would be used to provide artillery fire from behind the front lines.

"Their mission is to provide fires and support of Iraqi forces, just like we do with airplanes, just it's surface-to-surface fires (versus) air-to-surface fires," he said. "Same concept, very accurate."

He added that additional security measures have been put in place at Fire Base Bell since an attack on the outpost several weeks ago.

Marine Staff Sgt. Louis F. Cardin of Temecula, California, was killed by rocket fire in that attack. The Marines at the fire base are part of the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, which has been based on the USS Kearsarge, an amphibious assault ship that has been deployed in the region.

Pentagon officials have said they are on a temporary, short-term deployment into Iraq.

During the years of the Iraq war, U.S. forces set up a number of small forward operating bases or combat outposts around the country.

Lewis also noted there has been a recent name change for Fire Base Bell. It's unclear why the military changed names, but the new name — the Karasoar Counterfire Complex — reflects the Iraqi location and appears to focus more on its security mission rather than a combat role.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/...ive-ground-troops-needed-160406163810756.html

Iraq halts ISIL offensive as more ground troops needed

Build-up operation to retake Mosul paused until police and tribal reinforcements arrive to hold captured ground.

07 Apr 2016 06:47 GMT | ISIS, Iraq, Middle East

An Iraqi army offensive touted as the first phase of a campaign to recapture the northern city of Mosul from Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant has been paused until more forces arrive to hold ground, the commander in charge said on Wednesday.

Almost three weeks into the operation, Iraqi forces have retaken just three villages from ISIL, also known as ISIS, in the Makhmour area, which is set to be a key staging ground for a future assault on Mosul, about 60km further north.

The faltering start has cast renewed doubt on the capabilities of the Iraqi army, which partially collapsed when ISIL took about one-third of the country in 2014.

The news came as eight Iraqi forces were killed in an attack launched by ISIL on a military barracks in al-Ma'amel village, east of Fallujah, sources told Al Jazeera.

Major General Najm Abdullah al-Jubbouri, who is in charge of the Makhmour offensive, said Iraqi forces were now waiting for the arrival of federal police units and additional local tribal fighters to hold territory after it is retaken.

That would free up his forces to go on the offensive against the rebels, Jubbouri said in a statement, dismissing what he described as efforts to disparage the army.

"We do not want to use all our units to hold territory," he said.

The initial target of the latest offensive was Qayara - an ISIL hub on the western bank of the Tigris river - but Iraqi forces have so far failed to recapture the hilltop village of Nasr on the eastern side.

In the statement, Jubbouri said fighters had dug a network of tunnels beneath Nasr and prepared suicide bombers and a fleet of vehicles rigged with explosives, some of which contain weaponised chlorine, a chemical weapon ISIL has used before in northern Iraq.

US Army Major Jon-Paul Depreo, operations officer for the international coalition fighting ISIL in Iraq and neighbouring Syria, said at the weekend the insurgents were determined not to lose Nasr because of its strategic position on high ground.

Depreo also said difficult terrain meant it was not possible to deploy a large number of forces there against fighters, who are more familiar with the area.

"These [Iraqi army] forces aren't from that area necessarily, so they're learning the area," Depreo told reporters in Baghdad.

READ MORE: Wave of ISIL attacks kills 60 in Iraq

The coalition, led by the United States, has trained thousands of Iraqi police and soldiers in preparation for the operation to retake Mosul - by far the largest city in ISIL's self-proclaimed caliphate.

Depreo said the fighting was only one part of the challenge. "There's going to be a lot of fighting but there's also going to be a lot of logistical infrastructure that needs to follow and be established."

Shia militias and Kurdish Peshmerga have played a major role in the fight, but with Mosul the plan is for the army to take the lead to avoid inflaming ethnic and sectarian sensitivities in the mainly Sunni Arab city.

The army won its first major victory over the fighters last December in Ramadi and aims to retake Mosul this year, but Iraqi officials privately question whether that is possible.

"It's a tough fight," Depreo said of the offensive in Makhmour, describing it as a "shaping operation" for the bigger battle ahead. "We have a lot of work to do before we take control of Mosul again."
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Iraqi troops turn tail vs. ISIS — again
Started by Dennis Olson‎, Today 12:25 PM
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?488965-Iraqi-troops-turn-tail-vs.-ISIS-—-again

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-04-07-13-30-37

Apr 7, 1:30 PM EDT

Siege tactics complicate fight for key IS-held Iraqi town

By SUSANNAH GEORGE
Associated Press

HIT, Iraq (AP) -- As they advanced on the Islamic State-held town of Hit, Iraqi counterterrorism troops had to decide how to press the attack. If they stormed in with armor and airstrikes, they risked heavy casualties and might allow the militants to flee.

Gen. Abdel Ghani al-Asadi, the commander of the elite troops, chose a different approach: Surround the strategic western town with a slow and methodical cordon, trapping the extremists inside.

It's a tactic that's been used elsewhere to claw back Iraqi territory that was seized by the Islamic State group in 2014.

While the decision may have been more time-consuming, allowing the militants in Hit to dig in, lay defenses and launch attacks that initially also trapped tens of thousands of civilians, Iraqi forces believe the approach is a key to making their territorial gains stick and reduce their casualties.

Six counterterrorism battalions pushed up from the west last weekend to cut off Hit's northern edge, zigzagging in the soft desert terrain and taking more than 12 hours to advance only a few kilometers (miles).

"We don't want them to be able to flee," al-Asadi said, referring to the IS fighters. "We want them to stay inside so we can finish them."

If the militants escaped, he said, they would probably return and infiltrate the town once his men had moved on to the next battle.

Hit, in Anbar province west of the capital of Baghdad, sits along an IS supply line that links Iraqi territory controlled by the extremist group with its base in Syria. Officials in the Iraqi military and the U.S.-led coalition fighting IS believe that by clearing the town, they can build on recent territorial gains in the vast province.

That would move them closer to two major goals: isolating the IS-held city of Fallujah, 40 miles (65 kilometers) west of Baghdad, and linking up government forces in the west and the north in preparation for an eventual push on Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city that also is held by the extremist group.

As Iraqi forces closed in on Hit, al-Asadi said he ordered the town's main bridge over the Euphrates River destroyed by a coalition airstrike to slow the flight of IS fighters. In the days that followed, dozens of boats IS used were also destroyed by coalition bombs, the Pentagon said.

In the initial stage of the operation last month, some IS militants sought to knit themselves further into the civilian fabric of the town. Fighters vanished from Hit's main streets, occupying abandoned houses or forcing their way into homes where civilians were still living, according to residents who evacuated.

"They began moving more and more into the narrow side streets and the civilian areas," one resident told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to protect the safety of relatives still trapped in Hit.

Al-Asadi said his men were increasingly finding fighters from the Islamic State group posing as civilian refugees.

"One of the ways we can tell is you can see they shaved their beards very quickly," al-Asadi said, smiling. "They have cuts from the razor on their faces."

Because tens of thousands of civilians were still inside Hit when the operation began, only about 20 coalition airstrikes per week were launched to clear territory, Iraqi commanders said.

By contrast, coalition jets conducted 20 airstrikes in a single day when Iraqi forces retook the northern town of Sinjar last year - and more than 60 in the week it fell. But Sinjar was smaller than Hit, and almost all civilians had left.

The trickle of civilians from Hit turned into a flood on Monday as a column of Humvees carrying elite Iraqi forces began rolling through agricultural neighborhoods and then into residential blocks. Thousands of civilians filled Hit's northern main road, the only route left open.

A half-dozen Humvees escorted the initial wave of evacuating civilians, with elderly people in wheelchairs loaded onto the back of the vehicles. Troops shouted for children to stay within the tire tracks of the big vehicles, and farm animals were prodded into that safe path as well.

A day earlier, dozens of bombs that had been sown by militants along the road had been cleared by the troops.

While civilians were being loaded into trucks to be taken to a camp, one of the bombs exploded with a plume of orange smoke along the path they had just traversed. Commanders said it had been triggered prematurely and no one was hurt.

All the while, helicopter gunships circled above, firing into the town.

The evacuation further slowed the military operation, with dozens of vehicles and troops having to be pulled back from the front to control the crowd of civilians.

"They come toward our forces. They know that if they flee toward Daesh, they will be shot," said Brig. Gen. Sami Khathan al-Aradi, using an Arabic acronym for the Islamic State.

Al-Aradi admitted that the evacuation had brought military activity to a near halt at times, but he noted that "these are orders" from his fellow commanders.

"The streets are narrow. You can't move the civilians to the side because of all the roadside bombs," he said.

A 19-year-old named Athra, who asked that her last name not be used in order to protect relatives still in IS-held territory, said she understood why the Iraqi forces were moving slowly and deliberately around Hit and not allowing the militants to escape.

"They don't want them to just return after the fighting is over," said Athra, who originally was from Ramadi and left Hit with her family when clashes broke out in the streets around her home.

She explained that many Anbar residents believe the rise of IS in Anbar province was facilitated by the large number of al-Qaida sympathizers who moved back in or remained in towns and villages after U.S. forces withdrew in 2011 following the war.

"We don't want the same thing to happen again," she said.

---

Associated Press writer Khalid Mohammed in Hit contributed to this report.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-usa-idUSKCN0X50KB

World | Fri Apr 8, 2016 11:20am EDT
Related: World, Iraq

Kerry urges Iraq not to let politics impede war against IS

BAGHDAD | By Arshad Mohammed

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, visiting Baghdad on Friday, urged Iraq not to let its political crisis interfere with the fight against Islamic State and voiced unequivocal support for Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

Abadi last week unsettled Iraq's political elite with a proposed cabinet reshuffle that aims to curb corruption by replacing long-time politicians with technocrats and academics.

His aim is to free Iraqi ministries from the grip of a political class that has used the system of ethnic and sectarian quotas instituted after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 to amass wealth and influence.

U.S. officials fear the political unrest may harm Iraq's efforts to retake territory it has lost to Islamic State militants, notably its second city of Mosul, seized when parts of the Iraqi army collapsed in 2014.

Kerry told reporters that decisions about the reshuffle were for the Iraqis to decide but said he had indicated to Abadi that it was important to have political stability in Iraq so that military operations are not affected.

"I want to reiterate the support of President Obama, Vice President Biden, myself as secretary, and the entire administration (in) the United States for Prime Minister Abadi, who has demonstrated critical leadership in the face of enormous security, economic and political challenges," Kerry told reporters at the U.S. Embassy inside Baghdad's fortified Green Zone.

Kerry met earlier with Abadi, who is grappling with an economy battered by low oil prices and strained by the cost of the war against Islamic State which has displaced more than three million people and destroyed towns and cities.


Related Coverage
› Kerry says Iraq's Abadi did not request new U.S. troops

Kerry said the United States was providing an additional $155 million in humanitarian aid to Iraqis displaced by Islamic State.


MOSUL OFFENSIVE ON HOLD

Asked if there had been any discussion about more U.S. troops going to Iraq, Kerry said there had been no formal request from the Iraqis and the issue had not been raised on Friday.

The United States, which withdrew its forces from Iraq in 2011, has redeployed several thousand as part of a coalition it is leading against Islamic State.

In the past two weeks, Iraqi forces backed by U.S.-led coalition air strikes have retaken significant parts of Hit, a town 130 km (80 miles) northwest of Baghdad.

However, an offensive billed as the first phase of a campaign to recapture the northern city of Mosul has been put on hold until reinforcements arrive.

Kerry said Abadi had made clear his commitment to retaking Mosul and that he has a timetable for doing so.

"The fact is, in Iraq, Daesh fighters have not been on the offensive in months," Kerry said, using an Arabic acronym for Islamic State. "They are losing ground, including more than 40 percent of the territory that they once controlled in Iraq."

Baghdad is also hamstrung by the plunge in global oil prices that has shriveled its main source of revenue.

On Thursday, officials from the International Monetary Fund and the government said the oil price forecast in the 2016 budget would be cut to about $32 a barrel from $45, widening Iraq's fiscal deficit by several billion dollars.

Kerry also met Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari and the head of the Kurdistan Regional Government, Nechirvan Barzani.


(Additional reporting by Maher Chmaytelli and Stephen Kalin; Editing by Janet Lawrence and John Stonestreet)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2016/04/11/giving_iraq_a_fighting_chance_111808.html

April 11, 2016

Giving Iraq a Fighting Chance

By Anthony Cordesman
Comments 3

The war in Iraq sometimes seems distant and abstract. The expansion of ISIS terrorist attacks in Europe, the Syrian refugee issue, and Russian intervention in Syria get the bulk of media and public attention. The slow Iraqi gains in Anbar, and the city-by-city fighting that never quite seems to end is only dealt with in passing. The core of the U.S. military effort against ISIS is, however, centered in Iraq. Defeating ISIS depends on U.S. success in rebuilding the Iraq Army and its ability to drive ISIS out of Iraq.

The United States has only slowly built up the kind of train and assist mission that can give Iraqi ground forces the capabilities they need. The United States did, however, begin major offensive air operations against ISIS on August 8, 2014. It flew 11,398 strike sorties by April 5, 2016, and it allocated 7,683 of those sorties to Iraq, and only 3,715 to Syria. Since that time, it has spent some $6.5 billion on these operations.

The reasons why the United States resumed a combat role in Iraq are all too clear. ISIS is one of the cruelest and most violent political movements in history. It has been a key source of international terrorism and has spread into many other countries. ISIS threatens the world's major center of petroleum exports, and with it the stability of the global economy. It is a threat to every U.S. friend and ally in the region, and every moderate regime and state.

It is also important to remember that the fighting in Syria and Iraq cannot be separated, and the human tragedy in both countries keeps mounting. ISIS forces took Mosul, then Iraq's second largest city, with a population approaching two and one-half million, on June 10, 2014. Since then, ISIS has driven some one million people out of the greater Mosul area and has come close to transforming one of the most populated parts of Iraq into a living hell. In fact, the majority of the people who have suffered from ISIS rule have been in Iraq. The bulk of the Syrian refugee problem, and Syrian civilian casualties, have been inflicted by the Assad regime.

The United States has chosen not to deploy major combat land units-a decision which may well be wise given the problems of deploying U.S. forces into nations with deep ethnic and sectarian tensions, Iranian and Hezbollah influence, and that must ultimately shape their own security and destiny. It is all too clear, however, that Iraq cannot succeed in defeating ISIS-or in creating some form of stability and security-without a major U.S. "train and assist" mission to aid the Iraqi army. It is also clear that there can be no security or stability in Syria until ISIS loses its power base in Iraq.

The Obama Administration recognized the need for an on the ground train and assist to a limited degree when it began to set up training centers in the rear to try to rebuild the Iraqi army. As many senior U.S. officers privately made clear at the time, however, a successful train and assist mission could be limited to secure training facilities in the rear. The Iraqi Army had never taken the lead in combat before U.S. combat forces left Iraq at the end of 2011. It suffered from near fatal levels of political interference and corruption under Iraq's former Prime Minister Maliki, and it shattered in the face of minor ISIS attacks. It is hard to build an army. It is all too easy for self-seeking political leaders to destroy one.

The Administration, however, chose to do far too little and too late in an effort to avoid combat casualties and being seen as putting any "boots on the ground." The end result was that the United States had to slowly and painfully increase the size and role of its train and assist mission to something closer to the levels many military advisors had recommended from the start. It has had to push trainers and advisors forward, provide fire support in some areas, reach out to Kurdish and Arab Sunni forces, and quietly increase its role in directly advising and assisting the forward deployed Iraq forces that lead Iraq's combat effort on the ground.

This process of creeping incrementalism almost certainly delayed Iraqi progress and added to the tragedy in Iraq and Syria, but the Administration slowly seems to be waking up to the reality that some "boots on the ground" are vital-that advisors must be present to help shape Iraqi combat capability and leadership and to make sure that U.S. air support is effective. The current reports that the United States may increase the number of forward firebases in Iraq indicate that the United States may now be ready to act on the scale it should have chosen from the start. The details, however, are unclear, and too little, too late is not going to work when the fighting moves to Mosul and the real core of the ISIS position in Iraq.

Victory will also require further sacrifices by the U.S. military. There have already been minor casualties as U.S. advisors have moved forward, although the levels have so far been minimal. ISIS will lash out wherever it can against the U.S presence as it becomes more and more threatened-the United States will also face risks from other extremists.

The alternative, however, is to steadily broaden the time it will take to defeat ISIS, extend the threat of terrorism in the United States and Europe, extend the threat to our regional allies, and increase the number of refugees and innocent civilians that suffer. What would still be a very limited U.S. presence could make a vital difference in both strategic and human terms.

Reprinted with permission from the Center for Strategic & International Studies.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.lawfareblog.com/why-victory-mosul-wont-solve-americas-iraq-conundrum

Foreign Policy Essay

Why Victory in Mosul Won’t Solve America’s Iraq Conundrum

By Joshua Rovner, Caitlin Talmadge
Sunday, April 10, 2016, 10:08 AM

Editor's Note: Despite its successful terrorist attacks in Europe, the Islamic State is being hit hard in Iraq. Indeed, Iraqi forces and their U.S. and coalition allies are gearing up to retake Mosul, Iraq's second largest city and the Islamic State's main base in the country. Although kicking the Islamic State out of Mosul would be a true sign of progress, Joshua Rovner of SMU and Caitlin Talmadge of GWU offer some cautions. They point out that ultimate success will depend on who fights the battle, who rules after the peace, and how Mosul is integrated into overall U.S. planning.

***

ISIS is back on its heels in both Syria and Iraq, and the Iraqi government announced on March 24 that the all-important, yet much-delayed campaign to re-take the critical Iraqi city of Mosul has finally begun. Starting with attacks on towns south of the city, the campaign’s goal is to effect a “slow strangulation” of ISIS in Mosul, much as in the successful effort against ISIS in Ramadi last year.

Unfortunately, it is one thing to recognize that ISIS is becoming weaker, but quite another to exploit its weakness in a way that leads to a meaningful victory and a durable peace. Three crucial questions remain unanswered about the coming battle for Mosul and the larger implications for the United States and Iraq. Without good answers, even a vigorous campaign may deliver only marginal strategic results.

Who will fight the battle?

The Mosul campaign includes a hodge-podge of actors with varying interests, capabilities, and will to fight. It is a microcosm of the war as a whole.

Washington has been sending mixed signals about its own commitment to the battle. On the one hand, the Obama administration is careful to stress that it must be and will be an Iraqi-led effort. The president has repeatedly declared that he does not want U.S. forces in a large ground war resulting in an open-ended occupation of Iraq.

On the other hand, he has pledged the destruction of ISIS, as have all the presidential candidates. This suggests that the United States will settle for nothing less than a comprehensive victory. And given Mosul’s size and symbolic importance for ISIS, it is not hard to imagine that the United States will send additional U.S. forces if the Iraqi army fails. Indeed, the United States has already established a division headquarters in Iraq, which is a somewhat odd command arrangement for what amounts to a brigade-sized force. It has also committed a disproportionate number of generals to Iraq. Both of these decisions suggest that the United States has put in place the logistical backbone for a much larger surge of land forces if required.

The Iraqi army has also sent mixed signals. Although its leaders have recently expressed confidence in their growing capabilities, there are real reasons to doubt them. The ISIS summer offensive in 2014 quickly routed the army in all areas except the Shi’a heartland in Baghdad and southern Iraq. Officers and soldiers showed little enthusiasm for fighting far from home. Efforts to improve their capabilities and inject new motivation have been halting at best since that time. The recent victories against ISIS resulted largely from action by Kurdish and Shi’a militias, U.S. airpower, and a small force of increasingly overworked elite Iraqi counterterrorism troops that were intensively trained by U.S. Green Berets—not from the efforts of conventional Iraqi forces. Indeed, one analyst has gone so far as to argue that the army itself is a fiction.


The Mosul campaign includes a hodge-podge of actors with varying interests, capabilities, and will to fight. It is a microcosm of the war as a whole

Turning the broken Iraqi army into a cohesive force will be especially difficult, because the Iraqi government has a long history of deliberately undermining battlefield effectiveness in order to protect against coups. In the past, this has meant restricting realistic combat training and inhibiting communication among talented commanders, while promoting officers based on loyalty rather than competence and ensuring sectarian homogeneity among the officer corps. It is difficult to overcome the legacy of these efforts. And while there are historical precedents for turning around deeply politicized militaries, this is a particularly hard test because it requires a largely Shi’a army to fight in an overwhelmingly Sunni city.

Kurdish fighters have similarly proven very effective – and quite ruthless – in their defense of Kurdish strongholds, and the operational plan for Mosul relies heavily on Kurdish support. Indeed, the current offensive against Qayyarah is being launched from Kurdish-held Makhmour, and Kurds are expected to cut off ISIS’ escape routes to the north and west of the city. But strangling a desperate ISIS force may require close combat with desperate ISIS fighters, and as Sun Tzu reminds us, no one fights harder than those on “death ground.” Whether the Kurds are willing to fight back in those circumstances, especially if they have no expectation of being able to keep territory they die to re-take, is an open question.

Indigenous and Iranian-backed Shi’a militia may also take part in the fight, much as they did during the recapture of Tikrit last year. At a minimum, their presence will create operational difficulties given their unwillingness to communicate directly with American commanders. And while they make common cause against ISIS, their long-term interests are not the same.

Finally, there is ISIS. The common assumption is that Mosul will be a particularly hellacious battle because ISIS attaches so much importance to the city and because it has had so much time to prepare urban defenses. U.S. and Iraqi forces destroyed large parts of Ramadi in order to take it, even though it was defended by fewer than one thousand militants. What will it take to uproot the group from Mosul, where ISIS may have thousands more?

That said, ISIS has proven willing to abandon cities such Sinjar without putting up much of a fight, and many fighters apparently fled Ramadi rather than choosing martyrdom. The coming battle will be much easier if they do the same in Mosul, or just put down the arms and hide in place. Paradoxically, though, maintaining the peace might be more difficult under those circumstances, because forces occupying the city will face a latent danger of renewed violence if these forces later come out of hiding.

Who will rule the peace?

Suppose everything goes well in the battle. Assume that the motley crew that makes up the Mosul offensive works well together and coordinates its activities without suffering too much political or operational friction. Assume also that ISIS gives up the city without a big fight. Then what?

Obviously, U.S. leaders would welcome such an outcome, but maintaining peace and order would still be tricky. Mosul is a Sunni Arab city. Many, perhaps most, of its residents are deeply skeptical about the government in Baghdad, which they believe is trying to institutionalize Shi’a dominance. Recall the wave of anti-government protests in Mosul and elsewhere that occurred before the ISIS invasion in 2014: there is deep and abiding distrust of the post-Saddam state and what it represents. The Sunni may despise life under ISIS rule, but they are not enthusiastic about life under what they fear is a repressive, sectarian government either. And while they might welcome Iraqi army units for a while, their distrust of the institutions of the state may soon translate into hostility toward what look like occupying forces, especially if those forces are largely Shi’a and possibly proxies for Iran.

As discussed above, if the Kurds end up doing some of the most dangerous fighting, they, too, are likely to want a reward for their efforts. Giving the Kurds a lasting role in Mosul may sit poorly with the local Sunni Arab and newly arrived Shi’a forces, however. Similar tensions already have arisen across the border, where Syrian Kurdish forces have taken territory from ISIS but refused to return it to Arabs afterwards and even razed Arab villages.

Finally, U.S. forces likely have been trying to get intelligence from Sunni Arab tribes in and around Mosul. Such “intelligence preparation of the battlespace” is normal, and the U.S. experience in the Iraq surge (2007-2008) may be seen as a precedent for similar joint actions against a common radical foe. If this is true, then the United States may have promised them a stake in post-battle reconstruction and governance. Failing to make good on such a promise would undermine the peace, given Sunni fears of another status reversal. But following through might alienate the Kurds and Shi’a and prove unacceptable to Baghdad.

All of these dilemmas are likely even if the battle is relatively quick and bloodless, but will be much more acute if it is not. The more warring parties sink costs into the battle, the more they are likely to fight over the aftermath.

How will the result of battle affect the outcome of the war?

The last and most important question is how the Mosul operation fits into the broader U.S. approach to the war in Iraq and Syria. Strategy involves using military violence to achieve political ends. Put another way, it is the art of translating something kinetically destructive into something politically constructive. But it is not clear that the United States can put the Iraqi Humpty Dumpty back together again, even after ISIS is evicted from Mosul.


But it is not clear that the United States can put the Iraqi Humpty Dumpty back together again, even after ISIS is evicted from Mosul.

In the best case scenario, the experience of fighting ISIS will have led to a kind of ethno-sectarian balancing in Iraq, forcing all sides to understand the need for a durable settlement that overcomes past grievances. If the United States can shepherd Mosul through the dangerous early period immediately following the violence, perhaps the various interested parties will be more willing to make sacrifices in the name of peace rather than risk the return of ISIS.

A more likely scenario is that the struggle for political power will continue and the threat of war will linger despite a decline in violence. Counter-network operations can work to erode ISIS capabilities, just as they worked against al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) during the last decade. But dismantling ISIS is not the same as building new political institutions, and Iraq’s fractured history suggests that state building will be a long and difficult process, punctuated by violence as different groups scramble for security and control. Removing ISIS from the equation will ease the process, for now, but it won’t solve the underlying political problem.

A worse scenario is that Iraq descends into a renewed cycle of civil war, as disaffected Sunni Arabs periodically align with some new group against the government in Baghdad and the Kurds in the north, just as the Sunnis have with AQI and ISIS in the past. This dreary future is possible as long as Iraq’s Sunni population feels that it is isolated and repressed. In fact, Sunni grievances might become even more salient without the common distraction of ISIS, and the problem of cyclical violence is made worse by the fact that armed groups may enjoy sanctuary across the border in Syria, much as the Afghan Taliban have been able to find refuge in Pakistan.

The United States simply may not be able to forge a durable peace, no matter how well it rallies the peculiar coalition marching to Mosul. In fact, given the politically unpopular alternative of returning a large U.S. occupation force to the country, Washington might end up treating Iraq the way it treats Somalia: as a country beyond state-building, where U.S. forces occasionally use violence to break up terrorist gatherings. Grim as it is, this possibility merits close consideration as the battle for Mosul approaches.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-usa-islamic-state-insi-idUSKCN0X909A

World | Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:28am EDT
Related: World, United Nations, Iraq

As Islamic State is pushed back in Iraq, worries about what's next

WASHINGTON | By Jonathan Landay, Warren Strobel and Phil Stewart


As U.S.-led offensives drive back Islamic State in Iraq, concern is growing among U.S. and U.N. officials that efforts to stabilize liberated areas are lagging, creating conditions that could help the militants endure as an underground network.

One major worry: not enough money is being committed to rebuild the devastated provincial capital of Ramadi and other towns, let alone Islamic State-held Mosul, the ultimate target in Iraq of the U.S.-led campaign.

Lise Grande, the No. 2 U.N. official in Iraq, told Reuters that the United Nations is urgently seeking $400 million from Washington and its allies for a new fund to bolster reconstruction in cities like Ramadi, which suffered vast damage when U.S.-backed Iraqi forces recaptured it in December.

"We worry that if we don't move in this direction, and move quickly, the progress being made against ISIL may be undermined or lost," Grande said, using an acronym for Islamic State.

Adding to the difficulty of stabilizing freed areas are Iraq's unrelenting political infighting, corruption, a growing fiscal crisis and the Shiite Muslim-led government's fitful efforts to reconcile with aggrieved minority Sunnis, the bedrock of Islamic State support.

Some senior U.S. military officers share the concern that post-conflict reconstruction plans are lagging behind their battlefield efforts, officials said.

"We're not going to bomb our way out of this problem," one U.S. official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

(Graphic showing Islamic State's territorial control: tmsnrt.rs/23aQU31)

Islamic State is far from defeated. The group still controls much of its border-spanning "caliphate," inspires eight global affiliates and is able to orchestrate deadly external attacks like those that killed 32 people in Brussels on March 22.

But at its core in Iraq and Syria, Islamic State appears to be in slow retreat. Defense analysis firm IHS Janes estimates the group lost 22 percent of its territory over the last 15 months.

Washington has spent vastly more on the war than on reconstruction. The military campaign cost $6.5 billion from 2014 through Feb. 29, according to the Pentagon.

The United States has contributed $15 million to stabilization efforts, donated $5 million to help clear explosives in Ramadi and provided "substantial direct budget support" to Iraq's government, said Emily Horne, a National Security Council spokeswoman.

Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged the need for more reconstruction aid while in Baghdad last week.

"As more territory is liberated from Daesh, the international community has to step up its support for the safe and voluntary return of civilians to their homes," Kerry said, using an Arabic acronym for Islamic State.

Kerry, who announced $155 million in additional U.S. aid for displaced Iraqis, said U.S. President Barack Obama planned to raise the issue at a summit of Gulf Arab leaders on April 21.


"PILE OF RUBBLE"

Ramadi's main hospital, train station, nearly 2,000 homes, 64 bridges and much of the electricity grid were destroyed in fighting, a preliminary U.N. survey found last month. Thousands of other buildings were damaged.

Some 3,000 families recently returned to parts of the city cleared of mines, according to the governor, Hameed Dulaymi, but conditions are tough. Power comes from generators. Water is pumped from the Euphrates River. A few shops are open, but only for a couple of hours a day.

Ahmed Saleh, a 56-year-old father of three children, said he returned to find his home a "pile of rubble," which cannot be rebuilt until the government provides the money. With no indication of when that might happen, authorities have resettled his family in another house whose owner is believed unlikely to return before this summer.

Saleh earns less than $15 a day cleaning and repairing other people's homes. There are no schools open for his children, and he lacks funds to return to a camp for internally displaced outside Baghdad where he says life was better.

Obama administration officials say they have been working to help stabilize Iraq politically and economically since the military campaign against Islamic State began in 2014.

"The success of the campaign against ISIL in Iraq does depend upon political and economic progress as well," Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Monday. "Economically it's important that the destruction that's occurred be repaired and we're looking to help the Iraqis with that."

Asked about the upcoming $400 million U.N. request, Horne said the United States welcomed the new fund's establishment and "will continue to lead international efforts to fund stabilization operations." The United States hasn't yet announced what it will contribute.

U.S. officials said Washington is also pushing for an International Monetary Fund arrangement that the head of the fund's Iraq mission has said could unlock up to $15 billion in international financing. Baghdad has a $20 billion budget deficit caused by depressed oil prices.

Washington has helped train 15,000 Sunni fighters who are now part of the Iraqi government's security forces.

But there has been little movement on political reforms to reconcile minority Sunnis, whose repression under former prime minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shiite-led government led thousands to join Islamic State.

Unless that happens, and Sunnis see that Baghdad is trying to help them return home to rebuild, support for the militants will persist, experts said.

"If you don't get reconciliation, the Sunnis will turn back to ISIS," said former CIA and White House official Kenneth Pollack, who is now at the Brookings Institution think tank and conducted a fact-finding mission in Iraq last month.

"It's just inevitable."

The United States has prevailed militarily in Iraq before, only to see the fruits of the effort evaporate.

President George W. Bush invaded Iraq in 2003, deposed dictator Saddam Hussein and disbanded his army without a comprehensive plan for post-war stability. Civil war ensued.


REBUILDING GETS HARDER

International funding to rebuild towns and cities ravaged by Islamic State has always been tight, said Grande, deputy special representative of the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq.

"This meant we had to come up with a model that could be implemented quickly and at extremely low cost," she said.

International donors contributed $100 million to an initial fund to jump-start local economies, restoring power and water and reopening shops and schools.

The model worked in Tikrit, the first major city reclaimed from Islamic State in March 2015, Grande said. After initial delays, most residents returned, utilities are on and the university is open. Total spending was $8.3 million.

But Ramadi, a city of some 500,000 people before the recent fighting, poses a much greater challenge.

"Much of the destruction that's happening in areas that are being liberated ... far outstrips our original assumptions," Grande said.

Restoring normality to Mosul, home to about 2 million people before it fell to Islamic State, could prove even more difficult.

It remains to be seen whether Islamic State digs in, forcing a ruinous battle, or faces an internal uprising that forces the militants to flee, sparing the city massive devastation.

If Islamic State is defeated militarily, it likely will revert to the guerrilla tactics of its predecessor, al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), current and former officials said.

AQI and its leaders, including Islamic State chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, "survived inside Iraq underground for years and there’s no reason they couldn’t do it again," a U.S. defense official said.


(Additional reporting by David Rohde, Lou Charbonneau and John Walcott. Editing by Stuart Grudgings.)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-coalition-needed-in-order-to-crush-isis.html

isis

Top general: 50,000-troop coalition needed in order to crush ISIS

By Catherine Herridge · Published April 13, 2016 · FoxNews.com
Comments 1808

It will take a coalition of 50,000 troops on the ground to defeat the Islamic State, according to the former army chief of staff who spent more than four years serving in Iraq and who is credited, along with retired General David Petraeus, with being the architect of the successful 2007 troop surge there.

"Probably around 50,000," said Gen. Raymond T. Odierno during a panel discussion moderated by Fox News for the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Odierno, who received the George P. Shultz award for distinguished service, emphasized the 50,000 would not all be U.S. troops, but the coalition would need to be U.S.- led.

While the general, who commanded all U.S. forces from 2008 to 2010, said he supports a unified country, he added the U.S. government needs to consider whether Iraq has already been divided into three sectors by the sectarian violence -- Shia, Sunni and Kurd. Odierno fingered the newly emboldened Iran as a primary agitator.

"Today, I think it's becoming harder and harder to have a unified Iraq,” he said. “And the reason is I believe the influence of Iran inside of Iraq is so great, they will never allow the Sunnis to participate in a meaningful way in the government. If that doesn't happen, you cannot have a unified Iraq."

Odierno, who argued for leaving 20,000 troops in Iraq but met resistance from several senior Obama administration officials as well as then Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki, said the decision to pull out became a self-inflicted wound.

The withdrawal made it harder, if not impossible, for the U.S. government to independently assess what was happening on the ground, at a time when the alienation of the Sunni population fueled the rise of ISIS.

"We lost what we call our human intelligence network on the ground,” he said. “I mean we used to have a pretty significant human intelligence operation. So as we pulled out, our U.S. military, we lose it. So we have to depend on Iraqis, which they collect intelligence, but they do it a little bit differently than we do and they look for different things."

Speaking at the CIA Wednesday, President Obama touted the air campaign against ISIS, though Odierno said air power can only go so far, and working with the local Iraqis was the cornerstone of the surge.

When he was in Iraq, Odierno had first-hand knowledge of the ISIS leader Omar al-Baghdadi, who, at the time was a nondescript bomb maker with control over small Baghdad neighborhoods.

"We had captured him a couple of times, released him. He then fled to, I think, Syria. And then he shows (up) - and all of a sudden, I see him on TV making a pronouncement that he's the head of ISIS," Odierno recalled. "You have these individuals who've grown up now fighting the U.S. or whatever - an insurgency - and that becomes their life. And so they continue to grow and grow and grow and some of them become leaders of a movement, which is what he did.”

The retired general continued to sound the alarm about military cuts, saying the army has "lost capability" at a time when the likelihood of responding to threats on five continents is not hypothetical.

At the same time, the number of American troops dropped from over 100,000 to 50,000. In 2015, the White House sent 450 military advisers to train and assist Iraqi forces battling ISIS, with 5,000 troops.

Fox News' William Turner contributed to this report.


Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Talk about being about time....Now we'll see if it actually gets delivered.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...a-as-Mosul-ground-battle-looms/4591460629399/

U.S. arms Kurdish Peshmerga as Mosul ground battle looms

By Andrew V. Pestano Follow @AVPLive9 Contact the Author | April 14, 2016 at 6:54 AM

BAGHDAD, April 14 (UPI) -- The U.S. coalition fighting against the Islamic State in Iraq has begun arming the Kurdish Peshmerga with heavy weapons as the battle for Mosul intensifies.

The Kurdish Peshmerga have received armored personnel carriers, mortars and anti-tank weapons to combat the Islamic State as the ground assault to recapture Mosul looms.

"We have decided to give them about two U.S. Army brigades-worth of equipment -- heavier stuff," Brig. Gen. John E. Novalis II, who is overseeing coalition training of Iraqi security forces, told Stars and Stripes.

The Kurds have often complained that the weapons they use are inferior to the weapons the Islamic State seized when it drove away Iraqi security forces who left weapons and machinery behind. Iraqi officials have expressed worry that arming Kurds directly could later lead to an increased conflict in the Kurdish ambition to establish an independent Kurdish state.

But U.S. Army Col. Steve Warren on Wednesday told reporters that any U.S. weapons delivered to the Kurds would be sent through the Iraqi government.

"One-hundred percent of the arms and equipment that we provide goes through the central government of Iraq," Warren said during a press conference. "There will be times when, of course, there's coordination ... but it all goes through the central government of Iraq. The central government decides where every piece of equipment goes."

Related UPI Stories
•Islamic State destroys gates of Nineveh near Mosul
•Kerry makes surprise visit to Baghdad as Iraqi confidence in Abadi wanes
•U.S. may open 'fire bases' to help Iraqi troops retake Mosul
 
50K troops or a few tact nukes? I'll give up the so-called civilians over there to save the lives of the US soldiers this time.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-raid-idUSKCN0XF1HT

World | Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:21am EDT
Related: World, Iraq

U.S.-led raids in Iraq kill and capture Islamic State fighters

ERBIL, Iraq | By Isabel Coles

A member of Islamic State's war council and two aides were killed in northern Iraq on Monday by U.S. and Kurdish commandos in the second helicopter raid in two days in the area by a U.S.-led coalition, Kurdish security sources said.

A statement by the Kurdish regional security council said Monday's raid south of the Iraqi city of Mosul killed Suleiman Abd Shabib al-Jabouri, also known as Abu Saif.

As a member of the militant group's war council, the statement said, he had been responsible for offensives in Makhmour, 80 km (50 miles) from Mosul, where an Iraqi army push launched last month has stalled.

In a separate operation on Sunday, troops from a U.S.-led coalition landed a helicopter north of Mosul and seized at least one Islamic State member from a vehicle, witnesses and Kurdish security sources said.

The force quickly took off again with their captive, the sources told Reuters.

"It all happened in less than 10 minutes," said a witness of the raid in Badush district, around 20 km (12 miles) northwest of Mosul, the largest Iraqi city still in the hands of Islamic State.

A spokesman for the U.S. coalition could not immediately be reached for comment on the latest raid. He previously declined to confirm or deny reports of the earlier raid.

A news agency that supports Islamic State said the militants had thwarted the earlier raid in Badush.

There appears to be an increase in these sorts of operations since the United States announced last December it was deploying a new force of special operations troops to Iraq to conduct raids against Islamic State there and in neighbouring Syria.

The militant group's second-in-command and other senior leaders were likely killed last month by an air strike after a U.S. special forces' helicopter was fired on from the ground.

U.S. special forces operating with Kurdish commandos rescued 69 Iraqis in an October raid in the northern city of Hawija in which one U.S. soldier was killed.

The operations are aimed at escalating pressure on Islamic State after the Iraqi army won its first major victory over the insurgents last December in Ramadi.

The authorities have said they want to retake Mosul this year but Iraqi officials privately question whether this is possible.


(Additional reporting and writing by Stephen Kalin; Editing by Richard Balmforth)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Drip, drip, drip.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/carter-arrives-iraq-talks-beef-fight-065213023--politics.html

US to send 200 more troops, Apache helicopters, to Iraq

LOLITA C. BALDOR
April 18, 2016

BAGHDAD (AP) — The U.S. has agreed to deploy more than 200 additional troops to Iraq and to send Apache helicopters for the first time into the fight against the Islamic State group in Iraq, the first major increase in U.S. forces in nearly a year, U.S. defense officials said Monday.

The uptick in American fighting forces — and the decision to put them closer to the front lines — is designed to help Iraqi forces retake the key northern city of Mosul, and to help retake Raqqa, the extremist's group self-proclaimed capital in Syria. Last June the Obama administration announced that hundreds of troops would be deployed to help the Iraqis retake Ramadi — a goal they accomplished at the end of the year.

Of the additional troops, most would be Army special forces, who have been used throughout the anti-Islamic State campaign to advise and assist the Iraqis. The remainder would include some trainers, security forces for the advisers, and maintenance teams for the Apaches.

The decisions reflect weeks of discussions with commanders and Iraqi leaders, and a decision by President Barack Obama to increase the authorized troop level in Iraq by 217 forces — or from 3,870 to 4,087. The advise-and-assist teams — made up of about a dozen troops each accompanied by security forces — would embed with Iraqi brigades and battalion, likely putting them closer to the front lines and at greater risk from mortars and rocket fire.

The proximity to the battlefront will allow the U.S. teams to provide more tactical combat advice as the Iraqi units move toward Mosul, the country's second-largest city, still under Islamic State control. Until now, U.S. advisers have worked with the Iraqis at the headquarters level, well back from the front lines.

The Apache helicopters are considered a significant aid to any attack on Mosul.

Last December, U.S. officials were trying to carefully negotiate new American assistance with Iraqi leaders who often have a different idea of how to wage war. At that time, the Iraqis refused Apache helicopters for the battle to retake Ramadi.

Speaking to U.S. troops at the airport in Baghdad, Defense Secretary Ash Carter also said that the U.S. will send an additional rocket-assisted artillery system to Iraq.

U.S. officials have also said that the number of special operations forces in Syria would be increased at some point, but Carter did not mention that in his comments. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Carter's announcement Monday came after several meetings with his commanders and Iraqi leaders about how the U.S. can best help Iraqi forces retake Mosul.

He met with Lt. Gen. Sean MacFarland, the top U.S. military commander for the Islamic State fight, as well as a number of Iraqi leaders including Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi and Iraq's minister of defense Khalid al-Obeidi.

He also spoke by phone with the president of Iraq's autonomous Kurdish region, Massoud Barzani

Late last month, U.S. Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that he and Carter believed there would be an increase in U.S. forces in Iraq in the coming weeks.

Later this week, Obama will be in Saudi Arabia to talk with Gulf leaders about the fight against the Islamic State and ask for their help in rebuilding Ramadi, which took heavy damage in the battle.

U.S. military and defense officials also have made it clear that winning back Mosul is critical, but will be challenging, because the insurgents are dug in and have likely peppered the landscape with roadside bombs and other traps for any advancing military.

A senior defense official told reporters traveling with Carter that while Iraqi leaders have been reluctant to have a large number of U.S. troops in Iraq, they also need certain capabilities that only more American or coalition forces can provide.

Iraqi leaders, back the addition of more U.S. troops if their work is coordinated with Iraqis and directed toward the retaking of Mosul. The official was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly so spoke on condition of anonymity.

Iraq has been struggling with a political crisis, as efforts to oust the speaker of parliament failed. Al-Abadi's efforts to get a new cabinet in place met resistance, and influential Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr issued a deadline, giving parliament 72 hours to vote in a new Cabinet.

At the same time, the costs of the war against IS, along with the plunge in the price of oil — which accounts for 95 percent of Iraq's revenues — have caused an economic crisis, adding fresh urgency to calls for reform. Iraqi officials predict a budget deficit of more than $30 billion this year.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Obama Sends More Troops To Iraq;
Authorizes Use Of Apache Helicopters;
Gives $415 Million To Local Army



Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/18/2016 11:54 -0400
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...-use-apache-helicopters-gives-415-million-loc


Back in 2014 Obama promised that as part of the US war against ISIS, there would
be "no ground troops in Iraq." Moments ago U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter gave
the latest confirmation that Obama was not being exactly "honest", when during a
visit to Baghdad in which he met U.S. commanders, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider
al-Abadi, and Iraqi Defence Minister Khaled al-Obeidi, he announced that the US
would send another 200 additional troops, raising the number of U.S. troops in Iraq
to about 4,100.

This follows a report two weeks ago according to which the US would "greatly
increase" the number of special forces deployed to Syria under the same pretext: to
fight the same Islamic State, which only exists due to a CIA operation to destabilize
and overthrow Assad's regime in Syria.




To be sure, the incremental deployment to Iraq is not exactly surprising: at the end
of March, the Daily Beast reported that as many as 21 generals have been deployed
(to a war the US denies fighting). More:
There are at least 12 U.S. generals in Iraq, a stunningly high number for
a war that, if you believe the White House talking points, doesn’t involve
American troops in combat.
And that number is, if anything, a conservative
estimate, not taking into account the flag officers running the U.S. air
war, the admirals helping wage the war from the sea, or their superiors
back at the Pentagon.

At U.S. headquarters inside Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, even majors
and colonels frequently find themselves saluting superiors at a pace
that outranks the Pentagon and certainly any normal military installation.

With about 5,000 troops deployed to Iraq and Syria ISIS war, that means
there’s a general for every 416 troops, give or take.

To compare, there are some captains in the U.S. Army in charge of
that many people.


* * *

But if the U.S. footprint is so small, why does the war demand
so many generals?

This was our response on April 3: "Why so many generals to so few troops?"

Perhaps because, just like the Syrian "special forces" reinforcements,
the U.S. troops are about to be deployed in Iraq as well where they
will have more than enough generals to guide them
.

Sure enough, this is precisely what happened.

However, it's not just troops: as Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook says in tweet,
the DOD also announced the authority to employ AH-64 Apache helicopters
in support of operations to retake the city of Mosul in Iraq. DOD also will provide
additional advisers, more financial aid and firepower.

And then there is the money:
"To accelerate momentum" in fight
against Islamic State
, Defense Sec Ashton Carter “says we will provide
up to $415MM in financial assistance to Peshmerga fighters,”
Cook says in a tweet.

And, once again, as we asked rhetorically in April 3, all this begs the question:
"as the ongoing proxy war in the Middle East has been gradually pushed back
from the front pages, are all these stealthy reinforcements indicative
that something far bigger is about to be unleashed in the region."


This indeed appears to be the case: on Friday Reuters reported
that Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani had flown to Moscow for talks
with Russia's military and political leadership on Syria and deliveries of Russian
missiles, sources said on Friday. Soleimani met Russian President Vladimir Putin
and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu on Friday, one source said.

The main purpose of his visit was to discuss new delivery routes for
shipments of Russian S-300 surface-to-air missile systems, sources said.
Several sources also said Soleimani wanted to talk about how Russia
and Iran could help the Syrian government take back full control of
the city of Aleppo.

"General Soleimani traveled to Moscow last night to discuss issues
including the delivery of S-300s and further military cooperation,"
a senior Iranian security official told Reuters.
That is hardly all he is doing in Moscow: as a reminder, Soleimani, the commander
of foreign operations for Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, flew to Moscow in July
last year to help Russia plan its military intervention in Syria and forge an
Iranian-Russian alliance to support Syria's President Bashar al-Assad
.

We are confident he is doing the same now, and with the US deploying ever more
troops to the region, it is only a matter of time before Russia once again
reciprocates.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
^^^^

So they're going to finally directly support the Kurdish forces operating out of Irbil (300,000 of them in different factions)...The Iraqi government forces and their Shia militias haven't performed well at all in comparison to material support vs results.

There's another precedent for that many general officers being in theater without the troops; recall the generals, staff and training officers and personnel that went to Croatia as "contractors" during their part of the Yugoslav Civil War that got the Croatian forces tuned up and helped plan the 1993 and 1995 Croatian offensives (fueled with a lot of former DDR stocks from Germany IIRC) against the Serb dominated Yugoslav Federal Forces.

I'm thinking that they're rushing to get as much as possible done in Iraq before things "solidify" in Syria so that they're not having to deal with both issues at once at the "public" negotiating table.
 
Top