GOV/MIL Interview with Tom Fife who heard of a commie black president in 1992

Be Well

may all be well
This is only a link to an interview, I'm a computer idiot and I managed to download it and listen. Short summary - it is an interview with a host I am not familiar with, and one Tom Fife, who was in Russia in 1992 and at a dinner party, the wife of the Russian host described an African who would become President of the US, whose first name would be Barack, and many other details that happened just as she said. There has been an article about this floating around for a few years, but there is new info in the interview, and the host had some details of his own about Communist infiltration in the FBI.

http://www.trunews.com/listen_now.htm

It's the interview on Wednesday June 1.
 
My wonderful Father, who was a veteran of WWII (Anzio Beach) preached to me ALL my life til his death in 95, that "IT WILL BE THE RUSSIANS".

I've never forgot it and I am always looking for verifiable sources to this very strict direct comment that my Dad was hard pressed about.
Thanks for the link.
Blessing's,
MCA
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
i remember reading this a year or so ago i believe.
thanks for finding it.
we have a soviet agent in the WH.
more like a double/triple agent working for Jihad imho.

from the link:

The First Time I Heard of Barack
Written by Thomas Fife
by Tom Fife

During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid 1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of ....

....starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.

V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause – a cause she obviously was not abandoning.

One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.

As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge – one her husband tried to quietly rein in.


The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:


“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn’t do it.”


The general response went something along the lines that you don’t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don’t vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.


“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”


The consensus we expressed was that we didn’t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.


“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”

The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”


It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”


“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League”. You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.”

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”


We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he’d be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.


She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.

She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”


At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn’t understand what the point was and don’t recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.

Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘Blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African’”, she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”

She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.


So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?

Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.

Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.
 

Hacker

Computer Hacking Pirate
There has been a guest on Coast to Coast AM who talked about time-travel; and about the notion that TPTB knew what the future held for our world.

Speculation is that this 1992 prediction may have come from someone who traveled through time.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
There has been a guest on Coast to Coast AM who talked about time-travel; and about the notion that TPTB knew what the future held for our world.

Speculation is that this 1992 prediction may have come from someone who traveled through time.



:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

inynmn

Inactive
Read this rumor years ago.

I suppose Mr. Fife is genuine and he really experienced what he says he did.

However, the story follows a familiar narrative.

It warns of "socialism" - that the current administration is socialist, or the most socialist / marxist.
The original socialist president president (and his wife, unabashed) is Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The interview warns of the total socialization of IOUSA, made me laugh.
We have been socialist for decades and hardly anyone complained (especially those on the receiving end) until recently, because all the socialist ponzi schemes are about to collapse due to demographics, the birth rate can not support the hundred millions of entitled masses.
This is a world wide phenomena and our current economic situation is no surprise, there have been warnings for decades.

The future was already ruined years before the last election.

What about other past administrations ? A lot of Americans do not admire President Nixon or his boss Kissinger. Or President Carter. President George Bush Jr gifted IOUSA with the multi TRILLION dollar medicare prescription "plan". What about President Clinton and all the scandals of that administration? Or NAFTA, et al ?

All administrations have had their highs and lows.
 

Adino

paradigm shaper
If any haven't heard about the documentary "Agenda: Grinding America Down" you should check it out.

Outlines and details the commie infiltration of US to topple the Republic from within.

Perfectly segues with this story.

Communism DID NOT DIE. It went underground and moved its heart to DC.
 

jed turtle

a brother in the Lord
If any haven't heard about the documentary "Agenda: Grinding America Down" you should check it out.

Outlines and details the commie infiltration of US to topple the Republic from within.

Perfectly segues with this story.

Communism DID NOT DIE. It went underground and moved its heart to DC.

that's why the Berlin Wall came down. the West was ripe for conversion to communism...
 

Be Well

may all be well
0bama has deep connections with Communism. Here's one article, Trevor Loudon is a great researcher, check his other articles.

http://trevorloudon.com/

New research from writers and researchers

Panetta Hearing for SecDef Thursday: Obama CIA Director Linked to Spies Thru Communist Party Figure

Trevor Loudon and Cliff Kincaid shows that Leon Panetta, the CIA director being considered on Thursday for the position of Secretary of Defense, had a previously undisclosed personal and friendly relationship with Hugh DeLacy, a prominent member of the Communist Party USA. DeLacy visited such countries as China and Nicaragua and was himself a personal contact of identified Soviet spies Solomon Adler and Frank Coe and accused spy John Stewart Service. Panetta spoke at DeLacy’s memorial service, directed a series of letters to him personally as “Dear Hugh,” and placed a tribute to him in the Congressional Record.


Former Washington State Rep. DeLacy, named by Communist Party lawyer John Abt as a fellow member of the party, remained a communist operative until his death in 1986.

One “Dear Hugh” letter from then-Rep. Panetta to DeLacy offered a summary of a report on U.S. military operations that Panetta said was “unavailable for distribution.” Panetta concludes the March 24, 1977, letter, “If there is anything I can do for you in the future, Hugh, please feel free to call on me.”

The Panetta SecDef hearing is being held June 9 by the Senate Armed Services Committee at 9:30 a.m. in open session in Room SD-G50 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, with a closed session later in the day in Room SVC-217, the Office of Senate Security in the Capitol Visitor Center.

Like DeLacy, Panetta shared a preference for communist regimes in Latin America, including the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. DeLacy had visited Nicaragua and had honored the Sandinistas, who were pawns of the Soviets and Cubans in Central America, while Panetta, as a member of Congress in 1983, strongly opposed President Reagan’s effort to undermine the Sandinista regime through CIA covert action. In addition, Panetta actively collaborated with the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a Washington, D.C. think tank that provided a cover for Chilean Marxist and Cuban agent Orlando Letelier to conduct communist political influence operations in the nation’s capital. Panetta, a member of Congress from 1977 to 1993, was a vocal opponent of Chile’s anti-communist government. In 1986, Panetta publicly endorsed protests against Reagan’s “illegal and extraordinarily vicious wars against the poor of Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala.”

“Panetta’s bias in favor of revolutionary Marxist movements in Latin America helps explain why the CIA has been spectacularly unsuccessful in stopping the advance of Hugo Chavez and his minions south of the U.S. border,” Trevor Loudon and Cliff Kincaid said in a joint statement. “His only apparent success as CIA director has been the killing of Obama bin Laden, an impressive operation that has nevertheless backfired in the sense of sending a nuclear-armed Pakistan into the arms of Communist China.”

“It is astounding that Panetta was confirmed as Obama’s CIA director without any of this being considered by the U.S. Senate,” Loudon and Kincaid went on. “But now that Panetta is set to move on to another critical national security post — Secretary of Defense — with new Senate hearings being held on Thursday, it is time to get all of this information out in the open. One of the most important matters that deserves scrutiny is Panetta’s apparent failure to be forthcoming about his personal relationship with DeLacy. It is time for the Senate to investigate this previously undisclosed relationship.”

Loudon and Kincaid, writers and researchers on national security issues, have assembled critical information about Panetta from important sources that have apparently been overlooked by Senate investigators and even FBI agents who investigated Panetta’s background. Among these sources, Loudon reviewed the Hugh DeLacy papers at the University of Washington, while Kincaid examined hearings conducted on “Communist Political Subversion” by the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities and “Un-American Activities in California” by the California Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities.

“When this information is examined in context,” Loudon and Kincaid stated, “it is clear that Panetta, whose nomination to be CIA director was considered mystifying even to those in the intelligence business, has been a key component of a network of left-wing activists and socialist organizations for over two decades. These individuals and groups include not only Hugh DeLacy and his communist associates but the communist-dominated Progressive Party, Democratic Socialists of America and the neo-Marxist New American Movement. Panetta, in short, was a player in the network that sponsored the political career of a young Barack Obama in Chicago. This helps explain why Panetta was picked, seemingly out of nowhere, for the CIA job.”

(Loudon, who runs the New Zeal blog http://trevorloudon.com/, and Kincaid, president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org , specialize in researching and reporting on anti-American extremist political movements with foreign connections, funding, and sponsorship.)

For further information contact Trevor Loudon on 202 506 8733 and/or trevor.newzeal@gmail.com

For back up documentation go to www.usasurvival.org



The site KeyWiki has "the rest of the story" background info on various public figures and their socialist/communist connections, backgrounds, statements, and so on:

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Main_Page
 
Top