Funny how they're tracking our vax status. Wonder if they're going to start tracking our erectile dysfunction status too. Or maybe our boob implants or toupee's. What about our anal leakage and adult diapers.
Royal bunch of arseholes these people are.
"He" who "owns the gold," rules.
Insurance companies typically set their rates according to how much they will have to pay out versus how much they will be able to net-net profit.
Is this simply a revenue opportunity "grab," while the actual payout costs for the unvaccinated individual's care are low, and costing little to the insurance companies?
Or, are they anticipating a pending/future cost of care for unvaccinated individual policyholders?
Normally, the insurance companies are profit driven - not "politics" driven (per se).
intothegoodnight
ETA: OR, are the insurance companies aware of the possibility that there are MANY more unvaccinated individuals (despite the false data reported by TPTB) versus the smaller number of individuals who have taken the "vaccination," and expect the smaller number of vaccinated individual's medical bills to be de facto "picked up" by the MUCH larger number of unvaccinated medically insured via higher insurance premiums?
THAT scenario would fit a more typical and expected profit-driven behavior from medical insurance companies, by charging the expected majority "healthy" MORE than the expected minority "unhealthy," ahead of time.
Since vaxed are likely to die of vax damage or related things, and insurance has no responsibility for that, they truly are less expensive to insure than the unvaxed who will get the usual sorts of problems that insurance will have to pay for.
Another possibility, also.