SCI 'Find of the century': medieval hoard of treasures unearthed in Cambridge [Dark Ages]

Melodi

Disaster Cat
The Guardian tends to use copy-protect on their photographs (some copy and some don't) so this article may be best viewed at the link. I THINK this is the same excavation that I posted about a couple of months ago but I'm not sure, either way, they are both windows into the 6th century, just the Post-Roman period in England. I notice some of the burials show some continuation of Roman customs and others do not, which adds fuel to the theory (noted in the articles about the Roman buildings and Mosaics constructed in the "post-Roman" period, that cultures combined rather than were totally conquered and replaced by the Saxons).

Also, the "Plague of Justinian" they will be testing the bodies for is now known to be a wave of Yersinia Pestis (The Black Death) with slightly different symptoms, that may also have killed at least 1/3 of Europe in the 6th Century the same way it would later do in the 14th, but research on that is still ongoing. The DNA information is fairly new and sites are older sites from Turkey to Scandinavia are still being tested for this.

- Melodi

'Find of the century': medieval hoard of treasures unearthed in Cambridge
Graves found under demolished student halls are providing valuable insight into life in a post-Roman settlement
A man in a hard hat and hi-vis clothing bending over a partly unearthed skeleton in the ground

The human remains found at the Cambridge site are remarkably well preserved in the alkaline soil. Photograph: Albion Archaeology

Donna Ferguson
Sat 30 Jan 2021 15.40 GMT


428

An early medieval graveyard unearthed beneath student accommodation at Cambridge University has been described as “one of the most exciting finds of Anglo-Saxon archaeology since the 19th century”.
King’s College discovered the “extensive” cemetery, containing more than 60 graves, after demolishing a group of 1930s buildings which had recently housed graduates and staff in the west of the city, to make way for more modern halls.



Friar crushed by cart: bone analysis hints at causes of medieval deaths
Read more

Around 200 items in the graves, including bronze brooches, bead necklaces, swords, short blades, pottery and glass flasks, have been systematically uncovered. Most date from the early Anglo-Saxon period (c400-650 CE), although evidence of iron age structures and Roman earthworks has also been found.
Dr Caroline Goodson, who teaches early medieval history at King’s, said the human remains they found were remarkably “well preserved”. “The alkaline soil, which is typical around here, hasn’t decomposed the bones.”
This is significant, because it will enable archaeologists to apply very modern scientific techniques to reveal the diet and DNA of the dead, permitting analysis of migration and family relationships.
Goodson said excavators had been “surprised” to find so many graves and such an extensive early medieval cemetery surrounded by Roman ditches and so close to the remains of Roman Cambridge. According to Bede’s Ecclesiastical History, which was written in the eighth century, Cambridge was abandoned – like many other Roman towns – when the Romans withdrew their military forces from England during the 5th century. “We already know that Cambridge wasn’t fully abandoned. But what we’re seeing now is a greater and clearer picture of life in the post-Roman settlements.”
An egg-shaped dark glass flask with moulded sides next to a ruler showing its size

A late Roman glass flask found at the site. Photograph: Albion Archaeology
Goodson speculates that people living in Cambridgeshire were a mix of descendants from earlier Roman populations and recent migrants to Britain from the continent, living in a post-imperial world. “They are no longer living as the Romans did, they’re eating differently, dressing differently and finding different ways of exploiting the land. They are changing the way they are living during a period of considerable fluidity.”
Some of the finds throw up questions about the emotional connections people living at the time of the burials may have felt towards the Romans who lived in Cambridge before them. In one grave, archaeologists found a body buried with what appears to be a late Roman piece of glass shaped like a small barrel for storing wine. “It looks like a classic Roman object being reused in a post-Roman context, as grave goods.” Another grave looks like a typical late Roman burial from the fifth century, suggesting there may have been continuity of use of the burial ground from the Roman period onwards. “That would be really interesting,” said Goodson.
Aerial view of a patch of bare ground next to a leafy suburban street in Cambridge

The site of the dig, in the west of the city. Photograph: Dronescapes
So far archaeologists have not found “strong evidence” that people living in the sixth century were still choosing to bury their dead near late Roman graves, but few graveyards of this size have ever been scientifically excavated using modern methods and technologies, such as advanced radiocarbon dating techniques and isotopic analysis. “It would be great to say very clearly – and we’re going to need an ample suite of carbon-14 dates to do this – that we’ve got people using this site from the fifth until the seventh century,” says Goodson. “We can see that the burial of the dead and the treatment of their bodies is particularly significant to the living in a way that is different from elsewhere in the post-Roman world.” That points to a different world view and a different “cosmology”: “It’s a new form of commemoration.”
She hopes to find out whether anyone in the cemetery died of the Justinianic plague, a pandemic that raged across Europe in the 540s.
“I’m really interested to find out whether it was in Cambridge, too, and how much that relates to what else was going on.”
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
People got shorter in the Migration Age (Dark Ages) and into the Vendal Age (late Dark Ages going into about 1000 AD).

The theory is that it was because the Climate Changed (it really did) it got much colder and people were forced to spend a lot more time indoors breathing smoky air - we know it did bad things to their lungs and sinuses (that can show on the skeleton) and it is suspected it affected height as well.

Especially in places like what is now the United Kingdom where late period hunters and gatherers (10,000 to 8,000 years ago) and early farmers (8,000 to about 5,000 years ago) tended to be tall (men 6 feet, women 5 8" in some places).

Romans on the other hand, like Southern Europeans today, tended to be short.
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Cool!

Man they were tiny back then... Or are those children's skeletons?
Might be the camera angle. Nevertheless I agree with Melodi, here. In certain eras, people were mostly tiny. I tend to think of herders as tall, and grain farmers as short, but that might be an oversimplification. A group of Caucasian mummies in China (yes, they were there) were very tall, even by today's Scandinavian standards (I'd pull the book out, but it is in a stack of totes right now.)

The whole topic is something of a pet peeve with me, due to the woke insistence that American and European 19th century women were the same sizes we are today. The costume historians are bending over backwards insisting that all the extant tiny dresses are from very young teens, or were preserved because they didn't fit that many women. Whatever. These clothes gals never go back to the skeletons.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Quite a number of the armor that still exists from the High Middle Ages and slightly later shows just how small even muscled fighting men could be. While you have some very tall people for the time Richard the Lion-Hearted (at least 6 feet) or Edward the Black Prince (also 6 feet plus) these were giants compared to the more common 5'4" to 5'8."

Knights had to be strong enough to wear basically a tin can of metal for hours on end, seated on horseback and able to take powerful blows from deadly weapons aimed directly at them, yet their average height was about 5'6".

During the early "Dark Ages" armor was still pretty light and warfare was mostly on foot (people rode into battle and then ditched the horses). This is probably why you still have a good number of women warriors during this period (next door in Ireland it was a wife's responsibility to give her sons their first sword training before Daddy took over), this changes very quickly as armies move into mounted tin cans.

Again, Roman Britianna got both legacies; an early period where women traditional were fighters back when chariots and daring-do showing off counted as much as killing the enemy but followed by a Roman tradition of brutal all mail military forces that preferred winning battles to showing off.

But during the period of this graveyard, we know some women were fighters because their graves have started to be found, though the most famous XENA (about 6th century) was about 6 feet tall and must have towered over nearly everyone around her.
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
I seem to have read that during WWI, the Brit army was astounded to find that a large % of their personnel were too short to keep up marching with regular troops. They could not make the standard 30" (?) step. So they were organized into their own battalions.

I don't know what the cutoff size was but it had to be small by today's standards.
 

subnet

Boot
I seem to have read that during WWI, the Brit army was astounded to find that a large % of their personnel were too short to keep up marching with regular troops. They could not make the standard 30" (?) step. So they were organized into their own battalions.

I don't know what the cutoff size was but it had to be small by today's standards.
Hell, that happens all the time, the little end always falls behind....:lkick:
 

marsofold

Veteran Member
I have always believed that height is very strongly related to protein intake. The tall vikings had high levels of protein due to eating fish. I once was at a Bible study where the guest was from Kenya. He was a 6'6" man who claimed to be the shortest in his family. Their diet was 75% beef, while the short neighboring pygmies mostly ate starchy low protein plants. Also, a history of continuous wars tend to remove shorter warriors from the gene pool.
 

homecanner1

Veteran Member
I'd heard same thing about France and height, that Napoleonic recruiting wiped out whole villages of their tallest sons. Genetics suffered ever after.

Melodi didn't the long bowman have to be of a certain height to maneuver those on foot???

Ditto for the Scottish claymores, those blades are as long as me! Full upper body development to thrust with skill.

photo too large for uploading

d2blgbk-ceed757a-fa12-49d1-abcb-4fe48b87f662.jpg (3648×2736) (wixmp.com)

great thread!!!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
My grandmother (of colonial English, Welsh and Dutch ancestry) was not even 5 feet tall. My other grandmother (100% Bavarian and Hessian German ancestry) was 5 ft. 9 inches tall. I have one grandson out of 3 who is expected to be about 5'6" inches tall, which is short for men in my family. The other grandson is expected to be well over 6 feet tall.

It is more genetics than diet.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
The diet affects how the genetic potentials will be expressed, which is why you can have entire nations (like Japan) who were known for being very short on their traditional diets suddenly having a portion of the population "shoot up" a generation after a much higher protein diet was introduced.

My professor's extended family in Japan was still very small, but he and his sister were about 6'4" (him) and her about 5'9."

Individuals will always vary, I have one grandmother (and my last living aunt) who were/are 6 feet and I'm 4'8" but my Mom was only 5 feet and my other aunt 5'2".

I'm afraid I'm over my head when it comes to specific weapons questions (Nightwolf would know a lot more) but I think with the longbow it was also about having very strong arms and since people practiced from childhood I'm guessing bows varied in size but that is a guess.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I claim dibs on any jewels found.

Ancestry traces back to King Henry II. Through his daughter.

Seems like they spent everything before it got to me, so maybe this will make up for that.

This along with the money from Uncle Joe, I'll be rich, I tell you, rich.
 
Top