CORONA Fauci, NIH, knew about HCQ as a 'potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread' in 2005

alchemike

Veteran Member
Check out the article below but more importantly, the official NIH publication form August, 2005.
It is linked HERE.

I had a strong feeling that something like this must have been going on because the smear and demonization campaign against Hydroxychloroquine was so fast, widespread and coordinated that there was no way it was organic. This for a well understood drug that has been used effectively for over 50 years.

Now this official NIH document proves it. Fauci was already head of NIH in 2005. He has been deeply compromised for years all the way back to his extremely dubious involvement in early HIV research.

CDC is a vaccine company more than some virtuous global health watchdog. The CDC and WHO are both compromised by big pharma.


o)<

mike


Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 -- nobody needed to die
Monday, April 27, 2020
|
Bryan Fischer - Guest Columnist
Focal Point - Bryan Fischer

Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak - caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV - the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.

The Virology Journal - the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health - published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading - get ready for this - “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report...that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci


This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”

Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.

He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “rare and minor” adverse events. “In conclusion,” these researchers write, “we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.”
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort. HCQ wasn’t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent. Plus, HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective. At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.

But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6, the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit, and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.

Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.

On March 23, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100% success rate. That’s not the “anecdotal” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.

“Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intubations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”

Said Dr. Zelenko:
"If you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker. The country will open again. And let me tell you a very important point. This treatment costs about $20. That’s very important because you can scale that nationally. If every treatment costs $20,000, that’s not so good.

All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting."

The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done? Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.

While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection, from a medical standpoint, this is stupid. Said one doctor, “As a physician, this baffles me. I can’t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial, fungal, or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.”

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9, by which time 33,000 people had died.

This may be why: “Chloroquine, a relatively safe, effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases...is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS CoV.” That’s the problem. It is safe, inexpensive, and it works - in other words, there’s nothing sexy or avant-garde about HCQ. It’s been around since 1934.

Given human nature, it’s possible, even likely, that those who are chasing the unicorn of a coronavirus vaccine are doing so for reasons other than human health. I can’t see into anybody’s heart, and can’t presume to know their motives, but on the other hand, human nature recognizes that there’s no glory in pushing HCQ, and nobody is going to get anything named for him in the history books. The polio vaccine was developed by Jonas Salk in 1954, and it is still known as the “Salk vaccine.” There will be no “Fauci vaccine” if HCQ is the answer to the problem.

So while Dr. Fauci is tut-tutting and pooh-poohing HCQ, Dr. Raoult and Dr. Zelensky are out there saving lives at $20 a pop. Maybe we should spend more time listening to them than the wizards-of-smart bureaucrats the Talking Snake Media fawns over.
Dr. Fauci is regarded by the Talking Snake Media as the Oracle at Delphi. The entire nation hangs on his every word. But if nobody is dying and nobody is locked down, his 15 minutes of fame fades to zero. Very few people are not going to be influenced by that prospect, especially when it’s easy to keep the attention of the public by continuing to feed the panic.

It should not be overlooked that there is no money in HCQ for Big Pharma since HCQ is a generic that can be manufactured so cheaply there is little profit margin in it. On the other hand, the payday for a vaccine will literally be off-the-charts. Who knows what kind of behind-the-scenes pressure is being put on Fauci and others in the health care establishment?

There is a monstrous reputational risk for those who will be found to have dismissively waved off a treatment that could have been used from the very beginning, even back on February 15 when Dr. Fauci said that the risk from Coronavirus was “minuscule.” How many lives could have been saved if the heads of our multi-billion dollar health care bureaucracy had been advocating for HCQ treatment from day one? We’ll never know. Instead, their advice has been dangerous and deadly in every sense of that word.

Someday - maybe even today - we will be able to identify the individuals who had the knowledge and expertise to make a global difference, but turned up their noses at the solution when it could have made all the difference in the world.
 

Tristan

Veteran Member
I also think going forward, if I were to come down with the wuhan flu, my doc WILL give me these meds or I will doc shop until I find one that will. This is insane.

2db
Since you (apparently) need to get on the HCQ regimen asap if you get the bug, perhaps the time to feel the doc out is now.
 

jward

passin' thru
We understood long before the CHINESE VIRUS entered the public square that the globalists were painted into a corner, and that their next moves would need to be as vicious as any other rabid rats fighting for it's life. We even understood they did not care how many they killed to achieve their salvation. In fact, killing many of us was just the icing on the crazy cake in their game plan.

So the only surprise isn't how long, deep or depraved the lies are, it's (for me at least) how successful they have managed to be. I wrote the ivory tower globalist and lunch room losers coalition off as third rate failures, impotent, incontinent and things of derision --- but they've shown me they still had a few drops of destruction left in those fangs of theirs after all.
I've made note and adjusted my game plan accordingly. I hope I have plenty of company.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment

A Glitch in the Matrix: “Spooky action at a distance.” **
by Vanderleun on May 6, 2020

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUEa9jzVzu4&feature=emb_logo

Dead Zone, 2003 Episode Plague, Predicts Coronavirus Outbreak and Chloroquine Cure


“The CDC would have figured it out but not in time. “ This is a clip summarizing a 2003 episode of a TV show called Dead Zone, the episode name is Plague. During the episode, someone takes a flight in from China into the US and they come down with an unknown virus. After identifying the virus as a SARS related Coronavirus, one doctor figures out that they can stop the Coronavirus dead in its tracks using a malaria drug called Chloroquine.
[** Einstein’s ‘spooky action at a distance’ One of the strangest aspects of quantum physics is entanglement: If you observe a particle in one place, another particle—even one light-year away—will instantly change its properties, as if the two are connected by a mysterious communication channel.]
 

niceguy

Senior Member
I hate Fauci as much as the next guy, but the paper published in 2005 was an in vitro test - it was cells in a petri dish. SARS was done in 2004, they never needed to take it any further - no patients to test on.
 
I hate Fauci as much as the next guy, but the paper published in 2005 was an in vitro test - it was cells in a petri dish. SARS was done in 2004, they never needed to take it any further - no patients to test on.
With that information, shouldn’t they have considered testing it against today’s Coronavirus pretty early on?
 

Tristan

Veteran Member
I hate Fauci as much as the next guy, but the paper published in 2005 was an in vitro test - it was cells in a petri dish. SARS was done in 2004, they never needed to take it any further - no patients to test on.

No patients to test on, and no patents to apply for.

They've been saying for years that another outbreak was inevitable. Billions were spent. So why are they so damned unprepared?

Incompetence?
Corruption?
Perfidy?
 
Top