INTL FARC, Colombian government announce end to decades-long conflict

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.dw.com/en/farc-colombian-government-announce-end-to-decades-long-conflict/a-19501358

South America

FARC, Colombian government announce end to decades-long conflict

The Colombian government has reached a historic truce with the armed rebel group. An insurgency has been ongoing in the country for decades, leaving hundreds of thousands of people dead.

Date 24.08.2016

Negotiators from both the government side and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) announced that a deal had been reached on Wednesday evening in Havana, Cuba, effectively ending Latin America's last major guerrilla war.

The two sides have been working in recent weeks to finalize the last details of the accord, which early details suggest commits the government to carry out radical land reform, overhaul its anti-narcotics strategy and expand the state into various neglected areas of the country. The final text of the accord has yet to be published, however.

After several years of a government campaign to weaken the FARC militarily, negotiations started in November 2012, but were stymied for some time by distrust built up during decades of war propaganda on both sides.

A breakthrough came last September when Santos traveled to Havana to lay out a framework for investigating atrocities, punishing guerrillas for involvement in those abuses and offering compensation to victims.

Kolumbien Präsident Juan Manuel Santos
President Juan Manuel Santo has hailed the agreemet as "historic"

'Historic' deal

The war, which began in 1964, is the last major armed conflict in the Americas. It has killed 260,000 people, uprooted 6.8 million and left 45,000 missing.

"Today I hope to give historic, very important news to the country," President Juan Manuel Santos said earlier in the day.

The accord must now be ratified by voters in a plebiscite, which could take place as early as next month. Polls show Colombians would likely endorse any deal in a simple yes or no vote.

Low voter turnout is a concern because a minimum of 13 percent of the electorate, or about 4.4 million voters, must vote in favor for the accord to be ratified.


Watch video 06:35

Colombia: With FARC rebels in the jungle

Lingering concerns

The opposition is also reportedly likely to try to convert the vote into a referendum on Santos, whose approval rating plummeted to 21 percent in May according to a Gallup poll, the lowest since he took office in 2010.

Various polls have indicated that most Colombians associate the FARC with narco-terrorism due to its heavy involvement in the cocaine trade. The FARC for its part has retained a Cold War-era view of Colombia's political and economic establishment as "oligarchs" at the service of the US.

Many Colombians are horrified that the guerrillas who confess their crimes won't spend any time in prison and will instead be allowed to serve out reduced sentences of no more than eight years helping rebuild communities hit by the conflict.

Meanwhile, the government is still fighting a smaller rebel group, the National Liberation Army (ELN), whose ongoing kidnappings have derailed efforts to open peace negotiations.

jbh, blc/kl (dpa, AP, AFP)

DW recommends

Colombia, rebels seek help of Pope Francis, UN chief with peace court

The Colombian government and leftist FARC rebels have asked Pope Francis and the UN secretary-general for help in reaching a historic peace accord. A special war crimes court is one of the last sensitive issues. (13.08.2016)

Colombian rebel unit vows to keep fighting despite peace deal

A unit of Colombia's FARC rebel group says it won't lay down its arms, despite a recently signed peace deal with the government. President Santos has warned anyone who fails to get on board will end up dead or in prison. (07.07.2016)

Colombia: What impact will the historic ceasefire have on the media?

Latin America's longest-running armed conflict has effectively come to an end. The goal now is to prepare Colombians for a post-war era. DW Akademie is supporting local media in areas most affected by the conflict. (29.06.2016)

Audios and videos on the topic

Colombia: With FARC rebels in the jungle

Date 24.08.2016
Keywords FARC, Colombia, Bogota, guerrilla
Share Facebook Twitter Google+ More
Feedback: Send us an e-mail. Please include your name and country in your reply.
Print Print this page
Permalink http://dw.com/p/1JpC2


Date 24.08.2016
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.businessinsider.com/what...a-farc-peace-deal-agreement-plebiscite-2016-8

Colombia has reached a historic deal to end a 52-year war, but the next battle will be at the ballot box

Christopher Woody
50m
935

Colombia's years-long effort to end the civil conflict that has plagued the country for 52 years reached an important milestone on Wednesday, with the country's government and the left-wing Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) coming to an agreement on a peace deal.

"They have a definitive accord to end the war," Bernard Aronson, the US envoy to the talks, told reporters early on Wednesday, according to The Washington Post.

The agreement was announced on Wednesday evening, and though it has been the culmination of years of work, one significant hurdle remains: Getting the approval of the Colombian population in a nationwide plebiscite, a referendum on the deal.

Those opposed and in support of the deal have mounted campaigns to win over Colombians, but sentiments remain mixed. While many support an end to the conflict, others disagree with specific elements of the deal or doubt that it can be successfully implemented.

Getting to yes

The Colombian government must now secure approval from the public in a plebiscite, which must take place between one and four months of Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos' announcement to Congress that he intends to have it.

In order for the plebiscite to pass, it must get the support of 13% of Colombia's registered voters, or some 4.5 million people, and the yes votes must outnumber votes for no. While a yes victory would not change Colombian law, it would ensure legitimacy for the accord, show popular support, and provide strong assurances that what was agreed upon will be implemented.

The plebiscite would be binding on only the president, and while its failure would not mean that the peace process has to end, a no victory could be a debilitating blow to peace efforts, according to the Washington Office on Latin America.

The government still has to formally tell Congress of its intention to convene a plebiscite and when it intends to do so, but the Santos administration likely aims to convene a vote before the middle of October — reportedly on October 2 — which is when it has said that it would send to Congress a tax-reform proposal seen as essential to financing post-conflict programs.

In order to hold the plebiscite on this timetable, which is still uncertain, the government will be obligated to release the details to the public as soon as possible.

Several issues have become sticking points for the timing of the vote. FARC leadership still has to present the deal to the group's members for ratification. The rebels are expected to approve, but they have been reluctant to begin disarming and moving into designated concentration zones before a national vote is held, out of fears that, if it is voted down, then they could be left vulnerable.

Moreover, the sides have haggled over the timing of an amnesty law that would apply to the rebel group. FARC leaders have said that there will be no final deal without it, while the Colombian Congress must still decide what crimes the amnesty applies to.

The government has been working to inform the public about the deal, relying in large part on the country's TV and media companies.

Colombia Reports, an English-language Colombian news outlet, has called the news and opinion segments of said media companies "notoriously inaccurate and biased, and could end up confusing rather than informing the public."

Polls regarding the plebiscite have largely shown public support for the deal, but have not dispelled doubt about the outcome.

A survey conducted earlier this summer found that 80% of respondents knew little or nothing about several central components of the deal.

Polls conducted earlier this summer found the "Yes" side with a solid lead, but that margin has slimmed in recent weeks.

Some surveys conducted throughout the first half of August found "Yes" and "No" votes roughly tied, with "No" leading in some cases. A Gallup poll released on August 17 found "Yes" voters well ahead, with more than two-thirds of respondents who said they would or would likely vote telling pollsters that they would vote "Yes."

Anna Szterenfeld, the regional manager for Latin America at the Economist Intelligence Unit, has remained optimistic.

"We still believe that negotiations will be concluded soon, and that this, along with the government's significant campaign resources, will be enough to secure approval of the peace agreement in the plebiscite," Szterenfeld told Business Insider in early August.

"The logistics of the plebiscite — that only 13% of the electorate need vote 'yes' for the agreement to be approved — will also make this easier," Szterenfeld added.

'A lot of people are not happy'

The government of Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, who leaves office in 2018, will have to overcome a number of hurdles to secure the "Yes" vote it needs to implement the peace deal.

The government will have to win over Colombians who doubt the FARC will adhere to its commitments or that the government can eliminate the social and economic conditions that led to the conflict.

It must also sway those Colombians in urban areas, largely unaffected by the conflict, who have been more focused on economic conditions and have proven ambivalent about the peace process.

Santos himself has had low approval ratings in recent months, with his support falling to an all-time low in May.

An August survey found that 65% of Colombians disapproved of his management of the peace process and that 76% of his countrymen did not back his management during the first two years of his second term in office.

Dissatisfaction with Santos, the underperformance of the economy, and a vociferous "No" campaign have all helped push down public support for the deal in recent weeks.

"A lot of people are not happy with either ... some portion of the peace agreement and the condition of the economy," Szterenfeld told Business Insider in July. "Confidence is very low. So it's not a so surprising that his approval ratings are so low."

'Yes to peace, but not like this'

While many signs indicate that the "Yes" vote on the peace deal has the advantage, those opposed to the deal have made a concerted effort to defeat it at the ballot box.

The central figure in the campaign to defeat the referendum has been Alvaro Uribe, Colombia's president from 2002 to 2010, under whom Santos served as defense minister and constructed the campaign against the FARC that helped force the rebel group to the negotiating table in 2012.

Uribe has argued that the deal made by Santos' government will allow FARC leadership guilty of crimes like child recruitment, terrorism, and murder to largely avoid punishment. Uribe has led a "civil resistance" campaign that has launched signature drives in Colombian cities.

The opposition campaign has zeroed in on the potential for FARC leaders to avoid jail time as a talking point, with some senators saying they'll continue to fight the deal even if "Yes" wins the plebiscite. Uribe has said that Santos is "handing the country over to terrorists," and the "No" campaign has been using the slogan, "Yes to peace, but not like this."

"We cannot accept impunity for these crimes," Rodrigo Quiñónez, a retired general opposed to the deal, told The Christian Science Monitor in June. "They have to submit to Colombian law and pay for what they have done."

Uribe's critics and proponents of the peace deal have charged him with hypocrisy, as he presided over an administration that not only saw rampant human-rights abuses by the military go unpunished, but also allowed demobilization of right-wing paramilitary groups with relative impunity for the crimes they committed. (Uribe himself could face jail time for his role in fighting the FARC in the 1990s and 2000s.)

Another concession that opponents have seized on is the plan to allow former FARC members to hold seats in congress.

The details of that are yet to be decided (and rebel groups have been allowed to hold office in the past), but Santos himself has referred to it as a "toad to swallow."

The possibility that opponents could make the voting a referendum on Santos himself, or that confusion, pessimism, and ambivalence among Colombians could drive down turnout, leave open a chance that the accord could fail to be ratified.

'It’s like jumping off a cliff'

Among the public, sentiments about the deal and prospects for peace are mixed.

Santos, who wants to get a deal and plebiscite done before the end of the year, has proposed delaying the final resolution of some issues until after the voting. That, coupled with some demands made by the FARC, has cost the peace process some credibility, Szterenfeld told Business Insider.

"The subsequent timeframe for the implementation of the agreements is now more uncertain ... raising more risks for the sustainability of the peace settlement," Szterenfeld added. "The plebiscite campaign is also likely to deepen social polarisation and political divisions surrounding the process."

Some victims of the war have been vocal supporters of the deal.

"The reason for this is victims don't want what happened to them to happen to others. You wouldn't want anyone to go through what you've had to suffer," Alan Jara, who was held for more than seven years by FARC rebels and now leads the government body tasked with reparations for victims, told the Associated Press.

Others who have suffered during the conflict are not content to take the deal in question.

"But the FARC are a bunch of assassins and jail is the very least the guerrillas should get for all the suffering they have caused to so many people," said Alba Gomez, one of the roughly 7 million Colombians displaced by the fighting. "Without that, there's no peace."

Despite solid support for peace among Colombians, for some of them, imagining peace after 52 years of war is a struggle.

"It’s like jumping off a cliff," Gonzalo Sanchez, director of Colombia's National Center for Historic Memory, told The Christian Science Monitor. "Colombians have never known their country at peace so they can’t imagine it."


SEE ALSO: Colombia has finally ended a 52-year war, but the price of peace will be high »

NOW WATCH: Colombian authorities seized 3 tons of cocaine bound for the US hidden in a 'narco-submarine'
 

tanstaafl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I recently watched "Love In The Time Of Cholera" (2007) and while the movie was good I was more impressed that it had been filmed in Cartagena. I gather it was not a small movie production with purely Columbian actors, so I guess things by 2006/2007 had quieted down enough that the movie crew and actors didn't worry QUITE so much about being kidnapped and/or executed before the movie wrapped.
 

blackjeep

The end times are here.
"FARC, Colombian government announce end to decades-long conflict"

Well, NOW what are they going to do for fun?? :lol:
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Oh, it was anything BUT fun. A bunch of my friends were in 7th Special Forces Group when things were going hot and heavy and spent a lot of time down there.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I recently watched "Love In The Time Of Cholera" (2007) and while the movie was good I was more impressed that it had been filmed in Cartagena. I gather it was not a small movie production with purely Columbian actors, so I guess things by 2006/2007 had quieted down enough that the movie crew and actors didn't worry QUITE so much about being kidnapped and/or executed before the movie wrapped.

Considering the story line, it would have served FARC to have it be filmed unmolested...Now the other groups, that might have been a problem...
 
Top