FARM Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die

LightEcho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This topic is new to me. Searching the internet, I found articles dating back to 2019. It seems that this disease from nematodes is spreading across North America. In a short time, it has overtaken all of CT and probably most of New England as this tree killer could make beech trees extinct.

I have always had a fondness for beech tree. Soft bark and strong branches make them great climbing trees. In the Fall when all trees lose their leaves, beech trees hold theirs through the Winter and only drop their yellow/golden leaves when new sprouts/ buds pop them off.

As much as I could find- there is no treatment (yet) to stop this calamity. The nematodes eat the leaves from the inside moving along the trees vascular system. Maybe a chemical that the roots would soak up could stop this. My recent experience with coccidiosis and amprolium came to mind. I may test a little around a tree or two and see what happens. I checked my yard... yeup... the leaves are infected. In the video they show what this looks like.

Fair Use- discussion

Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die​

by: Ashley Baylor
Posted: Aug 9, 2023 / 06:26 PM EDT
Updated: Aug 10, 2023 / 03:23 AM EDT


Video at link:
Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die



HAMDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — Connecticut’s state parks are home to groves of beech trees. Typically, they provide a lush, shady canopy but you’ll notice a lot of branches and leaves missing from the trees at Sleeping Giant State Park in Hamden.


That’s because thousands of beech trees across Connecticut are infected with beech tree disease, endangering them all.


Arborists suggest this disease could wipe out not only every beech tree in the state, but every beech tree in the country.


“I have not seen a beech tree uninfected,” said licensed arborist Dan Poole.


This disease is caused by microscopic worms that settle into the beech leaves, and there are thousands per tree.


Poole is an arborist for K&J Tree Service, and the resident expert on beech leaf disease. He says the rapid spread of this disease has stunned both arborists and scientists.


“They first suspected that it was carried by birds landing on branches, or chipmunks, or squirrels, but now, they don’t know why or how it is spreading so rapidly,” Poole said. “There is expected to be a 100 percent mortality rate of every beech tree in Connecticut, every beech tree in the northeast and North America.”


Yes, 100% is correct – every single beech tree is Connecticut is likely infected and will succumb to the disease.


“The bigger a tree gets, the more leaves it needs. So, with no photosynthesis taking place on these leaves, the demise of this species is inevitable,” Poole said.


It’s a relatively new disease, so history won’t solve the problem.


“We can’t look back 50 years ago, ‘oh this happened, let’s do this,'” Poole said.


There is a race against time for a cure, but sadly it’s already too late.


“Something has to get sucked into the vascular system of these trees to get into the leaves,” Poole said. “The problem is, by the time scientists come up with a cure and it’s approved by the FDA, all the trees are going to be dead.”


Every beech tree is in a different state of decline, so there is a safety concern if you have any beech trees in your yard.


“These leaves are going to fall off, the tree is going to be in a state of decline, limbs are going to start falling off,” Poole said. “It’s more important to remove these trees while there is strength in the wood.”


Check your yard for beech trees – they’re easily identified by their smooth trunk. Poole suggests having them removed before any strong wind gusts cause them to fall on your property. If you have any questions, a licensed arborist can help.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Owner has commented on what he terms "Ash Decline."


Ash are among Owner's favorite trees at least in part because the wood can be burned in his stove GREEN - as in no seasoning required.

Owner tells visitors about "The King's Wood." Which is the Ash Tree.

In England's "age of regency" the land was almost totally owned by those of means. Meanwhile everyone else was reduced to a "tenant farmer" status (Kind of like what TPTB have in mind for you now.)

The tenants could farm the baron's land, and would pay the regent in part of their produce as their "rent."

However, by the time of the King's Wood, the land was largely cleared and most of the trees were gone - and wood for heating the baronial manor was in short supply - and not to be wasted on mere tenants. They could harvest wood for the baron but could keep none for themselves.

BUT - the Tenants found that they could cut and burn the Ash Tree IN THE SAME DAY - thus there were no piles of wood drying to reveal the tenant disregard of dictat.

"To Burn the Kings Wood" became the ultimate "middle finger" to the Baron.

Owner likes the connection - and doesn't like the failing of various ash trees locally of which he is fond.

Dobbin
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Oak Decline has worked across south Tx.

Watched over the last 10 years at deer camp.

Old oak bottoms are now gone. Trees that took two people to reach around.

I wish that would come up here. I hate oaks. They're dirty trees that constantly produce dead branches and drop crap all over my yard. Note that I'm not including Live Oaks in that; although we don't have them up here, they're impressive trees. I'm sad for the Ash and Beeches though. There's a beautiful, huge beech in my hometown on one of the college campuses. It's been right on the corner of a major intersection in town forever. It'll be a shame if that goes. However, on a good note, there are apparently more and more actual chestnut trees now, as arborists and horticulturalists have managed to produce a true chestnut that has been hybridized just enough to give it resistance to the chestnut blight. Maybe they'll manage to find a way to bring back the ash and beech too.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
Oak Decline has worked across south Tx.

Watched over the last 10 years at deer camp.

Old oak bottoms are now gone. Trees that took two people to reach around.
haven't heard of this. Does it affect ALL types of oak (there are many many MANY) or just one/ some?
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
I wish that would come up here. I hate oaks. They're dirty trees that constantly produce dead branches and drop crap all over my yard. Note that I'm not including Live Oaks in that; although we don't have them up here, they're impressive trees. I'm sad for the Ash and Beeches though. There's a beautiful, huge beech in my hometown on one of the college campuses. It's been right on the corner of a major intersection in town forever. It'll be a shame if that goes. However, on a good note, there are apparently more and more actual chestnut trees now, as arborists and horticulturalists have managed to produce a true chestnut that has been hybridized just enough to give it resistance to the chestnut blight. Maybe they'll manage to find a way to bring back the ash and beech too.
I had heard they were "working" on a replacement for the American Chestnut but hadn't heard they had brought a successful variety past the seedling / young growth stage. This is good news! I recently read an article about how the mountains and valleys here were once covered with Chestnut trees, and there's a "Chestnut Mountain" area north of me where my mama said there used to be entire forests of chestnuts and she / friends would go up there to gather them in the Fall for roasting (just as the Christmas song says). This would have been in the 19-teens when she was a girl.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
This topic is new to me. Searching the internet, I found articles dating back to 2019. It seems that this disease from nematodes is spreading across North America. In a short time, it has overtaken all of CT and probably most of New England as this tree killer could make beech trees extinct.

I have always had a fondness for beech tree. Soft bark and strong branches make them great climbing trees. In the Fall when all trees lose their leaves, beech trees hold theirs through the Winter and only drop their yellow/golden leaves when new sprouts/ buds pop them off.

As much as I could find- there is no treatment (yet) to stop this calamity. The nematodes eat the leaves from the inside moving along the trees vascular system. Maybe a chemical that the roots would soak up could stop this. My recent experience with coccidiosis and amprolium came to mind. I may test a little around a tree or two and see what happens. I checked my yard... yeup... the leaves are infected. In the video they show what this looks like.

Fair Use- discussion

Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die​

by: Ashley Baylor
Posted: Aug 9, 2023 / 06:26 PM EDT
Updated: Aug 10, 2023 / 03:23 AM EDT


Video at link:
Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die


HAMDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — Connecticut’s state parks are home to groves of beech trees. Typically, they provide a lush, shady canopy but you’ll notice a lot of branches and leaves missing from the trees at Sleeping Giant State Park in Hamden.


That’s because thousands of beech trees across Connecticut are infected with beech tree disease, endangering them all.


Arborists suggest this disease could wipe out not only every beech tree in the state, but every beech tree in the country.


“I have not seen a beech tree uninfected,” said licensed arborist Dan Poole.


This disease is caused by microscopic worms that settle into the beech leaves, and there are thousands per tree.


Poole is an arborist for K&J Tree Service, and the resident expert on beech leaf disease. He says the rapid spread of this disease has stunned both arborists and scientists.


“They first suspected that it was carried by birds landing on branches, or chipmunks, or squirrels, but now, they don’t know why or how it is spreading so rapidly,” Poole said. “There is expected to be a 100 percent mortality rate of every beech tree in Connecticut, every beech tree in the northeast and North America.”


Yes, 100% is correct – every single beech tree is Connecticut is likely infected and will succumb to the disease.


“The bigger a tree gets, the more leaves it needs. So, with no photosynthesis taking place on these leaves, the demise of this species is inevitable,” Poole said.


It’s a relatively new disease, so history won’t solve the problem.


“We can’t look back 50 years ago, ‘oh this happened, let’s do this,'” Poole said.


There is a race against time for a cure, but sadly it’s already too late.


“Something has to get sucked into the vascular system of these trees to get into the leaves,” Poole said. “The problem is, by the time scientists come up with a cure and it’s approved by the FDA, all the trees are going to be dead.”


Every beech tree is in a different state of decline, so there is a safety concern if you have any beech trees in your yard.


“These leaves are going to fall off, the tree is going to be in a state of decline, limbs are going to start falling off,” Poole said. “It’s more important to remove these trees while there is strength in the wood.”


Check your yard for beech trees – they’re easily identified by their smooth trunk. Poole suggests having them removed before any strong wind gusts cause them to fall on your property. If you have any questions, a licensed arborist can help.
Great. We've spent several tens of thousands to have the dead/dying ash trees around our place removed before they fell on the house. Now we have to plan on getting the beech trees taken out at some point. All we're gonna have left is pines and maples and there's a pine beetle issue in our area.
 

mecoastie

Veteran Member
I wish that would come up here. I hate oaks. They're dirty trees that constantly produce dead branches and drop crap all over my yard. Note that I'm not including Live Oaks in that; although we don't have them up here, they're impressive trees. I'm sad for the Ash and Beeches though. There's a beautiful, huge beech in my hometown on one of the college campuses. It's been right on the corner of a major intersection in town forever. It'll be a shame if that goes. However, on a good note, there are apparently more and more actual chestnut trees now, as arborists and horticulturalists have managed to produce a true chestnut that has been hybridized just enough to give it resistance to the chestnut blight. Maybe they'll manage to find a way to bring back the ash and beech too.
You don’t burn wood or cut timber do you. White and red oak are money trees. If you don’t like them in your yard have them removed.
 

TxGal

Day by day
We've got Oak Leaf Wilt down here in our part of Texas. I thought all the standing dead trees/trees dying were due to the ice storm last winter and the drought/high heat now. Apparently it's taking some trees, but the majority is due to the wilt, according to the tree folks I've spoken with. Nothing we can do about it, I believe.
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
You don’t burn wood or cut timber do you. White and red oak are money trees. If you don’t like them in your yard have them removed.

I've lived in a wood-burning home my entire life; my father literally wrote the book on it. But up here, unless you've got a proper woodlot, the tree companies won't take down trees unless you pay them. I've got about 15-20 oaks I'd love to have taken, but they want more than $1k per tree to cut.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
haven't heard of this. Does it affect ALL types of oak (there are many many MANY) or just one/ some?

It doesn't seem to affect the mottes of scrub oaks as bad.

More of the older, bigger trees.

IIRC, it can be transmitted by chainsaw contamination and through the root systems.

Tree trimming crews were dipping their saw blades in something to inhibit the spread, at one time.

There was also talk of digging a trench around uninfected trees to stop the root spread.

Dunno how they're dealing with things now.
 

Signwatcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This topic is new to me. Searching the internet, I found articles dating back to 2019. It seems that this disease from nematodes is spreading across North America. In a short time, it has overtaken all of CT and probably most of New England as this tree killer could make beech trees extinct.

I have always had a fondness for beech tree. Soft bark and strong branches make them great climbing trees. In the Fall when all trees lose their leaves, beech trees hold theirs through the Winter and only drop their yellow/golden leaves when new sprouts/ buds pop them off.

As much as I could find- there is no treatment (yet) to stop this calamity. The nematodes eat the leaves from the inside moving along the trees vascular system. Maybe a chemical that the roots would soak up could stop this. My recent experience with coccidiosis and amprolium came to mind. I may test a little around a tree or two and see what happens. I checked my yard... yeup... the leaves are infected. In the video they show what this looks like.

Fair Use- discussion

Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die​

by: Ashley Baylor
Posted: Aug 9, 2023 / 06:26 PM EDT
Updated: Aug 10, 2023 / 03:23 AM EDT


Video at link:
Expert: All beech trees in Connecticut will die


HAMDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — Connecticut’s state parks are home to groves of beech trees. Typically, they provide a lush, shady canopy but you’ll notice a lot of branches and leaves missing from the trees at Sleeping Giant State Park in Hamden.


That’s because thousands of beech trees across Connecticut are infected with beech tree disease, endangering them all.


Arborists suggest this disease could wipe out not only every beech tree in the state, but every beech tree in the country.


“I have not seen a beech tree uninfected,” said licensed arborist Dan Poole.


This disease is caused by microscopic worms that settle into the beech leaves, and there are thousands per tree.


Poole is an arborist for K&J Tree Service, and the resident expert on beech leaf disease. He says the rapid spread of this disease has stunned both arborists and scientists.


“They first suspected that it was carried by birds landing on branches, or chipmunks, or squirrels, but now, they don’t know why or how it is spreading so rapidly,” Poole said. “There is expected to be a 100 percent mortality rate of every beech tree in Connecticut, every beech tree in the northeast and North America.”


Yes, 100% is correct – every single beech tree is Connecticut is likely infected and will succumb to the disease.


“The bigger a tree gets, the more leaves it needs. So, with no photosynthesis taking place on these leaves, the demise of this species is inevitable,” Poole said.


It’s a relatively new disease, so history won’t solve the problem.


“We can’t look back 50 years ago, ‘oh this happened, let’s do this,'” Poole said.


There is a race against time for a cure, but sadly it’s already too late.


“Something has to get sucked into the vascular system of these trees to get into the leaves,” Poole said. “The problem is, by the time scientists come up with a cure and it’s approved by the FDA, all the trees are going to be dead.”


Every beech tree is in a different state of decline, so there is a safety concern if you have any beech trees in your yard.


“These leaves are going to fall off, the tree is going to be in a state of decline, limbs are going to start falling off,” Poole said. “It’s more important to remove these trees while there is strength in the wood.”


Check your yard for beech trees – they’re easily identified by their smooth trunk. Poole suggests having them removed before any strong wind gusts cause them to fall on your property. If you have any questions, a licensed arborist can help.

It's a race against time to get the FDA to approve something that will save the Beech trees, BUT they can throw a clot shot out to kill people with no real trials.

Sounds about right...
 

willowlady

Veteran Member
All this news is very, very bad news. IIRC, trees of all types produce the oxygen we breathe. I would actually surmise that deciduous trees produce more than evergreen, but that an uneducated guess.
 

Squib

Veteran Member
It's a race against time to get the FDA to approve something that will save the Beech trees, BUT they can throw a clot shot out to kill people with no real trials.

Sounds about right...

Exactly!

They should be trying to do something truly productive, find a way to save these dying tree species and not make up crap to try and better control the peons.
 

LightEcho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
All this news is very, very bad news. IIRC, trees of all types produce the oxygen we breathe. I would actually surmise that deciduous trees produce more than evergreen, but that an uneducated guess.
Yes, oxygen. And oxygen keeps us from being burned by the sun. The "science" community is either grossly ignorant or willfully stupid about many things. Remember the ozone thing? Ozone is O3 ( O-O-O) whereas oxygen is diatomic O2. Ozone is created by ultraviolet rays hitting O2 (or by electric charge like lightning bolts). You need O2 in the upper atmosphere for ozone to be in the upper atmosphere. Oxygen absorbs the UV rays.

Agencies without our permission are spraying metals like aluminum, barium, strontium and of course there are burned jet fuel fumes at high altitudes. These can all react with oxygen. But the devils will blame YOU for greenhouse gases and refrigerants (like freon) for what they are doing at 20,000 ft altitude. Oxygen is being depleted from the upper atmosphere and we will see people (and plants) getting burned by the sun "mysteriously".

I know this is a bit off topic, but these things are tied together, orchestrated by the same demonic controllers.
 

arks

Trying to keep up
Ash trees are all dead around here.
But it's that dam imported Chinese ash boring insect.
Yep, same here. Just a few weeks ago I had 6 taken down, of which 2 were very close to the house. Just finished moving the logs and branches out of the lawn this morning. Cuttin’ them up for firewood and should have 2 full cord for winter.
 

Old Gray Mare

TB Fanatic
I had heard they were "working" on a replacement for the American Chestnut but hadn't heard they had brought a successful variety past the seedling / young growth stage. This is good news! I recently read an article about how the mountains and valleys here were once covered with Chestnut trees, and there's a "Chestnut Mountain" area north of me where my mama said there used to be entire forests of chestnuts and she / friends would go up there to gather them in the Fall for roasting (just as the Christmas song says). This would have been in the 19-teens when she was a girl.
There are American Chestnut crossed with the Chinese Chestnut that are resistant to the blight. The American chestnut has been working on the problem in the wild as well. I came across them while helping to clear the Appalachian Trail years ago. The blight doesn't effect the roots and shoots will sprout up after the top of the tree had died. The sprouts have lived long enough to produce seed.

Hopefully one way or another a resistant tree will develop over time.
 

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
Our ash tree population is making a comeback after losing more to the borer. Got one about 30' tall growing right now-beautiful trees, and great firewood!
glad to hear that - I loose 5-7 huge ash trees every season. in early October there's a monster near the house that I've got to take down - easily 36-40" diameter at the base. an ancient tree and I will regret losing it. its a dangerous tree - way to complicated to take down myself and it will need a professional tree crew. its easily a 15-1700 adventure.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
glad to hear that - I loose 5-7 huge ash trees every season. in early October there's a monster near the house that I've got to take down - easily 36-40" diameter at the base. an ancient tree and I will regret losing it. its a dangerous tree - way to complicated to take down myself and it will need a professional tree crew. its easily a 15-1700 adventure.

DEWWWWWHAT?

You buyin' the beer?

We can handle that $#it.

R.01b73b0e39a6efb147f892b59a5511c6
 

Raggedyman

Res ipsa loquitur
way too close to the house and a bad leaner with the heavy side into the lean - TOWARDS the house - need a bucket truck and it will have to be pieced and roped down bit by bit. gonna be a BEECH . . .
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member

Beech Leaf Disease​

Pathogen​

The foliar nematode Litylenchus crenatae ssp. mcannii (Lcm) is responsible for beech leaf disease (Carta et al. 2020) and is believed to be non-native in North America.

History, Distribution and Hosts​

Beech leaf disease (BLD) was first discovered in 2012 from northeastern Ohio (Ewing et al. 2019). In 2019, the disease was detected in southwestern Connecticut (Marra and Lamondia 2020) and several nearby counties in New York. As of 2023, BLD has become firmly established across Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts. While the worst affected areas in Massachusetts are in Essex, Middlesex, Suffolk, Norfolk, Plymouth and Bristol counties, BLD has been reported across the state. It is expected to continue its rapid spread throughout the northeast over the next several years. This is especially concerning in areas where the northern hardwood (beech-birch-maple) forest type dominates. Many northern hardwood forests in western Massachusetts are primarily composed of American beech (Fagus grandifolia). Prior to BLD, no foliar nematode was ever known to cause a disease of woody plants that results in mortality (Carta et al. 2020). While uncertainty lingered for many years as to the cause of BLD, research has clearly linked the presence of the nematode to symptom development in natural and inoculated beech (Carta et al. 2020). American, European (F. sylvatica), Japanese (F. crenata) and Oriental beech (F. orientalis) are known hosts.

Symptoms and Life Cycle​

Symptoms of BLD appear as: (i) dark-colored, interveinal banding on the foliage; (ii) cupping, curling and distortion of the foliage; (iii) thickening of the leaves and a general "leathery" texture; (iv) premature leaf shedding; and (v) death of the buds and subsequent branch dieback resulting in death of the tree. While the interveinal banding is often dark green in color, on European beech the banding may be reddish in color. The dark, interveinal banding, cupping and distortion may be caused by toxins, pectinases, phenolics or caretonoids produced by the nematode (Cara et al. 2020). It’s hypothesized that thicker, darker leaf tissue may protect the nematode against UV light and provide a larger number of cells for feeding.

Lcm invades beech buds from mid-summer into autumn (roughly late June into October), where they feed and overwinter (Reed et al. 2020). They likely have many vectors with birds and insects providing the best means of dispersal. It is within the buds that the damage takes place. During the late autumn and winter months, Lcm populations are high within infested beech buds (Reed et al. 2020). When disease severity is minor to moderate, symptomatic leaves emerge the following spring. When disease severity is high, buds are killed outright and no new leaves and shoots are produced. Nematode eggs produced within the buds are dispersed during budbreak and leaf expansion and may scatter throughout the canopy on splashing rainwater and wind. They can survive for long periods until sufficient moisture allows for hatching. Very large populations of nematode eggs exist within the aborted buds. When infested trees flush symptomatic foliage in the spring, a second flush of leaves may also occur. This second flush of foliage is disease free, but often stunted and unevenly produced through the canopy.

Numerous studies are investigating the vectors of BLD, disease etiology and management of the nematode. Much remains to be learned about this new and destructive disease. While initial reports from the Midwest suggested that mature trees could withstand the disease for many years (Ewing et al. 2019), trees in southern New England are dying rapidly after infection. Additional stresses such as drought, winter injury, twig/branch cankering fungi (e.g. Phomopsis, Botryosphaeria and Diplodia), ambrosia beetle infestation, and other insects pests and pathogens may accelerating the decline of infested trees.

Management​

Cultural: There are no cultural practices that can limit the spread and severity of BLD. Because the primary vectors of BLD are birds and insects, management aimed at limiting disease spread is not possible. There are no quarantine zones or best management practices associated with the disposal of infested beech material. Once BLD establishes in an area, it cannot be eradicated by the removal of one infested tree. BLD can move on nursery stock, therefore any beech stock should be carefully examined prior to purchase and planting.

Phosphites: Soil applications of phosphites (mono- and di-potassium salts of Phosphorous acid) for root uptake have been shown to effectively control BLD, although results vary considerably. A notable improvement in tree vigor may take several years of regular treatments. Spring and fall applications may be required for best results. Phosphites have two modes of action: (1) through direct antifungal activity when applied in high concentrations; and (2) by stimulating the tree’s natural defense response (Thao and Yamakama 2009). The first mode of action likely has no value since BLD is caused by a nematode and not a fungus. However, the second mode of action, natural defense stimulation, may be how phosphites help to induce some level of disease resistance within infected beech. Phosphites have been used previously to control plant parasitic nematodes with mixed results.

Nematicide: Early research suggests the locally systemic nematicide fluopyram may provide some level of BLD control but uncertainty exists regarding the optimal time for application. Lcm has overlapping generations, meaning that eggs, juveniles and adults may all be present within infected buds and leaves. In addition, eggs are dispersed during budbreak and leaf expansion and may be present on twigs and branches, waiting for moisture to hatch and develop. Any time an organism has staggered development, chemical intervention must be timed correctly for maximum control. One recommendation is to make applications later in the growing season (mid-July onward). The nematodes emerge from infested foliage and migrate to the buds from roughly late June into October (Reed et al. 2020). A July application that targets the foliage could theoretically target the nematodes before they migrate to the buds.

An alternative strategy is focused on making applications earlier in the growing season (i.e. May), when the product may be better absorbed into tender foliage. However, there is still uncertainty over whether fluopyram will kill Lcm eggs. Fluopyram has efficacy against a wide array of plant parasitic nematodes, but for some, it does not kill the eggs (Schleker et al. 2022). If applications are made early in the growing season and the eggs survive, the treatment would not be fully effective. However, if the fluopyram persisted well in the treated foliage, once the juvenile nematodes hatched and migrated into the leaves, they would receive a toxic dose. There is a moderate risk of resistance development when using fluopyram. That means to avoid resistance development, fluopyram must be rotated with another nematicide. However, at present, another nematicide labeled for use on trees with potential efficacy has not be identified. Therefore, only two applications of fluopyram should be made to avoid resistance development by Lcm.

Two commercial products formulated for use on woody plants are available. The first is Broadform, a combination product composed of fluopyram + trifloxystrobin. The Broadform label covers residential and commercial landscapes and "ornamental" hosts, including all species of beech (Fagus). Additionally, the supplemental Broadform 2ee covers recommendations to manage BLD, with a rate of 8 fl. oz./100 gal and an application interval of 7 - 14 days. The 2ee recommendation for BLD covers Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. The second product is Luna Experience, another combination product (fluopyram + tebuconazole) labeled for use on woody plants (including beech). However, Luna Experience is labeled only for agriculture use and not for woody ornamentals. Currently, Connecticut has an emergency use order allowing the use of Luna Experience on beech in residential and commercial landscape settings. Massachusetts does not have this emergency use exemption. Finally, Indemnify is a single fluopyram product but is labeled for use on turf only.

References​

Carta L.K., Handoo Z.A., Li S., et al. 2020. Beech leaf disease symptoms caused by newly recognized nematode subspecies Litylenchus crenatae mccannii(Anguinata) described from Fagus grandifolia in North America. Forest Pathology, 50: e12580. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12580

Ewing C.J., Hausman C.E., Pogacnik J., Slot J., Bonello, P. 2019. Beech leaf disease: An emerging forest epidemic. Forest Pathology 49: e12488. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12488

Marra, R.E. and LaMondia, J. 2020. First report of Beech Leaf Disease, caused by the foliar nematode, Litylenchus crenatae mccannii, on American Beech (Fagus grandifolia) in Connecticut. Plant Disease, 104(9). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0442-PDN

Reed, S.E., Greifenhagen, S., Yu, Q., et al. 2020. Foliar nematode, Litylenchus crenatae ssp. mccannii, population dynamics in leaves and buds of beech leaf disease-affected trees in Canada and the US. Forest Pathology, 50: e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12599

Thao, H.T.B. and Yamakawa, T. 2009. Phosphite (phosphorous acid): Fungicide, fertilizer or bio-stimulator? Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 55(2): 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00365.x
 

Squib

Veteran Member
The way things are going we'll only have Chinese Privot, Bradford Pears, Mimosa, Paulownia and Ailanthus.

Russian olive grows really well around here…very hearty… but most people don’t like them for some reason…

The wood is pretty, they’re drought resistant, the wood burns well, and the trees are pretty when groomed…when they grow wild, the deer love to bed down in them…same with other critters.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Ash trees are all dead around here.
But it's that dam imported Chinese ash boring insect.
We were told the same thing years ago when trying to find ash for firewood delivery. DH was hoping for a little bit to mix in with the other firewood.

I think here in Indiana Ash is pretty rare now :(
 

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
These waves happen all the time. Unless they affect your own area directly, most people are unaware.

Up north here (N MN) all of our spruce trees are dead or dying - and I mean ALL of them - because of spruce budworm disease. Where you used to see miles and miles of green, now you see miles and miles of grey. Maybe fuel one hell of a fire someday because spruce make up a big portion of our native forests. But there's no good remedy, and either something else will take their place, or a resistant strain of spruce will emerge.
 

SquonkHunter

Geezer (ret.)
The way things are going we'll only have Chinese Privot, Bradford Pears, Mimosa, Paulownia and Ailanthus.
In Texas we will always have mesquite trees. Those damned things are indestructible and highly invasive. At least they make fairly decent wood for smoking meats à la Central Texas German-style BBQ. Just keep a few extra chains handy for your chainsaw. Their wood is so hard it will destroy a chain pretty fast. Myself, I prefer pecan wood when available and post oak otherwise.
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member
All this is interesting but how did BLD all the sudden come about?

No one seems to know, but according to the following article, the invasive foliar nematode (roundworm) is a subspecies of a roundworm originally described in Japan.


Beech Leaf Disease (BLD)​

Are you seeing stripes on a hike? You may have encountered beech leaf disease. Beech leaf disease, we’ll call it BLD, is a relatively new disease found to affect American Beech, European beech and Oriental beech trees (Ewing et al., 2019). The most obvious symptom is dark striping between leaf veins, but also look for chlorosis (yellowing), crinkled or thickened leaves (Carta et al., 2020). Beech leaf disease first appeared in Ohio in 2012 and has since been detected in states throughout the northeast. Scientists are still learning what causes the disease and how it impacts beech trees. Forest health impacts include twig dieback, canopy thinning, and mortality in young saplings. In some areas with several years of infection, BLD can kill mature trees (Reed et al., 2022).


data

Image courtesy of: Tom Macy, Ohio DNR
Beech leaf disease appears to be caused by a microscopic nematode (Carta et al., 2020) called Litylenchus crenatae ssp. Mccannii (LCM). This is a subspecies of the nematode Litylenchus crenatae, originally described in Japan. Nematodes, or roundworms, are tiny, unsegmented worms. The nematode damages beech leaf tissue by feeding inside leaves and buds. The nematode overwinters in the young buds and in leaves (Reed et al., 2022). Scientists are studying how LCM moves between trees. Possible modes of dispersal are still being investigated, but could included human-mediated dispersal or movement via birds or insects (Martin and Volk, 2021). Leaf-loving nematodes like LCM rely on water for movement and dispersal (Kohl, 2011).
data

Female (left) and male (right) Litylenchus crenatae ssp. Mccannii nematodes. Image courtesy of: Paulo Vieira, USDA
Litylenchus crenatae ssp. Mccannii nematodes inside beach leaf. Image courtesy of: Paulo Vieira, USDA
To date, beech leaf disease has been observed across the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern states, a total of 10 states and Ontario, Canada (University of Maryland Extension, 2023). Currently the closest location to Washington DC is located in Fairfax County, VA (July 2023).
What’s next

There are relatively few beech trees among DC’s publicly-owned trees (Urban Forestry Street Trees), less than 1% of the public tree inventory. However, of the approximately two million trees that make up the DC’s entire urban forest, beech is the most commonly occurring tree species at 18% (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2023). The majority of these beech are located on federal property owned by the National Park Service.

Five most common tree species in the District of Columbia. Data reported from the US Forest Service Urban Forest Inventory and Analysis. These data and graph were generated from My City’s Trees web app, My City's Trees Data were accessed on June 30, 2023.
Currently, there are no methods for the control or management of BLD. However, increasing awareness of this new disease can help limit its spread when the public avoids activities such as moving firewood in or out of forested areas with BLD. State and federal natural resources managers encourage the public to learn how to detect BLD and to report it to local agencies. Symptoms are most easily observed while viewing from below branches, looking up into the canopy. Symptoms, such as striping, yellowing, or thickened leaves, first appear in the lower canopy and on sapling sized trees. As the disease progresses, it moves into the upper canopy, leading to branch dieback and loss of canopy cover. If you see symptoms consistent with BLD, please follow the link below to share your findings.
 
Last edited:

tno5

Senior Member
Oak Decline has worked across south Tx.

Watched over the last 10 years at deer camp.

Old oak bottoms are now gone. Trees that took two people to reach around.
I have a huge white oak in my front yard - it is beautiful - I am terrified that it has the decline - something is wrong with it just in the past year. It would probably cost 5,000 if it gets worse to take it down. Just paid $1500 to have the Ash tree in my front yard taken down because of the borers.
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member

Glyphosate Kills Microorganisms Beneficial to Plants, Animals, and Humans​


(Beyond Pesticides, October 28, 2021) A study published in Frontiers in Environmental Science finds the popular herbicide glyphosate negatively affects microbial communities, indirectly influencing plant, animal, and human health. Exposure to sublethal concentrations of glyphosate shifts microbial community composition, destroying beneficial microorganisms while preserving pathogenic organisms.

Glyphosate is the most commonly used active ingredient worldwide, appearing in many herbicide formulas, including Bayer’s (formerly Monsanto) Roundup®. The use of this chemical has been increasing since the inception of crops genetically modified to tolerate glyphosate over two decades ago. The toxic herbicide readily contaminates the ecosystem with residues pervasive in both food and water commodities. In addition to this study, the scientific literature commonly associates glyphosate with human, biotic, and ecosystem harm, as a doubling of toxic effects on invertebrates, like pollinators, has been recorded since 2004.

The authors caution, “[O]utbreaks of several animal and plant diseases have been related to glyphosate accumulation in the environment. Long-term glyphosate effects have been underreported, and new standards will be needed for residues in plant and animal products and the environment.” With an increasing number of reports on the relationship between glyphosate and human health, including potential effects on the human gut microbiome, advocates are calling on global leaders to eliminate chemical use.

The report investigates the indirect impacts that glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) have on plant, animal, and human health. Using the scientific literature, researchers evaluate shifts in microbial community composition among different habitats. These habitats include soils for plants and the gut microbiome for animals and humans. Authors focused on three main issues: the accumulation of glyphosate in the ecosystem (including animal and plant products), the effects the chemical has on microbes in soils, animals, and humans, and whether impacts on microbes induce subsequent adverse effects on plants, animals, and humans.

The report begins with a discussion of glyphosate’s fate in soil and water. The chemical breaks down into its primary metabolite AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid) in a matter of a few days. However, clay and organic matter in soils absorb both glyphosate and its metabolite, slowing the breakdown process and making both compounds more ecologically pervasive. Soil type, environmental conditions, and previous exposure of soil microorganisms to glyphosate determine the rate at which the chemical compounds break down. Clay and organic matter in soils do not absorb all chemical constituents, as residues make their way into groundwater during heavy rainfall and contaminate surface water via runoff and erosion. North and South America have the highest concentrations of glyphosate in surface waters. However, rain, treated wastewater, drinking water, and the surrounding air contain glyphosate and AMPA residues.

The authors assess the fate of glyphosate residues on plant and animal products finding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for these products in 1974. However, the agency recently began incorporating AMPA residues in MRL evaluations for food and feed products from glyphosate biotransformation. Overall, the MRL of glyphosate and AMPA in products differs depending on product type and regulatory practices. In animal feed, MRL levels increase over time to compensate for more pervasive glyphosate use. A Danish study finds chemical concentrations in animal feed are occasionally high enough to cause malformations and infertility among swine, botulism among cows, and pathogenic bacterial disease among chickens.

Furthermore, studies find these farm animals ingesting glyphosate-contaminated fodder excrete the chemical via urine and feces, with up to 96 percent of the compound present in farm animal urine samples. Even among domestic cats and dogs, glyphosate concentrations in urine is relatively high due to high chemical levels in pet food, similar to farm animal fodder. In human urine samples, 90 percent of farmworkers, 60 to 95 percent of the general U.S. population, and 30 percent of newborns have high concentrations of glyphosate.

The report also covers the impact glyphosate has on microbes in soils, animals, and humans. Glyphosate acts on the shikimate pathway, present in plants, fungi, bacteria, archaea, and protozoa. Thus, many taxonomic groups of microorganisms are sensitive to glyphosate. There are two classes of microbial reactions to glyphosate exposure: glyphosate sensitive class I EPSPS and glyphosate-tolerant class II EPSPS. Additionally, classes III and IV include some bacterial and archaeal (single cell organisms that are not bacteria) microbes associated with glyphosate resistance. Class I and II reactions occur more frequently as intensive and chronic pesticide use renders some bacteria and fungi resistant to glyphosate.

These microbes can become resistant by decreasing cell wall permeability or altering the EPSPS enzymatic binding sites. For instance, the study finds glyphosate-resistant bacterial strains like E. coli and Pseudomonas alter gene function to enhance the outflow of glyphosate from the bacterial cell. Thus, the authors suggest this resistance mechanism encourages cross-resistance against antibiotics for pathogenic bacterial species like E. coli and Salmonella. The authors note that 50 years of extensive glyphosate use also increased human/animal pathogenic bacteria to break down the chemical compound. Bacillus species like B. cereus and B. anthracis can detoxify glyphosate, breaking down the chemical compound. However, the process can increase B. anthracis (the causative proxy of toxic anthrax) concentrations in the environment over time.

Lastly, the authors review the indirect impacts that glyphosate has on plant, animal, and human health, as these species rely on the diversity and stability of microbial communities. Microorganisms travel through the food chain, interconnecting the health of all organisms. For plants, glyphosate and AMPA indirectly impact plant health through changes in the endophytic and rhizosphere microbiome responsible for plant health and growth, reducing antimicrobial production against pathogens. Furthermore, glyphosate can negatively affect plant nutrient uptake by disrupting microbes that make plant nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc available.

Among insects, pollinators like bees can experience severe negative impacts on gut health from glyphosate exposure. The chemical can alter microbes in the gut, resulting in disease outcomes that reduce pollinator fitness. These diseases include deformed wing syndrome (DWS) and increased susceptibility to varroa mites. In humans and animals, a shift in microbial communities within the gut can result in dysbiosis, causing an imbalance between beneficial and pathogenic gut microorganisms. Dysbiosis affects the function of the gastrointestinal tract, limiting the ability to prevent disease and interact with the endocrine (hormone), immune, and nervous system.

Considering pathogenic microbes are less sensitive or insensitive to glyphosate, these disease-causing microbes can accumulate to worsen adverse health effects. Furthermore, the authors note a connection between gut health and neurological diseases as individuals exposed to glyphosate also experience a higher incidence of ADD/ADHD, autism, Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s.

Glyphosate has been the subject of extensive controversy about its safety for humans, non-human organisms, and ecosystems. Beyond Pesticides has reported on EPA’s ongoing failures to protect people and the environment from GBH compounds. Evidence includes the fact that the presence of glyphosate in human bodies has risen dramatically during the past three decades. Research out of the University of California San Diego found that, between two data collection periods (1993–1996 and 2014–2016), the percentage of people testing positive for the presence of glyphosate (or its metabolites) in their urine rose by 500 percent, and levels of the compound spiked by 1,208 percent. Furthermore, Bayer/Monsanto controls an extraordinarily high market percentage of seeds genetically engineered (GE) to tolerate glyphosate for corn, soy, and cotton. As of 2018, more than 90% of these crops in the U.S. are from GE seeds. All those seeds require the use of the GBH herbicide, Roundup. Science and environmental advocates have noted the multiple risks that glyphosate use represents, with Beyond Pesticides listing glyphosate as having endocrine, reproductive, neurotoxic, hepatic, renal, developmental, and carcinogenic effects on human health.

Gut microbiota plays a crucial role in lifelong digestion, immune, and central nervous system regulation, as wells as other bodily functions. Through the gut biome, pesticide exposure can enhance or exacerbate the adverse effects of additional environmental toxicants on the body. Since the gut microbiome shapes metabolism, it can mediate some toxic effects of environmental chemicals. However, with prolonged exposure to various environmental contaminants, critical chemical-induced changes may occur in the gut microbes, influencing adverse health outcomes.

Similar to gut microbes, soil microbiota are essential for the normal functionality of the soil ecosystem. Toxic chemicals damage the soil microbiota by decreasing and altering microbial biomass and soil microbiome composition (diversity). Pesticide use contaminates soil and results in a bacteria-dominant ecosystem as these chemicals cause “vacant ecological niches, so organisms that were rare become abundant and vice versa.” The bacteria outcompete beneficial fungi, which improves soil productivity and increases carbon sequestration capacity. The resulting soil ecosystem is unhealthy and imbalanced, with a reduction in the natural cycling of nutrients and resilience. Thus, plants grown in such conditions are more vulnerable to parasites and pathogens. The effects of climate change only exacerbate threats on soil health as studies show a link between global climate change and a high loss of microbial organisms in the soil ecosystem.

Not only do health officials warn that continuous use of glyphosate will perpetuate adverse health and environmental effects, but that use also highlights recent concerns over antibiotic resistance. Bayer/Monsanto patents glyphosate as an antibiotic since exposure hinders enzymatic pathways in many bacteria and parasites, serving as an antimicrobial. However, glyphosate kills bacterial species beneficial to humans and incorporated in probiotics yet allows harmful bacteria to persist, leading to resistance.

Similarly, glyphosate-exposed soils contain a greater abundance of genes associated with antibiotic resistance, as well as a higher number of inter-species transferable genetic material. Therefore, the use of antibiotics like glyphosate allows residues of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria on agricultural lands to move through the environment, contaminate waterways, and ultimately reach consumers in food. Antibiotic resistance can trigger longer-lasting infections, higher medical expenses, the need for more expensive or hazardous medications, and the inability to treat life-threatening illnesses. Resistance to pesticides is also growing at similar rates among GE and non-GE conventionally grown crops. This increase in resistance is evident among herbicide-tolerant GE crops, including seeds genetically engineered to be glyphosate-tolerant. Although one stated purpose of GE crops is to reduce pesticide use, an increase in resistance can result in additional pesticide use to compensate.

The report demonstrates that many studies used for regulatory agency assessments focus on glyphosate’s direct impact on ecosystem health. For instance, glyphosate directly affects the shikimate pathway in some bacteria. However, these agencies fail to consider how chemical exposure may indirectly impact plant, animal, and human health through other mechanisms. In this report, glyphosate is resistant to complete environmental degradation. Specific molecular linkages in the compound break down slowly in water, soil, and dead plant material by various microorganisms. However, with glyphosate causing a shift in microbial communities, there may be insufficient or non-beneficial microorganisms available to break down the toxic compound.

The authors recommend regulatory agencies set combined glyphosate and AMPA tolerance levels for products intended for plant, animal, and human consumption. The report concludes, “We recommend additional interdisciplinary research on the associations between low-level chronic glyphosate exposure, distortions in microbial communities at the species level, and the emergence of animal, human, and plant diseases. A potential connection between glyphosate exposure, populations of pks + bacterial species such as E. coli, and intestinal cancer development needs to be investigated. Connections between glyphosate resistance in bacteria and antibiotic resistance also deserve more attention. As suggested by us earlier, independent and trustworthy research is needed to revisit the tolerance thresholds for glyphosate residues in water, food, and animal feed, taking all possible health risks into account.”

To improve and sustain microbial communities, and thus human, animal, and environmental health, toxic pesticide use must stop. Beyond Pesticides challenges the registration of chemicals like glyphosate in court due to their impacts on soil, air, water, and our health. While legal battles press on, the agricultural system should eliminate the use of toxic synthetic herbicides to avoid the myriad of problems they cause. Instead, emphasis on converting to regenerative-organic systems and using least-toxic pest control to mitigate harmful exposure to pesticides, restore soil health, and reduce carbon emissions, should be the main focus. Public policy must advance this shift, rather than continue to allow unnecessary reliance on pesticides. Considering glyphosate levels in the human body decrease by 70% through a one-week switch to an organic diet, purchasing organic food whenever possible—which never allows glyphosate use—can help curb exposure and resulting adverse health effects.

Learn more about soil microbiota and its importance via Beyond Pesticide’s journal Pesticides and You. Additionally, learn more about the effects of pesticides on human health by visiting Beyond Pesticides’ Pesticide-Induced Diseases Database. This database supports the clear need for strategic action to shift away from pesticide dependency. Moreover, Beyond Pesticides provides tools, information, and support to take local action: check out our factsheet on glyphosate/Roundup and our report, Monsanto’s Roundup (Glyphosate) Exposed. Contact us for help with local efforts and stay informed of developments through our Daily News Blog and our journal, Pesticides and You. Additionally, check out Carey Gillam’s talk on Monsanto’s corruption on glyphosate/Roundup at Beyond Pesticides’ 36th National Pesticide Forum.

All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides.

Source: Frontiers in Environmental Science
 

poppy

Veteran Member
It is the Emerald Ash Borer killing most of the ash trees here too. We have a grove of 8 between our house and front pond and all are infected. Two lean toward the house and I will have to hire someone with a bucket truck to take them down and I can get the rest. Another big ash at the end of our driveway and a big one 200 feet behind the house dying also. Drive down any road here and look at any woodline. Dead and dying ash trees everywhere. Campgrounds will inspect all firewood and will not allow you to bring in ash. There is a treatment available to protect the trees but it costs about $100 per tree and has to be done yearly. Pretty expensive if you have a lot of ash trees and we probably have around a thousand on our 16 acres.
 
Top