ECON Despair flows as California fields go dry and unemployment rises

Martin

Deceased
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-drought6-2009jul06,0,3172131.story

From the Los Angeles Times
AGRICULTURE
Despair flows as fields go dry and unemployment rises
San Joaquin Valley farms are laying off workers and letting fields lie fallow as their water ration falls.
By Alana Semuels

July 6, 2009

Reporting from Mendota, Calif. — Water built the semi-arid San Joaquin Valley into an agricultural powerhouse. Drought and irrigation battles now threaten to turn huge swaths of it into a dust bowl.

Farmers have idled half a million acres of once-productive ground and are laying off legions of farmhands. That's sending joblessness soaring in a region already plagued by chronic poverty.

Water scarcity looms as a major challenge to California's $37-billion agricultural industry, which has long relied on imported water to bloom. The consequences of closing the spigot are already evident here in rural Fresno County, about 230 miles north of Los Angeles. Lost farm revenue will top $900 million in the San Joaquin Valley this year, said UC Davis economist Richard Howitt, who estimates that water woes will cost the recession-battered region an additional 30,000 jobs in 2009.

Standing in a parched field in 104-degree heat, valley farmer Joe Del Bosque pointed to cracked earth where tomatoes should be growing. He didn't bother this year because he can't get enough water to irrigate them. He's cultivating only about half of the cantaloupe and asparagus that he did in 2007. He has slashed his workforce, and his bills are mounting.

"We can't survive at 10% of our water," said Del Bosque, 60, a white cowboy hat, long sleeves and jeans protecting him from the blistering sun.

Desperation is rippling through agricultural communities such as Mendota, 35 miles west of Fresno, where an estimated 39% of the labor force is jobless. It's a stunning figure even for this battered community of about 10,000 people, which has long been accustomed to double-digit unemployment rates.

Sporadic food giveaways by churches and nonprofits draw hundreds of people. Enrollment in area schools has dropped by a quarter this year. Crime is up, so much, in fact, that the cash-strapped town voted in May to form its own police department rather than rely on the county sheriff.

On a recent afternoon, a dozen men in white T-shirts and jeans were leaning against a liquor store wall across from City Hall, hoping someone would hire them. Others, such as Candelario Torres, sat in the shade of Kiki's Pool Hall, playing cards and swatting flies. They, too, waited for the slim chance a farmer would employ them to weed tomato fields or pick cantaloupe.

"There's no water, so there's no work," said Torres, a 56-year-old father of three who doesn't have a car and can't go far to look for jobs. "Everyone in here is looking."

It's much the same in rural towns such as Firebaugh and Huron, whose jobless farm laborers helped pushed the Fresno County unemployment rate to 15.4% in May, above the California rate of 11.5% and up from 9.4% a year earlier.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last month asked President Obama to declare Fresno County a disaster area to boost federal aid. But that's not what the farmers say they want. At a recent town hall meeting in Fresno, while some women in the audience knitted, men in baseball caps and T-shirts shouted down officials from the Interior Department: "We don't want welfare, we want water."

But climate change is intensifying competition for this resource and may well force changes in the way the valley has been farmed for decades.

This area, once known as part of the great California desert, has always depended on water from somewhere else. In the early part of the century, homesteaders dug wells or hauled water from up north, but in 1952 they banded together to form the Westlands Water District. It later contracted to buy water from the federal government, which built a system of canals and reservoirs that captures water in the northern part of the state and sends it to farmers in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Because of its subordinate water rights, the 600,000-acre Westlands Water District is often last on the long list of groups receiving water from this federal project. In the last two years, below-average rainfall and a shrinking snowpack have made the supply even tighter than usual.

Statewide runoff -- the amount of rainfall and snow melt that ends up in rivers and streams -- was 53% of normal in 2007 and 58% of normal in 2008, said Lester Snow, director of the California Department of Water Resources. The federal government-run water supply allotted only half the water that farmers south of the delta had been expecting in 2007, and 40% in 2008.

This year has been even drier after a federal court ordered that pumps moving water through the system be turned down to protect endangered species including delta smelt, salmon and green sturgeon. The pumps can reverse the water flow and trap salmon in the river, pulverize fish or ensnare them on screens, said Maria Rea, supervisor of the Sacramento office of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Farmers in the Westlands Water District have protested at Fresno City Hall, joined a March for Water that stretched from Mendota to the San Luis Reservoir, and posted signs along Interstate 5 declaring the area a "Congress Created Dust Bowl."

"We taught the entire world how to grow crops," said Tom Stefanopoulos, owner of Stamoules Produce, bitterly. "But this is the first time we've had to compete with fish."

Stefanopoulos, who owns one of the largest farms in the Westlands district, has planted fewer seasonal row crops this year, but hasn't lost any of his precious pistachio trees. But a neighboring farm, lacking water, left its plum orchard to die. Weeds and dead branches now litter the ground next to Stamoules' field of sweet corn.

Valley farmers aren't the only ones suffering. Increasingly, when it come to water, one industry's livelihood is another's loss.

The more water that's pumped from the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta, which stretches from Yolo County near Sacramento to the lower parts of San Joaquin County, the more that wildlife from the area is harmed, said C. Mark Rockwell, California representative of the Endangered Species Coalition. There hasn't been a commercial or recreational salmon fishing season in California or in certain parts of Oregon in the last two years, he said.

Pulling water from the delta also lets more seawater in from the San Francisco Bay, sullying farms near Sacramento, said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, campaign director of advocacy group Restore the Delta.

"There really isn't enough water to go around, particularly in a drought year," Rockwell said.

Fights will probably escalate in the face of global warming, said Juliet Christian-Smith, a senior research associate at the Pacific Institute.

"We have a new climate reality, and our old structure for allocating water will not work for the future," she said. "Fish are just one sign of an ecosystem that's collapsing."

Officials have discussed a variety of long- and short-term fixes, including transferring water from other areas, installing gates to protect the smelt and increasing the statewide storage of water.

But Del Bosque and other farmers said they couldn't survive even one more year of stingy water allocation. Some are considering quitting the business. Field hands too are looking to other industries. But there aren't many options now that the region's construction boom has gone bust.

Valley farmworker Cecilia Reyes said some of her neighbors drive from Fresno County to places as far as Bakersfield, Hollister and Gilroy to look for work, returning at night to be with their families.

Reyes, a slight woman clad in a baseball cap emblazoned with the word "Angel," a handkerchief and long sleeves, said she felt lucky that she recently had found three days' work weeding tomato fields. "I hope there's more work this year," she said in Spanish. "If there's not, I don't know what I'll do."
 

TECH32

Veteran Member
This year has been even drier after a federal court ordered that pumps moving water through the system be turned down to protect endangered species including delta smelt, salmon and green sturgeon. The pumps can reverse the water flow and trap salmon in the river, pulverize fish or ensnare them on screens, said Maria Rea, supervisor of the Sacramento office of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

I wonder if the Governator has the balls to send troops in and turn the pumps back on...
 

Conrad Nimikos

Who is Henry Bowman
I remember a line from a movie. "Build it and they will come." Now let's hope that we aren't building as much they will go. As in go home. As in Mexico. And parts south of Mexico.
 

denfoote

Inactive
No Sympathy

Kalifornication brought on it's own problems.

Years of corrupt Demonrat rule have taken it's toll.
 

Y2kO

Inactive
I wonder if the Governator has the balls to send troops in and turn the pumps back on...

The Governator has a Nazi belt buckle.

http://raumfahrer.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/schwarzenegger/

Schwarzenegger loves the Nazi look of his belt buckle and how it provokes people when he dresses like a Nazi in the International media. He knew it produced a minor scandal when he wore it on the cover of Time Magazine. As if to make sure that we know that he knows that it symbolizes Nazism, he wore it again nine months later in the March 2008 issue of Esquire Magazine.

http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20070625,00.html
http://justgetthere.us/blog/archive...chwarzenegger-About-His-NAZI-Connections.html
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
A large part of the san joaquin valley was swampland back in the 1800s. My, my, how history does change to suit the times and memories fail or fade away. It wasn't a desert until we meddled with it.
 

Bullwinkle

Membership Revoked
There are going to be a lot of hungry people this fall.
I read about poor wheat production and the potato blight that drove the Irish out is on the east coast.

I hope the morally superior eco freaks are the first to starve to death.
 

Double_A

TB Fanatic
There are going to be a lot of hungry people this fall.
I read about poor wheat production and the potato blight that drove the Irish out is on the east coast.

I hope the morally superior eco freaks are the first to starve to death.

+1

I've posted here many times full stats on what farmers in the central valley grow. 43% of fresh veggies consumed in the USA are grown in this region.

I hope you'll have your gardens coming along nicely.
 

The Freeholder

Inactive
Before we settled it, much of California met the technical definition of "desert". Before it's over, it will again. Mother Nature always wins.
 
There was a very interesting book in the 1970s that detailed how important Calif. is to the rest of the USA and what it's loss might mean.
Worthwhile reading - even several decades later.

The "Last Days of the Late Great State of California"

From what I recall of the book, (& Kali politics aside) we'd better hope that we don't lose Calif. to desertification or otherwise.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Days_of_the_Late,_Great_State_of_California

http://www.amazon.com/Last-Days-Great-State-California/dp/089174021X

From the wiki article:

"...lists the things the rest of the world must do without, lacking California's contribution. He lists, for instance, the overwhelming percentage of the United States' agricultural harvest brought by California..."
 

Nuthatch

Membership Revoked
Freeholder: +1

We are simply going to have to find a place that IS NOT A DESERT to grow crops. What an idea.

It will stink, but nature does always win...ask people who live below sea level or in another kind of flood plain.
 

breezyhill

Veteran Member
all tb2k'ers on the border states of california, be sure to let us know when you see the "grapes of wrath" version of californians leaving the state and heading to points east.

bh
 

Nuthatch

Membership Revoked
It really has been an unsustainable business model.

Businesses that have to import, at great cost, one of their major inputs just will not make money for long.

Smaller, local farms may see a comeback, There was an article in USA Today today about young people wanting to become small farmers.
 

Hansa44

Justine Case
Freeholder: +1

We are simply going to have to find a place that IS NOT A DESERT to grow crops. What an idea.

It will stink, but nature does always win...ask people who live below sea level or in another kind of flood plain.


There were and probably still are, millions and millions of acres of farmland in the midwest, (which has plenty of moisture). The gov. paid these farmers NOT to grow anything on their land!

Probably to make room for the huge corporations to grow their products in the desert. CA.

Not to mention how high the prices increased.

I lived in Indiana for 35 years and knew quite a few that complained about this. Now CA wants to drain neighboring states of their water for these huge corps, and guess what? Neighboring states are saying NO!

I agree that it's time to turn the growing back to real farmers and onto land that was meant for farming!
 

FarmerJohn

Has No Life - Lives on TB
California's looming groundwater catastrophe

California is one of the only states in the United States with almost completely unregulated groundwater use. Groundwater users are, with few exceptions, not required to report how much water they pump. Further, groundwater levels are irregularly and incompletely monitored, leaving these withdrawals unmeasured and policymakers in the dark. In part, this is a legacy from the old days when groundwater and surface water were considered separate. We have known for a long time, however, that they are connected, and that the use of one affects the availability of the other. Pretending that we only need to allocate and monitor surface water use and rights, while unlimited groundwater use is permitted, is a recipe for disaster.

Some people like it this way. And these people do whatever they can to prevent any move to get the state to regulate, or even measure, groundwater use. If their groundwater use affects their neighbor's well or a nearby stream, tough luck.

This isn't sustainable. Sooner or later, bad things happen when the use of common resources, such as air or water, is left completely unmanaged. For groundwater in California, bad things are already happening.

Water Number: 60 million acre-feet. This is the amount of groundwater that a new study from the US Geological Survey estimates has been lost in California's Central Valley since 1961. Lost. Consumed and not replenished. In some places, groundwater levels have dropped 400 feet or more. The vast majority of this overpumping has been in the Tulare Basin, though the last few years of drought have led to significant increases in overdraft in the San Joaquin Basin as well.

As a result of some overpumping, land subsides and compacts. Buildings and roads subside and crack. Drainage patterns change. And ironically, the California aqueduct systems run by the State and Federal governments may be damaged, threatening the delivery of water to other urban and agricultural users.

The truth is, there is not enough surface water to satisfy Central Valley growers, and so they pump groundwater. In an average year in the Central Valley, groundwater provides nearly half of irrigation water demand. In a dry year, such as we've experienced for the past three years, some users pump even more groundwater and groundwater may provide 60% or more of irrigation demand. If this water is then replenished in wet years, groundwater use over time is sustainable - groundwater acts like any other reservoir (only without many of the adverse consequences of surface reservoirs). If not fully replenished, however, groundwater levels inevitably fall.

The primary cost of using groundwater is to drill a well or to run a pump on an existing well - the water itself is not priced. The costs for drilling and running pumps, however, are beginning to rise. Costs for drilling new wells, especially given the depths to which groundwater has fallen, can be hundreds of thousands of dollars. The cost of electricity or diesel to run groundwater pumps is rising as well. Eventually, the damage caused by subsidence, or the conflict among users sharing the same aquifers, or the cost of pumping will increase to the point where pumping must decrease or even stop.

And when that happens, our food supply may go the way of the Delta smelt and California's salmon, and we will end up with neither fish nor farms. Let's stop pretending that pumping groundwater without constraint is a reasonable use of our limited freshwater resources. In some areas of the state, local entities have formed groundwater management authorities to manage this important resource for the benefit of all users. This should be required everywhere, but especially in areas of severe overdraft. Anything less will mean growing confusion and chaos for California water and inevitably diminishing returns for California agriculture.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/gleick/detail?blogid=104&entry_id=43563#ixzz0LNDKWUTa
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
There were and probably still are, millions and millions of acres of farmland in the midwest, (which has plenty of moisture). The gov. paid these farmers NOT to grow anything on their land!

Probably to make room for the huge corporations to grow their products in the desert. CA.

Not to mention how high the prices increased.

I lived in Indiana for 35 years and knew quite a few that complained about this. Now CA wants to drain neighboring states of their water for these huge corps, and guess what? Neighboring states are saying NO!

I agree that it's time to turn the growing back to real farmers and onto land that was meant for farming!

Hansa... while I agree that California is NOT a place truly suitable for farming in many areas... and farmers and the cities are always going to be in direct opposition to each other (which means the farmers will lose, every time)

But I have to disagree that they aren't "real farmers"...and while I think other areas CAN take over SOME of their production, there is no possible way "Mid-west farmers" can grow winter salad vegetables, or the melons, almonds, etc which come from California.

Of course, most of that is essentially a 20th century construct... a false abundance which couldn't be maintained forever. And we don't NEED salads in the winter.. people got by without them for hundreds of years.

The biggest joke for me personally is them promoting California as a "great dairy state". WTF??? Dairying takes more water than any other type of farming... and that's before you get into growing the feed. It's idiotic to have dairies out there. Of course, they may well turn the mega-dairies into pure milk factories, complete with their own desalinization plants, etc. And quite honestly, I think that's the goal.

But truthfully, I don't think (even without the eminently stupid and nihilistic EPA rulings and practices) it's possible to have as many millions of people in California AND have irrigated farms. Either or... not both.

Summerthyme
 

The Freeholder

Inactive
California is one of the only states in the United States with almost completely unregulated groundwater use.

Can't speak to other states, but here in North Carolina the use of groundwater is not regulated. They've tried twice, and those of us who believe in property rights keep beating them down.

Hey, those of you in other states--is your use regulated? This sounds to me like it could turn into another "never waste a crisis" routine.
 

lectrickitty

Great Great Grandma!
Somebody is going to buying up a LOT of land for taxes. Then when they turn the water back on they will own prime farm land. Investors are probably foaming at the mouth waiting for the opportunity! :mad:
 

Hansa44

Justine Case
Hansa... while I agree that California is NOT a place truly suitable for farming in many areas... and farmers and the cities are always going to be in direct opposition to each other (which means the farmers will lose, every time)

But I have to disagree that they aren't "real farmers"...and while I think other areas CAN take over SOME of their production, there is no possible way "Mid-west farmers" can grow winter salad vegetables, or the melons, almonds, etc which come from California.

Of course, most of that is essentially a 20th century construct... a false abundance which couldn't be maintained forever. And we don't NEED salads in the winter.. people got by without them for hundreds of years.

The biggest joke for me personally is them promoting California as a "great dairy state". WTF??? Dairying takes more water than any other type of farming... and that's before you get into growing the feed. It's idiotic to have dairies out there. Of course, they may well turn the mega-dairies into pure milk factories, complete with their own desalinization plants, etc. And quite honestly, I think that's the goal.

But truthfully, I don't think (even without the eminently stupid and nihilistic EPA rulings and practices) it's possible to have as many millions of people in California AND have irrigated farms. Either or... not both.

Summerthyme


My actual point was the gov. paying farmers not to grow on their land. Many farmers have gone broke trying to keep up with the corporate farms. The costs in so many things trying to farm sent them to the cities to make a living. Now we have a severe drought in CA. And no water to grow. Oh well. These big political ideas have a way of coming back to bite them in the backside.

Now they won't be able to grow winter salad stuff, melons, almonds, etc. either. And what some parts of the country will be able to grow, most won't be able to afford it.

And water in CA will be so expensive we won't be able to afford that stuff either. :)
 

cleobc

Veteran Member
Much of the central California farming area relies on runoff, as it says in the article. The Sierra Nevada is a huge mountain range that gets dozens of feet of snow in the winter, which melts and runs off to the east and west in the spring and summer. This water is used for irrigation, instead of just letting it run to the ocean, and has been very successfully for more than a hundred years.

They have had about half the regular snowfall for the last few years. This has created a crisis, which government has handled by cutting their water down to protect fish...It is not that farming is not viable, it is that a drought is being exacerbated by government environmental policy. It is like saying the dustbowl was created by farming methods, when the region went virtually without rain for several years.

You who live in the east and midwest, try to understand. This farming model has been sustainable since the 1800s until the government starting worrying about fish that had survived thus far just fine and screwing farmers out of water they have a right to use.

As far as dairying, should milk be shipped to California from Maine? How is that sustainable? Alfalfa farmers in California often get five to six cuttings of hay, which supports dairies just fine. Much of the industry has moved out to New Mexico, Idaho and elsewhere anyway, because of urban growth, but I hate to see people hammering California agriculture that know little about it.

Here in western Nevada, we use the same snow melt/runoff from our side of the mountains to irrigate hayfields and someone is always trying to take it from the farmers, so I can relate to the farmers' plight in California.

And they are not just giant corporations! That is a myth. More than 90 percent of farms are family owned. Don't let propaganda about corporate farming turn you against California farmers you've never met.
 

mule skinner

Inactive
Grandson was here for a family reunion. He he has lived in Michiganistan and here in NW Georgia. He now lives in Irvine, Caligoofyplace. When a real summer rain came on here he stood transfixed.. He said that in the two years that he lived out there it had never rained once.
 

Nuthatch

Membership Revoked
Summerthyme: you mentioned false abundance and I believe that is a key concept.

We may not be able to eat EVERYTHING fresh year-round any more.

We may need to widen our diets to include root vegetables and those we can preserve from our local harvest for the off-months. Our tastes might have to change from fresh greens in January when temps average 25 degrees F or below.

This will be tortuous because so many of us (my hand is up here) are used to high quality items available if we have enough cash. I think there may come a time that in-season means more than trendy again.

It isn't just protecting fish--those diversion ditches and other misc. water projects out west to divert water to new development/farming/housing, etc. were moving into or already in place 100 years ago. Just can't go on forever if it never freakin' rains.

The people before you in the runoff scheme will always get first dibs.
 

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
Nuthatch, I agree, and we already live that way. We grow close to 100% of everything we eat, and the addition of a tiny greenhouse a couple years ago has allowed us to extend our "salad season" by two months on each side of our short growing season.

But we preserve our fruit by freezing or canning or drying, keep a couple bushels of fresh eating apples in the root cellar, and (our one "faraway food" indulgence) buy a bushel of oranges from the FFA for their fund raisers).

We are able to store carrots, cabbage and celery for anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, and that is our "fresh eating" during the winter.

It's oddly NOT a deprivation. NOTHING tastes so good as the first radish and spinach salad in March... except the first ripe strawberry in June! I don't envy people who buy raspberries from Chile, strawberries from California in December, etc... it's a pale imitation of fresh, and eating seasonally always gives you something to look forward to.

And you're absolutely correct that it isn't "just protecting fish". That's not helping, and it's stupid in the extreme, but the truth is, the CITIES are sucking the water up, more than any agriculture. And the suburban houses which have to have their lawns and landscaping, and pools, and wash their cars... Well, they may have to choose between food and shiny cars, very soon.

Summerthyme
 
Top