Denninger went into the info and the lot numbers and verified some of the claims that he thought the tin foil hat brigade was making. I'll just do a few snips and then give a link as it's an in-depth read.
/snip
2021-11-02 07:40 by
Karl Denninger
in
Corruption , 18829 references
Uh, That's Not A Conspiracy Theory
There is
an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number.
What originally got my attention was the
tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being
intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them -- in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes
poisoned. That was
wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What I found, however, was both interesting
and deeply disturbing.
Lots are quite large, especially when you're dealing with 200 million people and 400 million doses. Assuming the lots are not preferentially assigned to certain cohorts (e.g. one goes to all nursing homes, etc)
adverse reactions should thus be evenly distributed between lots; if they're not one of these things is almost-certainly true:
- There is a serious manufacturing quality problem or you produced something without understanding how it would work in the body and thus failed to control for something you had to in order to wind up with reproduceable results. That is, some lots are ok, others are contaminated, have too much or too little of the active ingredient in them, some produce wildly more spike-protein than others in the body when injected, etc.
OR
- Much worse, the lots are intentionally segregated to produce different results. This implies some sort of nefarious intent such as killing people on a differential basis or that the manufacturers are running unsanctioned experiments on a mass basis among the population at-large, since they know what is in each lot and intentionallyvaried the contents.
OR
- Perhaps worst of all, reports are now being intentionally suppressed, the injury and death rate hasn't changed and there are lots with one of the two above problems but it is being intentionally not reported, having been detected almost-instantly and health providers were directed to not report anything serious (e.g. death) associated with the jabs.
/snip
What the
actual **** is going on here? You're going to try to tell me that the CDC, NIH and FDA don't know about this? I can suck this data into a database, run 30 seconds of queries against it
and instantly identify a wildly-elevated death and hazard rate associated with certain lot numbers when the distribution of those associations
should be reasonably-even, or at least something close to it, across all the lots produced and used? Then I look to try to find the obvious potential "clean" explanation (the higher death rate lot could have gone into older people) and it's simply not there when one looks at all adverse event reports. I have Moderna lots with the same average age of persons who died
but ten times times the number of associated deaths.
Then I look at
reported date of death and....
its reasonably close to an even distribution. So no, it wasn't all those old people getting killed at once in the first month. So much for
that attempted explanation.
Oh if you're interested the nastiest lot was literally everywhere in terms of states reporting adverse events against it; no, they didn't concentrate them in one state or region either.
/snip
In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that
causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (
as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that
no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile
because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies
rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure.
The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus
and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely.
Something is
very wrong here folks and the people running VAERS either aren't looking on purpose, know damn well its happening and are saying nothing about it
on purpose -- never mind segregating the data in such a fashion
that casual perusal of their downloads won't find it -- or saw it immediately
and suppressed reporting on purpose.
If these firms were not
immune from civil and even
criminal prosecution as a result of what Biden and Trump did
the plaintiff's bar would have been crawling up *******s months ago.
/snip
There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number.What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lot
market-ticker.org