INTL Cracks found in nuclear reactor that could lead to the full evacuation of Edinburgh and Glasgow

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Cracks found in nuclear reactor that could lead to the full evacuation of Edinburgh and Glasgow

The Hunterston B reactors in Ayrshire are the oldest in Europe, and dangerous cracks have been found

(see link for video)
https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/new...oD5xCcKdj8yL1EYM40OhXREzdFwxVkkPQk8iv6AkZjrP4

ByHilary MitchellEditor
14:21, 8 MAR 2019
NEWS

FOOTAGE SHOWS CRACKS FOUND INSIDE NUCLEAR PLANT REACTOR

The two reactors at Hunterston B nuclear power plant near Ardrossan are 43 years old - the oldest in Europe.

They're already well beyond their operating lifetimes, which have twice been extended by EDF Energy, and they're scheduled to close down for good in 2023.


However, there's a serious safety fault in the reactors. The fault is known as keyway root-cracking: where the graphite moderator cores in the reactors develop cracks leading to instabilities that could lead to a major nuclear accident: which would lead to a large swathe of Scotland's central belt having to be evacuated.


"In the very worst case the hot graphite core could become exposed to air and ignite leading to radioactive contamination of...the metropolitan areas of Glasgow and Edinburgh."

The reactors have been closed since October 2018 as a result, but owners EDF Energy are currently making a case for turning them back on, with help from trade union GMB.

Although the probability of a meltdown is still low, the consequences could be incredibly severe. In such an event, both Glasgow and Edinburgh would need to be entirely evacuated due to radioactive contamination.

According to Dr Ian Fairlie, an independent consultant on radioactivity in the environment, and Dr David Toke, Reader in Energy Policy at the University of Aberdeen, the two reactors definitely should not be restarted. Speaking about the cracks in the barrels, they say:

"This is a serious matter because if an untoward incident were to occur – for example an earth tremor, gas excursion, steam surge, sudden outage, or sudden depressurisation, the barrels could become dislodged and/or misaligned.

"These events could in turn lead to large emissions of radioactive gases. Further, if hot spots were to occur and if nuclear fuel were to react with the graphite moderator they could lead to explosions inside the reactor core.

0__105926780_hunterston2.jpg

The reactor core is made up of 3,000 bricks; cracks run the full length of one in 10 of them
"In the very worst case the hot graphite core could become exposed to air and ignite leading to radioactive contamination of large areas of central Scotland, including the metropolitan areas of Glasgow and Edinburgh."

Station Director Colin Weir said: "Nuclear safety is our overriding priority and reactor three has been off for the year so that we can do further inspections.

"We've carried out one of our biggest ever inspection campaigns on reactor three, we've renewed our modelling, we've done experiments and tests and we've analysed all the data from this to produce our safety case that we will submit to the ONR.


"We have to demonstrate that the reactor will always shut down and that it will shut down in an extreme seismic event."

The operational limit for the latest period of operation was 350 cracks but an inspection found that allowance had been exceeded.
 

Ta-wo-di

Veteran Member
Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania was built in 1968 so it is 50 or 51 depending on when it fired up. May be different designs, but still quite old.
 

Bean Pole

Senior Member
I've always heard this statement about nuclear energy: "It's an expensive way to boil water!" That is a truism here too. I hope & pray that the right thing is done.
 

The Mountain

Here since the beginning
_______________
Yet more justification for streamlining the approvals process (mostly by restricting or preventing envirowacko lawsuits) to get new reactors and new designs online much more quickly.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I've always heard this statement about nuclear energy: "It's an expensive way to boil water!" That is a truism here too. I hope & pray that the right thing is done.

When you look at the total costs involved the same can be said for oil and coal fired plants as well.

I wonder what they're attributing the cracks to; thermal cycling, neutron bombardment, handling, manufacturing defects or some combination there of?
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
She'll be right mate, winds blowing the other way ;)


Do you still have your .govt issued KI Melodi

59d96257d0ac22b64fd73aab8fa48598.jpg

Yes, we still have them, though Shane'site says that both husband and I are too old to take them but we keep them around in case younger folks were visiting if something goes "boom."

And yeah, tonight the wind is so blowing the "other way" lol
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.nucnet.org/all-the-news...deo-footage-of-hunterston-b-1-graphite-cracks

08.03.2019_No48 / News in Brief

EDF Energy Releases Video Footage Of Hunterston B-1 Graphite Cracks

Unplanned Events & Incidents
8 Mar (NucNet): EDF Energy has released video footage of inspections that show cracks in graphite bricks in the reactor core of the Hunterston B-1 nuclear power plant in Scotland.

In a letter to local community groups EDF Energy’s acting station director for Hunterston, Roddy Angus, said the videos are representative examples of the kind of “keyway root cracking” that has been discovered during inspections.

He said the footage, from 2017, shows that the cracks are around 1mm when first observed and they are opening very slowly.

“The average crack size is currently approximately 2mm and we have demonstrated in our safety cases that cracks up to a width of 10mm on the inside of the fuel channel and 18mm on the outside of the fuel channel are acceptable.”

EDF Energy said the reactor cores of all 14 advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGRs) in the UK are made up of graphite bricks. Channels run through these bricks for nuclear fuel, and also for control rods which can stop the nuclear reaction if needed. This graphite was always expected to change over time. How it ages is one factor which will determine how long the UK’s AGRs will operate.

“Since March 2018 we have been been carrying out the most extensive graphite investigation programme ever undertaken which has told us a lot about the condition of the graphite cores in both Hunterston reactors,” EDF Energy said.

Hunterston B has two AGRs. Hunterston B-1 began commercial operation in February 1976 and Hunterston B-2 in March 1977

The graphite core of both units is made up of around 6,000 graphite bricks – 3,000 of which contain fuel channels – which are all connected. The structure is designed to contain many redundant bricks meaning a very large number of bricks would have to crack before there were any significant safety concerns.

In March 2018 Hunterston B-1 came offline to carry out routine inspections of the graphite core. The inspections confirmed the expected presence of new keyway root cracks in the core and also identified them as happening at a slightly higher rate than modelled.

In May 2018, EDF Energy decided that Hunterston B-1 would remain offline to enable the company to work with the regulator to ensure the plant’s safety.

More details: https://bit.ly/2J2Ftur

Related reports in the NucNet database (available to subscribers):
Hunterston B-1 To Remain Offline Following Discovery Of New Graphite Cracks (News in Brief No.87, 03 May 2018)

Source:
NucNet
Editor:
David Dalton
© NucNet a.s.b.l Brussels, Belgium
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Some bits of history on these "more modern" gas cooled graphite moderate reactors....HC

For links and diagrams please see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....

steveheiser
Wed, Dec 2 2009

uranium oxycarbide
fuel
prismatic
magnox
Peach Bottom
next generation nuclear plant
INL
VHTR
Idaho National Laboratory
particle
duncan williams
uranium dioxide
NGNP
dragon
helium
AGR
UCO
triso
very high temperature reactor
Advanced Gas Reactor
pebbble
DOE
UO2
reactor
Babcock & Wilcox
Under The Hood With Duncan Williams
pellet

More

Under The Hood With Duncan Williams - VHTR - Prismatic Reactors
VHTR- Prismatic Reactors
- By Duncan Williams -

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) recently announced the successful testing of a new type of a coated nuclear fuel for its Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Program. At the center of this new particle is a nuclear fuel kernel made by Babcock and Wilcox known as uranium oxycarbide (UCO) - a mix of uranium dioxide (UO2) and uranium carbide (UC) particles.

After being bombarded with neutrons for three years in an experiment known as AGR-1, approximately 19 percent of the low-enriched uranium found in the UCO fuel kernel has been utilized. Previous nuclear fuels are capable of burning only about 10 percent or less of the uranium, meaning that even more energy can be harnessed from the UCO kernel than previously thought.

The coated UCO fuel particle is necessary for the Department of Energy’s Next Generation Nuclear Plant project. The purpose of this project is to develop a nuclear reactor that can operate at extremely high temperatures.

Aside from producing electricity, the heat produced from reactors operating between 1290-1740 F can be used for other industrial processes that require extremely high heat, such as petroleum refinement, as well as the production of hydrogen, plastic, iron, ethylene, styrene and fertilizer. Most conventional reactors operate at 570 F, precluding the use of its heat for these industrial applications.

The reactor being considered for the NGNP project is known as the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR). There are currently two types of gas-cooled high temperature reactors depending on the reactor core containing the nuclear fuel. In pebble bed reactor cores, the nuclear fuel is formed into spheres and stacked on top of one another. In a prismatic block reactor core, the nuclear fuel is placed inside a fuel rod which itself is inserted into a graphite block shaped like a hexagon.
Although both types of reactor cores can use the coated nuclear fuel particle technology, the VHTR is currently slated to have a prismatic block reactor core.

Although the results of the INL tests will surely change the status quo, one of the most widely used coated nuclear fuel particles currently used in gas-cooled reactors is known as tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) particles.

As shown in the diagram, the center of the particle is typically uranium dioxide, known as the fuel kernel, and is .5 mm in diameter. The fuel kernel is coated with a layer of porous carbon which serves to capture any fission product particles emitted from the fuel kernel.

Three additional layers of carbon are then applied to each particle: an inner layer of pyrolitic carbon; a mid-layer of silicon carbide; and an outer layer of pyrolitic carbon. These layers provide the structural support necessary to endure irradiation during the fission process.

The Department of Energy quickly realized the value of the coated particles and on March 14, 1972, was issued U.S. Patent No. 3,649,452, which describes the TRISO fuel particle and its use in nuclear reactors.

The hexagonal graphite block in a prismatic core slows down the energy level of the neutrons created by the fission process so that they can be absorbed by other fuel molecules to resulting in even more fission. An example of a hexagonal graphite block is shown in U.S. Patent No. 3,985,844, issued on October 12, 1976, and assigned to Nukem GmbH, a German corporation. The hexagonal graphite core (20) contains various sized bore holes (22 & 24). Some of the bore holes (22) are filled with fuel rods containing coated nuclear fuel particles, while other holes (24) serve as cooling channels for helium gas to flow. The gas-cooled prismatic block core has a long history of research and development both in America and abroad.

Early British Prismatic Block Reactors
The Dragon Reactor Experiment in Winfrith Heath, United Kingdom, was a materials test facility that successfully operated between 1964 and 1975. During this time, the Dragon performed various experiments with coated nuclear fuel particles that were formed into prismatic blocks.

The 20MW helium-cooled test reactor contained 37 prismatic fuel elements, and operated with its core outlet temperature at 750 C (1382 F). The Dragon had six piping loops which circulated helium through the reactor core in order to transfer the heat created by fission away from the nuclear fuel. In the event of a total loss of electrical power, the helium piping rises as it leaves the reactor core causing the newly heated helium gas to be cooled in a heat exchanger. Slightly more dense after leaving the heat exchanger, the helium continues through piping traveling downward to the bottom of the reactor vessel to once again cool the prismatic core.

Another British design of gas-cooled high temperature reactor is knows as the Magnox reactors. Magnox stands for magnesium non-oxidizing, and describes the metal alloy of magnesium, aluminum, and other metals, used in this type of reactor. A layer of Magnox was placed on the outer surface of the unenriched uranium-238 and placed in a fuel rod as seen in the diagram. Carbon dioxide gas was used to cool the reactor, while graphite was used to slow down neutrons so that they can be absorbed by the fuel and cause fission. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the United Kingdom produced many of these reactors and even exported them to other countries. In fact, on February 3, 1976, U.S. Patent No. 3,936,349, was issued to the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, which describes the reactor core of the Magnox reactor.

As can be seen from the diagram from the patent, the fuel rods were designed with fins in order to promote the cooling of the nuclear fuel contained inside them. The Magnox material had a low melting point and limited the operational temperature of the reactor. The reactor also produces weapons grade plutonium as a result of the fission process, which raises proliferation concerns. For example, North Korea currently operates a small Magnox reactor it built and claims to have produced enough plutonium to build weapons. Because of these and other factors, Magnox reactors are considered to be obsolete and are no longer commercially available.


Early American Prismatic Block Reactors
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station currently operates boiling water nuclear reactors at its Conwingo Pond site in York County Pennsylvania. But from 1967 to 1974, Peach Bottom was home to a 40 MW gas-cooled prismatic block reactor that performed much of the testing and data to be used to build later designs of gas-cooled reactors.

One of the fuels tested in this reactor is known as bistructural-isotropic (BISO) particles. These fuel particles were developed before the TRISO particle, and consist of only two layers surrounding the nuclear fuel kernel: a porous carbon layer surrounded by a dense silicon carbide layer. Tests showed that the TRISO particle was superior to the BISO particle, leading scientists to choose the TRISO fuel particle for use in a much larger reactor near Platteville, Colorado.

Although today Fort Saint Vrain (FSV) near Platteville, Colorado, is a natural gas powered electric plant, a gas-cooled prismatic core reactor successfully operated here between 1979 to 1989. The reactor at FSV was 330MW and utilized the uranium-thorium fuel cycle. This means that carbides of low enriched uranium, as well as thorium, were coated in accordance to the TRISO process described earlier. Each hexagonal fuel element was 14 inches across and 31 inches high. The 330 MW reactor core was so large that 1482 hexagonal graphite fuel elements were stacked together to achieve full power.

U.S. Patent No. 3,413,196, issued on November 26, 1968, and owned the Department of Energy, describes reactor core that was used at Fort Saint Vrain. As can be see in the top-view of one of the fuel elements of the FSV reactor, the graphite hexagonal structure contains fuel chamber holes (21) as well as coolant holes (23).

As can be seen in the cross-sectional view of the graphite prismatic core, the fuel chamber holes (21) are filled with either uranium or thorium coated fuel particles (25) and is sealed at the top with closure plugs (27 & 29). Helium gas flows through the coolant holes (23), removing heat produced from the nuclear fuel (25). The operation of this nuclear reactor was largely viewed as a success, however no further designs were built in the United States after this reactor shutdown in 1989.

Japanese HTTR
Japan has begun experimenting with the prismatic block gas-cooled reactor technology. In November of 1988, a 30MW reactor known as the HTTR first came on line near Oarai-machi, Japan. As can be seen in the diagram, the coated TRISO fuel particles in the HTTR are compacted into a fuel rod.

These fuel rods are then placed alongside one another inside a hexagonal graphite block which is about 14 inches wide and 23 inches high. These assemblies can be stacked on top of one another, although room is limited since the height of the reactor core is only 10 feet high. The HTTR is capable of operating at 1740 F, which is hot enough to be applied to various industrial applications.

Next Generation Nuclear Plant
In an attempt to satisfy the needs of the NGNP project, General Atomics is currently designing a reactor with a consortium of Russian coporations to build a 290 MW prismatic reactor known as the gas turbine modular helium reactor (GT-MHR).
Helium is used to cool the reactor vessel in the diagram on the right. The heated helium exits the reactor vessel and enters the power production vessel on the left. A gas-turbine generator there utilizes the heated helium and turns it into electricity. This design reduces the complexity of external components, since most of the necessary components can be located near one another.

Areva is also designing a reactor for the NGNP project. Areva’s design currently includes a 565MW prismatic block reactor core. According to Areva’s pre-conceptual design documents, the reactor core would have 102 columns of 10 prismatic graphite blocks each.

The startup control rods contain nuclear fuel that is used to generate enough neutrons to create a sustainable fission process, and are removed once the reactor achieves criticality, the point at which enough neutrons are being produced to sustain a long-term fission process. Other control rods containing neutron absorbing material, such as boron carbide or graphite, can be inserted into the reactor in order to disrupt the fission process and shutdown the reactor. The Areva documentation also suggests that it is investigating the use of uranium oxicarbide (UCO) as the nuclear material, instead of uranium dioxide (UO2) used in other designs.
The news from INL regarding the success of the coated UCO fuel particle is the most recent development relating to gas-cooled high temperature nuclear reactors. Although there are still more tests to be performed at the INL on the coated UCO fuel particle, the VHTR will almost assuredly use this new nuclear fuel. Although the nuclear technology was developed decades ago, material science is slowly catching up to this technology allowing gas-cooled high temperature reactors to reach their full potential.

Last Week's Column:
Under The Hood With Duncan Williams - The Evolution of the Pebble Bed Reactor
The Evolution of the Pebble Bed Reactor - By Duncan Williams - One of the more promising nuclear reactor technologies known today is the pebble bed nuclear reactor. Offering many advantages over conventional reactors, the pebble bed reactor gets its name from the type of the nuclear fuel it consumes. Just like conventional ...


About Duncan Williams
Duncan Williams graduated from the University of Florida in 1994 with a B.S. in Physics, and a minor in mathematics. Upon graduation, he was commissioned in the U.S. Navy where he completed training in the Navy’s Nuclear Propulsion program. He then served onboard an aircraft carrier, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, as a reactor control division officer. Onboard, he was responsible for the operation and maintenance of the electrical and mechanical components that make up the reactor control systems. This includes the control rod drive mechanisms, the reactor safety and emergency systems, the reactor coolant pump systems, and the ion exchangers. He also developed and implemented ship-wide reactor safety drills in order to educate sailors in reactor safety.
Duncan then transferred to the U.S. Naval Academy, where he served as a senior instructor teaching Thermodynamics to senior cadets. While serving as an instructor at the Naval Academy, Duncan attended night law school at the George Washington University Law School. After receiving his J.D. in 2004, he resigned his commission and began working as an intellectual property associate with Kenyon & Kenyon LLP. While at Kenyon & Kenyon, he drafted numerous patents relating to medical devices, electronic devices, telecommunications, as well as other technologies. He also has experience in all stages of patent litigation, and has represented numerous Fortune 500 companies in protecting their intellectual property rights. Duncan is currently an intellectual property associate at Blank Rome LLP.
If you have questions, comments, or know of a patent that you think Duncan should review E-mail Duncan Williams>> duncan@nuclearstreet.com
 

SSTemplar

Veteran Member
Sorry for you. I have worked in PWRs and BWRs here in the states.I always felt safest in a PWR. PWRs are less contaminated.Now if we could find a use for the spent fuel all would be peachy.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Sorry for you. I have worked in PWRs and BWRs here in the states.I always felt safest in a PWR. PWRs are less contaminated.Now if we could find a use for the spent fuel all would be peachy.

There's a use, "they" just have to rescind the NPT inspired domestic effective ban on reprocessing the spent fuel (never mind counteract decades of propaganda).
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
Good pics Housecarl. I have experience working with pressurized water reactors in the Navy as a radiation worker doing testing on control rod drive mechanisms.

Seems these particular gas cooled reactors have a history of issues and problems and perhaps unwarranted extension of the rules. 1977, 1997, 1998, 2006, 2007,2012, 2014, 2016, 2018,

Pay particular attention to the problem they had with contaminated CO2 gas being sent away on trucks and then an issue arose where it was thought to have been distributed commercially and might even have been used in soft drink carbonation. :shk:

The chances of a complete catastrophe are very very small, but not non existent.




From Wiki
The construction of Hunterston B was undertaken by a consortium known as The Nuclear Power Group (TNPG).[2] The two advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGR) were supplied by TNPG and the turbines by C. A. Parsons & Co.[3] Hunterston B started generating electricity on 6 February 1976.

On 3 December 1977 The Times reported[4] that seawater had entered the reactor through a modification of the secondary cooling system. The secondary cooling system uses fresh water to cool various items including the bearings of the gas circulators, which circulate the carbon dioxide (CO2) coolant through the reactor to the boilers. A small leak of CO2 through a seal had developed, and a bypass pipe was installed to remove the water contaminated with CO2 to the seawater cooling ponds. When maintenance work was carried out on the reactor and the pressure in the gas cooling system was reduced, sea water was able to flow back up this bypass pipe and into the reactor. The residual heat of the reactor was such that the seawater evaporated rapidly, leaving deposits of salt in the reactor around the gas circuit. It was estimated at the time that the reactor could be out of operation for a year, that the repairs could cost £14 million, and that electricity tariffs would have to rise by between 1 and 2 per cent. Extensive modelling work was performed in the Nuclear Power Company's (NPC) Whetstone, Leicestershire, fluid flow laboratories to determine where the salt would have been deposited, and the salt was successfully removed by technicians using vacuum cleaners and the plant returned to operation.

In February 1997 there was concern that contaminated carbon dioxide gas from the plant had got into three road tankers and then entered the food chain via soft drinks and beers.[5][6] Carlsberg-Tetley withdrew all its gas cylinders in Scotland as a result of finding contamination in one.[7]

In December 1998 an INES 2 incident occurred after severe winds and sea spray disabled all four power lines to the site during the Boxing Day Storm of 1998. After multiple grid failures in a short period of time, emergency diesel generators failed to start. Normally, in the absence of power for the reactor cooling pumps, the reactor would be passively cooled. However, the emergency control system which would have initiated passive cooling failed to act, as it had not been reset. Reactor cooling was reinstated after 4 hours. There was considerable confusion and delay in restoring power as plant schematics and security systems were computerised but were rendered inoperable due to lack of electrical power. Due to the inherent safety margins of the AGR reactor design, there was no reactor damage, and the plant would have tolerated loss of cooling for 20 hours. The subsequent investigation made several recommendations: redesign of the insulators on the 400 kV power lines, installation of an additional 132 kV power line for emergency power, a second diesel generator building remote from the first, installation of an uninterruptible power supply for the reactor safety systems and for essential computer equipment, provision of hard copy plant schematics and emergency protocols, and revised staff training procedures including simulation of multiple simultaneous system failures.[8]

In 2006 there was concern that the graphite moderator core in each of the twin AGRs at Hunterston B might have developed structural problems in the form of cracking of the bricks (as at similar AGRs)[9] but this has not been confirmed.

Its net electrical output was 1,215 MW. In 2007 the reactors were restricted to operating at a reduced level of around 70% of full output (around 850 MWe net). Subsequent work during maintenance shutdowns have resulted in Reactor 3 operating at around 82% (540Mwe net) in early 2011, and Reactor 4 at around 73% (480 MWe net). In total this equates to around 1020MWe gross output from the generators. Internal load of 90MWe brings net output to approximately 930MWe. Hunterston B is capable of supplying the electricity needs of over 1 million homes.[10]

Hunterston B was originally planned to operate until 2011. In 2007 planned operation was extended by 5 years to 2016.[11] In December 2012 EDF said it could (technically and economically) operate until 2023.[12]
Graphite core keyway root cracks
Hunterston B in 2018

In October 2014 it was reported that cracks had been found in one of the reactors at the plant following routine inspections which began in August 2014. Two of about 3,000 graphite bricks in the core of reactor four at Hunterston were affected. The plant's operator, EDF Energy, said the cracking was predicted to occur as the station ages and said that the issue would not affect the safe operation of the reactor.[13]

In October 2016 it was announced that super-articulated control rods would be installed in the reactor because of concerns about the stability of the reactors' graphite cores. The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) had raised concerns over the number of fractures in keyways that lock together the graphite bricks in the core. An unusual event, such as an earthquake, might destabilise the graphite so that ordinary control rods that shut the reactor down could not be inserted. Super-articulated control rods should be insertable even into a destabilised core.[14]

In early 2018 a higher rate of new keyway root cracks than modelled was observed in Reactor 3 during a scheduled outage, and EDF announced in May 2018 "While Hunterston B Reactor 3 could return to operation from the current outage, it will remain offline while the company works with the regulator to ensure that the longer term safety case reflects the findings of the recent inspections and includes the results obtained from other analysis and modelling."[15][16]

In December 2018 EDF pushed back their estimated return to service date to March 2019 for Reactor 4 and April 2019 for Reactor 3, to allow for further modelling work and a new seismic analysis.[17] In March 2019 pictures of the cracking were released with EDF stating that it intended to seek permission from the ONR to restart reactor 3 by raising the operational limit for the number of cracks. About 370 fractures have been discovered, on average 2mm wide, in about 10% of the graphite bricks in the reactor core. This was above the operational limit of 350 fractures, and EDF intends to present a new safety case for an operational limit of 700 cracks.[18][19]
 
Last edited:
Top