LEGAL Convenience store chain with hundreds of outlets in 6 states hit with discrimination lawsuit (Sheetz)

jward

passin' thru

Convenience store chain with hundreds of outlets in 6 states hit with discrimination lawsuit​


By MICHAEL RUBINKAM​


Updated 4:19 PM CDT, April 18, 2024

The Sheetz convenience store chain has been hit with a lawsuit by federal officials who allege the company discriminated against minority job applicants.

Sheetz Inc., which operates more than 700 stores in six states, discriminated against Black, Native American and multiracial job seekers by automatically weeding out applicants whom the company deemed to have failed a criminal background check, according to U.S. officials.

President Joe Biden stopped by a Sheetz for snacks this week while campaigning in Pennsylvania.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit in Baltimore against Altoona, Pennsylvania-based Sheetz and two subsidary companies, alleging the chain’s longstanding hiring practices have a disproportionate impact on minority applicants and thus run afoul of federal civil rights law.
Sheetz said Thursday that it “does not tolerate discrimination of any kind.”

“Diversity and inclusion are essential parts of who we are. We take these allegations seriously. We have attempted to work with the EEOC for nearly eight years to find common ground and resolve this dispute,” company spokesperson Nick Ruffner said in a statement.

The privately held, family-run company has more than 23,000 employees and operates convenience stores and gas stations in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Ohio and North Carolina.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court on Wednesday, the day Biden stopped at a Sheetz market on a western Pennsylvania campaign swing, buying snacks, posing for photos and chatting up patrons and employees.

Federal officials said they do not allege Sheetz was motivated by racial animus, but take issue with the way the chain uses criminal background checks to screen job seekers. The company was sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion and national origin.

“Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,” EEOC attorney Debra M. Lawrence said in a statement.
“Even when such necessity is proven, the practice remains unlawful if there is an alternative practice available that is comparably effective in achieving the employer’s goals but causes less discriminatory effect,” Lawrence said.
It wasn’t immediately clear how many job applicants have been affected, but the agency said Sheetz’s unlawful hiring practices date to at least 2015.

The EEOC, an independent agency that enforces federal laws against workplace discrimination, is seeking to force Sheetz to offer jobs to applicants who were unlawfully denied employment and to provide back pay, retroactive seniority and other benefits.
The EEOC began its probe of the convenience store chain after two job applicants filed complaints alleging employment discrimination.
The agency found that Black job applicants were deemed to have failed the company’s criminal history screening and were denied employment at a rate of 14.5%, while multiracial job seekers were turned away 13.5% of the time and Native Americans were denied at a rate of 13%.

By contrast, fewer than 8% of white applicants were refused employment because of a failed criminal background check, the EEOC’s lawsuit said.
The EEOC notified Sheetz in 2022 that it was likely violating civil rights law, but the agency said its efforts to mediate a settlement failed, prompting this week’s lawsuit.
 

jward

passin' thru

night driver

ESFP adrift in INTJ sea
I have been a customer for 5-6 years here in and around CLE. They have been well and truly active with DEI hiring, EXCEPT, all of them DEI hires we have in about the 5 locations I frequent are GOOD at their jobs.

Which might be a problem for the slugs n dindus.
 

jward

passin' thru
My wife raised her kids on an Indian reservation. She has to undergo criminal background checks for her school positions. The State of Iowa will not allow her to Sub full-time because her degree isn't in education (but one major and 2 minors doesn't matter). Any chance we can sue Iowa for discrimination?

RR
Maybe.

As desperate as the system is for anyone to teach, this makes even less sense than most of their policies.
-but that may be the first criteria for everything they do, eh? : (
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
My wife raised her kids on an Indian reservation. She has to undergo criminal background checks for her school positions. The State of Iowa will not allow her to Sub full-time because her degree isn't in education (but one major and 2 minors doesn't matter). Any chance we can sue Iowa for discrimination?

RR

I don't think that she can sub full-time, anyway. I think subs are limited to ten days per month. There's a whole bunch of new rules. She might want to contact a local school principal to discuss that. The principals have ways around some of the rules, or so I'm told. If she can teach math or chemistry, they will likely bend a lot of rules for her.

No, don't bother trying to sue, yet. Things are changing quickly. Even I've been asked to sub at the high school. They are working on dropping a lot of the educational degree requirements. It's a matter of time . . .
 

AlfaMan

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Convenience store chain with hundreds of outlets in 6 states hit with discrimination lawsuit​


By MICHAEL RUBINKAM​


Updated 4:19 PM CDT, April 18, 2024

The Sheetz convenience store chain has been hit with a lawsuit by federal officials who allege the company discriminated against minority job applicants.

Sheetz Inc., which operates more than 700 stores in six states, discriminated against Black, Native American and multiracial job seekers by automatically weeding out applicants whom the company deemed to have failed a criminal background check, according to U.S. officials.

President Joe Biden stopped by a Sheetz for snacks this week while campaigning in Pennsylvania.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit in Baltimore against Altoona, Pennsylvania-based Sheetz and two subsidary companies, alleging the chain’s longstanding hiring practices have a disproportionate impact on minority applicants and thus run afoul of federal civil rights law.
Sheetz said Thursday that it “does not tolerate discrimination of any kind.”

“Diversity and inclusion are essential parts of who we are. We take these allegations seriously. We have attempted to work with the EEOC for nearly eight years to find common ground and resolve this dispute,” company spokesperson Nick Ruffner said in a statement.

The privately held, family-run company has more than 23,000 employees and operates convenience stores and gas stations in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, Ohio and North Carolina.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court on Wednesday, the day Biden stopped at a Sheetz market on a western Pennsylvania campaign swing, buying snacks, posing for photos and chatting up patrons and employees.

Federal officials said they do not allege Sheetz was motivated by racial animus, but take issue with the way the chain uses criminal background checks to screen job seekers. The company was sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion and national origin.

“Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,” EEOC attorney Debra M. Lawrence said in a statement.
“Even when such necessity is proven, the practice remains unlawful if there is an alternative practice available that is comparably effective in achieving the employer’s goals but causes less discriminatory effect,” Lawrence said.
It wasn’t immediately clear how many job applicants have been affected, but the agency said Sheetz’s unlawful hiring practices date to at least 2015.

The EEOC, an independent agency that enforces federal laws against workplace discrimination, is seeking to force Sheetz to offer jobs to applicants who were unlawfully denied employment and to provide back pay, retroactive seniority and other benefits.
The EEOC began its probe of the convenience store chain after two job applicants filed complaints alleging employment discrimination.
The agency found that Black job applicants were deemed to have failed the company’s criminal history screening and were denied employment at a rate of 14.5%, while multiracial job seekers were turned away 13.5% of the time and Native Americans were denied at a rate of 13%.

By contrast, fewer than 8% of white applicants were refused employment because of a failed criminal background check, the EEOC’s lawsuit said.
The EEOC notified Sheetz in 2022 that it was likely violating civil rights law, but the agency said its efforts to mediate a settlement failed, prompting this week’s lawsuit.
So let me get this right.

A convenience store chain, which requires employees to handle cash money liquor and gasoline sales is REQUIRED to hire people with criminal backgrounds?

And not hiring people with records is considered discriminatory?

Sheetz is protecting their assets and customers; NOT violating civil rights laws.
 

Reasonable Rascal

Veteran Member
Meemur, she works FT now. They use her as a Para in the Spec Ed room but pay her Sub wages because she is a licensed Sub and they don't want her going elsewhere. Not to mention they can't hire enough Paras. They can and do pull her to Sub whenever and wherever they need her, including PE and Science as well as others, and sometimes for several days running. But not having a degree in education means she was limited to 4 consecutive days in the same classroom, though they have now increased that to 10 days. State of Iowa rules, not the school.

2 years ago the Principal offered to let her have the Spec Ed room as the teacher, in spite of the State rules, because they couldn't find anyone else. She demurred and they eventually found someone to take it for the year. While in AZ she taught 7th/8th social studies as the FT teacher for 7 months. No issues with that, and she was probably the most qualified instructor they had ever had simply because she knew first-hand some of the events studied (as she was fond of saying she lived during those times), had visited the sites being mentioned as part of the curricula like Manzanar Internment Camp, Gettysburg and Little Big Horn National Battlefields, and the Alamo.

Iowa's requirement for a teaching license border on the insane considering that their First In Education program was a miserable failure. But educators - at least in this state - have the strongest job security rules in places you have ever seen. I saw it in EMS where the instructors essentially took over the provider association (and stacked the IEMSA board like the Dems want to do the SC). The Iowa Dept. of Education guards access to teaching positions in public and private schools alike like pit bulls, and they are incrementing woke theory as much as they can get away with.

RR
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
We have a number of the Sheets stores in the tristate area from what I see they will hire all races, but locally blacks are known to steal from the work place and with a store like sheets they will try to give away piles of free food to their family and friends.
There was a KFC in town the franchise owner closed it down, tore down the building and opened up a Arby's in it place and up to now not one black has tried to apply for work there.
 

Reasonable Rascal

Veteran Member
We have a number of the Sheets stores in the tristate area from what I see they will hire all races, but locally blacks are known to steal from the work place and with a store like sheets they will try to give away piles of free food to their family and friends.
There was a KFC in town the franchise owner closed it down, tore down the building and opened up a Arby's in it place and up to now not one black has tried to apply for work there.

Pretty sure there is a joke in there somewhere. But plenty of Blacks at the Arby's we patronize in Des Moines. Actually a mixed crew depending on the day.

RR
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Maybe.

As desperate as the system is for anyone to teach, this makes even less sense than most of their policies.
-but that may be the first criteria for everything they do, eh? : (
ANYONE seeking a position dealing with kids in a school setting is required by law to pass a federal background check. School personnel, daycare personnel, kids Sunday school personnel... You name it, they need a check.

Our church had to pare down the list of volunteers to help in kids programs because the checks were getting too expensive for the large number of people wanting to help. PA nails for the cost of the checks and our church paid the costs to try an encourage volunteers.
 

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB

Biden Regime Sues Sheetz Convenience Stores for Discrimination ONE DAY After Old Joe's Embarrassing Botched Photo Op at a Sheetz Gas Station​

President Trump is swarmed by supporters at fast food restaurants and bodegas where he spends a long time talking to them and reporters, as happened last Tuesday evening in Harlem.

In contrast, 81 million vote getter Joe Biden stopped by a Sheetz gas station in Pittsburgh Wednesday afternoon and was greeted by total silence, save for one supporter who met him at the door with a hug. Video of Biden’s entrance shows two children and their mother seated, silently watching Biden, with the sound of the in-store music heard quite clearly over the small talk by Biden and the supporter.

There were no cheers, no chants of “Four more years!” Just muzak.
With few supporters to talk to, Biden was in and out in just two minutes according to the pool report.

Joe Biden walks into a Sheetz gas station in Pennsylvania and nobody cares.
The very next day the Biden regime sued Sheetz, Inc. for racial discrimination because the company WON’T HIRE FELONS!
That sounds racist?
Local WTAJ in Pittsburgh reported the news.

The Biden administration used the chain for a photo op fail on April 17th – Then sued the company on April 18th.
The EEOC released this statement on Thursday April 18, 2024.
Press Release
04-18-2024
EEOC Sues Sheetz, Inc. For Racially Discriminatory Hiring Practice
Federal Agency Charges That Employer’s Criminal History Screening Causes Discriminatory Impact Against Black, Native American and Other Workers
BALTIMORE – Sheetz, a large convenience store chain, violated federal law by denying employment to a class of job applicants because of their race, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.
The EEOC filed suit against Sheetz, Inc.; Sheetz Distribution Services, LLC; and CLI Transport, LP (collectively, Sheetz), which together operate a chain of convenience stores with over 600 locations in six states. According to the lawsuit, Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records.

The EEOC charges that Sheetz’s hiring practices disproportionately screened out Black, Native American/Alaska Native and multiracial applicants. Sheetz’s companywide hiring practices violated provisions of Title VII that prohibit disparate impact discrimination, the EEOC says. The lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz was motivated by race when making hiring decisions.
Such alleged conduct violates Title VII, which prohibits facially neutral employment practices that cause a discriminatory impact because of race when those practices are not job-related and consistent with business necessity or where alternative practices with less discriminatory impact are available. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division (U.S. EEOC v. Sheetz, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-01123-JKB, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.
“Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence. “Even when such necessity is proven, the practice remains unlawful if there is an alternative practice available that is comparably effective in achieving the employer’s goals but causes less discriminatory effect.”
EEOC Philadelphia District Office Director Jamie R. Williamson said, “This highlights the significance of the observance of April as Second Chance Month, underscoring our nation’s commitment to reintegrating individuals with criminal records into society by ensuring they have fair access to employment and other essential services. To that end, the EEOC is dedicated to making sure that individuals with criminal records are not unlawfully excluded from employment opportunities because of race.”
 

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This may be a test case. Many employers will absolutely not hire you if you have a felony on your record.

As stated if this goes to the supremes it could end up being a case where the feds are told to go pound sand as it is an employers right to discriminate based upon history if the business model requires trust and that trust is breached with a felony.

The feds would be better off spending time figuring out a way to process a way to expunge felonies immediately after conviction side stepping the issue entirely...
 

Plain Jane

Just Plain Jane

How You Know The Joker Is Running Things...​


BY TYLER DURDEN
MONDAY, APR 22, 2024 - 08:25 AM
Via The Publica Team,

Sheetz Convenience Stores Accused Of Discriminating Against Minority Job Seekers By Refusing To Consider Applicants With Criminal Record​

A popular US convenience store chain has been hit with a civil rights lawsuit accusing it of discriminating against minority job seekers because it requires applicants to have no criminal record.

On April 18, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it had filed a lawsuit against Sheetz Inc., accusing the 24/7 convenience store chain of having discriminatory hiring practices that targeted minority applicants.

According to the lawsuit, Sheetz has maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for records of criminal conviction and then denying them employment based on those records.



As a result, the EEOC is accusing Sheetz of “disproportionately screening out Black, Native American/Alaska Native and multiracial applicants.”

This is despite the fact that the lawsuit does not allege that Sheetz’s hiring practices were motivated by race.

According to the EEOC press release, Sheetz’s hiring practices violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion and national origin. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Northern Division, after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

“Federal law mandates that employment practices causing a disparate impact because of race or other protected classifications must be shown by the employer to be necessary to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the particular jobs at issue,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence.
“Even when such necessity is proven, the practice remains unlawful if there is an alternative practice available that is comparably effective in achieving the employer’s goals but causes less discriminatory effect.”

The EEOC began its probe into Sheetz after two job applicants filed civil rights complaints alleging employment discrimination.

The agency then found that Black job applicants were deemed to have failed the company’s criminal history screening and were denied employment at a rate of 14.5%, while multiracial job seekers were turned away 13.5% of the time and Native Americans were denied at a rate of 13%.

By contrast, fewer than 8% of white applicants were refused employment because of a failed criminal background check, the EEOC’s lawsuit states.

Sheetz is a chain of gas stations and convenience stores primarily located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, particularly in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina.

The franchise is most well-known for its customizable food options similar to WaWa, with a number of made-to-order dishes, frozen desserts, and milkshakes available.

We give Elon Musk the last word...

(Tweet appears above)
 

FNFAL1958

Senior Member
We have a couple Sheetz stores in my area I normally don't shop at either, because they're so busy, but I think I will now just because of the poopstain actions in the white house. More profits for Sheetz to fight the machine. But you know criminals like the poopstain, like to look out for their brethren criminals any way they can.
 

Calhounshd

Veteran Member
If Sheetz maintains a paper trail of their hires and no-hires, and I'm reasonably sure they do, this looks like a slam dunk win for the company. This may be setting the stage for requiring companies to hire pedophiles in daycare centers. And that would set the stage for Joe to find work after he is thrown out of this job.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Biden Regime Sues Sheetz Convenience Stores for Discrimination ONE DAY After Old Joe's Embarrassing Botched Photo Op at a Sheetz Gas Station
Sheetz should have hired "temporary stand-ins" to make the President's appearance "more successful."

Yunno - "Character actors."

BLM can do it - why not a corporate entity?

Maybe put piles of bricks - which if go untouched PROVE the president's popularity?

Just thinking out loud here.

Dobbin
 

meezy

I think I can...
A Sheetz just opened a few minutes' drive from my house, and now I'm even more excited to shop there. Used to stop in when my daughter went to college in NW Ohio -- the food isn't bad at all and I remember they had a whole bank of slushy machines (I love me some slushies, LOL) Haven't been yet because I figured it'd be real busy for the few first days.
 

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
I don't think that she can sub full-time, anyway. I think subs are limited to ten days per month.

That must be something from that state. Each state is different on their education teaching requirements. I subbed well over 10 days a month in California. Sometimes for weeks or months on long term subs.
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie / FJB!
Meemur, she works FT now. They use her as a Para in the Spec Ed room but pay her Sub wages because she is a licensed Sub and they don't want her going elsewhere.

That's . . . interesting. I'm not sure how much longer they will be able to get away with that.
They are, at least, increasing Para pay, a tiny bit.
I dunno. I think Iowa could benefit from some major housecleaning, starting with many of the administrators.
 
Top