CORP/BIZ BOOM! - Bud Light Plummets To 14th Place Among Beers As Anheuser-Busch CEO Pleads For Consumers To Think Of The 65,000 Employees Impacted By Boycotts

Red Baron

Paleo-Conservative
_______________
I never knew that an airplane flying straight down could pick up so much speed?

Fair Use Cited
-----------------
Bud Light Plummets To 14th Place Among Beers As Anheuser-Busch CEO Pleads For Consumers To Think Of The 65,000 Employees Impacted By Boycotts

Jeannine Mancini
Mon, July 10, 2023 at 5:01 PM EDT

As Bud Light, once a beloved contender among the country's favorite beers, spirals down to the 14th spot, the repercussions resonate far beyond the brand itself.

A recent YouGov survey reveals the decline in Bud Light's ranking, casting it below competitors like Pabst Bue Ribbon, Miller Genuine Draft and Miller Lite. This seismic shift in popularity jeopardizes the livelihoods of the 65,000 people whose economic well-being is intricately tied to Anheuser-Busch InBev's success.

Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth has taken full responsibility for the controversial promotion involving transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney that caused sales to plummet. In an interview with CBS, Whitworth emphasized that he is ultimately accountable for the actions of the company, expressing concern for the people whose livelihoods depend on Anheuser-Busch.

"It's the impact honestly on the employees that weighs the most on me," he said.

Whitworth called on people not to punish the workforce but rather to attribute blame to him. He made it clear that he acknowledges the repercussions of the promotion and urged consumers to continue supporting Bud Light.

While Anheuser-Busch has attempted to downplay Mulvaney's role in its overall strategy, Whitworth confirmed that the company will maintain its partnerships without making any changes. He did not explicitly apologize for the collaboration with Mulvaney, despite some consumers demanding an official acknowledgment of the mistake as a prerequisite for restoring their patronage.

The company's actions have been perceived as a breach of the unspoken "bar rules" that strictly discourage discussions of politics or religion. As long as the company fails to acknowledge or address the concerns, it is anticipated that the boycotts will persist.

In an effort to revive sales and regain consumer trust, Whitworth and Bud Light's brand head Todd Allen launched a new summer campaign. The company plans to triple its investments this year, including increased spending on sports, primetime and cable television advertisements. It remains uncertain whether these efforts will be sufficient to rectify the situation and rebuild the brand's reputation.

While Whitworth admits that dealing with the boycott has caused him stress, he remains devoted to Anheuser-Busch, describing it as an "institution" closely tied to the American flag. Despite the pressure to address the escalating situation, Whitworth is not the sole person facing criticism.

Alissa Heinerscheid, the first woman to lead Bud Light in the brand's 40-year history, faced significant backlash from consumers following her collaboration with Mulvaney to expand the brand's reach. Her comments about the brand being "out of touch" and in need of a makeover further fueled the controversy. As a result, Heinerscheid, along with Anheuser-Busch's global Vice President of Marketing Daniel Blake, was placed on administrative leave.

As one of the largest alcohol brands in the world for decades, the fall from grace is opening an unprecedented opportunity for investors in the alcohol space. For example, Molson Coors Beverage Co. is up 32% year-to-date as it continues to take market share from the struggling beer brand.

Another play is investing in burgeoning alcohol brands on platforms like StartEngine, which allows anyone to invest in startups including investing in StartEngine itself. Currently, the platform boasts over 13 alcohol brands, including some of the fastest-growing private alcohol brands in the country.

This article Bud Light Plummets To 14th Place Among Beers As Anheuser-Busch CEO Pleads For Consumers To Think Of The 65,000 Employees Impacted By Boycotts originally appeared on Benzinga.com.

 

Jeff B.

Don’t let the Piss Ants get you down…
It’s like the Organic Grocery Chain around here that put up 30.06 & 30.07 signs (no carry, concealed or open) and then said I should consider the employees when I told them I was no longer a customer.

That’s not my problem. It’s yours. You made a bad (horrific) choice and now you want a mulligan?

Nope. Better go figure it out. And, BTW, it’s going to take a long while and lot of work to get out of this hole.

Dimwit.
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
"It's the impact honestly on the employees that weighs the most on me," he said.

Only because the woke failed.........................otherwise those employees were never factored into what they were doing but now all of a sudden the workers on their radar screen as a sympathy play.........because they tried to manipulate their target audience and failed.

I hope beer drinkers tell them to kiss their ass......................
 
Last edited:

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Anheuser-Busch CEO Brendan Whitworth has taken full responsibility for the controversial promotion involving transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney that caused sales to plummet.
Whitworth confirmed that the company will maintain its partnerships without making any changes. He did not explicitly apologize for the collaboration with Mulvaney

No, he did NOT take responsibility. Nor has he apologized for his “tin ear.” Nor has he cut ties with fag groups. And THAT is why they’re crashing. I hope the explosion when they finally crater is heard from “sea to shining sea.”
 

Infoscout

The Dude Abides
If upper management was so worried about their employees, they would have polled them before going woke, they didn’t and yes employees will be laid off because of an executive being stupid, but to be honest they are done, no one around me serves it on tap anymore and the shelf space in the stores are shrinking. Maybe they can sell their wares in Dicks sporting goods?
 

Griz3752

Retired, practising Curmudgeon
Whitworth is a STUPID dick if he thought customers of a blue collar brand were going to idly accept his feel-good social engineering attempt quietly.

Never liked BudLite so I can't even vote by buying another brand.


Sorely tempted to buy a few shares sp I can attend stock holder meetings. I'd be taking a 6-pack of something I liked: probably Shiner Bock or Modela Negra . . . . . .

He needs to focus on better products, less social activity and his staff.

If there's a potential issue for the people who bottle that stuff, Whitworth is to blame, not us!
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
About now I suspect InBev could bottle Clydesdale urine and sell that better than Bud Light.

Hmm. Or scrap the Bud Light Brand entirely, come out with a beer replacement - and call it "Horse Piss" on the label. Even show the Clydesdales on the label.

The name evoking the "your horse has diabetes" bar joke.

Almost always a good joke (and wry introspection) sells better than Trans pandering.

Dobbin
 
Last edited:

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
He's not wrong about the employees, you know. It's the one problem with the boycott tactic.

It doesn't actually hurt those responsible.

The people who make the decisions we go to boycott over, they already had money. Sure, their stock options will suffer. And so too will their 401ks. But they were getting paid big to begin with.

The guy bottling beer for $12 an hour, he had nothing to do with Dylan Mulvaney.

But he's the one who'll suffer for the boycott.
 

Bps1691

Veteran Member
No, he did NOT take responsibility. Nor has he apologized for his “tin ear.” Nor has he cut ties with fag groups. And THAT is why they’re crashing. I hope the explosion when they finally crater is heard from “sea to shining sea.”
I don’t think they’ve even fired the woke over educated leftist woman that authorized and did the campaign in the first place.

As head of the company he is ultimately responsible for what those below him do.

My advice to the shareholders is demand some house cleaning in management starting with the top.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
It doesn't actually hurt those responsible.
Sure it does. If a CEO of a public company does not operate that company in a manner that is considered financially responsible, the shareholders can revolt and force the board of directors to fire that CEO, and even recover monies paid to said CEO. It may even come to pass that, should the malfeasance be severe enough, that said CEO might face criminal prosecution, as well as civil suits.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
Sure it does. If a CEO of a public company does not operate that company in a manner that is considered financially responsible, the shareholders can revolt and force the board of directors to fire that CEO, and even recover monies paid to said CEO. It may even come to pass that, should the malfeasance be severe enough, that said CEO might face criminal prosecution, as well as civil suits.

Maybe, maybe.

But guaranteed the guy on the line will run out of money long before that court case's fourth appeal is settled.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
You tell me. You see the same facts I do.

Is this boycott changing anything? Or is it just getting a lot of regular people who had nothing to do with any of this fired?
The boycott is having an effect that far exceeds the effect on AB. But I don't expect you to understand that, because your analysis skills are so rudimentary. I could explain it to you for hours, and you’d never understand. It seems that you win our arguments more and more often, simply because I can’t stand trying to explain things to someone with the analytical skills of a 5th grader.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Did the CEO consider the innocent children and others being assaulted when he endorsed this thing!
Who?

Bottom line profits. Bigger responsibility to shareholders.

If InBev were a utility, it would be called "The Widows & Orphans" (Common owners of 'blue chip' equities.)

Dobbin
 

raven

TB Fanatic
You tell me. You see the same facts I do.

Is this boycott changing anything? Or is it just getting a lot of regular people who had nothing to do with any of this fired?
It used to be a boycott.
Boycotting is a peaceful protest in order to evoke a change in policy.

This is simply so revolting that people are involuntarily fleeing in droves because it is repugnant.
That is a lot different than boycotting.

If you do not believe it is repugnant, go enjoy your Bud Lite.
Have a six pack.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
It used to be a boycott.
Boycotting is a peaceful protest in order to evoke a change in policy.

This is simply so revolting that people are involuntarily fleeing in droves because it is repugnant.
That is a lot different than boycotting.

If you do not believe it is repugnant, go enjoy your Bud Lite.
Have a six pack.

I don't drink to begin with. So me boycotting Bud Lite will have no effect; they won't lose my business since they never had it to begin with.

All I wondered is if this is really having the impact it was supposed to.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Guess they should have considered their consumer before they ran that ad.

Advertisements, much like elections, have consequences. Wonder how Bush Gardens attendance is this summer?
Probably out-draw Gay Days at Disney, but other than the LGBTQWTFBBQ crowd, the place will be empty.
 

rlm1966

Veteran Member
I don't drink to begin with. So me boycotting Bud Lite will have no effect; they won't lose my business since they never had it to begin with.

All I wondered is if this is really having the impact it was supposed to.
I am sure that other companies are beginning to see the mine field and hopefully will get the message that all busiensses used to know. Never have your company get involved in politics or religion unless you are catering to those fields as all you will end up doing is pissing off at least half of the potential client base with whatever stance you take.
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
I am sure that other companies are beginning to see the mine field and hopefully will get the message that all busiensses used to know. Never have your company get involved in politics or religion unless you are catering to those fields as all you will end up doing is pissing off at least half of the potential client base with whatever stance you take.

That would be welcome news. And the 65,000 finding jobs elsewhere just as welcome.
 

day late

money? whats that?
Wonder what Republican John McCain’s wife, Cindy Anheuser McCain thinks about her family company decisions. Hmmmm

This causes me to wonder. How is McCain's daughter going to view things from now on? I wonder how much this has taken out of her inheritance? I doubt we'll hear anything about that on "The View".
 

bcingu

Senior Member
You tell me. You see the same facts I do.

Is this boycott changing anything? Or is it just getting a lot of regular people who had nothing to do with any of this fired?
Yes it's changing things look at their revenue losses in the billions just like Disney. Your argument is leftist emotional pablum. That's like telling Russia not to shoot the Ukranian soldiers because they are just employees. That is ridiculous.
 

rhughe13

Heart of Dixie
More Sounds of Freedom bells ringing as AB support for the LGBTQ+ pedophile sex slave trade comes crashing down.
 
Top