LEGAL BONNER COHEN: Biden White House Starts End Run Around Supreme Court WOTUS Ruling

Kathy in FL

Administrator
_______________

BONNER COHEN: Biden White House Starts End Run Around Supreme Court WOTUS Ruling​


At an April 23 “Water Summit” at the White House, the Biden administration announced a multi-agency plan reasserting the federal role in determining the future of wetlands in the wake of last year’s landmark Supreme Court Decision limiting Washington’s authority to regulate “waters of the United States” (WOTUS).

The administration’s move on wetlands appears to be part of a concerted effort to get as many rules and regulations as possible in place by the end of the year, in the event there is no second Biden term.

In April, alone, the Biden Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued new rules setting stricter emissions standards for heavy-duty trucks, buses, and other vehicles by 2027, mandated steeper emissions cuts from new natural gas power plants and existing coal plants, and approved a California plan to mandate zero-emissions locomotives on all rail lines in the state by 2030, a move that could be adopted by like-minded states thereby crippling the nation’s vast freight rail network. Zero-emissions locomotives simply do not exist and are not likely to by the arbitrarily set deadline.

To these emissions-related climate policies can now be added to the White House’s effort to tighten federal control over lands and bodies of water.

“The America the Beautiful Freshwater Challenge: A Partnership to Conserve and Restore America’s Rivers, Lakes, Streams, and Wetlands sets a bold, new national goal to protect, restore, and reconnect 8 million acres of wetlands and 100,000 miles of our nation’s rivers and streams,” the White House said in a Fact Sheet.

“To achieve the new national freshwater protection goal and to ensure that our freshwater resources are protected for current and future generations as part of the America the Beautiful Freshwater Challenge, the Biden-Harris administration is also launching a new initiative that calls on states and other governments and entities, including Tribes, interstate organizations, cities, and local communities to advance their own policies and strategies for conserving and restoring America’s freshwater systems,” the White House said. “Over 100 inaugural members from across the country have signed on to support freshwater restoration in their communities, including ten states, eight Tribes, and 24 local governments.”

The initiative can be seen as part of the administration’s larger “30X30” plan, a scheme unveiled in January 2021 to “protect” at least 30% of the nation’s land and water by 2030. That plan was later dubbed “America the Beautiful,” a phrase that has now been incorporated in the new “America the Beautiful Freshwater Challenge.”

The 30X30 plan has run into stiff resistance at the state and local level, where many rural community leaders fear it will bring federal control over land and water use decisions, as well as pose a threat to property rights.

For its part, the White House makes no secret that its latest wetlands initiative is in response to the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Sackett v. EPA, “which dramatically reduced federal protections for wetlands in one of the largest judicial rollbacks of environmental protections in U.S. history.”

In truth, the High Court clarified — at long last — the vague language of the 1972 Clean Water Act that had hitherto allowed EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to claim regulatory jurisdiction over millions of acres of wetlands and other isolated bodies of water with no direct connection to ”navigable waters of the United States.” The Supreme Court’s decision pulled the legal rug out from under the Biden administration’s plans to impose federal zoning on millions of acres of private and public land across the U.S under the guise of protecting wetlands.

Other than announcing it will spend over $1 billion to improve drinking water quality on Tribal lands, $11 million to combat Western megadroughts, $70 million to upgrade dams, culverts, levees, and other water infrastructure and $123 million for the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to expand its coastal management programs, the White House was vague about how it plans to reassert jurisdiction over wetlands. Administration officials must know that any move they make that violates the Supreme Court’s Sackett ruling will invite a flood of lawsuits.

Having proclaimed it is taking an “all of government” approach to what it says is a “climate crisis,” the Biden team is simply practicing what it preaches. All these moves will face stiff legal challenges in any event, so why not push the envelope on putting wetlands back under EPA’s control?

Bonner Russell Cohen, Ph. D. is a senior policy analyst with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).

 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I hope this isn't more of the Agenda 21 crap that we property owners in Oregon spent about two years trying to squash. If you even had an intermittent stream, the state wanted to uphold the goal of regulating what could happen within 25 feet of the banks. No removing native vegetation, (Including poison oak which is native - the bastards) and leaving the banks as is. You could remove a small amount of vegetation but it had to be replaced with plants only on a list. My background was wildlife, not fisheries, but it was obvious that who ever was writing the rules had NO idea how to manage a stream. How were they going to enforce this? Neighbors ratting on neighbors, maybe the periodic pictures they take of everyone's land. It was awful. We won in our county, but some counties had strict regulations. I don't know if they still are still enforced. It is just another means of controlling the population and restricting building.
 
Last edited:

Outlaw-16

Contributing Member
Kind of smells a little like when the EPA wanted to classify seasonal wetlands, the rainy season puddles that might form on your driveway or in your yard, and then claim some kind of exclusion zone that would force you to relocate or tear down any existing structures within that exclusion zone up to and including your primary residence, garage, barn, out building, etc.
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
How were they going to enforce this? Neighbors ratting on neighbors, maybe the periodic pictures they take of everyone's land. I
The corps of engineer has satelite photos of every stream river and lake edge, every year going back at least 50. You put a dock or do some erosion control outside of their definitions.. may be 10 or 12 or 20 years before they see it... and come calling.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
IMHO and feel free to try and change it:

If a reg is put in place by one admin, another admin can come along and change it, or remove it.

If that is true all biden is doing is creating jobs for the next admin to go through and find them and change them.
 

Sandcastle76

Senior Member
The water gambit begin with the “harmless” (NOT) 404 permits that came into being, during the early 80’s. You had to apply to your county ASCS or SWCD office to just clean out your man made, established, drainage ditch on, around or through your crop land acres.
Note: I did make some “new friends“ by helping them write and document correctly, those “seasonally navigable waterways” on their submitted 404 permits.
 

Scrapman

Veteran Member
There's always an altereery motive with these assholes. Don't think for one moment that they give two shits about the country, you, me or tribal water. The name of the plan always has a nice ring to it and once it's passed then you'll find out it's a screw job. Am I wrong.
 
Top