GUNS/RLTD America Should Ban Civilian Guns to Protect Human Rights, Chinese Communist Dictatorship Says

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Oddly enough, the American Left thinks the same thing. Perhaps it's not so odd after all ...
=====================================

http://freebeacon.com/issues/americ...-communist-dictatorship-says-state-run-media/

America Should Ban Civilian Guns to Protect Human Rights, Chinese Communist Dictatorship Says Through State-Run Media
'The U.S. should learn from China and genuinely protect human rights'
BY: Stephen Gutowski
March 7, 2018 2:35 pm

The Chinese communist dictatorship called on the United States to ban guns through a recent editorial in a state-run media outlet late last month.

The editorial, titled "China Can Offer Lessons to U.S. in Protecting Human Rights," ran in the Global Times, an organ of the Chinese government, on Feb. 22 after the shooting in Parkland, Fla. It first applauded protests against the government before advocating for disarming civilians.

"Thousands of protesters, led by survivors of last week's shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, congregated at the Florida State Capitol building Wednesday," said the regime, which brutally slaughtered thousands of protesters during a 1989 pro-democracy protest in Tiananmen Square. "Their message: Never again. Never again will a murderer purchase a gun easily."

The editorial went on to argue that though the United States was "founded on the use of firearms," things in the United States are now "different from that of more than 200 years ago." It said the United States must impose new gun-control laws.

"There is an urgent need for the US to impose harsh restrictions on gun purchases nowadays," it said. "The US has witnessed mad proliferation of guns and rampant gun violence."

The editorial went on to cite an unlinked CNN report on mass shootings as partial justification for its argument.

"The US has no other choice but to adopt gun control," it said. "The right of life is the most fundamental human rights. The right to bear arms cannot overpower the individual's right to live."

The Chinese communist party has a long and well-documented history of flagrant human rights violations. It commonly violates the rights of its people through censorship, forced abortions, outlawing dissent, and even state-sanctioned killing. Former communist dictator Mao Zedong is the worst mass murderer in history with his policies killing upwards of 100 million people.
Xi Jinping, the head of the party, was recently granted sweeping new powers and effectively a lifetime appointment by the China's People's Congress, which serves as merely a symbolic body that has never vetoed a proposal from the communist party. He is now considered the most powerful communist leader in China since Mao Zedong.

Still, the Chinese government rejected criticism of its own record of human rights abuses in the editorial and instead claimed the United States not disarming its civilian population amounts to a human rights abuse.

"Washington has been pointing an accusing finger at other countries over human rights issue," the editorial said. "However, more Americans have been killed by gunfire in the country than American soldiers being killed in all US wars. It's inhumane for the US, which boasts about its human rights record, to turn a blind eye to gun violence, snub increasing calls for gun control and risk more innocent lives."

The Chinese government insisted the United States would have to adopt a civilian gun ban and pointed to its own disarming of civilians as an example of the country protecting human rights.
"The US will have to adopt gun control in the future," the editorial said. "Gun ownership in China is strictly regulated, which helps reduce gun-related crimes and deaths. The US should learn from China and genuinely protect human rights. If the US does not control its guns, problems caused by firearms in the foreseeable future will continue plaguing US society."

However, despite the claims of the Chinese government, China does experience mass shootings. Mass knife attacks are more common in the country, though, including a widely-publicized attack by political dissidents in 2014 that left 29 dead and 130 more injured.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Protection of human rights in China -

hqdefault.jpg
 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
First Iran, now this yutz. What's next, Lil Rocket Man? Maybe Putin will come vodka-ing out of the woodwork to tell us to ban guns!
 

L.A.B.

Goodness before greatness.
In 1992 I picked up a poster of ‘That Chinese Student’ standing in front of the tank. It represented to me the thirst of the human spirit to risk being free from overbearing authority.

One year later I met an accomplished martial artist from Tawain. He was trained very traditional from a young age by his uncle who had authored a few books in Tawain on M/A. He loved to train full contact with his brother in law who was Taiwanese Special Forces in that era. Once a week we would train for a couple hours in various settings. He was very serious about the sovereignty of Tawain.

Later that year in 1993 I introduced him to my original martial art of shooting. Immediately, he got it! He totally understood the legitimacy of this new art form, and why every free man should pursue the fitness and finesse of bearing arms.

American culture can be difficult for tyrants to maneuver around. Believe me, that concept is well understood by my freedom loving friends of all nationalities.
 

West

Senior
Protection of human rights in China -

hqdefault.jpg

Yes, in that pic. It's showing how big socialistic type government enforcers practice safe gun handeling, practice, and shooting. Text book....Government "gun control".
 
Last edited:

dstraito

TB Fanatic
Hmmm, the left wants to be communist.

The way to achieve that is with gun control.

The communist leaders from other countries are stating we ne d to give up our guns.

Cold

Dead

Hands
 

4RIVERS

Veteran Member
Hmmm, the left wants to be communist.

The way to achieve that is with gun control.

The communist leaders from other countries are stating we ne d to give up our guns.

Cold

Dead

Hands

I would prefer the cold, dead hands be on them.

Remember, to win, you make the other guy die for his cause.
 

Illini Warrior

Illini Warrior
the LARGEST slave state in the world - 90% nothing but political prisoners - ya - tell us to disarm and become Chinese ....
 

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
Says a country that as MURDERED MILLIONS of it's own citizens......yeah that holds water. BUGGER OFF CHINKS!
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
Maybe Pence will come out and suggest the Chicoms arm all their citizens...easy to prevent an invasion that way. :D
 

ainitfunny

Saved, to glorify God.
Are young people today even taught about the HORRORS committed by anyone except Hitler?
And I bet the part about Hitler disarming the German citizens is NOT taught!
I’m willing to bet that young people are operating in utter ignorance of what History teaches us about disarmed citizens.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
"America Should Ban Civilian Guns to Protect Human Rights, Chinese Communist Dictatorship Says"

Oh, the irony.
 

vector7

Dot Collector
Communist China: ‘Private Ownership Of Guns’ In U.S. ‘Serious Problem,’ Must ‘Change’

December 31, 2019

China.jpg


Communist China, which currently has millions of people locked away in concentration camps, said in state-controlled media this week that the Second Amendment is a “serious problem” and that there needs to be “change” in how the American public views “private ownership of guns.”

The Global Times, which is Chinese state-run media, published the op-ed after a good guy with a gun in Texas stopped a shooting in a church.

China mocked the United States, saying that “shootings are shocking in a US allegedly governed by law”:

Private gun ownership is a tradition from the early days at the founding of the US. In a modern society, the problems created by this tradition have already exceeded the benefits. …

American society has already seen serious problems caused by the private ownership of guns, but their massive number has contributed to an enormous inertia. Many interest groups have benefited from it and some ordinary people have truly gained a sense of safety. To change this habit which has lasted hundreds of years, tremendous political courage and a rearrangement of interests is required.

Facts have proved that the US system is unable to handle the intricacies of countless issues around guns including politics, economics, law and order and public psychology. The country can neither manage the safe storage and use of so many guns owned by ordinary people, nor can it establish a new national system that bans or strictly restricts guns. It cannot even form an overwhelming opinion regarding gun issues.

China’s attack on the Second Amendment comes after Hong Kong protesters have requested to have their own Second Amendment so they can defend themselves from the oppressive communist Chinese government.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping had received a title that was normally reserved for Communist China’s founder Mao Zedong, who is the most prolific mass murderer in human history:

During a two-day meeting that ended Friday, chaired by Mr. Xi, the party’s 25-member Politburo hailed his policies as visionary and described him as the renmin lingxiu, or “people’s leader,” a designation that directly echoes an accolade most closely associated with Communist China’s founder Mao Zedong.

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) fired back at Xi in a statement that highlighted just a few of the horrifying human rights abuses that communist China is inflicting on its citizens. Sasse wrote:

If Chairman Xi is the “people’s leader,” who are the people? When Chairman Xi talks about “the people,” he doesn’t mean the Uyghurs in torture camps. When Chairman Xi talks about “the people,’ he doesn’t mean the Falun Gong prisoners whose organs are harvested. When Chairman Xi talks about “the people,” he doesn’t mean the baby girls who were left to die under China’s one-child policy. When Chairman Xi talks about “the people,” he means what every communist hack before him has meant: not the people but the communist party.

As The Daily Wire has highlighted, “China has been under intense scrutiny as the communist nation has millions of Muslims locked in concentration camps, is harvesting organs from detainees, and has created a massive surveillance state that it is reportedly exporting to countries around the world.”
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
I’m speechless. There is so much blatant hypocrisy in this story that I don’t know where to begin.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
And it will soon be a two year old story, too.

The communist version of the Mighty Wurlitzer is tuning up for the finale....
 

PghPanther

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Wasn't it the Soviet Union said they could never put troops on American soil because their would be citizens behind every blade of grass with guns loaded?

Seem like the Chinese know that too but won't admit it....or perhaps they know the social Marxist are doing their part to try to soften us up............but that they are still wary of the remaining armed Patriots (er excuse me but domestic terrorist as the media refers to them)
 

Groucho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Estimates run as high as 70-million citizens killed by the Communist Chinese in the 20th century. And we have to disarm? I think not.
 

Groucho

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Wasn't it the Soviet Union said they could never put troops on American soil because their would be citizens behind every blade of grass with guns loaded?

Seem like the Chinese know that too but won't admit it....or perhaps they know the social Marxist are doing their part to try to soften us up............but that they are still wary of the remaining armed Patriots (er excuse me but domestic terrorist as the media refers to them)
Japan. It was, I believe, Adm. Yamamoto who was the architect of the Pear Harbor raid.
 

vector7

Dot Collector
And it will soon be a two year old story, too.

The communist version of the Mighty Wurlitzer is tuning up for the finale....

Flashbacks:
U.N. Peacekeepers Can Shorten Civil Wars, But it Takes Lots of Troops

May 10th, 2019
Posted by Bert Gambini-Buffalo

UN-peacekeepers_1660.jpg


(Credit: United Nations Photo/Flickr)

University at Buffalo

United Nations peacekeeping operations can shorten civil wars, but need robust troop deployments to move parties toward negotiated settlements such as ceasefires and peace agreements, researchers say.

While most research on PKOs measure their influence on maintaining postwar peace, a new study instead addresses the UN peacekeeping operations’ ability to increase the likelihood of a peaceful conflict resolution.

“Since the end of the Cold War, UN troops have been entering active conflicts, often peacemaking, not peacekeeping,” says Michelle Benson, an associate professor in the political science department at the University at Buffalo. “And not all of these operations are created the same in their ability to facilitate faster negotiated settlements.
“The UN is not only able to improve the conflict situation. It’s able to bring conflicts to a conclusion in a peaceful manner.”​
“Peacekeeping forces in the range of approximately 10,000 troops significantly improve the likelihood of ending hostilities. Failing to meet those numbers will make the effort much less effective.”

Benson and coauthor Jacob Kathman, associate professor of political science, used fine-grained monthly data sets built from Kathman’s UN peacekeeping troop data and the Peace Research Institute Oslo’s Uppsala Conflict Data Program. The findings appear in the Journal of Conflict Resolution.

Civil wars can end in a number of ways, Benson says. One side can emerge victorious. Violence can subside without a clear victor, but with the underlying cause of the conflict remaining unresolved. Then there are peace agreements and other official ways to end the fighting, such as ceasefires.

“That’s what we look at in this study: How do you get to a peaceful negotiated settlement and are peacekeepers able to facilitate that,” says Benson. “We found that the presence of a sufficient number of peacekeepers decreased the time to a peaceful negotiated settlement.”

The UN deploys peacekeeping operations when the permanent members of the Security Council (China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States) authorize troop funding, which is then subject to General Assembly approval. The UN has no standing army. Member states provide troops for the operation on a voluntary basis.

For the study, Kathman and Benson build on previous research on how the UN affects civil war. They say their paper has important policy implications that help validate the effectiveness of PKOs and supports the idea that the UN should outfit peacekeeping efforts with sufficient troop numbers required to reduce the hostility and intractability of civil conflicts.

“From prior research on the UN, we know that UN peacekeepers are able to reduce civilian deaths and casualties and sometimes able to reduce the number of battlefield fatalities,” Benson says. “But what happens if these troops dampen the active fighting to the point that a low-level conflict remains, what’s called a ‘hurting stalemate’?”

In the absence of a peaceful resolution, the “hurting stalemate” could mean a reduction in the immediate number of deaths, but the enduring balance of forces might eventually translate to a high number of deaths in the long term. “That’s what we wanted to determine,” Benson says.

The researchers theorize that facilitating a security guarantee and separating combatants are among the mechanisms that troops use to facilitate a settlement.

With substantial troop deployments, the UN can help separate the combatants, assist with disarmament, and provide a clear path for the unobstructed flow of information between sides, allowing the warring parties to move more quickly toward settlements.

“The UN is not only able to improve the conflict situation,” says Benson. “It’s able to bring conflicts to a conclusion in a peaceful manner.”

“Considered in its broader context, these are important findings,” says Kathman. “The UN’s reputation amongst the American public is one of relative impotence, but our findings contribute to a growing consensus of rigorous analyses that UN peacekeeping works.

“In many cases, if peacekeeping operations hadn’t been deployed, those conflicts would likely have been much more violent and protracted.”

Source: University at Buffalo


China completes registration of 8,000-strong UN peacekeeping force, defence ministry says

Expanded unit fulfils pledge made by Xi Jinping, and will give soldiers chance to experience real-life combat situations, military watchers say

Sarah Zheng
Published: 9:10pm, 29 Sep, 2017
Updated: 2:55pm, 20 Jul, 2018

4efd5cb8-a4f7-11e7-84b5-dfc1701cb40c_1280x720_211014.JPG

China last week completed the registration of a UN standby peacekeeping force comprising 8,000 troops from infantry, helicopter and transport units. Photo: Xinhua

China is set to play a bigger role in United Nations peacekeeping missions while also providing its military with real-life training opportunities after completing the registration of 8,000 troops last week, analysts said...

China registers 8,000 troops for UN peacekeeping missions
 

Fake Shemp

Banned for resurrecting the mayonnaise thread
This is exactly what the founders were thinking when they drafted the second amendment. Stories like this and what’s going on in Virginia right now. More important than ever. Tyrants.
 
Top