For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...ied_after_isis_attack_on_secret_firebase.html
March 21, 2016
Marine killed in Iraq died after ISIS attack on secret firebase
By Rick Moran
Comments 17
A detachment from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit has set up a secret firebase in northern Iraq to support operations of the U.S. and coalition forces fighting ISIS.
On Saturday, ISIS targeted the firebase, firing two rockets, one of which landed inside the base killing one Marine and wounding several others.
Initially, the Pentagon claimed that the Marine, Staff Sgt. Louis F. Cardin, of Temecula, California, was killed by "indirect fire" from ISIS. But it seems clear that ISIS saw the Marines moving into the firebase and fired directly into the base.
The existence of a combat unit in Iraq that could be targeted by ISIS was unknown until the rocket attack. The Pentagon claims it was going to announce the existence of the base sometime this week.
CNN:
The Pentagon has yet to formally acknowledge it has established its first U.S. fire base in Iraq in the current fight against ISIS for what the official said will eventually be a limited ground combat operation in support of the Iraqis.
The Marines will be using their field artillery guns in the coming weeks to help defend Iraqi troops as they move towards Mosul. For now, the artillery is to defend another nearby base where American troops are getting 5,000 Iraqi forces ready for the operation to retake Mosul.
The Marines first began moving into the area just two weeks ago from their own base of operations aboard an amphibious assault ship the USS Kearsarge, the defense official told CNN.
The Marines had finished setting up and testing their artillery just two or three days before the attack. There was a brief mention of a coalition fire base in a statement Saturday announcing the death of the Marine, but the official said the only troops there are American Marines and no other coalition forces.
On Sunday, the coalition announced that in consultation with the government of Iraq, the U.S. "has assigned a detachment of U.S. Marines from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit to the support of Iraqi Security Force and Coalition ground operations. The detachment from the 26th MEU will add to the Marines and Sailors currently in Iraq" supporting the effort against ISIS.
The Marines have already named the location "Fire Base Bell." The U.S has similar artillery at two other large Iraqi bases, but Bell is the only known fire base. That terminology signifies this is a small remote location designed to use its artillery to support infantry troops at forward locations.
Why the secrecy? Probably because President Obama had assured the American people many times previously that there would be no combat troops deployed to Iraq.
Of course, this puts a great big bullseye on the backs of those Marines, billeting them out in the middle of nowhere, making them highly vulnerable to ISIS artillery and rocket attacks.
It's one thing to have special operators assisting the Iraqis with training, lasing targets for U.S. warplanes, or assassinating high-value ISIS targets.
But Marines are lethal weapons. They are there to kill ISIS fighters and the fact that we are using one of our crack Marine outfits as part of this deployment changes the character of our intervention in Iraq.
__
Comments....
Terry L Walker • an hour ago
The problem is not which unit is fighting, conventional, Army, Marine or Special Operations: What is the strategy and where is the campaign plan that clearly defines a "Road to Victory"? What does success look like? How is success measured in the plan? What are the phases of the operation. What resources will be required to successfully execute the plan. Who IS The Enemy!
Soon we will mark the 15 year anniversary of this "Global War on Terrorism" yet nowhere have I seen a National Strategy that clearly, unambiguously declares our mission and endstate. During this same time; I was not just a casual observer. Having served many years, forward deployed, I could never gain the simple answers to my questions above. At the unit level, we knew exactly who we were fighting and our mission was to kill them. It's the Strategy that is lacking and we fail to DEMAND a coherent Strategy and Plan for destroying our Enemy!
Yes, much of our National Strategy will by necessity be classified. But, Americans need to know the "Overarching" blueprint that we are asked to execute and risk life and treasure for. So what is that Plan!
6 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
patrioticsonuntildeath > Terry L Walker • 23 minutes ago
Another Bozo operation dictated by political interests instead of allowing the military to do what is necessary to win decisively.
I dream of the day the Washington calls in the heads of all military forces and says, "OK, guys. The only way to win is to set you free to come up with a plan to win decisively and then set you loose, with no political oversight."
1 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Sideshowjoe • an hour ago
Those Marines must be barefoot because Ocrappo promised us no boots on the ground....
3 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
BoDeen > Sideshowjoe • an hour ago
Didn't you hear? All the infantry now wears Birkenstocks.
And MREs are all vegan.
2 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Lance Corvette • 2 hours ago
"It's one thing to have special operators assisting the Iraqis with training, lasing targets for U.S. warplanes, or assassinating high-value ISIS targets."
I fail to see the difference between that and ground combat. We're either engaged in combat with them or not. The author is only pointing out a question of degree.
3 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Drumlinfarmer • 2 hours ago
Did we ever get a declaration of war? Where's code pink?
3 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Allston • 2 hours ago
Not so secret, apparently.
2 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
GeezerGeek > Allston • an hour ago
Only a secret kept from the American people. Thanks for the transparency, Barry!
6 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
BoDeen • an hour ago
Baghdad O-bob-ma has assured us that there are no US combat troops in Iraq.
1 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Stefan Kristen • an hour ago
Moran,
"Indirect fire" doesn't meant that ISIS was out lobbing rocket into herds of mountain goats and happened to drop one on a Marine fire base. That would be a "miss". Indirect fire means that the target wasn't in the direct line of sight of the weapon. You make it sound like using the term "indirect fire" just means it was a lucky shot. Hardly!
1 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
RMThoughts • an hour ago
We talk of fighting ISIS yet never once mentioning the fact that through our Middle Eastern allies are more than capable of strangling completely ISIS’ logistical lifelines and preventing the torrent of foreign fighters and arms from reinforcing ISIS positions in Syria and Iraq .
Instead of holding accountable US’ allies who are clearly underwriting ISIS’ continued and formidable fighting capacity as well as its expansion beyond Iraq and Syria’s borders, several times the committee agreed to work even closer with these allies in what is clearly a disingenuous war on ISIS. Fighting ISIS is but a pretext to remain involved in Syria, Iraq, and now Libya and Afghanistan.
1 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
mhubb • 2 hours ago
so
we are setting up a base, but we do not setup defenses???
there are weapon systems that can shoot down rockets
and track where they came from to hit back at the site
2 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Shad_ow > mhubb • 32 minutes ago
Did they return fire? I would think not under the traitor's command. Barack has been arming and funding ISIS in his attempts to take out Assad. He wouldn't want to harm them.
1 △ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
SupremeGalooty • 15 minutes ago
Rather than fight under Obama as Commander in Chief <:-(
I would take my chances with the Sodomites in Leavenworth
We have No Business sending our military ANYWHERE under this Bozo.
△ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
SupremeGalooty > SupremeGalooty • 14 minutes ago
(My apologies to Bozo the Clown.)
△ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
Pat Corcoran • 24 minutes ago
"Why the secrecy? Probably because President Obama had assured the American people many times previously that there would be no combat troops deployed to Iraq.
Of course, this puts a great big bullseye on the backs of those Marines, billeting them out in the middle of nowhere, making them highly vulnerable to ISIS artillery and rocket attacks.
It's one thing to have special operators assisting the Iraqis with training, lasing targets for U.S. warplanes, or assassinating high-value ISIS targets.
But Marines are lethal weapons. They are there to kill ISIS fighters and the fact that we are using one of our crack Marine outfits as part of this deployment changes the character of our intervention in Iraq."
- By our President lying about American involvement in Iraq he hopes to camouflage
the bullseye he placed on our troops that he continues to brag about withdrawing.
△ ▽
•
Reply
•
Share ›
Avatar
boligat • 2 hours ago
At least the special operators are mobile.