ALERT The Winds of War Blow in Korea and The Far East

jward

passin' thru
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
ATTACK U.S, KIM'S REGIME DOOMED | NUCLEAR SUB ARRIVES IN SOUTH KOREA

"Any nuclear attack by North Korea against the United States or its allies ... will result in the end of the Kim regime," U.S. warned, following the U.S.-South Korea meeting in Washington.

USS Missouri arrives in Busan, South Korea - strategic move amidst China's and North Korea's nuclear developments.

Source: Reuters
 

jward

passin' thru
Insider Paper
@TheInsiderPaper

BREAKING: North Korea fires second ballistic missile toward East Sea within 24 hours, South Korea says

5:32 PM · Dec 17, 2023
33.4K
Views

OSINTdefender
@sentdefender

A Ballistic Missile has just been launched by North Korea towards the Sea of Japan; this is their Second Missile Test within the last 24 hours.
 

jward

passin' thru
thediplomat.com
Philippines Expecting Further Chinese Escalation in South China Sea, Official Says
Sebastian Strangio

ASEAN Beat | Security | Southeast Asia

After a tumultuous 2023, the Philippines is set for another year of confrontation in contested waters.

Philippines Expecting Further Chinese Escalation in South China Sea, Official Says

In this photo issued by the Philippine Coast Guard, China Coast Guard vessels fire water cannons at Philippine fisheries bureau ships in the vicinity of Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, December 9, 2023.
Credit: X/Jay Tarriela

The Philippines is anticipating an escalation of hostilities by Chinese vessels in the South China Sea, following two dangerous incidents in contested parts of the waterway earlier this week.

In an interview with CNN Philippines that was aired late on Wednesday, Alberto Carlos, chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ (AFP) Palawan-based Western Command, said that the military was expecting “more coercive actions from China, short of armed attack.”

Carlos’ comments come after a pair of dangerous incidents over the weekend. One saw Chinese vessels collide with and shoot water cannons at Philippine vessels seeking to resupply troops stationed at Second Thomas Shoal in the Spratly Islands. The other saw China fire water cannons at three fisheries bureau vessels that were sending oil and groceries to fishermen near Scarborough Shoal, in a different part of the South China Sea. Both lie well within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.

“It’s already escalating… we expect more coercive action from China,” Carlos told CNN. “After water cannon, we expect ramming, we expect them to attempt to board our vessel, which is something that we will not allow them to do.”

Carlos said that China would limit its actions to those that “short of armed attacks,” to avoid triggering a U.S. response under the Mutual Defense Treaty, which obliges Washington and Manila to come to one another’s aid in the event of an attack on either. He added that the AFP had conducted war games and other exercises assessing how China might escalate its “gray zone” campaign against the Philippine-held features.

“We’re brainstorming this, we are wargaming this and we are prepared for any contingency that will happen,” said Carlos.

The weekend’s incidents, which left one Philippine supply ship disabled and damaged the mast of a Philippine Coast Guard vessel, cap off a year that has seen a sharp increase in the frequency and intensity of China’s assertive actions in the South China Sea. Many of them, including the laser incident referenced by Carlos above, have involved attempts to prevent the Philippines from resupplying Second Thomas Shoal, where a small contingent of Philippine troops is stationed aboard the BRP Sierra Madre, a grounded warship.

This is likely due to a Chinese assessment that the decrepit World War II-era vessel, battered by corrosive sea winds and ocean spray, will soon collapse into the ocean, giving China an opportunity to occupy the feature. As Ray Powell, the director of the SeaLight project at Stanford University’s Gordian Knot Center for National Security Innovation, told Newsweek last month, China “seeks to outlast the Philippines at Second Thomas Shoal until either the ship breaks up or otherwise becomes uninhabitable, or until Manila grows weary of running the blockade.” As it happens, the AFP’s Western Command announced that five Chinese militia vessels were spotted at Second Thomas Shoal yesterday, along with another four in the vicinity.

Taken together, this concatenation of incidents and confrontations could be pushing Philippine attitudes toward something of a tipping-point. On Tuesday, the Philippines summoned the Chinese ambassador to protest the “back-to-back harassments,” with the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs stating that “the actions of the Chinese vessels within the Philippine exclusive economic zone are illegal and violate the freedom of navigation.” President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. also stated that that the actions “have only further steeled our determination to defend and protect our nation’s sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea.” The Chinese actions were also denounced by Western nations including the U.S., Australia, and Canada.

As it stands, without Chinese efforts to defuse the situation, 2024 is shaping up to be another year of escalating confrontation in the South China Sea – one that raises the risk that a misstep by either side could set off a wider conflict. Yesterday, Philippine lawmakers allocated 100 million pesos ($1.79 million) in funds for the building of a permanent structure on Second Thomas Shoal under the 2024 national budget. China has previously declared its staunch opposition to the construction of any permanent shelter on the shoal.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use......

China’s ‘Civilian Bases’ In India’s Backyard New Security Threat As Beijing Could Keep The Border Boiling​

By Guest Author
-
December 18, 2023

OPED By Gp Cpt TP Srivastava

Scar of the 1962 debacle is still fresh in Indian minds, both civil and military. It was a war that ought not to have ended as it did. The primary and sole reason for this unqualified and unwarranted humiliation was entirely due to despicable decision-making by the political outfit.


In October 1962, the IAF was one of Asia’s most formidable air powers. But for fear of escalation, our political leadership willfully surrendered to a weak adversary who had no Air Power elements to support the Chinese Army on the ground.

The report on the 1962 debacle, famously known as the Henderson-Bhagat report, continues to languish in some cupboards of the government of India. It was taken out for referral only when the Subrahmanyam committee examined the 1999 Kargil War fiasco.

Terrain​

In the Chinese context, any offensive, both ground and air, must be viewed in the context of terrain for ground troops’ operations and the location of suitable airfields. Air Power will invariably spearhead any future conventional warfare anywhere. It must be candidly stated at this stage: “No future conflict can be won without Air Power. However, Air Power by itself cannot win any conventional war”.

Chinese Air Force is called the People’s Liberation Army – Air Force (PLAAF). A look at the map will indicate that no PLAAF element operating from mainland China can reach Indian targets in the Ladakh region and Arunachal Pradesh entirely due to the limited radius of action. Even with mid-air refueling, it would be operationally unviable, though theoretically feasible.

Chinese leadership decided to build nearly 18 airfields in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR). Most airfields, barring a couple, are at an elevation of 3 km or more. Sustained operations from high-altitude airfields impose massive restrictions on operations in terms of weapon load, extended take-off, and landing run.

Weather​

If PLAAF elements have to support ground operations, they must operate from airfields in TAR, which experience some of the most hostile weather for more than six months a year.

For eight months in a year (September to April), operations will be severely affected due to extremely low temperatures, icy, strong surface winds, and extensive ice accumulation over the runway from November to February.

Few airfields, particularly in the Chengdu Military Region, are affected by extensive fog. Sustained day/night operations are virtually impossible. Maintenance activity in sub-zero temperatures is a nightmare.

Operational Airfields Of PLAAF​

Chinese Military is governed by seven military regions (MRs) subdivided into Military Districts (MDs). Two MRs facing India are Lanzhou MR opposite Ladakh sector and Chengdu MR opposite Arunachal Pradesh (North Eastern region of India).

Lanzhou MR. Two MDs of Lanzhou MR face India. South Xinjiang MD is opposite UP, HP, and Ladakh. East Xinjiang MD faces Ladakh.

Chengdu MR. Two MDs of this MR are in Indian proximity. Yunan MD is opposite Myanmar, and Xizang MD is opposite Arunachal, Assam, and Sikkim.

PLAAF can operate from about 15 bases in TAR. However, because of the distance from TBA, only five PLAAF airfields can support air operations in the Tactical BATTLE Area (TBA). These airfields are:

  • Lanzhou MR. Khotan and Hoping
  • Chengdu MR. Kongka Dzong, Donshoon and Pangta
Of these five airfields, only Khotan is at a lower elevation of 1,400 meters (nearly the same as Srinagar). The remaining four airfields are above 3,500 meters. Other airfields are Chengdu, Jekundo, Kantse, Kashgar, Kunming, Mangshi, Nagchuka I&II, Paoshan and Petun.

The load-carrying capacity drops markedly at these altitudes. Due to the much higher True Air Speed while landing, there is massive pressure on breaks. For instance, a pair of main wheel tires might survive 50 landings at the sea-level airfield. However, at these airfields, it might survive only five.

PLAAF Capability Ex-TAR​

  • PLAAF inventory of fighters has inducted the latest platforms, namely J-20, etc. However, the workhorse of PLAAF remains Su-27/30 variants.
  • Airfield infrastructure at most airfields cannot sustain large-scale operations.
  • Snow and ice accretion on the runway poses a severe challenge to operations during winters. During warmer months, melting snow also causes impediments.
  • The entire TBA is undulating hilly terrain, causing severe problems for tracking and targeting ground targets.
  • Airlift Capability, both fixed wing and rotary wing, is also restricted.
  • Radar cover at medium level might be available, but below 500 meters AGL, it is virtually non-existent due to terrain.
  • PLAAF will likely deploy man-portable SAM systems in large numbers, particularly around operational bases. These would pose a formidable threat to IAF strike elements.
  • Night operations are doubtful.

IAF Capability​

  • IAF has more than a dozen operational bases facing China. Bareilly, Gorakhpur, Bagdogra, Hashimara, Jorhat, Gauhati, Tezpur, Chabua, Mohanbari, Jammu, Udhampur, Srinagar, Avantipur, Leh, Thoise, and nearly 15 Advance Landing Grounds (ALGs), which can support limited transport and helicopter operations.
  • Although fewer in numbers, the throw weight of IAF fighters will match PLAAF because IAF fighters can and will lift off with maximum weapon load from near sea-level airfields.

Effectiveness Of PLAAF​

Due to terrain factors, the PLAAF does not pose a substantive threat to our ground forces or the IAF infrastructure. Even in the future, irrespective of the type of flying machines acquired by PLAAF, it will not pose a severe challenge to the Indian military.

For this reason, China is unlikely to embark on a full-scale conventional weapon offensive against India. What is of significance is that China did not open another front during the 1965, 1971, and 1999 wars/skirmishes with Pakistan. China cannot sustain an offensive.

However, if diplomacy fails and China can operate from sea-level airfields of Myanmar and Bangladesh, PLAAF will pose a grave challenge. This could be a big security threat to India as New Delhi is not really prepared for a Chinese offensive from these regions.

China’s Naval Threat​

Yulin Naval Base near Sanya in Hainan province is the closest naval base, nearly 3,500 km (as the crow flies) from India’s southernmost point. Hence, if China has to bring its Naval Armada, its fleet will follow a circuitous route. Its logistics support will be stretched and unlikely to support offensive operations.

Chinese Aircraft Carriers cannot operate in hostile air environments even if the CBGs decide to transit the Straits of Malacca. Hence, any formidable naval threat from China is ruled out. However, the Chinese submarine fleet will pose a danger to Indian ships.

Continued.....
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Continued......

Nuclear Weapon Option​

Chinese nuclear arsenal is more potent and far more significant than India’s in terms of the number of warheads, cargo, and range. However, India is quite capable of formidable and effective retaliatory strikes. China is unlikely to exercise the nuclear option against India. However, it would remain a threat in the meantime.

Tenets of Chinese Governance​

President Xi announced a 12-point precept of the Chinese governance model in February 2023, which is:

  1. Respecting the sovereignty of all countries. Universally recognized international law, including the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter, must be strictly observed. All countries’ sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity must be effectively upheld. All nations, big or small, strong or weak, rich or poor, are equal members of the international community. All parties should jointly uphold the basic norms of international relations and defend global fairness and justice. Equal and uniform application of international law should be promoted, while double standards must be rejected.
  2. Abandoning the Cold War mentality. The security of a country should not be pursued at the expense of others. The security of a region should not be achieved by strengthening or expanding military blocs. All countries’ legitimate security interests and concerns must be addressed seriously and appropriately. There is no simple solution to a complex issue. All parties should, following the vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable security and bearing in mind the long-term peace and stability of the world, help forge a balanced, effective, and sustainable European security architecture. All parties should oppose pursuing one’s security at the cost of others’ security, prevent bloc confrontation, and work together for peace and stability on the Eurasian Continent.
  3. Ceasing hostilities. Conflict and war benefit no one. All parties must stay rational, exercise restraint, avoid fanning the flames and aggravating tensions, and prevent the crisis from deteriorating or spiraling out of control. All parties should support Russia and Ukraine in working in the same direction and resuming direct dialogue as quickly as possible to de-escalate the situation and ultimately reach a comprehensive ceasefire.
  4. Resuming peace talks. Dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis. All efforts conducive to the peaceful settlement of the problem must be encouraged and supported. The international community should stay committed to the right approach of promoting talks for peace, helping parties in conflict open the door to a political settlement as soon as possible, and creating conditions and platforms for the resumption of negotiation. China will continue to play a constructive role in this regard.
  5. Resolving the humanitarian crisis. All measures conducive to easing the humanitarian crisis must be encouraged and supported. Humanitarian operations should follow the principles of neutrality and impartiality, and humanitarian issues should not be politicized. The safety of civilians must be effectively protected, and humanitarian corridors should be set up to evacuate civilians from conflict zones. Efforts are needed to increase humanitarian assistance to relevant areas, improve humanitarian conditions, and provide rapid, safe, and unimpeded humanitarian access to prevent a humanitarian crisis on a larger scale. The UN should be supported in coordinating and channeling humanitarian aid to conflict zones.
  6. Protecting civilians and prisoners of war (POWs). Parties to the conflict should strictly abide by international humanitarian law, avoid attacking civilians or civilian facilities, protect women, children, and other victims of the conflict, and respect the fundamental rights of POWs. China supports the exchange of POWs between Russia and Ukraine and calls on all parties to create more favorable conditions for this purpose.
  7. Keeping nuclear power plants safe. China opposes armed attacks against nuclear power plants or other peaceful nuclear facilities and calls on all parties to comply with international law, including the Convention on Nuclear Safety (CNS), and firmly avoid man-made nuclear accidents. China supports the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in playing a constructive role in promoting the safety and security of peaceful nuclear facilities.
  8. Reducing strategic risks. Nuclear weapons must not be used, and nuclear wars must not be fought. The threat or use of nuclear weapons should be opposed. Nuclear proliferation must be prevented, and nuclear crisis avoided. China opposes the research, development, and usage of chemical and biological weapons by any country under any circumstances.
  9. Facilitating grain exports. All parties need to implement the Black Sea Grain Initiative signed by Russia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the UN fully and effectively in a balanced manner and support the UN in playing an essential role in this regard. The cooperation initiative on global food security proposed by China provides a feasible solution to the global food crisis.
  10. Stopping unilateral sanctions. Unilateral sanctions and maximum pressure cannot solve the issue; they only create new problems. China opposes unilateral sanctions unauthorized by the UN Security Council. Relevant countries should stop abusing unilateral sanctions and “long-arm jurisdiction” against other countries to do their share in de-escalating the Ukraine crisis and create conditions for developing countries to grow their economies and better the lives of their people.
  11. Keeping industrial and supply chains stable. All parties should earnestly maintain the existing world economic system and oppose using the world economy as a tool or weapon for political purposes. Joint efforts are needed to mitigate the spillovers of the crisis and prevent it from disrupting international cooperation in energy, finance, food trade, and transportation and undermining the global economic recovery.
  12. Promoting post-conflict reconstruction. The international community needs to take measures to support post-conflict reconstruction in conflict zones. China stands ready to provide assistance and play a constructive role in this endeavor.

Internal Governance In China​

China has an unseen and unheard governing model, which keeps tabs on the governing apparatus known to the world.

The Beidaihe meeting, or the ‘Summer Summit’ as it is known to China watchers, is held annually in the resort town of Heibei province. The conference is an informal discussion opportunity attended by Chinese elders and current leadership. Most of the proceedings are behind closed doors. During the 2023 meeting, the atmosphere was tense and strained. President Xi was supposedly reprimanded and questioned by the elders on various national and international issues.


To project Chinese threat/power, China’s attempts towards territorial expansion in the South China Sea region have taken precedence over the Chinese focus on India. The Permanent Court of Arbitration gave an adverse judgment against China in the Philipines case. However, China refused to accept the decision. Chinese have been actively creating artificial islands, with a few hosting operational forces. This fact indicates the Chinese political aim of controlling its neighborhood littoral states. Taiwan remains a top priority issue. China is probably waiting for Presidential elections in Taiwan in January 2024, hoping that the next Taiwanese president will have a more friendly approach and possibly be amenable to reunification. It will, in all likelihood, be the last option for peaceful reunification.

Military Options​

Military options against Taiwan will be fraught with the risk of the US joining the war. China is not prepared for this eventuality.

Military option against India to resolve the border and Arunachal Pradesh issue is also extremely unlikely. China understands fully that it cannot win convincingly over India’s conventional forces. There is every possibility that China may have to retreat in the face of solid action by the IAF. As stated earlier, PLAAF operating from TAR cannot match IAF.

India’s Response​

India’s proactive response to Chinese misadventures in recent times has acted as a deterrent for China to attack Taiwan. If the USA, Japan, and India join together, China will have to rethink its option of striking Taiwan.

China cannot spread out its defense capability to neutralize all adversaries. Russia’s military support cannot (even if available) alter the script in favor of China.

China: Technology​

  1. Cyber
  2. International Space Station
  3. Unmanned reusable spacecraft
  4. Latest Super Computer
  5. Reusable Rockets. The private Chinese launch enterprise i-Space has successfully recycled a rocket just 38 days after its previous take-off.
  6. Chip Technology
Quoted above are the areas/domains where China has leapfrogged miles ahead of India because it invested in R&D and continues to do so. Chinese ‘soft threat’ in the field of Cyber Attacks is and will remain a formidable threat to India.

In space, China has taken a giant leap. I-Space, known as Beijing Interstellar Glory Space Company, is entering the export market with a possible connection with Elon Musk’s Space X. During a trial lift-off, a rocket using liquid/methane fuel rose to about 200 meters and returned safely for a vertical landing.

I-Space is developing a rocket named Hyperbola-3 by 2025, which will be capable of lifting around eight tons of payload in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and will be reusable.

Conclusion​

China will remain India’s main adversary (not enemy). It will keep the border issue with India alive to ensure that India is forced to spend vast amounts of money on security. The process impedes India’s growth in other areas.

However, China is unlikely to take a conventional military option against India, knowing it cannot win the war. Loss/stalemate will dent China’s stature globally, and its dream of becoming a numero uno superpower will be shattered.

China has to attend to far more pressing problems, namely Taiwan, the South China Sea, and an economic offensive against the USA.

Politically, China finds itself in a corner. Its growth has dwindled; real estate business has plummeted; the economic war against the USA did not favor China as presumed. Building new nuclear capability will merely add to the already existing deterrent.

Despite US preoccupation with Russia-Ukraine and Hamas-Israel war, its focus on China has not been lowered. The US is attempting to resolve issues with China through diplomacy.

The recent summit meeting between Biden and Xi was the first positive step towards normalizing the relations between the two countries. China, therefore, will wait and watch before embarking on any military option against India or Taiwan.

  • Gp Cpt TP Srivastava (Retd) is an ex-NDA who flew MiG-21 and 29. He is a qualified flying instructor. He commanded the MiG-21 squadron. He is a directing staff at DSSC Wellington and chief instructor at the College of Air Warfare. VIEWS PERSONAL OF THE AUTHOR
  • Follow EurAsian Times on Google News
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Tibet_Location_Nuclear_Arse.jpg


5f5ba885e6ff30001d4e8588


PLARF%20map.jpg


PLA-Rocket-Force-Map_Final-1024x798.jpg

 

jward

passin' thru
Global: Military-Info
@Global_Mil_Info

NORTH KOREA 12/18/23:
- South Korea and the United States are considering deploying additional U.S. strategic assets to/around the Korean peninsula and conducting "decapitation" drills. The decapitation drills would openly show a joint-strike exercise on North Korean leadership.
- Real-time North Korean ballistic missile warning data sharing system became operational between SK, U.S., and Japan.
- North Korea conducted a firing exercise with the Hwasong-18 solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile in response to the intensifying and dangerous situation arising on the Korean peninsula.
- Future offensive actions from North Korea will be more threatening and stronger per KJU.
- New important tasks to accelerate the development of the DPRK nuclear strategic force were identified and ordered by KJU.
View: https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1736910420584112272?s=20
 

jward

passin' thru
Global: Military-Info
@Global_Mil_Info
In response to North Korea redeploying weapons in the Joint Security Area, the United Nations Command has made the decision to rearm forces in the inter-Korean truce village of Panmunjom.
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News - Geo-Politics & Defense News
@IndoPac_Info
#Japan, #ASEAN bolster ties at summit focused on security amid #China tensions

Leaders from Japan and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, marking their 50th anniversary of friendship, were meeting at a special summit on Sunday and expected to adopt a joint vision that emphasizes security cooperation amid growing tensions with China in regional seas.

Ties between Japan and Asean used to be largely based on Japanese assistance to the developing economies, in part due to lingering bitterness over Japan’s wartime actions.

But in recent years the ties have focused more on security amid China’s growing assertiveness in the South China Sea, while Japan’s postwar pacifist stance and trust-building efforts have fostered friendlier relations.

“Based on our strong relationship of trust, it is our hope that Japan and Asean will bring together their strengths and find solutions in an era of compound crises that are difficult for any one country to solve,” Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said in a speech on Saturday night at the State Guest House in Tokyo.

“As we co-create and build upon stronger and more vibrant economies and societies, we will be better able to secure a free and open international order based on the rule of law,” he added.

Kishida proposed bolstering ties between Japan and Asean in security as well as in business, investment, climate, technology and people exchanges. Kishida and this year’s Asean chair, Indonesian President Joko Widodo, are set to announce a joint vision on Sunday after several sessions.

On Saturday, on the sidelines of the Dec. 16-18 summit, Kishida held a series of bilateral talks as Japan seeks to step up bilateral security ties with Asean countries.

Kishida and his Malaysian counterpart, Anwar Ibrahim, signed a 400 million yen ($2.8 million) deal to bolster Malaysia’s maritime security capability. It is a new Japanese official security assistance program specifically for militaries of friendly nations to help strengthen their law enforcement and security capabilities.

The assistance includes provisions of rescue boats and other equipment to help improve the military capability of Malaysia, which sits at a crucial location on sea lanes connecting the Indian Ocean and East Asia and serves a vital role in warning and surveillance operations for the entire region.

Separately on Saturday, Kishida signed a deal with Widodo, offering a grant of up to 9.05 billion yen ($63.7 million) to fund Indonesia’s maritime security capability advancement plan and includes a Japanese-built large-scale maritime patrol boat.

In November, Japan announced a provision of coastal surveillance radars to the Philippine navy, and the two sides also agreed to start talks for a key defense pact called the Reciprocal Access Agreement designed to smooth their troops’ entry into each other’s territory for joint military exercises.

Later that month, Japan and Vietnam agreed to elevate the status of their relationship to a top-level comprehensive strategic partnership, under which they will discuss details of a possible deal to broaden their defense cooperation.

But Asean countries are not in lockstep in their stance toward China, with which many have strong ties and are reluctant to choose sides. Japanese officials say they are mindful of the situation and not trying to get them to choose sides.

Japan also hopes to push forward energy cooperation with Asean leaders at a summit for the Asian Zero Emission Community initiative planned for Monday, when Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to join online.
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News - Geo-Politics & Defense News
@IndoPac_Info
F-15EX Fighters To Be Based At Kadena Air Base In #Japan: Report

A total of 36 F-15EX Eagle IIs could be poised to reinstate a permanent fighter force at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa.

The U.S. Air Force may be poised to return F-15 Eagles to Kadena Air Base on the Japanese island of Okinawa, in the form of the service’s new F-15EX Eagle II. In the past, some officials had already campaigned for the F-15EX to be deployed to Kadena — which currently has no permanent U.S.

Air Force fighter presence — although questions around the planned numbers of Eagle IIs to be bought had raised concerns about the viability of the idea.

Nikkei Asia, the Japan-based news magazine, reported today that the Pentagon is planning to permanently deploy 36 F-15EX fighters at Kadena. The source of this information is said to be unnamed “congressional sources,” who Nikkei Asia says were briefed on the plan.

A total of 36 fighters at Kadena would represent a reduction of 25 percent compared to when the base last hosted a permanent U.S. Air Force fighter presence — in the form of 48 F-15C/Ds.

Those Eagles were flown by the 44th Fighter Squadron (FS) “Vampires” and the 67th FS “Fighting Cocks,” but, as we reported at the time, in October 2022 the Air Force decided to retire these aging jets, which had been in service for nearly 40 years.

A Kadena Eagle Sunset Celebration, to mark the end of the F-15C/D’s 44-year tenure on Okinawa, took place in April this year.

Without the permanently based F-15C/Ds, the U.S. Air Force began sending F-35, F-22, and other fighters to Kadena as part of a rotational force. This, however, was widely consideredto be a temporary gap-filling measure until a long-term plan for future posture would be devised.

It seems that the future posture has now been determined and it will involve the first and likely only overseas presence involving the new F-15EX.

Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach, commander of the U.S. Pacific Air Forces, also confirmed to Nikkei Asia that the rotational fighter force was likely to give way to permanently based fighters.

“I would not expect us to go with rotational forces in perpetuity,” Wilsbach said, although he did not say when the permanently based fighters might arrive in Japan.

Wilsbach also said he considered that Kadena “is becoming even more important,” due to its strategic Asia-Pacific location.

This would allow for a more rapid response to contingencies in the region involving China, with Wilsbach seeing this proximity to a potential aggressor as an advantage, rather than a disadvantage.

The latter argument comes from China’s increasing ability to strike targets — especially airbases and other critical military infrastructure — at short notice and using a growing variety of advanced weapons.

“If they’re shooting weapons at us at Kadena, then we could be projecting power from Kadena Air Base,” Kadena postulated.

Furthermore, using the Agile Combat Employment(ACE) concept, which is now regularly trained, the F-15EX fleet based there would use Kadena as a point from which to relocate to other, more dispersed locations in the region.

That would be hoped to be enough to escape a first wave of Chinese missile strikes, for example.

In the past, Wilsbach had specifically said he’d like to see the F-15EX at Kadena.

“What we intend to use it for there, if we’re so fortunate to get that replacement, is air superiority and some long-range weapons capabilities that you can conduct on the F-15EX,” Wilsbach explained at a Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies event in March 2022.

There’s also a persuasive argument to be made that, despite the reduction in numbers, the basing of 36 F-15EX jets at Kadena would bring some notable advances over the previous 48 F-15C/Ds.

Not only does the Eagle II boast a much more capable avionics suite, electronic warfare capability, and expanded weapons carriage — as well as potentially new and longer-reaching weapons — but these newer jets would also bring reduced maintenance demands.

It's very likely they would provide a similar — or better — overall readiness end strength compared to the 48 aging F-15C/Ds that previous called Kadena home.

Regardless of the numbers involved, having any kind of permanent fighter presence at Kadena would also offer significant benefits. To start with, rotational deployments are typically smaller.

By their nature, they don’t provide regional commanders with a fixed total of assets that they know they can call upon at any time, nor do squadrons that only operate temporarily from a base have the same kind of know-how as regards the local operating environment.

Furthermore, with the Air Force already struggling to meet even peacetime commitments with a fast-shrinking fighter force, rotational deployments further eat into resources.

There’s also the considerable weight of messaging behind a permanent fighter presence, as opposed to a rotational one, to any potential foe.

When the decision was taken to remove the F-15C/D from Kadena, it was reported that officials in both the Japanese government and the Pentagon voiced their worry that the move would “send a dangerous signal to China about deterrence.”

Another Eagle-related effort that could bolster that messaging is the planned basing of up to 12 Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) F-15SG fighters at Andersen Air Force Base on the highly strategic island of Guam. While the Singaporean F-15s — broadly similar to the U.S. Air Force’s own Strike Eagles — would primarily be at Andersen to support RSAF training requirements, they would also have significant combat potential.

Andersen is another location over which there have been growing concerns over its vulnerability to enemy attack, especially from a peer state like China, something The War Zone has highlighted for years. But more recently there have been extensive efforts to expand and enhance its missile defense capabilities, in particular, as well as training to better survive an attack.

Adding RSAF Eagles to the island would further demonstrate resolve as well as a way of projecting additional airpower in the Asia-Pacific region.

Wilsbach also discussed another intriguing factor with Nikkei Asia, namely the forthcoming introduction of advanced uncrewed platforms that will work increasingly closely together with more traditional crewed fighters, employing high degrees of autonomy.

The U.S. Pacific Air Forces commander said that the Air Force was “absolutely” considering fielding its future Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) drones at Kadena. Supplementing a reduced-size fleet of F-15s would likely be an ideal role for these assets, each of which is planned to cost between a quarter and a third of the current price of an F-35 stealth fighter. The Air Force plans to buy at least a thousand of these advanced uncrewed aircraft.

In our story that broke the news that the F-15X (now EX) was in the works, we laid out how it would be an ideal platform for drone control. The EX's two-person cockpit, wide-area displays, networking, easy adaptability, and long range makes it an ideal candidate to make the most out of what loyal wingmen drones can offer.

Certainly, the potential for CCAs to be based at locations other than Kadena but then to work in close concert with the Okinawa F-15EX fleet would provide an enticing new capability which, as Wilsbach said, would “complicate the battlespace and create chaos for your adversary.” However, the introduction of CCAs is not expected to happen until the end of this decade.

For all its undoubted potential, there have long been questions about just how many F-15EX aircraft the U.S. Air Force will actually procure.

Back when the Air Force said it would only buy around 80 of the jets, The War Zone explored the many pitfalls of a truncated Eagle II purchase and also addressed the logic of bringing some of them to Kadena.

More recently, we returned to the topic, with the Air Force now planning to acquire 104 F-15EX aircraft, down from an originally planned minimum fleet size of at least 144.

It’s also worth noting that getting the F-15EX to Kadena might also take some time. So far, only a handful of the jets have been completed, for test work, with the first example for an operational unit, the 142nd Fighter Wing, not due to be delivered until early next year.

One of the takeaways from our most recent analysis was the question surrounding what the Air Force plans to do with roughly two squadrons’ worth of Eagle IIs, after allocating 18 jets to each of three Air National Guard units already earmarked for the type.

At the same time, at least some of the six test jets are likely to remain in that capacity and additional jets will be required to support the merged F-15E/EX training enterprise.

As we wrote back in September, reinforcing our original conclusions, “One option would be for the balance of the planned F-15EX acquisitions to head out to the Pacific to join Gen. Wilsbach’s PACAF.”

If this latest report turns out to be correct, then it looks like The War Zone’s prediction — and Wilsbach’s wish — of Eagle IIs bedding down at Kadena could well be about to come true.

Contact the author: thomas@thedrive.com

 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News - Geo-Politics & Defense News
@IndoPac_Info
#US sees no impact on #Vietnam ties from Hanoi-Beijing defence pledges

"There is always a distinction between Vietnam's diplomatic pronunciations and its actual security concerns."

The United States will continue to closely cooperate with Vietnam, a U.S. official said after Hanoi announced last week strengthened ties with China, including on defence and security, as the two great powers compete for influence.

Vietnam's leaders upgraded relations with Beijing during China's President Xi Jinping's visit to Hanoi last week, three months after they had boosted ties with Washington as Joe Biden travelled to the country in what has been seen as a success for Vietnam's "Bamboo diplomacy".

Despite language in a China-Vietnam statement that may be seen as directed against the United States, concerns that may hamper Washington's plans to deepen relations with Hanoi have so far been underplayed.

"Our relationship with Vietnam is not about any third country," said Cameron Thomas-Shah, spokesperson at the U.S. embassy in Hanoi.

"Our close cooperation with our Vietnamese partners across various sectors, including health, education, technology, and trade, will continue for the foreseeable future," he added in reply to Reuters questions.

Vietnam's foreign ministry did not reply to a request for comment.

In a joint declaration issued after Xi's visit, Vietnam and China committed to stronger security cooperation, including between defence industries and logistics.

The U.S. is also working to boost defence cooperation with Vietnam.

Carl Thayer, a senior expert in Vietnam security at the Australian Defence Force Academy in Canberra, said those "aspirational goals" with China were unlikely to affect defence cooperation with Washington.

Vietnam and China also agreed to enhance intelligence exchanges to prevent "hostile forces" from supporting grassroots movements such as those that led in recent years to revolutions in former Communist countries - which critics say were promoted by Washington.

"The emphasis on 'hostile forces' is not a surprise. China's leaders always whisper this in Vietnam's leaders' ears. But don't overstate the bilateral cooperation between them on this.

They won't be sharing intel," said Zachary Abuza, professor on Southeast Asian politics at the National War College in Washington DC.

"There is always a distinction between Vietnam's diplomatic pronunciations and its actual security concerns," said Raymond Powell, a former Air Attache to the U.S. embassy in Vietnam who currently leads Stanford University's Project Myoushu on the South China Sea.

He added: "Hanoi will continue to look for the safe ground between placating Beijing's political expectations and the threat China poses - particularly to its South China Sea position," where China and Vietnam have conflicting claims.

Reporting by Francesco Guarascio; Additional reporting by Khanh Vu; Editing by Christopher Cushing.
 

jward

passin' thru
Yonhap News Agency
@YonhapNews

(URGENT) N.K. leader vows to launch nuclear attack without hesitation in event of enemy's nuclear provocations
 

jward

passin' thru
Ben Lewis and VivaRevolt liked
Lara Seligman
@laraseligman

BREAKING: Gen. C.Q. Brown, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke to his Chinese counterpart Gen. Liu Zhenli on Thursday morning, ending a nearly year-and-a-half impasse between the two militaries.
 

jward

passin' thru
Lara Seligman
@laraseligman

The Pentagon is also planning to resume lower-level group engagements in “the short term,” specifically the annual Defense Policy Coordination talks that China canceled after Pelosi’s visit, and a round of the safety-focused Military Maritime Consultative Agreement dialogue:

7:49 AM · Dec 21, 2023
1,034
Views
 

jward

passin' thru
Next-Gen Interceptor Is Pentagon’s Only Option For Defeating Future North Korean ICBMs

Loren Thompson


NGI will supplement and replace existing defensive weapons such as this ground-based interceptor.
Defense.gov

On December 17 North Korea successfully tested an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching any point in America. It was the third such test this year.

U.S. policymakers have spent two decades neglecting this threat. With each nuclear advance that Pyongyang reports, doubts are voiced. Maybe nuclear devices are too big to put on a missile. Maybe they can’t survive the stresses of reentry. Maybe they won’t be accurate enough to hit targets.


The latest sign that much of official Washington doesn’t grasp the danger is a December 19 report by Jason Sherman of InsideDefense.com revealing that Pentagon budgeteers might cut the only program the Pentagon has for intercepting future North Korean ICBMs by 25% in next year’s budget.

Apparently planners think they can use the money saved to fund higher priorities.


These people need to wake up. There is no higher military priority, because no country is more likely to actually use nuclear weapons against America. North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un keeps declaring that he will do so if his regime is threatened.

A single 500-kiloton warhead airburst over Los Angeles would cause devastation in a circle measuring 12 miles across, killing millions and likely collapsing the domestic economy.


Experts estimate Pyongyang has enough nuclear material to build 20-60 nuclear warheads. Can engineers put them on long-range missiles? The Koreans say they can. If they can’t today, it is just a matter of time before they can.

On the same day Jason Sherman’s report appeared, Mary Beth Nikitin of the Congressional Research Service produced an updated report detailing all the steps North Korea is taking to build up its nuclear arsenal. It has conducted over 80 tests of tactical and strategic ballistic missiles in the last two years alone. It has tested nuclear devices six times since 2006, with steadily increasing explosive yields.


The country has even demonstrated the ability to launch ballistic missiles from submarines—meaning nuclear weapons might be secretly deployed only minutes away from their targets in the U.S.

All of that is bad enough, but U.S. intelligence agencies are warning that now the North Koreans are focusing on how to overcome the modest defenses that the Pentagon has deployed for intercepting such weapons.


Pyongyang has plenty of options. It could increase its inventory of long-range missiles, knowing that more than a dozen would likely overwhelm U.S. defenders (the Pentagon plans 64 interceptors, but might need up to four for each target).

Or they could put multiple warheads on each missile. Or they could make the warheads maneuverable. Or they could deploy penetration aids like decoys that confuse defenders.


You get the idea. Pyongyang has plenty of options if it chooses to spend the money. The Pentagon has only one option. It is called the Next Generation Interceptor, and it was conceived to counter likely advances in the threat.

That’s the program the Biden administration is contemplating using as a billpayer for other priorities.

The Next Generation Interceptor, or NGI, was launched after an earlier effort to make existing interceptors more effective faltered. In 2021, contracts were awarded to Lockheed Martin LMT +0.4% and a Northrop Grumman NOC +1.2%-RTX team to competitively develop designs capable of defeating the projected threat.


These three companies may be the only sources in the world capable of providing a robust solution to the danger. Lockheed and RTX contribute to my think tank.

If NGI progresses as planned, the Pentagon will purchase at least 20 interceptors equipped with multiple hit-to-kill warheads capable of smashing incoming targets to smithereens. The interceptors will rely on radar and other sensors operated by the military services to detect, track and sort out incoming weapons.


The new interceptors will be modular, fully digital, and capable of evolving with the threat. They won’t be cheap, but compared with the cost of even one North Korean nuclear warhead detonating on an America city, they will be a bargain.

Assuming the Biden administration goes forward with its proposed funding cut, competition will probably end in selection of a winning design next year, rather than 2025 as previously planned. If NGI gets fielded sooner, fine. But if it falters because of a premature down-select, that would be a disaster.


Congress should being paying attention. Nobody wants the fate of American civilization dependent on the addled thought process of a brutal, unpredictable dictator.

Disclosure: As noted above, Lockheed Martin and RTX contribute to my think tank, the Lexington Institute.


Next-Gen Interceptor Is Pentagon’s Only Option For Defeating Future North Korean ICBMs
 

jward

passin' thru
Indo-Pacific News - Geo-Politics & Defense News
@IndoPac_Info

'No Country in the World' Backs #China's Claims in #SouthChinaSea - The #Philippines - Newsweek China is alone in its belief that the Philippines is the instigator in the two countries' escalating South China Sea territorial feud, the Philippines' defense chief has said. "In truth and in fact, no country in the world—none—supports unequivocally their claim to the whole of the South China Sea," Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. remarked at the handover ceremony of a Japanese air surveillance radar system on Wednesday, per local news outlet ABS-CBN.

China claims dominion over most of most of the energy-rich waterway, despite an international tribunal's 2016 decision that these claims violated the Philippines' exclusive economic zone (EEZ) as defined by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. China has called on its Southeast Asian neighbor, a U.S. treaty ally, not to be a geopolitical pawn of Washington. Many nations have expressed support for the Philippines' right to resources within its exclusive economic zone and other areas under its territorial jurisdiction, Teodoro added, responding to a Chinese Foreign Ministry remark that the Southeast Asian country was entirely at fault for recent confrontations between the two countries. "The recent events between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea are caused by deliberate infringement of China's sovereignty and the provocations of the Philippines," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said when asked about Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos' characterization of the diplomatic relationship with the world's second-largest economy as moving "in a poor direction."

Your daily briefing of everything you need to know "The responsibility lies with the Philippines. We will resolutely protect our territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests," Wang said Tuesday. The statements come after rising tensions in the sea in recent weeks, including alleged "swarming" by China's maritime militia in the Philippines' EEZ and another round of collisions and near misses resulting from China's increasingly assertive blockades of supply missions to the Spratlys' Second Thomas Shoal and Scarborough Shoal. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan also have competing claims in the contested waterway. None, however, are pushing back as hard as the Philippines under the Marcos administration. The Marcos administration has been pursuing a "name and shame" policy of filming and bringing journalists aboard official resupply missions to contentious Philippine outposts in the Spratly Islands. Wang said the dispute does not define his country's relations with the Philippines and that Beijing hopes the latter will honor its alleged commitment to "properly handling disputes through dialogue and consultation and working to "jointly safeguard peace and stability in the region."

The Chinese embassy in the Philippines did not immediately respond to Newsweek's written request for comment. A number of countries, as well as the G7, responded to the latest confrontations with calls for respect for international maritime law in the South China Sea, with some blasting China's behavior as aggressive, illegal, and unsafe. The U.S. views the Philippines as its oldest ally in Asia. President Joe Biden and other administration officials have stressed the two countries' Mutual Defense Treaty is "ironclad," and an attack on Philippine assets anywhere, including the South China Sea, would trigger an American intervention. Japan, which has its own territorial dispute with China, has been seeking to shore up defense cooperation with the Philippines recently, including a proposed military-to-military mutual access program. "Japan also opposes any unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force, as well as any actions that increase tensions in the South China Sea," Japanese defense official Osamu Nishiwaki said at Wednesday's ceremony in San Fernando, La Union, per reports. https://newsweek.com/philippines-sa
View: https://twitter.com/IndoPac_Info/status/1738925220470354336?s=20
 

jward

passin' thru
well this isn't inflammatory eh

NK NEWS
@nknewsorg

ICYMI: Training for decapitation strikes to take out North Korean leader Kim Jong Un remains an “option” for South Korea’s military, defense minister Shin Won-sik said, as the U.S. and ROK kicked off joint special operations drills.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Next-Gen Interceptor Is Pentagon’s Only Option For Defeating Future North Korean ICBMs

Loren Thompson


NGI will supplement and replace existing defensive weapons such as this ground-based interceptor.
Defense.gov

On December 17 North Korea successfully tested an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching any point in America. It was the third such test this year.

U.S. policymakers have spent two decades neglecting this threat. With each nuclear advance that Pyongyang reports, doubts are voiced. Maybe nuclear devices are too big to put on a missile. Maybe they can’t survive the stresses of reentry. Maybe they won’t be accurate enough to hit targets.


The latest sign that much of official Washington doesn’t grasp the danger is a December 19 report by Jason Sherman of InsideDefense.com revealing that Pentagon budgeteers might cut the only program the Pentagon has for intercepting future North Korean ICBMs by 25% in next year’s budget.

Apparently planners think they can use the money saved to fund higher priorities.


These people need to wake up. There is no higher military priority, because no country is more likely to actually use nuclear weapons against America. North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un keeps declaring that he will do so if his regime is threatened.

A single 500-kiloton warhead airburst over Los Angeles would cause devastation in a circle measuring 12 miles across, killing millions and likely collapsing the domestic economy.


Experts estimate Pyongyang has enough nuclear material to build 20-60 nuclear warheads. Can engineers put them on long-range missiles? The Koreans say they can. If they can’t today, it is just a matter of time before they can.

On the same day Jason Sherman’s report appeared, Mary Beth Nikitin of the Congressional Research Service produced an updated report detailing all the steps North Korea is taking to build up its nuclear arsenal. It has conducted over 80 tests of tactical and strategic ballistic missiles in the last two years alone. It has tested nuclear devices six times since 2006, with steadily increasing explosive yields.


The country has even demonstrated the ability to launch ballistic missiles from submarines—meaning nuclear weapons might be secretly deployed only minutes away from their targets in the U.S.

All of that is bad enough, but U.S. intelligence agencies are warning that now the North Koreans are focusing on how to overcome the modest defenses that the Pentagon has deployed for intercepting such weapons.


Pyongyang has plenty of options. It could increase its inventory of long-range missiles, knowing that more than a dozen would likely overwhelm U.S. defenders (the Pentagon plans 64 interceptors, but might need up to four for each target).

Or they could put multiple warheads on each missile. Or they could make the warheads maneuverable. Or they could deploy penetration aids like decoys that confuse defenders.


You get the idea. Pyongyang has plenty of options if it chooses to spend the money. The Pentagon has only one option. It is called the Next Generation Interceptor, and it was conceived to counter likely advances in the threat.

That’s the program the Biden administration is contemplating using as a billpayer for other priorities.

The Next Generation Interceptor, or NGI, was launched after an earlier effort to make existing interceptors more effective faltered. In 2021, contracts were awarded to Lockheed Martin LMT +0.4% and a Northrop Grumman NOC +1.2%-RTX team to competitively develop designs capable of defeating the projected threat.


These three companies may be the only sources in the world capable of providing a robust solution to the danger. Lockheed and RTX contribute to my think tank.

If NGI progresses as planned, the Pentagon will purchase at least 20 interceptors equipped with multiple hit-to-kill warheads capable of smashing incoming targets to smithereens. The interceptors will rely on radar and other sensors operated by the military services to detect, track and sort out incoming weapons.


The new interceptors will be modular, fully digital, and capable of evolving with the threat. They won’t be cheap, but compared with the cost of even one North Korean nuclear warhead detonating on an America city, they will be a bargain.

Assuming the Biden administration goes forward with its proposed funding cut, competition will probably end in selection of a winning design next year, rather than 2025 as previously planned. If NGI gets fielded sooner, fine. But if it falters because of a premature down-select, that would be a disaster.


Congress should being paying attention. Nobody wants the fate of American civilization dependent on the addled thought process of a brutal, unpredictable dictator.

Disclosure: As noted above, Lockheed Martin and RTX contribute to my think tank, the Lexington Institute.


Next-Gen Interceptor Is Pentagon’s Only Option For Defeating Future North Korean ICBMs

Notice that no one is talking about "terminal" defense systems being deployed in CONUS like siloing already existing SM-3 with Aegis Ashore covering metro areas and the strategic forces.....
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.......

Hong Kong's pro-democracy Civic Party disbands after China cracks down on dissent​

Six lapel pins bearing the Civic Party's founding date are all Hong Kong veteran politician Alan Leong kept when the once-prominent opposition group cleared its headquarters and shuttered its doors days before the new year.

Issued on: 28/12/2023 - 03:31Modified: 28/12/2023 - 06:57
4 min

By:NEWS WIRES
ADVERTISING

Founded in 2006, the Civic Party – nicknamed "the barristers' party" – was made up of attorneys, academics and other professionals who wanted to promote democratisation in Hong Kong, becoming at one point the city's second-largest opposition party in the legislative council.

"Times have changed," co-founder Leong said, speaking to AFP in a series of interviews during the party's six-month shutdown process.

Since China imposed a sweeping national security law that quelled dissent after massive pro-democracy protests rocked Hong Kong in 2019, the Civic Party has seen three members jailed, its elected politicians unseated and a former lawmaker listed as a most wanted fugitive.

Under a leadership vacuum, the party decided to disband in May.

In the final months of 2023, it donated its office furniture and campaign loudspeakers, and stripped bare its walls of newspaper clippings and party signage.

But Leong held on to the green-and-purple pins bearing the date "19.03.06" – the party's birthday.

"What is left of the initial batch of the lapel pins would be all that we have," he told AFP.

The lawyer cited Hong Kong's "political reality" as well as a lack of money and morale as reasons for the party's closure.

"I have never doubted the ability of Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong, but there are things that are beyond our control," he said.

"There are a few of our legislators who are still behind bars now. So that's reality. That also explains why we are winding ourselves up."

'Raise our spirits'​

Once an electoral reform advocacy group, the Civic Party was formed by four lawyers who were also lawmakers – Ronny Tong, Margaret Ng, Audrey Eu and Leong.

Aspiring to become a "governing party", it recruited elites from different professions, such as civic engineer Albert Lai.

"It had then been a decade since Hong Kong's handover, but Beijing had not realised its promise of universal suffrage for the city... that was the triggering point of the party's formation," Lai told AFP.

Hong Kong was handed over from Britain to China in 1997, with Beijing promising a wide degree of freedoms and an "ultimate aim" of having the city's leader and lawmakers democratically elected.

But today, Hong Kong's chief executive is still chosen by Beijing loyalists.

And, in 2004, communist Beijing created more hurdles for electoral reform, fuelling an already simmering row over Hong Kong's "mini-constitution" – which governs the territory separately from mainland China – and bringing hundreds of thousands out to protest for greater democracy.

"Hong Kong's endurance has been tested to the limit," Ng wrote in the party's founding manifesto. "We must raise up our spirits again now."

In 2010, the party collaborated with its more radical peer – the League of Social Democrats – to trigger a by-election with the resignation of five pro-democracy legislators.

The parties said they aimed to create a symbolic referendum, allowing voters to show their support for democratisation, a move Beijing condemned as "unconstitutional".

Tong, a co-founder who defected from the party in 2015 to form his own group, said he was alarmed at the time by its "radicalisation".

"It was an act of confrontation," Tong, now a cabinet member, told a pro-government news outlet in June, "regretting" his part in creating the party.

'Patriots' only​

This year, Beijing's state television called the party an "anti-China destabilising organisation".

Seven Civic Party members have been prosecuted for leading pro-democracy protests, raising funds for demonstrators and joining an unofficial primary to shortlist legislative candidates – which Hong Kong's government alleges to be a national security crime.

By the end of 2021, all its members on the city's district and legislative councils had been ousted under Beijing's "patriots" doctrine in which anyone deemed politically disloyal is weeded out from Hong Kong public office.

Dennis Kwok, one of the Civic Party's unseated lawmakers who now lives overseas, is wanted for "collusion" and has a HK$1 million ($128,000) bounty on his head.

With the party's closure and his resignation as its leader, Leong said he was "relieved because I can actually put down the burden".

History is cyclical and no one can predict the city's future, he added.

But, he said: "Should there come a time that professionals or the like can once again serve Hong Kong... I am sure another party will be born."

(AFP)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use......

Chinese military irked by Indian naval ship’s drills with Philippines navy​

Expressing displeasure about the recent naval exercises conducted by the navies of India and the Philippines in the contested South China Sea, the Chinese military stated on Thursday that defense collaboration among nations should not jeopardize the interests of third parties or regional peace.

In response to a query from Chinese official media regarding naval drills between an Indian naval vessel and a Philippine naval vessel in addition to French plans to conduct air and naval drills with the Philippine Navy, Senior Col Wu Qian, spokesman for the Chinese Defence Ministry, stated that China has taken note of the reports.

China has always emphasized that defense and security cooperation between relevant countries must not harm the interests of third parties or hurt regional peace and stability, he said.

China is growing uneasy about the military collaboration between the Philippines and other nations, particularly as its coastguard ships have recently engaged in confrontations with Philippine navy vessels. These incidents are part of Beijing's efforts to assert control over areas in the disputed South China Sea, which are also claimed by Manila.

The Philippines Navy this month alleged that the Chinese ships used water cannons to attack its ships.

China claims most of the South China Sea. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan have counterclaims over the area.

Earlier this month, INS Kadmatt, while visiting the Philippines, took part in a maritime exercise in the South China Sea, collaborating with BRP Ramon Alcaraz, an offshore patrol vessel from the Philippine Navy.

Without directly referring to any country, Wu said the maritime dispute between China and the Philippines is an issue between Beijing and Manila, and no third party has the right to intervene.

According to him, China will continue to exercise extreme caution and will take all necessary steps to firmly protect its maritime rights and interests, national sovereignty, and security.

On the allegation that Chinese coastguard ships used water cannons against the Philippines vessels, Wu said it is purely false hype.

Despite multiple warnings from the Chinese side, the Philippines persisted in sending a vessel to intrude into areas claimed by both China and the Philippines. As a result, the Philippine vessel collided with a Chinese coastguard vessel, causing damage, according to the claim.

Such behaviour is very dangerous and extremely unprofessional. The China Coast Guard took necessary enforcement measures in accordance with law and were justified and legitimate, he said.

Regarding the U.S. criticism of Chinese coastguard actions against Philippine vessels and the mention of Washington's commitments under the Mutual Defense Treaty with Manila, Wu expressed China's strong dissatisfaction with such remarks and reiterated firm opposition. He emphasized that China maintains indisputable sovereignty over the areas claimed by Manila and accused the U.S. of encouraging the Philippines to provoke China.
 
Top