CORONA More deaths among vaccinated Americans not a reason to avoid vaccines, experts say

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
I am so confused...say, what???
---------------------------------------
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER
JAN 6

The lunacy of The Tampa Bay Times headline: "More deaths among vaccinated Americans not a reason to avoid vaccines, experts say"; can you grasp the lunacy of this title & even the reasoning when read​

PolitiFact | It actually underscores the importance of staying up-to-date on boosters​


SOURCE:

More deaths among vaccinated Americans not a reason to avoid vaccines, experts say

  1. NEWS
  2. /
  3. THE BUZZ ON FLORIDA POLITICS

More deaths among vaccinated Americans not a reason to avoid vaccines, experts say​

By
  • PolitiFact
Published Dec. 1, 2022 | Updated Dec. 8, 2022
A recent Washington Post headline about vaccinated Americans comprising the majority of COVID-19 deaths has been shared widely on social media to suggest that getting vaccinated is worthless.

“Vaccinated people now make up a majority of covid deaths,” read the headline of the Nov. 23 article. It has since been changed to read, “Covid is no longer mainly a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Here’s why.”

The article delves into the reasons why vaccinated people now make up a greater share of COVID-19 deaths. But the social media posts have shared only the headline, and not the article’s context. “Looks like your experimental jab was pointless,” read the caption on one Instagram post.

It is true that people vaccinated against COVID-19 now comprise the majority of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., but that’s been the case since April, and it is not a verdict on vaccine effectiveness, said Cynthia Cox, vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation. Cox conducted the analysis for The Washington Post, updating numbers that she and others had written about in April for Kaiser Family Foundation.

“It would be a misrepresentation of this finding to say it is evidence against vaccination. This finding actually underscores the importance of staying up-to-date on boosters,” Cox said.

She provided PolitiFact with the same data she shared with The Washington Post; it showed that in August, the last month of data available, 58% of deaths from COVID-19 were among vaccinated people (either with an initial two-dose regimen, or a booster), compared with 42% for unvaccinated people.

The latest figure for vaccinated people is down slightly from previous months — the data showed vaccinated people comprised 62% of the deaths in May and June.

Things have been heading in that direction for a while, with vaccinated Americans steadily making up a greater share of COVID-19 deaths, according to an article Cox co-authored for Kaiser Family Foundation in April.

One reason for the trend is that there are far more vaccinated people than unvaccinated. Also, vaccine effectiveness wanes over time, and low numbers of people have received updated booster shots, experts said.

More people are vaccinated than not​

Two years into the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, there are far more people vaccinated against the virus than unvaccinated, so it’s not unexpected that vaccinated people now make up the majority of hospitalizations or deaths.

“This does not mean the vaccines don’t work,” said Dr. Monica Gandhi, a professor of medicine at the University of California San Francisco.

“The truth is we always knew we would see a growing proportion of vaccinated individuals among our COVID admissions,” said Dr. Shira Doron, infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center. “If 100% of the population were vaccinated — and that is what we wished for — then 100% of COVID hospitalizations and deaths would be among the vaccinated.”

What’s more important is to consider whether the vaccine is preventing hospitalizations and deaths in vaccinated people versus the unvaccinated.

“When you look at the numbers that way, you see the vaccine is still very effective,” Doron said.

The latest data from the Centers for Disease Control shows that the death rate per 100,000 people among unvaccinated people was 1.32 on Sept. 25. By comparison, the rate for people vaccinated but without the updated bivalent booster is 0.26 per 100,000 people. And among those who have received the bivalent shot, it is 0.07 per 100,000 people.

That means people 12 and older who received the updated booster were 14.9 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people, the CDC said.

In addition, older Americans are more likely to be vaccinated than younger Americans, but are also at greater risk of dying from COVID-19.

The latest vaccine data from the CDC shows that 68.8% of all Americans have completed a primary series of vaccines. Among people over age 65, 93.8% have received at least a primary series.

“Vaccinated and boosted people, on average, are older and more likely to have underlying health conditions that put them at risk for severe COVID outcomes,” Cox said.

Another Washington Post analysis published this week shows nearly 9 out of 10 deaths from COVID-19 in the U.S. are now among people over age 65.

Waning protection, few boosters, natural immunity​

That’s only part of the story. Other factors affecting COVID deaths include waning vaccine protection, low numbers of people receiving updated boosters and natural immunity protection among the unvaccinated population, Cox said.

Studies have shown vaccine protection wanes, Cox said, which is “why it’s especially important for people at higher risk to stay up-to-date on boosters.”

But not many people have received the most recent bivalent booster, which targets the more prevalent omicron strain of COVID-19. Only 31.3% of people over age 65, the most vulnerable age group, have received the updated booster shot, CDC data shows. And among those ages 5 and older, only 12.1% of the population have received it.


Cox noted that many unvaccinated people have had COVID-19 at least once, and those who survived “may have gained some immune protection against the virus that can help protect them against severe outcomes when they have subsequent infections.”

Still, she said, hundreds of thousands of unvaccinated people “have needlessly died” from the virus.

U.S. deaths from COVID-19 have steadily decreased. There were more than 17,000 COVID-19 deaths in the week ending Feb. 2, compared with 2,644 the week ending Nov. 23. But COVID-19 is still on track to be the third-leading cause of death again this year, for the third year in a row, according to Kaiser Family Foundation.

“Bottom line: Vaccines save lives,” said Doron, from Tufts Medical Center, who said the number of deaths among the vaccinated “should not be used by anyone to support any agenda to the contrary.

Correction: This story was updated to note that people 12 and older who had received the bivalent booster were 14.9 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people.

-- BY JEFF CERCONE
 

Matt

Veteran Member
This is to keep the vaxxed calm until they drop..... if the mob ever figures out they are walking dead.... uncontrollable chaos

Read up on Temple Grandin... she designed the curved chute for slaughter houses... keeps the animals calm until they can be processed....
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This is to keep the vaxxed calm until they drop..... if the mob ever figures out they are walking dead.... uncontrollable chaos

Read up on Temple Grandin... she designed the curved chute for slaughter houses... keeps the animals calm until they can be processed....


I second the "Read up on Temple Grandin"; especially the techniques she developed for the Slaughter industry...

From Google:

"What is Temple Grandin most famous for?

Image result for Temple Grandin


Grandin invented a center track restrainer system that half the cattle slaughtered in the United States and Canada pass through. Her goal was to create a humane system, which she believed was critical to efficiency, because frightened animals do not go calmly to their fate. May 24, 2018"


Temple Grandin invented the technique used for cattle - but I've long wondered if there weren't some souless humans - Psychopaths/Sociopaths - who saw it and thought "Hey, I wonder if that would work for..."
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
I second the "Read up on Temple Grandin"; especially the techniques she developed for the Slaughter industry...

From Google:

"What is Temple Grandin most famous for?

Image result for Temple Grandin


Grandin invented a center track restrainer system that half the cattle slaughtered in the United States and Canada pass through. Her goal was to create a humane system, which she believed was critical to efficiency, because frightened animals do not go calmly to their fate. May 24, 2018"


Temple Grandin invented the technique used for cattle - but I've long wondered if there weren't some souless humans - Psychopaths/Sociopaths - who saw it and thought "Hey, I wonder if that would work for..."

Stressed animals release hormones that can make the meat taste nasty, she even said so herself.
 

EMICT

Veteran Member
Throughout history, there are multiple incidents where ‘purebloods’ died of polio, smallpox, measles, rubella, influenza, etc. I’m not sure pureblood is what people think it is. Better to say unvaxxed for Covid, but hell, why not take the ‘woke’ avenue of vocabulary.

Covid vax kills, but there are very few purebloods in the scheme of things… especially if anyone consumes modern pharmaceuticals… OTC and prescription.
 
Last edited:

TFergeson

Non Solum Simul Stare

WHO: Anti-Vaccine Activism Is Deadlier Than Global Terrorism​

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, JAN 06, 2023 - 09:29 AM

The World Health Organization shared a video on Twitter promoting the claim that anti-vaccine activism is deadlier than global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and gun violence.




Yes, really.

The video quoted Baylor College of Medicine’s Dr. Peter Hotez, who stated, “We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression, has now become a major killing force globally.”

Hotez went on to assert that 200,000 Americans died from COVID because they refused to get the vaccine, a claim that isn’t backed up by any source.

“And now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world, even into low and middle income countries,” added Hotez.

“Anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression, has now become a major killing force globally."
- @PeterHotez, Professor and Dean @BCM_TropMed, on the devastating impact of #misinformation and disinformation. pic.twitter.com/ZluiMGJ2gX
— World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) December 14, 2022
Once again with providing any source for his dubious claims, Hotez asserted that “anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks.”

The doctor went on to complain about how anti-vaccine skepticism had now become a “political movement” linked to “far-right extremism” in both the United States and Germany.

Hotez ominously called for “political solutions to address this.”

Unsurprisingly, respondents to the tweet completely savaged the WHO for sharing the video, with one pointing to stats that suggest, “Doctors and “medicine” kill more people than car accidents and guns.”

Doctors and “medicine” kill more people than car accidents and guns. YOU are killing people with “science” and dangerous untested drugs and vaccines. pic.twitter.com/sSGnxXNr8A
— Henrik Palmgren ᛟ (@Henrik_Palmgren) December 23, 2022
“The biggest anti-science dissemination has come from the @who when you tried to shut the world down over a mild virus with a 99.97% survival rate and for which even the most dire mortality rate was fraudulently reported (ie ‘positive test’). You only have yourselves to blame,” remarked another.

The biggest anti-science dissemination has come from the @who when you tried to shut the world down over a mild virus with a 99.97% survival rate and for which even the most dire mortality rate was fraudulently reported (ie ‘positive test’). You only have yourselves to blame.
— banthebbc (@banthebbc) December 18, 2022
“You are an absolute menace to society, Peter. Not just wrong in medicine. A menace to civilized society,” commented lawyer Viva Frei, posting screenshots of how Hotez has continually called for the masking and vaccination of children.

You are an absolute menace to society, Peter. Not just wrong in medicine. A menace to civilized society. pic.twitter.com/n99LlCwVrc
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) December 23, 2022
Despite his vehement enthusiasm for face coverings and vaccines, which he claimed stopped transmission of COVID, Hotez himself caught COVID in May last year and, of course, responded by thanking the vaccine.

Looks like I've tested positive for COVID, moderate symptoms of fatigue, headache, sore throat, isolating at home doing zoom meetings. I'm grateful to have been vaccinated/boosted, which certainly prevented more severe illness. Just started Paxlovid. Transmission up, be careful.
— Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD (@PeterHotez) May 9, 2022
Meanwhile, as we document in the video below, diehard advocates for the vaccine are now going full Jonestown with their rhetoric.

 

Matt

Veteran Member
How dumb is not the question..... you ever get those ridiculous fake sweepstakes flyers from the local used car dealers? They are ridiculous on purpose to keep the smart ones off the lot.... anyone who shows up with the flyer is an easy mark.... the ridiculous aspect is a filter to save time!

$100 gift card to stand in a parking lot awaiting your shot like a farm animal.....

Darwinian self selection..... it makes sense through that lens!
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Taken in isolation, the OP assertion is true. If everyone is jabbed, all the fatalities will be among the jabbed. That doesn't mean the jab is useless.

But looking at the whole picture, the jab renders the victim susceptible to many life-changing injuries and infections that would otherwise not be a problem. And it appears the morbidity associated with the jab far outweighs the morbidity of the WuFlu itself.

It's all in how you frame the PR.
 

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city

WHO: Anti-Vaccine Activism Is Deadlier Than Global Terrorism​

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, JAN 06, 2023 - 09:29 AM

The World Health Organization shared a video on Twitter promoting the claim that anti-vaccine activism is deadlier than global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and gun violence.




Yes, really.

The video quoted Baylor College of Medicine’s Dr. Peter Hotez, who stated, “We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression, has now become a major killing force globally.”

Hotez went on to assert that 200,000 Americans died from COVID because they refused to get the vaccine, a claim that isn’t backed up by any source.

“And now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world, even into low and middle income countries,” added Hotez.


Once again with providing any source for his dubious claims, Hotez asserted that “anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks.”

The doctor went on to complain about how anti-vaccine skepticism had now become a “political movement” linked to “far-right extremism” in both the United States and Germany.

Hotez ominously called for “political solutions to address this.”

Unsurprisingly, respondents to the tweet completely savaged the WHO for sharing the video, with one pointing to stats that suggest, “Doctors and “medicine” kill more people than car accidents and guns.”


“The biggest anti-science dissemination has come from the @who when you tried to shut the world down over a mild virus with a 99.97% survival rate and for which even the most dire mortality rate was fraudulently reported (ie ‘positive test’). You only have yourselves to blame,” remarked another.


“You are an absolute menace to society, Peter. Not just wrong in medicine. A menace to civilized society,” commented lawyer Viva Frei, posting screenshots of how Hotez has continually called for the masking and vaccination of children.


Despite his vehement enthusiasm for face coverings and vaccines, which he claimed stopped transmission of COVID, Hotez himself caught COVID in May last year and, of course, responded by thanking the vaccine.


Meanwhile, as we document in the video below, diehard advocates for the vaccine are now going full Jonestown with their rhetoric.

How ironic.

Wasn't it a prominent doctor / professor of medicine with Baylor University who was one of the first, and LOUDEST, voices speaking out on exactly WHY the vaccines were dangerous?

As I recall, he was going around the country giving speeches on it wherever he could--since social media and MSM very quickly de-platformed him, and Baylor distanced itself from him........
 
Hotez went on to assert that 200,000 Americans died from COVID because they refused to get the vaccine, a claim that isn’t backed up by any source.
Before the vaccine, a million died because they couldn’t get early treatment, which was known about and in use by March 2020.
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
Throughout history, there are multiple incidents where ‘purebloods’ died of polio, smallpox, measles, rubella, influenza, etc. I’m not sure pureblood is what people think it is. Better to say unvaxxed for Covid, but hell, why not take the ‘woke’ avenue of vocabulary.

Covid vax kills, but there are very few purebloods in the scheme of things… especially if anyone consumes modern pharmaceuticals… OTC and prescription.
"Pureblood" Doesn't refer to unvaccinated, which most people still are. The only vaccination for covid was the J and J which if I recall they have completely pulled now and was very limitedly available. I actually think it was just a camel nose under the tent to get more people to accept it because then they said later you had to be boosted with something other than J and J… in for a penny and for a pound.
Pure blood refers to the fact that many of us have refused to take the DNA altering MRNA clotshot. Not a vaccine a DNA editing vehicle. Clotshot.
 

EMICT

Veteran Member
"Pureblood" Doesn't refer to unvaccinated, which most people still are. The only vaccination for covid was the J and J which if I recall they have completely pulled now and was very limitedly available. I actually think it was just a camel nose under the tent to get more people to accept it because then they said later you had to be boosted with something other than J and J… in for a penny and for a pound.
Pure blood refers to the fact that many of us have refused to take the DNA altering MRNA clotshot. Not a vaccine a DNA editing vehicle. Clotshot.
Exactly, a 'woke' descriptor that is utilized to divide as opposed to unite those of us left with a quasi common cause (TB2K).
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Taken in isolation, the OP assertion is true. If everyone is jabbed, all the fatalities will be among the jabbed. That doesn't mean the jab is useless.

But looking at the whole picture, the jab renders the victim susceptible to many life-changing injuries and infections that would otherwise not be a problem. And it appears the morbidity associated with the jab far outweighs the morbidity of the WuFlu itself.

It's all in how you frame the PR.

Exactly. We discussed this on the main Covid thread when the study came out.

If 70% are vaxxed, and if the vaxx made no difference, you'd expect 70% of those in the hospital to be vaxxed. It's only 58% (at this point in time) so there is some protection for the vaxxed. Also discussed on the covid thread was that they didn't compare how many people who got vaxxed had a side effect from the vaxx to those who didn't take the vax. If you do that comparison of course the percentage of vaxxed has to be more because the unvaxxed have 0 (zero) % side effects from the vaxx since they didn't take it.

It's a risk benefit equation, always has been.

HD
 

LostMyMind

Contributing Member
I'm beyond sick and tired of the gaslighting village idiots.

I attended another funeral service this week. Friend goes to work the Monday after Christmas, passes out, rushed to the hospital, brain dead be the end of the day, passed away by Tues AM. Blood clot in his brain. Can they confirm it's the vax? Nope, but I've seen this storyline before.

I think that makes 7 or 8 in 18 months...I'm starting to lose count.
 

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
O
Oh, but didn’t you get the memo?

We are not supposed to call ourselves “purebloods” because it hurts the fragile feelings of those who took the jab...


(Of course, THEY were allowed to take our jobs away, exclude us from public concerts and other events, and even threaten us with jail time... and nobody cared how “we” felt...)
 

Signwatcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
The article states: That means people 12 and older who received the updated booster were 14.9 times less likely to die from COVID-19 than unvaccinated people, the CDC said.

What they didn't say was that people 12 and older who received the updated booster were 14.9 times likely or greater, to die of health issues CAUSED by the mRNA faucet of the so-called vaccine.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap

Sudden Death: The No. 1 Cause of Death for Under 65s in 2021​

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

STORY AT-A-GLANCE​

  • Mounting evidence shows the COVID shots are destroying people’s immune systems and are triggering turbo-charged cancers
  • A survey by Steve Kirsch found sudden death is the No. 1 cause of death among those under the age of 65 who got the COVID jab
  • Myocarditis as a cause of death is now registering across all age ranges but only for the vaccinated. Cardiac-related deaths are also significantly elevated among younger people (under 65) who got the jab compared to their unjabbed peers
  • Recent research shows repeated jabs trigger a switch in the types of antibodies your body produces and lower your ability to clear viruses. By switching from spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies to IgG4 antibodies, your body switches from tumor suppression mode into tumor progression mode
  • In addition to the potential for cancer cells to run amok, IgG4 dominance may also have severe autoimmune implications, as the COVID jab spike protein share similarities with human proteins
Evidence showing the COVID shots are a public health disaster keeps mounting. In late December 2022, Steve Kirsch1 and Jessica Rose,2 Ph.D., both published Substack articles detailing some of the latest evidence showing the shots are destroying people's immune systems and have triggered an avalanche of turbo-charged cancers.
Kirsch's article3 features results from a recent survey he conducted. It included four questions: age, whether the deceased was jabbed or not, year of death and cause of death. While the number of responses is low, major insights can still be gleaned by looking at the trends.
First, we have the baseline data from 2020, which show cancer was the No. 1 killer of Americans younger than 65, followed by hospital treatment for COVID. Turbo-charged cancers accounted for one-ninth of the cancer reports, and there were no reports of death from myocarditis.
Among seniors over the age of 65, preexisting conditions were the top cause of death in 2020. Cancer was second, COVID infection third and cardiac events fourth. There were no turbo-charged cancer deaths, nor any myocarditis deaths. Kirsch then gets into the differences between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed in 2021 and 2022.

What the Unvaxxed Died of in 2021 and 2022​

In 2021 and 2022, the primary cause of death for people 65 and younger was hospital treatment for COVID. Incidences of sudden death, pulmonary embolism and turbo-charged cancers were all low, and there were no unknown causes of death, nor any myocarditis deaths.

The same went for people older than 65. Hospital treatment for COVID was the No. 1 killer. Heart attacks, turbo-charged cancer and sudden death were all low, and there were no deaths from myocarditis.

What the COVID-Jabbed Died of in 2021 and 2022​

Among the COVID-jabbed aged 65 and younger, sudden death was the No. 1 cause of death in 2021 and 2022. The second was cardiac-related death and cancer was third. Importantly, the incidence of turbo-charged cancer among the jabbed was significant in this group, and myocarditis killed more than COVID-19.

Among those older than 65, cancer was the No. 1 cause of death, and the turbo-charged cancer rate is "huge compared to those without the vaccine." Sudden death was also significantly elevated.

Stark Difference in Cancer Deaths Between Jabbed and Unjabbed​

Kirsch summarizes the three most stunning differences between the jabbed and unjabbed:4

1."Sudden death rates are off the charts for the vaccinated cf. unvaccinated for those <65 ... It's the #1 cause of death for this age group ...
2.Myocarditis as a cause of death is registering now for both age ranges but only for the vaccinated ...
3.Cardiac issues as a cause of death in vaccinated young people (<65) are significantly elevated vs. their unvaxxed peers."


How COVID Jabs Raise Risk of Infections and Cancer​

Exploding cancer rates is precisely what you would expect from a drug that impairs and destroys your immune system, which is what the COVID jabs do. The scientific paper "Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations"5 describes how the COVID shots suppress your innate immune system by inhibiting the type-1 interferon pathway, which is the first-stage response to all viral infections.

The reason type-1 interferon is suppressed is because it responds to viral RNA, and there's no viral RNA in the COVID shot. The RNA is modified to look like human RNA, so the interferon pathway doesn't get triggered. As a result, the COVID jab makes you more susceptible to infections.

One mechanism by which the jab causes cancer has to do with the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes,6 a type of white blood cell that helps your body fight infections and chronic diseases such as cancer. That's bad enough, yet that's just one mechanism of many.

How the Jab Lowers Your Viral Clearance Capacity​

Recent research7,8 also shows that repeated jabs trigger a switch in the types of antibodies your body produces and lower your ability to clear viruses. Jessica Rose reviews these findings in her Substack article:9

"A paper was published in Science Immunology on December 22, 2022 entitled: 'Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination'10 ...
[It] explains in wonderful detail how a class of antibody that commands a non-inflammatory response (more like tolerizing) is prominent in people who have been repeatedly injected with the modified mRNA COVID-19 injectable products.
Translation: Instead of the intended pool of spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies being dominant in multiply-injected people, a pool of antibodies associated with spike-specific tolerance are dominant in multiply-injected people.
Besides the tolerizing capacity, they also showed that the phagocytic enabling capacities were much reduced overall. These activities lead to clearance of viral pathogens. Reduce them → reduction in viral clearance capacity ...
To be clear, this wasn't a 'maybe the antibody profile was a little different' ... This was a 'whoa there's a 48,075% increase in spike-specific antibodies between the 2nd and 3rd injections ...
IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose on average from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% after the third ... mportantly, that is not a typical consequence of repeat antigen exposure from either natural infections and vaccination."

Spike Overexposure Also Opens the Door for Cancer​

As noted by Substack author Brian Mowrey:11

"This is a totally bonkers thing for an anti-spike-protein B cell to decide to do, and reflects B cell over-exposure to spike, which reflects super-excess production of spike by the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA code ...
It is not normal to make IgG4 when repeat encounter with a virus is spaced out over a lifetime, but injection-prompted antigen exposure promotes this response, and mRNA vaccines accelerate this effect ...
There is no reason to predict that this would be 'good' in an antiviral response ... 'Wearing out' the immune response in this way is believed to contribute to the development of tolerance against tumors."
So, to summarize the effects in layman's terms, the switch from spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies to IgG4 antibodies switches your body from tumor suppression mode into tumor progression mode, as cancerous cells now can evade your immune system. You become "tumor tolerant" as your immune system is no longer scavenging for and eliminating cancer cells. Mowrey also points out that:12

"Once a B cell has switched to IgG4, it cannot switch to any other IgG subclass, as the genes for all those other base designs have been discarded. All future clones of this B cell will code for IgG4 receptor/antibody for the antigen in question."

What Other Health Effects May Result?​

For clarification, IgG4 is a subclass of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody type that responds to repeated and/or long-term exposure to an antigen. The mRNA shot evaluated here was that of Pfizer, and it was compared against Janssen's viral vector-based shot. Moderna's shot was not included. Notably, these results were not found among people who got Janssen's shot, only Pfizer's Comirnaty jab.

Continued here:

 
Top