LEGAL Statement from President Joe Biden on Averting a Rail Shutdown

Wyominglarry

Veteran Member
A friend works for the RR and he says the work schedule is what everyone is really upset about. He said no one wants to work for the RRs anymore, so the remaining employees have terrible on call 24/7 schedule. He said he cannot plan on any vacation, has no time to spend with his family, and is constantly exhausted from working non stop. He said the money is good, and good benefits if you can ever use them. He wants to strike and just watch the country fall apart. Perhaps then the RR owners, like Buffet, will realize they can no longer push their employees to the breaking point. Yes, he knows if he gets time off the deliveries will slow down, but at this point he no longer cares.
 

jward

passin' thru



The White House



November 30, 2022

Statement from President Joe Biden on House Action to Avert Rail Shutdown​


I am grateful to Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats and Republicans for taking urgent action to prevent a rail shutdown. This overwhelming bipartisan vote in the House of Representatives makes clear that Democrats and Republicans agree that a rail shutdown would be devastating to our economy and families across the country. The Senate must now act urgently. Without the certainty of a final vote to avoid a shutdown this week, railroads will begin to halt the movement of critical materials like chemicals to clean our drinking water as soon as this weekend. Let me say that again: without action this week, disruptions to our auto supply chains, our ability to move food to tables, and our ability to remove hazardous waste from gasoline refineries will begin. The Senate must move quickly and send a bill to my desk for my signature immediately.
 

jward

passin' thru

House passes legislation to avert a rail shutdown​


Kristin Wilson, Paul LeBlanc, Clare Foran

7-8 minutes



Washington CNN —

The House on Wednesday approved legislation to avert a rail shutdown following a grave warning from President Joe Biden about the economic danger posed by congressional inaction.

By a 290 to 137 vote, the House passed the tentative rail agreement that will prevent a rail strike. The vote was largely bipartisan, with 79 Republicans joining Democrats in voting for the bill. Eight Democrats voted against the bill.

In a separate vote, the House also voted 221 to 207 to add a provision to the rail agreement that would increase the number of paid sick days from one to seven. The bill was passed largely down party lines, with just three Republicans, including John Katko of New York, and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania crossing over to vote with Democrats on that measure.

Without congressional action, a rail strike could become a reality as early as December 9, causing shortages, spiking prices and halting factory production. It could also disrupt commuter rail services for up to seven million travelers a day and the transportation of 6,300 carloads of food and farm products a day, among other items, according to a collection of business groups.

The additional sick leave provision was added at the insistence of progressive members of the House who had threatened to scuttle the rail agreement bill if sick leave wasn’t included. However, it was added using an arcane tactic that will enable the Senate to pass the original rail agreement without including the sick leave provision.

The bill now heads over to the Senate where it is unclear whether there is support for that provision. The strategy of holding two different votes could give Democrats cover with the left without jeopardizing passage of the bill in the Senate.

Senate leaders are now trying to see if they can reach a deal to pass the rail legislation as soon as Wednesday night, according to two Senate sources, but they would need all 100 senators to agree to schedule that vote. Any one senator can object and drag out the process.

A freight rail strike could cost the US economy $1 billion in its first week alone, according to a new analysis from the Anderson Economic Group.

As a result, Biden had pushed Congress to “immediately” pass the legislation to avert a shutdown.

Calling himself a “proud pro-labor President,” Biden said in his Monday statement, “I am reluctant to override the ratification procedures and the views of those who voted against the agreement. But in this case – where the economic impact of a shutdown would hurt millions of other working people and families – I believe Congress must use its powers to adopt this deal.”

A rail shutdown, Biden warned, would “devastate the economy.”

Even as 79 House Republicans voted for the rail deal, House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy voted against it.

Asked why, McCarthy blamed President Biden.

“First Biden told us that inflation was transitory, it wasn’t,” he told CNN. “He told us immigration was seasonal and it wasn’t. He told us Afghanistan wouldn’t collapse to the Taliban. Then he told us in September that this deal was all worked out. Now he wants the government to go into this? I just think it’s another - it’s another sign of why the economy is weak under this Biden administration.”

Pressed over the fact that if his position won, it would have led to a strike, McCarthy pushed back.

“If my position held out we’d actually have it done by the private sector a long time ago and we’d have efficiency. We wouldn’t have inflation, we’d have a secure border.”

There is now a push to get the bill done by Wednesday since senators typically leave for the weekend on Thursdays and given concerns that the impact of a potential strike could be felt as soon as this week.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, has indicated he wouldn’t allow a vote to occur unless the Senate gives him a vote on his amendment to mandate seven days of paid sick leave for rail workers.

Asked if he would agree to let the Senate vote on the deal Thursday if he gets a vote on his amendment, Sanders told CNN: “We will see.”

Republicans, in the meantime, have not yet requested any amendment votes, according to Sen. John Thune, the Republican whip.

“I don’t think we want to get into the weeds with details and agreements,” Thune said.

Still Thune later told CNN that Republicans are unlikely to agree to a final vote tonight on passage of the railway bill but said that it’s still possible final votes could occur on Thursday.

‘I expect there will be objections to doing it that way,” Thune said when asked about a Wednesday night vote. “We got people in all kinds of different places on this,” referring to GOP senators.

Some conservative critics of the plan even conceded a vote on final passage could occur Thursday.

“I think that’s certainly a possibility that we see a vote tomorrow,” said Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican.

Several Republican senators said Tuesday they are still weighing whether to back the legislation. Some said they are worried about what might be included in the final version of the legislation.

“We’re going to have look at the particulars of whatever bill might come before us,” said Indiana Republican Sen. Todd Young. “I haven’t seen the legislation.”

Alaska Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, meanwhile, said he had “to get up to speed” on the issues before deciding. “I’m usually someone who supports the working man on a whole host of issues, but I don’t have a lot of knowledge on the details yet,” he said.

And Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican of Missouri, also refused to state his position, and pointed to divisions across the aisle. “My understanding is my Democratic friends don’t agree on what needs to be done, so let’s see what happens,” he said.

One member of the GOP leadership, Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska, warned a rail strike would be “devastating” to the economy and would “hurt people.” She said she expects to back the bill.

“I think it’s important to see what comes over from the House, and I anticipate I will be voting in in favor of it,” she said. “We do not need to see a strike happen that could have such negative impacts on families.”

This story and headline have been updated with additional developments Wednesday.

CNN’s Chandelis Duster, Ted Barrett, Manu Raju, Allie Malloy, Daniella Diaz and Annie Grayer contributed to this report.
House passes legislation to avert a rail shutdown | CNN Politics
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
The strategy of holding two different votes could give Democrats cover with the left without jeopardizing passage of the bill in the Senate.
Could be that's what they really wanted. There are indications the PTB want the strike.
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
If a railroad strike does occur, perhaps some of what goes on
can be heard on a scanner.

I have been checking railroad frequencies on Radio Reference,
and there are a lot, usually based on where the train starts from.

Is there anyone here, who monitors the railroad radio traffic,
and what frequencies are in use?

I have a APCO 25 trunk tracking scanner, computer programmable.

Please be safe everyone.

Regards to all.

Nowski
I've got my own Radio that was issued to me......
 

Cedar Lake

Connecticut Yankee
In any case, if all the railroad workers simply refused to go to work, the way most of the air traffic controllers did; then yes, they can legally fire all of them but there is NO ONE to take their place.
You can't just call out the military to "make the trains run on time," and if they tried it there would still be MONTHS TO YEARS of the shutdown while service men and women were trained to do unfamiliar jobs.
ARMY RESERVE has 75 trained RR men and women on hand nationwide.
It takes 15 weeks, (About 4 Months) to train each new service person.........
Sometimes you have to face the cold, hard truth and say, why can't the union RR employees have some paid sick-time off just like the airlines & other major companies?
Is Congress even aware that the union RR employees get no paid sick-time at all in the year 2022?
How much paid sick-time does RR management get?
Major companies without any paid sick-time for essential employees in 2022, it just does'nt make any fiscal sense at all.
 

raven

TB Fanatic
ARMY RESERVE has 75 trained RR men and women on hand nationwide.
It takes 15 weeks, (About 4 Months) to train each new service person.........
Sometimes you have to face the cold, hard truth and say, why can't the union RR employees have some paid sick-time off just like the airlines & other major companies?
Is Congress even aware that the union RR employees get no paid sick-time at all in the year 2022?
How much paid sick-time does RR management get?
Major companies without any paid sick-time for essential employees in 2022, it just does'nt make any fiscal sense at all.
Congress believes a man can become a woman and get pregnant . . .
I think you are asking way to much of them
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
A friend works for the RR and he says the work schedule is what everyone is really upset about. He said no one wants to work for the RRs anymore, so the remaining employees have terrible on call 24/7 schedule. He said he cannot plan on any vacation, has no time to spend with his family, and is constantly exhausted from working non stop. He said the money is good, and good benefits if you can ever use them. He wants to strike and just watch the country fall apart. Perhaps then the RR owners, like Buffet, will realize they can no longer push their employees to the breaking point. Yes, he knows if he gets time off the deliveries will slow down, but at this point he no longer cares.
I've only worked for them 3 months and that's how I feel already...
 

Cedar Lake

Connecticut Yankee
Maybe they could take some of the Air Marshals and extra IRS Agents and have them driving trains and . . . stuff
Yeah baby, all 86,000 office workers outside driving track spikes, splicing rail & stuff during the winter, oops, the metal rail shrunk 3 feet.
 

Nich1

Veteran Member
According to a representative from the RR being interviewed on Warroom tonight, the strike has not been averted. His words about what the White House said..."not true." The unions are trying to reach senators to describe their situation to them and ask for them to stand for the workers.

From the report this guy gave, working for the RR would not be pleasant. They are expected to go to work even if sick. If they do not go, they are written up. After a certain number of write ups, they are disciplined.

He also explained that the reason for not allowing anyone to miss work is because the RR is working on only minimal workers. If someone would be out, it is quite a problem. I'm not sure what they do. They want to remove ALL personnel from the trains and run them by computer only! Even so, now there are only 2 people as it is! Seems like I've seen a movie with a similar plot when the computer went berserk and it was only because of "the hero" that the train got stopped before a disaster! He even mentioned the potential for a train to be going through Chicago with chlorine tanks on it and no person on the train!

Average wage of RR workers, according to him, is $31/hour. Just to take a lawn mower to the shop is $85/hr! And, they don't work outside! It appears the RR overall is in trouble. Perhaps it was the goal of the gov. to run it into the ground to nationalize? Pity.
 

Cedar Lake

Connecticut Yankee
According to a representative from the RR being interviewed on Warroom tonight, the strike has not been averted. His words about what the White House said..."not true." The unions are trying to reach senators to describe their situation to them and ask for them to stand for the workers.

From the report this guy gave, working for the RR would not be pleasant. They are expected to go to work even if sick. If they do not go, they are written up. After a certain number of write ups, they are disciplined.
After a certain number of write ups, they are disciplined.

Yeah, the disciplined worker is given unpaid time off.
 

Craftypatches

Veteran Member
According to a representative from the RR being interviewed on Warroom tonight, the strike has not been averted. His words about what the White House said..."not true." The unions are trying to reach senators to describe their situation to them and ask for them to stand for the workers.

From the report this guy gave, working for the RR would not be pleasant. They are expected to go to work even if sick. If they do not go, they are written up. After a certain number of write ups, they are disciplined.

He also explained that the reason for not allowing anyone to miss work is because the RR is working on only minimal workers. If someone would be out, it is quite a problem. I'm not sure what they do. They want to remove ALL personnel from the trains and run them by computer only! Even so, now there are only 2 people as it is! Seems like I've seen a movie with a similar plot when the computer went berserk and it was only because of "the hero" that the train got stopped before a disaster! He even mentioned the potential for a train to be going through Chicago with chlorine tanks on it and no person on the train!

Average wage of RR workers, according to him, is $31/hour. Just to take a lawn mower to the shop is $85/hr! And, they don't work outside! It appears the RR overall is in trouble. Perhaps it was the goal of the gov. to run it into the ground to nationalize? Pity.
Such a sad time for the railroad. They can send all that money to Ukraine plus some on the side for themselves yet not take care of our workers in the US. Also take care of the illegal aliens, nothing is as it should be anymore. Part of a successful company is morale. Of course if they want things to run by computer why should they care. Greed will be the end of our country.
 

Matt

Veteran Member
A point to consider... these railroad employees have been making a decent wage, working massive amounts of overtime and had minimal time to spend said pay....

Pretty good odds that a big chunk of that workforce has enough coin set aside to take a year or two off....

kind of the same mind set I had as an oil and gas employee being faced with losing my job over the vaxx....

phuck you, a sabbatical sounds good and I'll see how things shake out in a year.... somebody will eventually hire me as I have a pretty strong resume in a specialized field!
 

Hognutz

Has No Life - Lives on TB
A point to consider... these railroad employees have been making a decent wage, working massive amounts of overtime and had minimal time to spend said pay....

Pretty good odds that a big chunk of that workforce has enough coin set aside to take a year or two off....

kind of the same mind set I had as an oil and gas employee being faced with losing my job over the vaxx....

phuck you, a sabbatical sounds good and I'll see how things shake out in a year.... somebody will eventually hire me as I have a pretty strong resume in a specialized field!
I'm seriously thinking about going back to my mechanical maintenance profession in a mill...
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Want to throw my 2 cents in...it should be 6 now, with inflation...anyway, wanted to add this article. I feel that tptb set this up over time, and they set it up for their bad agenda. Yes, Buffett is a globalist. Who owns the other rrs? Doesn't matter, the cabal is controlling many puppet strings. Dang clowns and puppets, this is a sh** show!

1669852943479.png

House Votes to Avert Rail Strike, Impose Deal on Unions​

November 30, 2022

(AP) The U.S. House moved urgently to head off the looming nationwide rail strike on Wednesday, passing a bill that would bind companies and workers to a proposed settlement that was reached in September but rejected by some of the 12 unions involved.

The measure passed by a vote of 290-137 and now heads to the Senate. If approved there, it will be quickly signed by President Joe Biden, who requested the action.

Biden on Monday asked Congress to intervene and avert the rail stoppage that could strike a devastating blow to the nation’s fragile economy by disrupting the transportation of fuel, food and other critical goods. Business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Farm Bureau Federation warned that halting rail service would cause a $2 billion per day hit to the economy.

The bill would impose a compromise labor agreement brokered by the Biden administration that was ultimately voted down by four of the 12 unions representing more than 100,000 employees at large freight rail carriers. The unions have threatened to strike if an agreement can’t be reached before a Dec. 9 deadline.


Lawmakers from both parties expressed reservations about overriding the negotiations. And the intervention was particularly difficult for Democratic lawmakers who have traditionally sought to align themselves with the politically powerful labor unions that criticized Biden’s move to intervene in the contract dispute and block a strike.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to that concern by adding a second vote Wednesday that would add seven days of paid sick leave per year for rail workers covered under the agreement. However, it will take effect only if the Senate goes along and passes both measures.

The call for more paid sick leave was a major sticking point in the talks. The railroads say the unions have agreed in negotiations over the decades to forgo paid sick time in favor of higher wages and strong short-term disability benefits.

The head of the Association of American Railroads trade group said Tuesday that railroads would consider adding paid sick time in the future, but said that change should wait for a new round of negotiations instead of being added now, near the end of three years of contract talks.


The unions maintain that railroads can easily afford to add paid sick time at a time when they are recording record profits. Several of the big railroads involved in these contract talks reported more than $1 billion profit in the third quarter.

“Quite frankly, the fact that paid leave is not part of the final agreement between railroads and labor is, in my opinion, obscene,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. “It should be there and I hope it will be there at the end of this process.”

Republicans also voiced support for the measure to block the strike, but criticized the Biden administration for turning to Congress to “step in to fix the mess.”

“They’ve retreated in failure and they kicked this problem to Congress for us to decide,” said Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo.

Republicans also criticized Pelosi’s decision to add the sick leave second bill to the mix. They said the Biden administration’s own special board of arbitrators recommended higher wages to compensate the unions for not including sick time in its recommendations.

“Why do we even have the system set up the way it is if Congress is going to come in and make changes to all of the recommendations?” Graves said.

Pelosi sought to position Democrats and the Biden administration as defenders of unions and slammed the rail companies, saying they’ve slashed jobs, increased worker hours and cut corners on safety. But she said Congress needed to intervene.

“Families wouldn’t be able to buy groceries or life-saving medications because it would be even more expensive and perishable goods would spoil before reaching shelves,” Pelosi said.

The compromise agreement that was supported by the railroads and a majority of the unions provides for 24% raises and $5,000 in bonuses retroactive to 2020 along with one additional paid leave day. The raises would be the biggest rail workers have received in more than four decades. Workers would have to pay a larger share of their health insurance costs, but their premiums would be capped at 15% of the total cost of the insurance plan. The agreement did not resolve workers’ concerns about schedules that make it hard to take a day off and the lack of more paid sick time.

The Biden administration issued a statement in support of Congress passing the bill that implements the most recent tentative agreement, stressing that it would provide improved health care benefits and a historic pay raise. But the statement was silent on the measure that would add seven sick days to the agreement.

“To be clear, it is the policy of the United States to encourage collective bargaining, and the administration is reluctant to override union ratification procedures and the views of those union members who voted against the agreement,” the White House said. “But in this case – where the societal and economic impacts of a shutdown would hurt millions of other working people and families – Congress must use its powers to resolve this impasse.”

On several past occasions, Congress has intervened in labor disputes by enacting legislation to delay or prohibit railway and airline strikes.

 

jward

passin' thru

Senate reaches deal to stop rail strike; Biden admin lobbied against sick-leave bill​


Ed Morrissey

5–6 minutes



Looks like the US will avoid a strike by rail workers. It also looks like the Senate deal tossed Joe Biden’s union allies under a bus — with most of the tossing done by the White House.
Within the last hour, Chuck Schumer announced an agreement in the Senate on the first House bill to impose the deal quarterbacked by Biden onto both sides. The Senate agreement got facilitated, according to Politico’s Burgess Everett, by Biden’s White House — which told the Senate not to attempt to amend the deal:
Administration also told Senate Democrats the fight for more sick leave isn’t over but the only option to avoid rail shutdown was to pass agreement, per senators
— Burgess Everett (@burgessev) December 1, 2022
Biden himself addressed the issue somewhat obliquely this afternoon as well. In a joint presser with French president Emmanuel Macron, Biden pledged to keep working to get paid sick days into the national contract. It won’t be this time, however, he conceded. As Bloomberg’s Jordan Fabian also reported, Biden tried to buffer the blowback by reminding unions what he accomplished for them in this round of bargaining — but, er, um …
Biden, in his answer, said the tentative agreement he helped broker with union leaders and railroads in Sept, which was rejected and now Congress is voting to impose, provided a 43 or 45% pay increase for workers. It is actually 24%, with an ~avg of $11K in back pay bonuses
— Jordan Fabian (@Jordanfabian) December 1, 2022
Is Biden lying about what he got, or does he just not know? Embrace the power of and rather than or in these cases.
With that out of the way — presumably, anyway — Schumer now has a sequence of votes in store for the upper chamber, which had already commenced before this post went live. First up will be a proposal to impose another 60-day cooling-off period that would require all sides to restart negotiations, which is both the most rational option and the least likely to pass. After that, comes the meat and potatoes:
The first vote is an amendment by Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, that would extend the “cooling off period” giving the relevant parties an extra 60 days beyond the Dec. 8 deadline to keep negotiating an agreement between unions and rail operators.
Then, the Senate will vote on an amendment, championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Democrats to include seven days of paid sick leave for rail workers as part of the agreement.
And finally, the Senate will vote to impose the tentative agreement from September to avert a strike — this is legislation that has already been passed by the House and would head to the president’s desk if approved by the Senate. It was brokered by the White House but not all the unions involved support it.
Each of these will take 60 votes to clear if Senate rules on expedited floor votes are followed. The Sullivan amendment might not even get to 50, given the other agreements apparently in place. [Update: It failed, 26-69.] Neither might the sick-day addition bill, although that might have come close without the Biden White House lobbying against it.
Then, with those poses sufficiently taken for posterity, we can expect a pretty lopsided vote for passage on imposing the previously negotiated deal. I’d guess that will get at least 75 votes, as few senators will want to be seen as voting for a crippling rail strike, but count Sanders especially among the likely objectors. Marco Rubio might stick to his guns too, but the sequence here is designed to give everyone else who demanded the addition of the sick days some political cover for voting to pass the final bill. Hey, I voted to add the sick days, they can claim … and will.

Stay tuned for updates, but we can probably bet on a bill ready for Biden’s signature on his terms, explicitly so in fact, by tomorrow morning. Rail workers will have to go back to work and look for better negotiators the next time the contract approaches its end. They may want to look for better allies, too.
Update: What version of The Matrix produced this moment?
After Cruz voted for the amendment to mandate seven days of paid sick leave for rail workers, he walked over and gave Bernie Sanders a fist bump. Vote is ongoing
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) December 1, 2022
So far, five Republicans have voted for the sick-day addition. Bernie would need 11, with Manchin out.
Update: It’s taking forever for the Senate to close out the vote on the paid sick-leave bill from the House, but it’s failed with 43 nays. Because this is considered under expedited rules, it takes 60 votes to pass on the floor. Next up will be the core bill that imposes the negotiated deal.

 

jward

passin' thru
AFP News Agency
@AFP
4m

Official
#BREAKING US Congress approves bill to avert freight rail strike
 

desert_fox

Threadkiller
I was discussing the strike with the manager of a grain facility at one of my inspections today. His observation was that during the spring/summer the railroads were 3 months behind on shipping (remember the DEF threats!) and this mysteriously disappeared because markets adjusted for it. The markets adjusted their schedule to basically "absorb" the difference in wait times. He also noted during that time he rejected a lot of railcars due to broken or missing parts that it became a game to see how many he had to reject.

I could see railroad workers slowing down the shipping times on purpose after being told to shut up and go stand in the corner from their managers and from Uncle Sam. This would cause a snarl in the system once again, and I am not sure the markets will "adjust" as easily this time.
 

jward

passin' thru
Spencer Brown
@itsSpencerBrown


Congress bailed Biden out of another of his botched attempts at leadership on Thursday when the Senate passed a bill (one day after the House did) to avert a nationwide rail strike by imposing a contract on workers that union members had rejected.
 

jward

passin' thru
townhall.com
'Should Never Have Come to This': Congress Passes Bill to Avert Rail Strike
Spencer Brown
4–5 minutes

The United States Senate passed a bill on Thursday to avert a nationwide railroad strike that was set to cost the American economy $2 billion per day and bring a major piece of America's transportation system to a halt after the House passed its version of the legislation on Wednesday. The final bills that were passed impose the tentative agreement that was reached by labor leaders and rail companies with the "help" of the Biden administration back in September — one that fell apart after a majority of the railroad unions' members voted to reject the deal because it did not address their demands about sick days and paid time off.

In the House, the vote came down 221-207 on Wednesday with all but three Republicans voting against the deal while the Senate vote on Thursday finished 80-15 with Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) voting "present."

Republicans in the Senate expressed their relief that a disastrous nationwide strike had been averted while also pointing out that the need for congressional action was proof of another Biden failure.

"By now everyone should realize nothing good happens when Congress gets involved in issues best left to the private sector," Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) said after the Senate passed its bill. "But our involvement in this debate was inevitable once the Biden Administration, freight rail companies, and labor leaders negotiated a deal rail workers themselves did not support," he added. “One of the most confusing aspects of this debate is how the union members—some of the hardest-working men and women in the country—were left behind by their union bosses," Rubio reminded.

Iowa Republican Senator Joni Ernst said "President Biden could and should have done more to ensure a fair deal – for workers and all Americans," but instead "this is another example of President Biden failing," she said. "He passed the buck to Congress, and sold out our rail workers," Ernst added. "This deal isn't perfect - far from it," the Iowa Republican continued. "I want the record to stand, I strongly believe it should never have come to this."
Recommended

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) — who supported a cooling-off period as an alternative — reminded Americans how Congress got to the point of having to decide whether to impose a contract or let America's rail system grind to a halt, laying the blame on another "brazen" Biden lie. Saying the U.S. economy was brought to "the edge of what would be a fiscal catastrophe all because of the Biden administration's ineptitude. After doing next to nothing to avoid a rail strike, President Biden assured the American people that this matter was settled," Cruz added. "That was a brazen lie."

The biggest losers in all this are now the union members who were sold out both by Democrats — including "most pro-labor President" Joe Biden — and union leaders who agreed to a tentative deal that their members rejected. President Biden, for his part, despite taking a braggadocios victory lap on the tentative agreement as a "win for America" will never admit he lied about averting the strike in September — he only delayed it until after the midterms. And then he still couldn't save it, instead relying on Congress to impose the deal against the wishes of the unions.

Still Biden said on Thursday afternoon that "working together, we have spared this country a Christmas catastrophe in our grocery stores, in our workplaces, and in our communities," even though he was not a part of the "together" — If the situation had been solely left up to him, the strike would have hit next week with devastating consequences.
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
I predict some workers will start doing things exactly "by the book".

A "company man" will need to ORDER them to violate a safety policy to keep things rolling. That makes for long, miserable days for everyone.

Eta: those clueless schmucks on Capitol hill might eventually spin this to their benefit. Nobody will win.
 

rob0126

Veteran Member
So did congress put in their demands that RR workers get paid sick leave, or did they force them back to work, or else?
 
Top